Physics Department Self-Study and Strategic Plan FY2010 to FY2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Physics Department Self-Study and Strategic Plan FY2010 to FY2017 Physics Department Self-Study and Strategic Plan FY2010 to FY2017 Spring 2010 Physics Department Self-Study and Strategic Plan: FY2010 to FY2017 Table of Contents Questions to be addressed by the Review Team 3 Physics Department Mission Statement 4 1. Introduction and overview of the self-study 4 Summary of the Physics Department’s Strategic Goals for 2010 to 2017 6 2. Research Programs in Physics: Faculty and Staff 7 A. Evolution of the Research Programs in Physics 8 B. Four Persistent Problems 9 1. Space 9 2. Graduate Student Support and Interests 10 3. Return of F&A to Departments and PIs 11 4. Technical Support 11 C. Research Expenditures 12 D. Research Groups, Goals and Strategies 13 1. Astrophysics, Relativity and Cosmology (ARC) 13 2. Condensed Matter Physics 15 3. Optical Physics 17 4. Physics and Astronomy Education Research 21 5. Solar Physics 23 6. Programs and Centers Associated with the Physics Department 25 Spectrum Laboratory Imaging and Chemical analysis Laboratory (ICAL) Space Science and Engineering Lab (SSEL) Montana Space Grant Consortium (MSGC) 7. Emeritus Faculty 27 8. Physics Department Support Staff 27 3. Academic Programs: Undergraduate, Graduate, and Assessment 29 A. Undergraduate Program: B.S. in Physics 29 B. Graduate Programs: M.S. and Ph.D. in Physics 32 C. Concerns needing attention in the graduate program 32 1. Tuition waivers and the 6-credit rule 32 2. Inadequate graduate student stipends 33 3. Excessive time to degree and improved advising strategies 33 D. Enrollments, Degree Completion, and Student Credit Hours Taught 34 1. Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Data Addressing the BOR Criteria 34 2. Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity 35 E. Assessment of Instructional Programs 36 1. Departmental Assessment Plan and Reports 36 2. Student surveys regarding physics courses and career paths 38 1 3. Student, Staff and Faculty Awards, and Faculty Service 39 F. Mentoring Programs for Students and Faculty 40 4. Physics Department Strategic Goals for 2010 to 2017 41 5. Appendices 1. Organization Chart - Physics department: AY2009-2010 48 2. Montana State University Five Year Vision FY09 to FY14 51 3. OSP FY09 Research Expenditures 58 4. OSP Yearly Expenditures 98-07 CLS 60 5. Publications and grants by faculty member for CY 2009 62 6. Curriculum Vitae for all faculty 76 7. Physics Professional Option Flow Chart 163 8. Curricula in Physics by Option 165 9. MSU Catalog: Department of Physics course descriptions 146 10. Selected sections from the Graduate Student Manual 170 11. Key Performance Indicators (KPI) with FY09 Definitions 194 12. Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity: Physics 197 13. MSU Physics Department Assessment Plan: 2009-2011 212 14. MSU Physics Department Assessment Report: Spring 2009 219 15. Selected Results from the Career Destinations Survey 228 16. 2009 Faculty Professional Service (off campus) 234 2 The external review team is being asked to address the following questions provided by the Guidelines for External Program Review, Office of the Provost (JA 10-30-08). 1. What are the strengths of the department? Please list any specific commendations. 2. What are your overall observations of the quality and the rigor of the academic programs? 3. How well does the curriculum represent the field in terms of breadth and currency? Does the curriculum evolve appropriately in response to changes in the field? 4. Please comment on the overall level of faculty productivity as it relates to the stated mission of the department. 5. What is your overall assessment of the quality of graduates produced by the programs in the department? 6. Please identify any weaknesses or unrealized opportunities and provide specific recommendations for action. 7. Please provide specific recommendations regarding any undersubscribed degree programs. In addition, the Department asks that the review team address the following questions specific to the department? 