DOCSLIB.ORG

Confabulation Behavior and False Memories in Korsakoff's Syndrome: Role of Source Memory and Executive Functioning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Confabulation Behavior and False Memories in Korsakoff's Syndrome: Role of Source Memory and Executive Functioning Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2008; 62: 220–225 doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01758.x Regular Article Confabulation behavior and false memories in Korsakoff’s syndrome: Role of source memory and executive functioning Roy P. C. Kessels, PhD,1,2* Hans E. Kortrijk, MSc,3 Arie J. Wester, MSc4 and Gudrun M. S. Nys, PhD5 1Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, Radboud University Nijmegen, 2Departments of Medical Psychology and Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, 3GGZ Group BAVO/Europoort, Rotterdam, 4Korsakoff Clinic, Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Venray, the Netherlands and 5Laboratory for Neuropsychology, Department of Internal Medicine – Section Neurology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Aims: Confabulation behavior is common in a word-list learning paradigm (a modification of the patients with Korsakoff’s syndrome. A distinction can Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test). be made between spontaneous and provoked con- Results: There were deficits in source memory, in fabulations, which may have different underlying which patients incorrectly assigned previously cognitive mechanisms. Provoked confabulations may learned words to an incorrect word list. Also, Korsa- be related to intrusions on memory tests, whereas koff patients had extensive executive deficits, but no spontaneous confabulations may be due to executive relationship between the severity of these deficits dysfunction or a source memory deficit. and the severity of confabulation or intrusions on a Methods: In 19 chronic Korsakoff patients, spontane- memory task was found. ous confabulations were quantified by third-party Conclusion: The present findings provide evidence rating (Likert scale). Provoked confabulations were for a dissociation between spontaneous confabula- assessed using the Dalla Barba Confabulation Battery. tion, provoked confabulation and false memories. Furthermore, assessment of executive function was performed using an extensive neuropsychological Key words: amnesia, confabulation, neuropsychol- battery. False memories (i.e. intrusions) and source ogy, source memory. memory were measured using twoparallelversions of ORSAKOFF’S SYNDROME IS characterized by made between two types of confabulation behavior. Ksevere amnesia in the absence of dementia,1,2 and First, spontaneous confabulations refer to incorrect Korsakoff patients typically show profound confa- memories that patients spontaneously recall without bulation behavior.3 Originally these confabulations any external trigger, in accordance with which the were regarded as secondary to the amnesia, that is, patient also acts. In turn, provoked confabulations that patients used confabulation behavior to fill up occur when the patient is explicitly prompted for a memory gaps,4 but confabulations and amnesia do response, for example in a test setting.6 Not only can not necessarily co-occur.5 Generally, a distinction is these two types of confabulation behavior be distin- guished behaviorally, but there is also evidence that they have different neurocognitive underpinnings.7–9 *Correspondence: Roy P. C. Kessels, PhD, Radboud University Spontaneous confabulations are thought to be due to Nijmegen, NICI/Neuropsychology and Rehabilitation, PO Box 9104, impaired source memory, that is, a deficit in remem- 6500 HE Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Email: [email protected] bering contextual information about an event, and Received 6 August 2007; revised 1 November 2007; accepted 8 November 2007. temporal confusion, that is, the difficulty in distin- 220 © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2008; 62: 220–225 Confabulation behavior in amnesia 221 aguishing irrelevant and old memory traces from rel- evant and new traces referring to the ongoing real- Materials ity.10 However, spontaneous confabulation behavior Confabulation behavior may also be related to executive dysfunction, specifi- The Dalla Barba Confabulation Battery was used, 11 cally concept shifting and divided attention, or the which is a structured interview in which the patient 12 result of a strategic retrieval deficit. In turn, pro- answers 64 questions tapping semantic memory, epi- voked confabulations are similar to erroneous sodic memory, prospective memory and spatial ori- responses or false memories occurring during neu- entation.18 All interviews were performed by the same 8 ropsychological testing and can also be observed in investigator (H.E.K.) and were recorded on audio- 13 healthy participants. Most studies examining the cassette. The patients’ responses were later scored as neurocognitive mechanisms of confabulation have correct, incorrect or confabulation, depending on the 14,15 10 focused on dementia or ruptured aneurysms. consistency with information about the patients. This Moreover, to date no study has examined spontane- battery has been developed to assess different types ous and provoked confabulations in combination. In of confabulation content and has been validated the present