CASE STUDY of WIKILEAKS Final Master Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CASE STUDY of WIKILEAKS Final Master Thesis VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND DIPLOMACY PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT Maja Mišović CONCEPTUAL ASPECTS AND PRACTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF WHISTLEBLOWING: CASE STUDY OF WIKILEAKS Final Master Thesis Journalism and Media Industries Study Program, state code 621P50002 Degree in Journalism Supervisor Prof. Dr. Auksė Balčytienė _________ __________ (acad. title, name, surname) (Signature) (Date) Defended __________________ __________ __________ (Dean of the Faculty) (Signature) (Date) Kaunas, 2017 VYTAUTO DIDŽIOJO UNIVERSITETAS POLITIKOS MOKSLŲ IR DIPLOMATIJOS FAKULTETAS VIEŠOSIOS KOMUNIKACIJOS KATEDRA Maja Mišović KONCEPCINIAI PRANEŠIMŲ (WHISTLEBLOWING) ASPEKTAI IR PRAKTINĖS CHARAKTERISTIKOS: „WIKILEAKS“ ATVEJIS Magistro baigiamasis darbas Žurnalistikos ir medijų industrijų studijų programa, valstybinis kodas 621P50002 Žurnalistikos studijų kryptis Vadovas (-ė) Prof. Dr. Auksė Balčytienė _________ __________ (Moksl. laipsnis, vardas, pavardė) (Parašas) (Data) Apginta ___________________ __________ __________ (Fakulteto/studijų instituto dekanas/direktorius) (Parašas) (Data) Kaunas, 2017 1 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Whistleblowing Through Academic Filters ............................................................................... 10 2.1. What does it mean to blow a whistle? ................................................................................. 10 2.2. Wikileaks’ X-ray ................................................................................................................ 11 2.3. Shades of whistleblowing ................................................................................................... 12 2.4. (Non-)journalistic sides of whistleblowing ......................................................................... 13 2.5. Forces which drive whistleblowing .................................................................................... 16 2.6. Impact of whistleblowing on traditional journalism ............................................................ 19 2.7. Has Wikileaks managed to change the world? .................................................................... 21 2.8. What goes around, comes around ....................................................................................... 22 2.9. Has Wikileaks any guardians? ............................................................................................ 24 3.Wikileaks Below Magnifier ....................................................................................................... 27 3.1. “It was a journey from the local to the global and back again“ ............................................ 27 3.2. „My ordinary life would never be the same again“ ............................................................. 29 3.3. „We don’t splash stories, we convey information“ .............................................................. 29 3.4. Wikileaks in journalism and around it ................................................................................ 31 3.5. „The data is essentially unreachable, unless the person to whom the data refers wishes to make an effort to reveal it“ ........................................................................................................ 32 3.6. „My first word was ‘Why?’ It was also my favourite“ ........................................................ 33 3.7. „From having fun to ending up wanting to change the world“ ............................................ 35 3.8. „I was under the greatest pressure of my life. I was being surveilled“ ................................. 36 3.9. „The Internet is the biggest surveillance tool in the world“ ................................................. 38 3.10. Potentials of Wikileaks and its influences on transparency................................................ 39 4. New Perceptions On The Issue Of Wikileaks ............................................................................ 42 4.1.Whistleblowing viruses ....................................................................................................... 44 4.2.Shooting the messenger ....................................................................................................... 45 4.3. Journalistic-feature enigma ................................................................................................. 46 4.4. Wikileaks resource of consumption .................................................................................... 47 4.5. Fight for the right ............................................................................................................... 48 5. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 50 Literature ...................................................................................................................................... 