DOCSLIB.ORG

Mississippi Gulf Coast National Heritage Area Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mississippi Gulf Coast National Heritage Area Environmental Assessment MISSISSIPPI GULF COAST NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT May 2008 Mississippi Department of Marine Resources, Comprehensive Resource Management Plan and Coastal Environments, Inc. 2008. Mississippi Gulf Coast National Heritage Area Environmental Assessment. Prepared for National Park Service, Atlanta, GA. Contract No. 07-041, Biloxi, MS. MISSISSIPPI GULF COAST NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared By: Mississippi Department of Marine Resources Comprehensive Resource Management Plan Biloxi, MS And Coastal Environments, Inc. Biloxi, MS Baton Rouge, LA Prepared For: National Park Service Atlanta, GA May 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..........................................................................................................................................vi LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................................................vi 1.0 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION.................................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................1 1.2 PURPOSE OF PROPOSED ACTION....................................................................................................1 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION........................................................................................................................2 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ............................................................................................2 1.5 NEED FOR PROPOSED ACTION.......................................................................................................4 1.6 RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS....................................................................................6 1.7 DECISIONS TO BE MADE .................................................................................................................6 1.8 IMPACT TOPICS AND ISSUES...........................................................................................................7 1.8.1 ISSUES EVALUATED IN DETAIL ................................................................................................7 1.8.2 IMPACT MEASUREMENT ..........................................................................................................9 1.9 PERMITS...........................................................................................................................................9 2.0 ALTERNATIVES...................................................................................................................................10 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................................10 2.1.1 ALTERNATIVE A. NO ACTION...............................................................................................10 2.1.2 ALTERNATIVE B. CORRIDOR-CLUSTER .................................................................................11 2.1.3 ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE .................................................................18 2.1.4 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE.....................................................................................................18 2.2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED, BUT DISMISSED ...........................................................................19 2.3 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES................................................................................................18 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................18 3.1 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.........................................................................................19 3.2 GEOLOGY.......................................................................................................................................24 3.3 WATER RESOURCES AND WATER QUALITY................................................................................24 3.3.1 GROUNDWATER .....................................................................................................................24 3.3.2 SURFACE WATER....................................................................................................................25 3.3.3 WATER QUALITY....................................................................................................................26 3.4 VEGETATION AND WETLANDS ....................................................................................................26 3.5 WILDLIFE AND FISH......................................................................................................................28 3.5.1 TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE .........................................................................................................28 3.5.2 BIRDS AND WATERFOWL .......................................................................................................28 3.5.3 FISH RESOURCES.....................................................................................................................29 3.6 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES.................................................................................29 iii 3.7 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................30 3.7.1 DEMOGRAPHICS .....................................................................................................................30 3.7.2 ECONOMY AND TRENDS ........................................................................................................31 3.7.3 AESTHETIC AND SCENIC RESOURCES....................................................................................31 3.7.4 RECREATION RESOURCES ......................................................................................................32 3.8 CULTURAL, HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES................................................33 3.8.1 HISTORIC OVERVIEW AND SIGNIFICANCE............................................................................33 3.8.