DOCSLIB.ORG

Read the Full PDF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Read the Full PDF Safety, Liberty, and Islamist Terrorism American and European Approaches to Domestic Counterterrorism Gary J. Schmitt, Editor The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 15200 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214. To order call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 or call 1-800-862-5801. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schmitt, Gary James, 1952– Safety, liberty, and Islamist terrorism : American and European approaches to domestic counterterrorism / Gary J. Schmitt. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8447-4333-2 (cloth) ISBN-10: 0-8447-4333-X (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-8447-4349-3 (pbk.) ISBN-10: 0-8447-4349-6 (pbk.) [etc.] 1. United States—Foreign relations—Europe. 2. Europe—Foreign relations— United States. 3. National security—International cooperation. 4. Security, International. I. Title. JZ1480.A54S38 2010 363.325'16094—dc22 2010018324 13 12 11 10 09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cover photographs: Double Decker Bus © Stockbyte/Getty Images; Freight Yard © Chris Jongkind/ Getty Images; Manhattan Skyline © Alessandro Busà/ Flickr/Getty Images; and New York, NY, September 13, 2001—The sun streams through the dust cloud over the wreckage of the World Trade Center. Photo © Andrea Booher/ FEMA Photo News © 2010 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Wash- ington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or repro- duced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not neces- sarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. Printed in the United States of America Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii INTRODUCTION, Gary J. Schmitt 1 1. UNITED KINGDOM: ONCE MORE UNTO THE BREACH, Tom Parker 8 Northern Ireland 9 A Period of Transition 13 9/11 and Its Aftermath 19 7/7 and Its Aftermath 21 More Resources, More Coordination 24 Londonistan and Liaison Partners 26 Conclusion 29 2. FRANCE: IN A LEAGUE OF ITS OWN, Gary J. Schmitt 31 The French System 32 Changes Since 2001 42 Conclusion 45 3. SPAIN: FROM 9/11 TO 3/11 AND BEYOND, Rafael L. Bardají and Ignacio Cosidó 48 Policing the Threat 50 Policing the Threat after 3/11/04 53 The European Framework 56 The Threat Today 58 Conclusion 60 4. GERMANY: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD, Eric Gujer 62 Germany’s Islamist Threat 64 German Idealism and the War on Terror 68 New Measures and Old Impediments 70 v vi SAFETY, LIBERTY, AND ISLAMIST TERRORISM Germany’s Divided House 75 Conclusion 80 5. UNITED STATES: FACING THE THREAT AT HOME, Gary J. Schmitt 81 U.S. Counterterrorism before 9/11 81 After 9/11: New Laws, Old Laws, and Old Laws Implemented in New Ways 87 New Structures, New Guidelines 92 Some Concluding Points and Questions 97 6. U.S. COUNTERTERRORISM IN PERSPECTIVE, Gary J. Schmitt 105 The Energetic Executive 107 The European Experience 110 Comparing and Contrasting 114 Conclusion 121 NOTES 127 INDEX 179 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 193 Acknowledgments This book owes its origins to long and fruitful conversations with Reuel Marc Gerecht, my former AEI colleague. Much of the initial spadework for the vol- ume was a joint effort. In particular, the chapter on France owes much to Reuel’s insights into French security politics. I would also like to thank Abram Shulsky of the Hudson Institute and John Yoo of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law for taking the time and effort to read the manuscript and provide me with their thoughts and suggestions. In addi- tion, I would like to thank the numerous government officials, scholars, and policymakers from Spain, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom who agreed to share their thoughts on their countries’ respective security prac- tices and policies. Allied relations have gone through a particularly rough patch since the Iraq War, but cooperation in the field of intelligence and counterterrorism remains a solid cornerstone of transatlantic ties. Finally, I would like to thank Philipp Tomio, my research assistant, for seeing this project through and providing invaluable research help. Gary J. Schmitt, May 20, 2010 vii Introduction Gary J. Schmitt This volume owes its genesis to several long discussions with a former AEI colleague, Reuel Gerecht. Gerecht, a Middle East scholar and former opera- tions officer with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), had lived in Europe for extended periods and had worked Middle East “targets” for much of that time. I, on the other hand, was trained as a scholar in presidential studies and worked in both Congress and the White House in senior positions over- seeing the