DOCSLIB.ORG

Lavant Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016 - 2031

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lavant Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016 - 2031 LAVANT NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2016 - 2031 CONSULTATION STATEMENT Volume 2: Appendices Lavant Parish Council November 2016 Appendix 1a Neighbourhood Plan Meeting Notes 3rd October 2013 NP meeting 3rd October 2013.. consolidated Feedback Q1: Which groups in the community do you think need to be included in the consultation? How do we encourage them to come? Groups Elderly via, Lunch Club, Lavant Friendly Club, Church, WI Lavant Friendly Club Lavant Women’s Institute Open House Club Royal British Legion Young by age segment including teenagers Lavant Cricket Club Lavant Football Club Short Mat Bowls Club Business Lavant Valley Allotment Association via, AGM, Newsletter Lavant C.E. Primary School - play group -Toddlers -parents -staff -Friends of Lavant School Lavant House School Churches Pubs Accommodation B&B Stables Farmers Goodwood Estate Hyde Martlet - Social Housing Lavant Horticultural Society Lavant Memorial Hall Committee Lavant Players Lavant Village Fete Committee St Wilfrid’s Hospice Lavant Valley Support Group Groups Participation Universal view was that the SG or WG would have to go out to meet the “group”, no realistic possibility of “groups” attending some event. A questionnaire to groups was viewed in passing but rejected as quickly because it would not be filled in. One-to-one appeared to be the favoured way forward, with a semi pre-structured interview/fact finding discussion. Issue is with some groups need to get beyond the gatekeeper (Chairman) to ensure a more universal view of the “Group” is obtained. Presentations to AGM’s, insertions into group newsletters where given as examples. Any discussion should be around the “Group” ambitions and vision for the future and the key follow up question. What is holding you back? Good quality and frequent feedback on progress of project/status and so forth was viewed as key. Mention of displays (pop-ups) at community events as an exemplar. Web site was mentioned, in or by the Parish site. I did get concern for those who do not have access to a PC. Q2: What needs and issues are important for Lavant’s future? The following is a list of initial individual (unedited) responses to the question: Housing, social, old age, social housing, amount of housing, cater for all age groups, especially older/younger Work opportunities Old age / retirement issues Transport, transport routes, traffic/roads Amenities, bus service, shop, dentist, surgery, facilities Village identity, maintain the gap, separation from city, preserving integrity/boundaries, development between Lavant and Chichester, correct numbers of developments and their location Footpaths Car parks Infrastructure - all aspects of water, flooding, build infrastructure support (roads/ water/internet /traffic) Communication – BT broadband, mobile, better mobile communications, BT internet, signal strength Look of Lavant around St Nick’s Relationship with SDNP, links with SDNP Goodwood Control of developments The following notes were captured from 4 x 15 minute group sessions during which the groups discussed the above question: 1. Preserving the green space between Chichester and Lavant. The groups discussed the need for the village to maintain its individuality. The current gap between the village and Chichester was regarded as very important. It was felt strongly that the village must protect itself against becoming another suburb of Chichester. In particular, the proposed ‘daffodil field’ development should be defeated, as should any other development which threatens to reduce the green gap between Lavant and Chichester. It was thought that the village should seek to strengthen its links with the SDNP and CDC in order that Lavant’s needs (as defined by the Lavant community) might be promoted and catered for. 2. A hub for the community. A place where members of the community could meet and interact. A community centre, perhaps with a bar, facilities for the young, a surgery, a shop. There was a suggestion that the community could apply for lottery funding to build a new community building. There was discussion about the best location for such a building. People talked about the fact that the Lavant community is ‘strung out’ and would benefit from future developments ‘filling in’ adjacent to existing developments to create more of a central village hub. Suggestions included: behind the Earl of March pub, or the industrial estate in Mid Lavant. 