Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
Tumor Suppressor Activity of Klotho in Breast Cancer is Revealed by Structure-function Analysis
Hagai Ligumsky1, 2#, Tami Rubinek1, Keren Merenbakh-Lamin1, 2, Adva Yeheskel3, Rotem Sertchook4, Shiri Shahmoon1, 2, Sarit Aviel-Ronen5 and Ido Wolf1, 2
1 The Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel; 2Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 3Bioinformatics Unit, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; 4Bioinformatics and Biologial Computing Unit, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. 5Department of Pathology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Running title: Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Ido Wolf, Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel. Phone: 972-52-736-0558 FAX : 972-3- 697-3030. E-mail: [email protected]
# This work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree.
Key words: klotho, breast cancer, KL1, KL2, glucuronidase
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
1
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
Abstract
Klotho is a transmembrane protein containing two internal repeats, KL1 and
KL2, both display significant homology to members of the β-glycosidase family. Klotho is
expressed in the kidney, brain and various endocrine tissues, but can also be cleaved
and act as a circulating hormone. Klotho is an essential cofactor for binding of fibroblast
growth factor 23 (FGF23) to the FGF receptor and can also inhibit the insulin-like growth
factor-1 (IGF-1) pathway. Data from a wide array of malignancies indicate klotho as a
tumor suppressor; however, the structure-function relationships governing its tumor
suppressor activities have not been deciphered.
Here the tumor suppressor activities of the KL1 and KL2 domains were
examined. Overexpression of either klotho or KL1, but not of KL2, inhibited colony
formation by MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Moreover, in vivo administration of KL1 was
not only well tolerated but significantly slowed tumor formation in nude mice. Further
studies indicated that KL1, but not KL2, interacted with the IGF-1R and inhibited the IGF-
1 pathway. Based on computerized structural modeling, klotho constructs were
generated in which critical amino acids have been mutated. Interestingly, the mutated
proteins retained their tumor suppressor activity but showed reduced ability to modulate
FGF23 signaling.
These data indicate differential activity of the klotho domains, KL1 and KL2, in
breast cancer, and reveal that the tumor suppressor activities of klotho can be dissected
from its physiologic activities.
Implications: These findings pave the way for a rational design of safe klotho-based
molecules for the treatment of breast cancer.
2
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
Introduction
Klotho (α-klotho) is a transmembrane protein expressed in the distal convoluted
tubules of the kidneys and the choroid plexus, as well as in various endocrine and
exocrine tissues (1), but it can also be cleaved, shed and act as a circulating hormone
(2, 3). Klotho-deficient mice manifest a syndrome resembling human aging, while
overexpression of klotho extends lifespan (1, 4). Major physiologic activities of klotho
include regulation of phosphate and calcium homeostasis as well as of metabolic activity
(5-7). To date, several mechanisms of action of klotho have been described. Klotho is an
essential co-factor for binding of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 23 to the FGF receptor
(FGFRs) (5, 8), it modulates bFGF signaling (9, 10), inhibits the insulin and the insulin-
like growth factor (IGF)-1 pathways (4, 9) and regulates the activity of the transient
receptor potential vanilloid type 5 (TRPV5) calcium channel (11, 12). The common link
between these diverse activities has not been elucidated yet.
In the past years klotho has emerged as a potent tumor suppressor in a wide
array of malignancies including breast, pancreas, colon, gastric and lung cancers, as
well as in melanoma (9, 10, 13-16). We have previously shown that klotho is abundantly
expressed in normal breast and pancreatic tissues and that upon malignant
transformation its expression is reduced (9, 10, 17). Restoring klotho expression, or
treatment with the soluble protein, inhibited proliferation of breast and pancreatic cancer
cells (9, 10), and further studies indicated it as an inhibitor of the IGF-1 pathway (4, 9).
Mouse klotho is a 1014 amino-acid long protein (1). Its intracellular domain is
composed of ten amino acids and has no known functional role (1). The extracellular
domain is composed of a signal sequence (SS), responsible for directing the protein to
the cell surface, and two internal repeats, KL1 and KL2, each about 450-amino acids
long (1), which exhibit only weak similarity to each other (21% amino-acid identity) (1).
The discrete activities of each domain have not been well-characterized yet. Cleavage of 3
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
the extracellular domain of klotho can yield either the entire extracellular domain
(130kDa), or the discrete domains KL1 and KL2 (2, 18, 19). While only the full-length
protein can serve as a co-factor for the activity of FGF23 (5, 8), either the full-length
protein or KL1 can inhibit proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells (10).
Each klotho domain displays significant homology to members of the glycoside
hydrolase family 1 enzymes (1). Two glutamic acid residues are required for the
enzymatic activity of family 1 β-glycosidases, one acts as a nucleophile and the other as
an acid/base catalyst (20). While these critical amino acids are not conserved in klotho,
klotho was shown to hydrolyze β-glycoside and β-d-glucuronide (20). In support of these
activities, mutations of critical amino acids, considered to be essential for its enzymatic
activity, abolished the ability of klotho to increase TRPV5 currents (11). Yet, these
mutations did not affect its ability to inhibit Wnt signaling. To our knowledge, the role of
these residues in mediating klotho tumor suppressor activities has not been studied yet.
