DOCSLIB.ORG

Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4285, Background And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4285, Background And Background and Comparison of Water-Quality, Streambed-Sediment, and Biological Characteristics of Streams in the Viburnum Trend and the Exploration Study Areas, Southern Missouri, 1995 and 2001 Water-Resources Investigations Report 03–4285 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Background and Comparison of Water-Quality, Streambed-Sediment, and Biological Characteristics of Streams in the Viburnum Trend and the Exploration Study Areas, Southern Missouri, 1995 and 2001 By Suzanne R. Femmer Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4285 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorse ment by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to repro duce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Femmer, Suzanne R., 2004, Background and comparison of water-quality, streambed-sediment, and biological charac teristics of streams in the Viburnum Trend and the exploration study areas, southern Missouri, 1995 and 2001: U.S. Geo logical Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4285, 18 p. iii CONTENTS Abstract. 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and Scope . 3 Description of Study Areas. 3 Methods of Study . 4 Site Selection . 4 Sampling Methods. 4 Statistical Methods . 6 Background Characteristics and Statistical Comparisons. 6 Water Quality . 6 Streambed Sediment. 9 Biological Characteristics . 12 Fish Tissue. 12 Habitat Characteristics . 12 Invertebrate Community . 15 Summary. 16 References. 17 FIGURES 1. Maps showing study areas, stream-water quality, streambed-sediment, and biological sampling sites for investigation of background characteristics. .2 2–5. Photographs showing: 2. Aquatic invertebrates, such as the Hellgrammite, were surveyed as part of the biological investigation . .3 3. Big Spring and Greer Spring, two large springs with recharge areas in the exploration area. .4 4. The Eleven Point River at Turner’s Mill sampling site, looking downstream, 2001 . .5 5. Hurricane Creek at the Ozark Trail sampling site, looking downstream, 2001. .5 6. Graph showing bacteria density at the sampled sites, 1995 and 2001. .9 7. Hierarchal clustering using Euclidean distances and single linkages for invertebrate community data collected in the Viburnum Trend and exploration study areas, 1995 and 2001. 16 iv TABLES 1. Water-quality data from sites sampled in the ViburnumTrend and the exploration study areas, 1995 and 2001. .7 2. Streambed-sediment data from sites sampled in the Viburnum Trend and the exploration study areas, 1995 and 2001. 10 3. Trace element concentrations in fish tissue samples from the Virburnum Trend and the exploration study areas, 1995 and 2001. 13 4. Habitat characteristics of sites sampled in the Viburnum Trend and the exploration study areas, 1995 and 2001. 14 5. Abundance and diversity data for invertebrate samples in the Viburnum Trend and the exploration study areas, 1995 and 2001. 15 6. Pearson correlation matrix for invertebrate samples collected from each sampling site . 15 VERTICAL DATUM Vertical coordinate information is referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29). Elevation, as used in this report, refers to distance above or below NGVD 29. NGVD 29 can be converted to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) by using the National Geodetic Survey conversion utility available at URL http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/TOOLS/Vertcon/ vertcon.html. Background and Comparison of Water-Quality, Streambed-Sediment, and Biological Characteristics of Streams in the Viburnum Trend and the Exploration Study Areas, Southern Missouri, 1995 and 2001 By Suzanne R. Femmer Abstract Bonne Terre—Flat River (Park Hills) area (Old Lead Belt; fig. 1), and mining continued in that area through the early 1950’s. By 1907, Missouri had become the leader in lead ore production Missouri has a long history of lead mining in the Park Hills in the United States, a title the State still holds (St. Louis Post- and Viburnum Trend areas. Lead ore production has been a sig­ Dispatch, June 2, 2002). The Old Lead Belt produced lead ore nificant economic presence since the settlement of Missouri in steadily (peaking during World War II) until the 1950’s when the 1700’s. As lead sources are depleted in active mining areas, the ore mineral content reached about 2 percent lead, and was new areas are being explored for economical ore bodies. The no longer economical to extract. Attention then shifted