52 Academic articles ...................................................................................................................... 52 Laws ......................................................................................................................................... 53 Academic Journals .................................................................................................................... 53 Online articles and other sources ............................................................................................... 54 Newspapers ............................................................................................................................... 55 Television ................................................................................................................................. 55 2 Conceptual aspects and practical characteristics of whistleblowing: Case study of Wikileaks Summary Nowadays a global statement, that the humanity have not lived in more democratic period with the lowest rate of censorship than ever before, is spread world wide. That ubiquitous point of view is supported by the Internet and online media where the audience could be informed about everything, almost everywhere and immediately. However, thanks to whistleblowing and vast information disclosures, it is obvious that there are huge datasets that governments keep away from the public. The problem emerges to be even bigger because those materials are the part of the public interest. So, to comprehend this issue and to explain it, this paper is going to be analysis of the clash among journalistic disclosures and ethical dilemmas. The reason is that all materials are revealed thanks to hacking govermental sources or by anonymous or some illegal ways of information leaking. On the other hand, it is the right of society to be informed about war, corruption, surveillance and other hidden issues. Furthermore, this thesis is going to be devoted to the reactions of the United States of America and the United Kingdom goverments and how do they act in terms of cutting down the leaks or how to stop it completely. The whole procedure of analysing is going to be spread through the example of one of the biggest and the most important whistleblowing organizations, which is named Wikileaks. During the development and uncovering of the study case, there are going to be answered even question how does it affect the journalistic profession and which are options that could afford the clearer image of the reality to the society. Regarding goals of this master's thesis it is recapitulated what is whistleblowing and why it is beneficial for the public interest and how it supports human and media rights. Further, it is realized how whistleblowing affects journalism and which are ways to draw attention of journalists to do their job more professionally and independently. Finally, it led till solutions how to fight against govermental opressions and surveillance through the example of Wikileaks. Keywords: whistleblowing, leaking, Wikileaks, disclosure, ethics, surveillance, Assange 3 Koncepciniai pranešimų (whistleblowing) aspektai ir praktinės charakteristikos: „Wikileaks“ atvejis Santrauka Šiandien plačiai paplitęs teiginys, kad žmonija dar niekada negyveno labiau demokratiškais laikais, kai cenzūra juntama mažiausiai. Šį dažnai daug kur matomą požiūrį pagrindžia internetas ir internetinė žiniasklaida, kur auditorija akimirksniu gali būti informuota apie bet ką ir bet kur. Vis dėlto, dėka pranešėjų (angl. whistleblowers) ir didelių informacijos atskleidimo atvejų, akivaizdu, kad yra didelis kiekis informacijos, kurią skirtinga valdžia slepia nuo visuomenės. Šią problemą dar didesne daro tai, kad slepiama informacija yra viešų interesų dalis. Tam, kad būtų galima suvokti esamą problemą ir ją paaiškinti, šiame darbe bus analizuojama priešprieša tarp žurnalistinio informacijos atskleidimo ir ir etinių dilemų. Didžioji dalis slaptos informacijos dažniausiai atskleidžiama anonimiškai ir nelegaliai, prieš valdžios valią. Kita vertus, visuomenė turi teisę būti informuota apie galimus karo, korupcijos, sekimo ir ir kitus jai aktualius atvejus. Šiame darbe tirta JAV ir Jungtinės Karalystės valdžios reakcija į slaptos informacijos nutekinimo atvejus ir atsakomieji veiksmai, kurių imamasi norint užkirsti tam kelią. Pagrindinė tyrimo analizė paremta „WikiLeaks“, kuri yra viena didžiausių pranešimus skleidžiančių organizacijų pasaulyje, pavyzdžiais. Atliekant
Recommended publications
  • In Re Motion of Propublica, Inc. for the Release of Court Records [FISC
