DOCSLIB.ORG

L2/10-228: Proposal to Append One CJK Unified Ideograph to The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
L2/10-228: Proposal to Append One CJK Unified Ideograph to The JTC1/SC2/WG2 N3885 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 PROPOSAL SUMMARY FORM TO ACCOMPANY SUBMISSIONS 1 FOR ADDITIONS TO THE REPERTOIRE OF ISO/IEC 10646TP PT Please fill all the sections A, B and C below. Please read Principles and Procedures Document (P & P) from HTUhttp://www.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/principles.html UTH for guidelines and details before filling this form. Please ensure you are using the latest Form from HTUhttp://www.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/summaryform.htmlUTH. See also HTUhttp://www.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/roadmaps.html UTH for latest Roadmaps. A. Administrative 1. Title: Proposal to append one CJK Unified Ideograph to the URO 2. Requester's name: Joint US/UTC Contribution 3. Requester type (Member body/Liaison/Individual contribution): Member body 4. Submission date: 08/24/2010 5. Requester's reference (if applicable): See attached L2/10-228 6. Choose one of the following: This is a complete proposal: X (or) More information will be provided later: B. Technical – General 1. Choose one of the following: a. This proposal is for a new script (set of characters): Proposed name of script: b. The proposal is for addition of character(s) to an existing block: X Name of the existing block: CJK Unified Ideographs, Unified Repertoire & Ordering 2. Number of characters in proposal: 1 3. Proposed category (select one from below - see section 2.2 of P&P document): A-Contemporary X B.1-Specialized (small collection) B.2-Specialized (large collection) C-Major extinct D-Attested extinct E-Minor extinct F-Archaic Hieroglyphic or Ideographic G-Obscure or questionable usage symbols 4. Is a repertoire including character names provided? N/A a. If YES, are the names in accordance with the “character naming guidelines” in Annex L of P&P document? b. Are the character shapes attached in a legible form suitable for review? 5. Fonts related: a. Who will provide the appropriate computerized font to the Project Editor of 10646 for publishing the standard? Dr. Ken Lunde, Adobe Systems Incorporated, [email protected] b. Identify the party granting a license for use of the font by the editors (include address, e-mail, ftp-site, etc.): Dr. Ken Lunde, Adobe Systems Incorporated, [email protected] 6. References: a. Are references (to other character sets, dictionaries, descriptive texts etc.) provided? Yes b. Are published examples of use (such as samples from newspapers, magazines, or other sources) of proposed characters attached? Yes 7. Special encoding issues: Does the proposal address other aspects of character data processing (if applicable) such as input, presentation, sorting, searching, indexing, transliteration etc. (if yes please enclose information)? No 8. Additional Information: Submitters are invited to provide any additional information about Properties of the proposed Character(s) or Script that will assist in correct understanding of and correct linguistic processing of the proposed character(s) or script. Examples of such properties are: Casing information, Numeric information, Currency information, Display behaviour information such as line breaks, widths etc., Combining behaviour, Spacing behaviour, Directional behaviour, Default Collation behaviour, relevance in Mark Up contexts, Compatibility equivalence and other Unicode normalization related information. See the Unicode standard at HTUhttp://www.unicode.orgUTH for such information on other scripts. Also see HTUhttp://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UCD.htmlUTH and associated Unicode Technical Reports for information needed for consideration by the Unicode Technical Committee for inclusion in the Unicode Standard. 1 TP PT Form number: N3702-F (Original 1994-10-14; Revised 1995-01, 1995-04, 1996-04, 1996-08, 1999-03, 2001-05, 2001-09, 2003- 11, 2005-01, 2005-09, 2005-10, 2007-03, 2008-05, 2009-11) C. Technical - Justification 1. Has this proposal for addition of character(s) been submitted before? Yes If YES explain Originally submitted in IRG N1373 (IRG 29), and again in IRG N1677 (IRG 34) 2. Has contact been made to members of the user community (for example: National Body, user groups of the script or characters, other experts, etc.)