DOCSLIB.ORG

Tube 150 Exhibition (2013)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tube 150 Exhibition (2013) 150 and Counting: The Development of a Co-ordinated Underground Network for London Transport for London Corporate Archives Online Exhibition TfL Corporate Archives The TfL Corporate Archives acts as the custodian of the corporate memory of TfL and its predecessors, responsible for collecting, conserving, maintaining and providing access to the historical archives of the organisation. These archives chart the development of the organisation and the decision making processes. The Archives provides advice and assistance to researchers from both within and outside of the business and seeks to promote the archive to as wide an audience as possible, while actively collecting both physical material and personal stories to add to the archive. The Archives are part of Information Governance, within General Counsel. Online Exhibition • “150 and Counting: The Development of a Co-ordinated Underground Network for London” is intended as an introduction to the wealth of material collected and managed by the Corporate Archives • The following pages highlight key documents from the collection celebrating 150 years of the Underground in London, arranged according to theme, as well as providing further brief information. These can be used as a starting point for further research if desired • This document is adapted from a guide that originally accompanied an internal exhibition Metropolitan Line • On Saturday 10th January 1863, the Metropolitan Railway Company opened a sub-surface railway between Bishop’s Road, Paddington to Farringdon Street, a distance of 3¾ miles. This was the world’s first passenger underground railway and it was the idea of Charles Pearson, the City of London’s Solicitor, who saw the possibilities of underground travel to relieve the pressure on streets choked with horse-drawn vehicles, and John Hargreave Stevens, who was to become Architect of the Metropolitan Railway. • On the first day the public flocked to the new railway for a novel ride beneath the streets and 30,000 passengers were carried, with £850 of fares passing into the railway’s hands on that first day. • According to The Times newspaper of the following Monday, “Throughout the morning every station became crowded with anxious travellers who were admitted in sections...The platform gained, the next great struggle was for a seat...classification was altogether ignored, the holder of a first-class ticket being compelled to go in number three or not at all, and vice-versa.” LT000016/014 Arms of the Metropolitan Railway Company Metropolitan Line • This pioneer underground railway was constructed by LT001917/001 a “cut and cover” system; Centenary Parade at Neasden the massive brick tunnels were built in huge trenches cut out of the ground and then roofed over. • The railway was eventually extended as far as Buckinghamshire and on 1st July 1933, it was absorbed into the newly created London Passenger Transport Board becoming its Metropolitan Line. • Locomotive No. 23 started hauling passenger trains on the Metropolitan Railway in 1866, three years after the line opened. Affectionately known to drivers as “The Old Girl”, it hauled all kinds of trains, and shunted at depots for 82 years. LT001917/001 Centenary Book of the Metropolitan Railway Company (Metropolitan) District Line • The early success of the Metropolitan Railway coincided with revived activity in the promotion of railway schemes for London, and in 1864 there were 259 different projects for making c. 300 miles of railway in and around London. • Formed in 1864, the Metropolitan District Railway was the Company charged with completing an ‘Inner Circle’ underground for London by the construction of a line from South Kensington to Tower Hill, together with spurs from South Kensington to West Brompton, and Kensington High Street to Addison Road. • The first sod was cut at Kensington on 29 June 1865 and nearly 3,000 men were employed, working for the last month day and night. LT000565/017 A copy of the Act authorising the Metropolitan and Metropolitan and District Railway Companies to make certain railways for completing the Inner Circle and connecting their railways with the East London Railway, as well as creating a new street and certain street improvements. 