DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 6: Recommendations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINAL REPORT LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS CHAPTER 6: RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared for: USDA FOREST SERVICE SPRING MOUNTAINS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST Contract No. AG-9360-C-06-0003 Prepared by: ENTRIX, INC. Las Vegas, NV Project No. 3138801 August 2008 FINAL REPORT LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS CHAPTER 6: RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared for: USDA FOREST SERVICE SPRING MOUNTAINS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST 4701 North Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 Prepared by: ENTRIX, INC. 8010 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 702-413-1020 Project No. 3138801 August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 2.0 FINAL ISSUE AND KEY QUESTIONS.....................................................................................................1 2.1 Core Topic: Species and Habitat Protection/Maintaining Species Viability.....................................1 2.1.1 Issue....................................................................................................................................1 2.1.2 Key Questions .....................................................................................................................1 2.2 Core Topic: Recreation and Human Use...........................................................................................2 2.2.1 Issue....................................................................................................................................2 2.2.2 Key Questions .....................................................................................................................2 3.0 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS..........................................................................................................2 3.1 Subtopic: Species ..............................................................................................................................2 3.2 Subtopic: Conservation Agreement and General Management Plan (Spring Mountains NRA Amendments).........................................................................................................................14 3.3 Subtopic: Environmental education, interpretation and outreach ...................................................28 3.4 Subtopic: Data management ...........................................................................................................30 3.5 Subtopic: Current and future activities............................................................................................30 4.0 SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................................................31 4.1 Species and Habitat Protection/Key Question 1..............................................................................31 4.1.1 Subtopic: Developed campgrounds/picnic areas/trailheads.............................................31 4.1.2 Subtopic: Concentrated use areas (CUAs) .......................................................................31 4.1.3 Subtopic: System roads (paved and unpaved) and open motorized trails ........................33 4.1.4 Subtopic: High and low mileage trails .............................................................................35 4.1.5 Subtopic: Non-system trails and closed motorized trails..................................................36 4.1.6 Subtopic: Ski area (current and future development).......................................................36 4.1.7 Subtopic: Snow play .........................................................................................................37 4.1.8 Subtopic: Caves/climbing areas .......................................................................................38 4.1.9 Subtopic: Future activities (proposed developed campgrounds, picnic areas, trails, and trailheads) .......................................................................................................39 4.1.10 Subtopic: Firewood gathering areas ................................................................................39 4.2 Species and Habitat Protection/Key Question 2..............................................................................40 4.2.1 Sub-topic: Wildlife urban interface (WUI) .......................................................................40 4.3 Species and Habitat Protection/Key Question 3..............................................................................41 4.3.1 Subtopic: Wild horses and burros.....................................................................................41 4.3.2 Subtopic: Private land/private buildings..........................................................................42 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.4 Species and Habitat Protection/Key Question 4..............................................................................44 4.5 Species and Habitat Protection/Key Question 5..............................................................................45 4.6 Recreation and Human Use/Key Question 1...................................................................................45 4.7 Recreation and Human Use/ Key Question 2..................................................................................46 5.0 DATA GAPS................................................................................................................................................50 6.0 MONITORING AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS...................................................................................52 6.1 Species and Habitat Protection/Maintaining Species Viability.......................................................52 6.2 Recreation and Human Uses ...........................................................................................................55 6.3 Education, Interpretation, and Outreach .........................................................................................57 7.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................................58 8.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ..............................................................................................................................60 TABLES Table 6-1 List of Special Status Species ...........................................................................................................4 Table 6-2 List of Other Species Considered....................................................................................................10 Table 6-3 Each general commitment (GC) and conservation action in the Spring Mountains Conservation Agreement (USES 1998) was evaluated based on the analysis in the Landscape Assessment. The team recommended continuing, revising, or dropping conservation measures. If the analysis did not address a conservation measures, no opinion was given. ..........................................................................................................................15 Table 6-4 Estimated Quantities to Support Projected East Side Recreation Demand .....................................47 Table 6-5 Estimated Quantities to Support Projected West Side Recreation Demand....................................48 Table 6-6 Data gaps for Recreation and Human Uses.....................................................................................50 Table 6-7 Data gaps for Biological Resources ................................................................................................51 ACRONYMS AML Appropriate Management Level BLM Bureau of Land Management BMPs best management practices CA Conservation Agreement CUAs Concentrated use areas GC general commitment GIS Geographic Information System GMP General Management Plan MVUM Motorized Vehicle Use Map NEPA National Environmental Policy Act ii TABLE OF CONTENTS NRA National Recreation Area NRIS Natural Resource Information System OHV Off Highway Vehicle RNA Research Natural Area USFS U.S. Forest Service VC Visitor center WUI Wildlife urban interface iii TABLE OF CONTENTS This Page Intentionally Left Blank iv Chapter 6 Recommendations 1.0 INTRODUCTION This step of the process is the final phase of this Landscape Assessment. The purpose of Chapter 6 is to recommend management strategies, actions, or processes that will provide for a sustainable biological and social ecosystem within the Springs Mountains National Recreation Area (NRA). The recommendations are intended to be used for development of program direction, project priorities, and information/data needs. It is also anticipated that any specific recommendation may be modified as a result of additional information, future analysis, or agency direction. The recommendations are both broad scale in nature and site specific, with scope of the recommendations being compatible with both the accuracy and specificity of the information contained in the Landscape Assessment. The basis for the recommendations is found within Chapters 1-5 of this Landscape Assessment. The Recommendations are developed in response to the key questions that were initially developed by the Project Interdisciplinary Team. However, some of the recommendations are more programmatic in nature and thus address all key questions and are identified separately. In addition, Chapter 6 contains recommendations regarding specific Action Items contained in the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Conservation Agreement (CA) (Table
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Background of the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area

