Globular Clusters, Though

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Globular Clusters, Though Appendix: What You’re Looking At Early astronomers divided astronomical objects into three main types: planets, stars, and what were called mists or clouds; in Latin, nebulae. Stars had fixed positions relative to one another, but the planets moved about, and so the ancient Greeks called them wanderers, plan¯et¯es. The changing positions of the planets were hard to explain, and none of the Solar System models proposed bytheancientGreeksorRomansadequatelyexplainedthingssuchasretrograde motion. But even though they didn’t understand why the planets moved about, the Greeks and Romans both placed huge value on interpreting the movements of the planets. This is the art of astrology, a practice that has developed independently in many different cultures around the world. That stars were in some way similar to the Sun was something the ancient Greeks had guessed at, but it wasn’t until the nineteenth century and the invention of spec- troscopy that scientists could demonstrate that the light produced by the Sun was the similar to that produced by the stars. Over time different types of stars were identi- fied, and it soon became clear that the Sun was a relatively small and ordinary star by cosmic standards, even though it is vitally important to us. Nebulae posed particular problems for astronomers prior to the invention of the telescope. To the naked eye all nebulae look alike, nothing more than faint, misty patches of light. Only with the telescope was the diversity of nebulae revealed, but while they could be seen to be morphologically different, astronomers of the early modern era didn’t understand that a planetary nebula is a very different thing to something like the Great Nebula in Andromeda, what we’d today recognize as a galaxy. Indeed, some astronomers viewed nebulae more as nuisances than as objects worthy of investigation. The deep sky objects Charles Messier added to his famous catalog were only of interest to him because they might be mistaken for comets, objects of far greater importance at the time. N. Monks, Go-To Telescopes Under Suburban Skies, Patrick Moore’s Practical 225 Astronomy Series, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6851-7, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 226 Go-To Telescopes Under Suburban Skies Eventually the differences between nebulae were understood, and galaxies in par- ticular caused a profound rethink about the size of the universe. Once it became clear that these ‘spiral nebulae’ were galaxies like our own Milky Way Galaxy, astronomers had to accept that the universe was a much bigger place than they had previously thought. Just as the Sun turned out to be a very ordinary star, so the Milky Way was revealed as just one galaxy among millions. Exploring the night sky with a go-to telescope lets you condense thousands of years’ worth of scientific progress into an hour or two. As the preceding chapters have hopefully revealed, even objects that appear quite unexciting visually become much more interesting once you understand why they’re significant. Stars What Are They? Stars are essentially very large, very hot balls of gas, primarily hydrogen and helium. Their enormous mass means that their own gravity pulls them into a spherical shape, and the immense pressure and temperature this creates within them initiates nuclear fusion. Hydrogen atoms are fused together to make helium, and as this happens energy is released in the form of heat and light. Stars vary considerably in color and temperature, from around 50,000 K down to a mere 3,000 K. Hot stars emit more of their light towards the blue end of the spectrum; in the cases of very young and hot stars they may even be emitting a lot of ultraviolet light human observers cannot even see. Cooler stars emit more light towards the red end of the spectrum, and in fact many cool stars emit most of their light in the form of infrared. So although all stars emit light across the color spectrum, they emit light most strongly at certain wavelengths, depending on their temperature, and that in turn is reflected in their color. Astronomers classify stars according to their color, from hottest to coolest as spectral types O, B, A, F, G, K, and M. Of these, O-, B-, and A- type stars appear blue to white, F- and G-type stars are white to yellow, and K- and M-type stars are orange to red. Astronomers further subdivide these spectral types into ten classes, for example G0, G1, G2, G3, and so on through