DOCSLIB.ORG

City Council and Successor Agency to the Brea Redevelopment Agency Agenda Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City Council and Successor Agency to the Brea Redevelopment Agency Agenda Tuesday, March 21, 2017 City Council and Successor Agency Tuesday, March 21, 2017 to the Brea Redevelopment 5:30 p.m. - Closed Session 6:00 p.m. - Study Session Agency Agenda 7:00 p.m. - General Session Cecilia Hupp, Mayor Glenn Parker, Mayor Pro Tem Christine Marick, Council Member Marty Simonoff, Council Member Steven Vargas, Council Member This agenda contains a brief general description of each item Council will consider. The City Clerk has on file copies of written documentation relating to each item of business on this Agenda available for public inspection. Contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 990-7756 or view the Agenda and related materials on the City’s website at www.cityofbrea.net. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office at 1 Civic Center Circle, Brea, CA during normal business hours. Such documents may also be available on the City’s website subject to staff’s ability to post documents before the meeting. Procedures for Addressing the Council The Council encourages interested people to address this legislative body by making a brief presentation on a public hearing item when the Mayor calls the item or address other items under Matters from the Audience. State Law prohibits the City Council from responding to or acting upon matters not listed on this agenda. The Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons the opportunity to speak, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. Council rules prohibit clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. PLEASE SILENCE ALL PAGERS, CELL PHONES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT WHILE COUNCIL IS IN SESSION. Thank you. Special Accommodations In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 990-7757. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable City staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. (28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II) Important Notice The City of Brea shows both live broadcasts and replays of City Council Meetings on Brea Cable Channel 3 and over the Internet at www.cityofbrea.net. Your attendance at this public meeting may result in the recording and broadcast of your image and/or voice as previously described. CLOSED SESSION 5:30 p.m. - Executive Conference Room Level Three CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL - COUNCIL 1. Public Comment Closed Session may convene to consider matters of purchase / sale of real property (G. C. §54956.8), pending litigation [G.C.§54956.9(d)(1)], potential litigation [G.C. §54956.9(d)(2)(3) or (4)], liability claims (G. C. §54961) or personnel items (G.C.§54957.6). Records not available for public inspection. 2. Conference with City's Labor Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code Section §54957.6 and the Brea City Employees' Association (BCEA) - Mario E. Maldonado Negotiator STUDY SESSION 6:00 p.m. - Executive Conference Room Level Three CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL - COUNCIL 3. Public Comment 4. Clarify Regular Meeting Topics DISCUSSION ITEMS 5. Parks, Recreation and Human Services Commission Resignation and Recruitment Process 6. LLMD #1 Special/General Benefit Follow-Up 7. Organic Waste Recycling Update REPORTS 8. Council Member Report GENERAL SESSION 7:00 p.m. - Council Chamber Plaza Level CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL - COUNCIL 9. Pledge of Allegiance: Representatives from Brea Girl Scouts 10. Invocation: Pastor Rich Dannenbring, Christ Lutheran Church 11. Proclamation: Girl Scout Week 12. Commendation: Connie Lanzisera, Parks, Recreation, and Human Services Commission 13. Centennial Committee Update 14. Report - Prior Study Session 15. Community Announcements 16. Matters from the Audience 17. Response to Public Inquiries - Mayor / City Manager ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS 18. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea Adopting Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 16-03 - Omnibus Code Update Amending Chapter 18.08 of Title 18, and Chapters 20.00, 20.200, 20.208, 20.212, 20.216 and 20.220 of Title 20 of the Brea Municipal Code - Approve Ordinance No. 1191. 19. Playpower LT Farmington, Inc Purchase for Little Tikes Playground Equipment and Benches for Laurel School/Lagos de Moreno Park in the Amount of $162,294.89 - Approve Purchase of Playground Equipment and Benches, Funding is Available in the CIP budget. 20. Plans and Specifications for The Tracks At Brea Segment 4 Project 7873 - Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize City Clerk to Advertise and Receive Bids, There are Sufficient Grant Funds for this Project with no Impact to the General Fund. CONSENT CALENDAR - The City Council/Successor Agency approves all Consent Calendar matters with one motion unless Council/Agency or Staff requests further discussion of a particular item. Items of concern regarding Consent Calendar matters should be presented during “Matters from the Audience." CITY COUNCIL - CONSENT 21. March 7, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes - Approve. 