The Baltimore Canyon Trough

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Baltimore Canyon Trough THE NEW JERSEY COASTAL PLAIN AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BALTIMORE CANYON TROUGH RICHARD K. OLSSON Department of Geological Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey Introduction The coastal plain of New Jersey lies along the western the trough and does not extend beneath New Jersey, edge of the Baltimore Canyon Trough, a large sedimen­ tary basin which extends along the United States Middle Overlying the limestone sequence (Figs. 2,3) are upper Atlantic states (Fig. 1), Tne Baltimore Canyon Trough 1 urassic and lower Cretaceous nonmarine and shallow extends seaward beneath the continental shelf to the up­ marine sandstones and shales (Poag, 1979). These per continental slope. A westward extension of tHe sediments thin beneath New Jersey and lie upon trough forms the Salisbury Embayment of New Jersey, crystalline basement rock. Where penetrated in wells Delaware~ Maryland and eastern Virginia. The Raritan they appear to be nonmarine in character although they Embayment of northern New Jersey and Long Island is a shallow embayment. The South Jersey High separates these two embayments of the trough. The Baltimore Canyon Trough is composed of a seaward-thickening wedge of Mesozoic and Cenozoic sedimentary rocks which overlie a warped and faulted crystalline base­ ment. The sediments that lie within the New Jersey Coastal Plain were deposited west of the main hinge line of deposition. Seaward of the hinge line the sedimentary rocks of the Baltimore Canyon Trough thicken to at least 14 km (Poag, 1979). In contrast the maximum thickness of sediments in the New Jersey Coastal Plain is less than 2 km in tHe Salisbury Embayment. The sediments in the Baltimore Canyon Trough were initially deposited when North America and Africa separated during early Mesozoic time. The sediments (Figs. 2,3) that accumulated in the Baltimore Canyon Trough consist of limestones, sandstones, sands, shales, and clays (Poag, 1979). Diapir structures noted in geophysical profiles (Grow, 1980; Schlee and Grow, 1980) along the continental slope suggest evaporite ATLANTIC OCEAN deposition occurred in the early phases of continental separation. A deeply buried thick sequence of limestone of Jurassic and Early Cretaceous age is identified in NC multi-channel seismic reflection profiles of the trough o 30 60 and a carbonate bank or reef thought to represent the ! ! ! lower Cretaceous shelf edge is postulated to lie beneath miles the present day upper continental slope. Limestones of late Jurassic and early Cretaceous age were penetrated Fig. 1 Outline map of the Baltimore Canyon Trough and its rela­ in the basal portion of the COST B~3 weB which was tionship to the New Jersey Coastal Plain. Location of drilled on the continental slope off New Jersey. The COST B-2 and B-3 wells is shown. The hatchered mark limestone sequence is confined to the deeper portions of shows location of natural gas discoveries. PERIODS COASTAL PLAIN COASTAL PLAIN MA COST COST STAGES OUTCROP SUBSURFACE B-2 WELL B-3 WELL 10 MIOCENE 20 30 OL IGOCENE 40 SOCEOCENE ______ _ 60 PALEOCENE MAASTRICHTIAN ~~~~~~ 70 CAMPANIAN 80 SANTONIAN CONIACIAN 90 TURONIAN CENOMANIAN ALBIAN APTIAN BARREMANIAN OXFORDIAN r{{{:l CONTINENTAL a ....... ~SHELF COASTAL MARINE 1....:------1 SLOPE Fig. 2 Diagram showing distribution of the continental, coastal marine, shelf, and slope facies in time. Data on COST B-3 well is taken from Poag, 1980, FIELD STUDIES OF NEW JERSEY GEOLOGY AND GUIDE TO FIELD TRIPS 118 TERTIARY CRETACEOUS JURASSIC TRIASSIC REDBEDS S VOLCANICS CONTINENTAL CRUST 100 km R. K. OLSSON. 