Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan CITY OF FONTANA LHMP 2017 1 DocuSignEnvelopeID:1E7E9D22- 46DB-4DD0-9933-9659C37000AA RESOLUTIONNO.2018-072 ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFFONTANA APPROVINGANDADOPTINGTHE2017LOCALHAZARDMITIGATION PLAN. WHEREAS,the CityofFontanahavinggatheredinformationandrevisedtheCityof FontanaLocalHazardMitigationPlantoreduceoreliminatetheeffectsofhazardstothe residentsandcommunity; and WHEREAS,the PlanhasbeenpreparedincompliancewiththeDisasterMitigation Actof2000;and WHEREAS,the LocalAdvisoryTaskForcecomprisedofrepresentativesfromcity departments, publicserviceagencies,special districts, localfor-profitandnon-profit organizations, andcitizensprovidedoversightoftheplandevelopmentprocess; and WHEREAS,the LocalAdvisoryTaskForcehassoughtbroadpublicparticipation andaffordingcommunitymembersandopportunitytocommentandprovideinput regardingthePlanandtheactionsdefinewithin;and WHEREAS, the CityCounciloftheCityofFontanahasreviewedthePlanand affirmstheCitywillseektoimplementthePlansubjecttoavailablefunding, andmaintain thePlanasrequiredbyrelevantstateandfederalauthorities; and NOW, THEREFORE,be itresolved, determinedandorderedbytheCityCouncilof theCityofFontanadoesherebyadopttheCityofFontanaLocalHazardMitigationPlanin accordancewiththeFederalDisasterMitigationActof2000there-bymeetingtheeligibility requirementsforthepotentialreceiptofhazardmitigationgrantfunds. BEITFURTHERRESOLVED,the FEMAapprovedHazardMitigationPlanis APPROVEDANDADOPTEDthis14dayth ofAugust,2018. READANDAPPROVEDASTOLEGALFORM: CityAttorney Page1of2 DocuSignEnvelopeID:1E7E9D22- 46DB-4DD0-9933-9659C37000AA ResolutionNo.2018- 072 I,Tonia Lewis,City ClerkoftheCityofFontana,California, andEx-OfficioClerkof theCityCouncil,do herebycertifythattheforegoingresolutionistheactualresolutionduly andregularlyadoptedbytheCityCouncilataregularmeetingthereof, heldonthe14dayth ofAugust,2018, by thefollowingvotetowit: AYES:Mayor Warren, MayorProTemRoberts, CouncilMembersTahan,Sandoval, and Armendarez NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CityClerkoftheCityofFontana MayoroftheCityofFontana ATTEST CityClerk Page2of2 CertificateOfCompletion EnvelopeId:1E7E9D2246DB4DD099339659C37000AAStatus: Completed Subject: PleaseDocuSign: Reso2018-072 _LHMP.pdf SourceEnvelope: DocumentPages: 2Signatures: 4EnvelopeOriginator: CertificatePages: 5Initials: 0CityClerk AutoNav: Enabled8353 SierraAvenue EnvelopeIdStamping: EnabledFontana, CA 92335 TimeZone: (UTC-08:00) PacificTime (US &Canada) [email protected] IPAddress:192. 146.186.96 RecordTracking Status:OriginalHolder: CityClerkLocation: DocuSign 8/16/20188:42:04AM [email protected] SignerEventsSignatureTimestamp JeffBallingerSent: 8/16/20188:42:07AM [email protected]: 8/16/20189:00:30AM SecurityLevel: Email, AccountAuthentication Signed: 8/16/20189:00:36AM None) SignatureAdoption: Pre-selectedStyle UsingIPAddress: 107.77.227.126 Signedusingmobile ElectronicRecordandSignatureDisclosure: Accepted: 2/6/20175:14:58PM ID:49bce3bd- df4d-4cff-8659-0af6d478de62 AcquanettaWarrenSent: 8/16/20189:00:37AM [email protected]: 8/16/201810:18:09AM SecurityLevel: Email, AccountAuthentication Signed: 8/16/201810:18:28AM None) SignatureAdoption: Pre-selectedStyle UsingIPAddress: 108.184.104.223 ElectronicRecordandSignatureDisclosure: Accepted: 8/16/201810:18:09AM ID:3389dabb- b7c4-44a9-bc4a-06a2db314c00 ToniLewisSent: 8/16/201810:18:29AM [email protected]: 8/16/20186:29:07PM CityClerkSigned: 8/16/20186:29:17PM CityofFontana SignatureAdoption: Pre-selectedStyle SecurityLevel: Email,Account Authentication None) UsingIPAddress: 76.218.56.24 ElectronicRecordandSignatureDisclosure: NotOfferedviaDocuSign InPersonSignerEventsSignatureTimestamp EditorDeliveryEventsStatusTimestamp AgentDeliveryEventsStatusTimestamp IntermediaryDeliveryEventsStatusTimestamp CertifiedDeliveryEventsStatusTimestamp CarbonCopyEventsStatusTimestamp EvelyneSsenkolotoSent: 8/16/20186:29:18PM [email protected] SecurityLevel: Email,Account Authentication None) ElectronicRecordandSignatureDisclosure: NotOfferedviaDocuSign SusanaGallardoSent: 8/16/20186:29:18PM [email protected] SecurityLevel: Email,Account Authentication None) ElectronicRecordandSignatureDisclosure: NotOfferedviaDocuSign KimberlySolorioSent: 