DOCSLIB.ORG

AGS Marine Net Pen Relocation Project: Port Angeles-East- Biological Evaluation | 15-260 | American Gold Seafoods | USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AGS Marine Net Pen Relocation Project: Port Angeles-East- Biological Evaluation | 15-260 | American Gold Seafoods | USA Final Report AGS Marine Net Pen Relocation Applied Science Associates Project: Port Angeles-East A member of the RPS Group plc Biological Evaluation 55 Village Square Drive AUTHOR(S): South Kingstown, RI 02879 USA RPS ASA: Tel: +1 (401) 789-6224 Alicia Morandi Fax: +1 (401) 789-1932 Jill Rowe M. Conor McManus Zachary Singer Leavitt www: www.rpsgroup.com Richard Balouskus www: www.asascience.com Melanie Gearon Shoal’s Edge Consulting: Danielle Reich PROJECT NUMBER: VERSION: Final RPS ASA 15-260 DATE: 21 January 2016 Prepared for: American Gold Seafoods Applied Science Associates a member of the RPS Group plc Location End Client Internal Reviewer(s) Clallam County, Washington American Gold Seafoods Vicki Morris (Vicki Morris Consulting Services; SEPA/NEPA Document Preparation and Permit Specialist), Danielle Reich (Shoals Edge) Date Release File Name Notes Submitted Final RPSASA_PortAngeles_BioEval_2016Jan21.doc 1/21/2016 Biological Evaluation i rpsgroup.com rpsgroup.com | asascience.com | 122 AGS Marine Net Pen Relocation Project: Port Angeles-East- Biological Evaluation | 15-260 | American Gold Seafoods | USA 1/21/2016 Executive Summary American Gold Seafoods (subsidiary of Icicle Seafoods) has contracted with RPS ASA for preparation of a Biological Evaluation to address relocation of an existing marine aquaculture operation from within Port Angeles Harbor to a new site east of the harbor. The marine net pen relocation project is driven by a US Navy proposal to build a pier on the harbor side of Ediz Hook that will expropriate a portion of the Aquatic Lands Lease area used by the existing AGS Port Angeles Harbor farm, and result in significant construction impacts and operational risks to the existing operation. This document includes a summary of the benthic, pelagic, and shoreline habitats in the vicinity of the proposed project area; a description of the threatened and endangered species and critical habitats that may be present in the project action area, and an effects analysis of the potential impacts of net pen construction and operation on the species and habitats most likely to occur within the project action area. Following the analysis of species and habitats of concern, Table E-1 provides the summary of effects findings for each species or group. Table E-1. Summary of effects analysis findings for protected and priority species that may occur within or near the project action area. Species Effects Analysis Determination Marine Mammals Gray whale may affect, not likely to adversely affect Humpback whale may affect, not likely to adversely affect Killer whale a may affect, not likely to adversely affect Dall’s porpoise may affect, not likely to adversely affect Pacific harbor porpoise may affect, not likely to adversely affect Harbor seal may affect, not likely to adversely affect Northern elephant seal may affect, not likely to adversely affect California sea lion may affect, not likely to adversely affect Stellar sea lion may affect, not likely to adversely affect Marine Fish Bull trout a may affect, not likely to adversely affect Dolly varden may affect, not likely to adversely affect ii rpsgroup.com rpsgroup.com | asascience.com | 122 AGS Marine Net Pen Relocation Project: Port Angeles-East- Biological Evaluation | 15-260 | American Gold Seafoods | USA 1/21/2016 Species Effects Analysis Determination Chinook salmon (Puget Sound ESU) a may affect, not likely to adversely affect Chum salmon (Puget Sound/Strait of may affect, not likely to adversely affect Georgia ESU) Coho salmon may affect, not likely to adversely affect Cutthroat may affect, not likely to adversely affect Pink salmon (Odd Year DPS) may affect, not likely to adversely affect Steelhead trout (Puget Sound DPS) may affect, not likely to adversely affect Bocaccio (Puget Sound/Georgia Basin may affect, not likely to adversely affect DPS) Canary rockfish (Puget Sound/Georgia may affect, not likely to adversely affect Basin DPS) Yelloweye rockfish (Puget may affect, not likely to adversely affect Sound/Georgia Basin DPS) Other rockfish species b may affect, not likely to adversely affect Eulachon (Southern DPS) may affect, not likely to adversely affect Green sturgeon (Southern DPS) a may affect, not likely to adversely affect Green sturgeon (Northern DPS) may affect, not likely to adversely affect Pacific cod may affect, not likely to adversely affect Pacific hake may affect, not likely to adversely affect Pacific herring may affect, not likely to adversely affect Walleye pollock may affect, not likely