1879 (Metropolitan) District Line • The first section of the District, from South Kensington to Westminster Bridge, was opened on 24 December 1868. • Under an agreement of 1866, the Metropolitan worked and maintained the District lines as they were opened for traffic. LT001893/006 • The working arrangement became seen as unsatisfactory by the District and a year’s notice was given to terminate it on 1 July 1871. The District company bought its own rolling stock, and built repair shops and sheds at West Brompton, and on 3 July 1871 the District began to work on its own undertaking. • At the end of its working life as a company, the District worked over 58 miles 56 chains of railway, of which it owned 25 miles 5 chains outright, partly owned 1 mile 54 chains, leased or worked jointly a further 5 miles 43 chains, and exercised continuous running powers over 26 miles 34 chains of the lines of other companies, namely, the Metropolitan, Southern, and London Midland Scottish Railway. East London Line • The East London Line is the only Underground line that was planned and built as a mainline railway. • The story of the East London Line begins with the building of the Thames Tunnel. • The Thames Tunnel from Wapping to Rotherhithe was the first tunnel under a river anywhere in the world. It was designed by Marc Brunel using a revolutionary tunnel shield, comprising 36 cells in which a workman was engaged working independently of the others. • The operation was started in 1825 and was halted a number of times due to flooding. • The Thames Tunnel was eventually opened in 1843. It had a height of 7m/23ft, width of 11m/37ft, and a total length of 406m/1,506ft. • It was eventually sold to the railways, becoming part of the underground network in 1865. East London Line • In 1865, the East London Railway was formed and it purchased the Thames Tunnel to form part of an underground rail link between the Great Eastern Railway at Liverpool Street and the South Eastern Railway and the London Brighton South Coast Railway at New Cross. The first part of the line, through the tunnel to Wapping was opened in December 1869. LT001639/007 Plan showing property along the East London Railway to be included in the Railway's lease provisions East London Line • The East London Railway owned the infrastructure but it never owned or operated its own trains, always relying on others. In 1884, the line was leased to a consortium of the 5 companies using it – a pattern that was to be repeated over the next 49 years until the East London Line came under the control of the London Passenger Transport Board in 1933. LT000565/012 A copy of the East London Railway: Further Powers Act, increasing the powers of the railway company to compulsorily purchase land, raise more money and authorise agreements and authorise agreements between itself and other railway companies. 1870. East London Line • The identity of the East London Line changed considerably over time. On maps between 1933 and 1968 it was depicted in the same colour as the Metropolitan Line. In 1970 it was renamed the ‘Metropolitan Line-East London Section’, in the 1980s it was renamed as a line in its own right, and from 1990 the colour changed to orange. The line carried 10.7 million passengers per year before its closure in 2007. • The former underground line was extended northwards to Whitechapel with new stations added, reopening on 23 May 2010 as part of the London Overground network. A further extension to Highbury and Islington was opened on 28 February 2011, with a final southern section to Clapham Junction opening in 2012. (Inner) Circle • The early success of the Metropolitan Railway prompted a huge number of proposals for other railways. Parliamentary committees of 1863-1864 evaluated them and decided that the best thing would be an inner circuit connecting both ends of the Metropolitan route with mainline termini. • The Metropolitan obtained powers to extend itself to Tower Hill and to South Kensington, in both cases along the present route of the Circle Line. A separate company was started to complete the rest of the circle, the Metropolitan District. It was planned that the two companies would merge as soon as practical. (Inner) Circle • However, the Metropolitan District was a much less profitable company than the Metropolitan, and the Metropolitan’s shareholders blocked the merger. The completion of the Inner Circle was in doubt, and the financial disparity lead to the formation of the Metropolitan Inner Circle Completion Railway Company, who sold shares in the completed Inner Circle – whilst it was still a work in progress. LT000346/090/007 Metropolitan Inner Circle Completion Railway Company – Prospectus, October 1877 • This forced negotiation between the Metropolitan and the Metropolitan District. • The Metropolitan bought the Inner Circle Completion Company and, having demonstrated a willingness to work together, a new arrangement between the Metropolitan and the Metropolitan District received Parliament’s approval in 1879. The Circle was completed in 1884. Inner Circle • The line began to gain its “The proposal to break own identity in the late 1930s, with the name the Circle at Baker Circle Line appearing on a Street and at South 1936 poster. Kensington takes a • In 2009, the continuous serious turn nature of the Circle Line was officially ended, financially, for the replaced by an end to end cost amounts to service between something over Hammersmith and Edgware Road via a single £600,000...We must circuit of a new loop and ask ourselves what the existing route.