DOCSLIB.ORG

Grapevine Rootstocks & Emerging Varieties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grapevine Rootstocks & Emerging Varieties 6/5/2018 Grapevine Rootstocks & Emerging Varieties Jim Kamas Assoc. Professor & Extension Specialist Texas A&M Agrilife Extension Viticulture & Fruit Lab Fredericksburg, TX What is a Rootstock And Why Do We Need Them? • A rootstock is a genetically distinct form of a plant joined to a scion by budding or grafting to overcome soil limitations or impart/restrict plant vigor 1 6/5/2018 Grapevines Commonly Propagated Through Bench Grafting Scion budding#.UnUKKPnks6o ‐ Rootstock http://www.extension.org/pages/32924/chip 2 6/5/2018 Rootstock Selection VITIS RIPARIA RUPESTRIS BERLANDIERI RIPARIA x RIPARIA x RUPESTRIS x RUPESTRIS BERLANDIERI BERLANDIERI 3309C, 3306C, 101‐14 Mgt, SO4, 5BB, 5C, 110R, 99R Schwarzmann 420A, 161‐49 1103P, 140 Ru What Challenges Can Rootstocks Help Overcome for Texas Grape Growers? • Pierce’s Disease • Nutrient Uptake in High pH Soils • V. berlandieri hybrids • Soil‐borne Threats • Cotton Root Rot • Nematodes • Phylloxera • Vigor Control • Fertile or Limiting Site? • Other Soil Limitations • Sodic Soils & Water • Drought 3 6/5/2018 Tow Rootstock Trial Vine Response Parameters • PD Symptom Ratings • Annual Dormant Pruning Weights • ELISA Testing (Optical Density) Vines Were Planted in 2005, Measurements Taken 2005, 2006, 2007 with Final Pruning Weights Taken Spring, 2008 Diversity of Response‐ Annual Pruning Weights 4000 3500 3000 (g) 2500 Weight 2000 1500 2006 Pruned 1000 2007 500 0 4 6/5/2018 Diversity of Response‐ ELISA Values 2.5 11/7/2005 2 10/30/2006 11/5/2007 1.5 1 0.5 0 Diversity of Response‐ Visual Disease Ratings 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 5 40% 4 30% 3 20% 2 10% 1 0% PD symptom scores in 2007: 1 lowest –5 dead 5 6/5/2018 Expanded Rootstock Trials Root Systems Evaluated GRN-1 GRN-2 GRN-3 GRN-4 GRN-5 Florilush 5BB Own-Rooted Dogridge 1103P Salt Creek 5C Rootstock trial sites: • ‘Sangiovese’ • Leakey • Stonewall • ‘Blanc du Bois’ • Industry Fairly Large Scale Replicated Plots 6 6/5/2018 Data Collected • Annual Pruning Weights • Phenology • Fruit Chemistry • Visual Nutrient Deficiency Ratings • Bloom and 70 Day Post Bloom Petiole Analysis Table 3. Pruning weights for the Gillespie County and Real County. Pruning Weight (kg) Gillespie County Real County 2012b 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012 2013 2014 Rootstock FL 0.53ac 0.58a 0.83ab 1.20a 1.16bd 0.13bc 0.32df 0.12cd DR 0.44ab 0.47ac 0.82ab 1.21a 1.21ac 0.19ab 0.83a 0.53a 3P 0.39ac 0.43ac 0.58be 0.84bd 0.90ce 0.13bc 0.40ce 0.17cd G3 0.39ac 0.55ab 0.73ac 1.10ab 1.59a 0.14ac 0.42ce 0.15cd G1 0.39ac 0.38c 0.62ae 0.82cd 0.81de 0.15ac 0.22ef 0.06d G2 0.38ac 0.45ac 0.67ad 1.17ab 1.39ab 0.11cd 0.73ab 0.24bc G4 0.37ac 0.43ac 0.55ce 0.78cd 0.97ce 0.01cd 0.18f 0.1d SC 0.36ac 0.41bc 0.85a 1.29a 1.45ab 0.14bc 0.41ce 0.25bc 5B 0.31bc 0.37c 0.78ac 1.18a 0.66e 0.18ab 0.54bd 0.31b 5C 0.26c 0.34c 0.55ce 1.02ad 0.94ce 0.21a 0.55bc 0.35b SV 0.22c 0.34c 0.44de 0.70d 0.90ce 0.05d 0.17f 0.04d G5 ‐d 0.07d 0.4e 0.77cd 0.90ce ‐ 0.11f 0.05d Siga *** *** *** *** *** * *** *** a ns, *, **, *** indicate not significant, and statistically significant at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels of probability respectively. b Fischer’s least significant difference test. c means followed by different letters are significantly different. d 7 6/5/2018 Table 3. Pruning weights for the Gillespie County and Real County. Pruning Weight (kg) Gillespie County Real County 2012b 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012 2013 2014 Rootstock FL 0.53ac 0.58a 0.83ab 1.20a 1.16bd 0.13bc 0.32df 0.12cd DR 0.44ab 0.47ac 0.82ab 1.21a 1.21ac 0.19ab 0.83a 0.53a 3P 0.39ac 0.43ac 0.58be 0.84bd 0.90ce 0.13bc 0.40ce 0.17cd G3 0.39ac 0.55ab 0.73ac 1.10ab 1.59a 0.14ac 0.42ce 