1. Comment on the balance of research and teaching in the department. What are your observations and recommendations regarding faculty staffing for teaching and research, e.g. the relative strengths of our tenure-track, adjunct, and research faculty? 2. Comment on the breadth and balance of research fields in the department, including experiment and theory. What are your observations and recommendations regarding addition of faculty in existing research areas and in areas that are not currently represented by our department? 3. Comment on graduate student support and quality. What are your observations regarding the relative numbers and use of GTAs, GRAs, and fellowships? 4. Any general observations or concerns not addressed by the questions above? 3 Physics Department Self-Study and Strategic Plan: FY2010 to FY2017 Physics Department Mission Statement The Department of Physics is committed to providing the highest quality of physics education to students in the Montana State University campus environment. Meeting this goal requires successful, nationally competitive research programs that contribute to the body of physics knowledge, improve science communication with the public, and forge links between fundamental knowledge and applied technology for the benefit of the people in the state of Montana. 1. Introduction and overview of the self-study As we leave behind the Century of Physics and move boldly forward in the Century of Biology, the discipline of Physics continues to be intellectually vibrant. Exciting discoveries in the fundamental structure of matter and its behavior have deepened our understanding of the natural world, and they have expanded the knowledge base that will generate new technologies in the coming decades. These breakthroughs occur at all length scales from the astrophysical to the human to the microscopic. Increasingly, the boundaries between physics and other disciplines are being blurred, as physicists apply their creativity and analytical skills to address challenging problems in living systems, energy and the environment, communication and transportation, industry, and education. Our students and faculty are actively engaged in these challenging, interdisciplinary problems. Research experience at the frontiers of knowledge advances our main goal, the education of creative and productive scientists for a complex, rapidly changing world. Our commitment to academic excellence is shared by all 30 tenure track, adjunct, and research faculty, our 20 post-doctoral and research scientists, and our 8 professional and technical staff, all of whom maintain a tradition of close contact with our 86 undergraduate majors and 61 graduate students. Our faculty have first-rate equipment, providing a stimulating environment for student research, located in a beautiful and serene mountain environment. An academic program in such an environment provides an enjoyable and rewarding experience for our students. (See Appendix I for the current Organization Chart for the Physics Department AY 2009- 2010.) The vision for Montana State University is to be the university of choice for those seeking a student-centered learning environment distinguished by innovation and discovery in a Rocky Mountain setting (Appendix 2: Campus Profile and Montana State University Five Year Vision FY09 to FY14). The Department of Physics plays a major role in contributing to the University's three-fold mission of instruction, research, and public service. As a provider of instruction in the most fundamental of the natural sciences, the Department serves a variety of student needs: 4 • Students desiring Core natural science credit are introduced to the concepts and methods of physics as well as its historical development and human impacts, while developing their analytical and communication skills. • Students in professional fields such as engineering, architecture, and nursing acquire a basic knowledge of the physical world and problem-solving skills as a preparation for subsequent instruction in the professions • Undergraduate physics majors are furnished with a comprehensive grasp of the concepts, theories, and analytical techniques of physics and are