DOCSLIB.ORG

FY08 Technical Papers by GSMTPO Staff

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY08 Technical Papers by GSMTPO Staff AURA/NOAO ANNUAL REPORT FY 2008 Submitted to the National Science Foundation July 23, 2008 Revised as Complete and Submitted December 23, 2008 NGC 660, ~13 Mpc from the Earth, is a peculiar, polar ring galaxy that resulted from two galaxies colliding. It consists of a nearly edge-on disk and a strongly warped outer disk. Image Credit: T.A. Rector/University of Alaska, Anchorage NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY NOAO ANNUAL REPORT FY 2008 Submitted to the National Science Foundation December 23, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 1 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS ..................................................................................... 2 1.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory...................................................................................... 2 The Once and Future Supernova η Carinae...................................................................................................... 2 A Stellar Merger and a Missing White Dwarf.................................................................................................. 3 Imaging the COSMOS...................................................................................................................................... 3 The Hubble Constant from a Gravitational Lens.............................................................................................. 4 A New Dwarf Nova in the Period Gap............................................................................................................. 4 The Sooty Star RV Coronae Borealis............................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Kitt Peak National Observatory....................................................................................................... 4 Broad Scientific and Educational Impact Continues........................................................................................ 4 New Accretion Disk Paradigm from a Model Diverse Scientific Partnership ................................................ 5 The Better Known Dark Matter ........................................................................................................................ 5 Multiwavelength Science Enabled by KPNO Observations............................................................................ 6 Small Telescope Helps Discover Future Binary Black Hole System .............................................................. 6 Completed NOAO Survey Programs Produce New Discoveries.................................................................... 6 KPNO’s Role in Graduate Education and Developing Instrumentalists ......................................................... 6 1.3 NOAO Gemini Science Center ....................................................................................................... 7 GNIRS Observations of a Blast Wave from the 1843 Eruption of η Carinae................................................. 7 The Gemini Deep Planet Survey....................................................................................................................... 7 2 GROUND-BASED O/IR OBSERVING SYSTEM............................................................................. 10 2.1 Strategy and Goals ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.2 CTIO Telescopes........................................................................................................................... 10 Blanco 4-m Telescope..................................................................................................................................... 11 Southern Astrophysical Research (SOAR) Telescope ................................................................................... 12 SMARTS Consortium Operation of the CTIO Small Telescopes................................................................. 13 Tenant Observatories....................................................................................................................................... 13 Infrastructure and Support............................................................................................................................... 13 Site Protection.................................................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 KPNO Telescopes ......................................................................................................................... 14 The National Observatory Celebrates 50 Years ............................................................................................. 15 Mayall 4-m Telescope..................................................................................................................................... 