0.15cd G1 0.39ac 0.38c 0.62ae 0.82cd 0.81de 0.15ac 0.22ef 0.06d G2 0.38ac 0.45ac 0.67ad 1.17ab 1.39ab 0.11cd 0.73ab 0.24bc G4 0.37ac 0.43ac 0.55ce 0.78cd 0.97ce 0.01cd 0.18f 0.1d SC 0.36ac 0.41bc 0.85a 1.29a 1.45ab 0.14bc 0.41ce 0.25bc 5B 0.31bc 0.37c 0.78ac 1.18a 0.66e 0.18ab 0.54bd 0.31b 5C 0.26c 0.34c 0.55ce 1.02ad 0.94ce 0.21a 0.55bc 0.35b SV 0.22c 0.34c 0.44de 0.70d 0.90ce 0.05d 0.17f 0.04d G5 ‐d 0.07d 0.4e 0.77cd 0.90ce ‐ 0.11f 0.05d Siga *** *** *** *** *** * *** *** a ns, *, **, *** indicate not significant, and statistically significant at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels of probability respectively. b Fischer’s least significant difference test. c means followed by different letters are significantly different. d Table 3. Pruning weights for the Gillespie County and Real County. Pruning Weight (kg) Gillespie County Real County 2012b 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012 2013 2014 Rootstock FL 0.53ac 0.58a 0.83ab 1.20a 1.16bd 0.13bc 0.32df 0.12cd DR 0.44ab 0.47ac 0.82ab 1.21a 1.21ac 0.19ab 0.83a 0.53a 3P 0.39ac 0.43ac 0.58be 0.84bd 0.90ce 0.13bc 0.40ce 0.17cd G3 0.39ac 0.55ab 0.73ac 1.10ab 1.59a 0.14ac 0.42ce 0.15cd G1 0.39ac 0.38c 0.62ae 0.82cd 0.81de 0.15ac 0.22ef 0.06d G2 0.38ac 0.45ac 0.67ad 1.17ab 1.39ab 0.11cd 0.73ab 0.24bc G4 0.37ac 0.43ac 0.55ce 0.78cd 0.97ce 0.01cd 0.18f 0.1d SC 0.36ac 0.41bc 0.85a 1.29a 1.45ab 0.14bc 0.41ce 0.25bc 5B 0.31bc 0.37c 0.78ac 1.18a 0.66e 0.18ab 0.54bd 0.31b 5C 0.26c 0.34c 0.55ce 1.02ad 0.94ce 0.21a 0.55bc 0.35b SV 0.22c 0.34c 0.44de 0.70d 0.90ce 0.05d 0.17f 0.04d G5 ‐d 0.07d 0.4e 0.77cd 0.90ce ‐ 0.11f 0.05d Siga *** *** *** *** *** * *** *** a ns, *, **, *** indicate not significant, and statistically significant at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels of probability respectively. b Fischer’s least significant difference test. c means followed by different letters are significantly different. d 8 6/5/2018 Vigor 2013‐2014 2013 Pruned Weights (lbs.) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 SV G1 G4 G3 3P SC FL G2 5B 5C DR Mortality to Cotton Root Rot In Real County 5B 4 5C 0 DR 2 FL 6 G1 62 G2 6 G3 18 G4 12 G5 44 RM 4 SV 8 3P 4 % Death Due to CRR 9 6/5/2018 Industry, Texas Planted in Fall 2012 • Scion: Vitis spp. cv. ‘Blanc Du Bois’ • Cuero Loam • Soil pH: 8.2 • 2.7’ x 1.8m, Geneva Double Curtain 10 6/5/2018 Common Reported CRR Nematode Rootstocks Tolerance Resistance 1103 Paulsen Dogridge UCD GRN-1 Kober 5BB Salt Creek (Ramsey) UCD GRN-2 Teleki 5C Florilush UCD GRN-3 Own UCD GRN-4 UCD GRN-5 Pruning Weight (2014) 1.6 2014 P > f 1.4 0.01 1.2 A A A (kg) 1.0 A A A AB AB A 0.8 AB Weight 0.6 B 0.4 Pruning 0.2 0.0 G1 G3 DR G4 Own G2 G5 5C 3P 5B SC Rootstock 11 6/5/2018 Pruning Weight (2015) 1.6 2015 P > f 0.01 1.4 1.2 A (kg) 1.0 AB AB AB AB AB 0.8 AB B B Weight B 0.6 0.4 C Pruning 0.2 0.0 G1 G3 DR G4 Own G2 G5 5C 3P 5B SC Rootstock Soluble Solids (2015) 22 2015 P > f 0.05 21 20 (°Brix) AA 19 AB AB 18 AB Solids AC AC AC 17 BC BC Soluble 16 C 15 G3 DR G4 SC G5 5B 5C 3P G2 Own G1 Rootstock 12 6/5/2018 Juice pH (2015) 3.70 2015 P > f 0.05 3.60 3.50 A AB 3.40 AB AB AB pH AB AB AB B 3.30 B Juice 3.20 3.10 3.00 G3 5C SC 3P G5 G4 5B G1 G2 Own Rootstock Pruning Weight (2016) 1.6 P > f 0.01 A A 2016 1.4 A A A A 1.2 AB A (kg) AB 1.0 AB 0.8 Weight 0.6 0.4 B Pruning 0.2 0.0 G1 G3 DR G4 Own G2 G5 5C 3P 5B SC Rootstock 13 6/5/2018 Average Berry Weight (2016) 2.7 P > f 0.01 A A 2.5 A A A A AB AB AB (g) 2.3 2.1 B Weight 1.9 Berry 1.7 1.5 G5 SC 3P 5C 5B G2 DR G4 G3 Own Rootstock Average Cluster Weight (2016) 140 P > f 0.01 130 (g) A A AB 120 AB AC Weight 110 AC Cluster 100 AC AC BC 90 C 80 G5 SC 3P 5C 5B G2 DR G4 G3 Own Rootstock 14 6/5/2018 Projected Yield (2016) 4.5 A A P > f 0.01 4.0 A A AB 3.5 AB AB AB 3.0 AB 2.5 acre B / 2.0 Tons 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 3P DR SC G3 5C G4 5B G2 G5 Own