to adversely affect Marine Invertebrates Geoduck may affect, not likely to adversely affect Birds Bald eagle may affect, not likely to adversely affect Common loon may affect, not likely to adversely affect iii rpsgroup.com rpsgroup.com | asascience.com | 122 AGS Marine Net Pen Relocation Project: Port Angeles-East- Biological Evaluation | 15-260 | American Gold Seafoods | USA 1/21/2016 Species Effects Analysis Determination Brandt’s cormorant may affect, not likely to adversely affect Brown pelican may affect, not likely to adversely affect Tufted puffin may affect, not likely to adversely affect Marbled murrelet may affect, not likely to adversely affect Clarke’s grebe may affect, not likely to adversely affect Western grebe may affect, not likely to adversely affect Common murre may affect, not likely to adversely affect a Critical habitat for this species is designated within the project area. b Black rockfish, brown rockfish, copper rockfish, quillback rockfish, tiger rockfish, yellowtail rockfish, green-striped rockfish, widow rockfish, red-stripe rockfish, china rockfish. iv rpsgroup.com rpsgroup.com | asascience.com | 122 AGS Marine Net Pen Relocation Project: Port Angeles-East- Biological Evaluation | 15-260 | American Gold Seafoods | USA 1/21/2016 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Proposed Action ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Action Area ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Document Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Clallam County Critical Areas Code Habitat Management Plan and Mitigation Plan .................................. 4 1.5 Clallam County Floodplain Management Code ............................................................................................ 6 1.6 Regulations Applicable to this BE ................................................................................................................. 7 2 Habitats near the Project Action Area .................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Benthic Habitats ........................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Pelagic Habitats ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2.3 Shoreline Habitats ........................................................................................................................................ 8 2.4 Critical Habitats ............................................................................................................................................ 9 2.5 Essential Fish Habitat ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.6 Environmental Baseline Conditions ........................................................................................................... 10 3 Priority Habitats and Species near the Project Area ........................................................................................... 11 3.1 Marine Mammals ....................................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.1 Gray Whale ........................................................................................................................................ 16 3.1.1.1 Status and Description .............................................................................................................. 16 3.1.1.2 Distribution and Habitat Use .................................................................................................... 16 3.1.1.3 Threats and Occurrence within the Project Action Area .......................................................... 17 3.1.2 Humpback Whale .............................................................................................................................. 17 3.1.2.1 Status and Description .............................................................................................................. 17 3.1.2.2 Distribution and Habitat Use .................................................................................................... 18 3.1.2.3 Threats and Occurrence within the Project Action Area .......................................................... 18 3.1.3 Killer Whale ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 State of Our Watersheds Report West WRIA 18 – Morse Creek to Elwha River
