DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex 1. Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex 1. Report Cleaner Fossil Fuel OPET – Contract No. NNE5/2002/97 WorkPackage # 3: Promotion of CCT Implementation Options in Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants Annex 1. Report Solid Fuel Power Sector of India, China, East European, South Caucasus and Balkan Countries Current Situation – CCT Implementation Possibilities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of this Report is the analytical data collection and inventory of the current situation in Coal-Fired Power Sector and future trends in East European countries and new promising markets. The Report is released in the frame of the CFF-OPET Project WP3 (“Promotion of CCT implementation options in existing coal-fired power plants”). The Report consists of 13 parts devoted to the analytical description of the coal-fired power sector of each country. In each part there are sections describing the electricity generation status, the coal-fired power plant park, the ownership and technical status, fuels used for electricity generation and future trends. Especially for Russia there is a section devoted to the potential of introduction of renovation activities. The countries that are under investigation are: Russia, Bulgaria, Serbia and Montenegro, Romania, FYR of Macedonia, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Georgia, Azerbaijan, India and China. In terms of coal reserves the above mentioned countries own more than one third of the world total coal reserves (BP statistical review 2003) with Russia, India and China owning 15.9%, 8.6% and 11.6%, respectively. As far as electricity production is concerned the countries that are under investigation produce more than 21% of the world- produced energy. ii CONTENTS Part I. – Russia Part II. – Bulgaria Part III. – Serbia and Montenegro Part IV. – Romania Part V. – FYR of Macedonia Part VI. – Estonia Part VII. – Lithuania Part VIII. – Latvia Part IX. – Poland Part X. – Georgia Part XI. – Azerbaijan Part XII. – India Part XIII. – China iii CENTRE for RESEARCH and TECHNOLOGY HELLAS INSTITUTE for SOLID FUELS TECHNOLOGY and APPLICATIONS (CE.R.T.H. / I.S.F.T.A.) All-Russian Thermal Engineering Institute (V.T.I.) (sub-contractor of CERTH/ISFTA) Report Solid Fuel Power Sector of India, China, East European, South Caucasus and Balkan Countries Current Situation – CCT Implementation Possibilities Part I. Russian Coal-Fired Power Sector Current Situation – Renovation Options Analysis Prepared by E. Nanos & A. Dimitriou Report prepared for ISFTA – April 2004 2 Pow power plantsrespectively plants, while21%,19%,10%and7%corres installed capacity.43%ofthecapac Figure 1illustratesthepowergenerationm located. Russian coal-firedUnitsandcapacityinth (180 Units)oftotalcapacity29298MW The Russiancoal-firedpowerplantparkis 1 ElectricityGeneration Figure 1:Russia’spow S our er PlantPark c Capacity (MWel) e V 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 43, T I 33% 0 Kemerovski Figure 2:Distributionof coalfiredpow Krasnoyarskiy Sverdlovskiy er generationmixintermsofinstalledcapacity(year2000). Buryatiya 7, 28% Moskovskiy P o 0, Republic Saha w 02% e Irkutsk r G Novosibirsk e n Re e Rostovskiy el . Figure2illustratesthedistributionof ra subdividedinto25therm i g pond toHydro,Coal,NuclearandOil-fired x of e regionsthatthepowerplantsparksare ity correspondstoNaturalGas-firedpower t i Omsk i o 18, o 20, n n Primorskiy theRussianenergysectorinterm M 72% 57% Ryazanskiy i x [ 10, Chelyabinskiy % ] Khabarovskiy 09% er plants Chitinskiy Tul'skiy Vologodskiy Yuzhnoural'sk a Ot Na Oi Co Nu Hy l powerstations l h Permskiy d t a c u e r l l e ra o 0 5 10 15 20 25 r Part I– a l r G No of Units a s the s of 1 Figure 3 illustrates the distribution of number of Units and