DOCSLIB.ORG

CPT/Inf (2019) 20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CPT/Inf (2019) 20 CPT/Inf (2019) 20 Report to the Slovak Government on the visit to the Slovak Republic carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 19 to 28 March 2018 The Slovak Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2019) 21. Strasbourg, 19 June 2019 - 2 - CONTENTS Executive summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 9 A. The visit, the report and follow-up.......................................................................................... 9 B. Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation encountered ................................ 10 C. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention....................... 11 D. National Preventive Mechanism............................................................................................ 11 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED .............................. 12 A. Police custody .......................................................................................................................... 12 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................ 12 2. Ill-treatment ..................................................................................................................... 12 3. Safeguards against ill-treatment ...................................................................................... 15 a. notification of custody ........................................................................................... 15 b. access to a lawyer .................................................................................................. 16 c. access to a doctor ................................................................................................... 17 d. juveniles deprived of their liberty by the police .................................................... 18 e. information on rights ............................................................................................. 18 4. Conditions of detention ................................................................................................... 19 B. Prisons...................................................................................................................................... 21 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................ 21 2. Ill-treatment ..................................................................................................................... 24 3. Situation of life-sentenced prisoners at Leopoldov and Banská Bystrica Prisons .......... 25 4. Situation of high-security prisoners at Leopoldov Prison ............................................... 32 5. Conditions of detention of the general prison population at Banská Bystrica Prison ..... 34 a. adult prisoners ........................................................................................................ 34 b. juvenile prisoners ................................................................................................... 37 6. Health care ...................................................................................................................... 38 - 3 - 7. Other issues ..................................................................................................................... 42 a. staff ........................................................................................................................ 43 b. discipline ................................................................................................................ 43 c. security-related issues ............................................................................................ 45 d. contact with the outside world ............................................................................... 46 C. Psychiatric establishments ..................................................................................................... 48 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................ 48 2. Ill-treatment ..................................................................................................................... 50 3. Patients’ living conditions ............................................................................................... 50 4. Staff and treatment .......................................................................................................... 52 5. Means of restraint ............................................................................................................ 57 6. Safeguards ....................................................................................................................... 61 D. Social care institutions............................................................................................................ 66 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................ 66 2. Ill-treatment ..................................................................................................................... 67 3. Living conditions ............................................................................................................ 67 4. Staff and treatment .......................................................................................................... 69 5. Means of restraint ............................................................................................................ 70 6. Safeguards ....................................................................................................................... 70 APPENDIX I: List of the establishments visited by the CPT’s delegation ................................................. 