DOCSLIB.ORG

Museum of New Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES U.S. 84 SUNSHINE VALLEY: THE TESTING OF THREE SITES SOUTHEAST OF SANTA ROSA, NEW MEXICO by Peter Y. Bullock Submitted by Timothy D. Maxwell Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 176 SANTA FE 1997 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY Between October 30 and November 10, 1994, the Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, conducted limited archaeological testing atthree sites on U.S. 84 southeast of Santa Rosa, Guadalupe County, New Mexico. Limited testing at LA 105817, LA 57152, and LA 103315 was conducted at the request of the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD), to determine the extent and importance of cultural resources present as partof the proposed improvements alonga 12.8-km (8 miles) stretch of U.S. 84 southeast of Sank Rosa, New Mexico (Levine 1994). LA 103315 is on private and NMSHTD- aquired land. The other two sites (LA105817 and LA 57152) are on State Trust Land. All three sites are surface lithic artifact scatters, and probably represent temporary or seasonal camping locations.No intact features were foundon any of the sites associated with site occupation or use. In all three cases the data potentialof the portions of the sites within theproject area was determined to be minimal beyond that already documented, and no further investigations are recommended. MNM Project 41.589 NMSHTD Project No. NH-084-1(10)18 CPRC Archaeological Survey Permit No. SP-146 New Mexico State Land Office Survey Permit No.931027 CN 2355 J00040 ii CONTENTS Administrative Summary ............................................. ii Introduction ..................................................... 1 Environment ..................................................... 3 Geology .................................................. 3 Climate ................................................... 4 Flora and Fauna ............................................. 4 Cultural Resources Overview .......................................... 6 Paleoindian Period ........................................... 6 Archaic Period .............................................. 6 Pueblo Period ............................................... 7 Plains Indian Occupation ....................................... 7 Hispanic Occupation .......................................... 8 Anglo-American Occupation ..................................... 8 Testing Results .................................................. 10 Field Methods ............................................. 10 LA105817 ............................................... 11 LA57152 ................................................ 11 LA103315 ............................................... 17 Lithic Artifact Analysis............................................. 20 Analytical Methods .......................................... 20 Analytical Results ........................................... 21 Ground Stone Analysis ............................................. 38 Analytical Results ........................................... 38 Discussion and Conclusions .......................................... 40 Assessments and Recommendations ..................................... 48 LA105817 ............................................... 48 LA57152 ................................................ 48 LA103315 ............................................... 49 References Cited ................................................. 50 Appendix 1. Site Locations and Legal Description ........................... 56 ... 111 Figures 1. Project vicinity map .............................................. 2 2 . LA 105817 site map ............................................. 12 3 . LA 105817 site overview .......................................... 13 4 . LA 57152 site map .............................................. 14 5 . LA 57152 site overview .......................................... 15 6 . LA 103315 site map ............................................. 18 7. LA 103315 siteoverview .......................................... 19 8 . LA 57152 one-hand mano ......................................... 38 9 . LA 57152 Martindale-style projectile points ............................. 47 Tables 1. LA 1058 17. artifact morphology by material type .......................... 23 2 . LA 57152. artifact morphology by material type .......................... 24 3 . LA 103315. artifact morphology by material type .......................... 25 4 . LA 105817. flake morphology by portion and platform type................... 26 5 . LA 57152. flake morphology by portion andplatform type .................... 27 6 . LA 103315. flake morphology by portion and platform type................... 28 7 . LA 105817. percent of dorsal cortex by material type ....................... 