Global Geospatial Information Management in Africa Action Plan 2016 - 2030

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Geospatial Information Management in Africa Action Plan 2016 - 2030 Global Geospatial Information Management in Africa Action Plan 2016 - 2030 A Call for action to strengthen and sustain national geospatial information systems and infrastructures in a coordinated manner United Nations Economic Commission for Africa ___________________ Geoinformation & UNWGIC Spatial Statistics Deqinq, China ___________________ 21 November 2018 Andre Nonguierma Outlines UN-GGIM Context Why we need Geography? UN-GGIM : African Holistic Geospatial information Vision At its July 2011 substantive The Policy Drivers : Global Need for Spatially- Coordinated approach for cooperative management of session, following extensive Enabled Complex Information Everything that happens, happens somewhere geospatial information that adopts common regional consultation with geospatial standards, frameworks and tools over space and time experts of Member States, the Management of global geospatial information to address 80% of all human decisions involve a “Where?” Economic and Social Council key global challenges including Sustainable development, question climate change, disaster management, peace and (ECOSOC) considered the report You cannot count what you cannot locate security, and environmental stresses of the Secretary General Location affects nearly everything we do in life. Intergovernmental Process where the Member States play (E/2011/89) and adopted a the key role resolution to create the United . Nations Committee of Experts on Geography Nexus Issues Key Pillars Way Forward Global Geospatial Information Availability Key Pillars Policy : Institutional Finding the appropriate information at the mechanisms.. aligned with Management (2011/24). required time and at the relevant scale of SDI : Frameworks with related national efforts, while taking http://ggim.un.org/about.html. aggregation. policies & structures into account international Accessibility perspectives The United Nations Global Even where information is available, it may not be FDS : Fundamental Geospatial Data democracy : Ubiquitous easily accessible, either because of the lack of Datasets availability of relevant spatial Geospatial Information technology for effective access or because of data/information as common Management (UN-GGIM) associated costs AFREF : African Geodetic goods. Adhering to agreed Transformability Reference Frame standards : metadata, data initiative was established to There is a general lack of infrastructure capacities models, encoding, create a formal geospatial for the collection and assessment of data, for their SALB : Second Administrative interoperability transformation into useful information and for their Level Boundaries People : High Level Education information coordination dissemination. to empower African youth in Governance GeoNyms : Geographic Names geospatial science and mechanism involving Member technology culture at all There is also need for improved coordination Geo-Stats : Locate & Count States as the key stakeholders. among environmental, demographic, social and education levels (schools, developmental data information, applications universities) and services. Geospatial Information Management in Africa: Key Messages ▪ Africa making its own marks in the geospatial arena ▪ If you think you're too small to make a difference you haven't spent a night with a mosquito. ▪ Putting Africa First ▪ Until the lion has his or her own storyteller, the hunter will always have the best part of the story ▪ New Business standards: Collective approach to implementing key initiatives ▪ Wisdom is like a baobab tree; no one individual can embrace it Geospatial Information Management in Africa A Continued Vision… ▪ Coordinated approach for cooperative management of geospatial information that 2017 adopts common regional UN-GGIM Africa standards, frameworks and 2015 tools UN-GGIM • Action Plan Phased Approach Phased • Strategy for integration GIS & Stats ▪ Management of global • 8/2015 - UN-GGIM-4 Resolution 5/112 geospatial information to • Endorsed the formal establishment of the Regional address key global challenges 2013 Committee of UN-GGIM: Africa and welcomed CODIST UNECA as the Regional Committee’s Secretariat including Sustainable development, climate change, • Recommends that the oversight and supervisory functions of the geoinformation disaster management, peace subcommittee of CODIST be transferred to an and security, and 2001 equivalent subcommittee of StatCom Africa CODI.II with the name of GGIM-Africa. environmental stresses ▪ Intergovernmental Process • 2001 – CODI.II • Resolution urging Member States to adopt where the Member States play National Spatial Data Infrastructures the key role (NSDI) and Regional SDI (ARSDI) Time The African Action Plan : Holistic Geospatial information Vision Geospatial Inform. for Sustainable Development (Gi4SD) in Africa Collective approach to addressing key global challenges Partnerships Networks Strategy Training Regional Collaboration Capacities Spatial awareness High Level Education Core thematic Common Tools Cooperative management Open and Free Standards Data Informed decisions The African Action Plan : Based on African Contemporary Issues and Challenges Core Data : 2.5 % of the Continent is Poor Mapping Mapped at 1/25.000 Coverage (Europe: 86.9% ; Russia : Lack of 100%) consistency Frameworks & Poor Interoperability Tools : Lack of Standardisation Non codified rules for data access Applications: Several applications build Duplication of repetitively the same efforts datasets Data are not publicized Capacity : Critical mass. Recognition & Turnover