73 APPENDIX II: List of the national authorities, other bodies and non-governmental organisations met by the CPT’s delegation ................................................................................................. 74 - 4 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the course of the 2018 periodic visit, the CPT’s delegation reviewed the measures taken by the Slovak authorities to implement the recommendations made by the Committee after previous visits. It paid particular attention to the treatment and safeguards afforded to persons deprived of their liberty by the police and the situation of prisoners in three prisons. In addition, the delegation visited two psychiatric establishments and a social care home. The co-operation received throughout the visit, from both the national authorities and staff at the establishments visited, was excellent. That said, the principle of co-operation also requires that the CPT’s recommendations be effectively implemented in practice. In this respect, the Committee is very concerned by the lack of progress since the 2013 visit in a number of areas, in particular as regards the treatment of detained persons by the police, the situation of life-sentenced prisoners and the regime offered to remand prisoners. Police custody It is matter of serious concern for the CPT that a considerable number of persons who were or had recently been detained by the police – including juveniles – made credible allegations of deliberate physical ill-treatment by police officers (such as kicks and baton blows after the person concerned had been brought under control). The delegation also heard several allegations of threats and verbal abuse. The CPT recommends that police officers throughout the country receive a firm message, which should be repeated at regular intervals, that any form of ill-treatment of persons deprived of their liberty – including verbal abuse and threats – is illegal, unprofessional and will be punished. The Committee is again very critical of the continued practice of handcuffing detained persons to wall fixtures or similar objects in police establishments. Some detainees even alleged having been handcuffed to a fixed object inside secure “designated areas” for up to four hours. The CPT once again calls upon the Slovak authorities to stamp out the practice of handcuffing persons to fixed objects. Several recommendations are also made to reinforce the fundamental safeguards against ill-treatment, in particular the right of effective access to a lawyer as from the very outset of the deprivation of liberty, including for juveniles. The CPT also recommends once again that medical examinations of detained persons always be conducted out of the hearing and – unless the doctor concerned expressly requests otherwise in a given case – out of the sight of police officers. The report notes positively that detained persons were usually shown information sheets on their rights and were requested to attest this fact with their signature. However, the information sheets did not always describe all of the detained persons’ rights to their full extent and, in many cases, the persons concerned had apparently not received a copy of the information sheet. Whilst acknowledging that material conditions in custody cells were, on the whole, satisfactory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Program Hospodárskeho a Sociálneho Rozvoja Mesta Leopoldov
    PROGRAM HOSPODÁRSKEHO A SOCIÁLNEHO ROZVOJA MESTA LEOPOLDOV PROGRAM HOSPODÁRSKEHO A SOCIÁLNEHO ROZVOJA MESTA LEOPOLDOV Samosprávny kraj: Trnavský Okres: Hlohovec Región: ZMO - Jaslovské Bohunice Adresa: Mestský úrad Hlohovecká cesta 2 920 41 Leopoldov Tel: 033 / 734 22 07, 734 23 88, 73 Fax: 033 / 734 22 07 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Web: www.leopoldov.sk IČO: 312703 Počet obyvateľov: 4053 Rozloha: 566 ha Prvá písomná zmienka: v roku 1665 Programovacie obdobie 2008 – 2017 2008 2 PROGRAMOVACIE OBDOBIE 2008 - 2017 PROGRAM HOSPODÁRSKEHO A SOCIÁLNEHO ROZVOJA MESTA LEOPOLDOV Sídlo: Povstalecká cesta 16 974 09 Banská Bystrica Poštová adresa: SCARABEO, s.r.o. P.O.BOX č. 8 974 09 Banská Bystrica Tel. fax. Web: 0907 439 224 [email protected] www.scarabeo.sk © SCARABEO, s.r.o. 2008, Banská Bystrica 3 PROGRAMOVACIE OBDOBIE 2008 - 2017 PROGRAM HOSPODÁRSKEHO A SOCIÁLNEHO ROZVOJA MESTA LEOPOLDOV 1 ÚVOD ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2 ZÁKLADNÁ CHARAKTERISTIKA MESTA ............................................................................................................ 11 2.2 PRÍRODNÉ POMERY .............................................................................................................................................. 12 2.3 TECHNICKÁ INFRAŠTRUKTÚRA .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Návrh Generel Dopravy Mesta Hlohovec
    MESTO HLOHOVEC GENEREL DOPRAVY MESTA HLOHOVEC E. NÁVRH SPRIEVODNÁ SPRÁVA Ing. Tomáš Kyseľ, METAG, Banská Bystrica Apríl 2012 Qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasd fghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq MESTO HLOHOVEC wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgGenerel dopravy mesta Hlohovec E. NÁVRH hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc SPRIEVODNÁ SPRÁVA vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq Apríl 2012 wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui Zhotoviteľ : Ing. Tomáš Kyseľ, METAG, Banská Bystrica opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgUrbanizmus: Ing. Oto Janík, CSc., aut. stav. inž. Vedúci projektant: Ing. Oto Janík, CSc., aut. stav. inž. Zodpovedný projektant: Ing. Tomáš Kyseľ Projektant: Ing. Oto Janík, aut. stav. inž. hjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnProjektant: Erika Kyseľová mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas GENEREL DOPRAVY MESTA HLOHOVEC E. NÁVRH E. Návrh Generelu dopravy mesta Hlohovec 