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES..........................................................................................................35 3.8.3 HISTORIC RESOURCES ............................................................................................................35 3.8.4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................36 3.8.5 THREATS TO CULTURAL, HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ........................37 3.8.6 NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCES ...........................................................................................38 3.9 AIR QUALITY.................................................................................................................................38 3.10 NOISE.............................................................................................................................................38 3.11 HAZARDOUS, TOXIC, AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE......................................................................39 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ...............................................................................................................39 4.1 GEOLOGY.......................................................................................................................................40 4.2 WATER RESOURCES AND WATER QUALITY................................................................................40 4.3 VEGETATION / WETLANDS..........................................................................................................40 4.4 FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES .................................................................................................40 4.5 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES.................................................................................41 4.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT.................................................................................................41 4.6.1 POPULATION AND ECONOMY ...............................................................................................41 4.6.2 AESTHETIC AND SCENIC RESOURCES....................................................................................42 4.6.3 RECREATION RESOURCES ......................................................................................................42 4.7 CULTURAL, HISTORIC, AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ...................................................42 4.8 AIR QUALITY.................................................................................................................................44 4.9 NOISE.............................................................................................................................................44 4.10 HAZARDOUS, TOXIC, AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE......................................................................44 4.11 ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AND CONSERVATION .........................................................................44 4.12 NATURAL OR DEPLETABLE RESOURCES......................................................................................44 4.13 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS.................................................................................................................45 4.13.1 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE ....................................................................................................50
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Forests in Mississippi
    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Land and Resource Management Plan National Forests in Mississippi Forest Supervisor’s Office – Jackson, Mississippi Bienville National Forest – Forest, Mississippi Delta National Forest – Rolling Fork, Mississippi De Soto National Forest: Chickasawhay Ranger District – Laurel, Mississippi De Soto Ranger District - Wiggins, Mississippi Holly Springs National Forest – Oxford, Mississippi (Includes the Yalobusha Unit) Homochitto National Forest – Meadville, Mississippi Tombigbee National Forest – Ackerman, Mississippi (Includes the Ackerman and Trace Units) Responsible Official: Elizabeth Agpaoa, Regional Forester Southern Region
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Affected Environment