Rootstock Soluble Solids (2016) 22 2016 P > f 0.01 21 A A 20 AC AC AC AC AC (°Brix) BC 19 BC 18 Solids C 17 Soluble 16 15 G3 DR G4 SC G5 5B 5C 3P G2 Own G1 Rootstock 15 6/5/2018 Juice pH (2016) 3.70 2016 P > f 0.05 3.60 A AB A AB AB AB AB 3.50 AB B 3.40 pH 3.30 Juice 3.20 3.10 3.00 G3 5C SC 3P G5 G4 5B G1 G2 Own Rootstock Titratable Acidity (2015‐2016) 9 a 2015 P > f 0.34 a 8 a ab 2016 P > f 0.03 ab 7 ab ab ab A A ab A A (g/L) A A A A 6 A A A b 5 Acidity 4 3 2 Titratable 1 0 Own5CG23PG5G3SCDR5BG4G1 Rootstock 16 6/5/2018 Same Variety, Same Day Photos Bri Hoge Emerging Varieties? 17 6/5/2018 Geographic Illusion “You know, we went to Bordeaux/Tuscany on vacation, and parts of Texas are exactly like that.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 11 ) LAKELAND TOURS, LLC, Et Al.,1 ) Case No
    20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 1 of 105 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) LAKELAND TOURS, LLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-11647 (JLG) ) Debtors. ) Jointly Administered ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, Julian A. Del Toro, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned case. On September 25, 2020, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following document to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A, via electronic mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B, and on three (3) confidential parties not listed herein: Notice of Filing Third Amended Plan Supplement (Docket No. 200) Notice of (I) Entry of Order (I) Approving the Disclosure Statement for and Confirming the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Lakeland Tours, LLC and Its Debtor Affiliates and (II) Occurrence of the Effective Date to All (Docket No. 201) [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] ________________________________________ 1 A complete list of each of the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ proposed claims and noticing agent at https://cases.stretto.com/WorldStrides. The location of the Debtors’ service address in these chapter 11 cases is: 49 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036. 20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 2 of 105 20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 3 of 105 Exhibit A 20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 4 of 105 Exhibit A Served via First-Class Mail Name Attention Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 City State Zip Country Aaron Joseph Borenstein Trust Address Redacted Attn: Benjamin Mintz & Peta Gordon & Lucas B.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 GRAPE DISEASE CONTROL, 2015 After a 1-Year Hiatus, It's Time Once
    GRAPE DISEASE CONTROL, 2015 Wayne F. Wilcox, Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, NY State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva NY 14456 ([email protected]) After a 1-year hiatus, it’s time once again for the (almost) annual update and review on controlling the fungal diseases that grape growers must regularly contend with in our eastern climate. As always, I’d like to acknowledge the outstanding team of grape pathologists here in Geneva, which includes bacteriologists (Tom Burr’s program) and virologists (Marc Fuchs’s program) in addition to those of us who work on fungal diseases: faculty colleagues and cooperators (David Gadoury, Bob Seem, Lance-Cadle-Davidson); research technicians (including the phoenix-like Duane Riegel, Dave Combs, and Judy Burr); and graduate students and post-docs too numerous to mention here. It truly is the combined research efforts of all of these people that serve as the basis for most of the following. THE WINTER FROM HELL We won’t dwell upon it, but there are going to be some consequences this coming season as a result of our recently-concluded (or so it’s starting to