22. Traffic Signal Synchronization Improvements on Imperial Highway/SR 90 - Project 7714 - Approve Cooperative Agreement with City of La Habra. The Project is budgeted Within the Capital Improvement Program, Which has Appropriated $258,344 from the Traffic Impact Fee (Fund 540) for the City's 20% Match. 23. Carbon Canyon Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) - Approve the 2017 CWPP for Carbon Canyon and Mayor to Sign the Document on Behalf of the City, Grant Monies Will be Utilized. 24. March 10 and 17, 2017 City Check Registers - Approve 25. Treasurer's Report for the City of Brea for Period Ending February 28, 2017 - Receive and File. CITY/SUCCESSOR AGENCY - CONSENT 26. Treasurer's Report for the Successor Agency to the Brea Redevelopment Agency for Period Ending February 28, 2017 - Receive and File. ADMINISTRATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS 27. City Manager 28. City Attorney COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT Agenda Item 5. City of Brea COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: City Manager DATE: 03/21/2017 SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation and Human Services Commission Resignation and Recruitment Process RECOMMENDATION Accept resignation of Parks, Recreation and Human Services Commissioner Connie Lanzisera effective March 2, 2017; designate two (2) City Council Members to serve as the Interview Committee; set the recruitment timeline; and direct staff to schedule applicant interviews accordingly. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On March 2, 2017, Connie Lanzisera resigned from her appointed position on the Parks, Recreation and Human Services Commission. The Brea City Code defines the process for unscheduled vacancies. Government Code Section 54974 requires that the appointment to fill the vacancy for the unexpired term to occur within 30 days. The term for the vacant position expires on December 31, 2018. The following is the recruitment timeline: Notice of Vacancy was posted by City Clerk's Office on Thursday, March 16, 2017 and applications were made available to the public at that time. The application deadline will be Monday, March 27, 2017 at 5:30 p.m. Phone/In-person interviews with the Interview Committee will be conducted as applications are received. Council will make the appointment on April 4, 2017. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: William Gallardo, City Manager Prepared by: Lillian Harris-Neal Agenda Item 18. City of Brea COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: City Manager DATE: 03/21/2017 SUBJECT: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea Adopting Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 16-03 - Omnibus Code Update Amending Chapter 18.08 of Title 18, and Chapters 20.00, 20.200, 20.208, 20.212, 20.216 and 20.220 of Title 20 of the Brea Municipal Code RECOMMENDATION Approve Ordinance No. 1191. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On February 21, 2017, the City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 1191. Municipal Codes require periodic updates to ensure consistency with City policies and State law, to improve clarity and to better serve the public. Staff has identified a number of provisions in the Brea Zoning Code requiring review and revisions. The goals for this omnibus amendment are to: Provide clarity related to certain Zoning Code provisions; and Ensure internal consistency. The updates proposed below consist of deleting/replacing definitions, updating standards and deleting outdated or inconsistent information. If approved, the proposed amendments will be adopted as part of an “omnibus” ordinance comprised of updates to eight sections of the Zoning Code. An omnibus ordinance is the packaging of a collection of amendments relatively small in scale, having a limited scope of impact into one “omnibus” ordinance. These amendments correct typographical errors, fix section references, and clean up existing Code language. State law allows a municipality to submit up to five omnibus ordinances within a one year period. This code amendment update request would be the City’s first proposed omnibus ordinance amendment for the year 2017. DISCUSSION Over time, staff has identified updates needed for the Code due to changes in policy, new laws and standards, or modifications to other sections of the Code. As part of this review process, staff worked with other departments and divisions, technical experts and the City Attorney to review and consider the proposed changes. Additionally, staff surveyed and analyzed codes and policies from other agencies as appropriate and applicable. The result of this effort is four code amendments to various sections of the Municipal Code. To compare current and proposed text, language to be deleted is shown in strikethrough font and language to be added is shown in underline font. The following provides an overview of the current Code, the issue, and the proposed amendment: Code Amendment 1: Definition of Director Section 18.08.100 of Chapter 18.08 of the City Municipal Code defines “Director” as The Director of Development Services.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • When the Next Fire Comes, Will You Be Ready?