study we investigated the role of executive in clinical populations,15,19 but because this battery dysfunction, source memory and false memories in prompts the patient for an answer, it assesses only both spontaneous and provoked confabulation provoked confabulation behavior. behavior in patients with Korsakoff’s syndrome. Spontaneous confabulation frequency was assessed by the nursing staff of the institution. They were provided with the following definition of spon- METHODS taneous confabulation behavior: ‘Confabulations are the result of erroneous memories. These can be Patients memories of events that never occurred or traces of real experiences that are incorrect with respect to time Nineteen Korsakoff patients participated in this study or place. These incorrect memories do not have the Ϯ (14 men). Mean age was 58.8 8.8 years. Education intention to mislead. Spontaneous confabulations level was assessed using seven categories, 1 being occur without an external trigger and occur merely the lowest (less than primary school) and 7 the on the basis of spontaneity, that is, the patient acts highest (academic degree); mean education level according to the content of the memory. The ques- Ϯ was 4.7 1.2. All were inpatients of the Korsakoff tion is for you to indicate to which degree this patient Clinic of Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry confabulates based on his/her current behavior’. Sub- in Venray, the Netherlands and were diagnosed sequently they were asked to rate the spontaneous 1–6 months prior to the investigation. All patients confabulation behavior of the patient based on his or fulfilled the criteria for DSM–IV alcohol-induced per- her current behavior using a 5-point Likert scale (1, 16 sisting amnestic disorder and the criteria for Korsa- never; 2, seldom; 3, sometimes; 4, often; 5, always). koff syndrome described by Kopelman.1 All patients were in the chronic, amnesic stage of the syndrome; none of the patients was in the confusional phase at Neuropsychological assessment the moment of testing (i.e. Wernicke psychosis). All Premorbid verbal intelligence level was estimated patients had an extensive history of alcoholism and with the National Adult Reading Task.20 Executive nutritional depletion, notably thiamine deficiency, functioning was measured with an extensive neuro- verified through medical charts or family reports. psychological battery tapping all aspects of executive Neuroradiological examination (computed tomogra- functioning,21,22 that is, mental flexibility was mea- phy or magnetic resonance imaging) showed signs sured with the Trail-Making Test, concept shifting of brain atrophy and non-specific white-matter and rule detection by the Modified Card-Sorting Test lesions in most patients, which are often found in and the Brixton Spatial Anticipation Test, response Korsakoff’s syndrome but are not a necessary crite- generation with the Category Fluency test, response rion for the diagnosis.1 None of the patients fulfilled inhibition with the Stroop Color–Word Test and the clinical criteria for alcohol dementia.17 The study planning with the Key Search subtest from the Behav- was approved by the local ethics committee and ioral Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) informed consent was obtained. battery. Working memory was measured using the © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology 222 R. P. C. Kessels et al. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2008; 62: 220–225 Digit Span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence working memory but profound deficits in long-term Test–Third Edition,23 long-term memory was assessed memory and executive function (Table 1). Table 2 using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), shows the results for the source memory task. The version A, which consists of a list of 15 words that patients made more false alarms from the RAVLT-A have to be remembered in five subsequent trials, fol- list than from the new distracter items (t(18) = 6.3, lowed by a 15-min delay, after which a free recall and P < 0.0005), but this inability was not correlated with recognition trial followed.24 The neuropsychological confabulation behavior or any of the neuropsycho- test results were converted to standard scores using logical tests. The total number of intrusions (i.e. false the available normative data (i.e. percentiles, deciles, memories on RAVLT-A and RAVLT-B recall taken scaled scores, equivalent scores or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Confabulation in Patients RENSON Publishedonline11sepetember2015 GREEN
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1084377 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Renson, Y. C. M., Oosterman, J. M., van Damme, J. E., Griekspoor, S. I. A., Wester, A. J., Kopelman, M. D., & Kessels, R. P. C. (2015). Assessment of Confabulation in Patients with Alcohol-Related Cognitive Disorders: The Nijmegen–Venray Confabulation List (NVCL-20). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29, 804-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1084377 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Compare and Contrast Two Models Or Theories of One Cognitive Process with Reference to Research Studies