U.S. intelligence community. What struck us both in the wake of the attacks on 9/11 was the general failure to put recommended changes to our domestic counterterrorist efforts into proper historical and comparative perspective. It was as though the United States had never in the past dealt with a security threat on its own soil, or democratic allies had not faced or were not facing similar problems from jihadist terrorists. This observation led us to publish an initial paper that looked at France’s success in meeting its own Middle East terrorist problem and at the possible “lessons learned” for the United States.1 It also led us to think that a broader set of country studies might be useful; hence, this volume, with chapters on France, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Germany, as well as a chapter detailing the U.S. counterterrorism regime. These individual country stud- ies describe the nuts and bolts of current domestic security laws, institu- tions, and practices and place those elements in the unique political and historical context of each nation. Each country study also looks at what changes have been made since the attacks of 9/11 and, in the case of the European allies, what changes have followed the bombings in Madrid (March 11, 2004) and London (July 7, 2005). The final chapter draws 1 2 SAFETY, LIBERTY, AND ISLAMIST TERRORISM together these earlier analyses and considers what broader points can be drawn from comparing the counterterrorism practices of the United States with those of other democratic states, while at the same time considering the changes in U.S. laws and practices since 9/11 within the broader sweep of American history. All too often, the debate in the United States over its post-9/11 policies looks only at U.S. policies and practices, and through the lens of the past three decades. Although stated in different forms, the underlying question derived from this narrowed perspective is whether we have moved too quickly and too aggressively to undo the regulations put in place to keep the American intelligence community under greater control in the wake of the investigations of the mid-1970s into intelligence practices—or, less often, whether we have not moved quickly and decisively enough. Not only does this time-constrained focus do little justice to our own history of dealing with serious domestic security issues, but it ignores the efforts by long-time allies—all of whom have had to deal with serious terrorist challenges in the recent past—to find the proper balance between safety and liberty. If noth- ing else, being clear about the lines being drawn by other liberal democra- cies between, say, the right to privacy and the need for surveillance, between law enforcement and intelligence gathering, and between free speech and incitement, makes for a more meaningful and more useful debate here in the United States. The time is right for such a debate, given the change in the U.S. admin- istration. Certainly, as a candidate and senator, Barack Obama promised to rethink the Bush administration’s policies on the “global war on terror,” which he described as “dangerously flawed” and as “undermin[ing] the very values we are fighting to defend.”2 As president, he has pointedly charac- terized the previous administration’s decisions as “hasty,” “based on fear rather than foresight,” and he has criticized its “ad hoc legal approach . that was neither effective nor sustainable.”3 Few were surprised then when the new administration moved swiftly and dramatically to distance itself from the policies of the previous White House: on his third day in office, the president issued executive orders to close the detention facilities at Guantá- namo Bay, renounced the use of torture, and shut down the CIA’s network of secret detention facilities.4 And while controversial, other decisions by the administration are hardly surprising either, given candidate Obama’s INTRODUCTION 3 rhetoric about Bush administration policies: for instance, the decision to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, along with four other detainees associated with the attacks on 9/11, in a federal court rather than before a military tribunal, and to treat the case of would-be Christmas bomber Umar Farouk Abdul- mutallab as a criminal matter rather than one involving an unlawful enemy combatant. These changes in policies are significant—if for no other reason than the signal they are designed to send abroad: that the Obama adminis- tration will rebalance America’s approach to the jihadist threat to be more in line with what allied, especially European, publics believe should be a less warlike, more law-bound approach to counterterrorism.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prisoners of Geography Is a Concise and Useful Primer on Geopolitics.’
