INSTITUTION SPONS AGENCY BUREAU NO PUB DATE EDRS PRICE DESCRIPTORS ABSTRACT a Study of Lay Participation in the Public Southwest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INSTITUTION SPONS AGENCY BUREAU NO PUB DATE EDRS PRICE DESCRIPTORS ABSTRACT a Study of Lay Participation in the Public Southwest ED 056 401 24 EA 003 841 .AUTHOR Coy, Roger L. TITLE A study of Lay Participation in the Public Schools. INSTITUTION Southwestern Ohio Educational Research Council, Inc. Middletown. SPONS AGENCY National Center for Educational Research and Development (DHE4/CE); Washington; D.C. BUREAU NO BR-6-2393 PUB DATE hug 69 GRANT DEG-0-9-452393-4506 NOTE 97p.; Submitted in partial fulfillment of research internship, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio EDRS PRICE ME-$0.65 HC-t3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Board of Education Policy; Boards of Education; _ase Studies (Education); *Citizen Participation; Community Organizations; *Community Role; Guidelines; *Laymen; *Parent Participation; School Community Programs; School Community Relat.i.onship IDENTIFIERS Community School Councils ABSTRACT This thesis focuses on the feasibility of using community school councils as-tools for increasing lay partLcipation in school planning. The report describes community school councils as either those lay groups recognized and encouraged by the school, or the independent committees 3pawned by conditions in the community. Guidelines are provided fot establishing community schooI councils on either a permanent or an ad.hoc basis and for assuring that participation in such councils is effective. Included are case studies of citizen participation in Baltimore, Maryland and in Dayton, Ohio. (JF) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG- INATING IT. POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN- IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICL OF EDU- CATION POSITION OR POLICY A STUDY OF LAY PARTICIPATION IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Presented to Dr. Robert J. Simpson Miami University in partial fulfillment c a research int-nship: Miami U_ v- -sity Southwestern Ohio Educational Research Coun i_ Inc. An Ohio Corporation Not For ProfL, 1212 Oxford State Road IMiddletown-_ Ohio 45042 Area CJde'523 422-7663 by Roger L. Coy August 1969 The work presented herein.was performed pursuant to a grant from the U. S. Office of Education Department of Health, Education and Welfare ACKNUAE EMENTS Individuals and their contributions to this study are Dr. Eldon Wiley, SWOERC Director9 for personalencourage- ment and guidance plus supervision of this proj et; Dr. James Giedts, Associate Professor of EducauionAdministration, agd Universit, for the opportunity to vi it the Flint, Mi higan community schJols; Dr0 Jeptha Carrell,Director of Community Research, Inc., Dayton, Ohio,for the opportunity to participate in the "Charette" in BaltimoreMaryland; James Polley, Professor of Education Administration, ami University, for providing opportunitiss to work with Dayton Model Cities personnel; Mr. Charles Rivers, Edison Elementary School Pri cipal, for informationabout community- school council election procedures; Hr. Joel PosnerEValua- tion Sup3rvieor9 City of Dayton9 for providing thebackground information in the Dayton Case Study throughthe report by the Department of Housing and Urban Development;Mr. Bernard Qubeck and Mr Richard Stri kland, two SWOERCResearch Associates frcrn Miami University, whoe sincere friendship and sharing of educational ideas have provided the author with motivation and new educational insights. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I GENERAL BACKGROUND AND BASIS FOR COMMUNITY SCHOOL COUNCILS Chapter Page in INTRODUCTIONonaogaecioosos se wawa 2 II. RATIONALE FOR THE STUDY.. orimaa ..erso. a* 3 The Prob1em0000000090000000 0009 3 Problem Focus.eommoowe 00000190, Term Definition0....0000000.4 .....0.00 0 .0 0....4 4 .....0 . 6 Objectives00000 004 00000000000000006 00 0 I 9000 0000 00 0 0000 7 Review of Related Literatur3e11000000 9 III. GUIDELINES FOR ORGAUIZATION...... 00 c00 o010 *0040010 15 Repre entative Membership......0.000...... .0... 15 Types of Community School Councils 18 Lines of Authority Clarified...000 0 000 0009 0 00001,00 00 19 Cowtitution and By-Laws00.......................0....0. 