PSEG Power, LLC
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bulletin 52. the Stratigraphy, Fauna and Correlation of The
52 -. BULLETIN~ .. _GEOLOGIC SERIES The Str:;ttigraphy, Fauna _ and Correlation of the Vincentown Formation ' \ I , I by KATHERINE FIEI;DING GREACE~ "· ' . ' DEPARTMENT OF ; .. CONSERVATION- AND DEVELOPMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY' ' _,. CHARLES P. WrLBEJ!, Director and Chief of the Division of · · · - · ' Forests and Parks · 1 . ,MEipiDITH K JoHNSON,· Chief of the Division of Geology ' · and Topography _, Trenton,' N. J. 194i . ' NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 52 GEOLOGIC SERIES The Stratigraphy, Fauna and Correlation of the Vincentown Formation hy KATHERINE FIELDING GREAOEN DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY CHARLES P. WILBER, Director anrl Chief of the Division of Forests and Parks MEREDITH E . .TOW, SON, Chief of the Division of Geology and 'ropography Trenton, N. J. 1941 NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT State House Annex, Trenton, N.J. CoT •. H. JJ. ?IIOELLER, Presldant . ....................... :Millburn A1n'HLlll J. CoLLrxs, JR., ........................... :;\loorestmrJJ \Vn1.1.-Ut C. COPE ...................... _ ........... Glen l{idge HciRRY L. DERRY ............•.........•..•.......... )fontclair JLIRTIN J. HoGENCAl!P .............................. Glen Rock \V. STEW.ART HOI.LJ)[GSHEAD .....•..•.................. Riverton CHARLES A. MEYER ..•.•.•••••..••.•..••.............. :\ndover OWEN WrNSTO" ...•...............•........•........ Mendham 2 NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ----------------------------------- LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL March 15, 1941. Mr. Charles P. -
New Decapods from the Navidad Formation (Miocene) of Chile
JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 25(3): 427–449, 2005 NEW DECAPODS FROM THE NAVIDAD FORMATION (MIOCENE) OF CHILE Rodney M. Feldmann, Carrie E. Schweitzer, and Alfonso Encinas (RMF, correspondence) Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, U.S.A. ([email protected]); (CES) Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, Canton, Ohio 44720, U.S.A. ([email protected]); (AE) Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Geologı´a, Casilla 13518, Correo 21, Santiago, Chile ([email protected]) ABSTRACT A new Miocene decapod fauna is described from the Navidad Formation of coastal Chile. The fauna includes five callianassoid taxa, none of which is preserved sufficiently to identify to species level. New species include Calappilia? chilensis, Hepatus spinimarginatus, Proterocarcinus navidad, Pilumnus cucaoensis, and Pinnixa navidadensis. A possible rhizopine member of the Pilumnidae Samouelle, 1819, is described. Trichopeltarion levis Casadı´o et al., 2004, previously known from the late Oligocene of western Argentina, was also recovered from these rocks. Calappa circularis Beurlen, from the lower Miocene Pirabas Formation in Brazil, is herein referred to Calappilia. This report greatly increases the known number of fossil decapods from Chile and sets the stage for paleobiogeographic comparison of the decapod faunas of Chile and Argentina. The Neogene rock sequence in Chile is largely confined to M.S. thesis, added Callianassa sp. and a new species of crab about seven basins along the modern Pacific Ocean to the list. That material along with the newly collected (Ceccioni, 1980). These basins have been subject to extreme specimens will be discussed herein. vertical motion during the Neogene (Martı´nez-Pardo, 1990) so that rocks have been deposited at depths ranging from GEOLOGICAL SETTING shallow, inner shelf to bathyal. -
40Th NYSGA Annual Meeting 1968