? Yes If YES, with whom? IRG If YES, available relevant documents: IRG N1373, IRG N1496, IRG N1677, IRG N1700 3. Information on the user community for the proposed characters (for example: size, demographics, information technology use, or publishing use) is included? Yes Reference: For professional and commercial publishing use in Japan, and possibly Korea 4. The context of use for the proposed characters (type of use; common or rare) Rare Reference: Known variant form of U+6DBC 5. Are the proposed characters in current use by the user community? Yes If YES, where? Reference: Adobe-Japan1-6 CID+20156 6. After giving due considerations to the principles in the P&P document must the proposed characters be entirely in the BMP? Yes If YES, is a rationale provided? Yes If YES, reference: Given that it is a single character, there is precedence to append to URO 7. Should the proposed characters be kept together in a contiguous range (rather than being scattered)? N/A 8. Can any of the proposed characters be considered a presentation form of an existing character or character sequence? No If YES, is a rationale for its inclusion provided? If YES, reference: 9. Can any of the proposed characters be encoded using a composed character sequence of either existing characters or other proposed characters? No If YES, is a rationale for its inclusion provided? If YES, reference: 10. Can any of the proposed character(s) be considered to be similar (in appearance or function) to an existing character? Yes If YES, is a rationale for its inclusion provided? Yes If YES, reference: Although a variant form U+6DBC, the IRG decided to disunify 11. Does the proposal include use of combining characters and/or use of composite sequences? No If YES, is a rationale for such use provided? If YES, reference: Is a list of composite sequences and their corresponding glyph images (graphic symbols) provided? If YES, reference: 12. Does the proposal contain characters with any special properties such as control function or similar semantics? No If YES, describe in detail (include attachment if necessary) 13. Does the proposal contain any Ideographic compatibility character(s)? No If YES, is the equivalent corresponding unified ideographic character(s) identified? If YES, reference: L2/10-228R2 2010-06-30 (Revised 2010-08-09) Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set International Organization for Standardization Doc Type: Working Group Document Title: Proposal to append one CJK Unified Ideograph to the URO (revised) Source: Ken Lunde, Adobe Systems Incorporated Status: Corporate Full Member Contribution Action: For consideration by the UTC Date: 2010-08-09 (originally submitted on 2010-06-30) Background Twenty-one Adobe-Japan1-6 kanji were submitted to the IRG in the document IRG N1373 (during IRG 29), and additional evidence was provide in the document IRG N1496 (during IRG 31). These kanji became part of the UNC (Urgently Needed Characters) set, which eventually became the 222 characters that now form Extension D. Of these twenty-one characters, nineteen are now included in Extension D. The two remaining characters were effectively in limbo, because no unification decision was made by the IRG until recently. A decision was made at IRG 34 with regard to these two ideographs, by discussing the document IRG N1677. One of the ideographs, 工, was unified with 工 (U+5DE5). See the document IRG N1701 for details. The other ideograph, 凉 (Adobe- Japan1-6 CID+20156), was determined to be disunified from its related form, 涼 (U+6DBC). See the document IRG N1700 for details. Unfortunately, Extension E was closed at the end of IRG 33, so it was not possible to add this ideograph during IRG 34. In addition, Extension F has not yet started. The IRG documents N1373 (see page 8 for CID+20156 evidences), N1496 (see page 2 for CID+20156 evidences, as UNC #111), N1677 (see page 2 for CID+20156 evidences), and N1700 (see Section 3 for the IRG’s decision to encode CID+20156) are attached. Proposal Details The proposal is simple. This ideograph, 凉 (Adobe-Japan1-6 CID+20156), was once included in the UNC set, because it was an urgently-neeeded character, so Adobe Systems requests that it be appended to the URO at the earliest possible op- portunity, as was done for 38 ideographs thus far (22 in Unicode 4.1, eight in Unicode 5.1, and eight in Unicode 5.2). I sug- gest using U+9FCC as its code point. The “urgency” now stems from this being the only Adobe-Japan1-6 ideograph that does not have a “plain text” representation, either by being directly encoded or having a registered or soon-to-be-registered “Adobe-Japan1” IVS. The IRG has already ruled on this ideograph as recorded in the document IRG N1700. The IRG determined that it is a new CJK Unified Ideograph, and explicitly ruled that it should not be unified with U+6DBC. 1 2007-11-05 Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set International Organization for Standardization Doc Type: Working Group Document Title: Twenty-one kanji to be considered for unification Source: Ken Lunde, Adobe Systems Incorporated Status: Individual Contribution Action: For consideration by IRG Date: 2007-11-05 Background The twenty-one Adobe-Japan1-6 kanji in this document represent those characters that we feel cannot be unified with exist- ing CJK Unified Ideographs, either because their forms make it obvious that unification is not possible, or it is not obvious whether unification is possible. What is being requested of the IRG is simply a per-character ruling as to whether these twenty-one Adobe-Japan1-6 kanji fall within the scope of unification.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download the Specification