    2016 State of Our Watersheds Report West WRIA 18 – Morse Creek to Elwha River am removal seemed like an elusive Dtarget over the years and many citizens were skeptical of the benefits. However in just four years the river has transported over 60% of the stored sediment, resulting in a rebirth of the estuary and the floodplain. Salmon are ascending to historic habitats and the recovery of the ecosystem is about to blossom. -MIkE MCHENrY FIsHErIEs HABItAt MANAGEr Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe is part of the Klal- lam Band of Indians that have resided throughout the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Hood Canal and Port Gamble Bay for generations. They are party to the Point No Point Treaty of 1855, when tribes ceded most their traditional lands to the U.S. government. The Dunge- ness-Elwha Basin (WRIA 18) has remained largely Seattle rural and forested with a natural resources-based economy focused on shellfish harvesting, commercial forestry, commercial fisheries, tourism, and agricul- ture. Major land-use impacts on salmon habitat have occurred from floodplain and shoreline development, road construction and past logging practices. This report will focus on the northwest portion of WRIA 18 basin and surrounding marine waters, which is only a portion of the area that the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe co-manages. 58 Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Elwha Basin The Area of Concern for the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe (Elwha shoreline habitat conditions. Both internal and outside reviews Tribe) is the western portion of WRIA 18, from the Elwha River have concluded that recovery efforts are behind the expected pace watershed to Morse Creek, east of Port Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping and Monitoring Bluff Erosion with Boat-Based LIDAR and the Development of A
    Mapping and Monitoring Bluff Erosion with Boat-based LIDAR and the Development of a Sediment Budget and Erosion Model for the Elwha and Dungeness Littoral Cells, Clallam County, Washington GEORGE M. KAMINSKY HEATHER M. BARON AMANDA HACKING DIANA McCANDLESS Washington State Department of Ecology Coastal Monitoring & Analysis Program DAVID S. PARKS Washington State Department of Natural Resources 1 This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement PC00J29801 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife contract number 12-1119 and sponsored by Coastal Watershed Institute. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. 2 ABSTRACT The spatial distribution and temporal variability of retreat rates of coastal bluffs composed of unconsolidated glacial deposits are of intense interest to landowners who occupy bluff-top properties as well as coastal resource managers who are responsible for protecting marine habitats such as forage fish spawning beaches dependent on bluff-derived sediments. Assessment of the bluff retreat and associated sediment volumes contributed to the nearshore over time is the first step toward development of a coastal sediment budget for bluff-backed beaches. This project develops and applies a boat-based LiDAR system for mapping and monitoring bluff erosion patterns from June 2012 to August 2013 to augment traditional data sources including aerial photography (1939 and 2001), GPS-based beach profile data (2010-2013), and airborne LiDAR (2001 and 2012). These data are analyzed in context to determine alongshore rates of bluff retreat and associated volume change for the Elwha and Dungeness littoral cells in Clallam County, Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary and Anticipated Responses to Elwha River Dam Removal 9 by Guy Gelfenbaum, Jeffrey J
    Chapter Summary and Anticipated Responses to Elwha River Dam Removal 9 By Guy Gelfenbaum, Jeffrey J. Duda, and Jonathan A. Warrick Abstract Starting in September 2011, the removal low nutrient concentrations in the river of two large dams on the Elwha River will waters, and coastal erosion that has begin an unprecedented river restoration accelerated markedly with time. During project because of the size of the dams, and after the removal of these dams, the volume of sediment released, the the Elwha River and its ecosystems will pristine watershed upstream of the dam be altered by a renewal of sediment sites, and the potential for renewing discharge downstream of the dams and salmon populations. Ecosystem studies a reintroduction of salmon spawning of the Elwha watershed indicate that the upstream of the dams. This chapter effects of almost 100 years of damming summarizes the pre-dam and current state are measurable and of consequence. of the river and its coastal ecosystems, These effects include smaller spawning and describes the likely outcomes of salmon populations, massive sediment river restoration on the Elwha River retention behind the dams, coarsening ecosystems. of the riverbed downstream of the dams, Chapter 19 250 Coastal Habitats of the Elwha River, Washington—Biological and Physical Patterns and Processes Prior to Dam Removal Introduction A. 125° 123° 49° The removal of two large dams on the Elwha River presents an opportunity to restore Str ait o Salish Sea natural fluvial processes to a mostly pristine f Ju an deFuca watershed and rebuild iconic salmon runs. fig. B 48° Glines After removal of the dams, salmon populations Elwha Canyon Dam are expected to increase dramatically over PACIFIC Dam their present numbers (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thečḯxwicən Project of Northwest Washington State, U.S.A.: Opportunity Lost, Opportunity Found Virginia L