We aimed to decipher klotho structure-function relationships that are involved in
mediating its tumor suppressor activities in breast cancer. Our findings demonstrate that
KL1, but not KL2, can inhibit growth of breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Structural
modeling and site-directed mutagenesis indicate that amino acids, essential for
modulation of FGF23 signaling, are not required for klotho tumor suppressor activity.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and antibodies
The chemicals used were FGF23, IGF-1 and soluble human KL1 (hKL1)
(PeproTech Inc, Rocky Hill, NJ), and G418 (Invitrogen). Antibodies used were phospho-
AKT1 (S473), phospho-IGF-IR (Y1131), total pan-AKT (Cell Signaling Technology),
diphosphorylated-Thr183/Tyr185 and total-ERK1/2 (Sigma) and HA (Covance). Anti-
4
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
klotho antibodies directed against KL1 domain (KM2076) and KL2 domain (KM2119)
were a kind gift from Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd.
Cells and transfections
MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and HEK-293 cells were obtained from the American Type
Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA).Cells were received from Dr. Hadassa
Degani's lab at Weizmann Institute of Science, which obtained them directly from the
ATCC and were not passaged more than 6 months after resuscitation. All transfections
used Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen).
Structural model construction of KL1 and KL2 domains
Template structures for molecular modeling human klotho were selected by
BLAST search against the PDB. The BLAST search suggested the structures of the
human Cytosolic Neutral beta-Glycosylceramidase (Klotho-related Protein, KLrP) as best
template (42% sequence identity to KL1 domain and 33% to KL2 domain). A crystal
structure of KLrP with highest resolution (1.60 Å) and good stereochemistry was
selected (PDB entry 2E9L). Structural model of KL1 was built using PDB 2E9L (21) as a
template. The template was selected using HHPRED (22), The model was built using
Modeller (23). The model structure was refined using the Rosetta Relax protocol (v. 3.2)
(24). KL1 model was assessed using ModFold (25) and ConSurf (26), using a multiple
sequence alignment of 150 KL1 homologs collected from Uniprot (27) using Blast (28)
and aligned with Mafft (29). Structural model of KL2 was based on a sequence
alignment between KL2 domain, the template structure and 14 representative
sequences of family 1 Glycoside hydrolase, which was carried out using several multiple
alignment algorithms (Expresso, Promals3D and FFAS03). A set of 20 all-atoms model
of KL2 was built using the restrained-based modeling approach as implemented in the
program MODELLER 9V6 based on the different alignments. The model was evaluated 5
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
using MODELLER objective function, DOPE, ProSA and Anolea. The model showing the
best score as judged by these evaluation methods was saved for further studies and
presented here.
Generation of klotho expression constructs
Mouse HA-tagged full-length klotho (FL-KL) in pcDNA3.1 was a generous gift
from Y Nabeshima (Kyoto University, Japan). Mouse KL1 and KL2 constructs were
prepared in two steps, in order to contain the original FL-KL signal sequence (SS). For
the first step the SS was PCR amplified and restriction sites were introduced using
specific primers
5-ATCGAATTCATGCTAGCCCGCGCCCCTCCT-3 (EcoRI), and
5-ATCAAGCTTGGCGCGCAGGGCGAGCAGCAG-3 (HindIII). KL1 and KL2 were PCR
amplified and restriction sites were introduced using specific primers. For KL1 –5-
ATCAAGCTTATGCGCTGCCTGAGCGC-3 (HindIII) and
5-ATCCTCGAGTCTCTTCTTGGCTACAACCC-3 (Xho). For KL2 –
5-ATCAAGCTTAAACCTTACTGTGTTGATTTC-3 and
5-ATCCTCGAGTCTCTTCTTGGCTACAACCC-3 (Xho). Plasmids were digested with the
suitable enzymes and the SS was ligated to KL1 and KL2. Subsequently the constructs
were sequenced for verification and subcloned into pcDNA3.1 backbone.
Mouse KL1 with Intra-cytoplasmic/Trans membrane (IC/TM) was prepared as followed:
at first an IC/TM fragment was PCR amplified and restriction sites were introduced using
specific primers: 5'-ATCCTCGAGTCTTTGCTGGTCTTCATC-3' (XhoI)
and 5'-GATCTCGAGCTTATAACTTCTCTGGCC-3' (XhoI). Then the fragment and KL1
plasmid were digested with the suitable enzymes and the IC/TM was ligated to KL1.
Human FL-KL (hFL-KL) in pEF and human full-length without IC/TM (hFL-KL ΔIC/TM)
was a generous gift from M Kuro-O (UT Southwestern, USA).
Directed mutagenesis of klotho putative enzymatic active site
6
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
Prior to mutagenesis, constructs were transferred to a Topo plasmid to preserve
the HA-tag. The selected amino acids for substitution were chosen in order to preserve
the 3-dimensional conformation of the molecule. First, a single mutation was made at
amino acid 416 by converting Glu to Gln. FL-KL and KL1 Constructs were PCR amplified
using specific primers for mutation insertion: 5-GGA ATA TTT ATT GTG CAA AAT GGC
TGG-3 (mutation insertion) and 5-CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3.
Afterwards, double mutation constructs were made by adding a second mutation at
residue 240 by converting Asp to Asn. For the second mutation, site directed
mutagenesis technique was employed. Constructs were PCR amplified using specific
primers for mutation insertion: 5-
CACCATTAACAACCCCTACGTGGTGGCCTGGCACG-3 and 5-
AGGGGTTGTTAATGGTGATCCAGTACTTGACCTGACCACCG-3.
Colony assays
Two days following transfection with the indicated plasmids, G418 (750 μg/mL for
all cell lines) was added to the culture media. At day 14, cells were stained using crystal
violet (Sigma) and quantitated using ImageJ software.
Western blot analysis
Cells were harvested, lysed and total protein was extracted with RIPA buffer
(50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.25% Na-deoxycholate, 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM NaF) together with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Lysates were
resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Band
intensities were quantified using ImageJ software.