    Cultural Background of the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area

    American Indian Groups Recent studies of the Great Basin region, which includes the Las Vegas and Pahrump Valleys, have begun to show that people may have lived in this area as far back as 12,000 to 13,000 years ago. When people first began to arrive here, the environment was far more wet and lush than the world we know today. Lakes, playas, and marshes all existed in the area and this abundance of water led to a much greater variety of plants and animals that the people who lived here used. As the environment of the Spring Mountains changed over time, a unique physical history developed that helped it evolve into the fascinating place it is today. As the water began to dry up around 10,000 years ago, the Spring Mountains became isolated from the Great Basin mountain ecosystems and slowly the mountains were surrounded by the drier Mojave Desert. As it became warmer and drier, the mountain range also became isolated biologically. The valley floors surrounding the range act as a barrier to most plant and animal migrations, and thus many of the plants and animals found here today are either relic species or are new or evolved species found only to exist in this area. As the physical environment changed, so did the ways that people lived and used the land. American Indian groups have had a continuous presence in Southern Nevada for thousands of years and believe that the Spring Mountains are where their people were created. Because of this, the mountains are considered to be sacred and very special to them.
  • Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 Is a Mountainous, Deeply Dissected, and Westerly Tilting Fault Block

    Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 Is a Mountainous, Deeply Dissected, and Westerly Tilting Fault Block

    5 . S i e r r a N e v a d a Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 is a mountainous, deeply dissected, and westerly tilting fault block. It is largely composed of granitic rocks that are lithologically distinct from the sedimentary rocks of the Klamath Mountains (78) and the volcanic rocks of the Cascades (4). A Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, Vegas, Reno, and Carson City areas. Most of the state is internally drained and lies Literature Cited: high fault scarp divides the Sierra Nevada (5) from the Northern Basin and Range (80) and Central Basin and Range (13) to the 2 2 . A r i z o n a / N e w M e x i c o P l a t e a u east. Near this eastern fault scarp, the Sierra Nevada (5) reaches its highest elevations. Here, moraines, cirques, and small lakes and quantity of environmental resources. They are designed to serve as a spatial within the Great Basin; rivers in the southeast are part of the Colorado River system Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of the Ecoregion 22 is a high dissected plateau underlain by horizontal beds of limestone, sandstone, and shale, cut by canyons, and United States (map): Washington, D.C., USFS, scale 1:7,500,000. are especially common and are products of Pleistocene alpine glaciation. Large areas are above timberline, including Mt. Whitney framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and those in the northeast drain to the Snake River.
  • Framework for Springs Stewardship Program and Proposed Action Development: Spring Mountains National Recreation Area, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest

    Framework for Springs Stewardship Program and Proposed Action Development: Spring Mountains National Recreation Area, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest

    United States Department of Agriculture Framework for Springs Stewardship Program and Proposed Action Development: Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-330 December 2014 Coles-Ritchie, Marc; Solem, Stephen J.; Springer, Abraham E.; Pendleton, Burton. 2014. Framework for Springs Stewardship Program and proposed action development: Spring Mountains National Recreation Area, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-330. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 63 p. Keywords: Spring stewardship, spring restoration, groundwater dependent ecosystems, watershed management, spring rehabilitation, spring maintenance AUTHORS Marc Coles-Ritchie, Ph.D., is a Vegetation Ecologist with Management and Engineering Technology International, Inc. (METI, Inc.), Salt Lake City, Utah. Stephen J. Solem is a senior advisor for natural resource planning and inventory with Management and Engineering Technology International, Inc. (METI, Inc.), Missoula, Montana. Abraham E. Springer, Ph.D., is a Hydrogeologist and Professor at Northern Arizona University and consultant to Management and Engineering Technology International, Inc. (METI, Inc.), Flagstaff, Arizona. Burton Pendleton, Ph.D., is a Research Ecologist Emeritus with the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Albuquerque, New Mexico. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This effort was accomplished by using funding provided by the Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act conservation initiative (Round 10). Work was performed using In-Service Agreements between the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest and the Rocky Mountain Research Station and under the terms and conditions of Management and Engineering Technologies International, Inc. Contract Number: AG- 3187-C-0028, Order Number: AG-3187-D-10-0126.
  • Science to Support Land Management in Southern Nevada

    Science to Support Land Management in Southern Nevada

    Chapter 6 Species of Conservation Concern and Environmental Stressors: Local, Regional, and Global Effects Steven M. Ostoja, Matthew L. Brooks, Jeanne C. Chambers, and Burton Pendleton Introduction Species conservation has traditionally been based on individual species within the context of their requisite habitat, which is generally defined as the communities and ecosystems deemed necessary for their persistence. Conservation decisions are ham- pered by the fact that environmental stressors that potentially threaten the persistence of species can operate at organizational levels larger than the habitat or home range of a focal species. Resource managers must therefore simultaneously consider local, regional, and/or global scale stressors for effective conservation and management of species of concern. The wide ranging effects associated with global stressors such as climate change may exceed or exacerbate the effects of local or regional stressors. Although resource managers may only be able to directly affect local and regional stressors, they still need to understand the direct and interactive effects of global stressors and ultimately how they affect the lands they manage. Conservation of species in southern Nevada is further complicated by the fact that the region includes one of the largest and fastest growing urban centers in North America. To accomplish the goal of species conserva- tion, resource managers must identify actionable management options that mitigate the effects of local and regional stressors in the context of the effects of global stressors that are beyond their control. Species conservation is typically focused on a subset of species often referred to as species of conservation concern that have either demonstrated considerable decline or are naturally rare or have limited distributions.
  • Late Cenozoic Geomorphic History of Lee Canyon, Spring Mountains, Nevada

    Late Cenozoic Geomorphic History of Lee Canyon, Spring Mountains, Nevada

    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 6-1969 Late Cenozoic geomorphic history of Lee Canyon, Spring Mountains, Nevada John Henry Gucwa Pennsylvania State University - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, and the Sedimentology Commons Repository Citation Gucwa, John Henry, "Late Cenozoic geomorphic history of Lee Canyon, Spring Mountains, Nevada" (1969). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1436. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/3431545 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Pennsylvania State Universiti ( / . The Graduate School Department of Geology and Geophysics Late Cenozoic Geomorphic History of Lee Canyon, Spring Mountains, Nevada A Thesis in ., \ Geology \. \' by I John Henry Gucwa ( Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science June, 1969 · Date of Approval: • Head of the Department~ Geology and Geophysics i ii 1CKNOHLEDGMENTS ( 1be author wishes expressly to thank Dr.
  • Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Visitor Guide

    Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Visitor Guide

    SPRING MOUNTAINS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA 2 0 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 V I S I T O R G U I D E Welcome to the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area This year-round recreation area offers camping, picnicking, hiking, and other activities in the warmer months, and opportunities for snow-based activities in winter. Recreation tips and information in this visitor guide will help you enjoy your visit and protect the Spring Mountains for plants and animals who depend on this “island in the desert.” SPRING MOUNTAINS – MT. CHARLESTON AREA: Visit Kyle and Lee SPRING MOUNTAINS – WEST SIDE: The west side of the Spring Canyons where you will have access to five picnic areas, six developed Mountains, accessed by rugged dirt roads from areas around Pahrump, campgrounds, and over 50 miles of hiking trails, many entering into Cold Creek, and Mountain Springs, offers wide open spaces for off-highway wilderness areas. Paved highways and spectacular scenery create exceptional vehicle (OHV) use and dispersed camping. There are no developed opportunities for scenic driving. campgrounds or picnic areas with restrooms and picnic tables on the west side of the Spring Mountains. HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST • USDA FOREST SERVICE TIPS & MORE HANDY NUMBERS AND WEB SITES EMERGENCY: 911 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department: 702-229-3111 Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Visitor Information: 702-872-5486 or fs.fed.us/r4/htnf/districts/smnra/ Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Administrative Office: 702 -515-5400 Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Fire Information: 702-631-2350 or www.fs.fed.us./r4/htnf/fire/ Nevada Division of Wildlife (hunting and fishing): 702 -486-5127, www.ndow.org Nevada Highway Patrol: 702-486-4100 or www.nhp.nv.gov National Recreation Reservation Service (campground reservations): 877-444-6777 or www.recreation.gov Weather information: www.weather.gov SUGGESTIONS FOR AN ENJOYABLE TRIP PRIVATE PROPERTY Have a full tank of gas.
  • Literature Cited