    IN RE OPINIONS & ORDERS OF THIS COURT ADDRESSING BULK COLLECTION OF DATA Docket No. Misc. 13-02 UNDER THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT IN RE MOTION FOR THE RELEASE OF Docket No. Misc. 13-08 COURT RECORDS IN RE MOTION OF PROPUBLICA, INC. FOR Docket No. Misc. 13-09 THE RELEASE OF COURT RECORDS BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 25 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS, IN SUPPORT OF THE NOVEMBER 6,2013 MOTION BY THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ET AL, FOR THE RELEASE OF COURT RECORDS; THE OCTOBER 11, 2013 MOTION BY THE MEDIA FREEDOM AND INFORMATION ACCESS CLINIC FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S SEPTEMBER 13, 2013 OPINION ON THE ISSUE OF ARTICLE III STANDING; AND THE NOVEMBER 12,2013 MOTION OF PRO PUBLICA, INC. FOR RELEASE OF COURT RECORDS Bruce D. Brown The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 Arlington, VA 22209 Counsel for Amici Curiae November 26. 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................................... iii IDENTITY OF AMICI CURIAE .................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ............................................................................................. 2 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wanting, Not Waiting
    WINNERSdateline OF THE OVERSEAS PRESS CLUB AWARDS 2011 Wanting, Not Waiting 2012 Another Year of Uprisings SPECIAL EDITION dateline 2012 1 letter from the president ne year ago, at our last OPC Awards gala, paying tribute to two of our most courageous fallen heroes, I hardly imagined that I would be standing in the same position again with the identical burden. While last year, we faced the sad task of recognizing the lives and careers of two Oincomparable photographers, Tim Hetherington and Chris Hondros, this year our attention turns to two writers — The New York Times’ Anthony Shadid and Marie Colvin of The Sunday Times of London. While our focus then was on the horrors of Gadhafi’s Libya, it is now the Syria of Bashar al- Assad. All four of these giants of our profession gave their lives in the service of an ideal and a mission that we consider so vital to our way of life — a full, complete and objective understanding of a world that is so all too often contemptuous or ignorant of these values. Theirs are the same talents and accomplishments to which we pay tribute in each of our awards tonight — and that the Overseas Press Club represents every day throughout the year. For our mission, like theirs, does not stop as we file from this room. The OPC has moved resolutely into the digital age but our winners and their skills remain grounded in the most fundamental tenets expressed through words and pictures — unwavering objectivity, unceasing curiosity, vivid story- telling, thought-provoking commentary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pentagon Papers Case and the Wikileaks Controversy: National Security and the First Amendment
    GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2011 The Pentagon Papers Case and the Wikileaks Controversy: National Security and the First Amendment Jerome A. Barron George Washington University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation 1 Wake Forest J. L. & Pol'y 49 (2011) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. V._JB_FINAL READ_NT'L SEC. & FA (DO NOT DELETE) 4/18/2011 11:10 AM THE PENTAGON PAPERS CASE AND THE WIKILEAKS CONTROVERSY: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT JEROME A. BARRON † INTRODUCTION n this Essay, I will focus on two clashes between national security I and the First Amendment—the first is the Pentagon Papers case, the second is the WikiLeaks controversy.1 I shall first discuss the Pentagon Papers case. The Pentagon Papers case began with Daniel Ellsberg,2 a former Vietnam War supporter who became disillusioned with the war. Ellsberg first worked for the Rand Corporation, which has strong associations with the Defense Department, and in 1964, he worked in the Pentagon under then-Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara.3 He then served as a civilian government employee for the U.S. State Department in Vietnam4 before returning to the United † Harold H. Greene Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law School (1998–present); Dean, The George Washington University Law School (1979– 1988); B.A., Tufts University; J.D., Yale Law School; LL.M., The George Washington University.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting the Privacy Movement
    -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Charset: utf-8 Version: GnuPG v2 hQIMA5xNM/DISSENT7ieVABAQ//YbpD8i8BFVKQfbMy I3z8R8k/ez3oexH+sGE+tPRIVACYMOVEMENTRvU+lSB MY5dvAkknydTOF7xIEnODLSq42eKbrCToDMboT7puJSlWr W Meeting the Privacy Movement d 76hzgkusgTrdDSXure5U9841B64SwBRzzkkpLra4FjR / D z e F Dissent in the Digital Age 0 M 0 0 m BIPhO84h4cCOUNTERREVOLUTION0xm17idq3cF5zS2 GXACTIVISTSXvV3GEsyU6sFmeFXNcZLP7My40pNc SOCIALMOVEMENTgQbplhvjN8i7cEpAI4tFQUPN0dtFmCu h8ZOhP9B4h5Y681c5jr8fHzGNYRDC5IZCDH5uEZtoEBD8 FHUMANRIGHTSwxZvWEJ16pgOghWYoclPDimFCuIC 7K0dxiQrN93RgXi/OEnfPpR5nRU/Qv7PROTESTaV0scT nwuDpMiAGdO/byfCx6SYiSURVEILLANCEFnE+wGGpKA0rh C9Qtag+2qEpzFKU7vGt4TtJAsRc+5VhNSAq8OMmi8 n+i4W54wyKEPtkGREENWALDk41TM9DN6ES7sHtA OfzszqKTgB9y10Bu+yUYNO2d4XY66/ETgjGX3a7OY/vbIh Ynl+MIZd3ak5PRIVACYbNQICGtZAjPOITRAS6E ID4HpDIGITALAGEBhcsAd2PWKKgHARRISON4hN4mo7 LIlcr0t/U27W7ITTIEpVKrt4ieeesji0KOxWFneFpHpnVcK t4wVxfenshwUpTlP4jWE9vaa/52y0xibz6az8M62rD9F/ XLigGR1jBBJdgKSba38zNLUq9GcP6YInk5YSfgBVsvTzb VhZQ7kUU0IRyHdEDgII4hUyD8BERLINmdo/9bO/4s El249ZOAyOWrWHISTLEBLOWINGrQDriYnDcvfIGBL 0q1hORVro0EBDqlPA6MOHchfN+ck74AY8HACKTIVISMy 8PZJLCBIjAJEdJv88UCZoljx/6BrG+nelwt3gCBx4dTg XqYzvOSNOWDENTEahLZtbpAnrot5APPELBAUMzAW Qn6tpHj1NSrAseJ/+qNC74QuXYXrPh9ClrNYN6DNJGQ +u8ma3xfeE+psaiZvYsCRYPTOGRAPHYwkZFimy R9bjwhRq35Fe1wXEU4PNhzO5muDUsiDwDIGITAL A Loes Derks van de Ven X o J 9 1 H 0 w J e E n 2 3 S i k k 3 W Z 5 s XEGHpGBXz3njK/Gq+JYRPB+8D5xV8wI7lXQoBKDGAs -----END PGP MESSAGE----- Meeting the Privacy Movement Dissent in the Digital Age by Loes Derks van de Ven A thesis presented to the