to the exploration area south of Winona, a possible extension of the area of the 1955 discovery of lead-zinc deposits around Vibur­ Viburnum Trend lead-producing area, lies in an area of intense num (fig. 1). This new source of economical ore, the Viburnum interest because of its scenic beauty and sensitive environment. Trend, was producing lead by the mid-1960’s. Eight under­ Water-quality, streambed-sediment, fish tissue, instream ground mines were in operation between 1960 and 1973 and riparian habitat, and invertebrate-community samples were (Warner and others, 1974). During 2000, there were nine active collected from three sites in the Viburnum Trend for the mines in the Viburnum Trend producing lead ore and its associ­ National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program Black ated minerals, zinc and copper. River synoptic study in 1995 and from four sites in the explora­ tion study area in 2001. The samples, which were collected Although lead-zinc exploration has continued in southern using NAWQA protocols, were analyzed and compared to Missouri since the 1960’s, exploration for new lead deposits establish background conditions and similarities between sites. began in earnest during the late 1970’s and early 1980’s because Bacteria, lead, and zinc concentrations were substantially of declining economical ore reserves in the Viburnum Trend. different between the study areas. Habitat characteristics, such The area south of Winona and north of the Eleven Point River as streambed substrate size and embeddedness were similar. (fig. 1) is an area of intense interest to mining companies The Eleven Point River at Turner’s Mill is substantially larger because it is considered to be a possible extension of the Vibur­ in size than the other six surveyed sites. Trace element concen­ num Trend. More than 300 boreholes have been drilled in the trations in fish tissue samples collected in the two study areas general area between Winona, Big Spring, and Greer Spring are similar. Samples from both areas had elevated mercury lev­ since the recent exploration began. els. Invertebrate community data indicated similarity among the Land use is known to affect aquatic communities in many Viburnum Trend study area sites, but these sites had little in ways. Changes in vegetation and the disturbance of soils create common with the exploration study area sites. The invertebrate the potential for altered runoff, sediment yield, and biological, community structure in the exploration study area were not sim­ chemical, and physical stream characteristics. There generally ilar. is a sequence of action from land use change to the alteration of the physical and chemical habitat to changes in stream biota. Land use disturbances, such as mining, often cause changes in Introduction streambed material and channel morphology (Graf and others, 1995) and changes in the chemical makeup of the water and Lead mining has been a part of Missouri history from the sediment. Bioassessments of stream communities provide an time French prospectors discovered and mined lead from the overall index of stream health. Analyses suggest that without Mine La Motte area near Fredericktown (fig. 1) in the 1700’s. bioassessments there is a risk of not identifying land use effects During the 1860’s, lead mining activities moved north to the to our streams (Rankin, 1995). 2 Characteristics of Streams in the Viburnum Trend and the Exploration Study Areas, Southern Missouri, 1995 and 2001 The study area for the Viburnum Trend includes the upper Black River Basin, the Huzzah and Courtois Creek Basins, and part of the Current River Basin near Blue Spring. 91° Cuba Courto Kansas 38° is City Huzz Potosi MISSOURI St. Louis Steelville a h Park Hills CRAWFORD Old Lead Belt Study Creek WASHINGTON Fredericktown C areas r e e k k Viburnum Bell Mountain Viburnum Wilderness Trend IRON mining district DENT 1 EXPLANATION Johnson’s Shut-Ins State Park STATE FOREST 2 Bla k 37°30¢ c OZARK NATIONAL SCENIC RIVERWAYS Bunker ELEVEN POINT WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 3 R Annapolis iv e LEAD-ZINC MINE r TAILINGS PILE SHANNON REYNOLDS Cu rre 1 SAMPLING SITE AND MAP NUMBER n (table 1) t Ellington Blue Spring Clearwater Lake 0 5 10 MILES Eminence R 0 5 10 KILOMETERS iv er CARTER WAYNE 92° 91°30¢ Mountain SHANNON Winona Van Buren View Cu 37° Willow Springs rr en Big t 4 S p ring Spring H u r CARTER C r Cre k i r c Ele e v a en e e k n 5 e Point 6 R iv e Greer r Spring 7 OREGON Riv West Alton e r Plains HOWELL RIPLEY Thayer 36°30¢.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fishing Opportunities Ouachita National Forest