    3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter of the Kemper County IGCC Project EIS presents information describing environmental and other resources that might potentially be affected by the proposed action or analyzed alternatives; it serves as a baseline from which the proposed project’s impacts are evaluated. This chapter describes the existing or baseline conditions of resources relative to the three major components of the proposed project: (1) the power plant, which is the component of the project that would be supported by the proposed action (funding and loan guarantee), and several offsite connected actions, including (2) the lignite surface mine, and (3) various linear facilities (pipelines and electric power lines). Environmental characteristics of the affected sites and rights-of-way, as well as their immediate surroundings, are described to levels of detail commensurate with importance of the issues or potential impacts. In most sections baseline conditions are described in detail. However, in some other sections, given the nature of some aspects of this project and the limited potential to impact some environmental resources, relatively brief information is provided to describe the existing environmental characteristics or baseline conditions. The information and data provided in this chapter were gathered during field surveys as well as drawn from literature reports, maps, databases, and other publicly available sources. Sources include specific, project- related environmental documents and permit applications that have previously been filed. The information is pre- sented in the following sections, which describe the physical, biological, environmental, socioeconomic, cultural, and aesthetic and other features and conditions of the project areas and their surroundings: • 3.2—Regional Setting and General Area • 3.11—Wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 the Pascagoula River Basin
    Contents Water—Our Precious Natural Resource. 3 Mississippi’s Water Resources . 4 Welcome to the Pascagoula River Basin . 6 Special Plants and Animals of the Pascagoula River Basin . 13 Land Use and Its Effects on Water Quality . 16 Water Quality in the Pascagoula River Basin . 21 Gulf Region Water and Wastewater Plan . 26 Mississippi’s Basin Management Approach . 27 Priority Watersheds . 28 Agencies and Organizations Cooperating for Improved Water Quality . 33 Sustaining Our Environmental Resources and Economic Development . 35 About this Guide Acknowledgments Mississippi’s Citizen’s Guides to Water This guide is a product of the Basin Team for the Quality are intended to inform you about: Pascagoula River Basin, consisting of representatives from 39 state and federal Mississippi’s abundant water resources agencies and stakeholder organizations (see Natural features, human activities, and pages 33–34 of this document for a complete water quality in a particular river basin listing). The lead agency for developing, distributing, and funding this guide is the The importance of a healthy environ- Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality ment to a strong economy (MDEQ). This effort was completed in 2008 under a Clean Water Act Section 319 Nonpoint Watersheds targeted for water quality restoration and protection activities Source grant, and includes publication services from Tetra Tech, Inc. How to participate in protecting or Copies of this guide may be obtained by restoring water quality contacting: Mississippi Department of Whom to contact for more information Environmental Quality Office of Pollution Control We hope these guides will enhance the 515 East Amite Street dialogue between citizens and key decision Jackson, MS 39201 makers to help improve our management 601-961-5171 of Mississippi’s precious water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G3937 SOUTH CENTRAL STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3937 FEATURES, ETC. .M5 Mississippi Sound 733 G3942 EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES. REGIONS, G3942 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .N3 Natchez Trace .N32 Natchez Trace National Parkway .N34 Natchez Trace National Scenic Trail .P5 Pickwick Lake .T4 Tennessee River 734 G3952 KENTUCKY. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3952 .A2 Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site .B3 Barkley, Lake .B34 Barren River .B35 Barren River Lake .B4 Beaver Creek Wilderness .B5 Big Sandy River .B55 Blue Grass Region .B7 Brier Creek [Whitley County] .B8 Buck Creek .C3 Cave Run Lake .C48 Clanton Creek .C5 Clarks River .C53 Clear Creek .C54 Clear Fork [Whitley County] .C6 Clifty Wilderness .C8 Cumberland, Lake .C83 Cumberland River, Big South Fork [TN & KY] .D3 Daniel Boone National Forest .F5 FIVCO Area Development District .G75 Green River .G76 Green River Lake .H4 Herrington Lake .H85 Humphrey Creek .J3 Jackson Purchase .K3 Kentucky, Northern .K35 Kentucky Highway 80 .K4 Kentucky Lake .K44 Kentucky River .L3 Land Between the Lakes .L38 Laurel River Lake .L4 Lee Cave .M29 Mammoth Cave .M3 Mammoth Cave National Park .M5 Mill Springs Battlefield .N63 Nolin Lake .N64 Nolin River .P4 Pennyrile Area Development District .P6 Port Oliver Lake .P8 Purchase Area Development District .R3 Raven Run Nature Sanctuary .R34 Redbird Crest Trail .R4 Red River Gorge .R68 Rough River .R69 Rough River Lake .S6 Snows Pond .T3 Taylorsville Lake .W5 White Sulphur ATV Trail 735 G3953 KENTUCKY. COUNTIES G3953 .A2 Adair .A4 Allen .A5 Anderson .B2
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Resource Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement
    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Land and Resource Management Plan National Forests in Mississippi Forest Supervisor’s Office – Jackson, Mississippi Bienville National Forest – Forest, Mississippi Delta National Forest – Rolling Fork, Mississippi De Soto National Forest – Chickasawhay Ranger District – Laurel, Mississippi De Soto Ranger District - Wiggins, Mississippi Holly Springs National Forest – Oxford, Mississippi (Includes the Yalobusha Unit) Homochitto National Forest – Meadville, Mississippi Tombigbee National Forest – Ackerman, Mississippi (Includes the Ackerman and Trace Units) Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Elizabeth Agpaoa, Regional Forester Southern Region 1720 Peachtree Road, NW Atlanta, GA 30309 Cooperating Agency: USDI Bureau of Land Management Eastern States, Southeastern States Field Office Bruce E. Dawson, Field Manager 411 Briarwood Drive, Suite 404 Jackson, MS 39206 For Information Contact: Margrett L.