8/16/20186:29:18PM [email protected] SecurityLevel: Email,Account Authentication None) ElectronicRecordandSignatureDisclosure: NotOfferedviaDocuSign KathyKasingerSent: 8/16/20186:29:18PM [email protected]: 8/20/20188:08:16AM SecurityLevel: Email,Account Authentication None) ElectronicRecordandSignatureDisclosure: NotOfferedviaDocuSign NotaryEventsSignatureTimestamp EnvelopeSummaryEventsStatusTimestamps EnvelopeSentHashed/Encrypted8/16/20186:29:18PM CertifiedDeliveredSecurityChecked8/16/20186:29:18PM SigningCompleteSecurity Checked8/16/20186:29:18PM CompletedSecurityChecked8/16/20186:29:18PM PaymentEventsStatusTimestamps ElectronicRecordandSignatureDisclosure CITY OF FONTANA LHMP 2017 1 CITY OF FONTANA LHMP 2017 INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE 2 CITY OF FONTANA LHMP 2017 Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................. 10 1.1 City of Fontana .................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 Purpose of the Plan ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Authority ........................................................................................................................................... 11 1.4 What’s New ....................................................................................................................................... 11 New Hazard Profiles .................................................................................................................. 11 Identifying the Problem ............................................................................................................ 11 Updated Mitigation Strategies .................................................................................................. 11 1.5 Community Profile ............................................................................................................................ 12 Physical Setting New ................................................................................................................. 12 History ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Climate ...................................................................................................................................... 15 Demographics ........................................................................................................................... 16 Existing Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 18 Development Trends ................................................................................................................. 21 Plan Adoption ........................................................................................................... 23 2.1 Adoption by Local Governing Body ................................................................................................... 23 2.2 Promulgation Authority .................................................................................................................... 23 2.3 Primary Point of Contact ................................................................................................................... 23 Planning Process ..................................................................................................... 24 3.1 Preparing for the Plan ....................................................................................................................... 24 Planning Team ........................................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Coordination with Other External Jurisdictions, Agencies, and Organizations ................................ 26 3.3 Public Involvement/Outreach ........................................................................................................... 26 3.4 Assess the Hazard ............................................................................................................................. 27 3.5 Set Goals ........................................................................................................................................... 27 3.6 Review and Propose Mitigation Measures ....................................................................................... 