    Western Washington University Masthead Logo Western CEDAR Anthropology Faculty and Staff ubP lications Anthropology 2019 TheČḯxwicən Project of Northwest Washington State, U.S.A.: Opportunity Lost, opportunity Found Virginia L. Butler Kristine M. Bovy Sarah K. Campbell Western Washington University, [email protected] Michael A. Etnier Western Washington University, [email protected] Sarah L. Sterling Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/anthropology_facpubs Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Butler, Virginia L.; Bovy, Kristine M.; Campbell, Sarah K.; Etnier, Michael A.; and Sterling, Sarah L., "TheČḯxwicən Project of Northwest Washington State, U.S.A.: Opportunity Lost, opportunity Found" (2019). Anthropology Faculty and Staff Publications. 25. https://cedar.wwu.edu/anthropology_facpubs/25 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty and Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 23 (2019) 1095–1103 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep The Čḯxwicən project of Northwest Washington State, U.S.A.: Opportunity lost, opportunity found T ⁎ Virginia L. Butlera, , Kristine M. Bovyb, Sarah K. Campbellc, Michael A. Etnierc, Sarah L. Sterlinga a Portland State
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B – 3: Eastern Strait Sub-Region
    Appendix B – 3: Eastern Strait Sub-Region Table of Contents Sub-Region Summary ……………………………………………………………. 2 Geographic Location …………………………………………………….. 2 Geology and Shoreline Sediment Drift …………………………………. 2 Information Sources …………………………………………………….. 3 Description of Sub-regional Habitat Complexes ………………………. 4 Habitat Changes and Impairment of Ecological Processes …………… 11 Relative Condition of Habitat Complexes ……………………………… 13 Management Recommendations …………………………………………14 Habitat Complex Narratives ……………………………………………………. 16 Coville Creek …………………………………………………………… 16 Elwha River ……………………………………………………………… 17 Dry Creek ……………………………………………………………… 26 Ediz Hook ……………………………………………………………… 27 Port Angeles Harbor …………………………………………………… 30 Lees Creek ………………………………………………………………. 37 Morse Creek …………………………………………………………… 39 Bagley Creek ………………………………………………………….. 41 Siebert Creek …………………………………………………………… 42 McDonald Creek ………………………………………………………… 45 Dungeness Spit …………………………………………………………… 46 Cline Spit ………………………………………………………………… 55 Dungeness River ………………………………………………………… 57 Meadowbrook Creek …………………………………………………… 60 Cassalery Creek (including Cooper Creek) …………………………… 64 Gierin Creek (Graysmarsh) ……………………………………………. 69 References ………………………………………………………………………. 73 1 Eastern Strait Sub-Region Sub-Region Summary Geographic Location The Eastern Strait sub-region extends from Observatory Point on the west edge of Freshwater Bay to Gierin Creek (Graysmarsh) at the east end of a sediment divergence zone (Figure 1). Observatory Pt. Figure 1. Habitat complexes and net shore-drift (WDOE
    [Show full text]
  • 2.4 Elwha River and Tributaries Page 2.4-1
    Chapter 2.4 Elwha River and Tributaries Page 2.4-1 2.4 ELWHA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES 2.4.1 Overview The Elwha River is the largest watershed in the EMMT area and it constitutes the westernmost watershed within the planning area (Figure 2.4-1). The Elwha mainstem is approximately 45 miles long, has 100 miles of tributary streams, has a basin averaging approximately ten miles wide in an east-west direction, and drains 321 square miles of the Olympic Peninsula. Eighty-three percent of the drainage, including the upper 35 miles of the mainstem, lies within Olympic National Park, and is therefore protected from timber harvest, agriculture, and other land-use disturbances. The river flows in a northerly direction into the Strait of Juan de Fuca, entering the strait five miles west of Port Angeles. The Elwha is the fourth largest river, by drainage area, among all Olympic Peninsula streams, with a watershed area smaller only than those of the Quillayute, Queets, and Quinault rivers. Two major hydroelectric developments have altered the historic condition of the Elwha River. The Elwha Dam, built at RM 4.9 beginning in 1910, now impounds the 2.5-mile long Lake Aldwell reservoir, and the Glines Canyon Dam, built at RM 13.4, now impounds the 2.8-mile long Lake Mills reservoir. Originally built and operated to produce electricity for Port Angeles and beyond (supplying power as far away as Bremerton and Port Townsend prior to 1921), the dams have been fully allocated to supplying power to the pulp mill now operated by Nippon Paper Industries USA since the early 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 173-26 WAC) and Project Scope of Work Promulgated by Ecology, and Includes All Areas Within Current City Limits As Well As the City’S Urban Growth Area (UGA)