    Internationalizing and Localizing Applications in Oracle Solaris Part No: E61053 November 2020 Internationalizing and Localizing Applications in Oracle Solaris Part No: E61053 Copyright © 2014, 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates. License Restrictions Warranty/Consequential Damages Disclaimer This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. Warranty Disclaimer The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. Restricted Rights Notice If this is software or related documentation that is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs (including any operating system, integrated software, any programs embedded, installed or activated on delivered hardware, and modifications of such programs) and Oracle computer documentation or other Oracle data delivered to or accessed by U.S. Government end users are "commercial
    [Show full text]
  • Writing As Aesthetic in Modern and Contemporary Japanese-Language Literature
    At the Intersection of Script and Literature: Writing as Aesthetic in Modern and Contemporary Japanese-language Literature Christopher J Lowy A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2021 Reading Committee: Edward Mack, Chair Davinder Bhowmik Zev Handel Jeffrey Todd Knight Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Asian Languages and Literature ©Copyright 2021 Christopher J Lowy University of Washington Abstract At the Intersection of Script and Literature: Writing as Aesthetic in Modern and Contemporary Japanese-language Literature Christopher J Lowy Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Edward Mack Department of Asian Languages and Literature This dissertation examines the dynamic relationship between written language and literary fiction in modern and contemporary Japanese-language literature. I analyze how script and narration come together to function as a site of expression, and how they connect to questions of visuality, textuality, and materiality. Informed by work from the field of textual humanities, my project brings together new philological approaches to visual aspects of text in literature written in the Japanese script. Because research in English on the visual textuality of Japanese-language literature is scant, my work serves as a fundamental first-step in creating a new area of critical interest by establishing key terms and a general theoretical framework from which to approach the topic. Chapter One establishes the scope of my project and the vocabulary necessary for an analysis of script relative to narrative content; Chapter Two looks at one author’s relationship with written language; and Chapters Three and Four apply the concepts explored in Chapter One to a variety of modern and contemporary literary texts where script plays a central role.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacy Character Sets & Encodings
    Legacy & Not-So-Legacy Character Sets & Encodings Ken Lunde CJKV Type Development Adobe Systems Incorporated bc ftp://ftp.oreilly.com/pub/examples/nutshell/cjkv/unicode/iuc15-tb1-slides.pdf Tutorial Overview dc • What is a character set? What is an encoding? • How are character sets and encodings different? • Legacy character sets. • Non-legacy character sets. • Legacy encodings. • How does Unicode fit it? • Code conversion issues. • Disclaimer: The focus of this tutorial is primarily on Asian (CJKV) issues, which tend to be complex from a character set and encoding standpoint. 15th International Unicode Conference Copyright © 1999 Adobe Systems Incorporated Terminology & Abbreviations dc • GB (China) — Stands for “Guo Biao” (国标 guóbiâo ). — Short for “Guojia Biaozhun” (国家标准 guójiâ biâozhün). — Means “National Standard.” • GB/T (China) — “T” stands for “Tui” (推 tuî ). — Short for “Tuijian” (推荐 tuîjiàn ). — “T” means “Recommended.” • CNS (Taiwan) — 中國國家標準 ( zhôngguó guójiâ biâozhün) in Chinese. — Abbreviation for “Chinese National Standard.” 15th International Unicode Conference Copyright © 1999 Adobe Systems Incorporated Terminology & Abbreviations (Cont’d) dc • GCCS (Hong Kong) — Abbreviation for “Government Chinese Character Set.” • JIS (Japan) — 日本工業規格 ( nihon kôgyô kikaku) in Japanese. — Abbreviation for “Japanese Industrial Standard.” — 〄 • KS (Korea) — 한국 공업 규격 (韓國工業規格 hangug gongeob gyugyeog) in Korean. — Abbreviation for “Korean Standard.” — ㉿ — Designation change from “C” to “X” on August 20, 1997. 15th International Unicode Conference Copyright © 1999 Adobe Systems Incorporated Terminology & Abbreviations (Cont’d) dc • TCVN (Vietnam) — Tiu Chun Vit Nam in Vietnamese. — Means “Vietnamese Standard.” • CJKV — Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese. 15th International Unicode Conference Copyright © 1999 Adobe Systems Incorporated What Is A Character Set? dc • A collection of characters that are intended to be used together to create meaningful text.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Ng Systems Librarian the Chinese University of Hong Kong Library Agenda