encouraged to develop their creativity by engaging in required capstone research projects under faculty direction while earning the B.S. degree. • Graduate students receive an advanced education in both classical and modern physics, while strengthening their skills in problem solving, communication, creativity, and collaboration through directed research and study leading to the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees. Research programs in the Department of Physics are currently focused in several areas: optical science and laser technology, condensed matter physics, gravitational physics, astrophysics, solar physics, and science education. Our programs in astrophysics and relativity are directed toward a fundamental understanding of the behavior of matter and energy on the astrophysical scale. Research on the physics of lasers and condensed matter systems - such as magnetic and dielectric materials, semiconductor and metal surfaces and thin films, laser materials and superconducting solids - enlarges the knowledge base on which future advances in technology are founded. Research in science education aims to improve the understanding of how students can best learn science in the schools, colleges, and universities. All of the Department's research activities enhance our instructional programs by involving students in capstone research problems and techniques at the frontiers of physical knowledge. Faculty
Recommended publications
  • 2017 Býk Otec Fir 2016 Býk Otec Fir 2015 Býk
    2017 BÝK OTEC FIR 2016 BÝK OTEC FIR 2015 BÝK OTEC FIR 2014 BÝK OTEC FIR 1 2949 LEGACY FRAZZLED 507 2 2944 NASHVILLE DYNASTY 551 BÝCI REGISTROVANÍ V ČR 3 2933 RIVETING FRAZZLED 614 Aktualizace k: 5.1.2019 1 2920 CHARL CHARLEY 551 BÝCI *2017 a starší. TPI 2400 a více 4 2919 PINNACLE 7 MTS 5 2913 AltaLAWSON AltaROBSON 11 Natural, Zooservis 6 2908 DISCJOCKEY FORTUNE 200 Ostatní 7 2908 FULLMARKS FORTUNE 200 8 2908 EISAKU SAMURI 507 9 2907 ACURA ACHIEVER 29 10 2904 BUNDLE ACHIEVER 29 11 2903 DEDICATE SUPERHERO 551 12 2902 PURSUIT IMAX 200 13 2893 EMERALD FORTUNE 200 14 2893 AltaRNR AltaROBSON 11 15 2889 ROME FRAZZLED 614 16 2883 RENEGADE JALTAOAK 550 17 2883 SOLUTION FRAZZLED 614 18 2883 BATMAN IMAX 200 19 2882 ROYAL DUKE 29 20 2882 PONCHO NOBLE 551 21 2879 CHALLENGER SUPERHERO 200 22 2878 PERK SPECTRE 29 23 2878 CRIMSON SPECTRE 29 24 2876 MAESTRO IMAX 200 25 2874 GAMECHANGER MODESTY 1 26 2873 PYRAMID GUARANTEE 200 27 2873 MENACE DELTA-WORTH 551 28 2872 APPLEBEES ACHIEVER 29 29 2872 CASCADE KING ROYAL 507 30 2870 AltaROBERT AltaROBSON 11 31 2869 ARISTOCRAT FRAZZLED 515 32 2869 RAPID RUBI-HAZE 551 33 2867 AltaROADY AltaROBSON 11 34 2866 BIG AL FRAZZLED 507 35 2866 PETRO PROPHECY 29 36 2866 VALUE DUKE 29 37 2865 NACASH SUPERHERO 180 38 2865 EMBELLISH FORTUNE 200 39 2864 BRASS FRAZZLED 507 40 2861 MESCALERO PINNACLE 250 41 2860 KORBEL ACHIEVER 1 42 2860 TIMBERLAKE IMAX 200 43 2860 AltaHOTJOB HOTLINE 11 44 2859 ENFORCE FRAZZLED 100 45 2858 HEMINGWAY FORTUNE 200 46 2857 EXODUS REASON 250 47 2857 ALERT FORTUNE 200 48 2856 DIVERSITY MEDLEY 29 49 2856
    [Show full text]
  • FY08 Technical Papers by GSMTPO Staff
    AURA/NOAO ANNUAL REPORT FY 2008 Submitted to the National Science Foundation July 23, 2008 Revised as Complete and Submitted December 23, 2008 NGC 660, ~13 Mpc from the Earth, is a peculiar, polar ring galaxy that resulted from two galaxies colliding. It consists of a nearly edge-on disk and a strongly warped outer disk. Image Credit: T.A. Rector/University of Alaska, Anchorage NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY NOAO ANNUAL REPORT FY 2008 Submitted to the National Science Foundation December 23, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 1 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS ..................................................................................... 2 1.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory...................................................................................... 2 The Once and Future Supernova η Carinae...................................................................................................... 