    CITY OF PORT ANGELES GRANT NO. G1000051 SHORELINE INVENTORY, CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS REPORT for City of Port Angeles’ Shoreline: Strait of Juan de Fuca June 2012 Prepared for: City of Port Angeles Community and Economic Development 321 East 5th Street Port Angeles, WA 98362 Prepared by: 1904 3rd Avenue, Suite 725 130 2nd Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98101 Edmonds, WA 98020 June 2012 The Watershed Company Reference Number: 100320 This report was funded in part through a grant from the Washington Department of Ecology. The Watershed Company Contact Person: Dan Nickel Makers Contact Person: John Owen Cite this document as: Shoreline Inventory, Characterization and Analysis Report for the City of Port Angeles’ Shoreline: Strait of Juan de Fuca. June 2012 Prepared for the City of Port Angeles, WA. The Watershed Company, Makers Architecture + urban design, and Landau Associates. TA B L E O F C ONTENTS Page # 1 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose ............................................................................. 1 1.2 Shoreline Jurisdiction ................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Area ...................................................................................................... 2 2 Current Regulatory Framework Summary ............................... 3 2.1 City of Port Angeles ....................................................................................... 3 2.2 State
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Lower Elwha River, Washington, Prior to Dam Removal—History, Status, 1 and Defining Characteristics
    Chapter Coastal and Lower Elwha River, Washington, Prior to Dam Removal—History, Status, 1 and Defining Characteristics By Jeffrey J. Duda, Jonathan A. Warrick, and Christopher S. Magirl Abstract Characterizing the physical and and are currently in low numbers. Dam biological characteristics of the removal will reopen access to more lower Elwha River, its estuary, and than 140 km of mainstem, flood plain, adjacent nearshore habitats prior to and tributary habitat, most of which dam removal is essential to monitor is protected within Olympic National changes to these areas during and Park. The high capture rate of river- following the historic dam-removal borne sediments by the two reservoirs project set to begin in September has changed the geomorphology of 2011. Based on the size of the two the riverbed downstream of the dams. hydroelectric projects and the amount Mobilization and downstream transport of sediment that will be released, the of these accumulated reservoir Elwha River in Washington State will sediments during and following dam be home to the largest river restoration removal will significantly change through dam removal attempted in downstream river reaches, the the United States. Built in 1912 and estuary complex, and the nearshore 1927, respectively, the Elwha and environment. To introduce the more Glines Canyon Dams have altered key detailed studies that follow in this physical and biological characteristics report, we summarize many of the key of the Elwha River. Once abundant aspects of the Elwha River ecosystem salmon populations, consisting of including a regional and historical all five species of Pacific salmon, context for this unprecedented project.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Restoration Plan
    CITY OF PORT ANGELES GRANT NO. G1000051 S H O R E L I N E R ESTORATION P LAN for City of Port Angeles’ Shoreline: Strait of Juan de Fuca Prepared for: City of Port Angeles Community and Economic Development 321 East 5th Street Port Angeles, WA 98362 Prepared by: 1904 3rd Avenue, Suite 725 Seattle, Washington 98101 Date: This report was funded JuneSeptember, 2012 in part through a grant from the Washington Department of Ecology. Port Angeles Shoreline Restoration Plan Cite this document as: Shoreline Restoration Plan for the City of Port Angeles’ Shoreline: Strait of Juan de Fuca. Prepared for the City of Port Angeles, WA. The Watershed Company and Makers Architecture + Urban Design. DecemberJune 2012. Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Shoreline Inventory Summary ...................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Shoreline Boundary ........................................................................................ 7 2.3 Inventory ........................................................................................................ 8 2.3.1 Land Use and Physical Conditions .......................................................... 10 2.3.2 Biological Resources and Critical Areas .............................................. 1311 3.0 Restoration