to G9. So a G1 star would be cooler than a G0 star, but a G9 star would be hotter than a K0 star. There are some unusual star classes as well. The most important of these from the perspective of backyard astronomers are carbon stars (sometimes called C-type stars) and Wolf-Rayet stars (sometimes called WR-type stars). Carbon stars are deep red stars that are even cooler than the orange M-type stars. Partly they’re red because they’re cool, but they’re redder than M-type stars because their atmospheres contain a lot of carbon. The heat and pressure inside a star fuses hydrogen into helium, but it can also synthesize other elements as well, including carbon and oxygen. Carbon stars are so old that they have accumulated a lot of carbon, and this comes to surface and forms patches of soot in the atmosphere. In the same way that dust in Earth’s atmosphere makes the setting Sun look redder than it does high up in the sky, this dust in the atmosphere of a carbon star scatters Appendix: What You’re Looking At 227 blue light while letting red light pass through, giving a carbon star its distinct red appearance. The patches of soot aren’t stable, and come and go on an irregular basis. In doing so the brightness of the carbon star varies, and carbon stars are variable stars, about which more will be said shortly. Wolf-Rayet stars are supergiant stars approaching the end of their life. Having used up most of their hydrogen, helium and other elements are being fused together. This process produces enormously high temperatures, and Wolf-Rayet stars are among the hottest known stars. Gamma Velorum, for example, has a surface temper- ature of 50,000 K. However, the tremendous heat and radiation produced by Wolf- Rayet stars creates winds moving up to 9 million km/hour, and needless to say this blasts off huge amounts of material into space. Indeed, what we see when observing Wolf-Rayet stars isn’t usually the star itself but the winds around it. Within a rela- tively short period of time, likely just a few million years, the fuel that powered this process is exhausted, and the star collapses into a planetary nebula or a supernova. How Big Are They? A star has to be above a certain size simply to have enough mass for nuclear reactions at its core to begin. Gravity comes from mass, and it’s gravity that squeezes the core of a star and thereby creates the incredible temperatures required for nuclear fusion to take place. At the core of a star such as the Sun the temperature will be around 15,700,000 K! The more massive a star, the hotter its core will be, and this means that nuclear reactions will proceed faster than in a less massive star. This brings us to a key thing about star sizes: the bigger the star, the shorter its life will be. Stars can be broadly divided into those stars that are ‘giants’ and those that are ‘dwarfs.’ The Sun is a dwarf star, while giants can be hundreds of times its mass. Astronomers normally divide stars into seven size categories, using Roman numbers running from I for the biggest stars (supergiants) through to VII for the smallest (white dwarfs). So, by combining the spectral type (i.e., the color of a star) with its size, you can quickly describe a star very accurately. This tends to be how professional astronomers describe stars. The Sun would be designated as a G2V star, i.e., a G- type star, hotter than a G3 star but cooler than a G1 star, and in terms of size a category V star, i.e., a dwarf. Alpha Centauri A is another G2V star, and its similarity to the Sun is one reason why it is so interesting. Sirius is an A1V star, a star similar in mass to the Sun, but very much hotter. On the other hand, the famous Garnet Star, Mu Cephei, is designated as a M2I star, a star that is not only cooler than the Sun but also much more massive. How Bright Are They? Some stars appear brighter than others because they are nearby. Both the Sun with Alpha Centauri A are G2V stars of similar size and temperature, and they both give 228 Go-To Telescopes Under Suburban Skies out about the same amount of light. But the Sun is a far brighter object from our vantage point on Earth simply because it is very much closer. Whereas Alpha Cen- tauri A is 41,300,000,000,000 km away, the Sun is 276,000 times closer at a distance of just 149,598,000 km. Put another way, stars of similar apparent brightness can be situated at very dif- ferent distances. Vega and Rigel seem equally bright when viewed from Earth, but Vega is a much closer star, just a mere 25 light years away, whereas Rigel is about 800 light years away.