Immunoprecipitation
MCF-7 cells were harvested as described above, and 400 μg protein lysate were
incubated with protein A/G (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) beads at 4°C for 1 hour to
eliminate nonspecifically bound proteins. These beads were subsequently used as a
7
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
negative control. The supernatants were then incubated with 2 mg anti-HA antibody
(Sigma) for 4 h and then protein A/G was added. Following an overnight incubation, the
beads were washed six times in RIPA buffer and the immunoprecipitated materials were
separated by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by western blotting.
Mice tumor xenograft studies
Mice maintenance and experiments were carried out under institutional
guidelines of the Sheba Medical Center. Experiments were conducted as described (30).
Six-week-old female athymic nude mice were injected with 0.75×106 MDA-MB-231 cells
subcutaneously into both flanks. After five days, mice were treated with daily intra-
peritoneal (I.P) injections of soluble hKL1: 10 μg/kg, or saline (n = 6 per group). Tumor
size was measured weekly with a digital caliper, and the volume was estimated using the
equation V = (a × b2)×0.5236, where a is the larger dimension and b the perpendicular
diameter.
Immunohistochemistry analysis
After mice were euthanized, tumors were removed and fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde (PFA). Paraffin-embedded tumors were serially sectioned and stained
with hematoxylin & eosin (H&E), and immunohistochemically stained for Ki-67 and
vimentin. Stained sections were examined microscopically by an experienced
pathologist. For plasma analyses, immediately after mice were euthanized, blood was
drawn from the heart and plasma was analyzed at the automated blood lab, Sheba
Medical Center.
Statistical analysis
Results are presented as mean ± SD. Continuous variables were compared
using t test. All significance tests were 2-tailed and a P < 0.05 was considered as
statistically significant.
8
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
Results
Structural modeling of the KL1 and KL2 domains
We generated a computational structure model of KL1 and KL2 domains based
on similarity of klotho to KLrP (Figure 1A). Crystallographic studies indicated KLrP as a
classic family 1 glycoside hydrolases that display the Koshland retaining mechanism.
Two glutamic residues serve as its catalytic residues: Glu-373 is the nucleophile and
Glu-165 is the acid/base catalyst. The model indicate that both KL1 domain (residues
57-506) and KL2 domain (residues 515-953) share significant homology to glycoside
hydrolase family 1 and are predicted to have similar TIM-Barrel fold (31) (Figure 1A).
According to the model, Glu-414 in KL1 domain can serve as the nucleophilic residue
(Figure 1B). While the corresponding residue to the acid/base catalyst Glu-165 is Asn-
239, which cannot serve as an acid/base catalyst, Asp-238 may function as an
alternative acid/base catalyst and it is in the required distance from the nucleophile (2Ǻ).
Thus, KL1 may serve as an active enzyme. In KL2, on the other hand, the critical
nucleophilic residue (Glu-373) is replaced by Ser-872, which cannot serve as the
nucleophilic residue (Figure 1C). Thus, the model suggests that KL2 is not an active
glycoside hydrolase.
KL1 inhibits colony formation and suppresses in vivo growth of breast cancer
cells
In order to evaluate the differential activities of KL1 and KL2, we constructed
expression vectors of KL1 and KL2 domain, both with a signal sequence, directing them
to the membrane (Figure 2A and B) and enabling them to be secreted (Supplementary
Fig. S1). The effect of overexpression of these domains on growth of breast cancer cells
was assessed using colony formation assays. MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer
cells were transfected with either klotho, KL1 or KL2 expression vectors or an empty 9
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
vector. Transfected cells were cultured in media containing G418 for two weeks and
stained to determine the number of surviving colonies. Klotho and KL1 expression
significantly reduced the number and size of surviving colonies, while KL2 showed only a
modest effect (Figure 2C and D). The tumor suppressor activity of KL1 was also verified
in vivo. For this study, MDA-MB-231 cells were injected to both flanks of athymic mice
and mice were treated with daily I.P injections of either control vehicle (n = 6) or soluble
hKL1 (10 µg/kg, n= 6), for 4 weeks. Already after 12 days of treatment, a significant
inhibition of tumor growth was noted among KL1-treated mice (p< 0.001, for comparison
of tumor volume between the control and hKL1 -treated group), lasting to the end of the
experiment (Figure 3A). Tumor weight at the end of the experiment was significantly
lower (p<0.003) in hKL1-treated group (Figure 3B and C). Immunohistochemistry
analysis revealed a significant reduction in the number of cells expressing the
proliferation marker Ki67 and the mesenchymal marker vimentin, suggesting effect of
KL1 on proliferation, as well as differentiation (Figure 3D). Importantly, KL1 treatment
was safe and did not affect the weight of mice (Figure 3A) and was associated with
higher albumin levels and reduced liver function tests and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
(Table 1).
Differential modulation of IGF-1 signaling by KL1 and KL2
We have previously shown that klotho efficiently suppresses activation of the
IGF-1 pathway and interacts with the IGF-1R in breast cancer cells (9). In order to
analyze the differential effects of KL1 and KL2 on IGF-1 signaling, MCF-7 cells were
transfected with either klotho, KL1 or KL2 expression vectors or an empty vector, starved
for 48 hours, treated with IGF-1 (100 ng/ml, 15 min) and analyzed using Western blotting
for the level of expression and phosphorylation of IGF-1R, AKT and ERK1/2. KL1 as well
as full length klotho reduced IGF-1-induced phosphorylation of these proteins, while KL2
10
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
had only minor effect (Figure 4A). Co-IP assays using MCF-7 cells expressing either
klotho, KL1 or KL2, indicated that only klotho and KL1 can interact with the endogenous
IGF-1R (Figure 4B).
