367 Trich Feathers, and Horns. Instead, the Areas North of Nǁuis Were Said
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Who Were the Ancestors of the Namibian !Xoon? 367 trich feathers, and horns. Instead, the areas north of point worth consideration is that, also in the first Nǁuis were said to have been occupied by other San decade of the 20th century, the German colonial groups, namely Naro, Haiǁom, and Gainǂaman. The government run a model settlement scheme for few Taa speakers who nowadays live at the commu- Bushmen at Oas with the intention to slowly adapt nal area of Tjaka Ben Hur, which is located only a them to a sedentary lifestyle and farm labor (NAN few farms west of Tsachas, came there during the 1911–1913). However, old !Xoon claimed that they past four decades either together with their Tswana had nothing to do with that scheme and that they patrons or after a career as farm laborers in order only heard about Koukou (ǂKx‘au-ǁen) people be- to live with the relatives of their spouses. Several ing settled there while their own parents had kept reasons might account for the fact that Bleek met away from it out of fear (interviews with SM, JT, Taa speakers as far north as Tsachas and Uichenas. and JK, 06. 02. 2006 and 13. 02. 2006). This seems First, Tsachas is located on the Chapman’s River to be confirmed by Rudolf Pöch, who traveled in in the immediate neighborhood of Oas,9 an impor- Southern Africa between 1907 and 1909 and who tant station on the 19th-century trade routes from reported that two San groups were living at Oas: the south along the Nossob River and from the the Hei//um (Haiǁom), who spoke Nama, and the west coast through Gobabis to Lake Ngami in Bo- ǂAunin (ǂKx‘au-ǁen) who spoke their own language tswana. During the second half of the 19th century, (Pöch 1908–1909: 2; quoted in Hirsch berg 1936: 1). these routes were controlled by the Lambert Oorlam Rather than to the north, oral accounts point to 10 (also GaiǀKhauan or Amraals). They had moved areas further south of Aminuis as place of origin the Nossob upstream from the south in the first half of Namibian !Xoon. This calls for turning attention of the 19th century. The trade route probably attract- towards areas as far south as the lower reaches of ed people from all population groups in the wider the Auob and Nossob Rivers down to its pass over area. Bleek herself stated that the trade route went the border and into what is nowadays the Kgalagadi through an area, which lay at the intersection of the Transfrontier Park of Botswana and South Africa. settlement areas of the Naro, the ǂKx‘au-ǁen, and The reasons for this considerable southward exten- 11 the Nǀu-san or !Xoon (1927: 63). A second point sion are a) !Xoon oral accounts claiming that their in case is the fact that farm allocations to settlers ancestors originate from the south, and b) that both, along the Chapman’s River date from as early as the the oral and the written record suggest that terri- first decade of the 20th century (Mendelsohn 2002: tories occupied by Taa speakers and their southern 134, see also Map 2). The Taa speakers which Bleek neighbors were partly overlapping, if not synchron- met at Tsachas and Uichenas, thus, might also have ically, at least diachronically. The oldest !Xoon man been farm laborers attracted by work opportunities living in Namibia and one of the main informants on or recruited by force who must not necessarily have oral history reported that his people originated from lived there before. In her publications, Bleek does the south. Although he was not able to provide more not provide further details about the background of detailed information, he mentioned the Auob River the Taa speakers she met at these places.12 A third and once even the name Karoo, i.e., a stretch of land even further south in South Africa. The lower reach- 9 Tsachas, Oas, and Uichenas are place names of Khoekhoe es of the Auob and Nossob Rivers are usually at- origin. For Oas (also Twass, ǀOas) see Nienaber and Raper tributed to the linguistically closest relatives of the (1980: 396), for Uichenas (also !Uicha-!nas, !Uixa!nas) see Nienaber and Raper (1980: 1080). The name Tsachas (also !Xoon, called ǀ‘Auni or S4 (Southern Khoisan 4) by Zachas) is not to be found in Nienaber and Raper’s encyclo- pedia of Khoekhoe place names. The ending -s, however, is (n. d.: Book BC151_A3_010: 19) and the speakers of S6 to typical for Khoekhoe place names. have originated from Aminuis and come to Uichenas together 10 “Oorlam” are those Khoekhoe-speaking people who migrat- with their Tswana