Workplace Privacy Policies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Workplace Privacy Policies NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW INSTITUTE 28th Annual Public Sector EEO and Employment Law Conference August 28, 2009 – San Francisco, CA Workplace Privacy Policies Robert D. Brownstone, Esq.* _________________________________________________________________________ *Robert D. Brownstone is the Law & Technology Director at Fenwick & West LLP. He advises clients on electronic discovery, information-security, electronic information management and retention/destruction policies and protocols. Mr. Brownstone also collaborates with clients as to computer solutions enabling compliance with legal obligations. A nationwide advisor, speaker and writer on many law and technology issues, he is frequently quoted in the press as an expert on electronic information. He also teaches Electronic Discovery classes at the University of San Francisco School (USF) of Law and Santa Clara University School of Law. Mr. Brownstone is a member of: four state bars; the NELI Advisory Board; and the executive committee of the State Bar of California’s Law Practice Management and Technology (LPMT) Section. Before joining Fenwick & West in 2000, Mr. Brownstone had a varied 13-year career as a litigator, law school administrator, law school teacher and consultant. He received his J.D. magna cum laude from Brooklyn Law School in 1986 and his B.A. from Swarthmore College in 1982. THESE MATERIALS ARE MEANT TO ASSIST IN A GENERAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE CURRENT LAW RELATING TO PRIVACY AND ELECTRONIC INFORMATION MANAGEMENT. THEY ARE NOT TO BE REGARDED AS LEGAL ADVICE. ORGANIZATIONS OR INDIVIDUALS WITH PARTICULAR QUESTIONS SHOULD SEEK ADVICE OF COUNSEL. © 2009 Fenwick & West LLP Robert D. Brownstone advises clients on electronic discovery, on electronic information management and on retention/destruction policies and protocols. He also collaborates with clients on computer solutions enabling compliance with legal duties <www.fenwick.com/services/2.23.0.asp?s=1055>. A nationwide speaker and writer on many law and technology issues <www.fenwick.com/attorneys/4.2.1.asp?aid=544#publications>, Mr. Brownstone is frequently quoted in the press as an expert on electronic information <www.fenwick.com/attorneys/4.2.1.asp?aid=544#Featured>. He also teaches Electronic Discovery classes at the University of San Francisco School (USF) of Law and Santa Clara University School of Law. Mr. Brownstone is a member of: four state bars (including California and New York); the Information Systems Auditing and Control Association (ISACA) and the Association of Records Managers and Administrators (ARMA). Mr. Robert D. Brownstone Brownstone is also the Vice-Chair-Elect of the executive committee of the State Law & Technology Director Bar of California’s Law Practice Management and Technology (LPMT) Section. <www.fenwick.com/attorneys/ 4.2.1.asp?aid=544> In 2007, he was named to the National Employment Law Institute (NELI) Advisory Board. In 2006, Mr. Brownstone was named a Northern California Phone: 650.335.7912 Super Lawyer and featured in a cover story of ABA’s Law Practice Magazine. Fax: 650.938.5200 <www.fenwick.com/pressroom/5.1.1.asp?mid=329&loc=FN>. E-mail: rbrownstone@fenwick.com Before joining Fenwick & West in 2000, he had a varied 13-year career as a Emphases: litigator, law school administrator, law school teacher and consultant. Records Retention/Destruction From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Brownstone was the Moot Court Program Coordinator Electronic Discovery at the USF School of Law. During the 1997-98 school year, he also acted as Electronic Information Management Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Director of Legal Research & Writing Compliance at JFKU School of Law in Walnut Creek, California. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. Privacy and Information Security Brownstone taught Legal Research Writing & Analysis at USF Law. Between 1990 and 1995, Mr. Brownstone had key roles in some publicized Representative Clients: cases. From 1986 to 1990, when Mr. Brownstone practiced in New York, he Capcom Entertainment, Inc. was on plaintiffs' counsel's team in the civil suit against Claus von Bulow and Daimler Chrysler Corporation on Lowell Milken's defense team in multiple Drexel Burnham Lambert matters. Equinix, Inc. Interwoven In 1986, Mr. Brownstone received his J.D., magna cum laude, from Brooklyn Omidyar Network Law School, where he was a Notes Editor and a published author on the Opsware Inc. Brooklyn Law Review. In 1982, Mr. Brownstone received his B.A. in English literature and political science from Swarthmore College. Port of Oakland Proofpoint, Inc. Xilinx, Inc. Workplace Privacy Policies Materials – TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PAPER TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... i Body of Paper ...................................................................................................................... 