3. Lack of adequate pavements and footpaths. Pedestrians are currently unable to walk safely on several roads in the village. There are key routes, which have no pavement or footpath. Safe use of pavements and footpaths is also an issue for wheelchair users. 4. Employment within the village. There was discussion about the fact that the village industrial site appears to be ‘running down’ with fewer businesses operating within it. The groups talked about how Lavant might capitalise on its unique location, such that Lavant might be an attractive location for new businesses. Lavant could be promoted as a ‘Gateway to the South Downs National Park’ and as result, might be an ideal location for specialist leisure services, such as cycle hire, guided walks, craft based products etc. Lavant encompasses part of the Goodwood estate and so there may be opportunities to capitalise on the various racing events etc. 5. Building developments. There was a lot of discussion about the need to influence future developments such that the following are addressed: a. Density of buildings to be reduced and gardens to be larger (as compared to recent developments in Lavant) b. Developers should contribute to community e.g. via support for community projects such as community hub, shop, parking, elderly care, sheltered accommodation c. Provision of affordable housing for local young people d. Provision of adequate car parking spaces both within new developments and to service the need for parking around the village school and St. Nicholas e. Diversity of housing needs to be taken into account – young and elderly f. Developments should not increase the ‘stretched’ layout of Lavant, but should infill to create more of a central village layout. Thus protecting green space and at the same time creating a more central community layout. 6. Catering for our elderly. Currently there is no provision of housing specifically designed to cater for the needs of those elderly residents who can no longer live independently, but require some form of support. The groups talked about the advantages for the community if elderly residents had their accommodation needs met within the village; as opposed to having to leave the community in order to have their needs met. 7. Communications. The groups discussed the need to improve the quality and strength of mobile phone signals and internet connections. 8. Infrastructure. The groups raised the following two issues, which due to time constraints did not get discussed at length: a. Roads, transport routes, traffic control and safety. b. Water, sewerage and flooding The last group concluded with a plea, that as members of the Lavant community, we need to make the most of what we’ve got! Q3 = How do we get everyone’s views Verbal comments made: Information sheet - Mail shot to every home informing about the Neighbour plan coupled with a possible home visit. Having an open meeting to start the process (My comment - we have in some respect already started the process). Poster around the village. Website for this project. Pop up meetings to cover groups and meeting points, including bus stops, playground, dogs’ walkers and Mums at schools. Lavant News – Notice Notice at the local doctors surgery Local Radio School Project? Difficult target groups to get their views – Young People, people who are not involved in village activities – how do we get them involved. What is the message – is going to be common pack of information? Need a keep action plan to get the message across and get people involved. Written comments * Do people have any Views??? Assume they do Who should be consulted? Everyone Residents Working in Lavant Schools Church Users of the facilities in Lavant Businesses How? Survey Focus groups Meeting in busy places Opportunistic survey Flyers to all – invite to meeting/ presentation and questionnaires Local reps cover small areas – the person to speak to Email address/website to send comments/responses to Letter box (local Rep) to drop into Need to be careful that people with strong views don’t input comments by different means to be counted more than once. Leaflet Campaign Posters in prominent places( school/hall/churches etc) Have a date set for gathering for people to come together to share their views ( should they have