installed capacity as a function of the Units electric capacity in MWel. 30 of 180 units have 300 MWel capacity which is the most preferable boiler dimension. Percentage of Capacity Number of Units e g 70 a t n e 60 60 c r 52 e 50 51 y t i P c & 40 s pa it a n 30 C U f of 20 o r e 10 9 2 mb 0 0 u N ≤100 >100 & >200 & >300 & >500 & ≥700 ≤200 ≤300 ≤500 ≤700 Capacity Range (MWel) Figure 3: Distribution of capacity in capacity ranges In table 1 the Russian coal-fired power plant park is presented with information about the installed capacity, ownership status and location. Coal-fired Power Station Park Name of Power Location/ Installed Capacity No of No Ownership Coal Units (Total) Comments Station Region MWe/MWth Units t. Inskoj, 652644, 1 Belovskaya Utility RAO EES c.Belov, 1200/143 (1200/143) 6 reg.Kemerovskiy t. Sharypovo, In fact N≤1300 2 Berezovskaya Utility-1 RAO EES 662320, 1600/442 (1600/442) 2 MWel (because reg.Krasnoyarskiy of slaging) Only first 13 t. Verxniy Tagil, drum boiler bun 3 Verxnetagil’skaya Utility* RAO EES 624151, 962/558 (1577/558) Main tube coal. The others reg.Sverdlovskiy burn gas t. Gusinoozersk, 4 Gusinoozerskaya Utility RAO EES 1260/257 (1260/257) 6 671280, Buryatiya There are some t. Kashira, 142900, 5 Kashirskaya Utility-4* RAO EES 900/193 (1880/500) 3 gas or oil units reg.Moskovskiy also t.Zelenogorsk, 1250/1798 6 Krasnoyarskaya Utility-2 RAO EES 663690, Main tube (1250/1798) reg.Krasnoyarskiy t.Nazarovo, 662200, 1120/1012 7 Nazarovskaya Utility RAO EES 7 reg.Krasnoyarskiy (1120/1012) t. Serebryaniy bor, 8 Neryungrinskaya Utility Yakutskenergo 678924, Republic 570/605 (570/605) 3 Saha Part I – 2 Coal-fired Power Station Park Name of Power Location/ Installed Capacity No of No Ownership Coal Units (Total) Comments Station Region MWe/MWth Units Sinyushina gora, 9 Novoirkutskaya CHP Irkutskenergo 655/1328 (655/1328) Main tube 664043, t.Irkutsk Sverdlov st. 15, Novosibirsk- 10 Novosibirskaya CHP-5 630028, 900/1515 (900/1515) 5 energo t.Novosibirsk c. Novocherkassk, 11 Novocherkasskaya Utility RAO EES 346415, 2400/87 (2400/87) 8 reg.Rostovskiy 12 Omskaya CHP-5 Omskenergo c. Omsk, 664009 695/1633 (695/1633) Main tube t. Luchegorsk, 13 Primorskaya Utility RAO EES 692024, 1467 9 reg.Primorskiy t. Asbest, 624065, 14 Reftinskaya Utility RAO EES 3600/407 (3600/407) 10 reg.Sverdlovskiy t.Novomichurinsk, There are some 15 Ryazanskaya Utility* RAO EES 391098, 1200/70 (2800/140) 4 gas or oil units reg.Ryazanskiy also t. Myski, 652860, 16 Tom’-Usinskaya Utility Kuzbassenergo 1272/306 (1272/306) 9 reg.Kemerovskiy t. Troick, 457100, 17 Troickaya Utility RAO EES 2155/366 (2155/366) 8 reg.Chelyabinskiy t. Dzerzhinskiy, 1310/2495 18 CHP-22 Mosenergo Mosenergo 140056, 11 (1310/2495) reg.Moskovskiy t. Berezovka, Khabarovsk- 19 Khabarovskaya CHP-3 682314, 540/907 (540/907) 3 energo reg.Khabarovskiy t.Yasnogorsk, 20 Kharanorskaya Utility RAO EES 674520, 430/972 (430/972) 2 reg.Chitinskiy Ostrovskiy st. 1a, 21 Cherepetskaya Utility RAO EES 301400, t.Suvorov, 1500/109 (1500/109) 7 reg.Tul’skiy Promyshlennaya st. 22 Cherepoveckaya Utility RAO EES 2, 162510, t.Kaduy, 630/45 (630/45) 3 reg.Vologodskiy Chernoozerskiy av. There are some 5, 140700, 23 Shaturskaya Utility-5* RAO EES 600/42 (1100/284) 3 gas or oil units t.Shatura, also reg.Moskovskiy Sportivnaya st. 1, There are some 24 Yuzhnoural’skaya Utility* RAO EES 457040, 482/459 (882/459) Main tube gas or oil units t.Yuzhnoural’sk also t. Yajva, 618340, 25 Yajvinskaya Utility RAO EES 600/80 (600/80) 4 reg.Permskiy Main tube: Several boilers connected to the same steam turbine Table 1: Russian Coal-fired Power Plant Park 3 Ownership of Power Stations Almost 80% of the power plants (in terms of installed capacity) belong to RAO EES (RAO EES provides about 70 % of the total electricity in Russia and controls 70% of the Part I – 3 total