29 8 . LA 57152. percent dorsal cortex by material type .......................... 30 9. LA 103315. percent dorsal cortex by material type ......................... 31 10 . LA 105817. artifact function by material type ........................... 32 1 1 . LA 57152. artifact function by material type ............................ 33 12. LA 103315. artifact function by material type ........................... 34 13. Site debitage : tool ratios ......................................... 37 14. Cultural affiliation of sitesby topography in the 15 USGS quadrants surrounding the project area ............................................. 41 15. Expected early and late Archaicand Anasazi lithicartifact assemblages ........... 42 16. Comparison of selected lithic artifact assemblage attributes for project sites with sites in the general upper Pecos Valley.......................... 44 17. Comparison of selected lithicartifact assemblage attributes for project sites with sites in thegeneral upper Pecos Valley .......................... 45 18. Comparison of selected lithic artifact assemblage attributes for project sites with sites in thegeneral upper Pecos Valley .......................... 46 iv INTRODUCTION At the requestof William L. Taylor, Environmental Program Manager, New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD), a limited testing program was conducted at three sites(LA 105817, LA 57152, andLA 103315), located onU.S. 84 near Santa Rosa, New Mexico (Fig. 1). LA 103315 is on private land andstate land administered by theNMSHTD. The other two sites are located on State Trust Land. Limited testing was conducted under CPRC Archaeological survey permitNo, SP-146, and New Mexico State Land Office Survey PermitNo. 93/027. Field work was carried out between October 30 and November 10, 1994, conducted by Peter Y. Bullock, assisted by Joy Beasley, Heather Bixler, and Jennifer Noble. Sherry Butler served as a volunteer. Timothy D. Maxwell acted asprincipal investigator. Figures and artifacts were drafted by Robert Turner, the report was edited by Robin Gould, and photographs were printed by Nancy Warren. Limited testing was conducted at LA 105817, LA 57152, and LA103315 to determinethe extent and importanceof the portionof the sites within the proposed project limits. The testing was restricted to the proposed project corridorof planned improvementsto US84, southeast of Santa Rosa, Guadalupe County, New Mexico. Exact site location information is contained in Appendix 1 (removed from copies in general circulation). 1 2 ENVIRONMENT The project locale is in an area bounded by the Pecos River on the west.The northern three-quarters of the project area is bounded on the east by San Juan de Dios Arroyo, which then crosses the projectarea. The northern portionof the project area is located within theSan Juan de Dios Arroyo drainagearea. Elevation within the projectarea ranges from 1,414.1 m (4,670 ft) in the north to 1,348.7 m (4,454 fi) in the south. This area south of Santa Rosa is primarily rolling mixed grassland. Occasional outcropsof exposed sandstone and shaleoccur, principally on the tops of ridges. This exposedbedrock forms an area of breaks along theedge of the San Juan de Dios Arroyo drainage. The area supports a cover of mixed grasses, with juniper-parkland present in rocky areas and slopes. Common invasive species include mesquite, cholla, and narrow leaf yucca. Geology Guadalupe County forms part of the Great Plains physiographic province (Jelinek 1967:35). The terrain ischaracterized by broad plains dipping graduallyeastward. In this region of the southern plains, this eastwarddip ends where it comes intocontact with the caprock of the Llano Estacado. The Pecos Riveris approximately 1.6 km (1.0 miles) to the westof U.S. 84, This is a two- tiered canyon system comprising the oldest portionof the Pecos River Valley, predating the major course shift to the south of the middle Pecos River in the late Pleistocene (Jelinek19675). This portion of the river valley variesin width and is lined for mostof its length bybroken cliffs of the ~ second river terrace, formed of sandstonefrom the Santa Rosa and ChinleFormations (Lucas et al. 1985:172-173). Away from the cliff edges, these Triassic sandstonesare buried in most places by Pleistocene sandsand gravels (Kues et al. 1985:64). Processes of solution have promoteda karst topography along the Pecos Valley. Water acts on underlying beds of gypsumand limestone, causing the collapse of thesurface sandstones and shales of the Santa RosaFormation (Lucas et al. 1985:172). The resulting sinkholes feedsurface runoff into the Pecos River and numerous springs and seeps present along the Pecosterraces River (Levine and Mobley1976: 1 1). Soils within the project
Recommended publications
  • Ancient Pueblitos of the Sandia Foothills