19 IV. PARTICIPATION......0 00 00000 0000000 00000000 23 Why Have Community School Councils?olooloolooliseeosecisooses How Can Community School Councils Participate?.acticoosseeetiosiod000. O wooraisesesiol000rmadielow 26 Typical First Year Activities of Community School Councils0 0006100010Of 004100 29 PART II CASE sTuraEs OF BALTIMORE IL AND DAYTON OHIO CASE STUDY NO. 1. BALTIMORE D. iv Chipter Page Background Tifo 33 The Churet-Ge in eration0000000000000000000008017,0 36 SUMMarY00110000000000 000000000000000059100900 39 VI. CASE STUDY NO. 29 DAYTON, OHIO....... 42 BaCkgraando to0 00 0000000000000000000 00000100000 42 Progress of Citizen Participation 0000000000000100099000 46 Achievement 0000.000009000000000000000000000090 OO 00000000 46 Function of Community School Councils.011...... 47 How Will the Project be Conducted... 100000000,00000000110 48 Nomination Procedures000000000 00000000000000900908000009 49 Election Procedures000100.0000000010e100000000000000000 49 Installation of Members.000000e0009000000000000001000000 50 LeadzI'ship Training Program0000000000000001000000000000 50 Surn1iar3r00 0000000000000000000000000000900000090 900000 I 60 BIBLIOGRAPHY...0_0000000000000005000000000500m000000000005001 62 REFRENCES 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 00000 U*0000000000 0 0 0 66 APPENDIXES0v000000000 0 0000000009900 000000000000 0 0000000 69 A. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL RELATING TO CASE STUDY NO. 0 70 Bo EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS FOR CASE SLUDY NO. 2.. 81 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 SAMPLE CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS.0000000000 0000 0 21 2,, PHASES OF COUNCIL TASK DEVELOPMENT.08.00000000000000 27 vi PAW I GENERAL BACKGROUND AND BASIS FOR COMITUNITY SCHOOLcouNans CHAPTER INTRODUCTION This research project on community school councils is under sponsorhsip cf the Southwestern Ohio Educational Research Council (SWOERC ) which is operating in the third year of a federal grant. Trainees under the supervision of SWOERC Directory Dr. Eldon Wiley, may study a topic submitted by one or more of thu thirty-one member schools or select a topic of their own choosing, The latter prerogative was taken in this study of community school councils. Three related research projects developed during the 1968-69 academic year were spawned by needs expressed in the Dayton Model Cities Project.The intent of this tripartite approach is that each will compliment the other and provide rmation beneficial to school systems in search of con- cepts to iprove educational opportunities to the students and c mmunaties they serve. 2 CHAPTER II RAT IONALE FOR THE STUDY The Problem The public school scene in America today is indica- tive of the rapid changes taking place during the post World War II era. Technological development population increase and migration, economic growth, transportation and communica- tion syste s have all mushroomed and public education has been a benefactor of these developments. For instance; 10 Technological development has mechanized the classroom. In order to meet the challenge of operating mec- hanical devices and adaptinE, the curricular materials for presentation teachers tend to specialize. This tendency toward specialization in a particular field has broght about new langugg s, pertinent only to that field, and created a communications gap between the professional and the laymen of the community. 2. The population increase, tr.ggered by the "baby boom" follo.ng World War II, teamed with rising costs of material and human resources has placed financial stress iHaroldHowe, Jr. "Educator, Layman Must Be A Team, American School Board journal, 153:65-67; July, 1966. upon the educa ional system to provide facilities for a growing number of students 30 Transportation has provided the means for a popu- lation to become exceedingly mobile. This provision allows a person to live in the suburbs with its less crowded condi- tions, and yet enjoy the cultural and vocational offerings of the city0 Naking people feel a loyalty to a particular com- municy and involving them meaningfully in the decision Naking process of the public school presents problems to boards of education and educators. 