1980 Fig. 3 Cross-section through Coastal Plain and Baltimore Canyon Trough modified after Schlee and Grow, 1980. have not been thoroughly studied. The upper tion of faulted basins in which continental sediments ac­ Cretaceous and Tertiary marine sequence that forms the cumulated. As continental separation began and the in­ major part of the New Jersey coastal plain belongs to a itial opening of the Atlantic occurred evaporite en­ marine cycle that began during Aptian time and trans­ vironments formed during the Late Triassic and Early gressed over the Atlantic margin, bringing sea level over Jurassic. Some of the rifted basins continued to receive the New Jersey area for the first time since the Atlantic continental sediments during Early Jurassic time. This began to open. early stage of development was accompanied by exten­ sive volcanism consisting of intrusive and extrusive The sediments that were deposited in the coastal plain placement of basaltic and dioritic rocks, of New Jersey consist of fluvial sands, gravels, and varigated clays; coastal deposits of beach~ lagoon, As circulation within the developing Atlantic Ocean marsh~ and related deposits; inner shelf sediments con­ became less restricted during Jurassic time carbonate sisting of shoreface sands with characteristic environments developed with bank and reef growth. Ophiomorpha trace fossil assemblages and offshore Fluvial sediments were deposited over the Triassic rifted micaceous clay and silty thinly bedded fine sands; mid basins landward of the carbonates. During Jurassic to and outer shelf clay glauconite sands and glauconitic Early Cretaceous time as the Atlantic continued to clays, often extensively burrowed; and slope deposits widen the carbonate bank and reef complex prograded composed of calcareous clays and silts. The formations seaward over the oceanic basement (Fig.3). In the of these various facies were deposited during major coastal plain area extensions of the Baltimore Canyon cycles of sea level change and are genetically related to Trough developed as embayments. These embayments, sedimentary units that have been penetrated in the the Salisbury and Rflritan embayments, which are prob­ COST B-2 and B-3 wells in the Baltimore Canyon ably fault bounded, received thicker sequences of Trough. The relationship of the New Jersey formations Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous fluvial sediments. In to the units penetrated in these wells will be discussed in Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous time shallow marine the section on lithologic units. incursions began to extend landward of the carbonate complex (Fig. 3). Geological History of Coastal Plain and Baltimore Canyon Trougb A major cycle of sea level rise began during Albian time and in the Cenomanian seas spread into the coastal A general sequence of events based upon subsurface plain area for the first time (Fig. 3). This cycle of sea studies (Figs. 2,3) in the New Jersey coastal plain, data level rise ended the deposition of carbonate sediments from the COST B-2 and B-3 wells, .seismic reflection along the Lower Cretaceous shelf edge. The carbonates profiles, and seismic refraction studies can be con­ now lie beneath the present upper continental slope. The structed for the Baltimore Canyon Trough and the adja­ rise of sea level which began during Albian time lasted cent New Jersey coastal plain (Grow, 1980; Poag, 1979, until the Turonian before being interrupted by a 1980; Schlee and Grow, 1~80; Sheridan, 1979). moderate faU in sea level. Nevertheless~ renewed rise in sea level continued during the latter part of Late The separation of North America and Africa began Cretaceous time. The Late Cretaceous stratigraphy of during the Triassic yvith extensive drifting and forma- the coastal plain was controlled by individua.l cycles 119 COASTAL PLAIN AND THE BALTIMORE CANYON TROUGH within this major .rise of sea level. The deposition of environmental analysis. As such the Vail curve should marine sandt silt, and clay sifted with each sea level cy­ be regarded as a first approximation in achieving a cle. universal curve of sea level change in the geologic record. Changes in sea level continued to influence deposition . during the Paleocene and Eocene. During tne Late Figures 4,5, and 6 show the record of sea level change in Cretaceous and Paleocene sediments accumulated in the coastal plain and the Baltimore Canyon Trough. shelf environments of aeposition