    [Show full text]
  • Chunky-Okatibbee Watershed Implementation Plan
    Chunky-Okatibbee Watershed Implementation Plan Prepared by: Eco-Systems, Inc Prepared for: East Mississippi Foothills Land Trust May 2007 Watershed Implementation Plan Chunky-Okatibbee Watershed Project May 2007 1.0 Executive Summary .................................................................................3 2.0 Introduction ..............................................................................................6 2.1 Vision Statement ....................................................................................7 2.2 Mission Statement ..................................................................................7 2.3 Watershed Implementation Team ...........................................................7 3.0 Watershed Description ..........................................................................11 3.1 Overview...............................................................................................11 3.2 Demographics and Primary Land Uses ................................................15 3.3 Physical Geology..................................................................................18 3.4 Wetlands...............................................................................................18 3.5 Environmental Management Areas ......................................................19 3.6 Parks and Recreational Areas ..............................................................20 4.0 Stakeholder Interests.............................................................................23 4.1 Survey
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of April 1979, Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia
    FLOODS OF APRIL 1979, MISSISSIPPI, ALABAMA, AND GEORGIA Report prepared jointly by the U.S. Geological Survey and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1319 Floods of April 1979, MISSISSIPPI, ALABAMA, AND GEORGIA FRONTISPIECE. Sequence of photographs showing the destruction of the bridge on State Highway 50 over the Tallapoosa River below Martin Dam near Tallassee, Ala., about 1630 CST, April 14, 1979. Photographs courtesy of H. H. Weldon, Electic, Ala. FLOODS OF APRIL 1979, MISSISSIPPI, ALABAMA, AND GEORGIA By GEORGE W. EDELEN, JR., K. V. WILSON, and JOE R. HARKINS, U.S. Geological Survey, and JOHN F. MILLER and EDWIN H. CHIN, National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1319 Report prepared jointly by the U.S. Geological Survey and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1986 UNITED STATES UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary MALCOLM BALDRIDGE, Secretary NATIONAL OCEANIC AND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Dallas L. Peck, Director Anthony J. Calio, Administrator Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Floods of April 1979, Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia (Geological Survey professional paper; 1319) "Report prepared jointly by the U.S. Geological Survey and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration." Bibliography: p. 45 1. Floods Mississippi. 2. Floods Alabama 3. Floods Georgia I. Edelen, George W. II. Geological Survey (U.S.) III. United States. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Conditions for Sediment in the Pascagoula River Basin, Mississippi
    Channel and Watershed Processes Research Unit National Sedimentation Laboratory Oxford, Mississippi REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR SEDIMENT IN THE PASCAGOULA RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI By Lauren Farrugia and Andrew Simon April 2005 REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR SEDIMENT IN THE PASCAGOULA RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI Prepared by U.S. Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service National Sedimentation Laboratory Channel and Watershed Process Research Unit For Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality May 2005 Suspended-Sediment Reference Conditions: Pascagoula River Basin iii ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR SEDIMENT IN THE PASCAGOULA RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI ARS Designated Representative and Project Manager: Carlos V. Alonso Technical Direction, Data Analysis: Andrew Simon and Lauren Farrugia Report Preparation: Lauren Farrugia Mapping, GIS and Interactive CD: Danny Klimetz Field Operations and Database Management: Mark Griffith and Lauren Farrugia Field Data Collection and Data Processing: Mark Griffith, Lauren Farrugia, Danny Klimetz, Brian Bell, and Micah Findiesen. Suspended-Sediment Reference Conditions: Pascagoula River Basin iv ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Seven segments within the Pascagoula River Basin are listed as having impaired conditions for aquatic life due to sediment. An additional twelve sites in the basin are listed for
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D - Special Areas: Status, Trends and Strategies
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region Appendix D - Special Areas: Status, Trends and Strategies Prepared for Land Management Plan Revision December 2012 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Land Management Plan Revision Environmental Impact Statement Table of Contents D.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................... D-1 D.2 Designated Special Areas ........................................................................................................................... D-1 D.2.1 Bienville Pines Scenic Area (Bienville