2 A Stellar Merger and a Missing White Dwarf.................................................................................................. 3 Imaging the COSMOS...................................................................................................................................... 3 The Hubble Constant from a Gravitational Lens.............................................................................................. 4 A New Dwarf Nova in the Period Gap............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    The Boston University Astronomy Department Annual Report 2010 Chair: James Jackson Administrator: Laura Wipf 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 5 Faculty and Staff 5 Teaching 6 Undergraduate Programs 6 Observatory and Facilities 8 Graduate Program 9 Colloquium Series 10 Alumni Affairs/Public Outreach 10 Research 11 Funding 12 Future Plans/Departmental Needs 13 APPENDIX A: Faculty, Staff, and Graduate Students 16 APPENDIX B: 2009/2010 Astronomy Graduates 18 APPENDIX C: Seminar Series 19 APPENDIX D: Sponsored Project Funding 21 APPENDIX E: Accounts Income Expenditures 25 APPENDIX F: Publications 27 Cover photo: An ultraviolet image of Saturn taken by Prof. John Clarke and his group using the Hubble Space Telescope. The oval ribbons toward the top and bottom of the image shows the location of auroral activity near Saturn’s poles. This activity is analogous to Earth’s aurora borealis and aurora australis, the so-called “northern” and “southern lights,” and is caused by energetic particles from the sun trapped in Saturn’s magnetic field. 3 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY associates authored or co-authored a total of 204 refereed, scholarly papers in the disciplines’ most The Department of Astronomy teaches science to prestigious journals. hundreds of non-science majors from throughout the university, and runs one of the largest astronomy degree The funding of the Astronomy Department, the Center programs in the country. Research within the for Space Physics, and the Institute for Astrophysical Astronomy Department is thriving, and we retain our Research was changed this past year. In previous years, strong commitment to teaching and service. only the research centers received research funding, but last year the Department received a portion of this The Department graduated a class of twelve research funding based on grant activity by its faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • HET Publication Report HET Board Meeting 3/4 December 2020 Zoom Land
    HET Publication Report HET Board Meeting 3/4 December 2020 Zoom Land 1 Executive Summary • There are now 420 peer-reviewed HET publications – Fifteen papers published in 2019 – As of 27 November, nineteen published papers in 2020 • HET papers have 29363 citations – Average of 70, median of 39 citations per paper – H-number of 90 – 81 papers have ≥ 100 citations; 175 have ≥ 50 cites • Wide angle surveys account for 26% of papers and 35% of citations. • Synoptic (e.g., planet searches) and Target of Opportunity (e.g., supernovae and γ-ray bursts) programs have produced 47% of the papers and 47% of the citations, respectively. • Listing of the HET papers (with ADS links) is given at http://personal.psu.edu/dps7/hetpapers.html 2 HET Program Classification Code TypeofProgram Examples 1 ToO Supernovae,Gamma-rayBursts 2 Synoptic Exoplanets,EclipsingBinaries 3 OneorTwoObjects HaloofNGC821 4 Narrow-angle HDF,VirgoCluster 5 Wide-angle BlazarSurvey 6 HETTechnical HETQueue 7 HETDEXTheory DarkEnergywithBAO 8 Other HETOptics Programs also broken down into “Dark Time”, “Light Time”, and “Other”. 3 Peer-reviewed Publications • There are now 420 journal papers that either use HET data or (nine cases) use the HET as the motivation for the paper (e.g., technical papers, theoretical studies). • Except for 2005, approximately 22 HET papers were published each year since 2002 through the shutdown. A record 44 papers were published in 2012. • In 2020 a total of fifteen HET papers appeared; nineteen have been published to date in 2020. • Each HET partner has published at least 14 papers using HET data. • Nineteen papers have been published from NOAO time.