15 WIYN 3.5-m Telescope .................................................................................................................................. 16 2.1-m Telescope .............................................................................................................................................. 17 Tenant Observatories....................................................................................................................................... 18 Relations with the Tohono O’odham Nation.................................................................................................. 19 Operations and Instrumentation Partnerships................................................................................................. 19 General Site Infrastructure Improvements...................................................................................................... 19 Site Protection.................................................................................................................................................. 19 2.4 The Gemini Observatory............................................................................................................... 20 Support of U.S. Gemini Users and Proposers................................................................................................. 20 Providing U.S. Scientific and Operational Input to Gemini........................................................................... 21 U.S. Gemini Instrumentation Program ........................................................................................................... 22 i NOAO ANNUAL REPORT FY 2008 2.5 System Development .....................................................................................................................22 ReSTAR .......................................................................................................................................................... 23 ALTAIR .......................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.6 System Implementation ..................................................................................................................26 Telescope System Instrumentation Program.................................................................................................. 26 Telescope Time Allocation............................................................................................................................. 26 2.7 System Instrumentation ..................................................................................................................27 NOAO Extremely Wide-Field IR Imager ...................................................................................................... 27 SOAR Adaptive Optics Module..................................................................................................................... 28 MONSOON Detector Controller.................................................................................................................... 29 ReSTAR Implementation ............................................................................................................................... 30 2.8 NOAO Data Products Program......................................................................................................30 Data Management System .............................................................................................................................. 30 Science Support Software ............................................................................................................................... 32 National Virtual Observatory.......................................................................................................................... 33 2.9 Large-Aperture Synoptic Survey Telescope ..................................................................................34 Telescope and Site........................................................................................................................................... 34 Science and Science Collaboration................................................................................................................. 35 2.10 Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope ...............................................................................................35 Staffing ...........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1601.00329V3 [Astro-Ph.CO] 19 Aug 2016 Early Data