in the coastal plain The magnitude of sea level rise and fall is estimated on and for the most part in the Baltimore Canyon Trough paleontologic criteria, chiefly foraminifera. It can be except in its most distal part. During the Early Eocene, observed that in many places there is general agreement however t bathyal environments of deposition extended with the timing of sea level cycles shown on the Vail into the coastal plain (Fig. 3). The Eocene shelf and curve but not necessarily with the magnitude or slope profile appears to have been very gradual with no character of each cycle. Of note (Fig. 6) is the record of distinct shelf edge. Shelf deposition was reestablished in the upper Eocene and Oligocene which differs the coastal plain during the middle Eocene time and significantly from that of Vail and others in that the rna· bathyal conditions retreated further out, in the jor lowering of sea level occurs in the lower Oligocene Baltimore Canyon Trough. Late Eocene shelf deposi­ where they show a major rise in sea level. tion occurred over most of the Baltimore Canyon Trough and may have extended into the coastal plain, Lithologic Units although upper Eocene sediments are missing there. Jurassic At the end of Eocene time a major lowering of sea level occurred and the entire Baltimore Canyon Trough Nonmarine coarse sandstone and red and green shale was subjected to erosion. Sea level rose during Late of probable Jurassic age lie upon crystalline basement Oligocene time and the sea transgressed across an erod­ beneath New Jersey. Similar rocks intercalated with ed and beveled surface into the coastal plain area. marine shale were penetrated in the COST B-2 well where a thick Jurassic section is present. Carbonate During. Miocene time clastics prograded over the sediments are present further to the east in the COST Baltimore Canyon Trough and constructed the present B-3 well and in lower intervals in the Baltimore Canyon shelf and edge profile (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • RI37 Stratigraphic Nomenclature Of
    ,--' ( UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO.37 STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE OF NONMARINE CRETACEOUS ROCKS OF INNER MARGIN OF COASTAL PLAIN IN DELAWARE AND ADJACENT STATES BY ROBERT R. JORDAN STATE OF DELAWARE.. NEWARK, DELAWARE JUNE 1983 STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE OF NONMARINE CRETACEOUS ROCKS OF INNER MARGIN OF COASTAL PLAIN IN DELAWARE AND ADJACENT STATES By Robert R. Jordan Delaware Geological Survey June 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT. ....... 1 INTRODUCTION ..... 2 Purpose and Scope. 2 Acknowledgments.. 4 REGIONAL SETTING. 4 Regional Relationships . 4 Structural Features. 5 DESCRIPTIONS OF UNITS .. 8 Historical Summary 8 Potomac Formation. 13 Nomenclature. 13 Extent. 13 Lithology . 14 Patuxent Formation . 18 Nomenclature. 18 Extent.. 18 Lithology .... 18 Arundel Formation. 19 Nomenclature.. 19 Extent. .• 19 Lithology • 20 Page Patapsco Formation. .. 20 Nomenclature . 20 Extent .. 20 Lithology.. 20 Raritan Formation . 21 Nomenclature .. 21 Extent .. 22 Lithology.. 23 Magothy Formation .. 24 Nomenclature . 24 Extent .. 24 Lithology.. 25 ENVIRONMENTS OF DEPOSITION 28 AGES .... 29 SUBDIVISIONS AND CORRELATIONS .. 32 REFERENCES . 34 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Geologic map of nonmarine Cretaceous deposits .. ..•.• •.. 3 2. Structural features of the Coastal Plain. ............ 6 3. Schematic diagram of lateral and vertical relationships of nonmarine Cretaceous deposits•....•... 34 TABLES Page Table 1. Usage of group and formation names. 9 STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE OF NONMARINE CRETACEOUS ROCKS OF INNER MARGIN OF COASTAL PLAIN IN DELAWARE AND ADJACENT STATES ABSTRACT Rocks of Cretaceous age deposited in continental and marginal environments, and now found along the inner edge of the northern Atlantic Coastal Plain, have historically been classified as the Potomac Group and the Potomac, Patuxent, Arundel, Patapsco, Raritan, and Magothy forma­ tions.