    Enhancing Chinese character normalization in Primo with the HKIUG TSVCC mapping table Alan Ng Systems Librarian The Chinese University of Hong Kong Library Agenda ❖ Primo out-of-box character normalization ❖ Background on CJK normalization ❖ HKIUG TSVCC mapping table ❖ Implementing TSVCC on Primo About CUHK Library ❖ established in 1963 ❖ 7 branches ❖ 200 staff ❖ 260K current patrons ❖ 130K journal subscriptions, 4.5M ebooks, 2.5M printed volumes ❖ special collections includes from oracles bones, Chinese rare books, modern Chinese literary archives … character normalization ❖ different people type differently ❖ normal to expect “Apple” will have the exact results from “aPPLE”, “ApPle”, “appLE” … ❖ before indexing, Primo will first “clean up” (normalize) the data to its lower case (e.g. A —> a, B —> b …) ❖ Primo FE will do the same for the search term typed by users, to get a match with the index Primo out-of-box normalizations ❖ Primo provides OTB normalizations for different languages at: ❖ /exlibris/primo/p4_1/ng/jaguar/home/profile/ analysis/specialCharacters/CharConversion/OTB/ OTB ❖ e.g. ❖ latin languages (non_cjk_unicode_normalization.txt) ❖ CJK (cjk_unicode_trad_to_simp_normalization.txt) OTB CJK normalization table ❖ 2700+ entries ❖ mainly for mapping Traditional Chinese into its Simplified form ❖ assume it is a 1:1 mapping, Simplified Chinese being the “lowercase” like the English language ❖ But in fact, Simplified Chinese is only one kind of variant form for Chinese character ❖ other variant forms (ideograph) of the same character need to be cover as well extract of the OTB table background on CJK ❖ Traditional Chinese characters have been used since as early as 2nd centuryBC (Han Dynasty, 漢朝) ❖ used by people in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau ❖ Simplified Chinese characters were introduced by PRC government during 1950’s ❖ used by people in PRC, SE Asia countries e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Extension of VHDL to Support Multiple-Byte Characters
    Extension of VHDL to support multiple-byte characters Kiyoshi Makino Masamichi Kawarabayashi Seiko Instruments Inc. NEC Corporation 6-41-6 Kameido, Koto-ku 1753 Shimonumabe, Nakahara-ku Tokyo 136-8512 Japan Kawasaki, Kanagawa 211-8666 Japan [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Written Japanese is comprised of many kinds of characters. Whereas one-byte is sufficient for the Roman alphabet, two-byte are required to support written Japanese. It should be noted that written Chinese require three-byte. The scope of this paper is not restricted to written Japanese because we should consider the implementation of the standard which covers the major languages using the multiple-byte characters. Currently, VHDL does not support multiple-byte characters. This has proven to be a major impediment to the productivity for electronics designers in Japan, and possibly in other Asian countries. In this paper, we briefly describe the problem, give a short background of the character set required to support Japanese and other multiple-byte characters language, and propose a required change in the IEEE Std 1076. 1. Introduction VHDL[1] have recently become very popular to design the logical circuits all over the world. We, the Electronic Industries Association of Japan (EIAJ), have been working for the standardization activities with the Design Automation Sub-Committee (DASC) in IEEE. In the meanwhile, the VHDL and other related standards have evolved and improved. As the number of designers using VHDL increases so does the need to support the local language though designers have asked EDA tool vendors to enhance their products to support local language, it have often been rejected unfortunately.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 18.1, Han
    The Unicode® Standard Version 13.0 – Core Specification To learn about the latest version of the Unicode Standard, see http://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trade- mark claim, the designations have been printed with initial capital letters or in all capitals. Unicode and the Unicode Logo are registered trademarks of Unicode, Inc., in the United States and other countries. The authors and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this specification, but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the information or programs contained herein. The Unicode Character Database and other files are provided as-is by Unicode, Inc. No claims are made as to fitness for any particular purpose. No warranties of any kind are expressed or implied. The recipient agrees to determine applicability of information provided. © 2020 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. This publication is protected by copyright, and permission must be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction. For information regarding permissions, inquire at http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html. For information about the Unicode terms of use, please see http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html. The Unicode Standard / the Unicode Consortium; edited by the Unicode Consortium. — Version 13.0. Includes index. ISBN 978-1-936213-26-9 (http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode13.0.0/) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Cross-Locale CJKV Code Conversion