    Literature Cited

    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volume 9, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991), Bridson (2004), and Bridson and D. W. Brown (http://fmhibd.library.cmu.edu/fmi/iwp/cgi?-db=BPH_Online&-loadframes). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and Stafleu et al. (1992–2009). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”.
  • 160104 ARES BA Revised Per USFWS

    160104 ARES BA Revised Per USFWS

    Biological Assessment ARES Regulation Energy Management Project Prepared For: Bureau of Land Management Southern Nevada District Office 4701 North Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 BEC Environmental, Inc. Prepared By: BEC Environmental, Inc. 7660 West Sahara Avenue 7660 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 150 Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 702.304.9830 October 2014 PO Box 11083 Revised August 2015 Reno, Nevada 89510 775.345.5261 Revised January 2016 www.becnv.com Biological Assessment for ARES REM Project August 2015 Page i of iv Table of Contents ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................... IV 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................. 2 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ACTION AREA .............................. 3 2.1 Proposed Action ................................................................................................. 3 2.1.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.2 Project Timing...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Project
  • Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci

    Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci

    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR
  • Water Resources Data Nevada Water Year 2003

    Water Resources Data Nevada Water Year 2003

    Water Resources Data Nevada Water Year 2003 By Emil L. Stockton, Clifford Z. Jones, Ryan C. Rowland, and Rose L. Medina Water-Data Report NV-03-1 Prepared in Cooperation with the State of Nevada and with other agencies U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director 2003 U.S. Geological Survey 333 West Nye Lane Carson City, NV 89706 (775)887-7600 Information about the USGS, Nevada District is available on the Internet at http://nevada.usgs.gov/ Information about all USGS reports and products is available by calling 1-888-ASK-USGS or on the Internet via the World Wide Web at http://www.usgs.gov/ Additional earth science information is available by accessing the USGS home page at http://www.usgs.gov/ PREFACE This report for Nevada is one of a series of annual reports that document hydrologic data gathered from the U.S. Geological Survey's surface-water and ground-water data-collection networks in each State, Puerto Rico, and the Trust Territories. These records of streams, canals, drains and springs, lakes and reservoirs, and observation wells provide the hydrologic information needed by Federal, State, and local agencies and the private sector for developing and managing our Nation's land and water resources. This report is the culmination of a concerted effort by personnel of the U.S. Geological Survey who collected, analyzed, verified, and organized the data and who typed, edited, and assembled the report.
  • Guide to the Las Vegas Library Regional History Files Collection

    Guide to the Las Vegas Library Regional History Files Collection

    Guide to the Las Vegas Library Regional History Files Collection This finding aid was created by Dianne Esteller, Max Gonzalez, Tammi Kim, Ani Ohanjanyan on September 25, 2017. Persistent URL for this finding aid: http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/f1zg78 © 2017 The Regents of the University of Nevada. All rights reserved. University of Nevada, Las Vegas. University Libraries. Special Collections and Archives. Box 457010 4505 S. Maryland Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-7010 [email protected] Guide to the Las Vegas Library Regional History Files Collection Table of Contents Summary Information ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Contents Note ................................................................................................................................ 3 Arrangement .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................. 4 Names and Subjects ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Collection Inventory ........................................................................................................................................ 5 - Page 2 - Guide to the Las Vegas
  • Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Amendment Covered Species Analysis Report

    Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Amendment Covered Species Analysis Report

    Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Amendment Covered Species Analysis Report Prepared For: Clark County Department of Air Quality Desert Conservation Program 4701 West Russell Blvd., Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89118 WRA Contact: Ken Sanchez (415) 578-3184 [email protected] Patricia Valcarcel (415) 524-7542 [email protected] Date: June 11, 2018 WRA Project: 26346 2169-G East Francisco Blvd., San Rafael, CA 94702 (415) 454-8868 tel [email protected] www.wra-ca.com Draft Covered Species Analysis Report – June 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Draft Covered Species Analysis Report – June 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 SPECIES REVISION PROCESS ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 Species Considered for Coverage ............................................................................ 2 2.2 Criteria for Covered Species ..................................................................................... 3 3.0 ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Species Range ......................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Species Status.......................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Impacts from Covered Activities ..............................................................................