    ! The following sample is for the learning objective: Compare and contrast two models or theories of one cognitive process with reference to research studies. What is the question asking for? * A clear outline of two models of one cognitive process. The cognitive process may be memory, perception, decision-making, language or thinking. * Research is used to support the models as described. The research does not need to be outlined in a lot of detail, but underatanding of the role of research in supporting the models should be apparent.. * Both similarities and differences of the two models should be clearly outlined. Sample response The theory of memory is studied scientifically and several models have been developed to help The cognitive process describe and potentially explain how memory works. Two models that attempt to describe how (memory) and two models are memory works are the Multi-Store Model of Memory, developed by Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968), clearly identified. and the Working Memory Model of Memory, developed by Baddeley & Hitch (1974). The Multi-store model model explains that all memory is taken in through our senses; this is called sensory input. This information is enters our sensory memory, where if it is attended to, it will pass to short-term memory. If not attention is paid to it, it is displaced. Short-term memory Research. is limited in duration and capacity. According to Miller, STM can hold only 7 plus or minus 2 pieces of information. Short-term memory memory lasts for six to twelve seconds. When information in the short-term memory is rehearsed, it enters the long-term memory store in a process called “encoding.” When we recall information, it is retrieved from LTM and moved A satisfactory description of back into STM.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissociation Between Declarative and Procedural Mechanisms in Long-Term Memory
    ! DISSOCIATION BETWEEN DECLARATIVE AND PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS IN LONG-TERM MEMORY A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Dale A. Hirsch August, 2017 ! A dissertation written by Dale A. Hirsch B.A., Cleveland State University, 2010 M.A., Cleveland State University, 2013 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by _________________________, Director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Bradley Morris _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Christopher Was _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Karrie Godwin Accepted by _________________________, Director, School of Lifespan Development and Mary Dellmann-Jenkins Educational Sciences _________________________, Dean, College of Education, Health and Human James C. Hannon Services ! ""! ! HIRSCH, DALE A., Ph.D., August 2017 Educational Psychology DISSOCIATION BETWEEN DECLARATIVE AND PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS IN LONG-TERM MEMORY (66 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Bradley Morris The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential dissociation between declarative and procedural elements in long-term memory for a facilitation of procedural memory (FPM) paradigm. FPM coupled with a directed forgetting (DF) manipulation was utilized to highlight the dissociation. Three experiments were conducted to that end. All three experiments resulted in facilitation for categorization operations. Experiments one and two additionally found relatively poor recognition for items that participants were told to forget despite the fact that relevant categorization operations were facilitated. Experiment three resulted in similarly poor recognition for category names that participants were told to forget. Taken together, the three experiments in this investigation demonstrate a clear dissociation between the procedural and declarative elements of the FPM task.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Memory and Cued Recall Max V
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern University Honors Program Theses 2016 Working memory and cued recall Max V. Fey 8602950 Karen Naufel Georgia Southern University Lawrence Locker Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses Part of the Cognitive Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Fey, Max V. 8602950; Naufel, Karen; and Locker, Lawrence, "Working memory and cued recall" (2016). University Honors Program Theses. 220. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses/220 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Working Memory and Cued Recall Working Memory and Cued Recall An Honors Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of Psychology. By Maximilian Fey Under the mentorship of Dr. Karen Naufel ABSTRACT Previous research has found that individuals with high working memory have greater recall capabilities than those with low working memory (Unsworth, Spiller, & Brewers, 2012). Research did not test the extent to which cues affect one’s recall ability in relation to working memory. The present study will examine this issue. Participants completed a working memory measure. Then, they were provided with cued recall tasks whereby they recalled Facebook friends. The cues varied to be no cues, ambiguous cues high in imageability, and cues directly related to Facebook. The results showed that there was no difference between individual’s ability to recall their Facebook friends and their working memory scores.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is It Like to Be Confabulating?