appear) WFH. It’s beyond the scope of this screed to discuss and sometimes lament many of the more obvious issues, but there are a couple of disease-related points that are worth covering briefly: • Phomopsis infection of new suckers. This issue falls into the “observation/speculation” category rather than one that contains relatively well-established facts. That being said, the last time (2004) that upstate NY had winter temperatures that killed top wood in a significant number of locations, I (and others) noticed that sucker growth destined to become new trunks developed an awful lot of Phomopsis infection during the early growing season.
    [Show full text]
  • Wine Grape Variety Trial for Maritime Western Washington 2000-2008
    Summary of Results: Wine Grape Variety Trial for Maritime Western Washington 2000-2008 Wine Grape Cultivar Trials 2000-2008 in the Cool Maritime Climate of Western WA Gary Moulton, Carol Miles, Jacqueline King, and Charla Echlin WSU Mount Vernon NWREC 16650 State Route 536, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Tel. 360-848-6150 Email [email protected] http://extension.wsu.edu/maritimefruit/Pages/default.aspx Wines produced from grapes grown in cool climate regions have generally low alcohol content, low viscosity, and high fruit aromas and flavor (Casteel, 1992; Jackson and Schuster, 1977; Zoecklein, 1998). Certain varietals from Germany, Austria Russia, Hungary, and Armenia, as well as some common French varieties such as Pinot Noir and Pinot Gris can produce excellent fruity wines in western Washington. Selection of the right clone is important and knowing the heat units of your site will greatly aid in the selection of which varieties to grow. The cool maritime region of western Washington is on the very low end of the spectrum with respect to the number of growing degree days (GDD) needed for ripening the more common wine grape cultivars. Although the Puget Sound region has a long growing season in terms of frost free days, mesoclimates within the area range from below 1200 GDD to 2200 GDD. The Washington State University Mount Vernon Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center (WSU Mount Vernon NWREC) research site is located at 12 feet above sea level in the Skagit Valley floodplain, 3 miles from the Puget Sound. Since 2002, annual GDD averaged 1693; in 2003 there was a spike in GDD of 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Winemaker International Amateur Wine Competition 2,305 Entries Judged April 12-14, 2019 in West Dover, Vermont 2,305
    2019 WineMaker International Amateur Wine Competition 2,305 entries judged April 12-14, 2019 in West Dover, Vermont 2,305.......................... entries aroma, taste, aftertaste and overall impression. The wines were entered in 50 different categories and included an astonishing 464.......................wine flights array of varietals and wine styles. Kit wines competed alongside 673............. total judging hours fresh-grape entries in this blind tasting. Entries were awarded 50................... American states gold, silver, bronze and best of show medals based on the aver- age score given by the judging panel. The Gene Spaziani Grand 5............... Canadian provinces Champion Wine award was the top overall scoring wine across 6............................. Countries all categories. The Club of the Year was given to the club whose members won the most medals and the Retailer of the Year and U-Vint of the Year awards were given to the winemaking sup- rom April 12 to 14, 2019, a total of 2,305 different ply stores whose customers outperformed other similar shops. wines were judged at the Grand Summit Lodge and Finally the Winemaker of the Year award was given to the indi- Conference Center at Mount Snow Resort in West vidual entrant who has the highest average score across their F