    [Show full text]
  • AASG Geothermal Data Metadata Template
    Geothermal References Allen, E.P., Wilson, W.F., 1968, Geology and Mineral Resources of Orange County, North Carolina, North Carolina Geologic Survey, Bulletin 81, pp58 Allingham, J.W., 1970, Principal Facts for Gravity Stations in Howard County, MD, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 70-4, 19 pp. Amsden, T.W., Overbeck, R.M., and Martin, R.O.R., 1954, The Water Resources of Garrett County: Maryland Geological Survey, Bulletin 13, 3 plates, 349 p. Anderson, Campbell, 1976, Soil Characteristics of the Litholigic Units of Wake County, North Carolina, Open-File Report 73-1, North Carolina Geological Survey Anderson, D.N., and J.W. Lund (eds.), 1979, Direct Utilization of Geothermal Energy: A Layman's Guide, Geothermal Resources Council, Special Report No. 8, Davis, California, under U.S. DOE Contract ET-78-G-06- Anderson, J., 1948, Cretaceous and Tertiary Subsurface Geology: The Stratigraphy, Paleontology, and Sedimentology of Three Deep Test Wells on the Eastern Shore of Maryland: Maryland Geological Survey, Bulletin Andres, A.S., 2004, The Cat Hill Formation and Bethany Formation of Delaware: Delaware Geological Survey, Report of Investigation 67, 12 p. Andres, A.S., and C.S. Howard, 2000, RI62 The Cypress Swamp Formation, Delaware: Delaware Geological Survey, Report of Investigation 62, 18 p. Andres, A.S., Martin, M.J., 2005, Estimation of the Water Table for the Inland Bays Watershed, Delaware, Delaware Geological Survey Report of Investigations 68, 21 pp Andres, A.S., R.N. Benson, K.W. Ramsey, and J.H. Talley, 1990, Geologic and Hydrologic Studies of the Oligocene- Pleistocene Section Near Lewes, Delaware: Delaware Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 48, 39p.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Cretaceous Sequences and Sea-Level History, New Jersey Coastal Plain
    Upper Cretaceous sequences and sea-level history, New Jersey Coastal Plain Kenneth G. Miller² Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA Peter J. Sugarman New Jersey Geological Survey, P.O. Box 427, Trenton, New Jersey 08625, USA James V. Browning Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA Michelle A. Kominz Department of Geosciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008-5150, USA Richard K. Olsson Mark D. Feigenson John C. HernaÂndez Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA ABSTRACT pean sections, and Russian platform BACKGROUND outcrops points to a global cause. Because We developed a Late Cretaceous sea- backstripping, seismicity, seismic strati- Predictable, recurring sequences bracketed level estimate from Upper Cretaceous se- graphic data, and sediment-distribution by unconformities comprise the building quences at Bass River and Ancora, New patterns all indicate minimal tectonic ef- blocks of the stratigraphic record. Exxon Pro- Jersey (ODP [Ocean Drilling Program] Leg fects on the New Jersey Coastal Plain, we duction Research Company (EPR) de®ned a 174AX). We dated 11±14 sequences by in- interpret that we have isolated a eustatic depositional sequence as a ``stratigraphic unit tegrating Sr isotope and biostratigraphy signature. The only known mechanism composed of a relatively conformable succes- (age resolution 60.5 m.y.) and then esti- that can explain such global changesÐ sion of genetically related strata and bounded mated paleoenvironmental changes within glacio-eustasyÐis consistent with forami- at its top and base by unconformities or their the sequences from lithofacies and biofacies niferal d18O data.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT of CONSERVATION and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION of MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C
    VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 20 GEOLOGY OF THE OAK GROVE CORE . e- 1lg**** - rlrl""*"-*-lq j4;i; s" r "e .