4. The cu rent tendency is toward larger school districts with the intent of providing better servic s more economically to ail the students. Increacd size compounds the problem of communication. A two-way communications syk.;- tem is a must for any school distri t to keep the lay uommunity alei'ed to activities of the school, and in turn, to stay tuned to the wishes of its lay community. Problem Focus Formalorganizationse.g., boards of education, exist within school districts and have statuatory powers a d respon- sibilities. They formulate policies that s rve as guidelines for the total educational program of the schools in their district. Based upon evidence from the lay counminity and p fessional educators they must reque t tax monies to p vide adequate implementation of the educational program. There are also informal types of organizations that exist within s3hool districts such as parent-t acher associa- tions9 athletic booster clubs, music parents, oornrnnity school councils9 etc. This papsr will focus upon the commun- ity school council which is one of the informalorgan zations that functions within a school community. -riffiths views the informal organization ystem of interpersonal relations which forms wtthinan organization to affect deci- sions of the formal organization and this system is omitted from the formal scheme or is in opposition to it."2It is probably fortunate that the majority of informalorganiza- tions operating in the
Recommended publications
  • Download This
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) r~ _ B-1382 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Completelhe National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property I historic name Highfield House____________________________________________ other names B-1382___________________________________________________ 2. Location street & number 4000 North Charles Street ____________________ LJ not for publication city or town Baltimore___________________________________________________ D vicinity state Maryland code MD county Baltimore City code 510 zip code 21218 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ^ nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property E] meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally D statewide ^ locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Kimmel in the C M Nity
    THE SIDNEY KIMMEL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTE R AT JOHNS HOPKINS KIMMEL IN THE C MNITY PILLARS OF PROGRESS Closing the Gap in Cancer Disparities MUCH PROGRESS HAS been made in Maryland toward eliminating cancer disparities, and I am very proud of the role the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center has played in this progress. Overcoming cultural and institutional barriers and increasing minority participation in clinical trials is a priority at the Kimmel Cancer Center. Programs like our Center to Reduce Cancer Disparities, Office of Community Cancer Research, the Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund at Johns Hopkins, and Day at the Market are helping us obtain this goal. Historical Trends (1975-2012) The challenge before Maryland is greater than Mortality, Maryland most states. Thirty percent of Maryland’s citizens are All Cancer Sites, Both Sexes, All Ages Deaths per 100,000 resident population African-American, compared to a national average 350 of 13 percent. We view our state’s demographics as 300 black (includes hispanics) an opportunity to advance the understanding of 250 factors that cause disparities, unravel the science White (includes hispanics) 200 that may also play a contributory role, and become the model for the rest of the country. Our experts are 150 setting the standards for removing barriers and 100 hispanic (any race) improving cancer care for African-Americans and 50 other minorities in Maryland and around the world. 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Although disparities still exist in Maryland, we year of Death continue to close that gap. Overall cancer death rates have declined in our state, and we have narrowed the gap in cancer death disparities between African -American and white Marylanders by more than 60 percent since 2001, far exceeding national progress.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    B-4480 NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking V in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word process, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name One Charles Center other names B-4480 2. Location street & number 100 North Charles Street Q not for publication city or town Baltimore • vicinity state Maryland code MP County Independent city code 510 zip code 21201 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this G3 nomination • request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property C3 meets • does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally • statewide K locally.