them) Run an OPEN SPACE type project to collect and distil these views. Issues? Facilities for healthy a community For both young and old Safe environment Jobs Housing – planning, location, town/green field ,affordable and sheltered Traffic problems esp A286 – do we need a bypass?? Transport issues o buses to Chi and elsewhere o Cycle track Industrial site – Employment Local assisted accommodation ( elderly care) Facilities o memorial hall o cricket club o football o playground o allotments River Lavant – Flood protection, pond. Maintain Community facilities – football field Involving the village in the environment Making a place for a shop Land for development – no flood risk Nick Reynolds as a Host 03/October NP MEETING NOTES St Nics NP.NRcomments03oct13mtg 1.QUESTION WHAT NEEDS AND ISSUES ARE IMPORTANT FOR LAVANT’S FUTURE? 2.RESPONSES (no order, no priority, no edit, not repeated where mentioned several times) . Maintaining the Strategic Gap north of Summersdale to retain Lavant identity as separate community . Design of any development to be ‘right’ for the village….not Wimpey Boxes . Ban heavy lorries from the A286 . More attempt to foster a full village feeling – not the North/South divide . Maintain a Rural Character/ protect beautiful setting . Conserve historic buildings and heritage .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Upper Lavant Flood Risk Management Study
    Upper Lavant Flood Risk Management Study Presentation to Lavant Valley Partnership June 2015 About this study • CH2M – who? • What is an SWMP and why are we doing it? – Research, collect, collate, and review flood related data – Investigate and analyse – Include stakeholder engagement – Identify problems, options and mitigation measures • When? – 15-18mth staged programme, commenced March 2014 • Where and why ? – Easebourne, Lavant, Lancing, Manhood, West Chichester, Billingshurst & Hassocks – Locations with identified flooding issues, as part of Operation Watershed response 2 Presentation Title Objectives of the study • The primary objectives of this study are to: – understand the flooding issues within the catchment; – consider current flood risk management practices within the Upper Lavant Valley; – identify localised capital and maintenance measures which can be taken, and; – provide evidence to prepare for, and respond to, flooding incidents 3 Presentation Title Study Area 4 Presentation Title Recent flooding issues and impacts • 1994 – Extensive flooding in the valley (and serious fluvial flooding in Chichester) • 2000/01 – Flooding in valley and widespread through Southern England • 2012/13 & 2013/14 – two of the wettest winters on records Village Properties / Infrastructure affected by flooding (2013/14) East Dean Several properties suffer basement flooding Butchers Lane and Main Road are flooded (not impassable) Charlton Charlton Road flooded along various sections from East Dean to Charlton Flooding also occurs at both bridges
    [Show full text]
  • Funds Received Between 01 April 2018 and 31 March 2019
    S106 Appendix 5 - Income Received Bewteen 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 Ward App No Address Obligation Type Amount Date Received Received Chichester 17/03136/FUL 19 Southgate, Chichester, PO19 1ES Recreation Disturbance Chichester 4,833.00 10/04/2018 Central Chichester 18/00051/FUL 56, 56A And 56B East Street, Chichester, Recreation Disturbance Chichester 974.00 12/07/2018 Central West Sussex, PO19 1JG Chichester 18/00341/FUL 51B South Street, Chichester, West Recreation Disturbance Chichester 461.00 01/05/2018 Central Sussex, PO19 1DS Chichester 18/01038/FUL The Barn, Little London, Chichester, West Recreation Disturbance Chichester 487.00 20/06/2018 Central Sussex, PO19 1PL Chichester 18/01188/FUL 25 West Street, Chichester, PO19 1QW Recreation Disturbance Chichester 880.00 31/10/2018 Central Chichester 18/01761/FUL 19 Southgate, Chichester, PO19 1ES Recreation Disturbance Chichester 4,083.00 29/11/2018 Central Chichester 18/02600/FUL 81 North Street, Chichester, PO19 1LQ Recreation Disturbance Chichester 487.00 21/01/2019 Central Chichester 18/02948/FUL Purchases Restaurant, 31 North Street, Recreation Disturbance Chichester 487.00 06/03/2019 Central Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1LX Chichester 19/00246/PA3O 26 Chapel Street, Chichester, West Recreation Disturbance Chichester 974.00 11/03/2019 Central Sussex, PO19 1DL Chichester East 16/02038/FUL 117 The Hornet, Chichester, West Sussex, Affordable Housing Commuted Sum 267,602.64 15/10/2018 PO19 7JP Chichester 10/03490/FUL Roussillon Barracks, Chichester Harbour 21,632.16 15/10/2018