1 APPENDICES App. A – SLIDES ................................................................................................................ A-1 App. B – “E-MAIL’S NINE LIVES”..................................................................................... B-1 App. C – SAMPLE SUMMARY MEMO RE: TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTABLE USE (AND LACK-OF-EMPLOYEE-PRIVACY) POLICY........................................... C-1 App. D – SAMPLES – GENERIC POLICIES....................................................................... D-1 SAMPLE TECHNOLOGY USE AND LACK-OF-PRIVACY POLICY 1 .................. D-1 SAMPLE TECHNOLOGY USE AND LACK-OF-PRIVACY POLICY 2 .................. D-6 SAMPLE ELECTRONIC MAIL POLICY ................................................................ D-10 SAMPLE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT .................................................... D-14 SAMPLE BLOGGING POLICY.............................................................................. D-15 SAMPLE FCRA DISCLOSURE FOR ADVERSE ACTION BASED ON NON-FACT ACT INVESTIGATIONS ................................................. D-17 App. E – BIBLIOGRAPHY # 1 – ELEC. INFO. MGMT. (EIM) RESOURCES ...............E-1 App. F – BIBLIOGRAPHY # 2 – COMPLIANCE RESOURCES (some) – R. Brownstone and Kevin Moore (Fenwick & West LLP) ................................F-1 App. G – BIBLIOGRAPHY # 3 – COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY TERMINOLOGY – Online Glossaries Links List..............................................................................G-1 App. H – BIBLIOGRAPHY # 4 – DETROIT TEXT-MESSAGING SCANDAL – Additional Articles..............................................................................................H-1 i PAPER TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page I. INTRODUCTION – THE MODERN LANDSCAPE ..........................................................1 A. Physical Conduct PLUS Digital Activity...........................................................1 B. Strange Things People Memorialize – Overview of Liability Risks ...............4 1. Employees’ Damaging Emails...............................................................4 2. Employees’ Damaging Internet Use and Postings ..............................7 a. Internet Activity...........................................................................7 b. Posts on Chatrooms, Blogs, Wikis, Social Networking Sites, Twitter, etc ........................................8 (i) Company Confidential and Trade Secret Information ....................................................................10 (ii) Harassment....................................................................12 (iii) Discrimination ...............................................................13 (iv) Concerted Activity........................................................13 c. Damaging Metadata and Embedded Data ..............................14 3. Prospective Employees’ (Applicants’) Internet Activity ...................16 II. MONITORING OF EMPLOYEES’ ELECTRONIC ACTIVITIES ....................................16 A. Introduction ......................................................................................................16 B. Legality – Some Justifications and Some Countervailing Concerns ..........17 1. Federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act (Wiretap And Stored Communications Act) ..............................................................17 a. Wiretap Act as Applied to E-Mails in Transit..........................19 (i) Majority View – Interception Must be Contemporaneous with Transmission........................19 (ii) Newer Minority View – Interception need NOT be Contemporaneous with Transmission...................20 b. Stored Communications Act as Shield and Sword ...............22 (i) Shield: Employer Access to Stored E-mails, “Private” Web-Based E-mail Systems, Pagers and Employee Web Sites.................................................................22 (ii) Sword: Affirmative Claim Based on Snooping by Former Employee...............................................27 2. State Analogues to the ECPA..............................................................29 i PAPER TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 3. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”).........................................30 4. Countervailing Concern # 1 – Protected Union Activity Under the National Labor Relations Act, et al. (“NLRA”) .............................38 5. Countervailing Concern # 2 – Avoiding Invasion of Privacy Claims....................................................................................................41 III. INVESTIGATIONS AND BACKGROUND CHECKS.....................................................44 A. Credit Report Information Under FCRA/FACTA and
Recommended publications
  • 6515291581.Pdf
    ,. I. Federal Communications Commissiob OA-03-3648 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washinglon, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Section 73 622(b), ) MM Docket No. 00-233 Table of Allotments, ) RM-9996 Digital Television Broadcast Stations. ) (Fort Walton Beach, Florida) ) REPORT AND ORDER (Proceeding Terminated) Adopted: November 13, 2003 Released: November 19, 2003 By the Chief, Video Services Division. 1 At the request of Television Fit-For-Life, Inc. ("WFGX"), licensee of station WFGX(TV), NTSC channel 35, Fort Walton Beach, Florida, the Commission has before it the Nqice of Proposed Rule Making, 15 FCC Rcd 22365 (2000). proposing the substitution of DTV channel 50 for station WFGX(TV)'s assigned DTV channel 25. Rainbow 58 Broadcasting, Inc. ("Rainbow"), licensee of WAWD(TV), Channel 58, and permittee of WAWD-DT, channel 49, both licensed to service the community of Fort Walton Beach, Florida, filed comments in opposition to WFGX's proposal. WFGX filed reply comments. 