1. ÚVOD 3 1.1. Všeobecný popis dopravnej situácie 3 1.2. Ciele riešenia 4 1.3. Východiskové vstupy, použité podklady 4 1.3.1. Východiskové vstupy 4 1.3.2. Použité materiály (podklady) 5 1.4. Skladba dokumentácie 5 2. ŠIRŠIE VZŤAHY 6 3. CESTNÁ DOPRAVA 8 3.1. Návrh ZÁKOS podľa GD mesta Hlohovec 8 3.2. Schémy križovatiek a vzorové priečne rezy 9 3.3. Dopravnoinžinierske výpočty 10 3.3.1. Intenzity automobilovej dopravy podľa výsledkov sčítania SSC v roku 2010 Sk.v./24 hodín 10 3.3.2. Zaťaženie ZÁKOS automobilovou dopravou 10 3.4. Návrh obchvatu mesta Hlohovec podľa GD mesta Hlohovec 16 3.5. Rozdiely v riešení doplnkovej komunikačnej siete a požiadavky čistopisu zadania na spodrobnenie 18 4. STATICKÁ DOPRAVA 19 5. ŽELEZNIČNÁ DOPRAVA 23 6. VODNÁ DOPRAVA 24 7. AUTOBUSOVÁ DOPRAVA 26 7.1. Prímestská autobusová doprava 26 7.2. MHD 27 8. PEŠIA DOPRAVA 27 9. CYKLISTICKÁ DOPRAVA 27 10. DOPADY NÁVRHU GD MESTA HLOHOVEC NA PRIESTOROVÉ A FUNKČNÉ USPORIADANIE 29 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Government of the Slovak Republic on the Visit to the Slovak Republic Carried out by the European Committee
    CPT/Inf (2010) 1 Report to the Government of the Slovak Republic on the visit to the Slovak Republic carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 24 March to 2 April 2009 The Government of the Slovak Republic has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government's response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2010) 2. Strasbourg, 11 February 2010 - 3 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report ........................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................7 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ............................................................. 7 B. Establishments visited.............................................................................................................. 8 C. Consultations held by the delegation ...................................................................................... 9 D. Cooperation between the CPT and the authorities of the Slovak Republic........................ 9 E. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention ...................... 10 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED.............................. 11 A. Police........................................................................................................................................ 11 1. Preliminary
    [Show full text]
  • Chosen Aspects of a Spatially Functional Accessibility by Public Transport: the Case of Trnava Self-Governing Region (Slovakia)
    Acta llogisticaogistica --- International Scientific Journal about Logistics Volume: 7 2020 Issue: 2 Pages: 121-130 ISSN 1339-5629 CHOSEN ASPECTS OF A SPATIALLY FUNCTIONAL ACCESSIBILITY BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT: THE CASE OF TRNAVA SELF-GOVERNING REGION (SLOVAKIA) Miroslava Trembošová; Alena Dubcová; Ľudmila Nagyová; Dagmar Cagáňová doi:10.22306/al.v7i2.171 Received: 30 Apr. 2020 Accepted: 05 June 2020 CHOSEN ASPECTS OF A SPATIALLY FUNCTIONAL ACCESSIBILITY BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT: THE CASE OF TRNAVA SELF-GOVERNING REGION (SLOVAKIA) Miroslava Trembošová Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Geography and Regional Development, 94974 Nitra, Slovakia, EU, [email protected] Alena Dubcová Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Geography and Regional Development, 94974 Nitra, Slovakia, EU, [email protected] Ľudmila Nagyová Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Marketing and Trade, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia, EU, [email protected] Dagmar Cagá ňová Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava, Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management, 91724 Trnava, Slovakia, EU, [email protected] (corresponding author) Keywords: rural area, public transport, accessibility, Trnava Self - Governing Region, Slovak Republic Abstract: The aim of the paper is to analyze transport possibilities of Trnava Self-Governing Region (TTSK) municipalities
    [Show full text]
  • Jews, Poles, and Slovaks: a Story of Encounters, 1944-48
    JEWS, POLES, AND SLOVAKS: A STORY OF ENCOUNTERS, 1944-48 by Anna Cichopek-Gajraj A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Todd M. Endelman, Co-Chair Associate Professor Brian A. Porter-Sz űcs, Co-Chair Professor Zvi Y. Gitelman Professor Piotr J. Wróbel, University of Toronto This dissertation is dedicated to my parents and Ari ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am greatly appreciative of the help and encouragement I have received during the last seven years at the University of Michigan. I have been fortunate to learn from the best scholars in the field. Particular gratitude goes to my supervisors Todd M. Endelman and Brian A. Porter-Sz űcs without whom this dissertation could not have been written. I am also thankful to my advisor Zvi Y. Gitelman who encouraged me to apply to the University of Michigan graduate program in the first place and who supported me in my scholarly endeavors ever since. I am also grateful to Piotr J. Wróbel from the University of Toronto for his invaluable revisions and suggestions. Special thanks go to the Department of History, the Frankel Center for Judaic Studies, and the Center of Russian and East European Studies at the University of Michigan. Without their financial support, I would not have been able to complete the program. I also want to thank the Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture in New York, the Ronald and Eileen Weiser Foundation in Ann Arbor, the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research in New York, and the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC for their grants.