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Heritage Assets in Lavant
    A REVIEW OF HERITAGE ASSETS IN LAVANT Lavant Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016 - 2031 Lavant Parish Council December 2016 2 | INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 4 Background ........................................................................................... 4 How can heritage assets protected? .................................................... 6 International & National Designations ............................................ 6 Local Designations ........................................................................... 6 Existing designations in Lavant ............................................................. 7 2.0 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................... 10 Guidance for assessing the criteria ....................................................11 3.0 ASSESSMENT OF BUILDINGS AND FEATURES ....................................... 12 4.0 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................... 14 APPENDIX 1 - Existing designations in Lavant APPENDIX 2 - Detailed Assessment of Heritage Assets INTRODUCTION | 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.03 This document will assess whether the above heritage assets should be given special attention in the neighbourhood development plan. 1.01 It has become clear through consultation exercises that Lavant’s heritage is important to people that live and work in the community. Local buildings and their relationship
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District Council
    Chichester District Council Planning Committee Wednesday 06 November 2019 Report of the Director Of Planning and Environment Services Schedule of Planning Appeals, Court and Policy Matters Between 16-Sep-2019 and 16-Oct-2019 This report updates Planning Committee members on current appeals and other matters. It would be of assistance if specific questions on individual cases could be directed to officers in advance of the meeting. Note for public viewing via Chichester District Council web siteTo read each file in detail, including the full appeal decision when it is issued, click on the reference number (NB certain enforcement cases are not open for public inspection, but you will be able to see the key papers via the automatic link to the Planning Inspectorate). * - Committee level decision. 1. NEW APPEALS (Lodged) 19/01425/DOM 36 Manhood Lane, Sidlesham, Chichester, West Sussex Sidlesham Parish PO20 7LT - Retrospective application for single storey rear extension. Case Officer: Oliver Naish Written Representation 19/00845/FUL Common Piece Main Road Birdham West Sussex - Birdham Parish Use of land for the stationing of a static caravan. Case Officer: James Gellini Written Representation 2. DECISIONS MADE Reference/Procedure Proposal 14/00292/CONBC Paddock View Drift Lane Bosham Chichester West Sussex Chidham & Hambrook Parish PO18 8PR - Appeal against CH/55 Case Officer: Shona Archer Informal Hearing 03/10/2019 10:00:00 Chichester Harbour Hotel Appeal Decision: APPEAL WITHDRAWN Following the withdrawal of the enforcement notice(s) on the s.174 appeals (3198721 & 3198722) and s.78 planning appeal (3196089) by the Council and the Appellant's Agent respectively, I confirm no further action will be taking on both sets of appeal(s) above.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of ELECTION CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL 2 MAY 2019 1 Elections Are to Be Held of Councillors for the Following Wards
    NOTICE OF ELECTION CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL 2 MAY 2019 1 Elections are to be held of Councillors for the following Wards :- Ward Number of Councillors to be elected CHICHESTER CENTRAL 1 CHICHESTER EAST 2 CHICHESTER NORTH 2 CHICHESTER SOUTH 2 CHICHESTER WEST 2 EASEBOURNE (Parishes of Easebourne, Heyshott and Lodsworth) 1 FERNHURST (Parishes of Fernhurst, Lurgashall, Linch, Linchmere and Milland) 2 FITTLEWORTH (Parishes of Barlavington, Bignor, Bury, Duncton, East Lavington, 1 Fittleworth, Graffham, Stopham and Sutton) GOODWOOD (Parishes of Boxgrove, Eartham, East Dean, Singleton, Upwaltham, West Dean 1 and Westhampnett) HARBOUR VILLAGES (Parishes of