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2020 Forest Service WO Lands FS–383 November 2020 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To find: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters (cm) Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters (m) Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers (km) Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares (ha) Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters (m2) Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters (m) Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers (km2) Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms (kg) United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS–383 System November 2020 As of September 30, 2020 USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250–0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover photo: Mount Ogden, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Utah Photo by Eric Greenwood, USDA Forest Service, Region 4, Recreation Lands & Minerals i Statistics are current as of: 10/19/2020 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 193,041,851 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), administers 134 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 449 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Survey of Aquatic Plant Species in Mississippi Waterbodies
    2020 Survey of Aquatic Plant Species in Mississippi Waterbodies A report submitted to the Mississippi Aquatic Invasive Species Council Gray Turnage, Andrew Sample, and Colin McLeod Mississippi State University, Geosystems Research Institute Starkville, MS 39759 GRI Report #5086 October 2020 2020 Survey of Aquatic Plant Species in Mississippi Waterbodies Gray Turnage, Andrew Sample, and Colin McLeod Mississippi State University, Geosystems Research Institute Executive Summary Conclusions • Only two lakes (George and Lower) and three rivers/creeks (Homochitto and Little Hatchie rivers and Hickahala creek) in this survey had a plant assemblages entirely composed of native aquatic and riparian plant species. • There were 40 new plant species observed in the lake survey; of which, 6 were non- native species (all riparian). • Overall, there were 119 aquatic and riparian plant species observed in the river/creek surveys; of which, 18 were non-native. • Alligatorweed (Alternanthera philoxeroides: 7 waterbodies), water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes: 4 waterbodies, and Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera: 4 waterbodies) were the most widespread non-native aquatic plant species found in lakes. • Alligatorweed (Alternanthera philoxeroides: 14 waterbodies), Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera: 7 waterbodies), and common reed (Phragmites australis: 5 waterbodies were the most widespread non-native aquatic plant species found in rivers and lakes. Recommendations • Continue monitoring waterbodies within Mississippi for the presence of non-native aquatic plant species. • Implement early detection, rapid response (EDRR) management options on populations of those non-native aquatic plant species known to be in Mississippi, specifically small isolated populations before they spread to other sites. • Determine suitable goals for management of large populations of non-native aquatic plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section N
    N-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine Na Guardis Island (Spain) Naassenes USE Trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine USE Guardia Island (Spain) [BT1437] N-3 fatty acids Na Hang Nature Reserve (Vietnam) BT Gnosticism USE Omega-3 fatty acids USE Khu bảo tồn thiên nhiên Nà Hang (Vietnam) Nāatas N-6 fatty acids Na-hsi (Chinese people) USE Navayats USE Omega-6 fatty acids USE Naxi (Chinese people) Naath (African people) N.113 (Jet fighter plane) Na-hsi language USE Nuer (African people) USE Scimitar (Jet fighter plane) USE Naxi language Naath language N.A.M.A. (Native American Music Awards) Na Ih Es (Apache rite) USE Nuer language USE Native American Music Awards USE Changing Woman Ceremony (Apache rite) Naaude language N-acetylhomotaurine Na-Kara language USE Ayiwo language USE Acamprosate USE Nakara language Nab River (Germany) N Bar N Ranch (Mont.) Na-khi (Chinese people) USE Naab River (Germany) BT Ranches—Montana USE Naxi (Chinese people) Nabā, Jabal (Jordan) N Bar Ranch (Mont.) Na-khi language USE Nebo, Mount (Jordan) BT Ranches—Montana USE Naxi language Naba Kalebar Festival N-benzylpiperazine Na language USE Naba Kalebar Yatra USE Benzylpiperazine USE Sara Kaba Náà language Naba Kalebar Yatra (May Subd Geog) n-body problem Na-len-dra-pa (Sect) (May Subd Geog) UF Naba Kalebar Festival USE Many-body problem [BQ7675] BT Fasts and feasts—Hinduism N-butyl methacrylate UF Na-lendra-pa (Sect) Naba language USE Butyl methacrylate Nalendrapa (Sect) USE Nabak language N-carboxy-aminoacid-anhydrides BT Buddhist sects Nabagraha (Hindu deity) (Not Subd Geog) USE Amino acid anhydrides Sa-skya-pa (Sect) [BL1225.N38-BL1225.N384] N-cars Na-lendra-pa (Sect) BT Hindu gods USE General Motors N-cars USE Na-len-dra-pa (Sect) Nabak language (May Subd Geog) N Class (Destroyers) (Not Subd Geog) Na Maighdeanacha (Northern Ireland) UF Naba language BT Destroyers (Warships) USE Maidens, The (Northern Ireland) Wain language N.
    [Show full text]