NEW YORK STATE GEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION GUIDEBOOK TO FIELD EXCURSIONS 40TH ANNUAL MEETING 1968 AT QUEENS COLLEGE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YO_RK FLUSHING, NEW YORK GUIDEBOOK to Field Excursions at the 40th Annual Meeting of the New York State Geological Association May 1968 Robert M. Finks, Editor Host: Department of Geology Queens College of The City University of New York Copies of this guidebook may be purchased from the Permanent Secretary, New York State Geological Association. Address Prof. Philip Hewitt, Department of Geology, State University College at Brockport, N. Y. 2 The organizer of the field trips described in this volume, and of the meeting at which they were given, is Professor Walter S. Newman President, NYSGA, 1968 3 CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Eugene A. Alexandrov, Queens College G. D. Bennett, U. S. Geological Survey Robert M. Finks, Queens College Leo M. Hall, University of Massachusetts David H. Krinsley, Queens College David J. Leveson, Brooklyn College James P. Minard, U. S. Geological Survey Walter S. Newman, Queens College James P. Owens, U. S. Geological Survey F. J. Pearson, U. S. Geological Survey N. M. Perlmutter, U. S. Geological Survey Nicholas M. Ratcliffe, City College E. Lynn Savage, Brooklyn College Carl K. Seyfert, Buffalo State University College Leslie A. Sirkin, Adelphi University Norman F. Sohl, U. S. Geological Survey David L. Thurber, Queens College Franklyn B. Van Houten, Princeton University 4 PREFACE The papers brought together in this Guidebook merit comparative reading at leisure, for they often bring to bear upon problems of the local geology many independent lines of evidence. Some matters that come immediately to mind out of personal interest are: (1) The relation of the New York City Group to the unmetamorphosed Cambro Ordovician sequence (Trips A, C, E, H). -
Final Report Preliminary Characterization of Co2 Sequestration Potential in New Jersey and the Offshore Coastal Region
FINAL REPORT PRELIMINARY CHARACTERIZATION OF CO2 SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL IN NEW JERSEY AND THE OFFSHORE COASTAL REGION Conducted by the Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) DOE-NETL Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-05NT42589 Submitted by: New Jersey Geological Survey PO Box 427 Trenton, NJ 08625 Submitted by: Battelle 505 King Avenue Columbus, OH 43201 MRCSP Program Manager: David Ball Prepared for: The U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory 3610 Collins Ferry Road P.O. Box 880 Morgantown, WV 26507-0880 Program Manager: Traci Rodosta April 21, 2011 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor Battelle, nor any member of the MRCSP makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendations, or favoring by Battelle, members of the MRCSP, the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and the opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the members of the MRCSP, the United States Government -
UC Berkeley Paleobios
UC Berkeley PaleoBios Title Paleogene chelonians from Maryland and Virginia Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7253p3tf Journal PaleoBios, 31(1) ISSN 0031-0298 Author Weems, Robert E. Publication Date 2014-05-27 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PaleoBios 31(1):1–32, May 27, 2014 Paleogene chelonians from Maryland and Virginia ROBERT E. WEEMS Paleo Quest, 14243 Murphy Terrace, Gainesville, Virginia, 20155, USA; [email protected] Fossil remains of 22 kinds of Paleogene turtles have been recovered in Maryland and Virginia from the early Paleocene Brightseat Formation (four taxa), late Paleocene Aquia Formation (nine taxa), early Eocene Nanje- moy Formation (five taxa), middle Eocene Piney Point Formation (one taxon), and mid-Oligocene Old Church Formation (three taxa). Twelve taxa are clearly marine forms, of which ten are pancheloniids (Ashleychelys palmeri, Carolinochelys wilsoni, Catapleura coatesi, Catapleura sp., Euclastes roundsi, E. wielandi, ?Lophochelys sp., Procolpochelys charlestonensis, Puppigerus camperi, and Tasbacka ruhoffi), and two are dermochelyids (Eosphargis insularis and cf. Eosphargis gigas). Eight taxa represent fluvial or terrestrial forms (Adocus sp., Judithemys kranzi n. sp., Planetochelys savoiei, cf. “Trionyx” halophilus, “Trionyx” pennatus, “Kinosternoid B,” Bothremydinae gen. et sp. indet., and Bothremydidae gen. et sp. indet.), and two taxa (Aspideretoides virgin- ianus and Allaeochelys sp.) are trionychian turtles that probably frequented estuarine and nearshore marine environments. In Maryland and Virginia, turtle diversity superficially appears to decline throughout the Pa- leogene, but this probably is due to an upward bias in the local stratigraphic column toward more open marine environments that have preserved very few remains of riverine or terrestrial turtles. -