    ‘Marshall is not afraid to ask tough questions and provide sharp answers … His approach is simple but eective. Ten chapters, each accompanied by a map, cover the world’s regions and global powers. Each shows how geography shapes not just history but destiny. In an ever more complex, chaotic and interlinked world, Prisoners of Geography is a concise and useful primer on geopolitics.’ – Adam LeBor, Newsweek ‘Sharp insights into the way geography shapes the choices of world leaders.’ – Gideon Rachman, The World blog, ft.com ‘An exceptional work, well-researched, argued and documented … a treasure of information to satisfy the specialist researcher into contemporary geopolitics and oers a riveting insight to the general reader or student.… It is all covered in this magnicent book, which I highly recommend.’ – Nehad Ismail, writer and broadcaster ‘There are few foreign correspondents in the current British media who can present an overview of a political situation quite like Tim Marshall … in Prisoners of Geography he presents this knowledge and experience quite brilliantly. It’s a cleverly written book and underlines what makes Tim Marshall such an eective voice on world aairs.’ – retroculturati.com ‘Marshall’s latest book explains how politics is nothing without geography, in his crisp and compelling style … What he really excels at is capturing the psychology of nations and giving maps a power that politicians must tame.’ – Top Ten Holiday Reads, Dan Lewis, Stanfords, WorldTravelGuide.net ‘Quite simply, one of the best books about geopolitics
    [Show full text]
  • In Their Own Words: Voices of Jihad
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as CHILD POLICY a public service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and PUBLIC SAFETY effective solutions that address the challenges facing SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY the public and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Support RAND TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Purchase this document WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Learn more about the RAND Corporation View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. in their own words Voices of Jihad compilation and commentary David Aaron Approved for public release; distribution unlimited C O R P O R A T I O N This book results from the RAND Corporation's continuing program of self-initiated research.
    [Show full text]
  • (2008): Perspectives on Terrorism
    Table of Contents: Accounting For the Waves of International Terrorism ………….…...3 By Dipak K. Gupta Interpreting the PKK’s Signals in Europe…………………………...10 By Vera Eccarius-Kelly Review Essay: Top 50 Books on Terrorism and Counterterrorism…15 By Joshua Sinai PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume II, Issue 11 Accounting For the Waves of International Terrorism By Dipak K. Gupta “Without the pen of Pain, the swords of Washington would have been wielded in vain.” - John Adams dvancements in sciences come through painstaking observations. Scientists’ astute observations of the seemingly chaotic world pave the way for what is known as “knowledge creep.” Terrorism research is certainly no exception to this rule. One of David Rapoport’s singular contributions to A our advancement of knowledge has been his articulation of the four waves of international terror- ism. Rapoport (2006:10) defines waves with three characteristics: a) a cycle of activities characterized by ex- pansion and contraction phases, b) covering multiple nations, and c) “driven by a common predominant energy that shapes the participating groups’ characteristics and mutual relationships.” By studying the history of ter- rorism since the 1880s, Professor Rapoport identifies four distinct waves fueled by common ideological fervor emanating from anarchism, anti-colonialism, socialism, and religious fundamentalism, respectively, with the first three waves lasting roughly 40 years each. Although the “wave” theory has gained a firm footing in the extant literature on terrorism (Sageman 2008a), to my knowledge, not much effort has gone into the examination of the causes of, and the process by which mega ideas saturate nearly every corner of the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    NOTES Introduction 1. Robert Kagan to George Packer. Cited in Packer’s The Assassin’s Gate: America In Iraq (Faber and Faber, London, 2006): 38. 2. Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neoconservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004): 9. 3. Critiques of the war on terror and its origins include Gary Dorrien, Imperial Designs: Neoconservatism and the New Pax Americana (Routledge, New York and London, 2004); Francis Fukuyama, After the Neocons: America At the Crossroads (Profile Books, London, 2006); Ira Chernus, Monsters to Destroy: The Neoconservative War on Terror and Sin (Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, CO and London, 2006); and Jacob Heilbrunn, They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons (Doubleday, New York, 2008). 