    What is it like to be Confabulating? Sahba Besharati, Aikaterini Fotopoulou and Michael D. Kopelman Kings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London UK Different kinds of confabulations may arise in neurological and psychiatric disorders. This chapter first offers conceptual distinctions between spontaneous and momentary (“provoked”) confabulations, as well as between these types of confabulation and other kinds of false memories. The chapter then reviews current explanatory theories, emphasizing that both neurocognitive and motivational factors account for the content of confabulations. We place particular emphasis on a general model of confabulation that considers cognitive dysfunctions in memory and executive functioning in parallel with social and emotional factors. It is argued that all these dimensions need to be taken into account for a phenomenologically rich description of confabulation. The role of the motivated content of confabulation and the subjective experience of the patient are particularly relevant in effective management and rehabilitation strategies. Finally, we discuss a case example in order to illustrate how seemingly meaningless false memories are actually meaningful if placed in the context of the patient’s own perspective and autobiographical memory. Key words: Confabulation; False memory; Motivation; Self; Rehabilitation. 1 Memory is often subject to errors of omission and commission such that recollection includes instances of forgetting, or distorting past experience. The study of pathological forms of exaggerated memory distortion has provided useful insights into the mechanisms of normal reconstructive remembering (Johnson, 1991; Kopelman, 1999; Schacter, Norman & Kotstall, 1998). An extreme form of pathological memory distortion is confabulation. Different variants of confabulation are found to arise in neurological and psychiatric disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional–Anatomic Correlates of Control Processes in Memory
    The Journal of Neuroscience, May 15, 2003 • 23(10):3999–4004 • 3999 Functional–Anatomic Correlates of Control Processes in Memory Randy L. Buckner Department of Psychology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 Introduction when memory retrieval requires flexible use of control processes A central role for control processes in long-term memory is ap- (Milner et al., 1985; Schacter, 1987; Shimmamura et al., 1991). In parent when one considers that there is far more information many cases, patients will fail to recall, or sometimes even recog- available in memory than can be accessed at any single moment nize, information (for review, see Wheeler et al., 1995) or inap- (Tulving and Pearlstone, 1966; Koriat, 2000). Much as selective propriately estimate the source or timing, or both, of a past epi- attention operates to focus processing on objects in the environ- sode (for review, see Schacter, 1987). In rare cases, a patient may ment, related control processes are required to constrain and make up episodes from the past while believing they really hap- select from information stored in memory. pened, a phenomenon called “confabulation” (Moscovitch, Neuroimaging studies have expanded our understanding of 1989; Burgess and Shallice, 1996). Unlike purer forms of amnesia, control processes in long-term memory in three important ways. which result from medial temporal and diencephalic lesions First, networks of regions, prominently including specific regions (Scoville and Milner, 1957; Squire, 1992; Cohen and Eichen- in prefrontal cortex, contribute to control processes during baum, 1993), the deficits after frontal damage align more to im- memory retrieval.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Study on the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive
    Dementia & Neuropsychologia ISSN: 1980-5764 [email protected] Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento Brasil da Costa Armentano, Cristiane Garcia; Sellitto Porto, Cláudia; Dozzi Brucki, Sonia Maria; Nitrini, Ricardo Study on the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) performance in healthy individuals, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. A preliminary study Dementia & Neuropsychologia, vol. 3, núm. 2, abril-junio, 2009, pp. 101-107 Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento São Paulo, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339529013006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Dementia & Neuropsychologia 2009 June;3(2):101-107 Original Article Study on the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) performance in healthy individuals, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s disease A preliminary study Cristiane Garcia da Costa Armentano1, Cláudia Sellitto Porto2, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki3, Ricardo Nitrini4 Abstract – Executive deficits as well as deficits in episodic memory characterize the initial phases of Alzheimer Disease (AD) and are clinically correlated to neuropsychiatric symptoms and functional loss. Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment present more problems as to inhibitory response control, switching and cognitive flexibility.Objective: To compare performance on the BADS with performance on other executive functional tests among patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease, Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) to performance of control individuals and to examine discriminative capacity of BADS among these groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Memory and the Organization of Brain Systems