    [Show full text]
  • Double and Multiple Star Measurements in the Northern Sky with a 10” Newtonian and a Fast CCD Camera in 2006 Through 2009
    Vol. 6 No. 3 July 1, 2010 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 180 Double and Multiple Star Measurements in the Northern Sky with a 10” Newtonian and a Fast CCD Camera in 2006 through 2009 Rainer Anton Altenholz/Kiel, Germany e-mail: rainer.anton”at”ki.comcity.de Abstract: Using a 10” Newtonian and a fast CCD camera, recordings of double and multiple stars were made at high frame rates with a notebook computer. From superpositions of “lucky images”, measurements of 139 systems were obtained and compared with literature data. B/w and color images of some noteworthy systems are also presented. mented double stars, as will be described in the next Introduction section. Generally, I used a red filter to cope with By using the technique of “lucky imaging”, seeing chromatic aberration of the Barlow lens, as well as to effects can strongly be reduced, and not only the reso- reduce the atmospheric spectrum. For systems with lution of a given telescope can be pushed to its limits, pronounced color contrast, I also made recordings but also the accuracy of position measurements can be with near-IR, green and blue filters in order to pro- better than this by about one order of magnitude. This duce composite images. This setup was the same as I has already been demonstrated in earlier papers in used with telescopes under the southern sky, and as I this journal [1-3]. Standard deviations of separation have described previously [1-3]. Exposure times varied measurements of less than +/- 0.05 msec were rou- between 0.5 msec and 100 msec, depending on the tinely obtained with telescopes of 40 or 50 cm aper- star brightness, and on the seeing.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestone Goto-Bino Series .Cdr
    Kson MilestoneK Standard Alt/Az GOTO Mount INSTRUCTIONS CONTENT FOR KSON STANDARD ALT/AZ GOTO USER INTRODUCTION.................................................................................1 ACCESSORIES..................................................................................2 ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS.............................................................3 FEATURES.........................................................................5 OPERATION MANUAL FOR SKYTOUCH CONTROLLER............... 6 KEY DESCRIPTION.................................................................................6 STATUS DESCRIPTION...........................................................................6 OPERATION PROCESS...........................................................................7 POWER ON......................................................................................7 WARNING........................................................................................7 ALIGNMENT STATUS........................................................................7 CHANGE THE DATE..................................................................7 CHANGE THE TIME...................................................................8 CHANGE THE SITE...................................................................8 ALIGNMENT.............................................................................9 NAVIGATION STATUS.....................................................................11 MENU STATUS................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • 03 MAR 2010.Wps
    IN THIS ISSUE: MARCH 2010 Event Calendar, News Notes Minutes of the February Meeting MVAS Reminders: Chili, Quest, Due MVAS Activities: Guy Talk Observer’s Notes: A Bowl of Galaxies MVAS Homework: Globular M-3 Homework Charts: V Boo, asteroid (2) Pallas Constellation of the Month: Bootes April 2010 Sky Almanac Gallery: Brother Speaks, Barlow Bob’s Corner: Etalon at NEAF Meteorite Editor: Phil Plante 1982 Mathews Rd. #2 Youngstown OH 44514 MARCH 2010 NEWS NOTES Newsletter of the Mahoning Valley Astronomical Society, Inc. Mars in 39 days. The U.S. Space agency is listening closely to Franklin Chang-Diaz, a veteran astronaut (7 missions) and a physicist at MIT. He has developed a rocket propulsion system MVAS CALENDAR called VASIMR (Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket). This system uses electricity to turn a fuel like hydrogen MAR12/13 Messier Marathon at MVCO. Dusk or helium into a jet of plasma 51.8 million F hot. This is then MAR 27 MVAS Business Meeting at YSU. At 8:00 PM. fed/channeled to an exhaust port via magnetic fields. Speeds of up to 35 mi/sec could be obtained. This technology could APR 10 Galaxy Quest at MVCO. 9:00 PM shorten a trip to Mars from seven months to just 39 days. APR 17 Chili Cook-off at MVCO 7:00 PM Current technology would involve a 3 year round trip with a forced 18 month stay on the planet, waiting for a return APR 24 MVAS Business Meeting at MVCO. 8:00 PM opportunity. Scaled-down models of the VASIMR craft have been built and tested in a vacuum, under a deal with NASA.