Appledram, Bosham, Chidham, Donnington and 3 Fishbourne) HARTING (Parishes of Elsted & Treyford, Harting, Nyewood, Rogate and Trotton) 1 LAVANT (Parishes of Funtington and Lavant) 1 LOXWOOD (Parishes of Ebernoe, Kirdford, Loxwood, Northchapel, Plaistow & Ifold and 2 Wisborough Green) MIDHURST (Parishes of Bepton, Cocking, Midhurst, Stedham with Iping (Iping Ward), 2 Stedham with Iping (Stedham Ward), West Lavington and Woolbedding with Redford) NORTH MUNDHAM AND TANGMERE (Parishes of Hunston, Tangmere, North Mundham and 2 Oving) PETWORTH (Parishes of Petworth and Tillington) 1 SELSEY SOUTH (Parish of Selsey South Ward) 2 SIDDLESHAM WITH SELSEY NORTH (Parishes of Siddlesham and Selsey North Ward) 2 SOUTHBOURNE (Parish of Southbourne) 2 THE WITTERINGS (Parishes of Birdham, Earnley, East Wittering, Itchenor and West 3 Wittering) WESTBOURNE (Parishes of Compton, Marden, Stoughton and Westbourne) 1 2. Nomination papers may be obtained from the Elections Office at East Pallant House, Chichester, and must be delivered there on any day after the date of this notice but not later than 4PM on Wednesday, 3 APRIL 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Lavant House School
    FREEHOLD On the instructions of Lavant House School Educational Trust Limited in Administration FOR SALE On the instructions of Lavant House School Educational Trust Limited in Administration LAVANT HOUSE SCHOOL WEST LAVANT l CHICHESTER l WEST SUSSEX l PO18 9AB Substantial Grade II Listed country house with ancillary buildings on a site of 5.73 hectares (14.2 acres) Potential for ongoing educational use or alternative uses subject to planning consent PETWORTH PETERSFIELD GUILDFORD A272 MIDHURST Internally the main building provides administration offices, dining facilities, a sizeable music room and some common room facilities on the ground floor. The upper floors have been used mainly for A3 residential accommodation for pupils and staff. A29 Other buildings on the property are summarised in the schedule of accommodation. In addition to the extensive lawns to the south of the main building and the grass sports pitches A286 beyond there are three hard surfaced netball or tennis courts and an open air swimming pool. A3(M) To the west of the main house and adjoining the entrance drive is the main car park. Alongside the car park, on the western boundary of the site, is a compound containing underground gas storage tanks. M27 HAVANT A27 WORTHING BRIGHTON The property includes an area of land, known as the North Paddock, which is located on the opposite CHICHESTER side of the access road running along the north boundary of the site. LITTLEHAMPTON PORTSMOUTH Accommodation BOGNOR REGIS Description sq m sq ft Main House Ground floor 568.7 6,121 Lower mezzanine 225.8 2,431 First and upper mezzanine 433.6 4,667 Location Second floor 263.6 2,837 Lavant House School lies on the western edge of the village of Lavant and approximately 3 miles Basement 65.3 703 north of the city of Chichester in West Sussex.
    [Show full text]
  • AGM Minutes 10/05/17
    WEST DEAN PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Meeting of the Council held on WEDNESDAY 10 MAY 2017 at West Dean College Councillors Present: Cllrs Cochrane, Goacher, Kendall, Odin, Pearmaine, Mrs Pearmaine, Slade In attendance: HL O'Callaghan, Clerk to the Council Cty Cllr Potter, 1. Election of Chairman On the proposal of Cllr Cochrane, seconded by Cllr Pearmaine, it was RESOLVED that Cllr Odin be elected Chairman of the Council for the forthcoming year. Cllr Odin then signed the Declaration of Office. 2. Election of Vice Chairman On the proposal of Kendall, seconded by Cllr Cochrane, it was RESOLVED that Cllr Mrs Slade be elected Vice Chairman of the Council for the forthcoming year. Cllr Mrs Slade then signed the Declaration of Office. 3. Apologies for Absence Apologies received in advance from Cllrs Corbett & Rice, County Cllr Hunt and Alex Barron 4. Code of Conduct (i) Declarations of Interests - None (ii) Dispensations - None 5. Minutes On a proposal by Cllr Kendall seconded by Cllr Goacher it was RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting on 8 March 2017 be approved. They were duly signed as a correct record. 6. County Councillor Hunt submitted the following report Firstly, I would like to thank all those who supported me in the recent County Council elections, and I look forward to working with you all over the next four years. However I would like to assure you all that, whoever you supported, I will continue to represent all of the residents in my division. I must apologise that at the last meeting a query was raised in regard to the broadband supply in Hylters Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestors of Mary Ellen Bone