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Housing Security and Stability In
    Restoring Housing Security and Stability in New York City Neighborhoods: Recommendations to Stop the Displacement of Dominicans and Other Working-Class Groups in Washington Heights and Inwood Ramona Hernández Yana Kucheva Sarah Marrara Utku Sezgin INTRODUCTION By many objective measures, over the last three decades, New York City has experienced a dramatic reversal of demographic trends. The City regained the population that it lost in the 1970s and became a magnet for college graduates, young adults, and childless families.1 While these demographic trends have undoubtedly added to the vibrancy of the City, the dark underbelly of this type of population change lies in increasing economic inequality and upward pressures on housing prices. These demographic changes and their implications for the housing market have also not been distributed equally across neighborhoods. In fact, neighborhoods that were low-income in 1990 and experienced rent growth above the median for the City, are precisely the ones that also experienced the fastest growth in the number of college graduates, the number of childless households, and the number of white residents.2 This process of gentrification of New York City’s low-income neighborhoods has sharply increased the rent burden for low and moderate income households. Moreover, while gentrifying neighborhoods have added housing units at a pace greater than non-gen- trifying neighborhoods, the share of newly available units affordable to low-income and working-class families has sharply decreased since 2000.3
    [Show full text]
  • Journalism 1
    Journalism 1 deficiencies in foreign language who receive a Deferred Admission or JOURNALISM Admission by Review, may be considered for admission to the college. Students who are admitted through the Admission by Review process Description with core course deficiencies will have certain conditions attached to their enrollment at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln. These conditions The journalism major is built on a solid base of instruction in reporting are explained under Admission to the University, Removal of Deficiencies. and writing, copy editing, visual communication and multimedia High school deficiencies must be removed during the first 30 credit hours journalism. The major also has broadened its curriculum in response to of enrollment at Nebraska (60 hours for foreign language) or the first advancing technology and new electronic and mobile media. Elective calendar year, whichever takes longer. choices include courses in magazine writing, depth reporting, feature writing, sports writing, business writing, photography, design, data Admission Deficiencies/Removal of Deficiencies visualization, Web design, videography and advanced editing. You must remove entrance deficiencies in geometry and foreign language before you can graduate from the College of Journalism and Mass Many of the journalism faculty members have extensive industry Communications. experience at a wide variety of media organizations such as The Miami Herald, ProPublica, The Detroit News, Business Week, Omaha Removing Foreign Language Deficiencies World-Herald, Seward County Independent, Lincoln Journal-Star and A student will need to complete the second semester of the first-year The New York Times. The faculty continues to be connected to the language sequence to clear the deficiency and the second semester of industry, and its members are actively involved in professional media the second-year language sequence to complete the college graduation organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nothing Protects Black Women from Dying in Pregnancy and Childbirth Not Education