    [Show full text]
  • 9780714839622-Mies-Preview.Pdf
    6 Introduction Critical Realism: Life and Form 14 Apprenticeship in Reform 20 Riehl House: Country House Critical Realism 32 Bismarck Memorial: Form and Space 44 Kröller-Müller Villa: Living Geometry Avant-garde: Art and Life 58 Glass Skyscraper: New Beginnings 82 Good Forms for New Types 92 Esters and Lange Houses: New Language 114 Weissenhofsiedlung: Urban Montage Task: Mastering Modernity 138 Barcelona Pavilion: Spiritualizing Technology 168 Tugendhat House: An Elevated Personal Life 182 Neue Wache: In the World and Against It 194 Bauhaus Education 210 Reichsbank: In Dark Times Organic Architecture 232 Resor House: Autonomy 244 AIT/IIT: Open Campus 258 IIT: Clear Construction Unfolding Structure 282 Farnsworth to Crown Hall: Clear Span 314 860–880 Lake Shore Drive: High Rise 338 Seagram Building: Dark Building 364 50 x 50 House to New National Gallery: Variations and Permutations 400 Lafayette Park: City Landscape 444 Event Space: Living Life Large 468 Notes 506 Bibliography 530 Index 007 Ludwig Mies, Riehl House, Potsdam-Neubabelsberg, 1906–7; entrance from the upper walled garden 008 Ludwig Mies at the Riehl house, ca.1912 008 007 In 1906 Bruno Paul recommended Mies to the philosopher Alois Riehl Whereas the neighbouring villas were built as Italian or German Re- became the locus for an alternative way of life. Critical of placing Riehl House: Country and his wife, Sophie, who were looking to build a quiet house for naissance icons set within miniature picturesque gardens, the Riehl houses as features in the centre of their lots and treating the garden summers, weekends and their imminent retirement in the fashionable House was designed by Mies as a simple neo-Biedermeier block as a residual fragment of a picturesque landscape, Muthesius argued Berlin suburb of Potsdam-Neubabelsberg 008.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 GBC Member Directory
    GREATER BALTIMORE COMMITTEE Member Directory Anne Arundel County Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Regional business leaders creating a better tomorrow . today. Greater Baltimore Committee Member Directory Message to Members Awards 3 17 2021 Board of Directors Year in Photos 4 21 GBC at a Glance 11 Year in Review 29 Vision, Mission and 2020 Programs, Regional Perspective 11 Projects and 29 Core Pillars for a Highlights Competitive Business 11 Advocacy Environment 31 Events and 2021 Membership by Communications for 12 Industry Guide 33 Member Engagement 2021 Member Directory 36 Committees 13 Preparing for the Future: 2020 Event Sponsors 7 A Regional Workforce 1 Development Initiative 14 Inside Report Advertisers’ Index Back Cover GBC’s Next Up Program CONTENTS 15 www.gbc.org | 1 INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE UP T.RowePrice Our commitment to positive change is supported through sponsorships, youth programming, volunteerism, and pro bono service. We are an organization focused on transforming communities. troweprice.com/responsibility CCON0061882 202009-1355�17 Message to Members It is an understatement to say that 2020 has been a unique, difficult and • Commit to creating a more representative Board of Directors. challenging year. However, despite the disruptions to normal business • Evaluating and deciding each GBC public policy position through operations brought about by the coronavirus pandemic and other an equity lens. societal challenges, the work of the GBC in its 65th year has remained • Conducting a series of programs to educate and provide needed strong and we expect an even stronger 2021. resources so GBC member and non-member companies can create Like many of you, the GBC has adapted to meet the challenges and has inclusive business environments.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERVIEW with JOSEPH FUJIKAWA Interviewed by Betty J. Blum
    INTERVIEW WITH JOSEPH FUJIKAWA Interviewed by Betty J. Blum Compiled under the auspices of the Chicago Architects Oral History Project The Ernest R. Graham Study Center for Architectural Drawings Department of Architecture The Art Institute of Chicago Copyright © 1995 Revised Edition © 2003 The Art Institute of Chicago This manuscript is hereby made available to the public for research purposes only. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publication, are reserved to the Ryerson and Burnham Libraries of The Art Institute of Chicago. No part of this manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of The Art Institute of Chicago. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface iv Outline of Topics vii Oral History 1 Selected References 31 Curriculum Vitæ 33 Index of Names and Buildings 35 iii PREFACE Since its inception in 1981, the Department of Architecture at The Art Institute of Chicago has engaged in presenting to the public and the profession diverse aspects of the history and process of architecture, with a special concentration on Chicago. The department has produced bold, innovative exhibitions, generated important scholarly publications, and sponsored public programming of major importance, while concurrently increasing its collection of holdings of architectural drawings and documentation. From the beginning, its purpose has been to raise the level of awareness, understanding, and appreciation of the built environment to an ever-widening audience. In the same spirit of breaking new ground, an idea emerged from the department’s advisory committee in 1983 to conduct an oral history project on Chicago architects. Until that time, oral testimony had not been used frequently as a method of documentation in the field of architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • SR Crown Hall Other Name/Site