B20 Stratigraphy of the Post-Potomac Cretaceous-Tertiary Rocks Of
State of Delaware DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert R. Jordan, State Geologist BULLETIN NO. 20 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE POST-POTOMAC CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY ROCKS OF CENTRAL DELAWARE By Richard N. Benson and Nenad Spoljaric Pennsylvania 40° Oayton Core Hole New Jersey .Kb32-01 Delaware 39° Bay Ol125-02• Delaware Maryland 76° University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 1996 State of Delaware DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert R. Jordan, State Geologist BULLETIN NO. 20 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE POST-POTOMAC CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY ROCKS OF CENTRAL DELAWARE BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY OF TEST WELL Je32-04 By Richard N. Benson NON-CLAY MINERALOGY OF THE MATRIX (SILT-CLAY) OF Je32-04 CORES By Nenad Spoljaric SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION OF SELECTED BOREHOLE GEOPHYSICAL LOGS FROM CENTRAL DELAWARE AND NEW JERSEY By Richard N. Benson University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 1996 CONTENTS Page Page ABSTRACT ............................................... 1 Aragonite . 13 Dolomite . 13 INTRODUCTION . 3 Pyrite and Marcasite . 13 Acknowledgments . .. .. 3 Siderite . 13 BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND Zeolites . 13 CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY OF TEST WELL Je32-04 Hematite . 13 By Richard N. Benson . 5 Goethite ................................................. 13 INTRODUCTION . 5 Vivianite . 13 CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY AND BIOSTRATIGRAPHY 5 Quartz ................................................... 13 Upper Cretaceous . 5 Feldspar . 13 Upper Cenomanian-Lower Turonian . 5 Calcite .................................................. 13 Santonian . 5 UNUSUAL MINERALS Campanian . 5 AND -
Geology of the Betterton Quadrangle, Kent County, Maryland, and a Di~Cussion of the Regional Stratigraphy
Geology of the Betterton Quadrangle, Kent County, Maryland, and a Di~cussion of the Regional Stratigraphy GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 816 Geology of the Betterton Quadrangle, Kent County, Maryland, and a Discussion of the Regional Stratigraphy By JAMES P. MINARD GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 816 A description of Coastal Plain formations and a regional correlation with equivalent units to the northeast in Delaware and New Jersey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1974 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-600006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price $1.20 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02558 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract 1 Stratigraphy of the Betterton quadrangle-Continued Quaternary deposits-Continued Introduction ------------------------------------ 1 Location and extent of area ------------------ 1 Holocene deposits ------------------------ 13 Purpose and history of investigation __________ _ 1 Bog -------------------------------- 13 13 Acknowledgxnents --------------------------- 4 Beach sand ------------------------ Previous investigations ----------------------- 4 Marsh deposits --------------------- 14 14 4 Alluvium --------------------------- Physiography ----------------------------------- Structure 14 Stratigraphy of the Betterton quadrangle -------- 5 Economic aspects ------------------------------- 14 Lower -
New Jersey Rocks