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Report 03/2014 February 2014 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 6 Preface 6 Key definitions 6 The incident 7 Summary of the incident 7 Context 7 Events preceding the incident 9 Events following the incident 11 Consequences of the incident 11 The investigation 12 Sources of evidence 12 Key facts and analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--History History 2016 Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945 Danielle K. Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.339 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Danielle K., "Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--History. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/history_etds/40 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--History by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic & Business History
    This article was published online on April 26, 2019 Final version June 30, 2019 Essays in ECONOMIC & BUSINESS HISTORY The Journal of the Economic &Business History Society Editors Mark Billings, University of Exeter Daniel Giedeman, Grand Valley State University Copyright © 2019, The Economic and Business History Society. This is an open access journal. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISSN 0896-226X LCC 79-91616 HC12.E2 Statistics and London Underground Railways STATISTICS: SPUR TO PRODUCTIVITY OR PUBLICITY STUNT? LONDON UNDERGROUND RAILWAYS 1913-32 James Fowler The York Management School University of York [email protected] A rapid deterioration in British railways’ financial results around 1900 sparked an intense debate about how productivity might be improved. As a comparison it was noted that US railways were much more productive and employed far more detailed statistical accounting methods, though the connection between the two was disputed and the distinction between the managerial and regulatory role of US statistical collection was unexplored. Nevertheless, The Railway Companies (Accounts and Returns) Act was passed in 1911 and from 1913 a continuous, detailed and standardized set of data was produced by all rail companies including the London underground. However, this did not prevent their eventual amalgamation into the London Passenger Transport Board in 1933 on grounds of efficiency. This article finds that despite the hopes of the protagonists, collecting more detailed statistics did not improve productivity and suggests that their primary use was in generating publicity to influence shareholders’, passengers’ and workers’ perceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology Powerhouse Raises Railway Alarm
    NEWS IN FOCUS to enrol all participants by 2018. Certain factors make researchers optimis- tic that the British study will succeed where the US one failed. One is the National Health Service, which provides care for almost all pregnant women and their children in the United Kingdom, and so offers a centralized means of recruiting, tracing and collecting medical information on study participants. In the United States, by contrast, medical care is provided by a patchwork of differ- ent providers. “I think that most researchers in the US recognize that our way of doing population-based research here is simply different from the way things can be done in the UK and in Europe, and it will almost always be more expensive here,” says Mark Klebanoff, a paediatric epidemiologist at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Colum- bus, Ohio, who was involved in early dis- cussions about the US study. The Francis Crick Institute sits at the nexus of three central London railway hubs. At one stage, US researchers had planned to knock on doors of random houses looking URBAN SCIENCE for women to enrol before they were even pregnant. “It became obvious that that wasn’t going to be a winning formula,” says Philip Pizzo, a paediatrician at Stanford University Biology powerhouse in Palo Alto, California, who co-chaired the working group that concluded that the National Children’s Study was not feasible. raises railway alarm “The very notion that someone was going to show up on your doorstep as a representa- tive from a govern­ment-funded study and Central London’s Francis Crick Institute fears that proposed say ‘Are you thinking of getting pregnant?’ train line will disrupt delicate science experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Capacity Study Update