Dover, Vermont. This year’s competition was again top 5 scoring wines in the competition. the largest wine competition of its kind in the world. The 2,305 Congratulations to everyone who won a medal, and a sincere entries arrived from hobby winemakers living throughout North thanks to our sponsors, Competition Director Ric Quental, Events America in all 50 American states and 5 Canadian provinces and Manager Jannell Kristiansen, our judges, competition volunteers, as far away as Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Downy Mildew Resistance Evaluation in 28 Grapevine Hybrids Promising for Breeding Programs in Trentino Region (Italy)
    Eur J Plant Pathol (2018) 150:485–495 DOI 10.1007/s10658-017-1298-2 Downy mildew resistance evaluation in 28 grapevine hybrids promising for breeding programs in Trentino region (Italy) Silvia Vezzulli & Antonella Vecchione & Marco Stefanini & Luca Zulini Accepted: 13 July 2017 /Published online: 31 July 2017 # Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2017 Abstract Downy mildew is a major grapevine disease assisted breeding programs which promote sustainable caused by the biotrophic oomycete, Plasmopara viticulture. viticola. Numerous disease resistance studies of diverse Vitis germplasm have been previously carried out to Keywords Plasmopara viticola . Vitis spp. Disease identify downy mildew resistance sources; however, symptom assessment . Weather effect ratings were mainly reported using leaf disc in vitro testing and foliage field assessment, or upon leaf and cluster field evaluations. In the current study, 28 grape- Introduction vine hybrid cultivars were screened using leaf disc bio- assay, for disease resistance characterization of both Downy mildew (DM) is a major grapevine disease existing and wild-collected materials. 16 hybrids were caused by the biotrophic oomycete, Plasmopara viticola identified as highly resistant or resistant, and will serve (Berk. and Curt.) Berl. & de Toni. The classic cultivars as relevant resistance donors in future pre-breeding and for wine, table grape and raisin production belong to the breeding programs. All grapevine hybrids were evalu- Vitis species widely spread in Europe and Asia Minor, ated for foliar and cluster downy mildew resistance in an Vitis vinifera L., and are susceptible to this pathogen untreated field trial over three successive years. This (Deglène-Benbrahim et al. 2010). P. viticola infects all study showed that the leaf disc bioassay provided some green parts of the vine, leaves and bunches in particular information on the resistance level of the genotypes (Ingram 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Primarne Arome Grožđa Izabranih Bijelih Sorata Dobivenih Međuvrsnim Križanjem
    Primarne arome grožđa izabranih bijelih sorata dobivenih međuvrsnim križanjem Peršin, Filip Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2017 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Agronomski fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:204:151681 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-27 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository Faculty of Agriculture University of Zagreb SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU AGRONOMSKI FAKULTET PRIMARNE AROMA GROŽĐA IZABRANIH BIJELIH SORATA DOBIVENIH MEĐUVRSNIM KRIŽANJEM DIPLOMSKI RAD Filip Peršin Zagreb, srpanj, 2017. SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU AGRONOMSKI FAKULTET Diplomski studij: Hortikultura PRIMARNE AROMA GROŽĐA IZABRANIH BIJELIH SORATA DOBIVENIH MEĐUVRSNIM KRIŽANJEM DIPLOMSKI RAD Filip Peršin Mentor: doc. dr. sc. Luna Maslov-Bandić Zagreb, srpanj, 2017. SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU AGRONOMSKI FAKULTET IZJAVA STUDENTA O AKADEMSKOJ ČESTITOSTI Ja, Filip Peršin, JMBAG 0178087177, rođen/a dana 04.06.1991. u Sisku, izjavljujem da sam samostalno izradila/izradio diplomski rad pod naslovom: PRIMARNE AROMA GROŽĐA IZABRANIH BIJELIH SORATA DOBIVENIH MEĐUVRSNIM KRIŽANJEM Svojim potpisom jamčim: da sam jedina autorica/jedini autor ovoga diplomskog rada; da su svi korišteni izvori literature, kako objavljeni tako i neobjavljeni, adekvatno citirani ili parafrazirani, te popisani u literaturi na kraju rada; da ovaj diplomski rad ne sadrži dijelove radova predanih na Agronomskom fakultetu
