DOCSLIB.ORG

Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Amendment Covered Species Analysis Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Amendment Covered Species Analysis Report Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Amendment Covered Species Analysis Report Prepared For: Clark County Department of Air Quality Desert Conservation Program 4701 West Russell Blvd., Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89118 WRA Contact: Ken Sanchez (415) 578-3184 [email protected] Patricia Valcarcel (415) 524-7542 [email protected] Date: June 11, 2018 WRA Project: 26346 2169-G East Francisco Blvd., San Rafael, CA 94702 (415) 454-8868 tel [email protected] www.wra-ca.com Draft Covered Species Analysis Report – June 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Draft Covered Species Analysis Report – June 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 SPECIES REVISION PROCESS ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 Species Considered for Coverage ............................................................................ 2 2.2 Criteria for Covered Species ..................................................................................... 3 3.0 ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Species Range ......................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Species Status.......................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Impacts from Covered Activities ............................................................................... 5 3.4 Available Data .......................................................................................................... 6 4.0 SPECIES RECOMMENDED FOR COVERAGE UNDER THE AMENDED MSHCP ............. 6 5.0 LITERATUE CITED ............................................................................................................ 12 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Covered, Evaluation, and Watch List Species in the Current MSHCP .......................... 1 Table 2. Species Evaluated and Recommendations .................................................................. 7 Table 3. Animal and Plant Species Recommended for Coverage in the Amended MSHCP ..... 11 APPENDICES Appendix A – Species Recommendation Summaries Appendix B – Table of All Wildlife and Plant Species Reviewed i Draft Covered Species Analysis Report – June 2018 This page intentionally left blank. ii Draft Covered Species Analysis Report – June 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the list of plant and animal species evaluated and recommended for coverage under the proposed amendment to the Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The current MSHCP covers 78 species for take and considers an additional 158 species as evaluation and watch species. This extensive list has proven to be difficult to manage in terms of the implementation and analysis process. The goal of this analysis is to develop a list of species to be covered by the amended MSHCP that focuses on the species most at risk, most likely to be impacted by the covered activities during the life of the plan, and/or most likely to be listed under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). This will allow more conservation dollars to be spent on conservation actions for those species most impacted and at risk. The current list has species for which there are unlikely to be impacts from future covered activities, are not considered at risk, and/or are unlikely to occur in the revised Plan Area. The proposed Plan Area will encompass land below 4,000 feet in elevation. Approximately 50 percent of the species covered under the current plan occur at higher elevations in Clark County (County) (for example, the current list includes species that only occur in the Spring Mountains or Sheep Mountains). The Permittees anticipate that habitat for these species is unlikely to be impacted by covered activities in the MSHCP amendment. Furthermore, the majority of these upper elevation species’ habitats occur on federal lands, which are subject to a permitting process under the ESA undertaken by the federal agencies. Approximately 4 percent of the species covered under the current permit occur in aquatic habitats, which are regulated through other federal and state programs. The types of activities that are covered by the MSHCP amendment are not likely to result in direct impacts to aquatic habitats, so will not be covered by the MSHCP amendment. Table 1. Covered, Evaluation, and Watch List Species in the Current MSHCP Evaluation Watch List Category Covered Species Total Species Species Birds 8 7 15 30 Mammals 4 15 8 27 Amphibians 1 2 3 6 Reptiles 14 7 1 22 Fish 0 8 1 9 Invertebrates 10 34 10 54 Vascular Plants 4 21 10 35 Non-Vascular Plants 37 8 3 48 Total 78 102 51 231 Therefore, the covered species list is being re-evaluated so that the Permittees can more effectively administer meaningful conservation actions and focus the analysis and conservation 1 Draft Covered Species Analysis Report – June 2018 on those species most at risk and directly or indirectly affected by covered activities in the MSHCP amendment. This document presents the results of the species list revision process and is intended to function as a working document that provides the foundation for discussion with the permittees, regulatory agencies, and stakeholders about the species that will be proposed for coverage in the amended Section 10(a)(1)(B) application. This document focuses on 65 species requested for detailed review for inclusion by the County, and Appendix A contains the summary and recommendation for each of the 65 species reviewed. Appendix B provides a table prepared by the County of over 400 species reviewed and from which the 65 species were determined for inclusion in this analysis. 