Recommended publications
  • Mathématiques Et Espace
    Atelier disciplinaire AD 5 Mathématiques et Espace Anne-Cécile DHERS, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Peggy THILLET, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Yann BARSAMIAN, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Olivier BONNETON, Sciences - U (mathématiques) Cahier d'activités Activité 1 : L'HORIZON TERRESTRE ET SPATIAL Activité 2 : DENOMBREMENT D'ETOILES DANS LE CIEL ET L'UNIVERS Activité 3 : D'HIPPARCOS A BENFORD Activité 4 : OBSERVATION STATISTIQUE DES CRATERES LUNAIRES Activité 5 : DIAMETRE DES CRATERES D'IMPACT Activité 6 : LOI DE TITIUS-BODE Activité 7 : MODELISER UNE CONSTELLATION EN 3D Crédits photo : NASA / CNES L'HORIZON TERRESTRE ET SPATIAL (3 ème / 2 nde ) __________________________________________________ OBJECTIF : Détermination de la ligne d'horizon à une altitude donnée. COMPETENCES : ● Utilisation du théorème de Pythagore ● Utilisation de Google Earth pour évaluer des distances à vol d'oiseau ● Recherche personnelle de données REALISATION : Il s'agit ici de mettre en application le théorème de Pythagore mais avec une vision terrestre dans un premier temps suite à un questionnement de l'élève puis dans un second temps de réutiliser la même démarche dans le cadre spatial de la visibilité d'un satellite. Fiche élève ____________________________________________________________________________ 1. Victor Hugo a écrit dans Les Châtiments : "Les horizons aux horizons succèdent […] : on avance toujours, on n’arrive jamais ". Face à la mer, vous voyez l'horizon à perte de vue. Mais "est-ce loin, l'horizon ?". D'après toi, jusqu'à quelle distance peux-tu voir si le temps est clair ? Réponse 1 : " Sans instrument, je peux voir jusqu'à .................. km " Réponse 2 : " Avec une paire de jumelles, je peux voir jusqu'à ............... km " 2. Nous allons maintenant calculer à l'aide du théorème de Pythagore la ligne d'horizon pour une hauteur H donnée.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Announcement Upcoming Star Parties Special Recognition the President's Corner by Dell Vance, CVAS President
    CVAS Executive Committee Pres – Dell Vance - (435) 938-8328 Loaner Scope Coordinator/NSN Coordinator – [email protected] Garrett Smith – [email protected] Vice Pres- Bruce Horrocks Past President, Webmaster, Librarian – [email protected] Tom Westre – (435) 787-6380 [email protected] Treasurer- Brad Kropp - (435) 755-0877 Public Relations – Lyle Johnson - [email protected] Secretary – Wendell Waters (435) 213-9230 [email protected] Vol. 6 Number 6 February 2019 www.cvas-utahskies.org Meeting Announcement The President’s Corner By Dell Vance, CVAS President Our February meeting will be held Wednesday, th February 27 at 7 pm in Room 840 of the main BTC Campus. Enter on the east side of the building located at 1301 North 600 West. Dr. Paul Ricket of U of U will be discussing Black Holes. Upcoming Star Parties There are no “official” star parties scheduled for the month of January (but that doesn’t mean you can’t put one together on your own!!). Special Recognition President’s Corner Several CVAS members received “Recognition of By Dell Vance Exceptional Outreach” awards at our meeting in January. Janice Bradshaw, Gary Bradshaw, Harvey You “gotta love” winter skies in Cache Brown, Bonnie Schenk-Darrington, Alannah Valley! Most nights in January have been cloudy or Darrington, Blaine Dickey, Dale Hooper, Bruce foggy. The few nights that it was clear it was 12˚ F Horrocks, Lyle Johnson, Mark Kohler, Brad Kropp, or lower. I was sure that the Lunar Eclipse would Byron N Ray, Clark Salisbury, Garrett Smith, James be a wash out this year like it was last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosette Nebula and Monoceros Loop
    Oshkosh Scholar Page 43 Studying Complex Star-Forming Fields: Rosette Nebula and Monoceros Loop Chris Hathaway and Anthony Kuchera, co-authors Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva, Physics and Astronomy, faculty adviser Christopher Hathaway obtained a B.S. in physics in 2007 and is currently pursuing his masters in physics education at UW Oshkosh. He collaborated with Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva on his senior research project and presented their findings at theAmerican Astronomical Society meeting (2008), the Celebration of Scholarship at UW Oshkosh (2009), and the National Conference on Undergraduate Research in La Crosse, Wisconsin (2009). Anthony Kuchera graduated from UW Oshkosh in May 2008 with a B.S. in physics. He collaborated with Dr. Kaltcheva from fall 2006 through graduation. He presented his astronomy-related research at Posters in the Rotunda (2007 and 2008), the Wisconsin Space Conference (2007), the UW System Symposium for Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity (2007 and 2008), and the American Astronomical Society’s 211th meeting (2008). In December 2009 he earned an M.S. in physics from Florida State University where he is currently working toward a Ph.D. in experimental nuclear physics. Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva is a professor of physics and astronomy. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Sofia in Bulgaria. She joined the UW Oshkosh Physics and Astronomy Department in 2001. Her research interests are in the field of stellar photometry and its application to the study of Galactic star-forming fields and the spiral structure of the Milky Way. Abstract An investigation that presents a new analysis of the structure of the Northern Monoceros field was recently completed at the Department of Physics andAstronomy at UW Oshkosh.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 25, Number 9 September 2018
    Volume 25, Number 9 September 2018 From The Chair’s Report by Bernie Venasse Editor Wow, has Summer I hope everyone has had a great summer. After a two month break, we are about 2018 flown by so to start our monthly meetings again. fast! Some summer events: Our June event was rained out, the July event was clouded-out. I hope you enjoy this first Event Horizon of The public Perseid event was attended by over 900 visitors. A great effort was put the new “school forward by all the volunteers who handled the masses. Thank you all!! year”. Lakeland Park was the site of the August Solar and Celestial event. We welcomed Enjoy! several visitors to the Solar portion of the event. I was joined in the evening by several members who brought their scopes Although cloud and smoke obscured Bob Christmas, the night sky, we managed to get decent views of the moon to show the visiting Editor public. editor ‘AT’ Our September 14 speaker will be Kevin Salwach. Kevin will speak to us about amateurastronomy.org Naked-eye Astronomy. (Continued on page 2) IN THIS ISSUE: § Eye Candy § § The Sky For September 2018 Treasurer’s Report § § Upcoming McCallion Planetarium Shows Cartoon Corner § § CANON and NIKON…taking a walk on the DARK side… Upcoming Events § NASA’s Space Place Contact Information Hamilton Amateur Astronomers Event Horizon September 2018 Page 1 Chair’s Report (continued) Our Annual General Meeting takes place at the October meeting. It’s at this meeting that we look after most of the club’s business for the year, (the delivery of the club’s financial report and the election of the club’s council for the upcoming year).
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Constellations
    Winter Constellations *Orion *Canis Major *Monoceros *Canis Minor *Gemini *Auriga *Taurus *Eradinus *Lepus *Monoceros *Cancer *Lynx *Ursa Major *Ursa Minor *Draco *Camelopardalis *Cassiopeia *Cepheus *Andromeda *Perseus *Lacerta *Pegasus *Triangulum *Aries *Pisces *Cetus *Leo (rising) *Hydra (rising) *Canes Venatici (rising) Orion--Myth: Orion, the great ​ ​ hunter. In one myth, Orion boasted he would kill all the wild animals on the earth. But, the earth goddess Gaia, who was the protector of all animals, produced a gigantic scorpion, whose body was so heavily encased that Orion was unable to pierce through the armour, and was himself stung to death. His companion Artemis was greatly saddened and arranged for Orion to be immortalised among the stars. Scorpius, the scorpion, was placed on the opposite side of the sky so that Orion would never be hurt by it again. To this day, Orion is never seen in the sky at the same time as Scorpius. DSO’s ● ***M42 “Orion Nebula” (Neb) with Trapezium A stellar ​ ​ ​ nursery where new stars are being born, perhaps a thousand stars. These are immense clouds of interstellar gas and dust collapse inward to form stars, mainly of ionized hydrogen which gives off the red glow so dominant, and also ionized greenish oxygen gas. The youngest stars may be less than 300,000 years old, even as young as 10,000 years old (compared to the Sun, 4.6 billion years old). 1300 ly. ​ ​ 1 ● *M43--(Neb) “De Marin’s Nebula” The star-forming ​ “comma-shaped” region connected to the Orion Nebula. ● *M78--(Neb) Hard to see. A star-forming region connected to the ​ Orion Nebula.