    Ancient Pueblitos of the Sandia Foothills

    ANCIENT PUEBLITOS OF THE SANDIA FOOTHILLS By Hayward H. Franklin Maxwell Museum Technical Series No. 36 Maxwell Museum of Anthropology MSC01, 1050, 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001 maxwellmuseum.unm.edu 2021 Copyright 2021, Maxwell Museum of Anthropology University of New Mexico TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 1 The Foothills Environment.................................................................................................. 2 Overview of Culture History............................................................................................... 4 Previous Studies................................................................................................................... 7 Methods................................................................................................................................9 RESULTS...................................................................................................................................... 11 Site Inventory..................................................................................................................... 11
  • Flaked Stone from the Navajo Springs Great House, Arizona

    Flaked Stone from the Navajo Springs Great House, Arizona

    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Flaked Stone from the Navajo Springs Great House, Arizona Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/54b3k41w Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 13(2) ISSN 0191-3557 Author Warburton, Miranda Publication Date 1991-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Joumal of California and Great Basin Andiropology Vol, 13, No, 2, pp, 230-241 (1991), Flaked Stone from the Navajo Springs Great House, Arizona MIRANDA WARBURTON, Navajo Nation Archaeology Dept., Nordiern Arizona Univ., P.O. Box 6013, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, XN the past 10 to 15 years, flaked stone analy­ to address a variety of issues including pre­ sis has become increasingly emphasized in historic economy, politics, and social organiza­ Southwestern archaeology with a proliferation of tion that are difficult to study through other flintknappers, replicators, and analysts working classes of artifacts. There is, however, an at ceramic period sites and supplementing site inherent problem in the tacit assumption of reports with lithic studies. Detailed lithic many Southwest archaeologists that all aspects smdies are now included in archaeological of a given cultural group are writ large in the reports on ceramic period sites as a matter of ceramic assemblage. Before that assumption course; nonetheless, the Southwest bias towards can be supported, the role of ceramics in pre­ ceramics is still prevalent, and flaked stone historic society must be better understood. For analyses are often considered supplemental to example, in the social realm, to what degree are ceramic analyses. The next step in significant the activities of both genders expressed? Per­ lithic analysis, I believe, is the elevation of data haps ceramics more accurately reflect female derived from lithic studies to a level comparable roles, while the flaked stone assemblage reflects to that accorded to ceramics, and then a compar­ long under-represented male activities.
  • Sean Doy Le 20

    Sean Doy Le 20

    Sean Doyle 2013 Conference Organized by: CONTENTS Acknowledgments ...........................................................................2 Summary Agenda ............................................................................3 Conference Map and Parking Information ................................5 Agenda ............................................................................................6 Business Meeting (Friday morning) .........................................6 Prehistoric Contexts Symposium (Friday afternoon) ...............8 Keynote Speaker (Friday Evening) ..........................................9 Conference and Workshops (Saturday all day) ...................... 10 Martin Room Schedule ...................................................... 13 Curation Methods Workshop (behind the scenes) ............. 13 Posters – Meet the Presenters (on the Mezzanine) ............ 13 Colorado Archaeology Society (CAS) Meeting ................ 13 Poster Presentations (Saturday all day) .................................. 14 Field Trip (Sunday morning) .................................................. 15 Abstracts ....................................................................................... 16 Ward F. Weakly Memorial Fund .................................................. 46 Native American Scholarship and Awardees ................................ 48 2012-2013 CCPA Executive Committees ..................................... 49 CCPA Fellows .............................................................................
  • The Archaeology of Regional Interaction: Religion, Warfare, And