2.0 SPECIES REVISION PROCESS The criteria for determining the covered species list were developed using a step-wise systematic approach for evaluating species based on the following criteria. 2.1 Species Considered for Coverage To identify the covered species, a broad list of plants and animals that occur in the Plan Area was prepared by the County. This analysis drew from the comprehensive list of over 400 species including 231 species addressed by the Clark County MSHCP, previous efforts (PBS&J 2009 and Southwest Ecology 2018), and overall review of species potentially occurring in or near southern Nevada to systematically evaluate the inclusion of these species. The overall species reviewed is provided as Appendix A, and is the source from which the 65 species reviewed in this document is based. In addition, other species that merited consideration based on recent status or scientific information from a variety of sources were included in the revised evaluation matrix. Information used included but was not limited to: • Species listed or proposed for listing as threatened or endangered under the federal ESA; • Candidates for future listing as threatened or endangered under the federal ESA; • Plant species fully protected by the State of Nevada (Nevada Administrative Code: NAC 527 including revisions); • Mammals, birds, fish, amphibians, and reptiles listed as protected, endangered, or sensitive by the State of Nevada (Nevada Administrative Code: NAC 503); • Nevada Natural Heritage Program Plant and Animal Watch and Track Lists (NNHP 2017a and 2017b); • Nevada Natural Heritage Program Climate Change Vulnerability Index (NNHP 2012); • Nevada Wildlife Action Plan (Wildlife Action Plan Team 2012); • U.S. Forest Service Region 4 Sensitive Species List (USFS 2016); • Bureau of Land Management Nevada Sensitive Species Lists (2011, 2017); • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Birds of Conservation Concern Region 8 (2008) 2 Draft Covered Species Analysis Report – June 2018 • Great Basin Bird Observatory Nevada Comprehensive Bird Conservation Plan (2010); • The Nature Conservancy’s “Conservation Management Strategy for Nine Low Elevation Plants in Clark County” (2007); • Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of Wild Fauna and Flora list (2017); • International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species version 3.1; and • For species occurring outside Clark County, their Federal and/or State status in adjacent states. 2.2 Criteria for Covered Species Several criteria were applied to the list of special-status species that could occur in the amended Plan Area to determine which species should be covered by the MSHCP Amendment. Species recommended for coverage by the MSHCP Amendment should meet any of the criteria but more likely meet several of the criteria. Range The species is known to occur, or is likely to occur, within the Plan Area based on credible evidence, or the species is not currently known in the Plan Area but is expected in the Plan Area during the permit term (e.g., through range expansion, recovery actions, or reintroduction to historic range). Status The species meets at least one of following the status criteria: • Listed under the federal ESA as threatened or endangered, proposed or candidate; • State listed as protected, fully protected, threatened, or endangered (not sensitive) under NAC 503 (wildlife) or 527 (flora); or • Potentially or likely to be listed under state or federal statutes within the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit term (assumed to be 50 years). Potential for listing during the permit term is based on current listing status, consultation with experts,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Rinconada Checklist-02Jun19
    Checklist1 of Vascular Flora of Rinconada Mine and Rinconada Trail San Luis Obispo County, California (2 June 2019) David J. Keil Robert F. Hoover Herbarium Biological Sciences Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, California Scientific Name Common Name Family Rare n ❀ Achyrachaena mollis blow wives ASTERACEAE o n ❀ Acmispon americanus var. americanus Spanish-clover FABACEAE o n Acmispon brachycarpus shortpod deervetch FABACEAE v n ❀ Acmispon glaber var. glaber common deerweed FABACEAE o n Acmispon parviflorus miniature deervetch FABACEAE o n ❀ Acmispon strigosus strigose deer-vetch FABACEAE o 1 Please notify the author of additions or corrections to this list ([email protected]). ❀ — See Wildflowers of San Luis Obispo, California, second edition (2018) for photograph. Most are illustrated in the first edition as well; old names for some species in square brackets. n — California native i — exotic species, introduced to California, naturalized or waif. v — documented by one or more specimens (Consortium of California Herbaria record; specimen in OBI; or collection that has not yet been accessioned) o — observed during field surveys; no voucher specimen known Rare—California Rare Plant Rank Scientific Name Common Name Family Rare n Acmispon wrangelianus California deervetch FABACEAE v n ❀ Acourtia microcephala sacapelote ASTERACEAE o n ❀ Adelinia grandis Pacific hound's tongue BORAGINACEAE v n ❀ Adenostoma fasciculatum var. chamise ROSACEAE o fasciculatum n Adiantum jordanii California maidenhair fern PTERIDACEAE o n Agastache urticifolia nettle-leaved horsemint LAMIACEAE v n ❀ Agoseris grandiflora var. grandiflora large-flowered mountain-dandelion ASTERACEAE v n Agoseris heterophylla var. cryptopleura annual mountain-dandelion ASTERACEAE v n Agoseris heterophylla var. heterophylla annual mountain-dandelion ASTERACEAE o i Aira caryophyllea silver hairgrass POACEAE o n Allium fimbriatum var.