-e l;"* l* - :-* l,i.l-1" -*"4{ ' *-q-S''q-"_ l -a,T-,! - !:: ts"--l ::9: : ::5 :e 'l I ." t::::,:1,a::-:d:; r--" 4 f-d;:s ,:,S r,! ,:a:16:":, 9:-4:-:r:: -':"-lii;3? -F - d,* COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 1980 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 20 GEOLOGY OF THE OAK GROVE CORE COMMONWEALTH OF VI RGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHAR LOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1980 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 20 GEOLOGY OF THE OAK GROVE CORE COMMONWEALTH OF VI RGIN IA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 1980 COMMONWEALTH OT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF PURCHASES AND SUPPLY . RICHMOND 1980 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia FRED W. WALKER, Director JERALDF. MOORE, Deputy Director BOARD J. H. JOHNSON, West Point, Chairman A. R. DUNNING, Millwood, Vice Chairman MYRON P. ERKILETIAN, Alexandria ARTHUR P. FLIPPO. Doswell HENRY T. N. GRAVES, Luray MILDRED LAYNE, Williamsburg FREDERIC S. REED, Manakin-Sabot GEORGE P. SHAFRAN, Arlington SHELDON H. SHORT,III, Chase City NICHOLAS D. STREET, Grundy SHERMAN WALLACE, Cleveland E. FLOYD YATES, Powhatan CONTENTS' Page Part 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Highly Diversified Late Cretaceous Fish Assemblage Revealed by Otoliths (Ripley Formation and Owl Creek Formation, Northeast Mississippi, Usa)
    Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia (Research in Paleontology and Stratigraphy) vol. 126(1): 111-155. March 2020 HIGHLY DIVERSIFIED LATE CRETACEOUS FISH ASSEMBLAGE REVEALED BY OTOLITHS (RIPLEY FORMATION AND OWL CREEK FORMATION, NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI, USA) GARY L. STRINGER1, WERNER SCHWARZHANS*2 , GEORGE PHILLIPS3 & ROGER LAMBERT4 1Museum of Natural History, University of Louisiana at Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana 71209, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Mississippi Museum of Natural Science, 2148 Riverside Drive, Jackson, Mississippi 39202, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4North Mississippi Gem and Mineral Society, 1817 CR 700, Corinth, Mississippi, 38834, USA. E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author To cite this article: Stringer G.L., Schwarzhans W., Phillips G. & Lambert R. (2020) - Highly diversified Late Cretaceous fish assemblage revealed by otoliths (Ripley Formation and Owl Creek Formation, Northeast Mississippi, USA). Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat., 126(1): 111-155. Keywords: Beryciformes; Holocentriformes; Aulopiformes; otolith; evolutionary implications; paleoecology. Abstract. Bulk sampling and extensive, systematic surface collecting of the Coon Creek Member of the Ripley Formation (early Maastrichtian) at the Blue Springs locality and primarily bulk sampling of the Owl Creek Formation (late Maastrichtian) at the Owl Creek type locality, both in northeast Mississippi, USA, have produced the largest and most highly diversified actinopterygian otolith (ear stone) assemblage described from the Mesozoic of North America. The 3,802 otoliths represent 30 taxa of bony fishes representing at least 22 families. In addition, there were two different morphological types of lapilli, which were not identifiable to species level.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 52. the Stratigraphy, Fauna and Correlation of The
    52 -. BULLETIN~ .. _GEOLOGIC SERIES The Str:;ttigraphy, Fauna _ and Correlation of the Vincentown Formation ' \ I , I by KATHERINE FIEI;DING GREACE~ "· ' . ' DEPARTMENT OF ; .. CONSERVATION- AND DEVELOPMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY' ' _,. CHARLES P. WrLBEJ!, Director and Chief of the Division of · · · - · ' Forests and Parks · 1 . ,MEipiDITH K JoHNSON,· Chief of the Division of Geology ' · and Topography _, Trenton,' N. J. 194i . ' NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 52 GEOLOGIC SERIES The Stratigraphy, Fauna and Correlation of the Vincentown Formation hy KATHERINE FIELDING GREAOEN DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY CHARLES P. WILBER, Director anrl Chief of the Division of Forests and Parks MEREDITH E . .TOW, SON, Chief of the Division of Geology and 'ropography Trenton, N. J. 1941 NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT State House Annex, Trenton, N.J. CoT •. H. JJ. ?IIOELLER, Presldant . ....................... :Millburn A1n'HLlll J. CoLLrxs, JR., ........................... :;\loorestmrJJ \Vn1.1.-Ut C. COPE ...................... _ ........... Glen l{idge HciRRY L. DERRY ............•.........•..•.......... )fontclair JLIRTIN J. HoGENCAl!P .............................. Glen Rock \V. STEW.ART HOI.LJ)[GSHEAD .....•..•.................. Riverton CHARLES A. MEYER ..•.•.•••••..••.•..••.............. :\ndover OWEN WrNSTO" ...•...............•........•........ Mendham 2 NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ----------------------------------- LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL March 15, 1941. Mr. Charles P.