installed capacity). Figure 4 presents the share of all companies in the installed capacity of the Russian coal-fired power plant park. As far as the number of stations is concerned RAO EES owns 18 power plant and the rest of the companies own one each. Following RAO EES in installed capacity is Mosenergo and Kuzbassenergo with 1310MWel and 1272 MWel respectively. Ownership of Power Plants [MWel / % ] 540 570 655 1272 1,8% 1,9% 2,2% 4,3% 1310 4,5% 900 Irkutskenergo 3,1% 695 Khabarovsk-energo 2,4% Kuzbassenergo Mosenergo Novosibirsk-energo Omskenergo 23356 RAO EES 79,7% Yakutskenergo Figure 4: Ownership status of the Russian coal-fired power plants 4 Technical Data of Thermal Units In the next paragraphs the general status of the Russian coal-fired power sector is analysed. The analysis is based on the data collected from the power plants and concern with the environmental performance, the achieved efficiencies, availability etc of the power plants. 4.1 Age of coal-fired units in Russia The Russian coal-fired power Units are characterized as of advanced age. More than 50% of the installed capacity corresponds to Units older than 30 years old, while about a quarter of the fleet’s installed capacity is in the range of 20 to 30 years. As far as the number of the units is concerned more than 60% are older than 30 years old while about 20% is in the range of 20 – 30 years (figure 5). Part I – 4 Percentage of Electric Capacity [%] Number of Units 40 80 f ] d o % lle 30 60 its e [ 55 a n g t y 49 t a t U 20 36 40 f aci l Ins o p cen a 27 o r a e N C 10 20 P Tot 5 0 2 0 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 >50 Years Figure 5: Classification of units according to their age. 4.2 Availability of coal-fired units in Russia The availability of the Russian coal-fired power plants is considered to be quite low. As it is obvious from the next diagram which illustrates the availability of the Russian coal- fired Units as a function of their commissioning year, most of the Units are in the range of 30 to 70%.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Koste Glavinića 8A, 11000 Belgrade
    Koste Glavinića 8a, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Phone: +381 11 3691 477 Fax: +381 11 3690 823 http://www.ieent.org Company Information GENERAL In the year 2006 it has been 150 years since the birth of Nikola Tesla scientist, inventor and visionary, whose work have changed the world and significantly contributed development and speed progress of manhood and electrical engineering. At the same time, it has been 70 years since the president of Serbian Royal Academy of sciences, Mr Bogdan Gavrilovic, declared the establishment of Institute "Nikola Tesla" - "as a temple of science in the glory of his name and eternal beauty of his work". In its history that lasts more than seven decades, Institute passed through great number of changes and transformations in order to accommodate to changes in its surrounding and during that time changed its name and working area. Today, Electrical Engineering Institute "Nikola Tesla" is independent scientific - research joint - stock organization (98% owned by state, 2% owned by small shareholders) which activity covers a wide spectra of problems in the area of production, transmission, distribution and implementation of electrical energy. Nikola Tesla Institute Building At Koste Glavinića 8a St. in Belgrade 1 Company Information R&D PROFILE Our R&D profile presents synthesis of scientific and expert knowledge across a wide spectrum of disciplines: energy, high voltage, high power electronics, automation, computer science, measurement, information systems, and software engineering. By synthesis of scientific and engineering knowledge and experience Institute become admirable and authoritative scientific institution in our country and abroad in the area of electrical engineering, always ready to answer to the challenges of modern science and at the same time to respond to the necessities of domestic economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Tourism for Rural Lovren, Vojislavka Šatrić and Jelena Development” (2010 – 2012) Beronja Provided Their Contributions Both in English and Serbian