    [Show full text]
  • The Skyscraper 2009 04.Indd
    A Better Galaxy Guide: Early Spring M67: One of the most ancient open clusters known and Craig Cortis is a great novelty in this regard. Located 1.7° due W of mag NGC 2419: 3.25° SE of mag 6.2 66 Aurigae. Hard to find 4.3 Alpha Cancri. and see; at E end of short row of two mag 7.5 stars. Highly NGC 2775: Located 3.7° ENE of mag 3.1 Zeta Hydrae. significant and worth the effort —may be approximately (Look for “Head of Hydra” first.) 300,000 light years distant and qualify as an extragalactic NGC 2903: Easily found at 1.5° due S of mag 4.3 Lambda cluster. Named the Intergalactic Wanderer. Leonis. NGC 2683: Marks NW “crook” of coathanger-type triangle M95: One of three bright galaxies forming a compact with easy double star mag 4.2 Iota Cancri (which is SSW by triangle, along with M96 and M105. All three can be seen 4.8°) and mag 3.1 Alpha Lyncis (at 6° to the ENE). together in a low power, wide field view. M105 is at the NE tip of triangle, midway between stars 52 and 53 Leonis, mag Object Type R.A. Dec. Mag. Size 5.5 and 5.3 respectively —M95 is at W tip. Lynx NGC 3521: Located 0.5° due E of mag 6.0 62 Leonis. M65: One of a pair of bright galaxies that can be seen in NGC 2419 GC 07h 38.1m +38° 53’ 10.3 4.2’ a wide field view along with M66, which lies just E.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • A Handbook of Double Stars, with a Catalogue of Twelve Hundred
    The original of this bool< is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924064295326 3 1924 064 295 326 Production Note Cornell University Library pro- duced this volume to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. It was scanned using Xerox soft- ware and equipment at 600 dots per inch resolution and com- pressed prior to storage using CCITT Group 4 compression. The digital data were used to create Cornell's replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Stand- ard Z39. 48-1984. The production of this volume was supported in part by the Commission on Pres- ervation and Access and the Xerox Corporation. Digital file copy- right by Cornell University Library 1991. HANDBOOK DOUBLE STARS. <-v6f'. — A HANDBOOK OF DOUBLE STARS, WITH A CATALOGUE OF TWELVE HUNDRED DOUBLE STARS AND EXTENSIVE LISTS OF MEASURES. With additional Notes bringing the Measures up to 1879, FOR THE USE OF AMATEURS. EDWD. CROSSLEY, F.R.A.S.; JOSEPH GLEDHILL, F.R.A.S., AND^^iMES Mt^'^I^SON, M.A., F.R.A.S. "The subject has already proved so extensive, and still ptomises so rich a harvest to those who are inclined to be diligent in the pursuit, that I cannot help inviting every lover of astronomy to join with me in observations that must inevitably lead to new discoveries." Sir Wm. Herschel. *' Stellae fixac, quae in ccelo conspiciuntur, sunt aut soles simplices, qualis sol noster, aut systemata ex binis vel interdum pluribus solibus peculiari nexu physico inter se junccis composita.