    [Show full text]
  • Survivorship Patterns of Miocene-Pliocene Marine Invertebrate Fauna of the Virginia Coastal Plain
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2008 Examination of the abundance and geographic range of rare taxa: survivorship patterns of Miocene-Pliocene marine invertebrate fauna of the Virginia Coastal Plain Austin L. Pryor College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Pryor, Austin L., "Examination of the abundance and geographic range of rare taxa: survivorship patterns of Miocene-Pliocene marine invertebrate fauna of the Virginia Coastal Plain" (2008). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 838. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/838 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Examination of the abundance and geographic range of rare taxa: survivorship patterns of Miocene-Pliocene marine invertebrate fauna of the Virginia Coastal Plain A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Science in Geology from The College of William & Mary by Austin L. Pryor Accepted for ______________________________________ (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors) ___________________________________________ Karen M. Layou, co-chair, Department of Geology ___________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • New Decapods from the Navidad Formation (Miocene) of Chile
    JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 25(3): 427–449, 2005 NEW DECAPODS FROM THE NAVIDAD FORMATION (MIOCENE) OF CHILE Rodney M. Feldmann, Carrie E. Schweitzer, and Alfonso Encinas (RMF, correspondence) Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, U.S.A. ([email protected]); (CES) Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, Canton, Ohio 44720, U.S.A. ([email protected]); (AE) Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Geologı´a, Casilla 13518, Correo 21, Santiago, Chile ([email protected]) ABSTRACT A new Miocene decapod fauna is described from the Navidad Formation of coastal Chile. The fauna includes five callianassoid taxa, none of which is preserved sufficiently to identify to species level. New species include Calappilia? chilensis, Hepatus spinimarginatus, Proterocarcinus navidad, Pilumnus cucaoensis, and Pinnixa navidadensis. A possible rhizopine member of the Pilumnidae Samouelle, 1819, is described. Trichopeltarion levis Casadı´o et al., 2004, previously known from the late Oligocene of western Argentina, was also recovered from these rocks. Calappa circularis Beurlen, from the lower Miocene Pirabas Formation in Brazil, is herein referred to Calappilia. This report greatly increases the known number of fossil decapods from Chile and sets the stage for paleobiogeographic comparison of the decapod faunas of Chile and Argentina. The Neogene rock sequence in Chile is largely confined to M.S. thesis, added Callianassa sp. and a new species of crab about seven basins along the modern Pacific Ocean to the list. That material along with the newly collected (Ceccioni, 1980). These basins have been subject to extreme specimens will be discussed herein. vertical motion during the Neogene (Martı´nez-Pardo, 1990) so that rocks have been deposited at depths ranging from GEOLOGICAL SETTING shallow, inner shelf to bathyal.
    [Show full text]
  • 40Th NYSGA Annual Meeting 1968
    NEW YORK STATE GEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION GUIDEBOOK TO FIELD EXCURSIONS 40TH ANNUAL MEETING 1968 AT QUEENS COLLEGE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YO_RK FLUSHING, NEW YORK GUIDEBOOK to Field Excursions at the 40th Annual Meeting of the New York State Geological Association May 1968 Robert M. Finks, Editor Host: Department of Geology Queens College of The City University of New York Copies of this guidebook may be purchased from the Permanent Secretary, New York State Geological Association. Address Prof. Philip Hewitt, Department of Geology, State University College at Brockport, N. Y. 2 The organizer of the field trips described in this volume, and of the meeting at which they were given, is Professor Walter S. Newman President, NYSGA, 1968 3 CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Eugene A. Alexandrov, Queens College G. D. Bennett, U. S. Geological Survey Robert M. Finks, Queens College Leo M. Hall, University of Massachusetts David H. Krinsley, Queens College David J. Leveson, Brooklyn College James P. Minard, U. S. Geological Survey Walter S. Newman, Queens College James P. Owens, U. S. Geological Survey F. J. Pearson, U. S. Geological Survey N. M. Perlmutter, U. S. Geological Survey Nicholas M. Ratcliffe, City College E. Lynn Savage, Brooklyn College Carl K. Seyfert, Buffalo State University College Leslie A. Sirkin, Adelphi University Norman F. Sohl, U. S. Geological Survey David L. Thurber, Queens College Franklyn B. Van Houten, Princeton University 4 PREFACE The papers brought together in this Guidebook merit comparative reading at leisure, for they often bring to bear upon problems of the local geology many independent lines of evidence. Some matters that come immediately to mind out of personal interest are: (1) The relation of the New York City Group to the unmetamorphosed Cambro­ Ordovician sequence (Trips A, C, E, H).