    Environment and sustainable rural tourism in four regions of Serbia Southern Banat.Central Serbia.Lower Danube.Eastern Serbia - as they are and as they could be - November 2012, Belgrade, Serbia Impressum PUBLISHER: TRANSLATORS: Th e United Nations Environment Marko Stanojević, Jasna Berić and Jelena Programme (UNEP) and Young Pejić; Researchers of Serbia, under the auspices Prof. Branko Karadžić, Prof. Milica of the joint United Nations programme Jovanović Popović, Violeta Orlović “Sustainable Tourism for Rural Lovren, Vojislavka Šatrić and Jelena Development” (2010 – 2012) Beronja provided their contributions both in English and Serbian. EDITORS: Jelena Beronja, David Owen, PROOFREADING: Aleksandar Petrović, Tanja Petrović Charles Robertson, Clare Ann Zubac, Christine Prickett CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Prof. Branko Karadžić PhD, GRAPHIC PREPARATION, Prof. Milica Jovanović Popović PhD, LAYOUT and DESIGN: Ass. Prof. Vladimir Stojanović PhD, Olivera Petrović Ass. Prof. Dejan Đorđević PhD, Aleksandar Petrović MSc, COVER ILLUSTRATION: David Owen MSc, Manja Lekić Dušica Trnavac, Ivan Svetozarević MA, PRINTED BY: Jelena Beronja, AVANTGUARDE, Beograd Milka Gvozdenović, Sanja Filipović PhD, Date: November 2012. Tanja Petrović, Mesto: Belgrade, Serbia Violeta Orlović Lovren PhD, Vojislavka Šatrić. Th e designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. Acknowledgments Th is publication was developed under the auspices of the United Nations’ joint programme “Sustainable Tourism for Rural Development“, fi nanced by the Kingdom of Spain through the Millennium Development Goals Achievement Fund (MDGF).
    [Show full text]
  • Za[Tita Prirode 58/1–2 Protection of Nature 58/1–2
    ZAVOD INSTITUTE ZA ZA[TITU FOR NATURE PRIRODE CONSERVATION SRBIJE OF SERBIA ZA[TITA PRIRODE 58/1–2 PROTECTION OF NATURE 58/1–2 YUISSN–0514–5899 UDK:502/504 Beograd/Belgrade 2008 ^ASOPIS ZAVODA ZA ZA[TITU PRIRODE SRBIJE JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE FOR NATURE CONSERVATION OF SERBIA 11070 Novi Beograd, Dr Ivana Ribara 91 21000 Novi Sad, Radni~ka 20a 18000 Ni{, Vo`dova 14 E-mail: [email protected] Za izdava~a/For Publisher prof. dr Lidija Amixi} Redakcioni odbor/Editorial board Akademik Stevan Karamata dr William Wimbledon, Velika Britanija dr Jan ^erovsky, ^e{ka prof. dr Milutin Qe{evi} prof. dr Vladimir Stevanovi} dr Milan Bursa} prof. dr Lidija Amixi} dr Du{an Mijovi} dr Biqana Pawkovi} mr Sr|an Belij, sekretar Glavni urednik/Chif Editor dr Milan Bursa} Tehni~ki urednik/Technical editor Sne`ana Korolija Fotografija na predwoj korici / Photo on front cover Beloglavi sup Gyps fulvus — foto: B. Gruba~ Fotografija na zadwoj korici / Photo on back cover Mediteranski pauk Segestria florentina, female — foto: M. Komnenov Priprema za {tampu/Prepres Davor Pal~i} [email protected] [tampa/Print HELETA d.o.o. Ju`ni bulevar 5, Beograd Tira`/Press 800 SADR@AJ / CONTENTS Sr|an Belij GEODIVERZITET I GEONASLE\E U RAZVOJU GEOMORFOLOGIJE I ZA[TI- TI PRIRODE GEODIVERSITY AND GEOHERITAGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMOR- PHOLOGY AND NATURE CONSERVATION ....................................... 5 Dragan Ne{i}, Dragan Pavi}evi}, Sini{a Ogwenovi} REZULTATI SPELEOMORFOLO[KIH I BIOSPELEOLO[KIH ISTRA@I- VAWA JAME VRTA^EQE (LEDENA PE]INA) THE RESULTS OF SPELEOMORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOSPELEOLOGICAL STUDIES OF THE PIT VRTA^ELJE (LEDENA PE]INA)............................