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-8 OMBNo. 1024-0018 S.R. CROWN HALL Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: S. R. Crown Hall Other Name/Site Number: 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 3360 South State Street Not for publication:_ City/Town: Chicago Vicinity:_ State: IL County: Cook Code: 031 Zip Code: 60616 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): X Public-Local: _ District: _ Public-State: _ Site: _ Public-Federal: Structure: _ Object: _ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 _ buildings _ sites _ structures _ objects 1 0 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 0 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: n/a NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-8 OMBNo. 1024-0018 S.R. CROWN HALL Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • METADATA and PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION Santa Maria Dell'assunzione – Ariccia, ITALY – by Bernini
    TM ARCHIVISION www.archivision.com an image source for visual resource professionals Renseignements généraux en français disponibles sur demande. No part of this publication may be reproduced or printed, in whole or in part, without the written consent of Archivision. All terms and fees subject to change without notice. Archivision Inc. © 2009 Archivision Inc. All rights reserved. version April 2009 THE ARCHIVISION DIGITAL RESEARCH LIBRARY This catalogue is a partially illustrated content list of architectural sites, gardens, parks and works of art which comprise the Archivision Digital Research Library. The Archivision Library is currently 46,000 18 MB files and is composed of: 1) Base Collection (16,000 images) 2) Addition Module One (6,000 images) 3) Addition Module Two (6,000 images) 4) Addition Module Three (6,000 images) 4) Addition Module Four (6,000 images) 4) Addition Module Five (6,000 images) The content coverage within each Library module is: .: 60% architecture (most periods) .: 20% gardens & landscapes .: 15% public art .: 5% other design related topics The Archivision Library makes an ideal complement to any core art digital collection, such as the Saskia Archive or ARTstor. Only the Archivision Digital Research Library meets the needs of students and faculty – for both research and teaching – in the disciplines of architecture, landscape architecture, and urban planning. We do not offer a subscription service – you must sign a site license agreement and pay a one-time license fee for the Library – then you may keep the images and related metadata in perpetuity with no additional annual fees. The exception is where you choose one of our hosted server options – the annual fee you pay is only for the access service.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Mies Van Der Rohe 1 Ludwig Mies Van Der Rohe
    Ludwig Mies van der Rohe 1 Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Born Ludwig MiesMarch 27, 1886Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany Died August 17, 1969 (aged 83)Chicago, Illinois, USA Nationality German 1886-1944/American 1944-1969 Awards Order Pour le Mérite (1959) Royal Gold Medal (1959) AIA Gold Medal (1960) Presidential Medal of Freedom (1963) Work Buildings Barcelona Pavilion Tugendhat House Crown Hall Farnsworth House 860-880 Lake Shore Drive Seagram Building New National Gallery Toronto-Dominion Centre Ludwig Mies van der Rohe (March 27, 1886 – August 17, 1969) was a German architect.[1] He is commonly referred to and addressed by his surname, Mies, by his colleagues, students, writers, and others. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, along with Walter Gropius and Le Corbusier, is widely regarded as one of the pioneering masters of Modern architecture. Mies, like many of his post World War I contemporaries, sought to establish a new architectural style that could represent modern times just as Classical and Gothic did for their own eras. He created an influential 20th century architectural style, stated with extreme clarity and simplicity. His mature buildings made use of modern materials such as industrial steel and plate glass to define interior spaces. He strived towards an architecture with a minimal framework of structural order balanced against the implied freedom of free-flowing open space. He called his buildings "skin and bones" architecture. He sought a rational approach that would guide the creative process of architectural design. He is often associated with the aphorisms "less is more" and "God is in the details".