    DES 2015-0085 FERMILAB-PUB-16-003-AE Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–?? (2002) Printed 22 August 2016 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview Dark Energy Survey Collaboration: T. Abbott1, F. B. Abdalla2, J. Aleksic´47, S. Allam3, A. Amara4, D. Bacon6, E. Balbinot46, M. Banerji7;8, K. Bechtol56;57, A. Benoit-Levy´ 13;2;12, G. M. Bernstein10, E. Bertin12;13, J. Blazek14, C. Bonnett15, S. Bridle16, D. Brooks2, R. J. Brunner41;20, E. Buckley- Geer3, D. L. Burke11;17, G. B. Caminha51;52, D. Capozzi6, J. Carlsen6, A. Carnero-Rosell18;19, M. Carollo54, M. Carrasco-Kind20;21, J. Carretero9;47, F. J. Castander9, L. Clerkin2, T. Collett6, C. Conselice55, M. Crocce9, C. E. Cunha11, C. B. D’Andrea6, L. N. da Costa19;18, T. M. Davis49, S. Desai25;24, H. T. Diehl3, J. P. Dietrich25;24, S. Dodelson3;27;58, P. Doel2, A. Drlica-Wagner3, J. Estrada3, J. Etherington6, A. E. Evrard22;29, J. Fabbri2, D. A. Finley3, B. Flaugher3, R. J. Foley21;41, P. Fosalba9, J. Frieman27;3, J. Garc´ıa-Bellido43, E. Gaztanaga9, D. W. Gerdes22, T. Giannantonio8;7, D. A. Goldstein44;37, D. Gruen17;11, R. A. Gruendl20;21, P. Guarnieri6, G. Gutierrez3, W. Hartley4, K. Honscheid14;32, B. Jain10, D. J. James1, T. Jeltema53, S. Jouvel2, R. Kessler27;58, A. King49, D. Kirk2, R. Kron27, K. Kuehn33, N. Kuropatkin3, O. Lahav2;?, T. S. Li23, M. Lima19;35, H. Lin3, M. A. G. Maia19;18, M. Makler51, M. Manera2, C. Maraston6, J. L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Býk Otec Fir 2016 Býk Otec Fir 2015 Býk
    2017 BÝK OTEC FIR 2016 BÝK OTEC FIR 2015 BÝK OTEC FIR 2014 BÝK OTEC FIR 1 2949 LEGACY FRAZZLED 507 2 2944 NASHVILLE DYNASTY 551 BÝCI REGISTROVANÍ V ČR 3 2933 RIVETING FRAZZLED 614 Aktualizace k: 5.1.2019 1 2920 CHARL CHARLEY 551 BÝCI *2017 a starší. TPI 2400 a více 4 2919 PINNACLE 7 MTS 5 2913 AltaLAWSON AltaROBSON 11 Natural, Zooservis 6 2908 DISCJOCKEY FORTUNE 200 Ostatní 7 2908 FULLMARKS FORTUNE 200 8 2908 EISAKU SAMURI 507 9 2907 ACURA ACHIEVER 29 10 2904 BUNDLE ACHIEVER 29 11 2903 DEDICATE SUPERHERO 551 12 2902 PURSUIT IMAX 200 13 2893 EMERALD FORTUNE 200 14 2893 AltaRNR AltaROBSON 11 15 2889 ROME FRAZZLED 614 16 2883 RENEGADE JALTAOAK 550 17 2883 SOLUTION FRAZZLED 614 18 2883 BATMAN IMAX 200 19 2882 ROYAL DUKE 29 20 2882 PONCHO NOBLE 551 21 2879 CHALLENGER SUPERHERO 200 22 2878 PERK SPECTRE 29 23 2878 CRIMSON SPECTRE 29 24 2876 MAESTRO IMAX 200 25 2874 GAMECHANGER MODESTY 1 26 2873 PYRAMID GUARANTEE 200 27 2873 MENACE DELTA-WORTH 551 28 2872 APPLEBEES ACHIEVER 29 29 2872 CASCADE KING ROYAL 507 30 2870 AltaROBERT AltaROBSON 11 31 2869 ARISTOCRAT FRAZZLED 515 32 2869 RAPID RUBI-HAZE 551 33 2867 AltaROADY AltaROBSON 11 34 2866 BIG AL FRAZZLED 507 35 2866 PETRO PROPHECY 29 36 2866 VALUE DUKE 29 37 2865 NACASH SUPERHERO 180 38 2865 EMBELLISH FORTUNE 200 39 2864 BRASS FRAZZLED 507 40 2861 MESCALERO PINNACLE 250 41 2860 KORBEL ACHIEVER 1 42 2860 TIMBERLAKE IMAX 200 43 2860 AltaHOTJOB HOTLINE 11 44 2859 ENFORCE FRAZZLED 100 45 2858 HEMINGWAY FORTUNE 200 46 2857 EXODUS REASON 250 47 2857 ALERT FORTUNE 200 48 2856 DIVERSITY MEDLEY 29 49 2856
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae - 24 March 2020
    Dr. Eric E. Mamajek Curriculum Vitae - 24 March 2020 Jet Propulsion Laboratory Phone: (818) 354-2153 4800 Oak Grove Drive FAX: (818) 393-4950 MS 321-162 [email protected] Pasadena, CA 91109-8099 https://science.jpl.nasa.gov/people/Mamajek/ Positions 2020- Discipline Program Manager - Exoplanets, Astro. & Physics Directorate, JPL/Caltech 2016- Deputy Program Chief Scientist, NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program, JPL/Caltech 2017- Professor of Physics & Astronomy (Research), University of Rochester 2016-2017 Visiting Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2016 Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2013-2016 Associate Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2011-2012 Associate Astronomer, NOAO, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory 2008-2013 Assistant Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester (on leave 2011-2012) 2004-2008 Clay Postdoctoral Fellow, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 2000-2004 Graduate Research Assistant, University of Arizona, Astronomy 1999-2000 Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Arizona, Astronomy 1998-1999 J. William Fulbright Fellow, Australia, ADFA/UNSW School of Physics Languages English (native), Spanish (advanced) Education 2004 Ph.D. The University of Arizona, Astronomy 2001 M.S. The University of Arizona, Astronomy 2000 M.Sc. The University of New South Wales, ADFA, Physics 1998 B.S. The Pennsylvania State University, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Physics 1993 H.S. Bethel Park High School Research Interests Formation and Evolution
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Astro2010 Recommendations on Variable Star Science