    Ancestors of Mary Ellen Bone Generation 1 1. Mary Ellen Bone, daughter of Edward Bone and Alice May Richards, was born on 05 Dec 1923 in East Meon, Hampshire, England. She died in 2013 in New Zealand. She married Ernest Arthur Moody on 25 May 1942 in All Saints, East Meon (2408 74 25-May 1942 Ernest Arthur Moody Mary Ellen Bone Married by a NZ chaplain 22 18 Bachelor Spinster Sapper, New Zealand Engineers NAAFI Bereleigh House, East Meon Hambledon Lodge, Leydene, East Meon Arthur Ernest Moody (decease). He was born in New Zealand. More About Mary Ellen Bone: Occupation: May 1942 in East Meon, Hampshire, England; Domestic Servant, NAAFI Generation 2 2. Edward Bone, son of Benjamin Bone and Sarah Knight, was born on 01 Mar 1891 in East Worldham, Hampshire, England. He died about 1950 in Portsmouth, Hampshire, England. He married Alice May Richards. 3. Alice May Richards, daughter of William Walter Richards and Ellen Bridle, was born on 02 Jun 1895 in Sidlesham, Sussex, England. She died in Mar 1971 in Petersfield, Hampshire, England. More About Edward Bone: Military Service: Bet. 1914-1920 Military Service: 30 Sep 1918 in Geluwe, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium; Action Leaading to Distinguished Conduct Medal Occupation: 25 May 1942 in East Meon, Hampshire, England; Lorry Driver Alice May Richards and Edward Bone had the following children: i. Maisie V Bone was born in 1918 in Liss, Hampshire, England. ii. Phyllis Margaret Bone was born on 03 Apr 1920 in East Meon, Hampshire, England. She died in Oct 1989 in Petersfield, Hampshire, England.
    [Show full text]
  • Parking Zone Allocations: Wards in District Or Borough
    Hillside Buckingham Manor Peverel Cokeham Southlands St. Nicolas Mash Barn St. Mary's Southwick Green Eastbrook Marine Widewater Churchill Legend Zone 1 (1) Zone 2 (4) Zone 3 (2) Zone 4 (7) Zone 5 (0) Reproduced from or based upon 2019 Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of the Controller of HMSO © Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to Regional Parking Zone Allocation: Adur District - Appendix C-1 prosecution or civil proceedings West Sussex County Council Licence No. 100023447 1:30,000 ± Arundel & Walberton Angmering & Findon Barnham Ferring Courtwick with Toddington Brookfield Yapton East Preston Felpham East River Beach Rustington West Bersted Rustington East Middleton-on-Sea Hotham Pevensey Orchard Felpham West Pagham Marine Aldwick East Aldwick West Legend Zone 1 (2) Zone 2 (13) Zone 3 (0) Zone 4 (8) Zone 5 (0) Reproduced from or based upon 2019 Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of the Controller of HMSO © Crown Copyright reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to Regional Parking Zone Allocation: Arun District - Appendix C-2 prosecution or civil proceedings West Sussex County Council Licence No. 100023447 1:80,000 ± Fernhurst Loxwood Petworth Easebourne Harting Midhurst Fittleworth Westbourne Goodwood Lavant Chichester North Chichester West Chichester East Chichester Central Chichester South Southbourne Harbour Villages North Mundham & Tangmere The Witterings Sidlesham with Selsey North Legend Selsey South Zone 1 (13) Zone 2 (3) Zone 3 (2) Zone 4 (0) Zone 5 (3) Reproduced from or based upon 2019 Ordnance Survey mapping with permission of the Controller of HMSO © Crown Copyright reserved. Regional Parking Zone Allocation Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings West Sussex County Council Licence No.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbour Villages Ward - Liberal Democrats Campaign Team Chichester Local Plan Review 2035 Submissions