    [Show full text]
  • An Interpretive History of the Elwha River Valley and the Legacy of Hydropower on Washington's Olympic Peninsula
    Final Submittal An Interpretive History of the Elwha River Valley and the Legacy of Hydropower on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula by Paul Sadin, Project Historian Dawn Vogel, Research Historian Project Manager Heather Lee Miller, Associate Historian Historical Research Associates 1904 Third Avenue, Suite 240 Seattle, WA 98101 Submitted to National Park Service Olympic National Park 600 East Park Avenue Port Angeles, WA 98362 January 2011 This page left intentionally blank. Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... xi Selected Chronology of Events: Elwha and Glines Canyon Dams, 1855-2009 ......................... xiii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 The Power of the Elwha ............................................................................................................................ 4 Chapter 1 The Power of the Elwha River ....................................................................................... 9 The Klallam People of the North Peninsula ............................................................................................ 10 European Contact ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sepa Environmental Checklist
    Project: Terminal 7 Site Redevelopment and Stormwater Conveyance Improvements Applicant: Port of Port Angeles SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. Background [help] Note: Blue underlined text is revised language in response to mitigation conditions requested by the City of Port Angeles and per comments on the Shoreline Permit Application received from the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe. 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: [help] Terminal 7 Site Redevelopment and Stormwater Conveyance Improvements 2. Name of applicant: [help] Port of Port Angeles 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: [help] 338 W. First Street Port Angeles, WA 98362 360-417-3452 Contact: Jesse Waknitz / Environmental Manager 4. Date checklist prepared: [help] 3/9/2017 6/29/2017 – Checklist Revised 5. Agency requesting checklist: [help] Port of Port Angeles (Port) & City of Port Angeles 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): [help] Summer/Fall 2017 - Phase 1: Construction of stormwater conveyance and grading at the Port Terminal 7 Log Yard. This SEPA checklist is for Phase 1only. Summer/Fall 2018 – Phase 2: Installation of stormwater treatment at the Port Terminal 7 Log Yard. Phase 2 will undergo individualized SEPA review as soon as the “principle features of a proposal and its environmental impacts can be reasonably identified… and the environmental effects can be meaningfully evaluated.” (WAC 197-11-055) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. [help] Summer/Fall 2018 – Phase 2: Installation of stormwater treatment and associated stormwater conveyance at the Port Log Yard.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 4 - “Local History”
    LESSON 4 - “LOCAL HISTORY” ESSENTIAL QUESTION What combination of factors both natural and manmade is necessary for healthy river restoration and how does this enhance the sustainability of natural and human communities? GUIDING QUESTION: What was the life of a homesteader like and what tools from today would make their lives simpler? LESSON OVERVIEW: During this lesson students will read three articles and create a time line by putting the events in chronological order using a graphic organizer. The time line can be used in future lessons to add later occurring events. The time line will allow students to see how events in one area can affect local, state, national and world history and visa versa. TIME NEEDED: One 45-50 minute class period MATERIALS: Journal Articles o Port Angeles - Thumbnail History o Ceremony in Port Angeles marks arrival of electricity o Clallam County-Thumbnail History Graphic Organizers o “Countdown to the Elwha River Restoration” o “Countdown to the Elwha River Restoration” teacher master PROCEDURES: 1. Have the students read the three articles: 1 Port Angeles - Thumbnail History 2 Ceremony in Port Angeles marks arrival of electricity 3 Clallam County-Thumbnail History 2. Have the students highlight all dates then fill in the graphic organizer. 3. Discuss how to combine the information from the three articles and other information into one time line. 4. Assign a journal entry to discuss one national or world historical event that affected the local area. For example, the exploration of the Washington coast brought European diseases to the native tribes thereby reducing their populations.
    [Show full text]