DOCSLIB.ORG

Foreign Policy Evaluation and the Utility of Intervention Graham Slater [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foreign Policy Evaluation and the Utility of Intervention Graham Slater Gslat001@Fiu.Edu Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-31-2017 Foreign Policy Evaluation and the Utility of Intervention Graham Slater [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC001754 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the American Politics Commons, Cognition and Perception Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Policy Commons, Terrorism Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Slater, Graham, "Foreign Policy Evaluation and the Utility of Intervention" (2017). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3217. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3217 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida FOREIGN POLICY EVALUATION AND THE UTILITY OF INTERVENTION A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS by Graham Slater 2017 To: Dean John Stack, Jr. Green School of International and Public Affairs This dissertation, written by Graham Slater, and entitled Foreign Policy Evaluation and the Utility of Intervention, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. ___________________________________ John F. Clark ___________________________________ Eduardo Gamarra ___________________________________ April Merleaux ___________________________________ Pablo Toral ___________________________________ Félix E. Martín, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 31, 2017 The dissertation of Graham Slater is approved. ___________________________________ John F. Stack, Jr. Dean of Green School of International and Public Affairs ___________________________________ Andrés Gil Vice President for Research and Economic Development Dean of the University Graduate School Florida International University, 2017 ii © Copyright 2017 by Graham Slater All rights reserved . iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of the committee, some of the fellow graduate students off of whom I have bounced suspect contentions and questionable assertions, the illustrious members of my wonderfully fallible family, among whom there exists a Doctor of Philosophy in the Anthropological Sciences, esteemed girlfriend, Valerie Hudson, whose magisterial Foreign Policy Analysis informs this book at many junctures, even if cited only sparingly, and with which I taught FPA at FIU, my dissertation-friend Jim Misencik, decorated veteran of the Iraq War and tireless academician, and dissertation-father Félix Martín, who considers his trade a lifestyle and consistently prioritizes his graduate students far above the meager place they occupy in the international system, thus maximizing their utility-function if not their relative power. This dissertation is dedicated to my actual dad and others like him who bear the brunt of foreign-policy blunder before ever encountering the opportunity to understand why. It is my hope that its Lilliputian contribution to scholarship can lend a hand in bettering the status quo ante with regard to the motivations for and prosecution of foreign-policy decisionmaking in this, my beautifully flawed state of states, in the further hope that it will make itself great(er) in substance and values (as a continuation of prior greatness) as the sometimes-preeminent exemplar in our anarchical morass of confused nations. I apologize in advance for the quagmire of long-winded sentences contained herein, but a product of my longstanding quarrel with superfluous commas. iv ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION FOREIGN POLICY EVALUATION AND THE UTILITY OF INTERVENTION by Graham Slater Florida International University, 2017 Miami, Florida Professor Félix E. Martín, Major Professor This dissertation identifies and explains the factors contributing to the presence and severity of U.S. foreign-policy blunders, or gross errors in strategic judgment resulting in significant harm to the national interest, since the Second World War. It hypothesizes that the grand strategy of preponderance and the overestimation of military power to transform the politics of other states have precipitated U.S. foreign-policy blunders since 1945. Examining the Vietnam War and Iraq War as case studies, it focuses on underlying conditions in the American national identity and the problematic foreign policy decision-making (FPDM) that corresponds to this bifurcated hypothesis, termed the overestimation/preponderance theoretical model (OPM). Four indicators operationalize the OPM: (1) how U.S. foreign policymakers estimated the capacity of military power to transform the political dynamics of the target state through intervention; (2) and (3) how U.S. actors and institutions affected the capacity of the partner state and hostile state and nonstate actors; and (4) how the foreign policy was justified and rationalized within the leadership of v government and to the general public as it encountered disconfirming information. In each case, the grand strategy of preponderance instituted a bounded rationality of mission in the FPDM stage and the operationalization stage that precluded the inclusion of an unfavorable outcome. In each case, U.S. foreign policymakers greatly overestimated the capacity of the partner state to establish security and legitimacy and underestimated the capacity of hostile actors to mobilize and threaten the partner state. However, these preference-confirmation biases diametrically contradicted the assessment that victory would be easy to achieve; U.S. foreign policymakers promulgated this corresponding overestimation/underestimation even while inflating the threat far beyond what the actual threat to the national-security element of the national interest represented. The subsequent implementing of this inverted calculation created a national-security national interest where none was extant, then significantly harmed that new interest via intervention. This tactical application of the grand strategy of preponderance facilitated the strategic-tactical gap in U.S. foreign policy by creating monsters in order to have monsters to slay, consistent with the ideological tradition of the imperative of crusade in the modern history of American foreign relations. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1: The Strategic-Tactical Gap in U.S. Grand Strategy...........................................1 2: Toward a Process for Foreign Policy Evaluation.............................................13 3: Historical Progenitors of Preponderance and the OPM Model........................53 4: Methodology..................................................................................................105 5: The Strategic-Tactical Gap of the Vietnam War............................................141 6: The Iraq War: FPDM Prisms and the Man behind the Curtain......................276 7: The Infinite Multidimensionality of Foreign Policy Analysis............................377 Bibliography.......................................................................................................470 VITA..................................................................................................................499 vii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1. Competing visions of grand strategy (Barry Posen)........................................77 2. U.S. Casualties of the Vietnam War..............................................................176 3. U.S. troops in Vietnam...................................................................................239 4. PAVN infiltration of the South........................................................................239 5. Gallup poll, "Was it a mistake sending troops to Vietnam?"......................... 243 6. U.S. fatalities in Vietnam................................................................................244 7. Summary of costs of war in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Syria, and Homeland Security, FY2001-FY2016............................................................297 8. Pew Research Center, "Do you support the decision to use force in Iraq?"..371 9. Major levels of analysis in FPA (Valerie Hudson)..........................................378 10. George Modelski's "Long Cycles"................................................................434 11. U.S. accounts for more than a third of global military spending...................447 12. U.S. Military spending as a share of total discretionary budget...................448 viii ACRONYMS (IN ORDER OF APPEARANCE) Chapter 1. FPDM: Foreign Policy Decision-Making FPA: Foreign Policy Analysis FPE: Foreign Policy Evaluation OPM: Overestimation/Preponderance Model IR: International Relations (as a field of social-scientific inquiry) Chapter 2. MAD: Mutually Assured Destruction AUMF: Authorization for the Use of Military Force Chapter 3. MID: Militarized Interstate Dispute NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organization HST: Hegemonic Stability Theory DPT: Democratic Peace Theory CIA: Central Intelligence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rhetorical Antecedents to Vietnam, 1945-1965
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette College of Communication Faculty Research and Publications Communication, College of 9-1-2018 The Rhetorical Antecedents to Vietnam, 1945-1965 Gregory R. Olson Marquette University George N. Dionisopoulos San Diego State University Steven R. Goldzwig Marquette University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/comm_fac Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Olson, Gregory R.; Dionisopoulos, George N.; and Goldzwig, Steven R., "The Rhetorical Antecedents to Vietnam, 1945-1965" (2018). College of Communication Faculty Research and Publications. 511. https://epublications.marquette.edu/comm_fac/511 The Rhetorical Antecedents to Vietnam, 1945–1965 Gregory A. Olson, George N. Dionisopoulos, and Steven R. Goldzwig 8 I do not believe that any of the Presidents who have been involved with Viet- nam, Presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, or President Nixon, foresaw or desired that the United States would become involved in a large scale war in Asia. But the fact remains that a steady progression of small decisions and actions over a period of 20 years had forestalled a clear-cut decision by the President or by the President and Congress—decision as to whether the defense of South Vietnam and involvement in a great war were necessary to the security and best interest of the United States. —Senator John Sherman Cooper (R-KY), Congressional Record, 1970 n his 1987 doctoral thesis, General David Petraeus wrote of Vietnam: “We do not take the time to understand the nature of the society in which we are f ght- Iing, the government we are supporting, or the enemy we are f ghting.”1 After World War II, when the United States chose Vietnam as an area for nation building as part of its Cold War strategy, little was known about that exotic land.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 2) FOIA Appeals Log for Calendar Year 2017 3) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log for Calendar Year 2017
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Central Imeltigence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 16 January 2019 Mr. John Greenewald, Jr. 27305 West Live Oak Road Suite #1203 Castaic, CA 91384 Reference: F-20 18-00766 Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is a final response to your 28 January 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for copies of the following: 1) FOIA Case Log for calendar year 2017 2) FOIA Appeals Log for calendar year 2017 3) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log for calendar year 2017 Enclosed are copies of the FOIA and the MDR case logs, consisting of 97 pages, for the calendar year 2017. Please note the case logs are unavailable in electronic format. The information includes the date the case was created, the case number, and the subject of the request, which includes cases in Item 2. Because you are entitled to the first 100 pages free, there is no charge for processing this request. With respect to Item 2, the Agency does not maintain or create appeals log containing only FOIA appeals, which would require us to create a new record in response to a FOIA request. If you have questions regarding our response, you may seek assistance from CIA's FOIA Public Liaison.
