Endangered Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Endangered Plants ENDANGERED PLANTS Thomas J. Stohlgren Colorado State University I. Introduction THE GROWING PUBLIC CONCERN about endangered II. Kinds of Rarity plants is well founded. It is estimated that there are III. Endangerment Patterns between 235,000 (Raven et al., 1986) and 270,000 IV. Causes of Endangerment (IUCN, 1998) species of vascular plants (including V. Consequences of Rarity ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, and flowering VI. Legal Mandates to Protect Endangered Plants plants) in the world today; two-thirds of these species VII. Selected Examples of Endangered Plants are found in the tropics (Raven et al., 1986). The World VIII. Implications Conservation Union (IUCN, 1998) currently lists 33,798 species (12.5% of the world’s flora) as threat- ened, and 6,522 species of plants (2.4% of the world’s flora) as endangered. Threatened plants are found GLOSSARY among 369 plant families in 200 countries. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reports 540 endangered critical habitat Habitat of a threatened or endangered species and 130 threatened species of flowering species that is itself threatened by destruction, dis- plants in the United States (U.S.) as of November 30, turbance, modification, or human activity, poten- 1998. tially resulting in a reduction in the numbers, distri- bution, or reasonable expansion or recovery of that species. I. INTRODUCTION endangered species Those species in danger of extinc- tion throughout all or a significant portion of their Extinction has always played an important role in na- range. ture: 95 to 99% of all species that ever existed are now endemism Condition in which a species’ distribution extinct. It is the current rapid rate of extinction that is restricted to a given geographic region. has many plant ecologists worried. Worldwide, as many rare species Species with small world populations that as 654 species of plants have gone extinct since A.D. are not presently listed as endangered or vulnerable, 1600 (Heywood, 1995). In this time period, about 110 but are at risk because of their small population size. plant species may have gone extinct in Hawaii according threatened species Those species that are likely to be- to records of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and come endangered in the foreseeable future through- The Nature Conservancy. Estimates of plant extinctions out all or a significant portion of their range. in the continental United States range from below 25 (IUCN, 1998) to above 90 (Davis et al., 1986; Flather Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Volume 2 Copyright 2001 by Academic Press. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. 465 466 ENDANGERED PLANTS et al., 1994). The discrepancy in estimates is due to populations in well-suited habitats and smaller popula- incomplete systematic surveys, limited monitoring ac- tions in marginal or sub-optimal habitats. Many threat- tivities, and poor information on viable seed banks. ened vascular plants in Finland were found to be rare Estimates of extinctions in other countries include 71 largely because the species were in marginal rather than plant species in Australia, 53 in South Africa, 47 in suitable habitat (Cropper, 1993). Along with the in- Mauritius, and 23 in Cuba. Three endemic species of creasing threats of rapid environmental change, habitat ebony (Diospyros spp.) went extinct in the Mascarene loss, contaminants, and invasive exotic species, we may Islands before they were described. Nuttall’s mudwort face an uphill battle in protecting our treasured botani- (Micranthemum micranthemoides) had been recorded in cal resources in these sub-optimal habitats. Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylva- Maintaining biodiversity requires a considerable un- nia, Virginia, and the District of Columbia, but, despite derstanding of rarity and the processes and stresses that extensive searches it has not been seen since 1941. The promote the endangerment of certain plant species. This single individual of Dicliptera dodsonii, which clings to article reviews the kinds of rarity, patterns of endanger- life in western Ecuador (Gentry, 1986), may be the next ment, causes of endangerment, consequences of rarity, victim of accelerated extinction. and legal mandates to protect endangered plant species. Estimates of future plant species extinctions vary It then provides selected examples of endangered plants widely. Raven et al. (1986) estimated that about 40,000 and concludes with the management and social implica- tropical plant species may go extinct in the wild within tions of protecting endangered plants. the next several decades. The New York Botanical Gar- den suggests that about 700 of the more than 2000 species of threatened and endangered plant species in II. KINDS OF RARITY the United States may be extinct in the next 10 years. The Center for Plant Conservation reported that 680 There are many published definitions of rarity. In an U.S. plant species were critically endangered, with ap- extreme example, DuMond (1973) stated nine criteria