2. Rainbow filed comments stating that its engineering analysis indicates that the techiiical study submitted by WFGX used the wrong methodology in conducting the interference studies prescribed in OET Bulletin 69. Rainbow states that WFGX's interference studies were based upon the NTSC Grade B (65 6 dBu) contour instead of noise limited (42.9 dBu) contour of WAWD(TV). Consequently, Rainbow claims that WFGX's DTV operation on channel 50 will generate new interference to 6.3% of the benchmark DTV service value (6671 persons) for the allotment of the WAWD-DT's protected service contours. Rainbow clams that this amount of interference would facially violate the 2%/10% de minimis criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Affiliate Market Timeframe of Move Call
    TV Broadcasters’ Impact on Alabama Impact on AL 01 Broadcasters have an impact of $14.16 billion annually on Alabama’s economy. 31,130 Jobs 34 Commercial TV Stations Call Channel Affiliate Market Timeframe of Move WAWD 58 Independent Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL (60) Phase 7: Oct 19, 2019 - Jan 17, 2020 WEIQ 42 Public Television Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL (60) Phase 7: Oct 19, 2019 - Jan 17, 2020 WFBD 0 Independent Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL (60) Phase 7: Oct 19, 2019 - Jan 17, 2020 WFGX 35 My Network TV Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL (60) Phase 7: Oct 19, 2019 - Jan 17, 2020 WFNA 55 CW Television Network Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL (60) Phase 5: Aug 3, 2019 - Sept 6, 2019 WJTC 44 Independent Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL (60) Phase 7: Oct 19, 2019 - Jan 17, 2020 WKRG-TV 5 CBS Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL (60) Phase 5: Aug 3, 2019 - Sept 6, 2019 WMPV-TV 21 Trinity Broadcasting Network Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL (60) Phase 5: Aug 3, 2019 - Sept 6, 2019 WPAN 53 Independent Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL (60) Phase 7: Oct 19, 2019 - Jan 17, 2020 WSRE 23 Public Television Mobile, AL-Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL (60) Phase 7: Oct 19, 2019 - Jan 17, 2020 WAKA 8 CBS Montgomery (Selma), AL (123) Phase 5: Aug 3, 2019 - Sept 6, 2019 WBIH 29 Independent Montgomery (Selma), AL (123) Phase 5: Aug 3, 2019 - Sept 6, 2019 WBMM 22 CW Television Network Montgomery (Selma), AL (123) Phase 5: Aug 3, 2019 - Sept 6, 2019
    [Show full text]
  • Untangling the World Wide Weblog: a Proposal for Blogging, Employment-At-Will, and Lifestyle Discrimination Statutes
    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 42 Number 1 Fall 2007 pp.245-290 Fall 2007 Untangling the World Wide Weblog: A Proposal for Blogging, Employment-at-Will, and Lifestyle Discrimination Statutes Shelbie J. Byers Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Shelbie J. Byers, Untangling the World Wide Weblog: A Proposal for Blogging, Employment-at-Will, and Lifestyle Discrimination Statutes , 42 Val. U. L. Rev. 245 (2007). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol42/iss1/8 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at scholar@valpo.edu. Byers: Untangling the World Wide Weblog: A Proposal for Blogging, Employ UNTANGLING THE WORLD WIDE WEBLOG: A PROPOSAL FOR BLOGGING, EMPLOYMENT-AT-WILL, AND LIFESTYLE DISCRIMINATION STATUTES I. INTRODUCTION Laws are like spider’s webs: if some poor weak creature come[s] up against them, it is caught; but a bigger one can break through and get away.1 Imagine landing your dream job. All of your hard work and education has finally paid off. You accept the job offer, give two weeks’ notice at your current place of employment, and move to another state to start your dream job. Being far from home, and wanting to keep in touch with family and friends scattered around the country, you start up a blog.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 103/Thursday, May 28, 2020
    32256 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS closes-headquarters-open-window-and- presentation of data or arguments COMMISSION changes-hand-delivery-policy. already reflected in the presenter’s 7. During the time the Commission’s written comments, memoranda, or other 47 CFR Part 1 building is closed to the general public filings in the proceeding, the presenter [MD Docket Nos. 19–105; MD Docket Nos. and until further notice, if more than may provide citations to such data or 20–105; FCC 20–64; FRS 16780] one docket or rulemaking number arguments in his or her prior comments, appears in the caption of a proceeding, memoranda, or other filings (specifying Assessment and Collection of paper filers need not submit two the relevant page and/or paragraph Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2020. additional copies for each additional numbers where such data or arguments docket or rulemaking number; an can be found) in lieu of summarizing AGENCY: Federal Communications original and one copy are sufficient. them in the memorandum. Documents Commission. For detailed instructions for shown or given to Commission staff ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. submitting comments and additional during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal information on the rulemaking process, must be filed consistent with section Communications Commission see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 1.1206(b) of the Commission’s rules. In (Commission) seeks comment on several section of this document. proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) proposals that will impact FY 2020 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of the Commission’s rules or for which regulatory fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Privacy to Prevent Discrimination