    [Show full text]
  • Aether and Gravitation, by William George 2 Aether and Gravitation, by William George
    1 Chapter IV. CHAPTER I CHAPTER II CHAPTER III CHAPTER IV CHAPTER V CHAPTER VI CHAPTER VII CHAPTER VIII CHAPTER IX CHAPTER X CHAPTER XI CHAPTER XII CHAPTER XIII CHAPTER XIV CHAPTER I CHAPTER II CHAPTER III CHAPTER IV CHAPTER V CHAPTER VI CHAPTER VII CHAPTER VIII CHAPTER IX CHAPTER X CHAPTER XI CHAPTER XII CHAPTER XIII CHAPTER XIV Chapter X. Aether and Gravitation, by William George 2 Aether and Gravitation, by William George The Project Gutenberg eBook, Aether and Gravitation, by William George Hooper This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Aether and Gravitation Author: William George Hooper Release Date: February 22, 2008 [eBook #24667] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AETHER AND GRAVITATION*** E-text prepared by Barbara Tozier, Ronnie Sahlberg, Bill Tozier, and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this file which includes the original illustrations. See 24667-h.htm or 24667-h.zip: (http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/2/4/6/6/24667/24667-h/24667-h.htm) or (http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/2/4/6/6/24667/24667-h.zip) Transcriber's note: Numbers preceded by a carat character are superscripts (example: 3^2 = 9). Numbers preceded by an tilde are subscripts (example: CO~2) Text enclosed by underscores is italicized.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Astro-Ph/0703453V1 16 Mar 2007
    Very Large Excesses of 18O in Hydrogen-Deficient Carbon and R Coronae Borealis Stars: Evidence for White Dwarf Mergers Geoffrey C. Clayton1, T.R. Geballe2, Falk Herwig3,4, Christopher Fryer4, and Martin Asplund5 ABSTRACT We have found that at least seven hydrogen-deficient carbon (HdC) and R Coronae Borealis (RCB) stars, have 16O/18O ratios close to and in some cases less than unity, values that are orders of magnitude lower than measured in other stars (the Solar value is 500). Greatly enhanced 18O is evident in every HdC and RCB we have measured that is cool enough to have detectable CO bands. The three HdC stars measured have 16O/18O < 1, lower values than any of the RCB stars. These discoveries are important clues in determining the evolutionary pathways of HdC and RCB stars, for which two models have been proposed: the double degenerate (white dwarf (WD) merger), and the final helium-shell flash (FF). No overproduction of 18O is expected in the FF scenario. We have quantitatively explored the idea that HdC and RCB stars originate in the mergers of CO- and He-WDs. The merger process is estimated to take only a few days, −1 with accretion rates of 150M⊙ yr producing temperatures at the base of the accreted envelope of 1.2−1.9×108 K. Analysis of a simplified one-zone calculation shows that nucleosynthesis in the dynamically accreting material may provide a suitable environment for a significant production of 18O, leading to very low values of 16O/18O, similar to those observed. We also find qualitative agreement with 12 13 arXiv:astro-ph/0703453v1 16 Mar 2007 observed values of C/ C and with the CNO elemental ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Name Identity SAO HD FK5 Magnitude Spectral Class Right Ascension Declination Alpheratz Alpha Andromedae 73765 358 1 2,06 B
    Star Name Identity SAO HD FK5 Magnitude Spectral class Right ascension Declination Alpheratz Alpha Andromedae 73765 358 1 2,06 B8IVpMnHg 00h 08,388m 29° 05,433' Caph Beta Cassiopeiae 21133 432 2 2,27 F2III-IV 00h 09,178m 59° 08,983' Algenib Gamma Pegasi 91781 886 7 2,83 B2IV 00h 13,237m 15° 11,017' Ankaa Alpha Phoenicis 215093 2261 12 2,39 K0III 00h 26,283m - 42° 18,367' Schedar Alpha Cassiopeiae 21609 3712 21 2,23 K0IIIa 00h 40,508m 56° 32,233' Deneb Kaitos Beta Ceti 147420 4128 22 2,04 G9.5IIICH-1 00h 43,590m - 17° 59,200' Achird Eta Cassiopeiae 21732 4614 3,44 F9V+dM0 00h 49,100m 57° 48,950' Tsih Gamma Cassiopeiae 11482 5394 32 2,47 B0IVe 00h 56,708m 60° 43,000' Haratan Eta ceti 147632 6805 40 3,45 K1 01h 08,583m - 10° 10,933' Mirach Beta Andromedae 54471 6860 42 2,06 M0+IIIa 01h 09,732m 35° 37,233' Alpherg Eta Piscium 92484 9270 50 3,62 G8III 01h 13,483m 15° 20,750' Rukbah Delta Cassiopeiae 22268 8538 48 2,66 A5III-IV 01h 25,817m 60° 14,117' Achernar Alpha Eridani 232481 10144 54 0,46 B3Vpe 01h 37,715m - 57° 14,200' Baten Kaitos Zeta Ceti 148059 11353 62 3,74 K0IIIBa0.1 01h 51,460m - 10° 20,100' Mothallah Alpha Trianguli 74996 11443 64 3,41 F6IV 01h 53,082m 29° 34,733' Mesarthim Gamma Arietis 92681 11502 3,88 A1pSi 01h 53,530m 19° 17,617' Navi Epsilon Cassiopeiae 12031 11415 63 3,38 B3III 01h 54,395m 63° 40,200' Sheratan Beta Arietis 75012 11636 66 2,64 A5V 01h 54,640m 20° 48,483' Risha Alpha Piscium 110291 12447 3,79 A0pSiSr 02h 02,047m 02° 45,817' Almach Gamma Andromedae 37734 12533 73 2,26 K3-IIb 02h 03,900m 42° 19,783' Hamal Alpha