proximately 253 species estimated to become extinct for rarity, including species that are: (1) found out of in 5 years and 427 species to become extinct in 10 years its expected context; (2) particularly subject to extinc- (based on unpublished data in 1988). Today, more than tion or severe reduction in total population size by 10 years later, there is little evidence of these mass human activities that have already caused a significant extinctions, but the concern may still be well founded population reduction; (3) found only in a very specific in several areas. habitat of limited occurrence; (4) thought to be a relict Hawaii provides a good example of endangered of a no-longer extant vegetation association; (5) an plants. Up to 47% of the Hawaiian flora may meet the indicator of a unique extant vegetation association; (6) criteria for official listing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife recognized as an example of a wide, disjunction pattern; Service, with as many as 16% immediately threatened (7) at its natural distribution limits within the area in with extinction (see the Missouri Botanical Garden web- question; (8) known to be introduced and has become site listed in the Bibliography). The genus Hibiscadel- naturalized only on a very small scale; or (9) does not phus in Hawaii includes only six species (with two ex- consistently occur as a member of any particular natural tinct species) with a total of 14 live individuals, and plant community. Gaston (1997) described rarity in one species with only one individual (Cody, 1986). The another way, noting that rare species can be delimited Hawaii Endangered Plant Task Force, which includes on the basis of one, two, or at most a few of the following many federal, state, and non-government partners, now variables: abundance, range size, habitat specificity tracks 597 threatened, endangered, and rare plant (habitat occupancy), temporal persistence (e.g., taxon species. age), threat (probability of, or time to, extinction), gene There is a growing backlog of candidates for listing flow, genetic diversity, endemism, and taxonomic dis- as endangered species. Between July, 1976, and August, tinctness. Rare species in the IUCN Red Book (1998) 1992, about 21 species per year were added to the U.S. are described in terms of population size rather than endangered species list. In the second half of that 16- an assessment of extinction risk, which is reserved for year period, 33 species per year were added to the list threatened and endangered status. The Nature Conser- (Flather et al., 1994). More than 200 plant species are vancy and associated network of Natural Heritage Pro- being petitioned for future listing in the United States. grams rate species endangerment based on five levels It has been said that ‘‘all species are rare somewhere’’ of global rarity (i.e., G1, G2, G3, etc.), national rarity (Orians, 1997), because most plant species have larger (N1, N2, etc.), and state rarity (S1, S2, etc.). ENDANGERED PLANTS 467 The kinds of rarity that concern conservation biolo- vaded broadly since the last Ice Age, and they are gists relate specifically to the potential vulnerability buffered from extinction with widely scattered pop- to extinction. Commonly recognized kinds of rarity ulations in several countries (Davis et al., 1986). (Rabinowitz, 1981; Cropper, 1993) include species • Small populations of new species. For example, a with: newly discovered species of Calyptranthes from El Yunque, Puerto Rico, has a population of four • Small populations, large geographic range, and oc- trees, and Auerodendron pauciflorum from Quebradil- currences in several habitats. For example, Ameri- las and Calyptranthes luquillensis from the Luquillo can chaffseed (Schwalbea americana) had a histori- Mountains have only five individuals each (Cody, cal distribution from Mississippi to Massachusetts. 1986). It resides now in 20 relatively small populations in five states, with the greatest populations in South Generally, species may be ranked for protection Carolina. It can survive in several vegetation types based on overall rarity, magnitude of potential threats as long as there is enough light in the understory. to populations, and the immediacy of the threats. Thus, Fire suppression, which allows for succession and a monotypic genus with high-magnitude and imminent canopy closure, threatens several Schwalbea popula- threats might receive a higher priority ranking than a tions. Another example is Hypochoeris maculata, subspecies with moderate or non-imminent potential which has small populations over a wide range in threats. Great Britain. • Large populations, large geographic range, but oc- currences in specific habitats. For example, several III. ENDANGERMENT PATTERNS grassland species of Calochortus (lilies) in Califor- nia have large populations following wildfires. They Slightly over 90% of threatened plants are single-coun- were thought to be far more widespread prior to a try endemics. Species with restricted ranges face the century of fire suppression and encroachment of greatest threat of extinction. It follows that endemic shrubs into grassland habitats.