    The Impact of the Astro2010 Recommendations on Variable Star Science Corresponding Authors Lucianne M. Walkowicz Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley [email protected] phone: (510) 642–6931 Andrew C. Becker Department of Astronomy, University of Washington [email protected] phone: (206) 685–0542 Authors Scott F. Anderson, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Joshua S. Bloom, Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley Leonid Georgiev, Universidad Autonoma de Mexico Josh Grindlay, Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Steve Howell, National Optical Astronomy Observatory Knox Long, Space Telescope Science Institute Anjum Mukadam, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Andrej Prsa,ˇ Villanova University Joshua Pepper, Villanova University Arne Rau, California Institute of Technology Branimir Sesar, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Nicole Silvestri, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Nathan Smith, Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley Keivan Stassun, Vanderbilt University Paula Szkody, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Science Frontier Panels: Stars and Stellar Evolution (SSE) February 16, 2009 Abstract The next decade of survey astronomy has the potential to transform our knowledge of variable stars. Stellar variability underpins our knowledge of the cosmological distance ladder, and provides direct tests of stellar formation and evolution theory. Variable stars can also be used to probe the fundamental physics of gravity and degenerate material in ways that are otherwise impossible in the laboratory. The computational and engineering advances of the past decade have made large–scale, time–domain surveys an immediate reality. Some surveys proposed for the next decade promise to gather more data than in the prior cumulative history of astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • An October 2003 Amateur Observation of HD 209458B
    Tsunami 3-2004 A Shadow over Oxie Anders Nyholm A shadow over Oxie – An October 2003 amateur observation of HD 209458b Anders Nyholm Rymdgymnasiet Kiruna, Sweden April 2004 Tsunami 3-2004 A Shadow over Oxie Anders Nyholm Abstract This paper describes a photometry observation by an amateur astronomer of a transit of the extrasolar planet HD 209458b across its star on the 26th of October 2003. A description of the telescope, CCD imager, software and method used is provided. The preparations leading to the transit observation are described, along with a chronology. The results of the observation (in the form of a time-magnitude diagram) is reproduced, investigated and discussed. It is concluded that the HD 209458b transit most probably was observed. A number of less successful attempts at observing HD 209458b transits in August and October 2003 are also described. A general introduction describes the development in astronomy leading to observations of extrasolar planets in general and amateur observations of extrasolar planets in particular. Tsunami 3-2004 A Shadow over Oxie Anders Nyholm Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Background 3 2.1 Transit pre-history: Mercury and Venus 3 2.2 Extrasolar planets: a brief history 4 2.3 Early photometry proposals 6 2.4 HD 209458b: discovery and study 6 2.5 Stellar characteristics of HD 209458 6 2.6 Characteristics of HD 209458b 7 3. Observations 7 3.1 Observatory, equipment and software 7 3.2 Test observation of SAO 42275 on the 14th of April 2003 7 3.3 Selection of candidate transits 7 3.4 Test observation and transit observation attempts in August 2003 8 3.5 Transit observation attempt on the 12th of October 2003 8 3.6 Transit observation attempt on the 26th of October 2003 8 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectroscopic Study of the Open Cluster Blanco 1
    A&A 507, 541–547 (2009) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912772 & c ESO 2009 Astrophysics Spectroscopic study of the open cluster Blanco 1 J. F. González and H. Levato Instituto de Ciencias Astronómicas, de la Tierra y del Espacio, Casilla 467, 5400 San Juan, Argentina e-mail: [email protected] Received 26 June 2009 / Accepted 17 August 2009 ABSTRACT Aims. As a part of our program on binaries in open clusters, we present a spectroscopic study of the bright stars of Blanco 1 aimed at detecting and characterizing spectroscopic binaries. Methods. Forty five stars previously mentioned as cluster candidates, plus another 24 stars in a wider region around the cluster were observed repeatedly during 6 years, with a spectral resolving power 13 300. Radial velocities were measured by cross-correlations. Results. We obtained a mean cluster velocity of 6.2 ± 0.3 km s−1 and determined kinematic membership. Eleven spectroscopic binaries were detected, and orbital solutions are presented for eight of them. Six binaries are confirmed to be members of the cluster. All of them are single-lined spectroscopic systems with periods in the range 1.9−1380 days. Considering all suspected binaries, the cluster binary frequency amounts to about 50%. Key words. open clusters and associations: individual: Blanco 1 – binaries: spectroscopic – techniques: radial velocities 1. Introduction [Fe/H] =+0.24 for the cluster, with an unusual chemical abun- dance pattern. More recently, Ford et al. (2005) found a metallic- While counting stars of spectral type A0 in Kapteyn’s selected ity close to solar: [Fe/H] =+0.04 ± 0.04.