    Chiltern & South Bucks Local Plan 2036 Settlement Capacity Study Page 0 of 122 Chiltern & South Bucks Local Plan 2036 Settlement Capacity Study Introduction Local authorities are encouraged by Paragraph 65 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) to set out a housing requirement for designated neighbourhood areas as part of their strategic policies. This is to enable neighbourhood plans to provide sufficient housing sites to meet their expected allocation. All currently-designated neighbourhood areas in Chiltern and South Bucks Districts share their boundaries with parish boundaries. It is anticipated that any future designations will also be for town council or parish council areas rather than for areas smaller or larger than these. The purpose of this study is to calculate required housing numbers for each parish within Chiltern and South Bucks. The Planning Practice Guidance1 confirms that there is no set methodology available for doing this, stating “the general policy making process already undertaken by local authorities can continue to be used to direct development requirements and balance needs and protections by taking into consideration relevant policies such as the spatial strategy, evidence such as the Housing and economic land availability assessment, and the characteristics of the neighbourhood area, including its population and role in providing services. In setting requirements for housing in designated neighbourhood areas, plan-making authorities should consider the areas or assets of particular importance (as set out in paragraph 11, footnote 6), which may restrict the scale, type or distribution of development in a neighbourhood plan area”. The NPPF requires the housing requirement figure for a neighbourhood area to reflect the Local Plan’s overall strategy for the pattern and scale of development and any relevant allocations.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Years Ago – a Postscript
    50 YEARS AGO – A POSTSCRIPT METROPOLITAN MODERNISATION Whilst some of us will recall the late-1950s and early 1960s as the period “when it all happened”, there was a lot going on much earlier. Here is a selection of what happened, details being obtained from the Traffic Circulars of the time. Some items may not be directly relevant but nevertheless are included for interest, if only that London Transport were bringing the Metropolitan Line up to date and ‘in line’ with the rest of the network. Date Brief details 02.01.50 “Stop-and-Proceed” abolished north of Harrow-on-the-Hill and all signals, semi- automatic and automatic, provided with signal post telephones. All trains to receive authority from relevant signalman before passing any signal at danger. Signal boxes affected were Watford Station (JL), Croxley (B), Watford Junction (C), Northwood (E), Pinner (G) and Harrow Station (JB). 01.50 Telephones provided on Chesham line (to signalmen at Chalfont & Latimer and Chesham) at One Mile Post, Two Mile Post and Three Mile Post. 04.06.50 Track slewed on a new alignment 30ft west of present from 1,000ft north of Watford South Junction to 1,500ft south of Watford South Junction, to allow bridges MR78, MR80 and MR81 to be taken out of use. 17.06.50 From midnight, maintenance responsibility for track, works & buildings and signalling between 28½ mile post (Mantles Wood) and 37 miles 195 yards, about ¾ mile south of Aylesbury South Junction, will be transferred from Railway Executive to London Transport. 25.06.50 London Transport to take over responsibility for management of ex-Joint Line from Harrow to Aylesbury South Junction including Watford and Chesham branches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Train Services on the Met and Gc Line
    THE EVOLUTION OF TRAIN SERVICES ON THE MET AND GC LINE by Eric Stuart (Readers may find reference to the Four-Tracking article in the July 2018 issue of Underground News helpful) After the Great Central (GC) arrived at Quainton Road and the service south thereof became established, both the GC and the Metropolitan Railway (Met.) provided services. However, the personalities at the heads of the two companies did not enjoy the best of relationships. Matters came to a head when a GC train crashed when failing to reduce speed over the (then) reverse curve into Aylesbury station in 1904. About that time, both the leaders retired and a period of better relations between the companies began. On 2 April 1906, the Metropolitan & Great Central Joint Railway (MGCJR) was created. This latter took over the lines of the Metropolitan Railway north and west of Harrow South Junction, with the exception of the branch to Uxbridge. These