    [Show full text]
  • Strana 1 Z 15 ZMLUVA O ZRIADENÍ SPOLOČNÉHO OBECNÉHO ÚRADU
    ZMLUVA O ZRIADENÍ SPOLOČNÉHO OBECNÉHO ÚRADU (ďalej len „zmluva“) Účastníci zmluvy: 1. Mesto Leopoldov Hlohovecká cesta 104/2, 920 41 Leopoldov IČO: 312 703 Bankové spojenie: VÚB Trnava, expozitúra Leopoldov Číslo účtu: SK15 0200 0000 0000 2722 3212 Zastúpené: Mgr. Terézia Kavuliaková, primátor 2. Obec Bojničky Bojničky 90, 920 55 Bojničky IČO: 312 274 Bankové spojenie: VÚB, a. s. Číslo účtu: SK47 0200 0000 0016 1026 8359 Zastúpené: Ing. Igor Bojnanský, starosta 3. Obec Červeník Kalinčiakova 26, 920 42 Červeník IČO: 312 355 Bankové spojenie: VÚB, a.s . Číslo účtu: SK09 0200 0000 0000 0202 6212 Zastúpené: Marián Mihálik, starosta 4. Obec Dolné Otrokovce Dolné Otrokovce 44, 920 61 Dolné Otrokovce IČO: 312 428 Bankové spojenie: Slovenská sporiteľňa Číslo účtu: SK90 0900 0000 0050 2449 9152 Zastúpené: Ján Maršála, starosta 5. Obec Dolné Zelenice Dolné Zelenice 107, 920 52 Siladice IČO: 653 942 Bankové spojenie: VÚB Hlohovec Číslo účtu: SK97 0200 0000 0000 2422 5212 Zastúpené: Mgr.Dagmar Jakubcová, starosta 6. Obec Dvorníky Dvorníky 428, 920 56 Dvorníky IČO: 312 495 Bankové spojenie: VÚB, a. s. Číslo účtu: SK30 0200 0000 0000 0412 8212 Zastúpené: Mgr. Ľuboš Gubáň, starosta Strana 1 z 15 7. Obec Horné Otrokovce Horné Otrokovce 146, 920 62 Horné Otrokovce IČO: 312 541 Bankové spojenie: Prima Banka a. s., pobočka Hlohovec Číslo účtu: SK28 5600 0000 0052 4207 3002 Zastúpené: Mgr. Eva Kukučková, starosta 8. Obec Horné Trhovište Horné Trhovište 73, 920 66 Horné Trhovište IČO: 682 152 Bankové spojenie: VÚB a. s. Číslo účtu: SK82 0200 0000 0000 2442 8212 Zastúpené: Ing. Tibor Veľký, starosta 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The EIA Report of V1 NPP Decommissioning
    Jadrová vyraďovacia spoločnosť, a.s. Environmental Impact Assessment Report of V1 NPP Decommissioning 2006 The EIA Report of V1 NPP Decommissioning TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS...........................................................................................................................................9 DEFINITIONS AND TERMS .......................................................................................................................................12 PART A............................................................................................................................................................................17 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................................17 I. BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPONENT..................................................................................19 I.1 NAME ..................................................................................................................................................19 I.2 IDENTIFICATION NUMBER.............................................................................................................19 I.3 ADDRESS............................................................................................................................................19 I.4 PROPONENT REPRESENTATIVES..................................................................................................19 II. BASIC DATA ON
    [Show full text]
  • Annex D – Bratislava
    Action 3.1: Mapping ongoing public and private investments 1 INFORMATION – DANUBE REGION (BRATISLAVA, NITRA, NOVÉ ZÁMKY, ŠURANY, GALANTA) 2 1.1 Bratislava 2 1.2 Nitra 2 1.3 Šurany 2 1.4 Galanta 3 1.5 Nové Zámky 3 2 DESCRIPTION OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PROVIDED IN THE HUB AND LEGAL BACKGROUND 3 3 MAPPING OF ONGOING AND PLANNED INVESTMENTS 8 1 1 Information – Danube region (Bratislava, Nitra, Nové Zámky, Šurany, Galanta) 1.1 Bratislava Bratislava is the capital of Slovakia and, with a population of about 460,000, the countrys largest city. Bratislava is in southwestern Slovakia on both banks of the Danube River and on the left bank of Morava river. Bordering Austria and Hungary, it is the only national capital that borders two independent countries. Bratislava is