    [Show full text]
  • Globular Clusters, Though
    Appendix: What You’re Looking At Early astronomers divided astronomical objects into three main types: planets, stars, and what were called mists or clouds; in Latin, nebulae. Stars had fixed positions relative to one another, but the planets moved about, and so the ancient Greeks called them wanderers, plan¯et¯es. The changing positions of the planets were hard to explain, and none of the Solar System models proposed bytheancientGreeksorRomansadequatelyexplainedthingssuchasretrograde motion. But even though they didn’t understand why the planets moved about, the Greeks and Romans both placed huge value on interpreting the movements of the planets. This is the art of astrology, a practice that has developed independently in many different cultures around the world. That stars were in some way similar to the Sun was something the ancient Greeks had guessed at, but it wasn’t until the nineteenth century and the invention of spec- troscopy that scientists could demonstrate that the light produced by the Sun was the similar to that produced by the stars. Over time different types of stars were identi- fied, and it soon became clear that the Sun was a relatively small and ordinary star by cosmic standards, even though it is vitally important to us. Nebulae posed particular problems for astronomers prior to the invention of the telescope. To the naked eye all nebulae look alike, nothing more than faint, misty patches of light. Only with the telescope was the diversity of nebulae revealed, but while they could be seen to be morphologically different, astronomers of the early modern era didn’t understand that a planetary nebula is a very different thing to something like the Great Nebula in Andromeda, what we’d today recognize as a galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy05 Accomplishments and Fy06 Plans Helmut A. Abt
    Appendix A NOAO SCIENTIFIC STAFF: FY05 ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND FY06 PLANS ¬New appointment in FY05 S Non-NSF (external) funding ±Term ended in FY05 HELMUT A. ABT, Emeritus Astronomer Research Interests Evolutionary stellar problems, stellar characteristics, publication studies FY05 Accomplishments Abt and C. Boonyarak (U. Thailand) studied rotation velocities of stars in binaries. It was known that those with periods shorter than several days all have synchronized rotational and orbital motions. They found that binaries with periods up to 500 days have reduced rotational velocities due to tidal interactions. Abt found that the eccentricities in binaries vary from zero in close binaries to an average of 0.5 in binaries with periods greater than 1000 days. In the initial formation of binaries, all eccentricities are equally probable. FY06 Plans Abt is trying to understand the hot inner disks that occur around, at any one time, one-quarter of the rapidly- rotating A dwarfs. These disks have no connection with the outer cool dust disks found around many stars like Vega and beta Pictoris. These disks come and go on time scales of decades. Such stars do not occur in the low-density Local Interstellar Bubble, so they are material accreted from the interstellar medium. Theoretical aspects of the physical processes is being done with M. Marlborough (U. Western Ontario). TAFT E. ARMANDROFF, Astronomer (Director, NOAO Gemini Science Center) Research Interests Stellar populations in the Galaxy and nearby galaxies; dwarf spheroidal galaxies; globular clusters FY05 Accomplishments Armandroff has been studying the dwarf spheroidal satellite galaxies of M31 in collaboration with Da Costa (RSAA/ANU), Pritzl (Macalester), and Jacoby (WIYN).
    [Show full text]