    The Archaeology of Regional Interaction: Religion, Warfare, And

    CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vii FOREWORD xi PREFACE xv 1. CHANGING PERCEPTIONS OF REGIONAL INTERACTION IN THE 1 PREHISTORIC SOUTHWEST Michelle Hegmon, Kelley Hays-Gilpin, Randall H. McGuire, Alison E. Rautman, Sarah H. Schlanger PART 1: REGIONAL ISSUES AND REGIONAL SYSTEMS 2. WHAT IS A REGIONAL SYSTEM? ISSUES OF SCALE AND INTERAC- 25 TION IN THE PREHISTORIC SOUTHWEST Jill E. Neitzel 3. REGIONAL INTERACTION AND WARFARE IN THE LATE PREHIS- 41 TORIC SOUTHWEST Steven A. LeBlanc 4. SCALE, INTERACTION, AND REGIONAL ANALYSIS IN LATE PUEBLO 71 PREHISTORY Andrew I. Duff 5. REGIONAL INTERACTIONS AND REGIONAL SYSTEMS IN THE 99 PROTOHISTORIC RIO GRANDE Winifred Creamer 6. REGIONAL APPROACHES WITH UNBOUNDED SYSTEMS: THE 119 RECORD OF FOLSOM LAND USE IN NEW MEXICO AND WEST TEXAS Daniel S. Amick PART 2: INTERREGIONAL ECONOMIES AND EXCHANGE 7. THEORIZING THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SOUTHWESTERN EX- 151 CHANGE Dean J. Saitta 8. NETWORKS OF SHELL ORNAMENT EXCHANGE: A CRITICAL AS- 167 SESSMENT OF PRESTIGE ECONOMIES IN THE NORTH AMERICAN SOUTHWEST Ronna J. Bradley 9. EXCHANGES, ASSUMPTIONS, AND MORTUARY GOODS IN PRE- 189 PAQUIMÉ CHIHUAHUA, MEXICO John E. Douglas v vi Contents 10. POTTERY, FOOD, HIDES, AND WOMEN: LABOR, PRODUCTION, 209 AND EXCHANGE ACROSS THE PROTOHISTORIC PLAINS–PUEBLO FRONTIER Judith A. Habicht-Mauche PART 3: BEYOND THE BORDERS OF THE TRADITIONAL SOUTHWEST 235 11. SCALE, INNOVATION, AND CHANGE IN THE DESERT WEST: A MACROREGIONAL APPROACH Steadman Upham 12. LIFE AT THE EDGE: PUEBLO SETTLEMENTS IN SOUTHERN NE- 257 VADA Margaret M. Lyneis 13. FREMONT FARMERS: THE SEARCH FOR CONTEXT 275 Richard K. Talbot 14. PREHISTORIC MOVEMENTS OF NORTHERN UTO–AZTECAN 295 PEOPLES ALONG THE NORTHWESTERN EDGE OF THE SOUTH- WEST: IMPACT ON SOUTHWESTERN POPULATIONS Mark Q.
  • Bockman Grant Report

    Bockman Grant Report

    Photographic and Metric Documentation of Early Diagnostic Artifacts from the Bockman Collection by Robert Dello-Russo, Ph.D. James Moore Gavin Bird Office of Archaeological Studies Santa Fe, NM INTRODUCTION This project was undertaken in response to a donation to the Museum of New Mexico by Mr. Neal Bockman in 2007. The donated assemblage of flaked stone artifacts includes drills, scrapers, bifaces and projectile points, the latter of which provide evidence of prehistoric occupations ranging from the Clovis and Folsom Paleoindian Periods (ca. 12,000-10,000 years ago), through the Formative and possibly Proto- Historic Periods (ca. 500 years ago). These artifacts were collected primarily by Mr. Bockman from the uplands of the Rio Chama Valley between Española and Ghost Ranch, NM. Mr. Bockman took pains to complete note cards for almost all of his donated collection and to place the location of each find on a 7.5 minute USGS topographic quadrangle map. Of the 336 actual objects in his donated collection, one (#176) consists of a cache of 7 obsidian bifaces and a second (unnumbered) is a sub-assemblage of 11 projectile points. The Bockman Collection contains a good sample (n = 23) of Paleoindian, Late Paleoindian and Early Archaic projectile points and point fragments. Knowing that a large database of similar age points, collected from portions of northern New Mexico and the San Luis Valley of southern Colorado, had been analyzed recently by M. Jodry (Smithsonian Institution) and B. Vierra (formerly of Los Alamos National Laboratory), we sought to perform a similar, but abbreviated, analysis on the early points from the Bockman Collection and compare our findings to the Smithsonian – Los Alamos database.
  • Solving the Mystery of Chaco Canyon?