J'o- ~c, $' '"' <'~ 0'<; ~0 -4-'1> 1'"1 ;,"-? 1';- <Y Y> ~~"' RUTGERS ~-'t> -fc~- ~ -Pv Q'Y P..y, ~~ ~"o «'.p UNIVERSITY .,-'t>'>; ~~ ~~ .s -( A.,.4.. <"/J' .,, v. ~~ LIBRARY <~',> '<,~ ~t., ~ ~1' -'t>~ -1~ ~ .s/,~: ,., /) ~~ )- J'o- ~c, ({9 $' '"'" ~0 0'<; -P..., -4-'1> ;;-., 1';- <Y ~~"' Y> ~ -fc~- ~-'t> .Pv IJ~ 9:-~ ~>-.y, Q..., ~"o -'t>'>; (<'1' Presented by ~~ ~~ ., .s A.,.4.. -( v. c,' <"/J' ~~ '<,~ d-_,> ~ ~t- The State of New Jersey -'t>~ ~.p ~ -1~ ~ 1.1/,~: ~~ /) )- <'{9 ~c, J'o- $' '"'" 1'"1 0'<; ~0;;-., -4-'1> 1';- ''cl- 't'"' ~~"' (J- Y> ~-'t> :-,; -fc~- ~ .Pv ~-'t> -fc~- ~>-.y, 9:-~ ~"o Qy ~>-.y, (<'1' -'t>'>; ~~ ~ .s c, ~~ -( A.,.4.. "" v -( A.."' <"/J' c,' ~~ <"/J' .,, <~',> '<,~ ~t., ~ d-,> '<,~ ~1' -'t>~ ~ -1~ ~ \$'/,~: ,., -1~ /) ~~ )- '"'y /) '>~ J'IY. ~c, J'o- ~c, <'{9 $' 0'<; ~0;;-., 0'<; -P..., -4-'1> ~0;;-., (J- 1';- (J- ~~"' Y> ~~"' ~ -fc~- ~-'t> -Pv ~ -fc~- 9:-~ ~>-.y, Qy ~"o 9:-~ ~>-.y, ~~ ~~ -'t>'>; «'.p ~~ ~~ c, .s -( A.,.4.. -( v. A.,.4... c,' <"/J' ~~ c,' <"/J' '<,~ d-,> ~ ~t- '<,~ d-,> ~ -1~ -'t>~ ~1' ~ ...,~ /) ,<=> .s/,~: /) '>~ '"'y )- '>~ J'o- ~., ~c, ~ <'{9 0'<; ~0 -'t>~ 0'<; ;,"/) -'t>-4 1'..., (J- .P;- ~"' ~~"' )" ~ ~ .Pv ~-'t> -fc~- ~ .Pv ~ ~"o Qy J,..IY. 9:-~ ~"o «'.p -'t>'» (<'1' \S' c, ~~ ~~ .s -( v. ~~ A.,.4.. v. ~~ ~t., <"/J' ~ ~t., ~ <~',> '<,~ ~'t' ~1' -'t>~ ~1' c,"'t> .s/,~: ~ -1~ ~ .s/)': y )- 'r-" /) '>~ ·;- <'{9 ~ J'IY. ~c, ({9 -s- '"' -P..., -'t>~ ~0 0'<; 1'..., -'t>~ 1';- -'t>-4 <"/) .§ .P;- -'t>-4 )" (J- ~ '"' ~-'t> .Pv ~ -fc~- ~ .Pv Qy ~"o 9:-~ J,..IY. Q'Y ~"o -'t>'» (<'1' :i>'>; «'.j) c, .s ~~ ~~ ., \S' A.,.4.. -( ~~ v <"/J' ~~ v. -
Geologic Map of New Jersey: Central Sheet
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map of New Jersey: Central Sheet by James P. Owens, Peter J. Sugarman, Norman F. Sohl, Ronald A. Parker, Hugh F. Houghton, Richard A, Volkert, Avery A, Drake, Jr., and Randall C. Omdorfr Open-File Report 95-253 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government 1995 Geologic Map of New Jersey: Central Sheet by James P. Owens, Peter J. Sugarman, Norman F. Sohl, Ronald, A. Parker, Hugh F. Houghton, Richard A. Volkert Avery A. Drake, Jr. and Randall C. Orndorff INTRODUCTION The central bedrock sheet (scale 1:100,000) covers an area of approximately 2,300 square mi in central New Jersey. Parts of two large sedimentary basins crop out within the borders of this geologic map. The early Mesozoic Newark basin is exposed in the norm, and a Cretaceous to Miocene basin is present in the south. A thin salient of Proterozoic and lower Paleozoic rocks separates the two basins in the vicinity of Trenton. Thus, rocks exposed in the central bedrock sheet range in age from Middle Proterozoic to Miocene. Younger sediments are widespread within the map area, but these are shown on a separate surficial geologic map. Maps showing the generalized regional distribution of early Mesozoic basins and Coastal Plain basins and arches are illustrated in figure 1. -
PSEG RAI 61 Response
PSEG Site ESP Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report 2.5 GEOLOGY, SEISMOLOGY, AND GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION This section provides information on the geology, seismology, and geotechnical characteristics of the PSEG Site. The section follows the standard format and content prescribed in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.206, Combined License Applications for Nuclear Power Plants (LWR Edition), Revision 0, 2007. Further, the technical content complies with RG 1.208, A Performance-Based Approach to Define the Site-Specific Earthquake Ground Motion, Revision 0, 2007, for guidance respective to the level of investigation recommended at different distances from a proposed site for a nuclear facility. A particular focus is on data developed since the publication of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) for licensing Salem Generating Station (SGS) and the Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS) in the same site area. The PSEG Site is located on the southern part of Artificial Island on the east bank of the Delaware River in Lower Alloways Creek Township, Salem County, New Jersey. The SGS and HCGS are adjacent to the planned new plant location. The site is relatively level with existing surface grades ranging nominally from elevation 5 to 15 feet (ft.), North American Vertical Datum 88 (NAVD). Investigations to obtain the data discussed in Section 2.5 were performed by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. (with William Lettis Associates, Inc.) working under the overall direction of Sargent and Lundy, LLC. Field investigation work includes geologic mapping, geotechnical borings, surveying and geophysical testing as briefly described below. Laboratory testing of selected samples was performed. -