Only full-length, membrane bound klotho can transduce FGF23 signaling
Membrane-bound klotho is an essential co-factor for activation of the FGFRs by
FGF23 (8). To our knowledge, the ability of KL1 and KL2 to modulate FGF23 signaling
has not been determined yet. In order to test this, MCF-7 and HEK293 cells were
transfected with either klotho, KL1 or KL2 expression vectors or an empty vector, starved
for 48 hours, treated with FGF23 (100 ng/ml, 15 min), and analyzed using Western
blotting for the level of expression and phosphorylation of ERK1/2. Neither KL1 nor KL2
were able to mediate FGF23-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Figure 4C). Removing
the IC/TM domain (FL-KL-ΔIC/TM) which anchors klotho to the cell membrane also
impaired its ability to transduce FGF23 signal (Figure 4D).
In order to test if membrane-bound KL1 can mediate FGF23 signaling we
generated a KL1 domain fused with the IC/TM region of klotho (KL1-IC/TM, Figure 2A).
HEK 293 cells were transfected with these constructs, serum starved for 48 hours,
stimulated with either a vehicle or 100ng/ml FGF23 for 15 min and analyzed using
Western blotting for the phosphorylation of ERK1/2. KL1-IC/TM failed to transduce the
FGF23 signal (Figure 4D).
Glu-416 and Asp-240 are not required for klotho tumor suppressor activity
Mutations of klotho putative active sites abolished its effect on TRPV5 and on the
renal phosphate transporter NaPi-2a (11, 32, 33) but did not affect its ability to inhibit
Wnt signaling (34). To our knowledge, the role of these residues in mediating klotho
tumor suppressor activities has not been studied yet. In order to decipher the role of
11
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
these amino acids in mediating the tumor suppressor activity of klotho, a series of mouse
klotho and KL1 constructs were designed, in which amino-acids have been mutated.
Glu-416 (putative nucleophile, corresponds to human Glu-414) was converted to
glutamine and Asp-240 (putative acid/base catalyst, corresponds to human Glu-238)
was converted to asparagine (Figure 1B). These mutations are not expected to alter the
tertiary structure of the protein. The ability of the various mutated proteins to inhibit
colony formation of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells was determined as described above.
In both breast cancer cell lines the mutated klotho constructs, FL-KL or KL1, harboring
single (416) or double (240-416) mutations, retained the anti-proliferative effect exhibited
by klotho. Surprisingly, the mutated klotho and KL1 proteins displayed even a more
potent anti-proliferative activity compared to their wild-type counterparts. For example in
MCF-7 cells, FL-KL, FL-KL-416 and FL-KL-240-416 reduced number of colonies to 61%,
37% and 45% of control, respectively (Figure 5A). In MDA-MB 231 cells FL-KL, FL-KL-
416 and FL-KL-240-416 reduced number of colonies to 32%, 18% and 16% of control,
respectively (Figure 5 B).
Dissecting klotho tumor suppressor activities from its physiologic activities may
enable the development of safe klotho-based therapies. We, therefore, aimed to study
whether klotho mutant, which potently slow proliferation of cancer cells, can modulate
FGF23 signaling. As only FL-KL can function as a co-factor for FGF23 (Figure 4C and
D), we analyzed only FL-KL mutants. To this aim, HEK293 cells were transfected with
either FL-KL, FL-KL-416 and FL-KL-240-416 expression vectors or an empty vector,
starved for 48 hours, treated with FGF23 (100 ng/ml, 15 min), and analyzed using
Western blotting for the level of expression and phosphorylation of ERK1/2. While the
WT-FL KL-416 was able to mediate FGF23-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Figure
5C), transfection with FL-KL-240-416 only partially increased ERK phosphorylation
(Figure 5C).
12
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
Discussion
This structure-function analysis of klotho in breast cancer indicates KL1 as
sufficient to mediate growth inhibition, while KL2 does not have a significant tumor
suppressor activity. Furthermore, our data suggest that the activity of KL1, as well as of
the full-length protein, is independent of the amino acids of its putative catalytic site.
Distinct activities of klotho, KL1 and KL2 have been demonstrated in several
systems. The FGF23 co-receptor function is mediated only by full length, membrane-
anchored klotho (5, 8) (Figure 3C and D). On the other hand, either KL1 or KL2 were
sufficient to activate TRPV5 (11). In contrast, several klotho activities were shown to be
KL1-dependent. Thus, it was demonstrated that KL1 is essential and sufficient to
mediate the anti-inflammatory activity of klotho in senescent cells while KL2 did not show
any such activity (35). Similarly, KL1 is mandatory and sufficient to inhibit Wnt signaling
by klotho, while KL2 is devoid of this activity (34). Our data suggest that klotho tumor
suppressor activities are KL1-dependent and that KL2 by itself cannot significantly inhibit
proliferation of breast cancer cells.
Administration of KL1 slowed tumor formation by breast cancer cells in nude
mice. Tumors from KL1-treated mice were smaller, showed reduced proliferation and
reduced expression of the EMT marker vimentin. Furthermore, their blood albumin levels
were higher and LDH levels lower compared to control-treated mice. Treatment did not
adversely affect either weight or kidney functions. This favorable toxicity profile can be
attributed to the inability of KL1 to serve as a co-receptor for FGF23. These data support
our previous observation using pancreatic cancer cells (10) and suggest that treatment
with KL1 is safe and may serve as an effective novel strategy for the treatment of breast
cancer.