    [Show full text]
  • The Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Review
    PASSPORT THE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIANS OF AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS REVIEW VOLUME 52, NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 2021 IN THIS ISSUE A Conversation with David Langbart Principles in Power: A Roundtable FDR and the Transformation of Power ...AND MORE Passport THE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIANS OF AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS REVIEW Editor Andrew L. Johns, Brigham Young University Assistant Editor Brionna Mendoza, The Ohio State University Production Editor Julie Rojewski, Michigan State University Editorial Advisory Board Kelly McFarland, Georgetown University (2019-2021) Michael Brenes, Yale University (2020-2022) Amanda Demmer, Virginia Tech (2021-2023) Founding Editors Mitchell Lerner, The Ohio State University (2003-2011) William J. Brinker, Tennessee Technological University (1980-2003) Nolan Fowler, Tennessee Technological University (1973-1980) Gerald E. Wheeler, San Jose State College (1969-1973) Cover Image: December, 1942. Franklin D. Roosevelt being presented a globe by the United States Army at the White House in Washington, D.C. Courtesy of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library & Museum. Photo ID: Photo ID: 61244. Passport Editorial Office: SHAFR Business Office: Andrew Johns Amy Sayward, Executive Director Department of History Department of History Brigham Young University Middle Tennessee State University 2161 JFSB, Provo, UT 84602 1301 East Main Street, Box 23 [email protected] Murfreesboro, TN 37132 801-422-8942 (phone) [email protected] 801-422-0275 (fax) 615-898-2569 Passport is published three times per year (April, September, January), by the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, and is distributed to all members of the Society. Submissions should be sent to the attention of the editor, and are acceptable in all formats, although electronic copy by email to [email protected] is preferred.