    Journalism in the Public Interest MATERNAL HEALTH Nothing Protects Black Women From Dying in Pregnancy and Childbirth Not education. Not income. Not even being an expert on racial disparities in health care. by Nina Martin, ProPublica, and Renee Montagne, NPR Dec. 7, 8 a.m. EST This story was co-published with NPR. On a melancholy Saturday this past February, Shalon Irving’s “village” — the friends and family she had assembled to support her as a single mother — gathered at a funeral home in a prosperous black neighborhood in southwest Atlanta to say goodbye and send her home. The afternoon light was gray but bright, flooding through tall arched windows and pouring past white columns, illuminating the flag that covered her casket. Sprays of callas and roses dotted the room like giant corsages, flanking photos from happier times: Shalon in a slinky maternity dress, sprawled across her couch with her puppy; Shalon, sleepy-eyed and cradling the tiny head of her newborn daughter, Soleil. In one portrait Shalon wore a vibrant smile and the crisp uniform of the Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service, where she had been a lieutenant commander. Many of the mourners were similarly attired. Shalon’s father, Samuel, surveyed the rows of somber faces from the lectern. “I’ve never been in a room with so many doctors,” he marveled. “… I’ve never seen so many Ph.D.s.” At 36, Shalon had been part of their elite ranks — an epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the preeminent public health institution in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Propublica Report to Stakeholders May-August, 2014
    ProPublica Report to Stakeholders The Power of Partnerships May-August, 2014 The latest in a series of periodic reports to our stakeholders about progress at ProPublica. Earlier reports, including our annual report for 2013 and report for the first period of 2014, are available at ProPublica.org. An Unequalled Breadth of Partnerships ProPublica has had 111 different publishing partners over six years—but per- haps more remarkable is the fact that we had 26 partners in the middle four months of 2014 alone. Both the quality and the range of these partnerships were noteworthy, including stories published exclusively with the New York Times, NPR News, the Washington Post, the Atlantic and WNYC. Our work also appeared in BuzzFeed, the Daily Beast, Mashable, Source, the Lens, Center for Investigative Reporting, Univision and Upworthy. We worked with Amazon on ebooks, and with other newspapers including the Albany Times Union, Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, Dallas Morning News, Miami Herald, Newark Star-Led- ger, New York Daily News, Philadelphia Inquirer and Tampa Bay Times. Pro- Publica stories also ran in the magazines Marie Claire and Sports Illustrated. We pursue such partnerships carefully. Some are de- signed to get greater reach for important stories. But most are intended to maximize the chances that our work will have impact and spur change. So when we undertake a national story with a local angle, we’ll often publish the re- sult with a lead local outlet, where the story will naturally be of greater salience. A tale of abusive charges under Medicare that centered in Chicago, published in July in the Chicago Tribune, is a perfect example; so is the story published just two weeks later in the Tampa Bay Times about how a statute designed to protect against predatory auto title loans had been undermined in Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Times 2014 Innovation Report
    Innovation March 24, 2014 Executive Summary Innovation March 24, 2014 2 Executive Summary Introduction and Flipboard often get more traffic from Times journalism than we do. The New York Times is winning at journalism. Of all In contrast, over the last year The Times has the challenges facing a media company in the digi- watched readership fall significantly. Not only is the tal age, producing great journalism is the hardest. audience on our website shrinking but our audience Our daily report is deep, broad, smart and engaging on our smartphone apps has dipped, an extremely — and we’ve got a huge lead over the competition. worrying sign on a growing platform. At the same time, we are falling behind in a sec- Our core mission remains producing the world’s ond critical area: the art and science of getting our best journalism. But with the endless upheaval journalism to readers. We have always cared about in technology, reader habits and the entire busi- the reach and impact of our work, but we haven’t ness model, The Times needs to pursue smart new done enough to crack that code in the digital era. strategies for growing our audience. The urgency is This is where our competitors are pushing ahead only growing because digital media is getting more of us. The Washington Post and The Wall Street crowded, better funded and far more innovative. Journal have announced aggressive moves in re- The first section of this report explores in detail cent months to remake themselves for this age. First the need for the newsroom to take the lead in get- Look Media and Vox Media are creating newsrooms ting more readers to spend more time reading more custom-built for digital.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebooting' Journalism, a Free Press – 2.6 Terabytes at a Time