    [Show full text]
  • Booklet by Class
    2018 Florida State Fair International Wine and Grape Juice Competition Medal Winners by Class AN "X" IN FRONT OF THE MEDAL INDICATES DOUBLE GOLD: Apple, Pear or Blends Ackerman Winery, Amana IA NV Cranberry & Apple SILVER Flickerwood Wine Cellars, Kane PA NV Pear X GOLD Prairie Berry Winery, Hill City SD NV Razzy Apple GOLD Blackberry Ackerman Winery, Amana IA NV Blackberry GOLD Arrowhead Wine Cellars, North East PA NV Blackberry SILVER Flickerwood Wine Cellars, Kane PA NV Flickerberry Dew SILVER Flickerwood Wine Cellars, Kane PA NV Bruiser SILVER Holy-Field Vineyard & Winery, Basehor KS NV Yogi Berry Blackberry SILVER St. James Winery, St. James MO 2017 Blackberry Blueberry SILVER St. James Winery, St. James MO 2017 Blackberry SILVER True Blue Winery, Davenport FL 2017 Blackberry BRONZE Blended Fruit/Grape - Red Falling Waters Winery, Crivitz WI NV Kick in the Berries BRONZE Murielle Winery Inc., Clearwater FL NV Black Raspberry Merlot SILVER Blended Fruit/Grape - Rosé Island Grove Wine Company, Hawthorne FL NV Blueberry Moscato BRONZE Prairie Berry Winery, Hill City SD NV Strawberry Fusion BRONZE Prairie Berry Winery, Hill City SD NV Pomegranate Fusion BRONZE Blended Fruit/Grape - White Murielle Winery Inc., Clearwater FL NV Peach Apricot Chardonnay SILVER Blueberry Florida Orange Groves, Inc., St. Petersburg FL NA Blueberry Blue SILVER Island Grove Wine Company, Hawthorne FL NV Estate Bottled Kinda Dry Blueberry SILVER Island Grove Wine Company, Hawthorne FL NV Estate Bottled Sorta Sweet Blueberry SILVER Presque Isle Wine Cellars,
    [Show full text]
  • Varietal Response to Sour Bunch Rot in Polish Grapevine Genetic Resources
    agronomy Article Varietal Response to Sour Bunch Rot in Polish Grapevine Genetic Resources Jerzy Lisek * and Anna Lisek The National Institute of Horticultural Research, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3 Str., 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the resistance to sour rot of twenty-eight valuable cultivars of grapevine for wine production and twenty-five cultivars of table grapevine with diverse geographic and genetic origins, and to explain the causes of varied resistance based on the features related to the morphology, biology and ecology of assessed genotypes. The study was conducted for six years in the grapevine field collection of the National Institute of Horticultural Research in Skierniewice (Poland, latitude 51.9627 N, longitude 20.1666 E). Sour rot was severe in three seasons with abundant rainfall during the berry ripening stage. The number of wine and table cultivars in particular classes of resistance (mean value for three years) was as follows: very little or little—9 (wine) and 9 (table), medium—9 (wine) and 3 (table), high or very high—10 (wine) and 13 (table). The severity of bunch sour rot was positively correlated with single berry weight (moderate or weak correlation), bunch density and single bunch weight (very weak or weak correlation), and negatively correlated with thickness of berry skin (strong correlation) and the time of the beginning of veraison (weak correlation). Cultivars that were characterized by such agrobiological and ecological features as easy detachment of the berry from the pedicel, sensitivity to berry skin cracking, frequent damage to the skin by insects, and sensitivity to sunburn, were more heavily exposed to sour rot.