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profiles on the Housing Sector Serbia And
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Geneva COUNTRY PROFILES ON THE HOUSING SECTOR SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2006 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. * * * The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/HBP/139 Copyright © United Nations, 2006 All rights reserved Printed at United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION ii CONTENTS FOREWORD.........................................................................................................................................................vii PREFACE..............................................................................................................................................................ix Chapter I THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC FRAMEWORK FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HOUSING SECTOR..................................................................................................................................................................1 A. General information ................................................................................................................................1 B. Economy……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..1
    [Show full text]
  • COAL MINING and PREPARATION in SERBIA Milena Kostović 1, Nebojša Kostović 2 and Rade Tokalić1
    UNDERGROUND MINING ENGINEERING 33 (2018) 69-77 UDK 62 UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE - FACULTY OF MINING AND GEOLOGY ISSN 03542904 Review paper COAL MINING AND PREPARATION IN SERBIA Milena Kostović 1, Nebojša Kostović 2 and Rade Tokalić1 Received: September 8, 2018 Accepted: October 16, 2018 Abstract: Coal reserves in Serbia represent an important strategic energy raw materials on which in the coming decades will be based energy development in Serbia. Coal mining in Serbia is performed by surface, underground and underwater mining, and within each of them there are also the coal preparation facilities. Underground mining is done in the scope of the JP PEU Resavica, which includes eight active mines: Bogovina, Rembas, Vrška čuka, Štavalj, Ibar, Soko, Jasenovac and Lubnica. Surface mining is carried out as part of a JP EPS. Mining operation is done in mining basin Kolubara and Kostalac which are supplier of three thermal power plants: Kolubara, Nikola Tesla and Morava. Underwater mining and preparation of coals in Serbia has been done in Kovin coal mine. Coal production, processes of preparation and quality for all active mines in Serbia are presented in this review paper. Keywords: coal; mining; mines; preparation; thermal power plants; Serbia; 1 INTRODUCTION The first coal mine was opened in Vrdnik on Fruška gora in 1804. This year presents the beginning of Serbian mining and preparation. In 1836 the first national coal mine was opened in village Mliva near Despotovac. In 1846 the first private coal mine Dobra on Danube was opened. At the end of XIX century, Serbia have had 20 opened coal mines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reform Agenda of Serbia
    THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA THE REFORM AGENDA OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA THE NEEDS FOR INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE MINISTRY OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS Belgrade, 2003. Table of Contents 1. CHALLENGES AT THE BEGINNING OF REFORMS...................................................... 3 1.1. Priorities and Achievements at the Beginning of Reforms............................. 3 1.2. Donors’ Assistance............................................................................................... 5 2. PRIORITIES IN 2003 AND REFORM STRATEGY........................................................... 7 2.1 Priorities of the Government of Serbia in 2003.................................................. 7 2.2. Reform Strategy ................................................................................................... 8 3. STABILIZATION AND LIBERALIZATION ..................................................................... 12 3.1. Monetary Reform and Restructuring of the Financial Sector...................... 12 3.2. Fiscal Adjustment and Price Liberalization..................................................... 14 3.3. Trade Liberalization............................................................................................ 17 4. INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS......................................................................................... 19 4.1. The Rule of Law and the Reform of Government Administration............. 19 4.2. Development of Market Relations Based on Changes in Legislation........ 21 4.3. Fight
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in the Sava River Basin