    [Show full text]
  • FIXED STARS a SOLAR WRITER REPORT for Churchill Winston WRITTEN by DIANA K ROSENBERG Page 2
    FIXED STARS A SOLAR WRITER REPORT for Churchill Winston WRITTEN BY DIANA K ROSENBERG Page 2 Prepared by Cafe Astrology cafeastrology.com Page 23 Churchill Winston Natal Chart Nov 30 1874 1:30 am GMT +0:00 Blenhein Castle 51°N48' 001°W22' 29°‚ 53' Tropical ƒ Placidus 02' 23° „ Ý 06° 46' Á ¿ 21° 15° Ý 06' „ 25' 23° 13' Œ À ¶29° Œ 28° … „ Ü É Ü 06° 36' 26' 25° 43' Œ 51'Ü áá Œ 29° ’ 29° “ àà … ‘ à ‹ – 55' á á 55' á †32' 16° 34' ¼ † 23° 51'Œ 23° ½ † 06' 25° “ ’ † Ê ’ ‹ 43' 35' 35' 06° ‡ Š 17° 43' Œ 09° º ˆ 01' 01' 07° ˆ ‰ ¾ 23° 22° 08° 02' ‡ ¸ Š 46' » Ï 06° 29°ˆ 53' ‰ Page 234 Astrological Summary Chart Point Positions: Churchill Winston Planet Sign Position House Comment The Moon Leo 29°Le36' 11th The Sun Sagittarius 7°Sg43' 3rd Mercury Scorpio 17°Sc35' 2nd Venus Sagittarius 22°Sg01' 3rd Mars Libra 16°Li32' 1st Jupiter Libra 23°Li34' 1st Saturn Aquarius 9°Aq35' 5th Uranus Leo 15°Le13' 11th Neptune Aries 28°Ar26' 8th Pluto Taurus 21°Ta25' 8th The North Node Aries 25°Ar51' 8th The South Node Libra 25°Li51' 2nd The Ascendant Virgo 29°Vi55' 1st The Midheaven Gemini 29°Ge53' 10th The Part of Fortune Capricorn 8°Cp01' 4th Chart Point Aspects Planet Aspect Planet Orb App/Sep The Moon Semisquare Mars 1°56' Applying The Moon Trine Neptune 1°10' Separating The Moon Trine The North Node 3°45' Separating The Moon Sextile The Midheaven 0°17' Applying The Sun Semisquare Jupiter 0°50' Applying The Sun Sextile Saturn 1°52' Applying The Sun Trine Uranus 7°30' Applying Mercury Square Uranus 2°21' Separating Mercury Opposition Pluto 3°49' Applying Venus Sextile
    [Show full text]
  • List of Easy Double Stars for Winter and Spring  = Easy  = Not Too Difficult  = Difficult but Possible
    List of Easy Double Stars for Winter and Spring = easy = not too difficult = difficult but possible 1. Sigma Cassiopeiae (STF 3049). 23 hr 59.0 min +55 deg 45 min This system is tight but very beautiful. Use a high magnification (150x or more). Primary: 5.2, yellow or white Seconary: 7.2 (3.0″), blue 2. Eta Cassiopeiae (Achird, STF 60). 00 hr 49.1 min +57 deg 49 min This is a multiple system with many stars, but I will restrict myself to the brightest one here. Primary: 3.5, yellow. Secondary: 7.4 (13.2″), purple or brown 3. 65 Piscium (STF 61). 00 hr 49.9 min +27 deg 43 min Primary: 6.3, yellow Secondary: 6.3 (4.1″), yellow 4. Psi-1 Piscium (STF 88). 01 hr 05.7 min +21 deg 28 min This double forms a T-shaped asterism with Psi-2, Psi-3 and Chi Piscium. Psi-1 is the uppermost of the four. Primary: 5.3, yellow or white Secondary: 5.5 (29.7), yellow or white 5. Zeta Piscium (STF 100). 01 hr 13.7 min +07 deg 35 min Primary: 5.2, white or yellow Secondary: 6.3, white or lilac (or blue) 6. Gamma Arietis (Mesarthim, STF 180). 01 hr 53.5 min +19 deg 18 min “The Ram’s Eyes” Primary: 4.5, white Secondary: 4.6 (7.5″), white 7. Lambda Arietis (H 5 12). 01 hr 57.9 min +23 deg 36 min Primary: 4.8, white or yellow Secondary: 6.7 (37.1″), silver-white or blue 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Keck Spectra of Brown Dwarf Candidates and a Precise