Recommended publications
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia
    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc PRINT POST APPROVED VOLUME 25 NO. 11 PP 54366200018 DECEMBER 2001 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA POST OFFICE BOX 565 UNLEY SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5061 The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation from the Management Committee no person is authorised to represent the society on any matter. All native orchids are protected plants in the wild. Their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT: SECRETARY: Bill Dear Cathy Houston Telephone: 82962111 Telephone: 8356 7356 VICE-PRESIDENT David Pettifor Tel. 014095457 COMMITTEE David Hirst Thelma Bridle Bob Bates Malcolm Guy EDITOR: TREASURER Gerry Carne Iris Freeman 118 Hewitt Avenue Toorak Gardens SA 5061 Telephone/Fax 8332 7730 E-mail [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves Mr G. Carne Mr L. Nesbitt Mr R. Bates Mr R. Robjohns Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells Registrar of Judges: Reg Shooter Trading Table: Judy Penney Field Trips & Conservation: Thelma Bridle Tel. 83844174 Tuber Bank Coordinator: Malcolm Guy Tel. 82767350 New Members Coordinator David Pettifor Tel. 0416 095 095 PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian The Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. while taking all due care, take no responsibility for the loss, destruction or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits. Views or opinions expressed by authors of articles within this Journal do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Management. We condones the reprint of any articles if acknowledgement is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society of South Australia
    NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY of SOUTH AUSTRALIA NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA JOURNAL Volume 6, No. 10, November, 1982 Registered by Australia Post Publication No. SBH 1344. Price 40c PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian PRESIDENT: Mr J.T. Simmons SECRETARY: Mr E.R. Hargreaves 4 Gothic Avenue 1 Halmon Avenue STONYFELL S.A. 5066 EVERARD PARK SA 5035 Telephone 32 5070 Telephone 293 2471 297 3724 VICE-PRESIDENT: Mr G.J. Nieuwenhoven COMMITTFE: Mr R. Shooter Mr P. Barnes TREASURER: Mr R.T. Robjohns Mrs A. Howe Mr R. Markwick EDITOR: Mr G.J. Nieuwenhoven NEXT MEETING WHEN: Tuesday, 23rd November, 1982 at 8.00 p.m. WHERE St. Matthews Hail, Bridge Street, Kensington. SUBJECT: This is our final meeting for 1982 and will take the form of a Social Evening. We will be showing a few slides to start the evening. Each member is requested to bring a plate. Tea, coffee, etc. will be provided. Plant Display and Commentary as usual, and Christmas raffle. NEW MEMBERS Mr. L. Field Mr. R.N. Pederson Mr. D. Unsworth Mrs. P.A. Biddiss Would all members please return any outstanding library books at the next meeting. FIELD TRIP -- CHANGE OF DATE AND VENUE The Field Trip to Peters Creek scheduled for 27th November, 1982, and announced in the last Journal has been cancelled. The extended dry season has not been conducive to flowering of the rarer moisture- loving Microtis spp., which were to be the objective of the trip. 92 FIELD TRIP - CHANGE OF DATE AND VENUE (Continued) Instead, an alternative trip has been arranged for Saturday afternoon, 4th December, 1982, meeting in Mount Compass at 2.00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Ssp
    MANAGEMENT OF BONESEED (CHRYSANTHEMOIDES MONILIFERA SSP. MONILIFERA) (L.) T. NORL. USING FIRE, HERBICIDES AND OTHER TECHNIQUES IN AUSTRALIAN WOODLANDS Rachel L. Melland Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Agriculture, Food and Wine University of Adelaide August 2007 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ VI DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 AIMS OF THIS THESIS .......................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................... 5 2.1 PROCESSES OF NATIVE ECOSYSTEM DEGRADATION ............................................................ 5 2.2 GLOBAL PLANT INVASIONS – ECOSYSTEM DEGRADING PROCESSES .................................... 6 2.3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL WEED PROBLEM IN AUSTRALIA ..................................................... 10 2.4 CAUSES AND PROCESSES OF INVASIVENESS .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boneseed Management Manual
    Boneseed management manual Current management and control options for boneseed (Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. monilifera) in Australia Edited by KJ Brougham, H Cherry & PO Downey Weeds of National Significance August 2006 This manual is sponsored by the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage and Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, and the Department of Environment and Conservation NSW This publication is intended to provide information only on the subject under review. It is not intended to provide, nor does it constitute, expert advice. Readers are warned against relying solely on the information contained herein. Further professional advice should be sought before acting on the information supplied in this manual. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this publication, neither the Department of Environment and Conservation NSW, nor its staff accept any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result from any inaccuracy or omission, or from the use of the information contained herein. For further information contact: Pest Management Unit Parks and Wildlife Division Department of Environment and Conservation NSW PO Box 1967, Hurstville NSW 1481 Phone: 1300 361 967 This manual was produced as part of the Weeds of National Significance Program, and is available for free download from the Weeds Australia Website <www.weeds.org.au/WoNS/bitoubush>. Published by: Department of Environment and Conservation NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Ph: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Ph: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Ph: 1300 361 967 (national parks information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DEC 2006/390 ISBN 1 74137 975 X August 2006 This publication should be cited as: Brougham, KJ, Cherry, H and Downey, PO (eds) (2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Boneseed, Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Subsp