    [Show full text]
  • Air America in South Vietnam I – from the Days of CAT to 1969
    Air America in South Vietnam I From the days of CAT to 1969 by Dr. Joe F. Leeker First published on 11 August 2008, last updated on 24 August 2015 I) At the times of CAT Since early 1951, a CAT C-47, mostly flown by James B. McGovern, was permanently based at Saigon1 to transport supplies within Vietnam for the US Special Technical and Economic Mission, and during the early fifties, American military and economic assistance to Indochina even increased. “In the fall of 1951, CAT did obtain a contract to fly in support of the Economic Aid Mission in FIC [= French Indochina]. McGovern was assigned to this duty from September 1951 to April 1953. He flew a C-47 (B-813 in the beginning) throughout FIC: Saigon, Hanoi, Phnom Penh, Vientiane, Nhatrang, Haiphong, etc., averaging about 75 hours a month. This was almost entirely overt flying.”2 CAT’s next operations in Vietnam were Squaw I and Squaw II, the missions flown out of Hanoi in support of the French garrison at Dien Bien Phu in 1953/4, using USAF C-119s painted in the colors of the French Air Force; but they are described in the file “Working in Remote Countries: CAT in New Zealand, Thailand-Burma, French Indochina, Guatemala, and Indonesia”. Between mid-May and mid-August 54, the CAT C-119s continued dropping supplies to isolated French outposts and landed loads throughout Vietnam. When the Communists incited riots throughout the country, CAT flew ammunition and other supplies from Hanoi to Saigon, and brought in tear gas from Okinawa in August.3 Between 12 and 14 June 54, CAT captain
    [Show full text]
  • September 2012 Passport the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Review Volume 43, Number 2, September 2012
    asspVolume 43, Number 2,rtSeptember 2012 PThe Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Review Inside... A Roundtable Discussion on Hiroshi Kitamura’s Screening Enlightenment The State of the FRUS Series The Sheridan Press The Convergence of Military and Diplomatic History ...and much more! Passport The Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Review Editor Andrew L. Johns, Brigham Young University Consulting Editor Mitchell Lerner, The Ohio State University Production Editor Julie Rojewski, Michigan State University Editorial Assistant David Hadley, The Ohio State University Editorial Advisory Board and Terms of Appointment Robert Brigham, Vassar College (2010-2012) George White, Jr., York College/CUNY (2011-2013) Kimber Quinney, California State University-San Marcos (2012-2014) Cover Photo: At The Movies in the Early 1950s. Courtesy of John W. Bennett Archive, Rare Books and Manuscripts Library. The Ohio State University Libraries. All Rights Reserved. Passport Editorial Office: Peter Hahn, SHAFR Executive Director Mershon Center for International Security Studies, 1501 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43201 [email protected] 614-292-1681 (phone) 614-292-2407 (fax) Passport is published three times per year (April, September, January), by the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, and is distributed to all members of the Society. Submissions should be sent to the attention of the editor, and are acceptable in all formats, although electronic copy by email to [email protected] is preferred. Submissions should follow the guidelines articulated in the Chicago Manual of Style. Manuscripts accepted for publication will be edited to conform to Passport style, space limitations, and other requirements. The author is responsible for accuracy and for obtaining all permissions necessary for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • An Nbc News White Paper Vietnam Hindsight Part Ii
    AN NBC NEWS WHITE PAPER VIETNAM HINDSIGHT PART II: THE DEATH OF DIEM BROADCAST: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 22, 1971 10:00 - 11:00 CREDITS Opening Title: NBC NEWS WHITE PAPER VIETNAM HINDSIGHT PART II: DEATH OF DIEM Credits: NBC NEWS WHITE PAPER VIETNAM HINDSIGHT Copyright c The National Broadcasting Co., Inc. 1971 All Rights Reserved Produced and Written By FRED FREED Directed by PAMELA HILL Associate Producers ALVIN DAVIS PAMELA HILL Researcher HELEN WHITNEY Production Assistant BARBARA SPENCE Film Researcher JACK GOELMAN Unit Manager KLAUS HEYS Supervising Film Editor DARROLD MURRAY Film Editors MARY ANN MARTIN STUART M. ROSENBERG DAVID J. SAUL JEAN BAGLEY Cameramen STEVE PETROPOULOS WILLIAM RICHARDS Sound JAMES ZOLTOWSKI JOSE VALLE JOHN SINGLETON JEROME GOLD HENRY ROSSEAU IRVING GANS SHELLY FIELMAN Still Pictures by JACQUES LOWE BLACK STAR MAGNUM GEORGES TAMES - THE NEW YORK TIMES THE JOHN F. KENNEDY LIBRARY YOICHI CKOMOTO HORST ?HAAS PEOPLE WHO WERE INTERVIEWED FOR VIETNAM HINDSIGHT IN ORDER OF THEIR APPEARANCE AND POSITION HELD AT THE TIME GEORGE BALL Under-Secretary of State 1961-1966 MAXWELL TAYLOR- Military Adviser to JFK 1961 Chairman of the Joint Chiefs 1962- 64 JOHN KENNETH GALBRAITH Ambassador to India 1961-63 DAVID HALBERSTAM Correspondent - New York Times - Vietnam 1962-63 WALT M. ROSTOW Deputy Special Assistant to the President for National Security 1961-64 MME. NHU Wife of Ngo Dinh Nhu, sister-in-law of Ngo Dinh Diem ARTHUR SCHLESINGER Special Assistant to the President 1961-64 PAUL HARKINS US Military Commander - Vietnam 1962-64 • JOHN VANN American Military Adviser in Vietnam MICHAEL FORRESTAL Senior Member - White House National Security Staff 1962-66 ROGER HILSMAN Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs 1963-64 ■ RUFUS PHILLIPS American AID Mission - Vietnam -2- FREDERICK NOLTING U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy and the Advisory Effort for Regime Change in South