    TABLE 1 Summary of Optical Imaging for Alpha Persei Telescope Area Covered Limiting Magnitude (sq.degrees) (R/I) CWRU Schmidt 3.2 21.5/20.5 MHO 1.2m 1.1 22.0/20.7 KPNO 0.9m 0.5 21.5/20.5 KPNO 4.0m 1.3 22.4/21.0 KPNO 4.0m a (2.5) ≈ 24/≈ 23 aBouvier et al. (1999) TABLE 2 Photometry of Alpha Persei Stars Star α(J2000) δ(J2000) Ic R − Ic K Ic − K AP300 3 17 27.6 49 36 53.0 17.85 2.18 14.62 3.23 AP301 3 18 09.2 49 25 19.0 17.75 2.22 14.14 3.61 AP302 3 19 08.4 48 43 48.5 17.63 2.08 ······ AP303 3 19 10.9 48 42 20.0 16.98 1.88 ······ AP304 3 19 13.2 48 31 55.0 18.83 2.40 ······ AP305 3 19 21.7 49 23 32.0 18.48 2.34 ······ AP306 3 19 41.8 50 30 42.0 18.40 2.34 14.9 3.5 AP307 3 20 20.9 48 01 05.0 17.08 2.01 ······ AP308 3 20 59.7 48 18 37.0 16.71 1.89 ······ AP309 3 22 40.6 48 00 36.0 16.57 1.88 ······ AP275 a 3 23 03.3 48 53 07.0 17.25 2.20 ······ AP310 3 23 04.7 48 16 13.0 17.80 2.33 14.55 3.25 AP311 3 23 08.4 48 04 52.5 17.70 2.12 14.30 3.40 AP312 3 23 14.8 48 11 56.0 18.60 2.41 15.21 3.39 AP313 3 24 08.1 48 48 30.0 17.55 2.13 ······ AP314 3 25 19.6 49 17 58.0 18.20 2.26 15.15 3.05 AP315 3 26 34.5 49 07 46.0 18.20 2.34 14.80 3.40 arXiv:astro-ph/9909207v2 15 Sep 1999 AP316 3 27 01.3 49 14 40.0 17.75 2.18 14.48 3.27 AP317 3 28 06.0 48 45 13.5 17.85 2.29 15.0 2.85 AP318 3 30 42.5 48 21 27.0 17.45 2.16 14.10 3.35 AP319 3 31 03.2 49 02 58.0 16.89 1.95 ······ AP320 3 31 25.3 49 02 52.0 16.79 1.90 ······ AP321 3 32 18.7 49 32 18.0 17.75 2.20 ······ AP322 3 33 08.3 49 37 56.5 17.60 2.14 14.57 3.03 AP323 3 33 20.7 48 45 51.0 17.50 2.13 14.33 3.17 AP324 3 33 48.2 48 52 30.5 18.10 2.36 14.68 3.42 AP325 3 35 47.2 49 17 43.0 17.65 2.30 14.14 3.51 AP326 3 38 55.2 48 57 31.0 18.70 2.40 15.09 3.61 aAP275 is from Prosser (1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/ Astero2007.Pdf) and by Aerts Et Al (2010)
    This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights and duplication or sale of all or part is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for research, private study, criticism/review or educational purposes. Electronic or print copies are for your own personal, non- commercial use and shall not be passed to any other individual. No quotation may be published without proper acknowledgement. For any other use, or to quote extensively from the work, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder/s. i Fundamental Properties of Solar-Type Eclipsing Binary Stars, and Kinematic Biases of Exoplanet Host Stars Richard J. Hutcheon Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Research Institute: School of Environmental and Physical Sciences and Applied Mathematics. University of Keele June 2015 ii iii Abstract This thesis is in three parts: 1) a kinematical study of exoplanet host stars, 2) a study of the detached eclipsing binary V1094 Tau and 3) and observations of other eclipsing binaries. Part I investigates kinematical biases between two methods of detecting exoplanets; the ground based transit and radial velocity methods. Distances of the host stars from each method lie in almost non-overlapping groups. Samples of host stars from each group are selected. They are compared by means of matching comparison samples of stars not known to have exoplanets. The detection methods are found to introduce a negligible bias into the metallicities of the host stars but the ground based transit method introduces a median age bias of about -2 Gyr.
    [Show full text]