    [Show full text]
  • Stats2010 E Final.Pdf
    Imprint Publisher: Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik Editors and Layout: W. Collmar und J. Zanker-Smith Personnel 1 PERSONNEL 2010 Directors Min. Dir. J. Meyer, Section Head, Federal Ministry of Prof. Dr. R. Bender, Optical and Interpretative Astronomy, Economics and Technology also Professorship for Astronomy/Astrophysics at the Prof. Dr. E. Rohkamm, Thyssen Krupp AG, Düsseldorf Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich Prof. Dr. R. Genzel, Infrared- and Submillimeter- Scientifi c Advisory Board Astronomy, also Prof. of Physics, University of California, Prof. Dr. R. Davies, Oxford University (UK) Berkeley (USA) (Managing Director) Prof. Dr. R. Ellis, CALTECH (USA) Prof. Dr. Kirpal Nandra, High-Energy Astrophysics Dr. N. Gehrels, NASA/GSFC (USA) Prof. Dr. G. Morfi ll, Theory, Non-linear Dynamics, Complex Prof. Dr. F. Harrison, CALTECH (USA) Plasmas Prof. Dr. O. Havnes, University of Tromsø (Norway) Prof. Dr. G. Haerendel (emeritus) Prof. Dr. P. Léna, Université Paris VII (France) Prof. Dr. R. Lüst (emeritus) Prof. Dr. R. McCray, University of Colorado (USA), Prof. Dr. K. Pinkau (emeritus) Chair of Board Prof. Dr. J. Trümper (emeritus) Prof. Dr. M. Salvati, Osservatorio Astrofi sico di Arcetri (Italy) Junior Research Groups and Minerva Fellows Dr. N.M. Förster Schreiber Humboldt Awardee Dr. S. Khochfar Prof. Dr. P. Henry, University of Hawaii (USA) Prof. Dr. H. Netzer, Tel Aviv University (Israel) MPG Fellow Prof. Dr. V. Tsytovich, Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof. Dr. A. Burkert (LMU) Moscow (Russia) Manager’s Assistant Prof. S. Veilleux, University of Maryland (USA) Dr. H. Scheingraber A. v. Humboldt Fellows Scientifi c Secretary Prof. Dr. D. Jaffe, University of Texas (USA) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronal Activity Cycles in 61 Cygni
    A&A 460, 261–267 (2006) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065459 & c ESO 2006 Astrophysics Coronal activity cycles in 61 Cygni A. Hempelmann1, J. Robrade1,J.H.M.M.Schmitt1,F.Favata2,S.L.Baliunas3, and J. C. Hall4 1 Universität Hamburg, Hamburger Sternwarte, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astrophysics Division – Research and Science Support Department of ESA, ESTEC, Postbus 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands 3 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, USA 4 Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA Received 19 April 2006 / Accepted 25 July 2006 ABSTRACT Context. While the existence of stellar analogues of the 11 years solar activity cycle is proven for dozens of stars from optical observations of chromospheric activity, the observation of clearly cyclical coronal activity is still in its infancy. Aims. In this paper, long-term X-ray monitoring of the binary 61 Cygni is used to investigate possible coronal activity cycles in moderately active stars. Methods. We are monitoring both stellar components, a K5V (A) and a K7V (B) star, of 61 Cyg with XMM-Newton. The first four years of these observations are combined with ROSAT HRI observations of an earlier monitoring campaign. The X-ray light curves are compared with the long-term monitoring of chromospheric activity, as measured by the Mt.Wilson CaII H+K S -index. Results. Besides the observation of variability on short time scales, long-term variations of the X-ray activity are clearly present. For 61 Cyg A we find a coronal cycle which clearly reflects the well-known and distinct chromospheric activity cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • A Blast Wave from the 1843 Eruption of Eta Carinae