    [Show full text]
  • How Many of Cassini Anagrams Should There Be? Molecular
    TAXON 59 (6) • December 2010: 1671–1689 Galbany-Casals & al. • Systematics and phylogeny of the Filago group How many of Cassini anagrams should there be? Molecular systematics and phylogenetic relationships in the Filago group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae), with special focus on the genus Filago Mercè Galbany-Casals,1,3 Santiago Andrés-Sánchez,2,3 Núria Garcia-Jacas,1 Alfonso Susanna,1 Enrique Rico2 & M. Montserrat Martínez-Ortega2 1 Institut Botànic de Barcelona (CSIC-ICUB), Pg. del Migdia s.n., 08038 Barcelona, Spain 2 Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain 3 These authors contributed equally to this publication. Author for correspondence: Mercè Galbany-Casals, [email protected] Abstract The Filago group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae) comprises eleven genera, mainly distributed in Eurasia, northern Africa and northern America: Ancistrocarphus, Bombycilaena, Chamaepus, Cymbolaena, Evacidium, Evax, Filago, Logfia, Micropus, Psilocarphus and Stylocline. The main morphological character that defines the group is that the receptacular paleae subtend, and more or less enclose, the female florets. The aims of this work are, with the use of three chloroplast DNA regions (rpl32-trnL intergenic spacer, trnL intron, and trnL-trnF intergenic spacer) and two nuclear DNA regions (ITS, ETS), to test whether the Filago group is monophyletic; to place its members within Gnaphalieae using a broad sampling of the tribe; and to investigate in detail the phylogenetic relationships among the Old World members of the Filago group and provide some new insight into the generic circumscription and infrageneric classification based on natural entities. Our results do not show statistical support for a monophyletic Filago group.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List
    Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Abronia turbinata Torr. ex S. Consortium of California Turbinate Sand-verbena A/PH Nyctaginaceae 2 Watson Herbaria Acanthoscyphus parishii var. abramsii (E.A. McGregor) Consortium of California Abrams' Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 1B.2 4-5 Reveal [synonym: Oxytheca Herbaria parishii var. abramsii] Acanthoscyphus parishii Consortium of California Parish Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 4.2 1 (Parry) Small var. parishii Herbaria Acmispon glaber var. Consortium of California brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet Short Deerweed PH Fabaceae 1 Herbaria Acmispon heermannii Heermann Lotus or Consortium of California (Durand & Hilg.) Brouillet var. PH Fabaceae 4 Hosackia Herbaria heermannii Acmispon heermannii var. Roundleaf Heermann Consortium of California PH Fabaceae 1 orbicularis (A. Gray) Brouillet Lotus or Hosackia Herbaria Acmispon junceus (Bentham) Consortium of California Rush Hosackia AH Fabaceae 2 Brouillet var. junceus Herbaria 1 Locally Important Plant List- Dec. 2018 Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Acmispon micranthus (Torrey Consortium of California Grab Hosackia or Lotus AH Fabaceae 3 & A. Gray) Brouillet Herbaria Acmispon parviflorus Consortium of California Tiny Lotus AH Fabaceae 2 (Bentham) D.D. Sokoloff Herbaria Consortium of California Agrostis hallii Vasey Hall's Bentgrass PG Poaceae 1 Herbaria Common or Broadleaf Consortium of California Alisma plantago-aquaticum L. PH Alismataceae 4 Water-plantain Herbaria Consortium of California Allium amplectens Torrey Narrowleaf Onion PG Alliaceae 1 Herbaria Allium denticulatum (Traub) Consortium of California Dentate Fringed Onion PG Alliaceae 1 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • November-On the Dry Side 2017
    ON THE DRY SIDE NOVEMBER 2017 NOVEMBER 2017 On the Dry Side Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Area Cactus & Succulent Society Contents President’s Message President’s Message ........................ 1 Our bylaws provide for elections in odd-numbered years of board members Contents ........................................ 1 for two-year terms. This issue of On the Dry Side includes the nominations MBACSS Board Election ................ 2 for members of the board of directors, as preparation for additional November Program ......................... 3 nominations from the floor and elections during our November meeting. Mini-show for November ................ 4 Newly elected officers will be seated at the December meeting. Members’ Gardens .......................... 5 The nominees are presented on p. 2 of this newsletter. Please look at these More About Agaves ........................ 6 candidates, and consider nominating any additional candidates, including Solitary (or nearly so) Agaves .......... 6 your self during the meeting. This society, like all community organizations, MBACSS Calendar for 2017 ............ 7 values the active participation of its members, and welcomes those who Succulent Glory .............................. 8 step forward to serve in positions of leadership. Member Update .............................. 9 Officers & Chairpersons ................... 9 Our October meeting occurred during the cactus & succulent sale season, and specifically on the same weekend as the San Jose CCS’s sale. Several board members were actively participating in that sale and unavailable to attend our meeting, so we cancelled the October meeting of the board. Accordingly, this newsletter does not include minutes of a board meeting. Save the Date! MBACSS Meets Board Meets Future Meetings Mexican Grass Tree Dasylirion longissimum Nov. 19, 2017 Nov. 19, 2017 Third Sundays UC Botanical Garden Gathering @ 12:00 Board @ 11:00 Veterans of Foreign at Berkeley Wars, Post 1716 Potluck @ 12:30 Members always 1960 Freedom Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Blooming & Dying