    This document was originally published on the website of the CRC for Australian Weed Management, which was wound up in 2008. To preserve the technical information it contains, the department is republishing this document. Due to limitations in the CRC’s production process, however, its content may not be accessible for all users. Please contact the department’s Weed Management Unit if you require more assistance. ������������� ����������������� � ������������������������������������������������������ ISSN 1442-7192 Boneseed, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera Taxonomy and status Botanical name: Chrysanthemoides monilifera subspecies monilifera (L.) T. Norl. (synonym: Osteospermum moniliferum subsp. moniliferum) - Family Boneseed flowers. Asteraceae (daisy family). Photo: K. Blood. Standard common name: boneseed. Relationship to other species in Australia: The introduced weed bitou bush, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. Figure 1. Boneseed flowers, immature fruit rotundata is the only close relative. There and leaf shoot. are no closely-related indigenous species. Photo: K. Blood. Legislation: Boneseed is declared noxious in all States and Lord Howe Island. It is listed as Boneseed differs from bitou bush by its upright a Weed of National Significance in Australia. growth habit (versus the sprawling habit of Boneseed infestation. Keep up to date with the latest legislation bitou bush), less rounded and more obviously Photo: K. Blood. through local and State/Territory government toothed leaves (Figure 2), flowers with less weed agencies or on the web at 'petals' (5-8 for boneseed versus 11-13 for www.weeds.org.au bitou bush) and round, smooth seeds (versus usually smaller and darker egg-shaped ribbed seeds for bitou bush) (Figure 3). Description Habitllifeform: woody erect shrub. Description: Boneseed is an upright shrub to small tree generally 1-2 m wide x 0.5-3 m high, but occasionally to 6 m tall.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sistemática Y Evolución De Encyclia Hook
    ·>- POSGRADO EN CIENCIAS ~ BIOLÓGICAS CICY ) Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C. Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas SISTEMÁTICA Y EVOLUCIÓN DE ENCYCLIA HOOK. (ORCHIDACEAE: LAELIINAE), CON ÉNFASIS EN MEGAMÉXICO 111 Tesis que presenta CARLOS LUIS LEOPARDI VERDE En opción al título de DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS (Ciencias Biológicas: Opción Recursos Naturales) Mérida, Yucatán, México Abril 2014 ( 1 CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA DE YUCATÁN, A.C. POSGRADO EN CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS OSCJRA )0 f CENCIAS RECONOCIMIENTO S( JIOI ÚGIC A'- CICY Por medio de la presente, hago constar que el trabajo de tesis titulado "Sistemática y evo­ lución de Encyclia Hook. (Orchidaceae, Laeliinae), con énfasis en Megaméxico 111" fue realizado en los laboratorios de la Unidad de Recursos Naturales del Centro de Investiga­ ción Científica de Yucatán , A.C. bajo la dirección de los Drs. Germán Carnevali y Gustavo A. Romero, dentro de la opción Recursos Naturales, perteneciente al Programa de Pos­ grado en Ciencias Biológicas de este Centro. Atentamente, Coordinador de Docencia Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C. Mérida, Yucatán, México; a 26 de marzo de 2014 DECLARACIÓN DE PROPIEDAD Declaro que la información contenida en la sección de Materiales y Métodos Experimentales, los Resultados y Discusión de este documento, proviene de las actividades de experimen­ tación realizadas durante el período que se me asignó para desarrollar mi trabajo de tesis, en las Unidades y Laboratorios del Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., y que a razón de lo anterior y en contraprestación de los servicios educativos o de apoyo que me fueron brindados, dicha información, en términos de la Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor y la Ley de la Propiedad Industrial, le pertenece patrimonialmente a dicho Centro de Investigación.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Port Phillip and Westernport, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Orchidaceae: Genera and Species (12/1/2004)
    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (21/1/2008) by Mark A. Clements Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P- H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name. Synonyms are also cross-referenced under genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Ukiah Western Hills Open Land Acquisition & Limited Development
    Ukiah Western Hills Open Land Acquisition & Limited Development Agreement Draft Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachments April 16, 2021 ATTACHMENT A Existing Site Photographs Existing access road Existing water tank site Existing "house site" on one of the proposed Development Parcels ATTACHMENT B Prepared For: Michelle Irace, Planning Manager Department of Community Development 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482 APNs: 001-040-83, 157- 070-01, 157-070-02, and 003-190-01 Prepared by Jacobszoon & Associates, Inc. Alicia Ives Ringstad Senior Wildlife Biologist [email protected] Date: March 11, 2021 Updated: April 8, 2021 Biological Assessment Report Table of Contents Section 1.0: Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Section 2.0: Regulations and Descriptions ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Natural Communities and Sensitive Natural Communities .................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Special-Status Species...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]