    Implementing Cross-locale CJKV Code Conversion Ken Lunde, Adobe Systems Incorporated [email protected] http://www.oreilly.com/~lunde/ 1. Introduction Most operating systems today deal with single locales. Within a single CJKV locale, different operating sys- tems often use different encodings for the same character set. Consider Shift-JIS and EUC-JP encodings for Japanese—Shift-JIS is historically used on MacOS and Windows, but EUC-JP is used on Unix. This makes code conversion a necessity. Code conversion within a single locale is, by and large, a trivial operation that typically involves a mathematical algorithm. In the past, a lot of code conversion was performed by users through dedicated software tools. Many of today’s applications include built-in code conversion routines, but these routines deal with only multiple encodings of a single locale (such as EUC-KR, ISO-2022-KR, Johab, and Unified hangul Code encodings for Korean). Code conversion across CJKV locales, such as between Chinese and Japanese, is more problematic. While Unicode serves as an excellent basis for implementing cross-locale code conversion, there are still problems to be addressed, such as unmappable characters. 2. Code Conversion Basics Converting between different encodings of a single locale, which represents a trivial effort that involves well- established code conversion algorithms (or mapping tables), is a well-understood process these days. How- ever, as soon as code conversion extends beyond a single locale, there are additional complexities that arise, such as the following: • Code conversion algorithms almost always must be replaced by mapping tables because the ordering of characters in different CJKV character sets are different.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Montana Commencement Program, 1975
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana University of Montana Commencement Programs, 1898-2020 Office of the Registrar 6-15-1975 University of Montana Commencement Program, 1975 University of Montana (Missoula, Mont. : 1965-1994). Office of the Registrar Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/um_commencement_programs Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation University of Montana (Missoula, Mont. : 1965-1994). Office of the Registrar, "University of Montana Commencement Program, 1975" (1975). University of Montana Commencement Programs, 1898-2020. 78. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/um_commencement_programs/78 This Program is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of the Registrar at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Montana Commencement Programs, 1898-2020 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SEVENTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL COMMENCEMENT UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA MISSOULA SUNDAY, JUNE THE FIFTEENTH NINETEEN HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FIVE FIELD HOUSE AUDITORIUM THE MARSHALS James H. Lowe Chairman, Faculty Senate Associate Professor of Forestry Walter L. Brown R. Keith Osterheld Professor o f English Professor of Chemistry ORDER OF EXERCISES PROCESSIONAL BRASS ENSEMBLE AND ORGAN Lance Boyd, Director John Ellis, Organ PROCESSION Marshals, the Colors, Candidates for Degrees, the Faculty, Members of the Governing Boards, Guests of Honor, the President PRESENTATION OF COLORS NATIONAL ANTHEM The Star Spangled Banner O, say! can you see by the dawn’s early light, What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming, Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous flight O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming? And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air, Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.
    [Show full text]
  • L2/18-279 & IRG N2334 (Proposal to Define New Unihan Database Property: Kiicore2020)
    ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2/IRG N2334 L2/18-279 Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set International Organization for Standardization Doc Type: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2/IRG Title: Proposal to define new Unihan Database property: kIICore2020 Source: Ken Lunde (Adobe) Status: Individual Contribution Action: For consideration by the UTC & IRG Date: 2018-09-03 (see L2/18-066, L2/18-066R & L2/18-066R2) Per the documents listed directly above in parentheses, two of which are subsequent revisions of the first document, I previously proposed what I considered to be modest changes to the existing kIICore property, mainly to address some shortcomings that were identified in a series of five CJK Type Blog articles. Given the reluctance on the part of some national bodies to accept such modest changes, I decided to instead propose a completely new Unihan Database property that releases the set from being hampered by memory constraints that may have been applicable 15 years ago, but which arguably no longer apply to modern environments. The proposed property name is kIICore2020, which includes as part of its name the year in which the first version of Unicode that could include this new property is released, specifically Version 13.0. The attached iicore2020-data.txt data file provides all of the property data as proposed in this document, and covers 20,625 CJK Unified Ideographs and 69 CJK Compatibility Ideographs. The seven sections that follow describe the scope of each of the seven supported source tags, which are the same as those used by the existing kIICore property.