masters (18). On the other hand, she noted ed from the south to what nowadays are the southern and cen- that “some of Balzer’s Bushmen” had lived at Uichenas before tral parts of Namibian national territory as a consequence of the Tswana came to Uichenas six years earlier “when the the colonial expansion in South Africa. English took Gobabis” (19). Balzer was the owner of Tsachas 11 A map in Schinz (1891) shows one route leaving the Nos- (NAN 1898–1915). It is unclear what Bleek means by “Bal- sob at Wesleyvalle (Leonardville) and leading through the zer’s sort of Bushmen” since under the heading Tsaxas Kalahari via ǁNuis (Nǁuis, Otjewe), ǂAroroams (Aroroams), (Tsachas) she lists the names of several San groups includ- !Uixa!nas (Uichenas) to ǀOas (Oas). It also shows a side route ing the “!kxonate,” “ǀnu ǁen,” “ǁyauǁein,” (ǂKx‘au-ǁen ?), running through !Hũ-!gũis (Hugus) and !Gubu-!oms (Gubu- “Heiǁ‘umate“and “!xore = Naron“ (Bleek and Lloyd Collec- oms), i.e., the area which was claimed to be their traditional tion n. d.: Book BC151_A3_010: 3). Her notes further state territory by present-day !Xoon. that !kxo (!Xoon) were living further south “around the Nos- 12 According to the information in one of her notebooks re- sop” at Naosanabis (Nǁaosanabis) and Hoakus keis (Hou- cently published as part of “The Digital Bleek and Lloyd gousgeis), and the Nǀu-ǁen eastwards from Uichenas up to Collection” (Bleek and Lloyd Collection n. d.), the area of beyond Naunas, i.e., in Botswana. The !Xoon and Nǀu-ǁen Uichenas once seems to have been inhabited by Naro only are said to speak one language and understand each other (3). Anthropos 107.2012 https://doi.org/10.5771/0257-9774-2012-2-367 Generiert durch IP '170.106.35.229', am 28.09.2021, 00:14:38. Das Erstellen und Weitergeben von Kopien dieses PDFs ist nicht zulässig. 368 Gertrud E. Boden Map 2: The expansion of the commercial farms (illustration based on Mendelsohn 2002). A version of this map originally appeared in Boden (2007: 14). Dorothea Bleek (1929: 1). Almost nothing is known Bleek (1937: 195), the group was composed of “the about the fate of the ǀ‘Auni except that in 1936 some ǂKhomani, the ǀ‘Auni, the ǀNamani who had been of them lived in the camp of Donald Bain, “the well- living among the Nama and only spoke the Nama known South African explorer and big game hunter” language, and a few women of the Khatia or Vaal- (Maingard 1937a: v), at Tweerivie ren on the con- pens tribe who had married ǀ‘Auni and ǀNamani fluence of the two rivers and the current location of men.” The ǀ‘Auni group joined the camp later (Doke the southern entrance gate of the Kgalagadi Trans- 1937: 98 f.). They were reported to have been resi- frontier Park. From there Bain brought them to the dent in the Gemsbok Game Reserve and to have had Empire Exhibition in Johannesburg. Both at Twee- close contact with the Nama under Simon Kooper rivie ren and Johannesburg they were studied by an further north (Maingard 1937b: 237). According to interdisciplinary team of researchers (Rheinallt and Doke 1937; see also Gordon 1999).13 According to language, yet … a step nearer to the Central Bushman Group, which means that it is nearer to the Hottentot tongues.” The ǂKhomani speak a language of the !Ui branch of the Tuu fam- 13 Bleek (1937: 195) classified theǀ ‘Auni language as belong- ily, known under the name Nǀuu and only spoken by a hand- ing to the Southern Group and “somewhat like the ǂKhomani ful of speakers today (cf. Nǀuu 2009). Anthropos 107.2012 https://doi.org/10.5771/0257-9774-2012-2-367 Generiert durch IP '170.106.35.229', am 28.09.2021, 00:14:38. Das Erstellen und Weitergeben von Kopien dieses PDFs ist nicht zulässig. Who Were the Ancestors of the Namibian !Xoon? 369 Steyn (1984: 117) who visited the “descendants” of 3 A Rough Historical Sketch the attendants of the Empire Exhibition at Johan- nesburg in Twee rivie ren, in 1982 and 1983, one of During the early years of the 19th century the coun- them, a man called Regopstaan or !Amg!aub was try east of the Nossob River was inhabited by San born near Gochas, the former headquarters of Simon groups who probably belonged to the Central (Khoe) Kooper in Namibia and identified himself as ǂOm- and Southern Khoisan (Tuu) language families as a ni (ǂKhomani). According to oral accounts also well as by groups of Kgalagadi (Köhler 1959a: 60). 17 !Xoon and ’Nǀoha were in Simon Kooper’s group Köh ler dates the arrival of the Kgalagadi in the (e.g., interview with SP, 01. 05. 2005, Corridor 21; Aminuis area back to the 18th century.18 In the first interview with HK, 22.