Northeastern/North-Central Northeastern/North-Central
Volume 49, Number 2 Number 49, Volume Joint Meeting NORTHEASTERN/NORTH-CENTRAL Sections Meeting 19–21 March 2017 Omni William Penn Hotel Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Joint Meeting Northeastern & North-Central Sections 52nd Meeting for the Northeastern 51st Meeting for the North-Central 19–21 March 2017 Omni William Penn Hotel Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania http://www.geosociety.org/ne-mtg Shale Gas Production Views from the Energy Rollercoaster Meeting Committee Co-Chairs ....................................Patrick Burkhart (NE), Timothy Fisher (NC) Vice Chair .........................................................James Harrell(NC) Technical Program .............................Wendell Barner (NE), Richard Becker (NC) Treasurer ............................................................Patrick Burkhart Field Trips ........................................Kyle Fredrick (NE), Joe Hannibal (NC) Sponsorship .....................................Patrick Burkhart (NE), Mark Camp (NC) K–12 Weekend ........................Karen Rose Cercone (NE), Polly Root Sturgeon (NC) Exhibits ............................................................Sarah McGuiness Work Shops ...........................................................Timothy Fisher Special Events ..........................................................Maraina Miles Student Volunteers ................................Daniel Harris (NE), Don Stierman (NC) Mentoring ...................................Jonathan Warnock (NE), Don Stierman (NC) Posters .................................................... -
Sandy Hook Sites1 1 Introduction 1 Site Summary 4 Background and Objectives Kenneth G
Miller, K.G., Sugarman, P.J., Browning, J.V., et al. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports Volume 174AX (Suppl.) publications.iodp.org https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.174AXS.112.2018 Contents Sandy Hook sites1 1 Introduction 1 Site summary 4 Background and objectives Kenneth G. Miller, Peter J. Sugarman, Scott D. Stanford, James V. Browning, 6 Operations Kimberly Baldwin, Brian Buttari, Benjamin Dunham, Michael Farazaneh, 10 Lithostratigraphy and sequence Rachel Filo, Michael P. Gagliano, Benjamin Horton, Gabrielle Gallegos, stratigraphy Stephen Graham, Christopher S. Johnson, Nicole Khan, Denise K. Kulhanek, 22 Biostratigraphy Christopher J. Lombardi, Nicole Malerba, Kendra McKoy, Peter P. McLaughlin, Jr., 24 Isotopic stratigraphy Donald H. Monteverde, J.N. Stanley, and Stella Woodard2 25 Conclusions 27 References Keywords: Ocean Drilling Program, ODP, Leg 174AX, Leg 174AXS, Sandy Hook, New Jersey 30 Figures Coastal Plain Drilling Project, NJCPDP, Last Glacial Maximum, LGM, Cheesequake Formation, 47 Tables Englishtown Formation, Merchantville Formation, Magothy Formation, Passaic Formation, 48 Appendix figures Potomac Formation, Raritan Formation, Vincentown Formation, Woodbury Formation, Amboy Stoneware Clay, South Amboy Fire Clay, Woodbridge Clay, Sayreville Sand, Old Bridge Sand, Cliffwood Beds, Morgan Beds Introduction Recovery was moderate to good, considering the sandy nature of the sediments being drilled. The NMY site drilled 285.0 ft (86.9 m) The following authors, listed in alphabetic order, are responsible and recovered 184.0 ft (56.1 m; 65% recovered). The SS site drilled for the given sections: 255.0 ft (77.7 m) and recovered 174.5 ft (53.2 m; 68% recovered). At the SMY site, Hole SMY-A drilled 175.0 ft (53.3 m) and recovered Chief Scientists: Miller, Stanford (Quaternary objectives), 89.5 ft (27.3 m; 51% recovered).