    [Show full text]
  • Unicode in XML and Other Markup Languages
    [ contents ] This document is an editor's copy. It supports markup to identify changes from a previous version. Two kinds of changes are highlighted: new, added text, and deleted text. Unicode Technical Report #20 W3C Working Group Note (Editor's Draft) 12 October 2012 This version: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr20/tr20-9.html http://www.w3.org/International/docs/unicode-xml/ Latest version: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr20/ http://www.w3.org/TR/unicode-xml/ Previous version: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr20/tr20-8.html http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-unicode-xml-20070516/ Date (Unicode): 2012-10-12 Revision (Unicode): 9 Authors: Martin Dürst ([email protected]) Asmus Freytag ([email protected]) Editor: Richard Ishida, W3C Copyright © 2012 Unicode®, and W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. Detailed copyright information is available. Abstract This document contains guidelines on the use of the Unicode Standard in conjunction with markup languages such as XML. Status of This Document (common) This is a proposed update to a Technical Report published jointly by the Unicode Technical Committee and by the W3C Internationalization Working Group/Interest Group (W3C Members only) in the context of the W3C Internationalization Activity. This is a draft document which may be updated, replaced, or superseded by other documents at any time. This is not a stable document; it is inappropriate to cite this document as other than a work in progress. The base version of the Unicode Standard for this document is Version 56.2. For more information about versions of the Unicode Standard, see http://www.unicode.org/standard/versions/.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Code Charts 24
    The Unicode® Standard Version 13.0 – Core Specification To learn about the latest version of the Unicode Standard, see http://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trade- mark claim, the designations have been printed with initial capital letters or in all capitals. Unicode and the Unicode Logo are registered trademarks of Unicode, Inc., in the United States and other countries. The authors and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this specification, but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the information or programs contained herein. The Unicode Character Database and other files are provided as-is by Unicode, Inc. No claims are made as to fitness for any particular purpose. No warranties of any kind are expressed or implied. The recipient agrees to determine applicability of information provided. © 2020 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. This publication is protected by copyright, and permission must be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction. For information regarding permissions, inquire at http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html. For information about the Unicode terms of use, please see http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html. The Unicode Standard / the Unicode Consortium; edited by the Unicode Consortium. — Version 13.0. Includes index. ISBN 978-1-936213-26-9 (http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode13.0.0/) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Establish a CJK Unified Ideographs “Urgently Needed Characters” Process (Revised) Authors: Dr
    ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 Nxxxx L2/11-442R Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set International Organization for Standardization Doc Type: Working Group Document Title: Proposal to establish a CJK Unified Ideographs “Urgently Needed Characters” process (revised) Authors: Dr. Ken Lunde (小林釰) & John Jenkins (井作恆) Source: The Unicode Consortium Status: Liason Contribution Action: For consideration by JTC1/SC2/WG2 Date: 2012-02-07 (originally submitted on 2011-11-17) Background The process of standardizing repertoires of CJK Unified Ideographs is long and cumbersome, and is almost always measured in years. This is primarily because the typical CJK Unified Ideograph repertoire includes thousands or tens of thousands of characters, and thus requires several rounds of review and discussion before it can be stan- dardized. Extension E, for example, began as Extension D, whose national body submissions were accepted in early 2007, and included characters that were deferred from Extension C. Extension E is currently at the final stages of standardization. To address this particular process shortcoming, the IRG established a one-time UNC (Urgently Needed Characters) repertoire as one of the IRG 29 Resolutions (see IRG N1377, specifically Resolution IRG M29.5), which eventually became CJK Unified Ideographs Extension D, with 222 CJK Unified Ideographs (U+2B740 through U+2B81D), and which was subsequently included in Unicode Version 6.0. Without a formalized UNC-like process in place, which would serve as a parallel pipeline for smaller repertoires of urgently-needed CJK Unified Ideographs, it is extraordinarily difficult for national bodies to standardize smaller sets of urgently-needed CJK Unified Ideographs in a timely manner.
    [Show full text]