    1 A Blast Wave from the 1843 Eruption of Eta Carinae Nathan Smith* *Astronomy Department, University of California, 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411 Very massive stars shed much of their mass in violent precursor eruptions [1] as luminous blue variables (LBVs) [2] before reaching their most likely end as supernovae, but the cause of LBV eruptions is unknown. The 19th century eruption of Eta Carinae, the prototype of these events [3], ejected about 12 solar masses at speeds of 650 km/s, with a kinetic energy of almost 1050ergs[4]. Some faster material with speeds up to 1000-2000 km/s had previously been reported [5,6,7,8] but its full distribution was unknown. Here I report observations of much faster material with speeds up to 3500-6000 km/s, reaching farther from the star than the fastest material in earlier reports [5]. This fast material roughly doubles the kinetic energy of the 19th century event, and suggests that it released a blast wave now propagating ahead of the massive ejecta. Thus, Eta Carinae’s outer shell now mimics a low-energy supernova remnant. The eruption has usually been discussed in terms of an extreme wind driven by the star’s luminosity [2,3,9,10], but fast material reported here suggests that it was powered by a deep-seated explosion rivalling a supernova, perhaps triggered by the pulsational pair instability[11]. This may alter interpretations of similar events seen in other galaxies. Eta Carinae [3] is the most luminous and the best studied among LBVs [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • The Twofold Debris Disk Around HD 113766 A⋆
    A&A 551, A134 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220904 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics The twofold debris disk around HD 113766 A? Warm and cold dust as seen with VLTI/MIDI and Herschel/PACS J. Olofsson1, Th. Henning1, M. Nielbock1, J.-C. Augereau2, A. Juhàsz3, I. Oliveira4, O. Absil5, and A. Tamanai6 1 Max Planck Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 UJF-Grenoble 1/CNRS-INSU, Institut de Planétologie et d’Astrophysique de Grenoble (IPAG), UMR 5274, Grenoble, France 3 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 4 Astronomy Department, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C1400, Austin, TX 78712-0259, USA 5 Département d’Astrophysique, Géophysique et Océanographie, Université de Liège, 17 Allée du Six Août, 4000 Sart Tilman, Belgium 6 University Heidelberg, Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany Received 13 December 2012 / Accepted 22 January 2013 ABSTRACT Context. Warm debris disks are a sub-sample of the large population of debris disks, and display excess emission in the mid-infrared. Around solar-type stars, very few objects (∼2% of all debris disks) show emission features in mid-IR spectroscopic observations that are attributed to small, warm silicate dust grains. The origin of this warm dust could be explained either by a recent catastrophic collision between several bodies or by transport from an outer belt similar to the Kuiper belt in the solar system. Aims. We present and analyze new far-IR Herschel/PACS photometric observations, supplemented by new and archival ground-based data in the mid-IR (VLTI/MIDI and VLT/VISIR), for one of these rare systems: the 10–16 Myr old debris disk around HD 113766 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Binocular Double Star Logbook