    BLOOMING & DYING: AGAVE WITHIN TUCSON’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT Item Type text; poster; thesis Authors McGuire, Grace Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the College of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture, and the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 11:24:53 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/632206 1 | Page BLOOMING & DYING AGAVE WITHIN TUCSON’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT: PROPAGATION, PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS, AND DESIGN BY GRACE KATHLEEN MCGUIRE ____________________ A Thesis Submitted to The Honors College In Partial Fulfillment of the Bachelors degree With Honors in Sustainable Built Environments THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA M A Y 2 0 1 9 2 | Page Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Literature Review .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Urban Landscape Theory – Phoenix, AZ as a Nearby Case Study ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AN ABSTRACT of the THESIS of J. Andrew Alexander for the Degree
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF J. Andrew Alexander for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on November 7, 2007 . Title: A Taxonomic Revision of Astragalus mokiacensis and Allied Taxa within the Astragalus lentiginosus Complex of Section Diphysi . Abstract approved: _______________________________________________ Aaron I. Liston North America, with over 400 species of Astragalus (Fabaceae), is one of three major centers of diversity, all of which comprise the majority of the nearly 1750 species of Astragalus worldwide. One of the most diverse species, Astragalus lentiginosus of Section Diphysi , is a polymorphic complex of over 40 varieties, ranging from the West Coast to Texas and the Rocky Mountains. Palantia was a sectional name within the genus Tium used by Rydberg for taxa formerly reduced by Jones to varieties of A. lentiginosus. They share cylindrical pods that, unlike the rest of A. lentiginosus , do not become bladdery inflated upon maturity. The Palantia, in a modern interpretation, consists of A. mokiacensis and A. bryantii plus the other scarcely inflated varieties of A. lentiginosus , primarily A. lentiginosus var. maricopae , A. lentiginosus var. palans , A. lentiginosus var. ursinus , and A. lentiginosus var. wilsonii . Every major revision has delimited these taxa differently. A principal coordinates analysis of morphological data from herbarium specimens was used to determine the affinities between type specimens and extant populations of these taxa and to determine the degree of morphological similarity among these taxa. For the genetic analysis, highly polymorphic cpDNA microsatellites were selected due to their applicability to both genetic and phylogenetic questions across a wide range of taxonomic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds
    c.^,y ^r-^ 1 Ag84te DA Chewing and Sucking United States Lice as Parasites of Department of Agriculture IVIammals and Birds Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1849 July 1997 0 jc: United States Department of Agriculture Chewing and Sucking Agricultural Research Service Lice as Parasites of Technical Bulletin Number IVIammals and Birds 1849 July 1997 Manning A. Price and O.H. Graham U3DA, National Agrioultur«! Libmry NAL BIdg 10301 Baltimore Blvd Beltsvjlle, MD 20705-2351 Price (deceased) was professor of entomoiogy, Department of Ento- moiogy, Texas A&iVI University, College Station. Graham (retired) was research leader, USDA-ARS Screwworm Research Laboratory, Tuxtia Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. ABSTRACT Price, Manning A., and O.H. Graham. 1996. Chewing This publication reports research involving pesticides. It and Sucking Lice as Parasites of Mammals and Birds. does not recommend their use or imply that the uses U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesti- 1849, 309 pp. cides must be registered by appropriate state or Federal agencies or both before they can be recommended. In all stages of their development, about 2,500 species of chewing lice are parasites of mammals or birds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication More than 500 species of blood-sucking lice attack may be obtained at no cost from Dr. O.H. Graham, only mammals. This publication emphasizes the most USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 969, Mission, TX 78572. Copies frequently seen genera and species of these lice, of this publication may be purchased from the National including geographic distribution, life history, habitats, Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, ecology, host-parasite relationships, and economic Springfield, VA 22161.
    [Show full text]