28 3.7 Draft the Hazard Mitigation Plan ...................................................................................................... 30 3.8 Adopt the Plan .................................................................................................................................. 30 Risk Assessment ...................................................................................................... 32 4.1 Hazard Identification......................................................................................................................... 32 3 CITY OF FONTANA LHMP 2017 Hazard Screening Criteria ......................................................................................................... 32 Hazard Assessment Matrix ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Wildfires from Space
    Wildfires from Space More Lessons from the Sky Satellite Educators Association http://SatEd.org This is an adaptation of an original lesson plan developed and published on-line by Natasha Stavros at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The original problem set and all of its related links is available from this address: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/teach/activity/fired-up-over-math-studying-wildfires-from-space/ Please see the Acknowledgements section for historical contributions to the development of this lesson plan. This spotlight on the “Wildfires from Space” lesson plan was published in November 2016 in More Lessons from the Sky, a regular feature of the SEA Newsletter, and archived in the SEA Lesson Plan Library. Both the Newsletter and the Library are freely available on-line from the Satellite Educators Association (SEA) at this address: http://SatEd.org. Content, Internet links, and materials on the lesson plan's online Resources page revised and updated in October 2019. SEA Lesson Plan Library Improvement Program Did you use this lesson plan with students? If so, please share your experience to help us improve the lesson plan for future use. Just click the Feedback link at http://SatEd.org/library/about.htm and complete the short form on-line. Thank you. Teaching Notes Wildfires from Space Invitation Wildfire is a global reality, and with the onset of climate change, the number of yearly wildfires is increasing. The impacts range from the immediate and tangible to the delayed and less obvious. In this activity, students assess wildfires using remote sensing imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • When the Next Fire Comes, Will You Be Ready?
    Carbon Canyon FSC The Carbon Canyon Fire Safe Council’s mission is: Board of Directors to preserve our canyon’s natural and man-made resources on public and private property by development and enforcement Carbon Canyon FSC President: Charlie Blank of ecologically sound and appropriate fire safety measures. P.O. Box 1328 Vice President: Eric Johnson FALL 2019 NEWSLETTER Chino Hills, CA 91709 Secretary-Treasurer: Paul Spitzzeri When the Next Fire Comes, Will You Be Ready? Fire Station Open House The Fire Safe Council Chino Valley Fire District Open House at will be hosting an event on Station 61 (5078 Schaefer Ave., Chino) and the Wildfire Emergency Fire training center (5092 Schaefer Ave., Chino) will Preparedness on Sunday, Schlotterbeck Melanie be hosted on Saturday, October 12th from 9 AM September 8th. It runs from to 2 PM. 2:00 – 4:00 PM at Western 2008 Fire Remembered Hills Golf Course at 1800 Canyon residents came to the Chino Hills • Meet your local firefighters Carbon Canyon Road in State Park Discovery Center to remember and reflect • Tour the fire station and training facility Chino Hills. Let’s remember on the devastation of the Freeway Complex Fire. They • See the fire engines that respond to together and learn from were joined by hosts including Hills For Everyone, emergencies each other all that we each Carbon Canyon Fire Safe Council, Chino Valley • Watch live demonstrations can do to prepare for the Independent Fire District, Brea Fire, and the Chino • Learn valuable safety tips Ed Schumann next fire. Hills State Park Interpretive Association. Photo poster There will be boards, photo albums, fire preparedness materials presentations, starting at 2, on preparing your house and videos were on display.