    Carbon Canyon FSC The Carbon Canyon Fire Safe Council’s mission is: Board of Directors to preserve our canyon’s natural and man-made resources on public and private property by development and enforcement Carbon Canyon FSC President: Charlie Blank of ecologically sound and appropriate fire safety measures. P.O. Box 1328 Vice President: Eric Johnson FALL 2019 NEWSLETTER Chino Hills, CA 91709 Secretary-Treasurer: Paul Spitzzeri When the Next Fire Comes, Will You Be Ready? Fire Station Open House The Fire Safe Council Chino Valley Fire District Open House at will be hosting an event on Station 61 (5078 Schaefer Ave., Chino) and the Wildfire Emergency Fire training center (5092 Schaefer Ave., Chino) will Preparedness on Sunday, Schlotterbeck Melanie be hosted on Saturday, October 12th from 9 AM September 8th. It runs from to 2 PM. 2:00 – 4:00 PM at Western 2008 Fire Remembered Hills Golf Course at 1800 Canyon residents came to the Chino Hills • Meet your local firefighters Carbon Canyon Road in State Park Discovery Center to remember and reflect • Tour the fire station and training facility Chino Hills. Let’s remember on the devastation of the Freeway Complex Fire. They • See the fire engines that respond to together and learn from were joined by hosts including Hills For Everyone, emergencies each other all that we each Carbon Canyon Fire Safe Council, Chino Valley • Watch live demonstrations can do to prepare for the Independent Fire District, Brea Fire, and the Chino • Learn valuable safety tips Ed Schumann next fire. Hills State Park Interpretive Association. Photo poster There will be boards, photo albums, fire preparedness materials presentations, starting at 2, on preparing your house and videos were on display.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 9-11 Wildfire Tech Reports
    APPENDIX 9.11 WILDFIRE TECHNICAL REPORTS ACCEPTED DRAFT Murrieta Hills FIRE PROTECTION TECHNICAL REPORT Plan No. SP 012-3164, TTM 35853 Prepared for: Murrieta Fire and Rescue 41825 Juniper Street Murrieta, California 92562 Contact: Scott Ferguson, Fire Chief On behalf of Applicant: Benchmark Pacific 550 Laguna Drive, Suite B Carlsbad, California 92008 Contact: Richard Robotta, Vice President Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Michael Huff, Principal AUGUST 2019 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Murrieta Hills Fire Protection Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... V ES.1 Findings for Maximum Dead-End Road Length .................................................. vii 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Intent ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Applicable Codes/Existing Regulations ................................................................. 2 1.3 Proposed Project Summary ..................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Location ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Current Site and Vicinity Land Use ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Responses to Comments
    Responses to Comments Final Environmental Impact Report page 23 4. Responses to Comments A. Topical Responses Topical Response 1 – Fire Hazard This response is provided to address topical issues that were identified several times within the comment letters on the DEIR. Reference to this Topical Response is noted in response individual comment letters on this topic. Seven fires have burned within one mile of the Project site over the historic fire data record as shown on Exhibit 5-65 - Fire History Map on page 5-284 of the DEIR. The average interval between wildfires in the area was calculated to be 5.5 years with intervals ranging between 0 years (multiple fires in the same year) and 12 years. As shown below, the interval between fires on the Project site has been much greater with a 28-year interval between the Owl Fire and the Freeway Complex Fire. Historical records show that three wildfires have burned within the Project site since the beginning of the historical fire data record: • Santa Ana Canyon Fire in 1943 • Owl Fire in 1980 • Freeway Complex Fire in 2008 The Fire Protection and Emergency Evacuation Plan (FPEP) prepared by Dudek (June 2013) was used to assess the existing condition and the historical fire data, and to provide recommendations for minimizing the risks associated with potential future fire events. The FPEP is included in the DEIR as Appendix J and is analyzed in DEIR Section 5.7 (Hazards and Hazardous Materials). The preparers of the FPEP reviewed numerous information sources during the analysis phase of the document’s preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project