included the main line between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Verney Junction and the branch from Chalfont & Latimer to Chesham. The MGCJR was created under the terms of the Metropolitan & Great Central Railway Act, which received Royal Assent on 4 August 1905. At the same time, the Great Central and Great Western Joint Railway was formed, covering the lines south of Aylesbury via Princes Risborough to Northolt Junction. This was the result of a new line that aided the GC by partly avoiding congestion on the Met. and also giving the Great Western a shorter route to Birmingham1. One curiosity was that a Joint Committee was set up to manage a new Aylesbury station, jointly owned by two joint railways! Some points on terminology: The new line was commonly called just ‘The Joint Line’ and, even in later LT days, some staff still belonged to a particular class that made them feel superior to others2.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinohl Collection Album List
    Reinohl Collection album list The Reinohl Collection consists of 180 albums compiled by two brothers, Herbert and Albert Reinohl. The brothers were born in the late nineteenth century and began collecting material about transport (buses in particular) from childhood, continuing through to the 1950s. The collection is principally made up of tickets, but it also includes illustrations, press cuttings, journal articles and other ephemera from the UK and around the world. The list below gives brief details of what is covered by each album. If you would like to enquire about specific contents in the albums please contact us. The collection forms part of the Library collection at London Transport Museum (LTM) and is stored at the Museum Depot at Acton. Visits are available monthly, please check our website for further information https://www.ltmuseum.co.uk/collections/research/library. For all appointments, or any queries, please contact us. London Transport Museum Library Albany House, 98 Petty France, London SW1H 9EA Tel: +44 (0)343 222 5000 and select option 3 Email: [email protected] October 2019 1 Abbreviations used in the list: LGOC London General Omnibus Company LCC London County Council LPTB London Passenger Transport Board LT London Transport UDC Urban District Council Album Description 1 1829 London's First Omnibus to 1968 Woodruff's Omnibuses 2 Unknown Proprietors to James Powell 3 London & Suburban Omnibus Company to LGOC Route 14A 4 LGOC & Associate Companies Route 15 to LGOC & Thomas Tilling Ltd. Route 33A 5 LGOC & Thomas
    [Show full text]
  • Underline Art & Music for the Victoria Line
    Underline Art & Music for the Victoria line Learning Guide Key Stages 1–5 To download visit art.tfl.gov.uk/underline-learning-guide 5 Foreword 30 Your Tiles (art & design, technology) 6 The Importance of Art & Design 30 Design from Nature (art & design) on the London Underground 31 Design for a Home (art & design) 6 Art on the Underground 32 Create your own ‘Nanking’ inspired 6 The Project: Underline plate design (art & design) 7 The Artists’ Commissions & Timescale 32 STEM Activities 8 The Core Values of William Morris 32 Design a Tunnel (design & technology, STEM) 9 The Arts and Crafts Movement 33 History, Geography & IT Activities 9 The Influence of William Morris on London 33 Maps Underground’s Frank Pick 33 Construction of the Victoria line 10 Design Research Unit & Sir Misha Black (history, geography) 10 Victoria line 33 Investigative Geography Project 11 The Official Royal Opening 34 A Cutting-Edge Ticketing System 11 Diagram of the Victoria line (geography, British Values) 11 Interesting Facts about the Victoria line 34 Passengers through the Ages (history) 13 Original Victoria line Design Features 35 Literacy, Photography & Music Activities by Design Research Unit 35 News from Me (literacy) 16 Ten Stations by David Lawrence 35 Through a Lens – Underground (photography) 19 Classroom Activities 36 Above ground (photography) 20 Arts Award and Underline 37 Family Activities 21 Delivering Arts Award through 37 Challenge 1: Match the Labyrinth Underline: Mapping Resource 37 Challenge 2: Which Victoria line station is this? 22 Underline
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Junction Working on the London Underground Print and a Brief History of the Programme Machine Not