    A4 LIFESTYLESCLASSIFIEDCOMICSSPORTSJUMPEDIT A4 MONDAY, APRIL 11, 2016 OPINION THE NEWS-ITEM, SHAMOKIN, PA COMMENTARY Cheers and jeers The News-Item’s cheers and jeers for the past week of news: • Cheers to the effort by a a group of local resi- dents to honor police with their Spring Saunter/ Walk to Support Law Enforcement on Thursday night in Shamokin. There was a great turnout, including the presence of some young girls who recognize the value of local police. It’s always nice — no matter the cause — to see the commu- nity come together (and getting some exercise in a walk across town on a chilly spring evening — there’s another plus). It was sadly fitting that on the same front page in which we covered the walk was the story on the child porn-suicide attempt case in Shamokin — a reminder of Rebooting’ journalism, a free exactly the difficult circumstances that law enforcement face every day that were recognized by the walk. press – 2.6 terabytes at a time • Jeers to the Trevorton woman who wreaked havoc with her Ford 150 pickup when she BY GENE POLICINSKI INSIDE THE FIRST AMENDMENT crashed it into parked vehicles along Shamokin Street (Route 225) in the village Thursday, result- The rising global furor over the news operations. WikiLeaks’ 2010 sioned by this nation’s founders for a release of classified diplomatic cables robust and free press. From challeng- ing in damage to six other vehicles that simulat- trove of financial records and other came to just 1.7 gigabytes. Edward ing the nature of million-dollar con- ed a NASCAR pileup.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Everything Has Changed REPORT to STAKEHOLDERS, MAY–AUGUST, 2017 Not Everything Has Changed
    Not Everything Has Changed REPORT TO STAKEHOLDERS, MAY–AUGUST, 2017 Not Everything Has Changed Much has changed since Election Day, November 8, including at ProPublica. We added new beats on immigration, the President’s personal business interests, white supremacy and hate crimes, extra reporting firepower on environmental issues, and much more—not to mention extensive coverage of the new administration, much of it focused on transparency. But the need for the deep-dive investigative report- Renee Montagne. It takes an unsparing look at why ing for which ProPublica is best known remains as the U.S. has the highest maternal death rate in the de- critical as it has ever been. In a short attention-span veloped world. Every year, 700 to 900 American wom- world, in an atmosphere of politics that sometimes en die from pregnancy or childbirth-related causes seems divorced from policy, in a news ecosystem of- (with 60 percent of these deaths being preventable), ten addicted to quick clicks, shallow answers and an and some 65,000 women come very close to dying. absence of context, ProPublica proudly marches to a And while maternal mortality has declined signifi- different drummer. cantly in other wealthy countries in recent years, it is Over the middle period of 2017, ProPublica took on rising in the U.S. stories that other news organizations would pass on as After launching the series with the harrowing being too complex, time-consuming or legally risky. story of Lauren Bloomstein, a neonatal nurse who This kind of journalism is an essential and effective died in childbirth in the hospital where she worked weapon against abuses of power and betrayals of the — of preeclampsia, a preventable type of high blood public trust.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEVATE 2018 – the 14Th Festival Edition from February 28Th to March 4Th 2018
    ELEVATE 2018 – The 14th festival edition from February 28th to March 4th 2018 For the second consecutive time, Elevate will be heralding the arrival of spring. In 2018, the festival for contemporary mu- sic, arts and political discourse will go down in its new time slot in early March. From February 28 to March 4, the multifac- eted music, art and discourse programme will play out in and around the Schloßberg of Graz. Topic of the year 2018: Risk/Courage In 2018 the Elevate Festival will be focused on two fundamental terms of the modern age: risk and courage. Both stand for personal responsibility, progress and engagement. Courageous are those that boldly do good. Risk is an integral part of human life - it stems from unreason, but can also move mountains. How do both of these concepts relate to each other? What risks do human rights activists, journalists and whistleblowers all over the world take? In a time when humanity is faced with cataclysmic boiling points – from climate change to the decay of democracy and the rise of extremism – perhaps there is a need for more courage towards unconventional solutions? Or is a measured and centrist approach more effective? Discourse programme 2018: Julian Assange, Sarah Harrison, Voina and Angela Richter confirmed Among the first confirmed speakers of this year’s Elevate discourse programme is the controversially discussed Wikileaks activist Julian Assange, who will be speaking via live video stream from the Embassy of Ecuador in London, where he lives in politi- cal exile for more than five years. British journalistSarah Harrison will speak on the sometimes life-threatening risks taken by whis- tleblowers as well as present the Courage Foundation, which has provided activists like Edward Snowden, Pussy Riot and Chelsea Manning with legal assistance.
    [Show full text]