Retention of Professionals Governance: Redundancies in Lack of initiatives. Coordination Inadequacy The African Action Plan : Logic of Intervention ▪ The Vision of GI4SD for Strategic Objective Focus Areas the 2030 horizon on Policy and Governance 1). Geospatial information management is adopted as a critical development the African continent enabler by member States in Africa is "Advancing Africa’s 2). A specific geospatial information policy is in force in every member State Sustainable 3). Policy action to ensure integration of geospatial and statistical information. Development Agenda through Common framework, 1). Action to use geospatial information for the attainment of the SDGs and Fundamental Datasets, Agenda 2063 targets sound Geospatial Tools, Standards, Services 2). A high-quality ground-level infrastructure for geospatial information Information production Management". 3). Fundamental data sets, metadata and geospatial standards are ▪ The Mission Statement developed with related geoportals and online services of GI4SD in Africa is as 4). Private sector is involved in the geospatial information management follows: Africa (Funding) Capacity development 1). Development of institutional, Infrastructural and Individual capacity Produces and Uses and knowledge transfer Authoritative and 2). Building spatial awareness (critical mass of spatially-aware citizens) Evidence-Based International coordination, Operations are based on United Nations project and programme Geospatial And cooperation in management rules. Information for the meeting global needs Attainment of its Integration of geospatial Design a National Statistical Spatial Framework for the integration of Sustainable information and statistics geospatial and statistical information Development Goals Advocacy to ensure policy-level engagement and user commitment to and Agenda 2063 employ the NSSF objectives. Geospatial information technology is mainstreamed (all the way through training, data and processes) into national statistics offices activities in Africa The Business Model ▪ Coordinated Phased Approach process that adopts common Governance Structures Plans Actions Monitoring regional standards, frameworks and tools ▪ Addressing key global challenges Interim Bureau Working Groups People SMART Goals & Success Criteria GI4SD including Policies Related Actions Sustainable Technicalities development, climate change, disaster 2015 2017 2018 2014 2016 Time management, peace and Continental security, and Linkages with Response to global Framework Delivery of services, international challenges Benchmarking environmental decisions & activities stresses Governance & Administrative Arrangement ▪ Executive Board ▪ Chair: Senegal ▪ 1st Vice-Chair: Botswana ▪ 2nd Vice-Chair: Algeria Algeria Cameroon ▪ 1st Rapporteur: Senegeal Cameroon Uganda ▪ 2nd Rapporteur: Botswana Uganda ▪ Secretariat: Economic Commission for Africa The African Action Plan : Mechanisms & Frameworks ▪ UN-GGIM:Africa Working Chair Members No UN-GGIM Asia- UN-GGIM Group Voting UN-GGIM Africa UN-GGIM Americas UN-GGIM Europe Pacific Arab States Member Pillars (2015) (2013) (2014) (2018) (2012) (2014) s ▪ SDI : Frameworks Madagascar WG1: African 2. Burkina Faso Nigeria Japan SEN, Saudi Arabia Mexico Sweden Geodetic 3. Morocco Senegal with related policies ROK/Mongolia BTW, ALG, CAM, Algeria Chile Netherlands/ 1. Kenya South Africa China UGA, ECA Jordan Mexico EuroGeographics Reference 4. Botswana AFRIGIST & structures Frame 5. Cameroon RCMRD UNECA WG 1 WG 1 Geodetic Côte d’Ivoire ▪ FDS : Fundamental Geodetic WG WG European WG2: 2. Cameroon infrastructure Institutional, Madagascar Reference Frame NSDI Commission Fundamental 3. South Sudan Standards Legal, Policy + Eurostat 1. South Mali Geospatial Datasets for SD Geo spatial 4. Burkina Faso Niger Africa datasets and 5. Algeria Nigeria Senegal ▪ AFREF : African WG 2 WG 2 Standards WG WG UNECA Data Sharing & Fundamental Euro Fundamental Data Integration Burkina Faso Geodetic
Recommended publications
  • The Gordian Knot: Apartheid & the Unmaking of the Liberal World Order, 1960-1970
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: APARTHEID & THE UNMAKING OF THE LIBERAL WORLD ORDER, 1960-1970 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Ryan Irwin, B.A., M.A. History ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Peter Hahn Professor Robert McMahon Professor Kevin Boyle Professor Martha van Wyk © 2010 by Ryan Irwin All rights reserved. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the apartheid debate from an international perspective. Positioned at the methodological intersection of intellectual and diplomatic history, it examines how, where, and why African nationalists, Afrikaner nationalists, and American liberals contested South Africa’s place in the global community in the 1960s. It uses this fight to explore the contradictions of international politics in the decade after second-wave decolonization. The apartheid debate was never at the center of global affairs in this period, but it rallied international opinions in ways that attached particular meanings to concepts of development, order, justice, and freedom. As such, the debate about South Africa provides a microcosm of the larger postcolonial moment, exposing the deep-seated differences between politicians and policymakers in the First and Third Worlds, as well as the paradoxical nature of change in the late twentieth century. This dissertation tells three interlocking stories. First, it charts the rise and fall of African nationalism. For a brief yet important moment in the early and mid-1960s, African nationalists felt genuinely that they could remake global norms in Africa’s image and abolish the ideology of white supremacy through U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unfinished Journey William Minter