    Solving the Mystery of Chaco Canyon?

    VIRTUALBANNER ARCHAEOLOGY BANNER • BANNER STUDYING • BANNER PREHISTORIC BANNER VIOLENCE BANNER • T •ALE BANNERS OF A NCIENT BANNER TEXTILE S american archaeologyWINTER 2012-13 a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy Vol. 16 No. 4 SOLVINGSOLVING THETHE MYMYSSTERYTERY OFOF CHACHACCOO CANYONCANYON?? $3.95 $3.95 WINTER 2012-13 americana quarterly publication of The Archaeological archaeology Conservancy Vol. 16 No. 4 COVER FEATURE 26 CHACO, THROUGH A DIFFERENT LENS BY MIKE TONER Southwest scholar Steve Lekson has taken an unconventional approach to solving the mystery of Chaco Canyon. 12 VIRTUALLY RECREATING THE PAST BY JULIAN SMITH Virtual archaeology has remarkable potential, but it also has some issues to resolve. 19 A ROAD TO THE PAST BY ALISON MCCOOK A dig resulting from a highway project is yielding insights into Delaware’s colonial history. 33 THE TALES OF ANCIENT TEXTILES BY PAULA NEELY Fabric artifacts are providing a relatively new line of evidence for archaeologists. 39 UNDERSTANDING PREHISTORIC VIOLENCE BY DAN FERBER Bioarchaeologists have gone beyond studying the manifestations of ancient violence to examining CHAZ EVANS the conditions that caused it. 26 45 new acquisition A TRAIL TO PREHISTORY The Conservancy saves a trailhead leading to an important Sinagua settlement. 46 new acquisition NORTHERNMOST CHACO CANYON OUTLIER TO BE PRESERVED Carhart Pueblo holds clues to the broader Chaco regional system. 48 point acquisition A GLIMPSE OF A MAJOR TRANSITION D LEVY R Herd Village could reveal information about the change from the Basketmaker III to the Pueblo I phase. RICHA 12 2 Lay of the Land 50 Field Notes 52 RevieWS 54 Expeditions 3 Letters 5 Events COVER: Pueblo Bonito is one of the great houses at Chaco Canyon.
  • THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION of the ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with Cont

    THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION of the ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with Cont

    THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION OF THE ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with contributions by Lisa W. Huckell Robert S. Thompson Cultural Resource Management Division Arizona State Museum University of Arizona Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. I THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION OF THE ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell Contributions by Lisa W. Huckell Robert S. Thompson Submitted by Cultural Resource Management Division Arizona State Museum University of Arizona Prepared for ANAMAX Mining Company 1984 Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. I CONTENTS FIGURES vii TABLES PREFACE xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xvi ABSTRACT xviii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1 The Archaic Period 2 Previous Research 5 2. THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE ROSEMONT AREA AND SURROUNDING REGIONS 11 General Geography 11 Geology 13 Climate 17 Vegetation 19 Fauna 28 The Paleoenvironment 29 Recent Changes in the Local Biotic Communities 30 Long-Term Changes in the Environment 32 3. A FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH AT THE ROSEMONT ARCHAIC SITES 35 Hunter-Gatherer Organization 35 Research Domains 38 Problem Domain I: Subsistence-Settlement Systems 38 Problem Domain II: Cultural and Temporal Affinities 40 Site Selection 41 4. INVESTIGATIONS AT AND DESCRIPTIONS OF THE SITES 43 Field Methods 43 Results of Excavations: Site Descriptions 46 AZ EE:2:62--The Wasp Canyon Site 48 Investigation 50 Features 52 Structures 52 Rock Clusters 56 Artifacts 58 iii iv Contents AZ EE:2:65 59 Investigation 59
  • Monitoring and Discovery Plan