    William & Mary Law Review Volume 56 (2014-2015) Issue 6 Article 4 5-18-2015 Protecting Privacy to Prevent Discrimination Jessica L. Roberts Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Repository Citation Jessica L. Roberts, Protecting Privacy to Prevent Discrimination, 56 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2097 (2015), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol56/iss6/4 Copyright c 2015 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr PROTECTING PRIVACY TO PREVENT DISCRIMINATION JESSICA L. ROBERTS* ABSTRACT A person cannot consider information that she does not have. Unlawful discrimination, therefore, frequently requires discrimina- tors to have knowledge about protected status. This Article exploits that simple reality, arguing that protecting privacy can prevent discrimination by restricting access to the very information discrimi- nators use to discriminate. Although information related to many antidiscrimination categories, like race and sex, may be immediately apparent upon meeting a person, privacy law can still do significant work to prevent discrimination on the basis of less visible traits such as genetic information, age, national origin, ethnicity, and religion, as well as in cases of racial or gender ambiguity. To that end, this Article explores the advantages and disadvantages of enacting privacy protections to thwart discrimination. It concludes that the weaknesses endemic to privacy law might be addressed by adopting an explicit antidiscrimination purpose. Hence, just as privacy law may further antidiscrimination, so may antidiscrimination enhance privacy law.
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Privacy Laws: North Carolina
    View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/w-000-3324 Employee Privacy Laws: North Carolina ALICIA A. GILLESKIE AND KIMBERLY J. KORANDO, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, L.L.P., WITH PRACTICAL LAW LABOR & EMPLOYMENT A guide to state law on employee privacy laws Does not adversely affect: for private employers in North Carolina. This the employee's job performance: the employee's ability to properly fulfill the responsibilities of Q&A addresses employee privacy rights and the position in question; or the consequences for employers that violate the safety of other employees. these rights. Federal, local or municipal law may (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 95-28.2(b).) impose additional or different requirements. Employers do not violate this law if they: OVERVIEW OF STATE PRIVACY LAW Restrict the lawful use of lawful products by employees during nonworking hours if the restriction relates to a bona fide occupa- 1. Please list each state law relating to employee privacy (for tional requirement and is reasonably related to the employment example, employee right to privacy, access to personnel files, activities. If the restriction reasonably relates to only a particular electronic communications, surveillance and monitoring, medi- employee or group of employees, then the restriction may only cal examinations, and lawful off-duty activity laws), EXCEPT lawfully apply to them. state laws on background checks and drug testing. For each, Restrict the lawful use of lawful products by employees during please describe: nonworking hours if the restriction relates to the fundamental objectives of the organization. What activity the law protects. Discharges, disciplines, or takes any action against an employee Which employers are covered.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOULD EMPLOYERS HAVE the ABILITY to MONITOR THEIR EMPLOYEES ELECTRONICALLY? Danielle Dorval University of Rhode Island
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Seminar Research Paper Series Schmidt Labor Research Center 2004 Should Employers Have the Ability to Monitor Their mploE yees Electronically? Danielle Dorval University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/lrc_paper_series Recommended Citation Dorval, Danielle, "Should Employers Have the Ability to Monitor Their mpE loyees Electronically?" (2004). Seminar Research Paper Series. Paper 18. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/lrc_paper_series/18http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/lrc_paper_series/18 This Seminar Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Schmidt Labor Research Center at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seminar Research Paper Series by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact digitalcommons@etal.uri.edu. SHOULD EMPLOYERS HAVE THE ABILITY TO MONITOR THEIR EMPLOYEES ELECTRONICALLY? Danielle Dorval University of Rhode Island The purpose of this paper is to answer the question of whether or not employers should have the ability to electronically monitor their employees in the workplace. It stresses both the monitoring of computers, and also telephone wiretapping. The topic is examined through a legal, behavioral, and ethical perspective, to gain a more complete idea of the extent of the concern with electronic monitoring. Court cases were used to explain the different facets of the legal struggle between the employer's right to monitor and the employee's right to privacy. Several theories, including panoptic theory, were used to explain the behavioral effects of employer surveillance. Finally, the ethical issues with regards to electronic monitoring were explained through the idea of social control, and the balance of the needs of the employer and the needs of the employee.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRUSIVE MONITORING: EMPLOYEE PRIVACY EXPECTATIONS ARE REASONABLE in EUROPE, DESTROYED in the UNITED STATES Lothar Determannt & Robert Spragueu