    FISHING OPPORTUNITIES Page 1 of 27 IN THE RA-24 OUACHITA NATIONAL FOREST FISHING OPPORTUNITIES Page 2 of 27 IN THE RA-24 OUACHITA NATIONAL FOREST This page intentionally left blank FISHING OPPORTUNITIES Page 3 of 27 IN THE RA-24 OUACHITA NATIONAL FOREST RIVERS ....................................Page • Ouachita........................................................3 • Fourche LaFave ...........................................4 • South Fork Fourche LaFave.......................4 • Little Missouri ..............................................5 • Poteau............................................................6 • Glover............................................................6 • Caddo ............................................................7 • Cossatot.........................................................7 • Mountain Fork .............................................8 • Petit Jean.......................................................9 LAKES/PONDS ………………Page…..Location (Quad) • Dry Fork Lake..............................................10....................C-15 • Cedar Lake ...................................................11....................C-3 • Hunter's Pool ...............................................12....................K-3 • Lake Sylvia ...................................................13....................C-18 • Moss Creek Pond .........................................14....................A-11, A-12* • Rock Creek Lake..........................................14....................B-17 • Little Bear Creek
    [Show full text]
  • FISHING OPPORTUNITIES in the OUACHITA NATIONAL FOREST Page 1 of 24
    FISHING OPPORTUNITIES IN THE OUACHITA NATIONAL FOREST Page 1 of 24 FISHING OPPORTUNITIES IN THE OUACHITA NATIONAL FOREST FISHING OPPORTUNITIES IN THE OUACHITA NATIONAL FOREST Page 2 of 24 RIVERS Ouachita Fourche LaFave South Fork Fourche LaFave Little Missouri Poteau Glover Caddo Cossatot Mountain Fork Petit Jean LAKES-PONDS Quad Map Location Dry Fork Lake ..............................................C-15 Cedar Lake ...................................................C-3 Hunter's Pool ...............................................K-3 Lake Sylvia ...................................................C-18 Moss Creek Pond .........................................A-11, A-12* Rock Creek Lake ..........................................B-17 Little Bear Creek Lake ................................C-16 Cove Creek Lake ..........................................B-16 Huston Lake .................................................B-17 Macedonia Pond ...........................................D-10 North Fork Lake ..........................................E-10 Shady Lake ...................................................G-8 Caddo Pond ..................................................F-12, F-13, G-12* Crooked Branch Lake .................................C-3 John Burns Pond ..........................................D-11 Mauldin Ponds ............................................E-11 Old Forester Pond ........................................C-10 Story Pond ....................................................D-12 Cedar Creek Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Integrity Assessment of Ozark Rivers
    ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF OZARK RIVERS TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR PROTECTIVE STATUS by Andrea Radwell Arkansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Department of Biological Sciences University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas 2000 COOP UNIT PUBLICATION NO. 36 ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF OZARK RIVERS TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR PROTECTIVE STATUS ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF OZARK RIVERS TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR PROTECTIVE STATUS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by Andrea Radwell, B.S., M.A. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 1971, 1972 May 2000 University of Arkansas THESIS DUPLICATION RELEASE I hereby authorize the University of Arkansas Libraries to duplicate this thesis when needed for research and/or scholarship. Agreed _______________________________________ Refused ______________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank the many people who have expressed their confidence in me, shared their expertise, and provided the encouragement and guidance needed to complete the research presented in this thesis. Without Dr. Tom Kwak’s initial confidence in my abilities to become a researcher, this project would never have been undertaken. He provided the important step in helping me develop my ideas for this project into a coherent, well-defined research agenda. He has always encouraged me to proceed, never doubting my ability to carry on. He has provided guidance from start to finish. I will always value both his friendship and his contribution to my growth as a graduate student and a researcher. Dr. Art Brown is deserving of acknowledgement for sharing his wealth of knowledge of stream ecology and his enthusiasm for studying and protecting the natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambloplites Constellatus, a New Species of Rock Bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a Review of Western Rock Bass Populations
    Ambloplites constellatus, a New Species of Rock Bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a Review of Western Rock Bass Populations ROBERT C. CASHNER and ROYAL D. SUTTKUS V Reprinted from THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST Vol. 98, No. 1, July, 1977, pp. 147-161 University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana Ambloplites constellatus, a New Species of Rock Bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a Review of Western Rock Bass Populations' ROBERT C. CASHNER Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana 70122 and ROYAL D. SUTTKUS Tulane University, Museum of Natural History, Belle Chasse, Louisiana 70037 ABSTRACT: A new species of rock bass, Ambloplites constellatus, is described from the upland section of the White River in Arkansas and Missouri. It is compared with the closely related northern rock bass (A. rupestris) from Missouri and Meramec river populations, the southern rock bass (A. ariommus) from the Ouachita and Little river drainages, and with other western rock bass populations of undetermined status. Ambloplites constellatus is distinguished from its congeners by its freckled color pattern and slender body form. Ambloplites constellatus occurs throughout the upper White River. There are two records of the species from the Osage River drainage in Missouri. INTRODUCTION In his study of Missouri fishes, Pflieger (1971) noted that rock bass from the upper White River system differed strikingly in color pattern from other Missouri populations. Based on our examination of mate- rial from throughout the Ozark Upland province, as well as other western rock bass populations, we describe the upper White River population as a new species, Ambloplites constellatus, the Ozark rock bass.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES
    ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES Tables STEPHEN T. ROSS University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-520-24945-5 uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 1 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 2 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 1.1 Families Composing 95% of North American Freshwater Fish Species Ranked by the Number of Native Species Number Cumulative Family of species percent Cyprinidae 297 28 Percidae 186 45 Catostomidae 71 51 Poeciliidae 69 58 Ictaluridae 46 62 Goodeidae 45 66 Atherinopsidae 39 70 Salmonidae 38 74 Cyprinodontidae 35 77 Fundulidae 34 80 Centrarchidae 31 83 Cottidae 30 86 Petromyzontidae 21 88 Cichlidae 16 89 Clupeidae 10 90 Eleotridae 10 91 Acipenseridae 8 92 Osmeridae 6 92 Elassomatidae 6 93 Gobiidae 6 93 Amblyopsidae 6 94 Pimelodidae 6 94 Gasterosteidae 5 95 source: Compiled primarily from Mayden (1992), Nelson et al. (2004), and Miller and Norris (2005). uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 3 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 3.1 Biogeographic Relationships of Species from a Sample of Fishes from the Ouachita River, Arkansas, at the Confl uence with the Little Missouri River (Ross, pers. observ.) Origin/ Pre- Pleistocene Taxa distribution Source Highland Stoneroller, Campostoma spadiceum 2 Mayden 1987a; Blum et al. 2008; Cashner et al. 2010 Blacktail Shiner, Cyprinella venusta 3 Mayden 1987a Steelcolor Shiner, Cyprinella whipplei 1 Mayden 1987a Redfi n Shiner, Lythrurus umbratilis 4 Mayden 1987a Bigeye Shiner, Notropis boops 1 Wiley and Mayden 1985; Mayden 1987a Bullhead Minnow, Pimephales vigilax 4 Mayden 1987a Mountain Madtom, Noturus eleutherus 2a Mayden 1985, 1987a Creole Darter, Etheostoma collettei 2a Mayden 1985 Orangebelly Darter, Etheostoma radiosum 2a Page 1983; Mayden 1985, 1987a Speckled Darter, Etheostoma stigmaeum 3 Page 1983; Simon 1997 Redspot Darter, Etheostoma artesiae 3 Mayden 1985; Piller et al.