    Final Mitigated Negative Declaration Response to Comments on Draft Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project Subject: Response to Public Review Comments and Final Mitigated Negative Declaration This document has been prepared to respond to comments received on the Draft Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) prepared for the Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project (SCH#2019109096). The Draft IS-MND found that with implementation of the mitigation measures, impacts on the environment from the proposed project were less than significant. The list of comment letters received by the City of Lake Forest are listed below. Letter No. and Commenting Agency Date 1 State Clearinghouse December 3, 2019 2 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 12 December 2, 2019 None of the comments received identified new impacts or resulted in a substantial increase in the severity of impacts. Responses to the comments received do not constitute new information that warrants recirculation of the Draft IS-MND. This Response to Comments (RTC) Document provides responses to comments received. Per the comments received, no changes to the Draft IS-MND were necessary. This RTC Document, together with the Draft IS-MND, constitutes the Final IS-MND for the Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project. Amanda Lauffer Date of Issuance of Associate Planner Final Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Lake Forest Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project Responses to Comments on the Draft IS-MND 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT IS-MND This document is in response to comments received on the Draft Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS-MND) prepared for the proposed Saddleback Community Church Expansion Project (project).
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Services Operational Assessment
    OTAY RANCH VILLAGE RESORT Village 13 FIRE SERVICES OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for the San Diego County Fire Authority, by: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Feb. 1, 2020 Table of Contents Page The Project 2 Analysis Approach 2 Site Characterization 4 Climate 4 Fire History 5 Wildfire Factors 7 Offshore Winds 7 Onshore Winds 7 Fuels 8 Topography 8 Fire Behavior 9 Rate of Spread 9 Worst-Case Fire Trajectory 1 0 Spotting and Fire Branding 1 0 Fire Ignition Sources 11 Fire Modeling 11 Public Safety Actions 1 1 Evacuation 12 Temporary Safe Refuge 12 Public Safety Action Points 13 Emergency Messaging 13 Evacuation Center Locations 13 Fire Services 14 Fire Services Providers 14 Fire Service Response 15 Response Time Analysis 15 Compaction of Development 16 I mplications for Wildfire Operations 1 7 Potential Worst-Case Loss 17 Development Wildfire Resistance 19 Water Systems 19 Construction 19 Fuel Modification 20 Additional Measures 21 Summary of Findings 22 Significant Changes 23 References 24 The Project Otay Ranch Resort Village- Village 13 is a proposed planned community development, immediately north of Lower Otay Lake and east of the City of Chula Vista, California. This report collectively refers to the project as “Village 13”. The Project consists of a maximum of 1,938 residential units (1,881 single-family units and 57 multifamily units), 40,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 10.1-acre school site, 25.1 acres of public/private parks, a 6.1 acre homeowners’ association neighborhood facility, a 2.3- acre joint use site for fire station and sheriff storefront, 9.0 miles of multi-use community trails and pathways, 790.3 acres of preserve/open space land to be conveyed to Otay Ranch Resource Management Preserve, an additional 69.3 acres of biological open space, and 76.4 acres of internal open space.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Canyon Community Wildfire Protection Plan March 2017
    CARBON CANYON COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN MARCH 2017 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Table of Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY OVERVIEW ...........................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Community Location ...........................................................................................................1 Demographics ......................................................................................................................2 Project Area Plant Communities and Habitat ......................................................................2 Current Condition of Project Area Habitat ..........................................................................4 Project Area Topography .....................................................................................................5 Project Area Weather ...........................................................................................................6 Project Are Fire History .......................................................................................................6 SECTION II - IDENTIFICATION OF COMMUNITY VALUES AT RISK ................................8 Local Preparedness and Firefighting Capability ..................................................................8 Assessing the Hazards and Values .......................................................................................8 Determining Hazard