    INTRUSIVE MONITORING: EMPLOYEE PRIVACY EXPECTATIONS ARE REASONABLE IN EUROPE, DESTROYED IN THE UNITED STATES Lothar Determannt & Robert SpragueU TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................. ...................... 980 II. EMPLOYER MONITORING AND EMPLOYEE PRIVACY-U.S. PERSPECTIVE ............................ 981 A. WORK-RELATED EMPLOYER MONITORING........................................981 B. WORK-RELATED EMPLOYEE PRIVACY ................ ....... 986 1. Work-Related Rights to Privag Under the Constitution.....................986 2. Work-Related Rights to Privag Under the Common Law..................990 3. Statutog Rjghts to Privag................................. 993 a) The Electronic Communications Privacy Act ............... 995 C. INTRUSIVE WORKPLACE MONITORING AND EMPLOYEE PRIVACY................................................ 1001 1. Employer Access to PersonalWeb-Based Applications..................... 1007 2. Webcams ...................................... 1009 3. GPS ..................................... 1012 D. WORKPLACE PRIVACY TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES............... 1016 III. EMPLOYER MONITORING AND EMPLOYEE PRIVACY-EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE .. ................... 1018 A. LAWS IN EUROPE-OVERVIEW ................ ............. 1019 B. CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTIONS FOR PRIVACY AT THE EUROPEAN LEVEL............................. .......... 1019 ( 2011 Lothar Determann & Robert Sprague. t Dr. iur habil, Privatdozent, Freie Universitat Berlin; Adjunct Professor, University of California, Berkeley School of Law and Hastings College
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-19-67A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Re
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 19-67 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Children’s Television Programming Rules ) MB Docket No. 18-202 ) Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative ) MB Docket No. 17-105 REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: July 10, 2019 Released: July 12, 2019 Comment Date: (30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) Reply Comment Date: (60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioners O’Rielly and Carr issuing separate statements; Commissioners Rosenworcel and Starks dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................................3 III. DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................................10 A. Statutory Authority .........................................................................................................................10 B. The Current State of the Marketplace for Children’s Programming ..............................................11 C. Core Programming..........................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Consent in the Workplace
    Physical Consent In The Workplace Is Phineas fitchy or satiated after shaggiest Osbourn premiers so motionlessly? Kit refloats skulkingly if reprovingreadier Mahmoud air-mail orrolls de-Stalinizing or traipsed. the,Upstaged is Kimball and humiliatory?inexhaustible Johnathan checks her bonehead Be willing to negotiate, upon request, with fidelity union representing your employees on future terms and conditions of using such new technologies. Assault and battery are two separate claims that employees can bring against their employer. Religious need not have sex, i need not only some states experience in disciplinary committee on consent in physical workplace. Initiatives in an analysis on whether or he should respect for physiotherapy, continued consent for literature on your clothes. All i this cleanse to creating a robust platform for future female workers to report harassment incidents. You consent is physical contact by letting your twitter feed is relevant factors. We underline a proud bird of providing compassionate advocacy for victims of workplace harassment, and dedicate ourselves to stopping the harassment and seeking full compensation for our clients. This might occur in pledge or suppose an administrative agency, sometimes according to complicated legal procedures. Avoid italics; they score not advance easily online. These words or effective? In some cases it is better to bend at the gesture, while others it barely better also quit. The javascript used in this widget is not supported by your browser. Ceo would allow or physical harm, brushing the perspective in. Those interested in using one need to carefully explore the various products on the market to determine which is best for their situation.