    Imperial Camelot: John F. Kennedy and the Advisory Effort for Regime Change in South Vietnam, 1962-1963 A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Millersville University of Pennsylvania In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Shane M. Marino © 2018 Shane M. Marino May 2018 This Thesis for the Master of Arts Degree by Shane Michael Marino has been approved on behalf of the Graduate School by Thesis Committee: Dr. John M, McLarnon III (Signature on file) Research Advisor Dr. Tracey Weis (Signature on file) Committee Member Dr. Abam B. Lawrence (Signature on file) Committee Member May 10, 2018 Date ii ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS IMPERIAL CAMELOT: JOHN F. KENNEDY AND THE ADIVSORY EFFORT FOR REGIME CHANGE IN SOUTH VIETNAM, 1962-1963 By Shane M. Marino Millersville University, 2018 Millersville, Pennsylvania Directed by Dr. John McLarnon This thesis uses government documents, oral histories, and secondary sources to explore changes in the Kennedy administration’s Vietnam policy to determine the factors that contributed to the decision to support a coup d’état in 1963 that overthrew the President of the Republic of Vietnam and subsequently led to his assassination. The thesis specifically looks to connect administrative changes in organization and personnel to changes in policy that ultimately determined the fate of the Ngo Dinh Diem regime. In general, this thesis reveals that rejection of military intervention led to the adoption of a kind of political aggression that envisioned covert regime change as an acceptable alternative to the use of combat troops.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log, 2010-2016
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log, 2010-2016 Requested date: 24-October-2016 Released date: 21-November-2016 Posted date: 12-December-2016 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Central Intelligence Agency Washington. D.C. 20505 21 November 2016 Reference: F-2017-00161 This is a final response to your 24 October 2016 Freedom of Information Act request for copies of the Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log maintained by the Central Intelligence Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam August-December 1963
    III. THE COUP AGAINST THE DIEM GOVERNMENT, OCTOBER 23- NOVEMBER 2: DIFFERING INTERPRE?XIONS OF U.S. POLICY TOWARD COUP PLOTTING, EFFORTS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ON A POTENTIAL COUP, LODGE-DIEM DISCUSSIONS, U.S. ASSESSMENTS OF A COUP, THE COUP, THE DEATHS OF NHU AND DIEM 209. Editorial Note In CIA telegram [document number not declassified] from Saigon, October 23, Lodge reported that he had talked with Harkins on the afternoon of October 23 about the U.S. approach to coup planning against Diem. Harkins confirmed that in his conversation with General Don on October 22 he had warned Don of Colonel Khuong’s approach to one of his Military Assistance Command officers. (See Document 206.) According to Lodge, Harkins stated. that his purpose in offering Don the warning was to discourage Vietnamese military officers from approaching U.S. officers on political matters. Lodge stated that he reminded Harkins of the guidance on coup planning that Washington had sent. (Document 192) Harkins responded, according to Lodge, that he understood this guidance to mean that the United States did not favor a coup. Lodge countered as follows: “I explained that while it was true that the USG did not desire to initiate a coup, we had instructions from the highest levels not to thwart any change of government which gives promises of increasing the effectiveness of the military effort, insuring popular support to win the war, and improving working relations with the U.S. , . General Harkins expressed regret if he had inadvertently upset any delicate arrangements in progress and added that he would inform General Don that his remarks of 22 October did not convey official USG thinking.” (Kennedy Library, National Security Files, Vietnam Coun- try Series, CIA Reports; ellipsis in the text of the telegram) Don was understandably concerned about the differing signals on coup planning which he was receiving from Harkins and Conein.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Business to Public Service: Robert Mcnamara's Management Techniques and Their Limits in Peace And