4. A report of the PNAC, Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, September 2000: 76. URL: http:// www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf (15 January 2009). 5. On the first generation on Cold War neoconservatives, which has been covered far more extensively than the second, see Gary Dorrien, The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture and the War of Ideology (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1993); Peter Steinfels, The Neoconservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America’s Politics (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1979); Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005); Murray Friedman ed. Commentary in American Life (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 2005); Mark Gerson, The Neoconservative Vision: From the Cold War to the Culture Wars (Madison Books, Lanham MD; New York; Oxford, 1997); and Maria Ryan, “Neoconservative Intellectuals and the Limitations of Governing: The Reagan Administration and the Demise of the Cold War,” Comparative American Studies, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States and Democracy Promotion in Iraq and Lebanon in the Aftermath of the Events of 9/11 and the 2003 Iraq War
    The United States and democracy promotion in Iraq and Lebanon in the aftermath of the events of 9/11 and the 2003 Iraq War A Thesis Submitted to the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of PhD. in Political Science. By Abess Taqi Ph.D. candidate, University of London Internal Supervisors Dr. James Chiriyankandath (Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London) Professor Philip Murphy (Director, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London) External Co-Supervisor Dr. Maria Holt (Reader in Politics, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Westminster) © Copyright Abess Taqi April 2015. All rights reserved. 1 | P a g e DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work and effort and that it has not been submitted anywhere for any award. Where other sources of information have been used, they have been duly acknowledged. Signature: ………………………………………. Date: ……………………………………………. 2 | P a g e Abstract This thesis features two case studies exploring the George W. Bush Administration’s (2001 – 2009) efforts to promote democracy in the Arab world, following military occupation in Iraq, and through ‘democracy support’ or ‘democracy assistance’ in Lebanon. While reviewing well rehearsed arguments that emphasise the inappropriateness of the methods employed to promote Western liberal democracy in Middle East countries and the difficulties in the way of democracy being fostered by foreign powers, it focuses on two factors that also contributed to derailing the U.S.’s plans to introduce ‘Western style’ liberal democracy to Iraq and Lebanon.
    [Show full text]
  • TO: Usama Bin Ladin FROM: Abu Musab Al-Suri [Mustafa Setmariam
    TO: Usama bin Ladin FROM: Abu Musab al-Suri [Mustafa Setmariam Nasar] and Abu Khalid al-Suri [Muhammad al-Bahaya] VIA: Ayman al-Zawahiri FOLDER: Incoming Mail—From Afghanistan DATE: July 19, 1999 Noble brother Abu Abdullah [Bin Ladin], Peace upon you, and God’s mercy and blessings. This message [concerns] the problem between you and al-Amir al-Mu’mineen [the Commander of the Faithful, i.e. Taliban leader Muhammad Umar] … The results of this crisis can be felt even here in Kabul and other places. Talk about closing down the camps has spread. Discontent with the Arabs has become clear. Whispers between the Taliban with some of our non-Arab brothers has become customary. In short, our brother Abu Abdullah’s latest troublemaking with the Taliban and the Commander of the Faithful jeopardizes the Arabs, and the Arab presence, today in all of Afghanistan, for no good reason. It provides a ripe opportunity for all adversaries, including America, the West, the Jews, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, the Mas’ud-Dostum [Northern] Alliance, etc., to serve the Arabs a blow that could end up causing their most faithful allies to kick them out … Our brother [Bin Ladin] will help our enemies reach their goal free of charge! … The strangest thing I have heard so far is Abu Abdullah’s saying that he wouldn’t listen to the Commander of the Faithful when he asked him to stop giving interviews … I think our brother [Bin Ladin] has caught the disease of screens, flashes, fans, and applause … The only solution out of this dilemma is what a number of knowledgeable and experienced people have agreed upon … Abu Abdullah should go to the Commander of the Faithful with some of his brothers and tell them that … the Commander of the Faithful was right when he asked you to refrain from interviews, announcements, and media encounters, and that you will help the Taliban as much as you can in their battle, until they achieve control over Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Clear Spring Health HMO Plan Provider Directory