    PRELIMINARY FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN July, 2014 Date Document Revision History Document Author/Reviser 23 September 2013 Initial draft – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ PEG FP 17 December 2013 Draft 2 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, M. Babić Mladenović 30 January 2014 Draft 2.1 – reviewed at 23rd PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 20 March 2014 Draft 3 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, A. Bezdrob 14 April 2014 Draft 3.1 – sent as doc. for 24th PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 02 June 2014 Draft 4 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić 10 June 2014 Draft 4.1 – sent to PEG FP for approval Secretariat/ PEG FP (no comments) 18 June 2014 Draft 5 – sent to ISRBC Secretariat/ ISRBC 01 July 2014 ISRBC accepted and approved publishing on web ISRBC International Sava River Basin Commission Kneza Branimira 29 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia T: + 385 1 488 69 60 F: + 385 1 488 69 86 [email protected] www.savacommission.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE SAVA RIVER BASIN .................................................................. 3 3 OVERALL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 4 3.1 SLOVENIA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Water Cooperation in Reponse of Floods: Example of Sava River Basin
    Transboundary water cooperation in reponse of floods: example of Sava River Basin Enhancing transboundary water cooperation in the North Africa Region Tunis, 20-21 Dec 2017 Melita Žižanović Dakić, Legal Expert, Secretariat of the Sava Commission Sava river basin • Main facts – Area: ≈ 97 700 km2 (the second largest Danube sub-basin; share: 12%) – River length: 990 km (≈ 600 km of which is the waterway) – Population: approx. 9 million Country Share of the basin (%) Albania 0.2 Bosnia & Herzegovina 39.2 Croatia 26.0 Montenegro 7.1 Serbia 15.5 Slovenia 12.0 Enhancing Transboundary water cooperation in the North Africa Region, Tunis 20-21 Dec 2017 Background to cooperation Legal framework • Framework Agreement on the Sava River Basin (sig. 2002) & Protocol on flood protection to the Framework Agreement (sig. 2010) – Parties • Bosnia & Herzegovina • Croatia • Serbia • Slovenia Montenegro – cooperation on technical leve until full membership • Implementation coordinated by International Sava River Basin Commission Enhancing Transboundary water cooperation in the North Africa Region, Tunis 20-21 Dec 2017 3 Flood Risk Management Significant floods Year of flood Affected area/river Oct/Nov 1896 Drina River Apr 1932 Sava River Oct 1933 Sava River Nov 1944 Sava River Oct 1964 Sava River Dec 1966 Sava and Kupa rivers Dec 1968 Bosna River Jan 1970 Sava and Bosut rivers Oct 1974 Sava, Krapina, Kupa and Una Jul 1989 Krapina River 1990 Upper Sava River Basin Oct/Nov 1998 Upper Sava River Basin Nov 1998 Kupa River Jul 1999 Tamnava, Ub and Gračica rivers
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia: Floods
    Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Serbia: Floods DREF Operation Operation n° MDRRS009 Glide n° FF-2014-000059-SRB Date of issue: 21 May 2014 Date of disaster: 13 May 2014 Operation manager (responsible for this EPoA): Point of contact: Djula Losonc; Disaster Management Coordinator, Vesna Milenovic, Secretary General Red Cross of Serbia Red Cross of Serbia Tel +381 11 30 32 125; Email [email protected] Alberto Monguzzi IFRC Europe Zone Disaster Management Coordinator Tel +36 1 8884 505; Email [email protected] Operation start date: 13 May 2014 Expected timeframe: 4 months Overall operation budget: CHF 290,926 Number of people to be assisted: Number of people affected: 120,000 households 7,120 people evacuated and sheltered Host National Society : Red Cross of Serbia Red Cross / Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: IFRC, ICRC Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Emergency Management Department of the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Serbia, Municipalities, emergency headquarters of the endangered municipalities A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster Torrential rainfall has affected Serbia since 13 May 2014, with the amount of rain reaching two months` average in just two days. The floods in Serbia have taken at least 21 lives and more than 30,873 people have been evacuated by the Emergency Sector, Police and the Military Forces to date. A state of emergency has been declared for the whole country. All schools in Belgrade stopped work for two days while 155 primary and secondary schools are still closed in the affected areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Topographic Modelling in Case with Higher Flood in the Municipality Obrenovac