    [Show full text]
  • PSEG POWER, LLC (Environmental Report), Rev. 0
    Occurrence in Formation/Unit Primary Lithologies Geologic Conditions Unit Thickness Site Area Quaternary Marsh deposits muck and peat; silt, sand and clay aggradation of Delaware Bay estuary variable thickness present over most of the site area in low lying areas Holocene ~~~~~~~~~~ unconformity ~~~~~~~~~~ DELAWARE NEW JERSEY Scotts Corners Formation outcrops in eastern and Cape May estuarine terrace deposits with coarse to fine sand and pebbles with Quaternary ~~ unconformity ~~ transgressive and regressive cycles western portions of the site concentrations of heavy minerals; peat; isolated fluvial deposits? variable thickness Formation area Group Lynch Heights Pleistocene Delaware Bay Formation ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ unconformity ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ regression and erosion CENOZOIC 90 feet at southern portions Kirkwood Formation clay silt and sand deposited in two or three marine cycles polycyclic transgression and regression phases subcrop only of site area; pinches out northward Upper Tertiary (Miocene) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ unconformity ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ regression and erosion Shark River Formation glauconitic sand and mudstone low sediment input 70 feet (Reference 2.6-10) subcrop only ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ unconformity ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ regression and erosion Tertiary Manasquan Formation lower glauconitic member; upper clayey sand to silt member low sediment input and bioturbation 40 feet (Reference 2.6-10) subcrop only ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Late Pleistocene Uplift, Chesapeake Bay Entrance
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 2-1965 Possible late Pleistocene uplift, Chesapeake Bay entrance W. Harrison RJ Malloy GA Rusnak J Terasmae Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Geology Commons VOLUME 73 NUMBER 2 THE JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY March 1965 POSSIBLE LATE PLEISTOCENE UPLIFT CHESAPEAKE BAY ENTRANCE1 W. HARRISON,2 R. J. MALLOY,3 GENE A. RUSNAK,4 AND J. TERASMAE5 ABSTRACT Paleontological and lithological studies of engineering borings and boring logs indicate that a buried, subaerial erosion surface of Pliocene (?)-Pleistocene age cuts across clastic sediments of pre-Yorktownian Miocene age in the subsurface and subbottom of the lower Chesapeake Bay area. When the bore-hole data are coupled with the results of subbottom echo profiling and piledriving records, it is possible to construct accurate cross sections of the buried Miocene-Pleistocene contact. The cross sections show "lows" in the erosion surface that may be correlated with the buried channels of the Pleistocene Elizabeth, James, York, and Susquehanna river valleys. Probable channel depths below mean low water at control points are: 100 feet (Elizabeth River, beneath Tunnel no. 1), 155 feet (James River, at Hampton Roads Tunnel), 120 feet (York River, at Yorktown), 158 feet (Susquehanna River, off Cape Charles City), and 160 feet (Susquehanna River, at Fisherman Island, Cape Charles). The channel depths of what is believed to be the buried Susquehanna River valley are less than expected when placed on a curve showing the expectable gradients of that stream during the time of the most-recent, maximum lowering of sea level (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Structure Contour Maps of Th E New Jersey Coastal Plain
    State of New Jersey Department of Conservation and Economic Devdopment H. Mat Adams, Commi._.cioner Division of Resource Development Kenneth H. Creveling, Director GENERALIZED STRUCTURE CONTOUR MAPS OF TH E NEW JERSEY COASTAL PLAIN by Horace G. Riehards F. H. Olmsted James L. Ruhle prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation wit£ the State of New Jersey Division of Water Policy and Supply George R Shanklin, Director 1962 .° Reprinted 1983 CONTENTS Abstract .... ; .................................................................. iii Introduction .................................................................. 1 1 Scope and purpose ........................................................ Acknowledgments ......................................................... 1 Previous work ................................................................. 2 Geologieal setting ............................................................. 3 Pre-Cretaceous rocks ........................................................... 12 Nonmarine Cretaceous sediments, undifferentiated ................................ 12 MerchantviUe Formation and Woodbury Clay .................................... 17 Englishtown Formation ........................................................ 19 Marshalltown Formation ...................................................... 19 Wenonah Formation and Mount Laurel Sand ...................................... 22 Navesink Formation . .'... : ..................................................... 22 Red Bank Sand ..............................................................
    [Show full text]