    4818 • The Journal of Neuroscience, April 30, 2008 • 28(18):4818–4822 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Working Memory and the Organization of Brain Systems Yael Shrager,1 Daniel A. Levy,2 Ramona O. Hopkins,3 and Larry R. Squire4 1University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, 2Weizmann Institute of Science, Rechovot 76100, Israel, 3Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, and 4Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California 92161 Working memory has historically been viewed as an active maintenance process that is independent of long-term memory and indepen- dent of the medial temporal lobe. However, impaired performance across brief time intervals has sometimes been described in amnesic patients with medial temporal lobe damage. These findings raise a fundamental question about how to know when performance depends on working memory and when the capacity for working memory has been exceeded and performance depends on long-term memory. We describe a method for identifying working memory independently of patient performance. We compared patients with medial temporal lobe damage to controls who were given either distraction or no distraction between study and test. In four experiments, we found concordance between the performance of patients and the effect of distraction on controls. The patients were impaired on tasks in which distraction had minimal effect on control performance, and the patients were intact on tasks in which distraction disrupted control performance. We suggest that the patients were impaired when the task minimally depended on working memory (and instead depended substantially on long-term memory), and they performed well when the task depended substantially on working memory.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Working Memory and How Does It Affect Learning?
    3/16/2016 What is working Do you observe these behaviours? memory and how does Is easily distracted when doing something not highly it affect learning? interesting Has trouble waiting his/her turn Struggles with getting started and completing a task. Watches and depends on friends to remind them of the current task Difficulty organising something with multiple steps… frequently stops, frequently loses their place Often seems restless and on the go Fails to progress despite working hard Quick mental arithmetic What is working memory? Who does it affect? 7 + 9 x 3 –4 = 35 x 9 = 35 x 76 = 1 3/16/2016 How does it differ from short term What is working memory? memory? Repeating multi-part instructions A system for temporary Carrying out instructions storage and manipulation of information, necessary for wide range of cognitive tasks Remembering a street address Following driving directions The ability to keep information Following driving directions as a new driver active in your mind for a short period of time (seconds) keeping it available for further processing Working memory is an essential function Alan Baddeley’s Working Memory Metaphor in every day life Central Executive Processes all stimuli we encounter Delegates it to the different parts of our brain that can take action Allows us to block out unnecessary information Visuo-Spatial Phonological Loop Episodic Buffer It keeps us updated on what’s Sketch Pad happening – and keeps us focused on what matters 2 3/16/2016 Working Memory (WM) Capacity: Storage AND Attention Dependent on Many Variables • WM capacity – affected by deficit: disease, genetics, age….but also fatigue, medication, mood.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Memory
    Working Memory Chapter 4 1 Working Memory Some memories are very fragile and go into oblivion very quickly. Working memory is one such memory. 1. Try this. Do this mentally. Write your answers on paper. a. 7 X 9 = 63 b. 74 X 9 = 666 c. 74 X 96 = 7104 2 Working Memory (WM) 1. We know attention is limited. So information that gets to memory is also limited. Thus capacity of working memory is limited. 2. Working memory is brief, immediate memory we use for current information. A portion of working memory coordinates ongoing mental activities. 3. Working memory has been known as short-term memory, and is contrasted from long-term. Some investigators believe the two are the same (Nairne, 2002). 3 1 Classic Research on Working Memory (Short-term Memory) 4 Short-term Memory In the 19th century, Sir George Hamilton discovered that he could accurately store about 7 items (marbles) in memory if he glanced at the items quickly. If the items were more than 7 his accuracy decreased. Sir George Hamilton 5 Short-term Memory 1. Miller (1956) wrote, “The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information”. 2. Miller suggested that the capacity of our short-term memory was small. We could store about 5-9 items in it. 3. He also showed that items could be “chunked”, which would increase our memory capacity. George Miller 6 2 Try This ! C T A I I L T C S F R O R E C A L L ! F R A C T O L I S T I C R E C A L L ! 7 Another Example 870-230-5339 (10 items) 870 + 230 + 5 3 3 9 (1) (1) (4) 2 chunks + 4 items (6 items) Capacity of short-term memory may be increased by a process called “chunking”.