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Trust
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking “x” in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter “N/A” for “not applicable.” For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Martin Luther King Memorial Library other names 2. Location street & number 9th and G Streets, NW not for publication city or town Washington, D.C. vicinity state District of Columbia code DC county code 001 zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant nationally statewide locally. ( See continuation sheet for additional comments).
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1995, Volume 90, Issue No. 2
    ^ ^ ON ON N 3 to ^ ^ ^ P" s < if) Maryland Historical Magazine Vol. 90, No. 2, Summer 1995 THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded 1844 Dennis A. Fiori, Director The Maryland Historical Magazine Ernest L. Scott Jr., Editor Robert I. Cottom Jr., Associate Editor Patricia Dockman Anderson, Associate Editor Jessica M. Pigza, Managing Editor Jeff Goldman, Photographer Angela Anthony, Robin Donaldson Coblentz, Christopher T.George, Jane Gushing Lange, and Laura S. Rice, Editorial Associates Robert J. Brugger, Consulting Editor Regional Editors John B. Wiseman, Frostburg State University Jane G. Sween, Montgomery Gounty Historical Society Pegram Johnson III, Accoceek, Maryland John R. Wennersten, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Acting as an editorial board, the Publications Committee of the Maryland Historical Society oversees and supports the magazine staff. Members of the committee are: Robert J. Brugger, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Go-Ghair John W. Mitchell, Upper Marlboro; Trustee, Go-Ghair Joseph L. Arnold, University of Maryland, Baltimore Gounty Jean H. Baker, Goucher Gollege James H. Bready, Baltimore Lois Green Garr, St. Mary's Gity Gommission Stiles Tuttle Golwill, Baltimore Richard R. Duncan, Georgetown University Dennis A. Fiori, Maryland Historical Society, ex-officio Jack G. Goellner, The Johns Hopkins University Press Gilbert Gude, Bethesda David Hein, Hood Gollege John Higham, The Johns Hopkins University Ronald Hoffman, Institute of Early American History and Culture Samuel Hopkins, Baltimore Charles McC. Mathias, Chevy Chase Roland G. McConnell, Morgan State University Norvill E. Miller III, Baltimore Edward G Papenfuse, Maryland State Archives The views and conclusions expressed in this magazine are those of the authors. The editors are responsible for the decision to make them public.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Flexiones Del Arquetipo En La Obra De Mies Van Der Rohe. Carlos Lanuza Jarquín
    Las flexiones del arquetipo en la obra de Mies van der Rohe. Carlos Lanuza Jarquín Tesis doctoral dirigida por Antonio Armesto. Departamento de Proyectos Arquitectónicos. Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña. Noviembre 2014. CONCLUSIÓN: EQUILIBRAR LO GENÉRICO Y LO ESPECÍFICO. “Sin embargo, no es dudoso que la fórmula más próxima a la verdad será la que en giro más unitario y armónico valga para mayor número de particularidades –y, como en el telar, un solo golpe anude mil hilos.” José Ortega y Gasset. La deshumanización del arte. “En todas las culturas trata de llegarse a lo especial a partir del caso único. Desde lo especial, que ya no regresará, hasta lo universal que todo lo abarca. El hombre quiere llegar desde esta unicidad siempre nueva, a la que tendría que someterse a largo plazo, hasta la relación con la totalidad, hasta una actitud, que para muchos es correcta en la mayoría de los casos.” Mies van der Rohe. Cuaderno de notas (1927-1928). Página anterior: Las manos de Mies. Fuente: CHS - Disponible en: http://goo.gl/Z3d8wQ 215 Página siguiente: Habiendo analizado los casos de estudio escogidos, estamos en condiciones de 280. Mies trabjando en su oficina en Chica- afirmar que a lo largo de la última etapa profesional de Mies van der Rohe se go. Fuente: MoMA. Mies van de Rohe Archive. advierten ciertas estrategias u operaciones en el proceso de diseño y el desarrollo de un vocabulario particular, que se mantienen constantes a pesar de que difieran la ubicación geográfica y el programa del proyecto. Interesa saber cuáles fueron las operaciones que permitieron desarrollar estos proyectos bajo las condiciones planteadas en cada situación.
    [Show full text]