    Clear Spring Health HMO Plan Provider Directory This directory is current as of December 1, 2019. This directory provides a list of Clear Spring Health’s current network providers. This directory is for the Illinois Service Area: Boone, Clinton, Cook, Du Page, Kane, Kankakee, La Salle, Macoupin, Madison, Mc Henry, Ogle, St. Clair, Stephenson, Will and Winnebago county. To access Clear Spring Health’s online provider directory, you can visit www.clearspringhealthcare.com. For any questions about the information contained in this directory, please call our Member Service Department at 877-384-1241, we are open 8:00 am to 8:00 pm Md on ay – Friday from April 1 – September 30 and 8:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday – Sunday from October 1 – March 31. TTY users should call 711. Out-of-network/non-contracted providers are under no obligation to treat Clear Spring Health members, except in emergency situations. Please call our Member Service number or see your Evidence of Coverage for more information, including the cost-sharing that applies to out-of- network services. Our plan has people and free interpreter services available to answer questions from disabled and non-English speaking members. We can also give you information in Braille, in large print, or other alternate formats at no cost if you need it. We are required to give you information about the plan’s benefits in a format that is accessible and appropriate for you. To get information from us in a way that works for you, please call Member Services or contact Office for Civil Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Al-Qaeda: the Many Faces of an Islamist Extremist Threat
    a al-Qaeda: The Many Faces of an Islamist Extremist Threat REPORT OF THE HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ISBN 0-16-076897-7 90000 9 780160 768972 al-QaedaTh e Many Faces of an Islamist Extremist Th reat REPORT OF THE HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE JUNE 2006 109th Congress Union Calendar No. 355 2d Session Report 109-615 al-Qaeda: The Many Faces of an Islamist Extremist Threat ___________________ REPORT OF THE U.S. HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE APPROVED: JUNE 2006 TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS SUBMITTED: SEPTEMBER 2006 Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/congress/house http://intelligence.house.gov/ September 6, 2006.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE Keeping America Informed I www.gpo.gov WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Offi ce Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ISBN 0-16-076897-7 i PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PETER HOEKSTRA, MICHIGAN, CHAIRMAN RAY LAHOOD, ILLINOIS JANE HARMAN, CALIFORNIA TERRY EVERETT, ALABAMA ALCEE L. HASTINGS, FLORIDA ELTON GALLEGLY, CALIFORNIA SILVESTRE REYES, TEXAS HEATHER WILSON, NEW MEXICO LEONARD L. BOSWELL, IOWA JO ANN DAVIS, VIRGINIA ROBERT E. (BUD) CRAMER, JR., ALABAMA MAC THORNBERRY, TEXAS ANNA G. ESHOO, CALIFORNIA JOHN M. MCHUGH, NEW YORK RUSH D. HOLT, NEW JERSEY TODD TIAHRT, KANSAS C.
    [Show full text]
  • Dziadok Mikalai 1'St Year Student
    EUROPEAN HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY Program «World Politics and economics» Dziadok Mikalai 1'st year student Essay Written assignment Course «International relations and governances» Course instructor Andrey Stiapanau Vilnius, 2016 The Troubles (Northern Ireland conflict 1969-1998) Plan Introduction 1. General outline of a conflict. 2. Approach, theory, level of analysis (providing framework). Providing the hypothesis 3. Major actors involved, definition of their priorities, preferences and interests. 4. Origins of the conflict (historical perspective), major actions timeline 5. Models of conflicts, explanations of its reasons 6. Proving the hypothesis 7. Conclusion Bibliography Introduction Northern Ireland conflict, called “the Troubles” was the most durable conflict in the Europe since WW2. Before War in Donbass (2014-present), which lead to 9,371 death up to June 3, 20161 it also can be called the bloodiest conflict, but unfortunately The Donbass War snatched from The Troubles “the victory palm” of this dreadful competition. The importance of this issue, however, is still essential and vital because of challenges Europe experience now. Both proxy war on Donbass and recent terrorist attacks had strained significantly the political atmosphere in Europe, showing that Europe is not safe anymore. In this conditions, it is necessary for us to try to assume, how far this insecurity and tensions might go and will the circumstances and the challenges of a international relations ignite the conflict in Northern Ireland again. It also makes sense for us to recognize that the Troubles was also a proxy war to a certain degree 23 Sources, used in this essay are mostly mass-media articles, human rights observers’ and international organizations reports, and surveys made by political scientists on this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • 65 Question History Test. See If You Can Get 100%