    [Show full text]
  • As Assessment of Stream Fish Vulnerability and an Evaluation Of
    AN ASSESSMENT OF STREAM FISH VULNERABILITY AND AN EVALUATION OF CONSERVATION NETWORKS IN MISSOURI ___________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri ___________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science ___________________________________________________________ by NICHOLAS A. SIEVERT DR. CRAIG P. PAUKERT, THESIS SUPERVISOR DECEMBER 2014 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled: AN ASSESSMENT OF STREAM FISH VULNERABILITY AND AN EVALUATION OF CONSERVATION NETWORKS IN MISSOURI Presented by Nicholas A. Sievert A candidate for the degree of Master of Science And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. ______________________________________ Dr. Craig Paukert ______________________________________ Dr. Joanna Whittier ______________________________________ Dr. Timothy Matisziw ______________________________________ Dr. Michelle Staudinger ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank the United States Geological Service National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center for funding this project. I would also like to thank the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) for providing the fish community data which served as the foundation upon which this project was completed. Specifically, I would like to thank Matt Combes and Dr. Doug Novinger, who not only provided me with tremendous sources of data for Missouri’s stream fish communities, but also shared with me their expertise and knowledge by reviewing my work and offering invaluable insights. Dorothy Butler of MDC also generously provided fish records from the Missouri Natural Heritage Database. I would also like to thank Gust Annis and the Missouri Resource Assessment Partnership for providing me with GIS data without which this project would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival, Abundance, and Relative Predation of Wild Rainbow Trout in the Deerfield Reservoir System, South Dakota Jeremy L
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Theses and Dissertations 2016 Survival, Abundance, and Relative Predation of Wild Rainbow Trout in the Deerfield Reservoir System, South Dakota Jeremy L. Kientz South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Kientz, Jeremy L., "Survival, Abundance, and Relative Predation of Wild Rainbow Trout in the Deerfield Reservoir System, South Dakota" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. Paper 991. This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SURVIVAL, ABUNDANCE, AND RELATIVE PREDATION OF WILD RAINBOW TROUT IN THE DEERFIELD RESERVOIR SYSTEM, SOUTH DAKOTA BY JEREMY L. KIENTZ A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Major in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Specialization in Fisheries Science South Dakota State University 2016 iii This thesis is dedicated to Jamie, the love of my life. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I want to thank my wife, Jamie, for her enduring love and encouragement throughout our adventures together. I could not have asked for a better companion through many days both good and bad.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2016 Annual Monitoring Report and Ten Year Review
    FY 2016 Annual Monitoring Report and Ten-Year Review of the 2005 Forest Plan Arkansas and Oklahoma Fiscal Years 2006-2016 October 1, 2006 - September 30, 2016 United States Department of Agriculture FY 2016 Annual Forest Service Monitoring Report and 10-year Review of the 2005 Forest Plan Ouachita National Forest Arkansas and Oklahoma Arkansas Counties: Ashley, Garland, Hot Spring, Howard, Logan, Montgomery, Perry, Pike, Polk, Saline, Scott, Sebastian, Yell Oklahoma Counties: LeFlore, McCurtain In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Species Mapping in North Carolina Using Maxent