    An Unfinished Journey William Minter he early morning phone call came on Febru- 1973; Patrice Lumumba in 1961; Malcolm X in 1965; ary 4, 1969, the day after I arrived back from Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968; Steve Biko in 1977; Tanzania to my parents’ house in Tucson, Ruth First in 1982; and Samora Machel in 1986—to Arizona. “Eduardo has been assassinated.” name only a few. TThe caller was Gail Hovey, one of the co-editors Memories of those who gave their lives can bind of this book. She was then working with the South- together and inspire those who carry on their lega- ern Africa Committee in New York, a group sup- cies. So can highly visible public victories, such as porting liberation movements in Mozambique and the dramatic release of Nelson Mandela from prison other Southern African countries. Eduardo, as he in February 1990 and the first democratic election was known to hundreds of friends around the world, in South Africa in April 1994. The worldwide anti- was Eduardo Mondlane. At the time of his death by apartheid movement, which helped win those victo- a letter bomb, he was president of the Mozambique ries, was arguably the most successful transnational Liberation Front, known as Frelimo. Had he lived to social movement of the last half century. All of us see the freedom of his country, he would likely have engaged in this book project were minor actors in joined his contemporary and friend Nelson Mandela that movement, and our roles will become clear as as one of Africa’s most respected leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Notes on Africa, Jan. 1969
    Washington notes on Africa, Jan. 1969 http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.acoa000001 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org Washington notes on Africa, Jan. 1969 Alternative title Washington notes on Africa Author/Creator American Committee on Africa (ACOA) Contributor Gappert, Gary Publisher American Committee on Africa (ACOA) Date 1969-01 Resource type Newsletters Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) South Africa, United States, Nigeria Coverage (temporal) 1968 - 1969 Source Africa Action Archive Rights By kind permission of Africa Action, incorporating the American Committee on Africa, The Africa Fund, and the Africa Policy Information Center.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly 5 August 2016
    United Nations A/RES/70/293 Distr.: General General Assembly 5 August 2016 Seventieth session Agenda item 15 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 July 2016 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/70/L.49/Rev.1)] 70/293. Third Industrial Development Decade for Africa (2016–2025) The General Assembly, Recalling its resolution 35/66 B of 5 December 1980, in which it proclaimed the 1980s as the first Industrial Development Decade for Africa, its resolution 44/237 of 22 December 1989, in which it proclaimed the period 1991–2000 as the Second Industrial Development Decade for Africa, its resolution 47/177 of 22 December 1992, in which it adjusted the period for the programme for the Second Decade to cover the years 1993–2002, and its resolution 57/297 of 20 December 2002 on the Second Decade, Recalling also its resolution 70/1 of 25 September 2015, entitled “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, which reflects the importance of industrial development to the 2030 Agenda, including Sustainable Development Goal 9, Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation, and its interrelated targets, Recalling further its resolution 69/313 of 27 July 2015 on the Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development, which is an integral part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, supports and complements it and helps to contextualize its means of implementation targets with concrete policies and actions,
    [Show full text]
  • Struggle for Liberation in South Africa and International Solidarity A
    STRUGGLE FOR LIBERATION IN SOUTH AFRICA AND INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY A Selection of Papers Published by the United Nations Centre against Apartheid Edited by E. S. Reddy Senior Fellow, United Nations Institute for Training and Research STERLING PUBLISHERS PRIVATE LIMITED NEW DELHI 1992 INTRODUCTION One of the essential contributions of the United Nations in the international campaign against apartheid in South Africa has been the preparation and dissemination of objective information on the inhumanity of apartheid, the long struggle of the oppressed people for their legitimate rights and the development of the international campaign against apartheid. For this purpose, the United Nations established a Unit on Apartheid in 1967, renamed Centre against Apartheid in 1976. I have had the privilege of directing the Unit and the Centre until my retirement from the United Nations Secretariat at the beginning of 1985. The Unit on Apartheid and the Centre against Apartheid obtained papers from leaders of the liberation movement and scholars, as well as eminent public figures associated with the international anti-apartheid movements. A selection of these papers are reproduced in this volume, especially those dealing with episodes in the struggle for liberation; the role of women, students, churches and the anti-apartheid movements in the resistance to racism; and the wider significance of the struggle in South Africa. I hope that these papers will be of value to scholars interested in the history of the liberation movement in South Africa and the evolution of United Nations as a force against racism. The papers were prepared at various times, mostly by leaders and active participants in the struggle, and should be seen in their context.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. INTRODUCTION “ Unless Something New and Radical Is Done