    Automatic Junction Working on the London Underground print and a brief history of the Programme Machine not do by M.A.C. Horne FCILT MIRO material CopyrightTop – Face of a slave dial driven by a binary clock and installed in some machine rooms after 1962 Version 4.6 Bottom – drawing of a programme machine unit Version 4.60 – 26 December 2015 Automatic Junction Working on the London Underground by M.A.C. Horne Introduction could operate from one signal box the equipment at one or more outlying boxes. This was necessary because the provision of high-integrity safety The Metropolitan District Railway began introducing power signalling signalling circuits over long distances was very expensive and the pre- in 1905 and set the theme for subsequent installations on the various ferred option was to locate the interlocking equipment locally and control deep level tube lines and their extensions. The system was further de- it using actuating cables that did not need to meet the same safety re- veloped by London Transport after its formation in 1933 and despite quirements. It is the development of this remote control facility that led the introduction of modern computer technology is still in place on var- the way to operating junctions automatically.print ious parts of the system. In essence the approach involved the At the centre of this article is the programme machine, a device that in deployment of signalling that was entirely automatic wherever possi- theory at least could operate the points and signals automatically as well ble, the signals being controlled directly by the movements of the as handling minor service notperturbations.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Lines Ref No
    Joint Lines Ref No. F Item Description and Source Notes F1 Documents re closure of Manchester Central F2 The Cheshire Lines Railway - HMRS Jnl, 1967, article F3 Accident at New Mills, report - HMSO, 1961 F4 Index to articles re CLC in RM F5 The Swinton & Knottingley Railway -Ms, D.L. Franks F6 Met. & L.T Lines - Notes F7 Met. Line electrification - Amersham station - MT, 4/59, article F8 The Chesham Branch - RM, n.d., article F9 Quainton Rd.-verney junction - Notes F10 Marple Rail Trails - W.R Burton F11 Manchester Central aerial view - A3 laser copy Donated by Robert Emblin. F12 Manchester Central & Piccadilly - Photographs Donated by Robert Emblin. F13 From Train Shed to Exhibition Centre - The Story of the Manchester Central Station - Original Ms copy Donated by Robert Emblin. F14 The Development of the Central Station site into the G-Mex Centre - N. Spooner, 1/1987 F15 Manchester Central Station - The Engineer, 13/2/80, 27/2/80, 5/3/80, copies F16 Recalling the CLC - P. Hay - Steam World 8/92 F17 Manchester Central Revisited - RW, 5/1983, R.E Rose, copy F18 Manchester Central Remembered - R.E Rose F19 The Rise & Fall of Manchester Central - K. Groundwater, RW, June 1969 F20 Marple - A one time traffic centre of the Midland Railway - BRJ 1994 - W.R. Burton F21 Manchester Central - GN Warehouse - Manchester Evening News, 17/10/95 (article & photo) F22 GCR's Joint Lines - The Rewards of a railway flirt - R. Emblin, B. Longbone F23 GCR joint lines - Data appendix - R. Emblin 2/1994 F24 Gw-GC Joint Line Opening April 1906 copy F25 Inspection of new works Neasden to Prices Risborough July 1904 copy F26 Inspection of new works Northolt to High Wycombe April 1905 F27 book: 'The Metropolitan Railway' by C.Baker.
    [Show full text]
  • Findings 1 Some Key Facts
    Transforming central London’s railway viaduct Volume 1: main findings 1 Some Key Facts: - The length of railway viaducts in the London South Central area is approximately 10km, making it the biggest building in London - The combined length of the 90 tunnels that can be travelled through is 4km - There are approx 1000 business units available to let in the adjoining arches - In London South Central, there are nearly 260,000 square metres of potential redevelopment space under the viaduct, with potential to create or retain over 10,000 jobs. - London Bridge is the oldest station, opening in 1836, and running to Greenwich. - The remaining viaducts were all built in the following 50 years, between 1836-1886. - The seven wards that the railway viaduct straddles are within the 20% most deprived in the country. - There is only one route north-south which avoids passing through the viaduct – via Mepham Street, immediately in front of Waterloo Station. - There are 97 million separate pedestrian journeys made through the tunnels every year FFoorrwwaarrdd ttoo VVoolluummee OOnnee This report offers a practical and affordable programme that will see the railway tunnels from Vauxhall to London Bridge transformed over the next few years, offering a clear way forward for all the partners involved. Light at the End of the Tunnel presents a strategic opportunity to transform a physical barrier through creative, positive partnership action. The barrier will become a community asset, a place of work, and the site of varied and stimulating public spaces. Over the past eight years, Cross River Partnership has focussed its attention on making the river a less formidable barrier.
    [Show full text]