    [Show full text]
  • Department Emergency Operations Plan (DEOP)
    San Bernardino County PROBATION DEPARTMENT Department Emergency Operations Plan (DEOP) October 2020 San Bernardino County SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Probation Department Emergency Operations Plan Department (DEOP) THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK San Bernardino County SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Probation Department Emergency Operations Plan Department (DEOP) RECORD OF CHANGES On an annual basis, the County Departments/Agencies shall review their respective DEOP and/or update Department/Agency Functional Annexes as appropriate. Document the date of the review and the names of personnel conducting the review. Change Section Change Revised By Description of Change # Date 1 10/3/18 Carrie Cruz ICEMA response Part I - Basic 2 6/26/19 Carrie Cruz Added Sec. 4.2 – DEOP Implementation Language Plan, Sec. 4 Part I - Basic Added Sec. 4.2.1 – Decision Matrix for DEOP 3 6/26/19 Carrie Cruz Plan, Sec. 4 Implementation Part II – 4 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Revised Sec. Title and Additional Language Annex 2 Part II – Added Sec. 2.1.1 – MEF Initial Screening Aid and 5 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Annex 2 Language Part II – Added Standardized MEF Chart for all County 6 Annex 2, 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Department/Agencies and Language Sec. 2.1.1 Table of 7 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Updated TOC Contents Part II – 8 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 1 Annex 1 Part II – 9 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 2 Annex 2 Part II – 10 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 3 Annex 3 Part II – 11 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 4 Annex 4 Part II – 12 7/1/19 Carrie
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration Date: January 9, 2019 Case No.: 2016-006868ENV Project Title: SFPUC Reliable Power Project Project Location: Portions of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Rights of Way in Stanislaus, Mariposa, and Tuolumne Counties Zoning: Various Project Sponsor San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Antonia Sivyer (415) 554-2474 Lead Agency: San Francisco Planning Department Staff Contact: Timothy Johnston – (415) 575-9035 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) proposes to implement the Reliable Power Project (proposed project) for maintaining the reliability of the SFPUC’s electrical transmission system between the Holm and Kirkwood Powerhouses and the Warnerville Substation. The project includes implementation of a long-term vegetation management program that would address the North American Electric Reliability Corporation’s reliability standard (FAC-003) and other regulatory requirements that seek to minimize the risk of power outages and fires from vegetation contact with transmission lines on or near the right of way for electrical transmission lines1. In addition to implementation of the vegetation management program, the proposed project would include repairs and replacements for culverts associated with transmission line access roads and construction of a sand storage shed to stockpile sand for winter road treatments needed for access during winter months. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would occur within existing SFPUC facility and right of way boundaries in Stanislaus County, Mariposa County, and Tuolumne County, and would not require the acquisition of new property. Project implementation involving vegetation management would be ongoing. Construction activities and duration for culvert repair and/or replacement would vary along the transmission corridor, but would be short-term in nature, generally requiring a few of days to a couple of weeks to complete.
    [Show full text]
  • In the QUEUE Before a Difficult Conversation, Take the Other
    Latinpost.com Murrieta Fire Department Weekly Newsletter www.MurrietaCA.gov/fire www.MurrietaCA.gov/fireplans Re-deployed from the Sand to the Fire Soberanes fire out near Big Sur INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Highlights 1 Career Development 1 In the Queue 1 Training 2 EMS 2 Equipment/Facilities 3 Safety/Health 3 Prevention 3 Hot Shots 4 The Riverside County Fire Chiefs Association Steele Steps Up 4 has worked closely with My Safe: California to Fleet 5 produce its first multi-agency public service The Numbers 5 announcement. This edition focuses on Hearst Castle: It looks like the accommodations wildfire-urban interface. Link: HERE at these wildland fires are improving! Ackerman, Cicconi, Brann, and Rexroad assigned to the Chimney Fire. More: HERE Live Updates of California wildfires courtesy of L.A. Now Los Angeles Times - HERE Day #1 - Murrieta Fire Citizen’s Fire Academy EXTRAS In the QUEUE Before a Difficult Conversation, Principles of Modern Fire Take the Other Person’s Perspective Attack: Aug 25 Harvard Business Review – Amy Gallo Aug 19 2016 Free Webinar: How Clean is When you need to talk through a difficult issue with a coworker, Clean? PPE. Aug 30 it’s tempting to just get it over with. But don’t start the HP Open Enrollment: Aug 24 conversation until you’ve taken the time to see the situation from their perspective. Try to get a sense of what your Council Goals: Aug 26 colleague might be thinking. They have a rationale for the way they’ve been behaving, so what might that reason be? Imagine you’re in their shoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
    INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 San Bernardino County Unincorporated Area ................................................................ 2 San Bernardino County Fire Protection District ..................................................... 3 San Bernardino County Flood Control District ....................................................... 4 Special Districts Department ................................................................................. 6 1.2 Purpose of the Plan ...................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Authority ....................................................................................................................... 12 1.4 What’s New .................................................................................................................. 12 Updates to the Current Plan ............................................................................... 13 New Jurisdictional Annexes ................................................................................. 13 New Risk Assessment ......................................................................................... 14 Successful Wildfire Mitigation Implementation .................................................... 15 Flood Hazard Mitigation Success ........................................................................ 18 Geologic
    [Show full text]
  • Adapt to More Wildfire in Western North American Forests As Climate
    PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forestsasclimatechanges Tania Schoennagela,1, Jennifer K. Balcha,b, Hannah Brenkert-Smithc, Philip E. Dennisond, Brian J. Harveye, Meg A. Krawchukf, Nathan Mietkiewiczb, Penelope Morgang, Max A. Moritzh, Ray Raskeri, Monica G. Turnerj, and Cathy Whitlockk,l Edited by F. Stuart Chapin III, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK, and approved February 24, 2017 (received for review October 25, 2016) Wildfires across western North America have increased in number and size over the past three decades, and this trend will continue in response to further warming. As a consequence, the wildland–urban in- terface is projected to experience substantially higher risk of climate-driven fires in the coming decades. Although many plants, animals, and ecosystem services benefit from fire, it is unknown how ecosystems will respond to increased burning and warming. Policy and management have focused primarily on spec- ified resilience approaches aimed at resistance to wildfire and restoration of areas burned by wildfire through fire suppression and fuels management. These strategies are inadequate to address a new era of western wildfires. In contrast, policies that promote adaptive resilience to wildfire, by which people and ecosystems adjust and reorganize in response to changing fire regimes to reduce future vulnerability, are needed. Key aspects of an adaptive resilience approach are (i) recognizing that fuels reduction cannot alter regional wildfire trends; (ii) targeting fuels reduction to increase adaptation by some ecosystems and residential communities to more frequent fire; (iii) actively managing more wild and prescribed fires with a range of severities; and (iv) incentivizing and planning residential development to withstand inevitable wildfire.
    [Show full text]
  • News Headlines 11/9/2016
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ News Headlines 11/9/2016 Measure A: Town voters say yes to fire tax - overwhelmingly Family of 6 displaced in San Bernardino apartment fire Firefighters Rescue Man Pinned Under SUV These 13 states have the most homes at risk from wildfires 2016 Wildfire Season Not Likely to Top Record-Setting 2015 Season 1 Measure A: Town voters say yes to fire tax - overwhelmingly Matthew Cabe, Daily Press Posted: November 8, 2016, 12:01 AM APPLE VALLEY — Voters are saying yes to the tax measure designed to bolster emergency services in the town, according to unofficial election results posted at 10 p.m. Tuesday. With more than 34 percent of precincts reporting, Measure A has received overwhelming approval, amassing 10,364 votes, which translates to 77 percent of the vote, according to the San Bernardino County Elections Office. Measure A needed a two-thirds majority to pass. Doug Qualls — former Apple Valley Fire Protection District Chief and Measure A’s principal officer — told the Daily Press things are “going well” in the district as a result of the voting. “The threshold of reaching two-thirds of the voters is an extraordinary effort,” Qualls said. “To get two-thirds of the people to agree on something, and we far exceeded that expectation, that’s by commitment to the community.” Qualls called Tuesday’s outcome the result of a reality wherein fire stations need to be reopened; currently just three of the district’s seven fire stations are opened, and emergency-response times are below the national averages. “In 1997,” Qualls said, “the fire district promised the voters that they would deliver the best service they can deliver with the resources provided.