    65 QUESTION HISTORY TEST. SEE IF YOU CAN GET 100%. HERE’S THE TEST: 1. 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by: a. Superman b. Jay Leno c. Long-haired pot head d. A Muslim male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40 suffering from pre-traumatic stress disorder. This murderer was a twenty-four year old Palestinian immigrant named Sirhan Sirhan. 2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, Israeli athletes were kidnapped and massacred by : a. Olga Corbett b. Sitting Bull c. Arnold Schwarzenegger d. Muslim male extremists between the ages of 17 and 40 unable to cope with the strain of competition between nation states in which they saw medals as signs of warlike domination 3. In November 1979, the US embassy in Tehran Iran was seized and taken over and 66 hostages are taken. This seizure was an outright attack on American Soil. The hostages were held for 444 days and were released on the day of President Reagan’s inauguration. The embassy was taken over by: a. Lost Norwegians interviewing candidates for kinetic Nobel Prizes, for potential future acts of valor they might commit b. Elvis c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women d. Muslim male extremists between the ages of 17 and 40 strained by the invasion of infidels on their soil and unable to attend US universities on scholarship. One of the participants in the seizure of the embassy may have been Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the current President of Iran who holds a Ph.D. in traffic and transport engineering from Tehran University of Science and Technology and was a 23-year old student at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Knows No Borders
    TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS October 2019 his is a special initiative for SEFF to be associated with, it is one part of a three part overall Project which includes; the production of a Book and DVD Twhich captures the testimonies and experiences of well over 20 innocent victims and survivors of terrorism from across Great Britain and The Republic of Ireland. The Project title; ‘Terrorism knows NO Borders’ aptly illustrates the broader point that we are seeking to make through our involvement in this work, namely that in the context of Northern Ireland terrorism and criminal violence was not curtailed to Northern Ireland alone but rather that individuals, families and communities experienced its’ impacts across the United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland and beyond these islands. This Memorial Quilt Project does not claim to represent the totality of lives lost across Great Britain and The Republic of Ireland but rather seeks to provide some understanding of the sacrifices paid by communities, families and individuals who have been victimised by ‘Republican’ or ‘Loyalist’ terrorism. SEFF’s ethos means that we are not purely concerned with victims/survivors who live within south Fermanagh or indeed the broader County.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 10.7.2020 COM(2020) 306 Final
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 10.7.2020 COM(2020) 306 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS 2020 EU Justice Scoreboard EN EN 1. INTRODUCTION Effective justice systems are essential for implementing EU law and for upholding the rule of law and the values upon which the EU is founded. National courts act as EU courts when applying EU law. It is national courts in the first place that ensure that the rights and obligations provided under EU law are enforced effectively (Article 19 TEU). Effective justice systems are also essential for mutual trust, the investment climate and the sustainability of long-term growth. For this reason, improving the efficiency, quality and independence of national justice systems continues to feature among the priorities of the European Semester – the EU’s annual cycle of economic policy coordination. The 2020 annual sustainable growth strategy, which sets out the economic and employment policy strategy for the EU and places sustainability and social inclusion at the heart of the EU's economic policymaking, reiterates the link between effective justice systems and the business environment in Member States. Well-functioning and fully independent justice systems can have a positive impact on investment and therefore contribute to productivity and competitiveness. They are also important to ensure effective cross-border enforcement of contracts and administrative decisions and dispute resolution, which are essential for the functioning of the single market (1). Against this background, the EU Justice Scoreboard presents an annual overview of indicators focusing on the essential parameters of effective justice systems: efficiency, quality and independence.
    [Show full text]