the political, cultural, and economic centre of Slovakia. It is the seat of the Slovak president, the parliament, and the Slovak executive. It is home to several universities, museums, theatres, galleries and other important cultural and educational institutions. Many of Slovakia's large businesses and financial institutions also have headquarters there. As a rail hub, the city has direct connections to Austria, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland, Germany and the rest of Slovakia. Petržalka and Bratislava Hlavná stanica are the main stations. Other Stations and railway stops are Bratislava- Nové Mesto, Bratislava-Vinohrady, Bratislava-Poddunajské Biskupice, Bratislava-Železná Studienka, Bratislava-Lamač and Bratislava-Vajnory. All stations are mutually accessible by public transport. Main station is located at the northern edge of the Old Town, near Šancová street, some 15 minutes walking from the city center.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report on Achievements of Cohesion Policy: Slovakia
    ISMERI EUROPA EXPERT EVALUATION NETWORK DELIVERING POLICY ANALYSIS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF COHESION POLICY 2007-2013 TASK 2: COUNTRY REPORT ON ACHIEVEMENTS OF COHESION POLICY SLOVAKIA VERSION: FINAL DATE: NOVEMBER 2010 KAROL FRANK INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH – SLOVAK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES A report to the European Commission Directorate-General Regional Policy Expert Evaluation Network Task 2: Country Report on Achievements of Cohesion Policy Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................3 SECTION 1 - SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT ...................................................................4 SECTION 2 - THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY PURSUED, THE EU CONTRIBUTION TO THIS AND THE POLICY ACHIEVEMENTS OVER THE PERIOD.............................................9 SECTION 3 - EFFECTS OF INTERVENTION....................................................................17 SECTION 4 – EVALUATIONS AND GOOD PRACTICE IN EVALUATION .............................18 SECTION 5 - CONCLUDING REMARKS – FUTURE CHALLENGES .....................................24 REFERENCES...............................................................................................................25 INTERVIEWS ...............................................................................................................26 TABLE........................................................................................................................26 Slovakia, final version November 2010 2 of 26 Expert
    [Show full text]
  • 00 312 703 Bankové Spojenie: VÚB Trnava, Expozitúra Leopoldov Číslo Účtu: SK15 0200 0000 0000 2722 3212 Zastúpené: Mgr
    DODATOK č. 1 ZMLUVY O ZRIADENÍ SPOLOČNÉHO OBECNÉHO ÚRADU Účastníci zmluvy: 1. Mesto Leopoldov Hlohovská cesta 104/2, 920 41 Leopoldov IČO: 00 312 703 Bankové spojenie: VÚB Trnava, expozitúra Leopoldov Číslo účtu: SK15 0200 0000 0000 2722 3212 Zastúpené: Mgr. Terézia Kavuliaková, primátor 2. Obec Bojničky Bojničky 90, 920 55 Bojničky IČO: 312 274 Bankové spojenie: VÚB, a. s. Číslo účtu: SK47 0200 0000 0016 1026 8359 Zastúpená: Ing. Igor Bojnanský, starosta 3. Obec Červeník Kalinčiakova 26, 920 42 Červeník IČO: 312 355 Bankové spojenie: VÚB, a.s . Číslo účtu: SK09 0200 0000 0000 0202 6212 Zastúpená: Marián Mihálik, starosta 4. Obec Dolné Otrokovce Dolné Otrokovce 44, 920 61 Dolné Otrokovce IČO: 312 428 Bankové spojenie: Slovenská sporiteľňa Číslo účtu: SK90 0900 0000 0050 2449 9152 Zastúpená: Ján Maršála, starosta 5. Obec Dolné Zelenice Dolné Zelenice 107, 920 52 Siladice IČO: 653 942 Bankové spojenie: VÚB Hlohovec Číslo účtu: SK97 0200 0000 0000 2422 5212 Zastúpená: Mgr.Dagmar Jakubcová, starosta 6. Obec Dvorníky Dvorníky 428, 920 56 Dvorníky IČO: 312 495 Bankové spojenie: VÚB, a. s. Číslo účtu: SK30 0200 0000 0000 0412 8212 Zastúpená: Mgr. Ľuboš Gubáň, starosta Strana 1 z 5 7. Obec Horné Otrokovce Horné Otrokovce 146, 920 62 Horné Otrokovce IČO: 312 541 Bankové spojenie: Prima Banka a. s., pobočka Hlohovec Číslo účtu: SK28 5600 0000 0052 4207 3002 Zastúpená: Mgr. Eva Kukučková, starosta 8. Obec Horné Trhovište Horné Trhovište 73, 920 66 Horné Trhovište IČO: 682 152 Bankové spojenie: VÚB a. s. Číslo účtu: SK82 0200 0000 0000 2442 8212 Zastúpená: Ing. Tibor Veľký, starosta 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Číslo Materiálu: 12 MESTO HLOHOVEC Materiál Na Rokovanie