13
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
While ample data indicate klotho as a potent tumor suppressor in a wide array of
malignancies (9, 10, 15, 16, 36), its precise mechanism of action is still a matter of
debate. Mechanisms implicated in its tumor suppressor activities include inhibition of
insulin and IGF-1 signaling, modulation of FGF signaling and inhibition of Wnt signaling
(4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 15, 37). We noted a correlation between the ability to inhibit the IGF-1
pathway, interaction with the IGF-1R and inhibition of proliferation. Thus, klotho and KL1
slowed proliferation, interacted with the IGF-1R and inhibited the IGF-1 pathway.
Conversely, KL2, which did not slow proliferation, did not inhibit the pathway or
interacted with the receptor. These data provide an indirect support to the hypothesis
that inhibition of the IGF-1 pathway is a major mediator of klotho activities in breast
cancer. Interestingly, the same klotho region required for tumor suppression is the one
required for the inhibition of the IGF-1 pathway and of Wnt signaling (10, 34). Thus, it is
possible that a common mechanism that involves inhibition of the Wnt and IGF-1
signaling pathways is responsible to klotho tumor suppressor activities.
While klotho enables activation of the FGFR pathway by FGF23, it inhibits
activation of the IGF-1 pathway. Thus, treatment with klotho can lead to either activation
or inhibition of the ERK pathway, the downstream effector of both pathways. While this
may seem to be counterintuitive, it is important to note that the activity of the ERK
pathway is tissue and cell type-dependent (38). The ERK pathway regulates a wide
array of physiologic and pathologic processes, including proliferation, development and
metabolism, and while in the kidneys, as a downstream effector of FGF23 signaling it
participates in regulating phosphorus homeostasis (39), in cancer cells it enhances
proliferation as a downstream effector of multiple growth factors, including IGF-1 (40).
Furthermore, the effect of klotho on various tyrosine kinase receptors is also complex.
While klotho enhances activation of FGFRs by FGF23 (5, 8) either klotho or KL1 inhibit
activation of the FGFRs by bFGF (10). As klotho regulates glycosylation pattern of
14
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
various membrane proteins (33, 41), it is possible that some of its activities are mediated
by regulating glycosylation pattern of the IGF-1R and FGFRs.
MCF-7 cells express somewhat higher klotho levels compared to MDA-MB-231
cells (9). Yet, MCF-7 cells are more sensitive to the tumorigenic effects of IGF-1 (42-45).
These data suggest a resistance to endogenous klotho in MCF-7 cells. The mechanisms
mediating this resistance to endogenous klotho remain to be elucidated. The IGF-1
signaling may play a less prominent role in MDA-MB-231 cells (44), and other signaling
pathways, including Wnt signaling, are important mediators of tumorigenesis in these
cells. As klotho is a potent inhibitor of Wnt signaling in other malignancies, it is possible
that some of its effects in breast cancer are mediating by affecting Wnt signaling (37,
46).
Several studies demonstrated a critical role for residues within klotho's putative
active site in mediating some of the activities of klotho. Thus, mutations of these
residues abolished its effect on TRPV5 and on the renal phosphate transporter NaPi-2a
(11, 32, 33) but did not affect its ability to inhibit Wnt signaling (34). Our studies indicate
that these amino acids are not required for klotho tumor suppressor activity. These data
strengthen a possible relationship between klotho tumor suppressor activity and Wnt
inhibition and suggest that enzymatic activity of klotho may not be required for its activity
against cancer cells. On the other hand, the klotho double mutant showed reduced
ability to mediate FGF23 signaling. This observation indicates that klotho's diverse
activities are mediated by different regions and may lead for the development of klotho-
based molecules showing differential activities. The design of such molecules may
enable the development of rational novel active and safe cancer therapies.
Taken together, our data indicate differential activity of KL1 and KL2 domains of
klotho in breast cancer cells and suggest that klotho tumor suppressor activities are not
mediated by enzymatic activity. Importantly, our studies indicate that it is possible to
15
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
dissociate klotho tumor suppressor activities from other activities of it. These
observations may pave the way for a rational design of klotho-based molecules for the
treatment of breast cancer.
Authors' Contributions
Conception and designing experiments: H. Ligumsky, K. Merenbakh-Lamin, T.
Rubinek and I. Wolf
Acquisition of data: H. Ligumsky and K. Merenbakh-Lamin.
Cloning of expression constructs: H. Ligumsky, K. Merenbakh-Lamin and S.
Shamoon.