    Astronomical League Binocular Double Star Club Logbook 1 Table of Contents Alpha Cassiopeiae 3 14 Canis Minoris Sh 251 (Oph) Psi 1 Piscium* F Hydrae Psi 1 & 2 Draconis* 37 Ceti Iota Cancri* 10 Σ2273 (Dra) Phi Cassiopeiae 27 Hydrae 40 & 41 Draconis* 93 (Rho) & 94 Piscium Tau 1 Hydrae 67 Ophiuchi 17 Chi Ceti 35 & 36 (Zeta) Leonis 39 Draconis 56 Andromedae 4 42 Leonis Minoris Epsilon 1 & 2 Lyrae* (U) 14 Arietis Σ1474 (Hya) Zeta 1 & 2 Lyrae* 59 Andromedae Alpha Ursae Majoris 11 Beta Lyrae* 15 Trianguli Delta Leonis Delta 1 & 2 Lyrae 33 Arietis 83 Leonis Theta Serpentis* 18 19 Tauri Tau Leonis 15 Aquilae 21 & 22 Tauri 5 93 Leonis OΣΣ178 (Aql) Eta Tauri 65 Ursae Majoris 28 Aquilae Phi Tauri 67 Ursae Majoris 12 6 (Alpha) & 8 Vul 62 Tauri 12 Comae Berenices Beta Cygni* Kappa 1 & 2 Tauri 17 Comae Berenices Epsilon Sagittae 19 Theta 1 & 2 Tauri 5 (Kappa) & 6 Draconis 54 Sagittarii 57 Persei 6 32 Camelopardalis* 16 Cygni 88 Tauri Σ1740 (Vir) 57 Aquilae Sigma 1 & 2 Tauri 79 (Zeta) & 80 Ursae Maj* 13 15 Sagittae Tau Tauri 70 Virginis Theta Sagittae 62 Eridani Iota Bootis* O1 (30 & 31) Cyg* 20 Beta Camelopardalis Σ1850 (Boo) 29 Cygni 11 & 12 Camelopardalis 7 Alpha Librae* Alpha 1 & 2 Capricorni* Delta Orionis* Delta Bootis* Beta 1 & 2 Capricorni* 42 & 45 Orionis Mu 1 & 2 Bootis* 14 75 Draconis Theta 2 Orionis* Omega 1 & 2 Scorpii Rho Capricorni Gamma Leporis* Kappa Herculis Omicron Capricorni 21 35 Camelopardalis ?? Nu Scorpii S 752 (Delphinus) 5 Lyncis 8 Nu 1 & 2 Coronae Borealis 48 Cygni Nu Geminorum Rho Ophiuchi 61 Cygni* 20 Geminorum 16 & 17 Draconis* 15 5 (Gamma) & 6 Equulei Zeta Geminorum 36 & 37 Herculis 79 Cygni h 3945 (CMa) Mu 1 & 2 Scorpii Mu Cygni 22 19 Lyncis* Zeta 1 & 2 Scorpii Epsilon Pegasi* Eta Canis Majoris 9 Σ133 (Her) Pi 1 & 2 Pegasi Δ 47 (CMa) 36 Ophiuchi* 33 Pegasi 64 & 65 Geminorum Nu 1 & 2 Draconis* 16 35 Pegasi Knt 4 (Pup) 53 Ophiuchi Delta Cephei* (U) The 28 stars with asterisks are also required for the regular AL Double Star Club.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Another Earth-Like Planet and Life Elsewhere Joshua Krissansen-Totton and David C
    2 The Search for Another Earth-Like Planet and Life Elsewhere joshua krissansen-totton and david c. catling Introduction Is there life beyond Earth? Unlike most of the great cosmic questions pondered by anyone who has spent an evening of wonder beneath starry skies, this one seems accessible, perhaps even answerable. Other equally profound questions such as “Why does the universe exist?” and “How did life begin?” are perhaps more diffi- cult to address and must have complex explanations. But when one asks, “Is there life beyond Earth?” the answer is “Yes” or “No”. Yet despite the apparent simplic- ity, either conclusion would have profound implications. Few scientific discoveries have the power to reshape our sense of place inthe cosmos. The Copernican Revolution, the first such discovery, marked the birth of modern science. Suddenly, the Earth was no longer the center of the universe. This revelation heralded a series of findings that further diminished our perceived self- importance: the cosmic distance scale (Bessel, 1838), the true size of our galaxy (Shapley, 1918), the existence of other galaxies (Hubble, 1925), and finally, the large-scale structure and evolution of the cosmos. As Carl Sagan put it, “The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena” (Sagan, 1994, p. 6). Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection was the next perspective- shifting discovery. By providing a scientific explanation for the complexity and diversity of life, the theory of evolution replaced the almost universal belief that each organism was designed by a creator. Every species, including our own, was a small twig in an immense and slowly changing tree of life, driven by variation and natural selection.
    [Show full text]