    [Show full text]
  • Disordered Memory Awareness: Recollective Confabulation in Two Cases of Persistent Déj`A Vecu
    Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 1362–1378 Disordered memory awareness: recollective confabulation in two cases of persistent dej´ a` vecu Christopher J.A. Moulin a,b,∗, Martin A. Conway b, Rebecca G. Thompson a, Niamh James a, Roy W. Jones a a The Research Institute for the Care of the Elderly, St. Martin’s Hospital, UK b Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK Received 7 April 2004; received in revised form 10 December 2004; accepted 16 December 2004 Available online 11 March 2005 Abstract We describe two cases of false recognition in patients with dementia and diffuse temporal lobe pathology who report their memory difficulty as being one of persistent dej´ a` vecu—the sensation that they have lived through the present moment before. On a number of recognition tasks, the patients were found to have high levels of false positives. They also made a large number of guess responses but otherwise appeared metacognitively intact. Informal reports suggested that the episodes of dej´ a` vecu were characterised by sensations similar to those present when the past is recollectively experienced in normal remembering. Two further experiments found that both patients had high levels of recollective experience for items they falsely recognized. Most strikingly, they were likely to recollectively experience incorrectly recognised low frequency words, suggesting that their false recognition was not driven by familiarity processes or vague sensations of having encountered events and stimuli before. Importantly, both patients made reasonable justifications for their false recognitions both in the experiments and in their everyday lives and these we term ‘recollective confabulation’.
    [Show full text]
  • Sleep Problems Across Development: a Pathway to Adolescent Risk Taking Through Working Memory
    J Youth Adolescence DOI 10.1007/s10964-014-0179-7 EMPIRICAL RESEARCH Sleep Problems Across Development: A Pathway to Adolescent Risk Taking Through Working Memory April Gile Thomas • Kathryn C. Monahan • Angela F. Lukowski • Elizabeth Cauffman Received: 22 April 2014 / Accepted: 23 August 2014 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 Abstract Problematic sleep can be detrimental to the middle childhood to adolescence. Although sleep problems development of important cognitive functions, such as in infancy, early childhood, and middle childhood were not working memory, and may have the potential for negative directly related to adolescent working memory, sleep behavioral consequences, such as risk-taking. In this way, problems during adolescence were associated with poorer sleep problems may be particularly harmful for youth— adolescent working memory. In turn, these deficits in whose cognitive abilities are still developing and who are working memory were related to greater risk taking in late more susceptible to risky behavior. Using data from a large, adolescence. In summary, the present results suggest that national, longitudinal study, continuity and change in sleep sleep problems in earlier periods are indicative of risk for problems were examined from 2 to 15 years of age and sleep problems later in development, but that sleep problems associated with deficits in working memory at age 15 and in adolescence contribute uniquely to deficits in working risk taking behaviors at age 18. Participants (N = 1,364 memory that, in turn, lead to risky behavior during late children; 48.3 % female) were assessed for sleep problems adolescence. (parent-report), working memory (behavioral task), and risk taking behavior (youth self-report).
    [Show full text]