    Private Business to Public Service: Robert McNamara’s Management Techniques and Their Limits in Peace and War by Albert J. Beveridge A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland May, 2014 © 2014 Albert J. Beveridge All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT This dissertation evaluates Robert S. McNamara’s management practices during his tenure as Secretary of Defense, concluding that over- centralized decision-making proved to be the central feature of his management style with one significant exception. When it came to war, notably the Vietnam War, he undermanaged important aspects of that conflict. To better understand McNamara’s management decisions, this dissertation sets them in the context of his brilliance as a student in college and later in graduate school where he absorbed the technocratic management techniques then developing at the Harvard Business School. He applied his education successfully in the Army Air Force during World War II and later at the Ford Motor Company. As Secretary of Defense he initiated a rigorous analytic approach to the defense budget and weapons acquisition through the Planning- Programming-Budgeting System (PPBS) he installed and the associated discipline of systems analysis that he brought to the department. Yet those innovations had the perverse effect of encouraging his proclivity to concentrate on managing data rather than managing people. Through costly errors such as the TFX plane controversy, McNamara discovered the limits ii of technocratic business procedures in a public service environment which required a politically sensitive and socially adept approach. McNamara disregarded many contemporary managerial techniques and models which emphasized delegation, flexibility, and informal communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming a Dove: Senator Claiborne Pell's Opposition to the Vietnam War
    Salve Regina University Digital Commons @ Salve Regina Master's Theses Salve's Dissertations and Theses 1994 Becoming a Dove: Senator Claiborne Pell's Opposition to the Vietnam War Kevin C. Klyberg University of Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/masters_theses Part of the American Politics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Klyberg, Kevin C., "Becoming a Dove: Senator Claiborne Pell's Opposition to the Vietnam War" (1994). Master's Theses. 3. https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/masters_theses/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Salve's Dissertations and Theses at Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BECOMING A DOVE: SENATOR CLAIBORNE PELL’S OPPOSITION TO THE VIETNAM WAR Kevin Christopher Klyberg B.A., College of Wooster, 1992 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts at The University of Connecticut 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS : INTRODUCTION iv Chapter 1: BECOMING A DIPLOMAT 1 Chapter 2: AN EMERGING DOVE 28 Chapter 3: RE-ELECTION AND REFLECTION 51 Chapter 4: OPPOSING NIXON 87 Chapter 5: ENDING THE WAR 115 BIBLIOGRAPHY 145 INTRODUCTION This study examines the opposition of Senator Claiborne de Borda Pell to the Vietnam War and his role as a member of the United States Senate’s anti-war movement. Pell’s speeches, Senate statements, and correspondence reveal his criticism of the Vietnam policies of Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon and his attempts to alter them.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics of Conscription in the United States
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Honors Theses Student Research 2008 Decisions to abrogate personal liberty: ethics of conscription in the United States Jacqueline Shuttleworth Grady Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses Part of the Political Science Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Grady, Jacqueline Shuttleworth, "Decisions to abrogate personal liberty: ethics of conscription in the United States" (2008). Honors Theses. Paper 104. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/104 This Honors Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. Decisions to Abrogate Personal Liberty The Ethics of Conscription in the United States Jacqueline Shuttleworth Grady Abstract The military draft in the United States has been a controversial public policy in the past. Conscription has been used for six different wars; each draft has differed from the others because of the circumstances of the war for which it was enacted and because of the way in which it was implemented. Today, because of the wars the United States is fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, a new public policy has developed, called stop loss. Stop loss affects only those people who have already served in the military, forcing them to remain in military service after the originally contracted date of their retirement.
    [Show full text]