    [Show full text]
  • The Costs and Losses of Wildfires a Literature Review
    NIST Special Publication 1215 The Costs and Losses of Wildfires A Literature Review Douglas Thomas David Butry Stanley Gilbert David Webb Juan Fung This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1215 NIST Special Publication 1215 The Costs and Losses of Wildfires A Literature Survey Douglas Thomas David Butry Stanley Gilbert David Webb Juan Fung Applied Economics Office Engineering Laboratory This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1215 November 2017 U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Walter Copan, NIST Director and Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Photo Credit: Lake City, Fla., May 15, 2007 -- The Florida Bugaboo Fire still rages out of control in some locations. FEMA Photo by Mark Wolfe - May 14, 2007 - Location: Lake City, FL: https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/images/51316 National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 1215 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 1215, 72 pages (October 2017) CODEN: NSPUE2 This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1215 Abstract This report enumerates all possible costs of wildfire management and wildfire-related losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 9-11 Wildfire Tech Reports
    APPENDIX 9.11 WILDFIRE TECHNICAL REPORTS ACCEPTED DRAFT Murrieta Hills FIRE PROTECTION TECHNICAL REPORT Plan No. SP 012-3164, TTM 35853 Prepared for: Murrieta Fire and Rescue 41825 Juniper Street Murrieta, California 92562 Contact: Scott Ferguson, Fire Chief On behalf of Applicant: Benchmark Pacific 550 Laguna Drive, Suite B Carlsbad, California 92008 Contact: Richard Robotta, Vice President Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Michael Huff, Principal AUGUST 2019 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Murrieta Hills Fire Protection Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... V ES.1 Findings for Maximum Dead-End Road Length .................................................. vii 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Intent ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Applicable Codes/Existing Regulations ................................................................. 2 1.3 Proposed Project Summary ..................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Location ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Current Site and Vicinity Land Use ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Responses to Comments
    Responses to Comments Final Environmental Impact Report page 23 4. Responses to Comments A. Topical Responses Topical Response 1 – Fire Hazard This response is provided to address topical issues that were identified several times within the comment letters on the DEIR. Reference to this Topical Response is noted in response individual comment letters on this topic. Seven fires have burned within one mile of the Project site over the historic fire data record as shown on Exhibit 5-65 - Fire History Map on page 5-284 of the DEIR. The average interval between wildfires in the area was calculated to be 5.5 years with intervals ranging between 0 years (multiple fires in the same year) and 12 years. As shown below, the interval between fires on the Project site has been much greater with a 28-year interval between the Owl Fire and the Freeway Complex Fire. Historical records show that three wildfires have burned within the Project site since the beginning of the historical fire data record: • Santa Ana Canyon Fire in 1943 • Owl Fire in 1980 • Freeway Complex Fire in 2008 The Fire Protection and Emergency Evacuation Plan (FPEP) prepared by Dudek (June 2013) was used to assess the existing condition and the historical fire data, and to provide recommendations for minimizing the risks associated with potential future fire events. The FPEP is included in the DEIR as Appendix J and is analyzed in DEIR Section 5.7 (Hazards and Hazardous Materials). The preparers of the FPEP reviewed numerous information sources during the analysis phase of the document’s preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Declarations in California
    Disaster Declarations in California (BOLD=Major Disaster) (Wildfires are Highlighted) 2018 DR-4353 Wildfires, Flooding, Mudflows, And Debris Flows Declared on Tuesday, January 2, 2018 - 06:00 FM-5244 Pawnee Fire Declared on Sunday, June 24, 2018 - 07:11 FM-5245 Creek Fire Declared on Monday, June 25, 2018 - 07:11 2017 DR-4301 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 13:15 EM-3381 Potential Failure of the Emergency Spillway at Lake Oroville Dam Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:20 DR-4302 Severe Winter Storm Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:30 DR-4305 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 04:48 DR-4308 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, Mudslides Declared on Saturday, April 1, 2017 - 16:55 DR-4312 Flooding Declared on Tuesday, May 2, 2017 - 14:00 FM-5189 Wall Fire Declared on Sunday, July 9, 2017 - 14:18 FM-5192 Detwiler Fire Declared on Monday, July 17, 2017 - 19:23 DR-4344 Wildfires Declared on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 - 08:40 2016 FM-5124 Old Fire Declared on Saturday, June 4, 2016 - 21:55 FM-5128 Border 3 Fire Declared on Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 19:03 FM-5129 Fish Fire Declared on Monday, June 20, 2016 - 20:35 FM-5131 Erskine Fire Declared on Thursday, June 23, 2016 - 20:57 FM-5132 Sage Fire Declared on Saturday, July 9, 2016 - 18:15 FM-5135 Sand Fire Declared on Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 17:34 FM-5137 Soberanes Fire Declared on Thursday, July 28, 2016 - 16:38 FM-5140 Goose Fire Declared on Saturday, July 30, 2016 - 20:48
    [Show full text]