Generation of computerized protein models: A. Yeheskel, R. Sertchook
Analysis and interpretation of data: H. Ligumsky, T. Rubinek and I. Wolf
Writing: H. Ligumsky, A. Yeheskel, T. Rubinek and I. Wolf. All authors commented on
the manuscript
Grant Support
This study was supported in part by the Israeli Science Foundation (grant number
1112/09), the Israel Cancer Association Research Grant by Peter & Nancy Brown in
memory of Eric & Melvin Brown, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv
University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
16
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
References 1. Kuro-o M, Matsumura Y, Aizawa H, Kawaguchi H, Suga T, Utsugi T, et al. Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing. Nature. 1997;390(6655):45-51. 2. Matsumura Y, Aizawa H, Shiraki-Iida T, Nagai R, Kuro-o M, Nabeshima Y. Identification of the human klotho gene and its two transcripts encoding membrane and secreted klotho protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;242(3):626-30. 3. Chen CD, Podvin S, Gillespie E, Leeman SE, Abraham CR. Insulin stimulates the cleavage and release of the extracellular domain of Klotho by ADAM10 and ADAM17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(50):19796-801. 4. Kurosu H, Yamamoto M, Clark JD, Pastor JV, Nandi A, Gurnani P, et al. Suppression of aging in mice by the hormone Klotho. Science. 2005;309(5742):1829-33. 5. Urakawa I, Yamazaki Y, Shimada T, Iijima K, Hasegawa H, Okawa K, et al. Klotho converts canonical FGF receptor into a specific receptor for FGF23. Nature. 2006;444(7120):770-4. 6. Imura A, Tsuji Y, Murata M, Maeda R, Kubota K, Iwano A, et al. alpha-Klotho as a regulator of calcium homeostasis. Science. 2007;316(5831):1615-8. 7. Razzaque MS. The FGF23-Klotho axis: endocrine regulation of phosphate homeostasis. Nature reviews Endocrinology. 2009;5(11):611-9. 8. Kurosu H, Ogawa Y, Miyoshi M, Yamamoto M, Nandi A, Rosenblatt KP, et al. Regulation of fibroblast growth factor-23 signaling by klotho. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(10):6120-3. 9. Wolf I, Levanon-Cohen S, Bose S, Ligumsky H, Sredni B, Kanety H, et al. Klotho: a tumor suppressor and a modulator of the IGF-1 and FGF pathways in human breast cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27(56):7094-105. 10. Abramovitz L, Rubinek T, Ligumsky H, Bose S, Barshack I, Avivi C, et al. KL1 internal repeat mediates klotho tumor suppressor activities and inhibits bFGF and IGF-I signaling in pancreatic cancer. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2011;17(13):4254-66. 11. Cha SK, Ortega B, Kurosu H, Rosenblatt KP, Kuro OM, Huang CL. Removal of sialic acid involving Klotho causes cell-surface retention of TRPV5 channel via binding to galectin-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(28):9805-10. 12. Chang Q, Hoefs S, van der Kemp AW, Topala CN, Bindels RJ, Hoenderop JG. The beta-glucuronidase klotho hydrolyzes and activates the TRPV5 channel. Science. 2005;310(5747):490-3. 13. Li XX, Huang LY, Peng JJ, Liang L, Shi DB, Zheng HT, et al. Klotho suppresses growth and invasion of colon cancer cells through inhibition of IGF1R-mediated PI3K/AKT pathway. International journal of oncology. 2014;45(2):611-8. 14. Xie B, Zhou J, Shu G, Liu DC, Zhou J, Chen J, et al. Restoration of klotho gene expression induces apoptosis and autophagy in gastric cancer cells: tumor suppressive role of klotho in gastric cancer. Cancer cell international. 2013;13(1):18. 15. Chen B, Wang X, Zhao W, Wu J. Klotho inhibits growth and promotes apoptosis in human lung cancer cell line A549. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR. 2010;29:99. 16. Camilli TC, Xu M, O'Connell MP, Chien B, Frank BP, Subaran S, et al. Loss of Klotho during melanoma progression leads to increased filamin cleavage, increased
17
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
Wnt5A expression, and enhanced melanoma cell motility. Pigment cell & melanoma research. 2011;24(1):175-86. 17. Rubinek T, Shulman M, Israeli S, Bose S, Avraham A, Zundelevich A, et al. Epigenetic silencing of the tumor suppressor klotho in human breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2012;133(2):649-57. 18. Imura A, Iwano A, Tohyama O, Tsuji Y, Nozaki K, Hashimoto N, et al. Secreted Klotho protein in sera and CSF: implication for post-translational cleavage in release of Klotho protein from cell membrane. FEBS Lett. 2004;565(1-3):143-7. 19. Shiraki-Iida T, Aizawa H, Matsumura Y, Sekine S, Iida A, Anazawa H, et al. Structure of the mouse klotho gene and its two transcripts encoding membrane and secreted protein. FEBS Lett. 1998;424(1-2):6-10. 20. Tohyama O, Imura A, Iwano A, Freund JN, Henrissat B, Fujimori T, et al. Klotho is a novel beta-glucuronidase capable of hydrolyzing steroid beta-glucuronides. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(11):9777-84. 21. Hayashi Y, Okino N, Kakuta Y, Shikanai T, Tani M, Narimatsu H, et al. Klotho- related protein is a novel cytosolic neutral beta-glycosylceramidase. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(42):30889-900. 22. Soding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(7):951-60. 23. Sali A, Potterton L, Yuan F, van Vlijmen H, Karplus M. Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELLER. Proteins. 1995;23(3):318-26. 24. Chaudhury S, Berrondo M, Weitzner BD, Muthu P, Bergman H, Gray JJ. Benchmarking and analysis of protein docking performance in Rosetta v3.2. PloS one. 2011;6(8):e22477. 25. Roche DB, Buenavista MT, McGuffin LJ. Assessing the quality of modelled 3D protein structures using the ModFOLD server. Methods in molecular biology. 2014;1137:83-103. 26. Ashkenazy H, Erez E, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic acids research. 2010;38(Web Server issue):W529-33. 27. UniProt C. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic acids research. 2014;42(11):7486. 28. Altschul SF, Wootton JC, Gertz EM, Agarwala R, Morgulis A, Schaffer AA, et al. Protein database searches using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices. The FEBS journal. 2005;272(20):5101-9. 29. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic acids research. 2002;30(14):3059-66. 30. Wolf I, O'Kelly J, Rubinek T, Tong M, Nguyen A, Lin BT, et al. 15- hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase is a tumor suppressor of human breast cancer. Cancer research. 2006;66(15):7818-23. 31. Mian IS. Sequence, structural, functional, and phylogenetic analyses of three glycosidase families. Blood cells, molecules & diseases. 1998;24(2):83-100. 32. Hu MC, Shi M, Zhang J, Pastor J, Nakatani T, Lanske B, et al. Klotho: a novel phosphaturic substance acting as an autocrine enzyme in the renal proximal tubule.