    UNIVERSITY THOUGHT doi:10.5937/univtho8-18679 Publication in Natural Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2018, pp. 44-48. Original Scientific Paper DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC MODELLING IN CASE WITH HIGHER FLOOD IN THE MUNICIPALITY OBRENOVAC ALEKSANDAR VALJAREVIĆ1*, DRAGICA ŽIVKOVIĆ 2 1Faculty of Natural Science and Mathematics, University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 2Faculty of Geography, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia ABSTRACT The town of Obrenovac is situated near the banks of three rivers, the Sava River, the Kolubara River and the Tamnava River. It looks like a modern town, though it has often developed in an unplanned manner. This causes huge problems as it thrives in a rough terrain, without a plan, which the communal infrastructure cannot follow. Today's needs in terms of spatial planning, envisaging projects and keeping track of a different kind of information on space demand that new technologies be applied since they make it possible for procuring efficient and reliable information as well as connecting and interconnecting various sorts of data. Also with advanced numerical GIS data and relief analysis we were successfully calculated consequence of the last big flood in 2014. Keywords: Rivers, Flood, Digital, Modelling, Preventive, GIS. River to the south and the Velika Bara Canal to the east. The INTRODUCTION position of 77 metres above sea level, in the Sava and Kolubara alluvial plain, has had an impact on the town being shaped as an The catastrophic floods in May 2014 was producing many inverted letter T (Figure 1). damage consequences in the territory of the municipality of Obrenovac. The wild river Kolubara caused a flood to remember.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartographic Recognition with Elements of Planography of Medieval Square Macho
    Available online at www.gi.sanu.ac.rs J. Geogr. Inst. Cvijic. 63(4) (111-123) Original scientific paper UDC: 912 DOI: 10.2298/IJGI1304112K CARTOGRAPHIC RECOGNITION WITH ELEMENTS OF PLANOGRAPHY OF MEDIEVAL SQUARE MACHO 1 Lepota L. Kuzmanović * * Šabac, Serbia Received 28 May 2013; reviewed 22 August 2013; accepted 27 November 2013 Abstract: Paper reserch some important geographic issues in the light of classical historical argument. Attempt to unify the different mapping systems in the presence of international consensus of cartography regarding the position of the square and town Macho. Foreign, Hungarian and Bulgarian mappings clearly indicate the location of the town, in the continuation of research the international and time comparisons of entered map values are made, creating necessary geographical and historical synthesis.In cartographic displays, there is no doubts, the name Gradac appears as Slovenian counterpart of recognized name Macho. Key words: international cartography, recognition, county, square Mačva, comparison Introduction Regarding current scientific knowlegde there was little, if any, use of international cartographic fact in recognition of medieval Macho. The Serbian aspects mainly ignored geographical and visual elements for precise positioning of the city, while omitting systematic and rational cartographic representation of the site, region, and district. Through comparison of different cartographic versions, there could be drawn a significant scientific conclusions providing synthesis of historiographical, planimetrical and geographical facts. The beginnings of the Mačva historically is associated with the early Middle Ages, when the written monuments are found. Since then, and especially further- on, the names and tittles of the governors of Mačva district or country are frequently recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Reduction Strategies and the Early Warning Systems for Alerting the Population in Western Balkan Countries
    ___________________________________________________________________________ 2018/TEL58/DSG/WKSP1/003 Flood Risk Reduction Strategies and the Early Warning Systems for Alerting the Population in Western Balkan Countries Submitted by: Alfa BK University Workshop on Earthquakes and Waterfloods Monitoring System with the Application of the Internet of Things Taipei, Chinese Taipei 1 October 2018 FLOOD RISK REDUCTION STRATEGIES AND THE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS FOR ALERTING THE POPULATION IN WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES Emeritus prof. dr Larisa Jovanović ALFA BK University, Belgrade, Serbia ECOLOGICA Society, Belgrade, Serbia Abstract. The paper deals with flood risk reduction and methods of early flood warning. Flooding is one of most frequent and damaging type of natural disasters in Balkan countries. There is high probability that the impact of floods in Balkans will increase due to climate change. The watercourse arrangement includes the construction and maintenance of regulating facilities for watercourse regulation and the execution of works on maintaining the stability of the shore and riverbeds and providing water, ice and water throughput for the purpose of reducing the risk of flooding. Protection against harmful effects of water includes measures and works for protection against floods by external and internal waters, floods caused by ice barriers and floods of erosion and torrents. Since flood events are becoming more frequent and more intense, with the constant increase of exposure of people and goods due to intensive occupation of water-to-water areas, the need for increasing the level of protection of these areas is growing, so it is necessary to constantly improve and upgrade existing flood protection facilities and systems. Future research on floods should be focused on improving preparedness and response during a flood crisis, mainly warning and monitoring systems, also through the assessment of mitigation and prevention measures.
    [Show full text]