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Element
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 6: Safety Element 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND CONTENT ...................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................... 2 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCUMENTS .............................................................................................................. 3 Other General Plan Elements .................................................................................................................... 3 Area Plans .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ....................................................................................... 3 RELATIONSHIP TO THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ....................................................................... 4 HAZARD REDUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. ISSUES AND POLICIES ............................................................................................................................ 6 CODE CONFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Victims Find Rebuilding Hard
    Wildfire Victims Find Rebuilding Hard http://www.ocregister.com/news/-219295--.html First came the fire, jumping the freeway and moving with such ferocity that Brian Stanley and his then-4-year-old son didn’t have time to put on shoes as they ran out of their burning house. The looters came next, combing the ashes for jewelry and valuables, ripping copper piping from the rubble of burned-out homes. These days it’s snakes and burglars that worry Stanley as he prepares to finally move back into his rebuilt Anaheim Hills home, one year after the Freeway Complex Fire destroyed it along with hundreds of other structures. Look back at the fires) Of the six homes destroyed on Stanley’s block, only one other house is currently under construction. The dirt lots mean more attractive space for wildlife. Stanley has killed three rattlesnakes in his backyard since the fire. Another neighbor found one in his garage. There have also been five burglaries near his house in the last year, something Stanley attributes to having fewer neighbors keeping an eye on things. But with all his worries, Stanley still knows he is lucky: He is about to become one of the first people in Anaheim Hills to move back into a home destroyed in the fire. In Anaheim Hills, building permits have been issued for just seven single family homes and nine apartments. The statistics aren’t much better in Yorba Linda. Despite efforts by officials in both cities to waive fees and expedite permits for fire victims, rebuilding efforts are slow.
    [Show full text]
  • ROPER Consulting 806 Canada St
    ROPER Consulting 806 Canada St. Ojai, CA 93023 Phone: (805) 377-0493 E-Mail: [email protected] Subject: Esperanza Hills Housing Project Date: August 31, 2018 To: Board of Supervisors and Planning Commissioner (Via Email: [email protected]/ [email protected]) Dear Supervisors and Commissioners: I have been asked by Protect Our Homes and Hills to evaluate the need for a second, daily public access for the Esperanza Hills housing project. I have reviewed aerial photography of the site and surrounding areas on Google Maps and reviewed the proposed site plan for 340 residential units. This letter is in addition to my prior letter dated May 8, 2017 citing initial points to be addressed. In summary, it is my recommendation that there be two, full-time daily access points for this project. Ingress/egress issues were documented in the Orange County Fire Authority’s 2008 Freeway Complex Fire After-Action Report. Adding the proposed 340 units with associated vehicle traffic will compound the prior evacuation issues and create unacceptable risks to the public and first responders. I have been in the fire service for 40-years serving as the Ventura County Fire Chief, from 1998 to 2012, and as the Nevada State Forester, from 2015 to 2016. I was part of the team that developed California’s response to major emergencies, which included policy development at the local, State and Federal level. I also helped create the National Wildland Fire Cohesive Strategy. While serving in “all-hazard” emergency response role, I focused on the wildland fire topic. The purpose of the Environmental Impact Review (EIR) process is to present proposed projects and identify areas of concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Investments in Fire and EMS in San Diego, Los Angeles and Orange Counties: an Update