    1. INTRODUCTION “ Unless something new and radical is done, Africa will not achieve the International Development Goals (IDGs) and the 7% annual Growth Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate” 1 The New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) is not only the newest and most fashionable game on the African continent, but also the latest in the efforts by African political leaders to deal collectively with the countless national, regional and continental political, socioeconomic problems and development challenges facing the continent. As much as a growing number of African political leaders enter the arena to declare their commitment to the agenda of Africa’s economic upliftment in the new millennium, there is very little civil society understanding of and support for a continental project such as NEPAD. The absence of meaningful and organic participation by civil society is the most vexatious of all the concerns that could mar the otherwise commendable vision of African sustainable development that NEPAD invokes. It is this absence of participation by civil society in the lives of their communities that has led to the failure of most commendable projects undertaken by African leaders since the early days of independence. In the words of the NEPAD document, what is now known as NEPAD is a merger of the Millennium Partnership for Africa’s Recovery Programme (MAP) and the Omega Plan. This was finalised into a new document and framework called the New Africa Initiative, (NAI) on 3 July 2001 in Lusaka, Zambia. The NAI was then approved by OAU Summit Heads of State and Government on 11 July 2001 (Declaration 1 (XXXVII)).
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with George Houser
    Interview with George Houser "It was George Houser who introduced me to people who supported the African anti-colonial struggle. ... All of us who came to the United Nations or the United States during our campaigning for independence received help and encouragement from the ACOA." — Mwalimu Julius K. Nyerere, in the foreword to George M. Houser, No One Can Stop the Rain[1] "We always conceived our work as part and parcel of the civil rights struggle. ... The struggle in Africa was to us, as Americans, an extension of the battle on the home front." — George M. Houser, " The Struggle Never Ends," October 2003[2] Introduction For three decades, from the early 1950s through the 1970s, George Houser was the American name most familiar to leaders of African liberation movements seeking sympathetic contacts in the unfamiliar and generally unsympathetic context of Cold War America. This was not because the American Committee on Africa (ACOA, pronounced A-C-O- A), the organization he headed for those years, was large, powerful, or well known, or because it had access to the corridors of power. Nor was Houser himself a public figure attracting media attention. It was simply because they could count on Houser being there, and doing what he could. Born in 1916 in Ohio, Houser grew up first in the Philippines, where his parents were Methodist missionaries, and then in New York state, California, and Colorado, where his father was a Methodist pastor. As a student active in the National Council of Methodist Youth in the 1930s, he absorbed the activist message of the Social Gospel, with its strands of pacifism, socialism, support for organized labor, and, above all, opposition to racial discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • GGIM/16/1 20 June 2016
    Distribution: Limited E/ECA/GGIM/16/1 20 June 2016 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL Original: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR AFRICA Global Geospatial Information Management (GGIM) Africa Action Plan Addis Ababa, Ethiopia July 2016 Geospatial Information for Sustainable Development in Africa (GI4SD) African Action Plan on Global Geospatial Information Management (AAP-GGIM) 2016-2030 Last Edition: 14/06/2017 18:08 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United Nations Secretariat has launched the Global Geospatial Information Management (GGIM) initiative in 2011. It aims at setting up a formal mechanism under the UN auspices to discuss and coordinate GGIM activities and by involving Member States as the key players. Two key programmes, namely the United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted in September 2015 by the General Assembly of the UN, and the African Union (AU) Agenda 2063, approved in January 2015 by the African Union, further emphasise the need for a global coordination mechanism for Geospatial Information Management (GIM) These two Agendas have a lot in common and are mutually supportive and coherent, while the Agenda 2063 is more specific on the needs of Africa. At its meeting in April 2016, the Conference of African ministers of finance, planning, economic development and integration highlighted these two Agendas as key to the next phase of Africa’s development and noted the supportive relationship of the two. Geospatial Information for Sustainable Development (GI4SD) in Africa, which is the African Action Plan on Global Geospatial Information Management (AAP-GGIM) is an implementation tool of UN-GGIM: Africa, the African component of the UN-GGIM initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Development, Good Governance and South-South Cooperation: the African Peer Review Mechanism