    Harbour Villages Ward - Liberal Democrats Campaign Team Chichester Local plan Review 2035 Submissions Our Observations We wish to be called at the time of the Planning Inspection. This plan appears to have been created in a short time and therefore lacks cohesion. Information used in one area is different to that elsewhere. Points made for: Apuldram/Donnington/Bosham/Chidham/Hambrook/Fishbourne make it appear that they have been written in silos. Can you please look at each one and try and line the reasoning up. Our fear is that this document needs significant change for it to be fit and proper and presentable to the Inspector. 3.1 to 3.2 It is our view that an opportunity has been missed to: 1. Look at new opportunities to develop away from existing settlements 2. Look at innovative solution to develop new dwellings. There is no provision for a. Kit built small homes b. Eco style properties built in a rural environment 3. Choose CDC identified sites rather than be lead by developers 3.4 The plan does insufficient to encourage students or young people to come to Chichester or for them to remain to develop careers. In the report “Know your Place” by BBC Chichester scored very badly. Going out and sports facilities scored zero. Busses scored one. 3.5 We do not accept that the wider plan has taken into account the wider range of environmental aspirations. The size and scope of planned development along the East West corridor damages the environment and fails to enhance the social aspirations of the communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Area Health Deprivation and Disability Score National Rank out Of
    SUSSEX UNCOVERED 2: BRIDGING THE GAP - health deprivation against national rank Ward Area Health Deprivation National Commentary and Disability rank out Within Sussex, eight of the wards have Score of 7,679 health deprivation levels in the top 10% in East Brighton Brighton and Hove 1.29 243wards England (rank below 768). However, this is Queen's Park Brighton and Hove 1.16 360 an improvement on the last IMD where Gensing Hastings 1.14 385 there were 25 wards in the top 10%. This Central St Leonards Hastings 1.13 387 could indicate that wards have become less Baird Hastings 1.05 475 health deprived relative to other areas. In Hollington Hastings 1.05 483 the last IMD, Central St Leonards had the Marine Arun 1.03 514 highest levels of health deprivation in River Arun 0.94 634 Sussex, but this time round East Brighton Castle Hastings 0.84 777 ward in Brighton & Hove has the highest, Wishing Tree Hastings 0.79 849 followed by another Brighton ward (Queens Heene Worthing 0.77 903 Park). Tressell Hastings 0.77 908 Central Worthing 0.76 916 Moulsecoomb and Bevendean Brighton and Hove 0.72 996 Sidley Rother 0.67 1101 Ore Hastings 0.63 1176 This information was produced by Grant Ham Arun 0.61 1220 Thornton UK LLP for Sussex Community Hampden Park Eastbourne 0.61 1228 Foundation 2016. It is taken from the Central Rother 0.60 1253 Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD 2015), Devonshire Eastbourne 0.60 1255 English Indices of Multiple Deprivation, Maze Hill Hastings 0.57 1315 Department for Communities and Local Pevensey Arun 0.56 1342 Government, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Home with South Facing Garden
    Contemporary home with south facing garden Fordwater, East Lavant Freehold Reception hall • Kitchen/living room • Three further reception rooms • Master bedroom suite • Four additional bedrooms • Two bath/shower rooms • Garden with terrace • Spectacular views over the Goodwood Estate Description The downstairs Built in 2016, Fordwater accommodation on the represents a superb adjacent side of the house contemporary home with features two bedrooms, two well-proportioned rooms and reception rooms and a shower generous living spaces, room. With its own entrance, situated in the sought after this part of the house could be village of Lavant. The property used as an annexe for relatives represents a rare opportunity or guests, with relevant to live within the world services already in situ. renowned Goodwood Estate. The first floor is accessed via The ground floor features a a wide oak staircase, The large and welcoming reception impressive master bedroom hall with high ceilings and an enjoys its own balcony, a walk area currently presented for in wardrobe and en suite dining. shower room. On this floor Of note is the well appointed there are two further bedrooms modern open plan kitchen/ and a family bath and shower living room measuring over room. 32ft. Bi-fold doors extend the length of the room and open on Outside to a terrace ideal for The low maintenance south entertaining in the summer facing gardens comprise areas months. The bespoke kitchen of level lawn and pleasant has been designed to the seating areas enjoying the highest standards with a views of neighbouring central island/breakfast bar, a farmland belonging to the range of integrated appliances, Goodwood Estate.
    [Show full text]