    Investments in Fire and EMS in San Diego, Los Angeles and Orange Counties: An Update W. Erik Bruvold KEY FINDINGS 1) San Diego continues to spend SIGNIFICANTLY less than either Los Angeles or Orange County in respect to per-capita spending on fire and emergency medical services. In 2009-2010, however, that gap shrunk. 2) This gap persists even accounting for the approximately $28 million that CALFIRE invests in state general funds in serving certain areas in San Diego County. 3) Per capita spending differences lead to differences in staffing ratios. Larger San Diego fire agencies budget fewer positions per 10,000 residents when compared to larger sized fire agencies in Orange and Los Angeles Counties. 4) These differences are also evident in budgets for law enforcement, with San Diego jurisdictions cumulatively spending significantly less on law enforcement and corrections ($400) than either Orange County ($460) or Los Angeles County ($597). 1 San Diego’s fire risk is getting worse. According to the 2010 Strategic Fire Plan for California, between 1950 and 2000 an average of 100 and 150 thousand acres of shrubs were burned in the state each year. Between 2000 and 2008, that spiked, with an average of 270,000 acres of shrub lands being burned.1 Much of this is attributable to the devastating wildfires in 2003 and 2007 that, combined, burned more than 450,000 acres, destroyed 4,500 structures, and caused 17 deaths.2 In the years following the Witch and Cedar Fires numerous studies and reports have been released that have looked at how the San Diego region can better prepare to fight future wildfire events.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2020 Newsletter
    Friends of Harbors, Beaches and Parks (FHBP) works to Friends of Harbors, Beaches and Parks NON-PROFIT ORG Friends of Harbors, Beaches and Parks Spring 2020 protect the natural lands, waterways, and beaches of P.O. Box 9256 U.S. POSTAGE Newport Beach, CA 92658 PAID Orange County. Learn more at: SANTA ANA, CA PERMIT 43 Outdoors www.FHBP.org in Orange County Trail Safety is Imperative By: Michael Wellborn, FHBP Board President The County of Orange, following the regulations of the state vehicle code, prohibits motorized bicycles on dirt trails in the wilderness parks. FHBP supports this policy despite increasing pressure to allow “e-bikes” (bicycles with electric The Canyon 1 fire burns Chino Hills State Park south of the 91 Freeway. motors). The key reason for this position revolves around our Anaheim of City parks already being a big attraction for local hikers, bikers, and equestrians. With over three million Orange County Fire Study Highlights High Risk Areas residents living nearby, along with those from nearby counties venturing to our parks—trail use has greatly increased over the By: Melanie Schlotterbeck, FHBP Consultant The risk of more frequent burns is that the vegetation “type past decade. This is a positive benefit for our residents. Yet the In August of 2015, Friends of Harbors, Beaches and Parks converts” into a non-native grassland, which by its very nature popularity of the trails has also brought an increase in conflicts (FHBP) completed a 100-year study of wildland fires that burned is more flammable, easier to ignite, and spreads fire faster.
    [Show full text]
  • CANYON 2 FIRE October 9, 2017
    ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY CANYON 2 FIRE October 9, 2017 s A Report to the Orange County Fire Authority Board of Directors AFTER ACTION REPORT CANYON 2 FIRE TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 5 HISTORICAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................................................. 7 FIGURE 1: SEVENTY-YEAR MAJOR FIRE HISTORY LIST—ORANGE COUNTY ..................................................................... 8 FIGURE 2: SEVENTY-YEAR MAJOR FIRE HISTORY MAP—ORANGE COUNTY .................................................................... 9 FIRE PREVENTION AND COMMUNITY EDUCATION ........................................................................................ 10 ADVANCE PLANNING / DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS CENTER ....................................................................... 13 FIGURE 3: STATION COVERAGE LEVELS ...................................................................................................................16 FIGURE 4: 12+HOUR STATION COVERAGE ..............................................................................................................16 INCIDENT NARRATIVE ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]