    Číslo materiálu: 12 MESTO HLOHOVEC Materiál na rokovanie Mestského zastupiteľstva mesta Hlohovec dňa 29. 6. 2016 ___________________________________________________________________________ Názov materiálu: Koncepcia rozvoja mestského regiónu Hlohovec Materiál obsahuje: dôvodovú správu Návrh na uznesenie: Mestské zastupiteľstvo mesta Hlohovec po prerokovaní berie na vedomie Koncepciu rozvoja mestského regiónu Hlohovec. Predkladá: Ing. Miroslav Kollár, primátor Mesta Hlohovec .......................................... Spracoval: Ing. Viktor Nižňanský, PhD. doc. Ing. Silvia Ručinská, PhD. Odbor stratégie, rozvoja mesta a územného plánovania V Hlohovci, 22. 06. 2016 KOMUNÁLNE VÝSKUMNÉ A PORADENSKÉ CENTRUM , N.O. PIEŠŤANY© Mestský región Hlohovec Spolupráca, spoločné verejné politiky, spoločné zabezpečovanie služieb apríl 2016 Správa sumarizuje zistenia z regiónu Hlohovec. Definuje, podľa autorov, hlavné problémy územia a poskytuje, aj vo väzbe na očakávané trendy, námety na projekty v oblasti ekonomického rozvoja, spravovania územia a spolupráce obcí v mestskom regióne. Výstup je súčasťou projektu, ktorý pre Úniu miest Slovenska realizuje Komunálne výskumné a poradenské centrum, n. o. Piešťany s názvom „Spolupráca obcí v mestskom regióne“ a ktorého cieľom je snaha o presadenie myšlienky intenzívnejšej spolupráce jadrového mesta regiónu a obcí v ňom. Autori© Viktor Nižňanský – Silvia Ručinská ISBN 978-80-972006-8-8 Prvé vydanie Neprešlo jazykovou úpravou Toto dielo, ani jeho časť, sa nesmie reprodukovať bez súhlasu autorov Táto publikácia vyšla ako záverečný výstup grantu, ktorý poskytla Únia miest Slovenska Komunálnemu výskumnému a poradenskému centru Piešťany n. o. Spolupráca obcí v mestskom regióne Hlohovec strana 2 Obsah 1. Dôvody, zámer a ciele vypracovania projektu 4 2. Metodológia a vymedzenie mestského regiónu Hlohovec 10 3. Profil skúmaného územia 15 4. Reakcia na očakávané trendy 17 5. Odporúčania 21 Príloha - Zhrnutie súčasného stavu 34 Spolupráca obcí v mestskom regióne Hlohovec strana 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL ANALYSIS of CHALLENGES and NEEDS for Bratislava Region
    REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF CHALLENGES AND NEEDS for Bratislava Region Version 1.4 D.T1.2.6 30 04 2020 Institute of Spatial Planning (IPP) CORCAP partner(s) Related catchment area (area of analysis) Related cross-border relations IPP Bratislavský kraj, Trnavský kraj, Nitriansky kraj CZ-SK, SK-AT, HU-SK Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CURRENT SITUATION ANALYSIS ................................................................ 5 1.1. Geographical and socio-economic description of the area, delimitation and definition of its catchment area .......................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1. Identifying the corridor and determining its catchment area ................................................. 7 1.1.2. Connections with relevant TEN-T and RFC corridors in the area ............................................. 8 1.1.2.1. TEN-T corridors ................................................................................................... 8 1.1.2.2. Multimodal Transport Corridors ............................................................................... 9 1.1.2.3. AGC railways ...................................................................................................... 10 1.1.2.4. AGTC corridors ................................................................................................... 11 1.1.2.5. Railway freight corridors ...................................................................................... 13 1.1.2.6. Other corridors .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]