    [Show full text]
  • The 7Th "SAKURA" Japan Women's Wine Awards 2020 Results *Explanation for “Award” / DG:Double Gold G:Gold S:Silver Categ Wine No
    2020_RESULTS_EN_ALL *For data search, Ctrl + F The 7th "SAKURA" Japan Women's Wine Awards 2020 Results *Explanation for “Award” / DG:Double Gold G:Gold S:Silver Categ Wine No. Award Producer Wine Name Country Region % Variety 1 % Variety 2 Importer or Distributor ory Still ANGULO INNOCENTI CABERNET 17238 S ANGULO INNOCENTI ARGENTINA CUYO 100% CABERNET SAUVIGNON VINOS YAMAZAKI CO.,LTD. Red SAUVIGNON 2018 Still 16184 DG ARGANA EXPRESION - SYRAH 2017 ARGENTINA CUYO 100% SYRAH n.a. / open market Red Still 18145 S ARGENTO ARGENTO MALBEC 2018 ARGENTINA CUYO 100% MALBEC MIKUNI WINE CO.,LTD. Red Still 18143 G ARGENTO ARGENTO RESERVA MALBEC 2016 ARGENTINA CUYO 100% MALBEC MIKUNI WINE CO.,LTD. Red Still 14598 S BODEGA CATENA ZAPATA CATENA CHARDONNAY 2018 ARGENTINA CUYO 100% CHARDONNAY FWINES CO.,LTD. White Still 14597 DG BODEGA CATENA ZAPATA CATENA MALBEC 2017 ARGENTINA CUYO 100% MALBEC FWINES CO.,LTD. Red Still 17467 G BODEGA NORTON CABERNET SAUVIGNON RESERVA 2017 ARGENTINA CUYO 100% CABERNET SAUVIGNON ENOTECA CO.,LTD. Red Still 17466 S BODEGA NORTON CHARDONNAY RESERVA 2019 ARGENTINA CUYO 100% CHARDONNAY ENOTECA CO.,LTD. White Still 17463 G BODEGA NORTON GERNOT LANGES 2015 ARGENTINA CUYO 60% MALBEC 30% CABERNET SAUVIGNON ENOTECA CO.,LTD. Red Still 17464 G BODEGA NORTON LO TENGO TORRONTES 2019 ARGENTINA CUYO 100% TORRONTES ENOTECA CO.,LTD. White Still 17465 G BODEGA NORTON MALBEC RESERVA 2017 ARGENTINA CUYO 100% MALBEC ENOTECA CO.,LTD. Red Still 17462 S BODEGA NORTON PRIVADA 2016 ARGENTINA CUYO 40% MALBEC 30% MERLOT ENOTECA CO.,LTD. Red Still MURAGUCHI SHOTEN 15614 G BODEGA TAPIZ TAPIZ ALTA COLLECTION MARBEC 2013 ARGENTINA CUYO 100% MALBEC Red CO.,LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No
    L 344/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.11.2014 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1271/2014 of 28 November 2014 authorising an increase of the limits for the enrichment of wine produced using the grapes harvested in 2014 from certain wine grape varieties in certain wine-growing regions or a part thereof THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 91 thereof, Whereas: (1) Point A.3 of Part I of Annex VIII to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 provides that Member States may request that the limits for increasing the alcoholic strength (enrichment) of wine by volume be raised by up to 0,5 % in years in which climatic conditions have been exceptionally unfavourable. (2) Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, France, Croatia, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia have requested such increases of the limits for enrichment of the wine produced using the grapes harvested in the year 2014, as climatic conditions during the growing season have been exceptionally un­ favourable. Such request has been made by Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Croatia, Hungary, Austria, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia for all their wine-growing regions. Belgium made the request for one region, Germany for some regions and parts of the regions of Mosel and Saale-Unstrut, France for some communes within the depart­ ments of Aude and Hérault, and Italy for some regions in the North and Centre of Italy and a PDO area in the regions of Umbria and Lazio.