18
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2010;24(9):3438-50. 33. Wolf MT, An SW, Nie M, Bal MS, Huang CL. Klotho Up-regulates Renal Calcium Channel Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 5 (TRPV5) by Intra- and Extracellular N-glycosylation-dependent Mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(52):35849-57. 34. Liu H, Fergusson MM, Castilho RM, Liu J, Cao L, Chen J, et al. Augmented Wnt signaling in a mammalian model of accelerated aging. Science. 2007;317(5839):803-6. 35. Liu F, Wu S, Ren H, Gu J. Klotho suppresses RIG-I-mediated senescence- associated inflammation. Nature cell biology. 2011;13(3):254-62. 36. Doi S, Zou Y, Togao O, Pastor JV, John GB, Wang L, et al. Klotho inhibits transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) signaling and suppresses renal fibrosis and cancer metastasis in mice. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(10):8655-65. 37. Chen B, Ma X, Liu S, Zhao W, Wu J. Inhibition of lung cancer cells growth, motility and induction of apoptosis by Klotho, a novel secreted Wnt antagonist, in a dose- dependent manner. Cancer biology & therapy. 2012;13(12):1221-8. 38. Plotnikov A, Zehorai E, Procaccia S, Seger R. The MAPK cascades: signaling components, nuclear roles and mechanisms of nuclear translocation. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2011;1813(9):1619-33. 39. Andrukhova O, Zeitz U, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Lanske B, Erben RG. FGF23 acts directly on renal proximal tubules to induce phosphaturia through activation of the ERK1/2-SGK1 signaling pathway. Bone. 2012;51(3):621-8. 40. Santarpia L, Lippman SM, El-Naggar AK. Targeting the MAPK-RAS-RAF signaling pathway in cancer therapy. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2012;16(1):103-19. 41. Cha SK, Hu MC, Kurosu H, Kuro-o M, Moe O, Huang CL. Regulation of renal outer medullary potassium channel and renal K(+) excretion by Klotho. Molecular pharmacology. 2009;76(1):38-46. 42. Huff KK, Kaufman D, Gabbay KH, Spencer EM, Lippman ME, Dickson RB. Secretion of an insulin-like growth factor-I-related protein by human breast cancer cells. Cancer research. 1986;46(9):4613-9. 43. de Blaquiere GE, May FE, Westley BR. Increased expression of both insulin receptor substrates 1 and 2 confers increased sensitivity to IGF-1 stimulated cell migration. Endocrine-related cancer. 2009;16(2):635-47. 44. Bartucci M, Morelli C, Mauro L, Ando S, Surmacz E. Differential insulin-like growth factor I receptor signaling and function in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MCF-7 and ER-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Cancer research. 2001;61(18):6747- 54. 45. Stewart AJ, Johnson MD, May FE, Westley BR. Role of insulin-like growth factors and the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor in the estrogen-stimulated proliferation of human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(34):21172-8. 46. King TD, Suto MJ, Li Y. The Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway: a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2012;113(1):13-8.
19
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
Table 1: Comparison of blood chemistry parameters between the control and mice treated with soluble hKL1 (10 µg/kg) Parameter Control Soluble hKL1 p. value (N=6) (N=6) (Con. Vs. Soluble hKL1) Urea (mg/dL) 56.6 ± 5.03 57.33 ± 7.06 0.85 Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.24 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.02 0.46 Glucose (mg/dL) 205.2 ± 26.57 204.5 ± 24.92 0.96 Phosphorous (mg/dL) 7.8 ± 0.39 7.4 ± 0.89 0.48 Sodium (mg/dL) 142.6 ± 5.73 148 ± 2 0.057 Calcium mg/dL) 9.04 ± 0.67 9.42 ± 0.58 0.15 Chloride (mg/dL) 107.8 ± 3.83 110.67 ± 2.16 0.34 Potassium (mg/dL) 7.14 ± 1.07 6.53 ± 1.57 0.37 Uric acid (mg/dL) 1.92 ± 0.28 1.65 ± 0.43 0.25 SGOT (AST) IU/L 574.80 ± 323.23 232.67 ± 122.01 0.04* SGPT (ALT) IU/L 273.75 ± 199.85 75.83 ± 55.36 0.04* LDH IU/L 2534.33 ± 1348.54 698.75 ± 251.42 0.04* Alkaline Phosphatase 49.8 ± 14.34 81.17 ± 16.94 0.01* (IU/L) Protein (g/dL) 5.02 ± 0.5 5.53 ± 0.37 0.08 Albumin (g/dL) 2.66 ± 0.21 3.02 ± 0.29 0.05* Globulin (g/dL) 2.36 ± 0.32 2.5 ± 0.14 0.35
Table legend: Blood chemistry parameters from vehicle and soluble hKL1 treated nude mice harboring MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells tumors. Plasma was analyzed by automated blood lab (* p<0.05, soluble hKL1 treated mice vs control vehicle).
Figure legends
Figure 1: Structure–Function Relationships of klotho internal repeats. (A) Predicted
structure of klotho internal repeats with putative active site residues (in yellow),
responsible for the catalytic mechanism of a family 1 glycosidase. (B) Superimposition of
KLrP and KL1 active sites. KLrP active site side chains are presented in pink and KL1
domain in cyan. KLrP was crystallized with part of its product, glucose. (C)
Superimposition of KLrP and KL2 active sites. KLrP active site side chains are presented
in pink and KL2 domain in green. KLrP was crystallized with part of its product, glucose.