    CHAPTER 16 Development, good governance and South-South cooperation: the African Peer Review Mechanism Bronwen Manby* 2. States shall have the duty, individually or collectively, to I. Introduction ensure the exercise of the right to development. This chapter analyses the African Peer Review In line with this commitment, for several decades Mechanism (APRM) in the light of the version of the African States have taken an active part in debates criteria to assess development partnerships prepared concerning the strengthening of the concept of the by the high-level task force on the implementation of right to development as an international obligation. the right to development and submitted to the Work- Indeed, the Declaration on the Right to Development ing Group on the Right to Development in 2010 (A/ was adopted in 1986 in large part as a result of Afri- HRC/15/WG.2/TF/2/Add.2). After setting the can support. At the level of the African continent itself, Mechanism in the context of the New Partnership for there is also a more recent commitment to action to Africa’s Development (NEPAD), it examines the nature achieve sustainable development through mobili- and functioning of the Mechanism, explores whether zation of domestic resources and through reform of it is a development partnership, and then focuses on continental and national institutions supporting gov- the content and process of integrating the right to ernance and development. Among the most important development into the Mechanism. initiatives in this regard are the transformation of the Organization of African Unity into the African Union II.
    [Show full text]
  • Boycotts and Sanctions Against South Africa: an International History, 1946-1970
    Boycotts and Sanctions against South Africa: An International History, 1946-1970 Simon Stevens Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2016 Simon Stevens All rights reserved ABSTRACT Boycotts and Sanctions against South Africa: An International History, 1946-1970 Simon Stevens This dissertation analyzes the role of various kinds of boycotts and sanctions in the strategies and tactics of those active in the struggle against apartheid in South Africa. What was unprecedented about the efforts of members of the global anti-apartheid movement was that they experimented with so many ways of severing so many forms of interaction with South Africa, and that boycotts ultimately came to be seen as such a central element of their struggle. But it was not inevitable that international boycotts would become indelibly associated with the struggle against apartheid. Calling for boycotts and sanctions was a political choice. In the years before 1959, most leading opponents of apartheid both inside and outside South Africa showed little interest in the idea of international boycotts of South Africa. This dissertation identifies the conjuncture of circumstances that caused this to change, and explains the subsequent shifts in the kinds of boycotts that opponents of apartheid prioritized. It shows that the various advocates of boycotts and sanctions expected them to contribute to ending apartheid by a range of different mechanisms, from bringing about an evolutionary change in white attitudes through promoting the desegregation of sport, to weakening the state’s ability to resist the efforts of the liberation movements to seize power through guerrilla warfare.
    [Show full text]
  • Program and Purposes of the American Committee on Africa
    Program and purposes of the American Committee on Africa http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.acoa000264 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org Program and purposes of the American Committee on Africa Author/Creator American Committee on Africa Publisher American Committee on Africa Date 1962 Resource type Circulars Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) Africa (region), United States, South Africa Coverage (temporal) 1953 - 1962 Source Africa Action Archive Rights By kind permission of Africa Action, incorporating the American Committee on Africa, The Africa Fund, and the Africa Policy Information Center. Description Program. Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa
    ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 4IR Fourth Industrial Revolution ASGISA Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa AU African Union CNG Compressed natural gas CO2 Carbon dioxide CSIR Council of Scientific and Industrial Research CSO Civil society organization DAFF Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries DBE Department of Basic Education DEA Department of Environmental Affairs DPME Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation DST Department of Science and Technology DTI Department of Trade and Industry DVA Domestic Violence Act GBV Gender-based violence GDP Gross domestic product GEAR Growth, Employment and Redistribution GNP New Growth Path HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus ICT Information and Communication Technology IPAP Industrial Policy Action Plan IPP Independent Power Producer IRP Integrated Resource Plan MOI Means of implementation MTSF Medium Term Strategic Framework NDC Nationally determined contribution NDP National Development Plan NGO Non-governmental organization NPC National Planning Commission NSSD National Strategy for Sustainable Development and Action Plan 1 NWRS National Water Resources Strategy PEP Post-exposure prophylaxis PhD Postgraduate doctoral degree PSET Post-School Education and Training RDP Reconstruction and Development Programme REIPPPP Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers Programme SADC Southern African Development Community SAEON South African Environmental Observation Network SANEDI South African National Energy Development Institute SANBI South African National Biodiversity
    [Show full text]