    [Show full text]
  • 11Th Anniversary Ladies Night Benefit For
    Holy-Field Vineyard & Winery 18807 158th Street 158th Street & 24/40 Highway Holy-Field Vineyard & Winery Basehor, KS 66007 2017 AWARDS 913-724-WINE (9463) Florida International Wine Competition www.holyfieldwinery.com Racy Red - Double Gold • Amitie- Double Gold Vignoles - Silver • Valvin Muscat - Silver Late Harvest Vignoles - Silver wine line Seyval - Bronze • Tailgate White - Bronze International Eastern Wine Competition Amitie - Best of Class Double Gold Tailgate White - Silver 18807 158th Street A Newsletter for Friends of Holy-Field Late Harvest Vignoles - Silver • Chambourcin - Silver 913-724-WINE (9463) 158th Street & 24/40 Highway Corky’s Barrel - Bronze • Tailgate Red - Bronze Basehor, KS 66007 www.holyfieldwinery.com Holy-Field Vineyard & Winery (est. 1994) Spring 2011 Jefferson Cup National Wine Competition Holy-Field Vineyard & Winery (est. 1994) Spring 2018 Vignoles - Jefferson Cup • Raspberry - Double Gold Tailgate White - Gold • Chambourcin - Silver 11th Anniversary Ladies Night Benefit Yogi Berrry Blackberry - Silver • Corky’s Barrel - Silver for Safe Harbor Dogs Valvin Muscat- Silver Finger Lakes International Wine Competition “Woof, Woof for Wine” Yogi Berry Blackberry - Best of Show Fruit Wine Late Harvest Vignoles - Gold • Chambourcin - Silver Thursday, May 24, 2018, 6-9pm $25.00 tickets Corky’s Barrel - Silver • Tailgate Red - Silver (Rain Date is Thursday, May 31st) Raspberry - Silver U U U U U U U U U U Online ticket sales only Pacific Rim International Wine Competition Tickets go on sale on Thursday, April 19th at 10:00 a.m. Valvin Muscat - Best of Class/Double Gold https://2018safeharbordogs.brownpapertickets.com Late Harvest Vignoles - Silver Amitie - Silver You are in for some “Dog Gone” good fun at our 11th Annual Due to space limitations we sell a limited number of tickets.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 222/Thursday, November 17, 2016
    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 81023 (g) Inspection and Corrective Actions approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps, ADDRESSES: Please send your comments Within 12 months after the effective date including substeps and identified figures, can on this proposed rule to one of the of this AD: Do a detailed inspection of the still be done as specified, and the airplane following addresses: area above the A2 and A3 galleys to make can be put back in an airworthy condition. • Internet: https:// sure the hardware (i.e., pin assembly or bolt (j) Related Information www.regulations.gov (via the online assembly) that connects the tripod mount (1) For more information about this AD, comment form for this notice as posted assembly to the applicable T53 and T52 tie within Docket No. TTB–2016–0011 at rods is installed, and do all applicable contact Eric Brown, Aerospace Engineer, corrective actions, in accordance with the Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems ‘‘Regulations.gov,’’ the Federal e- Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft rulemaking portal); Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert • Service Bulletin 777–25A0677, dated April Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue U.S. Mail: Director, Regulations and 25, 2016. Do all applicable corrective actions SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425– Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco before further flight. 917–6476; fax: 425–917–6590; email: Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street [email protected]. (h) Definition of Detailed Inspection NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; or (2) For service information identified in • Hand delivery/courier in lieu of For the purposes of this AD, a detailed this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data mail: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and inspection is an intensive examination of a Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Suite specific item, installation, or assembly to Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., detect damage, failure, or irregularity.
    [Show full text]