20
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
Figure 2: Klotho internal repeats exhibit differential effect on colony formation in
breast cancer cells. (A) Schematic illustration of klotho constructs used in the study (B)
MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with FL-KL and indicated truncated KL1
and KL2 HA-tagged constructs. Total cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with
anti HA antibody. (C) MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with either a full-
length klotho expression vector (FL-KL), KL1, KL2 or an empty vector (pcDNA3) (all
constructs depicted in (A)). Transfected cells were cultured in media containing G418 for
two weeks. Colonies were fixed and stained with crystal violet and photographed. All
experiments were conducted at least 3 times and representative wells for each condition
are shown. (D) Quantitation of the colonies was performed using ImageJ (* p<0.05, FL-
KL and KL1 vs control).
Figure 3: Soluble human KL1 (hKL1) inhibits growth of breast tumors in nude
mice. (A) MDA-MB-231 cells were injected into both flanks of six-week-old female
athymic nude mice. The mice (N=6 per group) were treated with daily intra-peritoneal
injections of soluble hKL1 (10 μg/kg) or vehicle control (saline), for 3 weeks. Tumors
volumes were measured weekly (**P<0.001, for tumor volume between soluble hKL1
treated and control group). (B) Representative photographs of mice with tumors in
soluble hKL1 treated group and control group before they were sacrificed. (C) Tumors
weight was measured on day of sacrifice (**P < 0.01 for comparison of tumor weight
between the control group and the mice treated with soluble hKL1). (D) H&E, Ki67,
vimentin and cytokeratin AE1/AE3 immunostaining (x400 magnification). (E). Mice
weight of soluble hKL1 treated group and control group at the beginning and the end of
the I.P injections.
21
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
Figure 4: Only KL1 domain suppresses IGF-1 signaling and interacts with the IGF-
1R in breast cancer cells. (A) MCF-7 cells were transfected as described above,
starved for 48 hours and then stimulated with IGF-1 for 15 min. Cell lysates were
immunoblotted using anti-phosphorylated (p) IGF-1R, p- and total (t)-AKT and p- and t-
ERK1/2 antibodies. Phosphorylated to-total ratio is calculated relative to untreated
pcDNA3. Band quantification was performed using ImageJ. (B) MCF-7 cells over-
expressing full length klotho (FL-KL) KL1 and KL2 or a control vector were lysed and 400
μg protein was immunoprecipitated for total IGF-1R with anti-IGF-1R antibody. After
addition of protein A/G, immunocomplexes were washed, resolved on SDS–
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody.
Preliminary unprocessed cell lysate (input) is also shown. (*IgG heavy chain). (C) MCF-7
and HEK-293 were transfected as described above, starved for 48 hours and then
stimulated with FGF23 (100 ng/ml). Cell lysates were immunoblotted using phospho (p)
and total (t) ERK1/2. (D) HEK-293 cells were transfected with either FL-KL, FL-KL
without IC/TM, pEF (vector control), KL1, KL1 with IC/TM or pcDNA3 (vector control).
Following 48 hours serum starvation, cells were stimulated with vehicle or 100ng/ml
FGF23 for 15 min and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cell lysates were prepared for
Western blot using antibodies against phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) and total
ERK1/2.
Figure 5: Mutating klotho putative enzymatic active site does not affect klotho
anti-cancerous activity while compromising FGF23 signaling. (A, B) MCF-7 and
MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected as described above. Transfected cells were
cultured in media containing G418 for two weeks. Colonies were fixed and stained with
crystal violet and photographed. All experiments were conducted at least 3 times and
representative wells for each condition are shown. Quantitation of the colonies was 22
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Klotho structure-function relationships in breast cancer
performed using ImageJ (* p<0.05, FL-KL, FL-KL-416, FL-KL-240-416, KL1, KL1-416
and KL1-240-416 vs matched control; # p<0.05, FL-KL-416, FL-KL-240-416 vs WT FL-
KL and KL1, KL1- 416 and KL1-240-416 vs WT KL1). (C) HEK 293 cells were
transfected with either FL-KL, FL-KL-416, FL-KL-240-416, KL1, KL1-416 and KL1-240-
416 or pcDNA3 (vector control). Following 48 hours serum starvation, cells were
stimulated with vehicle or 100ng/ml FGF23 for 15 min and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Cell lysates were prepared for Western blot using antibodies against phosphorylated
ERK1/2 (pERK1/2), and total ERK1/2.
23
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 1 A
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 1
B C KL1 KL2
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 2 A B
C D
* * * *
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 3 A B C
D E
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 4 A B
*
C D
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 5
A B FL-KL KL1
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 5
C
pcDNA3 FL-KL FL-KL-416 FL-KL-240-416 FGF23 100ng/ml - + - + - + - + pERK1/2
tERK1/2
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 25, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Tumor Suppressor Activity of Klotho in Breast Cancer is Revealed by Structure-function Analysis
Hagai Ligumsky, Tami Rubinek, Keren Merenbakh-Lamin, et al.
Mol Cancer Res Published OnlineFirst June 25, 2015.
Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141
Supplementary Access the most recent supplemental material at: Material http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2015/06/26/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141.DC1
Author Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been Manuscript edited.
E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.
Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Subscriptions Department at [email protected].
Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2015/06/25/1541-7786.MCR-15-0141. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.
Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research.