    Monitoring and Discovery Plan

    A CULTURAL RESOURCES MONITORING AND DISCOVERY PLAN FOR MAINTENANCE AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT EXISTING WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION–DESERT SOUTHWEST REGION TRANSMISSION LINES, FACILITIES, AND PROPERTIES IN ARIZONA Prepared for: Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region 615 S. 43rd Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85005 Prepared by: Christopher E. Rayle, MA, RPA Cara Lonardo Environmental Planning Group, LLC 4141 N. 32nd Street, Suite 102 Phoenix, Arizona 85018 EPG Cultural Resource Service Technical Paper No. 2013-11 August 2014 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iii Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1 Culture History of Arizona ...........................................................................................................5 Anticipated Resource Types .........................................................................................................6 Research Design............................................................................................................................7 Research Theme 1: Chronology...........................................................................................7 Research Theme 2: Social Organization and Interaction .....................................................8 Research Theme
  • Museum of New Mexico

    Museum of New Mexico

    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES A DATA RECOVERY PLAN FOR LA 9075, ALONG NM 53, CIBOLA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Stephen C. Lentz Submitted by Yvonne R. Oakes Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 270 SANTA FE 2000 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY The Archaeological Site Stabilization and Preservation Project (ASSAPP), Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, conducted a site evaluation of LA 9075 (the La Vega site), a large multicomponent site along NM 53 in Cibola County, New Mexico, on private lands and highway right-of-way. The New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD) proposes to stabilize areas within the boundaries of the site and within the NMSHTD right-of-way that have been or may be affected by erosion. The Office of Archaeological Studies has been working under contract with the NMSHTD to identify endangered archaeological sites within highway rights-of-way. Subsequent to shoulder construction and improvement by the NMSHTD, additional cultural resources were exposed within the Museum’s project area. The OAS/ASSAPP program identified five major areas within the highway right-of-way at LA 9075 where cultural resources are threatened by erosion. These areas have been targeted for stabilization. In conjunction with the NMSHTD, District 6, the OAS proposes to conduct a data recovery program on the affected areas prior to stabilization efforts. NMSHTD Project No. TPE-7700 (14), CN 9163 MNM Project No. 41.596 (Archaeological Site Stabilization and Protection Project) Submitted in fulfillment of Joint Powers Agreement J0089-95 between the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department and the Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico.
  • Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource

    Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2002 Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource Lauren Meyer University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Meyer, Lauren, "Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource" (2002). Theses (Historic Preservation). 508. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/508 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Meyer, Lauren (2002). Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/508 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Meyer, Lauren (2002). Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/508 uNivERsmy PENNSYLV^NL^ UBKARIE5 Frijoles Canyon, The Preservation of A Resource Lauren Meyer A THESIS In Historic Preservation
  • Social Identity in the Northern San Juan (24-3)

    Social Identity in the Northern San Juan (24-3)

    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org TM Archaeology Southwest Volume 24, Number 3 Center for Desert Archaeology Summer 2010 Social Identity in the Northern San Juan Paul Reed, Center for Desert Archaeology HE STUDY OF SOCIAL IDENTITY has emerged residents of the area were practicing an Archaic hunt- as an important issue in Southwestern archaeo- ing-and-gathering lifestyle.
  • Early and Middle Archaic Projectile Point Technologies in the Closed Basin Area of the San Luis Valley, Colorado

    Early and Middle Archaic Projectile Point Technologies in the Closed Basin Area of the San Luis Valley, Colorado

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2001 Early and Middle Archaic projectile point technologies in the Closed Basin area of the San Luis Valley, Colorado Scott A. Des Planques The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Des Planques, Scott A., "Early and Middle Archaic projectile point technologies in the Closed Basin area of the San Luis Valley, Colorado" (2001). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2124. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2124 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature; ^ P Date: 5Z£//ol ' Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's exphcit consent. MSThcsis\Mansfjeld Library Permission THE EARLY AND MIDDLE ARCHAIC PROJECTILE POINT TECHNOLOGIES IN THE CLOSED BASIN AREA OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY, COLORADO by Scott A.