    [Show full text]
  • All Full-Power Television Stations by Dma, Indicating Those Terminating Analog Service Before Or on February 17, 2009
    ALL FULL-POWER TELEVISION STATIONS BY DMA, INDICATING THOSE TERMINATING ANALOG SERVICE BEFORE OR ON FEBRUARY 17, 2009. (As of 2/20/09) NITE HARD NITE LITE SHIP PRE ON DMA CITY ST NETWORK CALLSIGN LITE PLUS WVR 2/17 2/17 LICENSEE ABILENE-SWEETWATER ABILENE TX NBC KRBC-TV MISSION BROADCASTING, INC. ABILENE-SWEETWATER ABILENE TX CBS KTAB-TV NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC. ABILENE-SWEETWATER ABILENE TX FOX KXVA X SAGE BROADCASTING CORPORATION ABILENE-SWEETWATER SNYDER TX N/A KPCB X PRIME TIME CHRISTIAN BROADCASTING, INC ABILENE-SWEETWATER SWEETWATER TX ABC/CW (DIGITALKTXS-TV ONLY) BLUESTONE LICENSE HOLDINGS INC. ALBANY ALBANY GA NBC WALB WALB LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC ALBANY ALBANY GA FOX WFXL BARRINGTON ALBANY LICENSE LLC ALBANY CORDELE GA IND WSST-TV SUNBELT-SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD ALBANY DAWSON GA PBS WACS-TV X GEORGIA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ALBANY PELHAM GA PBS WABW-TV X GEORGIA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ALBANY VALDOSTA GA CBS WSWG X GRAY TELEVISION LICENSEE, LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ADAMS MA ABC WCDC-TV YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY NBC WNYT WNYT-TV, LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY ABC WTEN YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY FOX WXXA-TV NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY AMSTERDAM NY N/A WYPX PAXSON ALBANY LICENSE, INC. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY PITTSFIELD MA MYTV WNYA VENTURE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CW WCWN FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY PBS WMHT WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CBS WRGB FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Bites Back
    Social Media Bites Back Speaker . Sue Dill Calloway RN, Esq. CPHRM, CCMSCP . AD, BA, BSN, MSN, JD . President of Patient Safety and Education . 5447 Fawnbrook Lane . Dublin, Ohio 43017 . 614 791-1468 (Call with Questions, No emails) . sdill1@columbus.rr.com 2 What is Social Media? . Social media is defined as: . Websites and applications that enable users to create and share content with or to participants in social networking . It is computer mediated tools that allow people to create, share, and exchange information, ideas, and pictures in virtual communities and networks . Internet users spend more time on social media than any other type (Nielsen) . Social media takes on all different forms; blogs, photo sharing, enterprise social media, social gaming, video sharing, social booking and more 3 Social Media Websites . Facebook-commonly used for friends to stay in touch . Pinterest-web and mobile application company that has photo sharing website . Twitter-users post “tweets” of up to 140 words that answer “what are you doing right now” . You Tube-can share videos with friends and others . MySpace-commonly used for friends to stay in touch . LinkedIn-commonly used for business networking, job searches, and recruiting . Others; Instagram, Google +, Flickr, Tumbir, FourSquare, Last.fm, Snapfish for photos, LImeWars for video, Napster for music . Social Media also referred to as Web 2.0 4 Social Networking Facts . The Pew Internet Project Research related to social networking showed that as of January 2014 . 74% of online adults use social media . 71% of online adults use Facebook . 23% of online adults use Twitter . 26% use Instagram .
    [Show full text]