    Aquatic Species Mapping in North Carolina Using Maxent Mark Endries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Field Office, Asheville North Carolina INTRODUCTION The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is to work with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The Service is the lead governmental agency involved in the recovery of federally endangered and threatened species in freshwater and terrestrial habitats. To meet its recovery and protection goals, the Service: (1) works with other federal agencies to minimize or eliminate impacts to fish, wildlife, and plants from projects they authorize, fund, or carry out; (2) supports the improvement of fish and wildlife habitat on private land through technical and financial assistance; and (3) provides scientific knowledge and analyses to help guide the conservation, development, and management of the Nation’s fish and wildlife resources. Freshwater ecosystems present unique management challenges due to their linear spatial orientation and their association with upland habitat variables. On broad scales, the movement of aquatic species within the stream environment is limited to upstream and downstream migration. The inability of aquatic species to circumnavigate man-made obstacles causes them to be particularly vulnerable to habitat fragmentation. Habitat fragmentation has a major influence on species distribution and complicates distribution mapping. To better understand the spatial distributions of freshwater aquatic species in North Carolina, the Service created predictive habitat maps for 226 different aquatic species using geographic information systems (GIS) and maximum entropy (Maxent) modeling. These maps were derived by comparing known species occurrences with a suite of stream- or land-cover-derived environmental variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Poesten Kill Fact Sheets Merge
    POESTEN KILL FACT SHEET: WATER QUALITY INTRODUCTION Water quality monitoring is an incredibly vital component of stream assessments. Selecting what parameters to include in a stream survey can be challenging, given all the options. However, relatively simple and inexpensive tests, such as temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and water clarity, can provide a tremendous amount of information on overall stream health. By understanding what each parameter measures, its relative importance in an aquatic ecosystem, and how parameters may interact with each other in the natural environment, researchers and citizen scientists can better predict and understand the responses of aquatic organisms. And in doing so, one can make more informed assessments of stream health and prioritize monitoring, restoration, and/or conservation efforts. Thus, an invested interest in water quality is an invested interest in the health, diversity, and abundance of biota. Water quality includes a number of parameters that environmental scientists use to measure the “health” and character of natural waters. Water quality has a direct relationship with the biota living within the water body. Technicians, scientists, and citizens can measure physical and chemical measurements directly in the field (in- situ) or via laboratory analysis. Common water quality parameters include, but are not limited to (1): Temperature Hardness (calcium and Dissolved oxygen magnesium) Salinity (specific conductivity; Major ions (e.g. chloride, sulfate) total dissolved solids) Nutrients (e.g., phosphorus and Turbidity (suspended solids, nitrogen water clarity) Trace metals (e.g. copper, iron)· Alkalinity and pH Trace organic chemicals (e.g. Pathogens / Fecal indicator pesticides, PCBs, herbicides) bacteria (e.g., fecal coliform, E.
    [Show full text]
  • WDNR July, 2001 ACUTE TOXICITY CRITERIA
    DERIVATION OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC TOXICITY CRITERIA FOR NICKEL PREPARED BY: JIM SCHMIDT - WDNR July, 2001 ACUTE TOXICITY CRITERIA EPA SPECIES MEAN ACUTE VALUES (values from 3/86 EPA AWQC document, EPA 440/5-86-004 and 3/95 GLWQI Criteria Document for the Protection of Aquatic Life in Ambient Water) NOTE: Normalized hardness and nickel values are listed for a species when information was available over a sufficient hardness range (EPA: maximum hardness > 3 X lowest hardness and > 100 PPM above lowest hardness). Normalized value equals individual result / geometric mean result (rounded to 3 dec. places). Worm, Nais sp. HARDNESS VALUE METHOD NORMALIZED NORMALIZED REFERENCE (PPM) (ug/L) HARDNESS VALUE 50 14100 S M Rehwoldt, et al. 1973 50 14100 GEO MEAN (1 result) Snail, Amnicola sp. HARDNESS VALUE METHOD NORMALIZED NORMALIZED REFERENCE (PPM) (ug/L) HARDNESS VALUE 50 11400 S M Rehwoldt, et al. 1973 50 14300 S M Rehwoldt, et al. 1973 50 12767.9 GEO MEAN (2 results) Snail, Physa gyrina HARDNESS VALUE METHOD NORMALIZED NORMALIZED REFERENCE (PPM) (ug/L) HARDNESS VALUE 26 239 FT U Nebeker, et al. 1986 26 239 GEO MEAN (1 result) Cladoceran, Daphnia magna HARDNESS VALUE METHOD NORMALIZED NORMALIZED REFERENCE (PPM) (ug/L) HARDNESS VALUE 45.3 510 S U 0.570 0.312 Biesinger and Christensen, 1972 51.1 915 S M 0.643 0.561 Call, et al. 1983 51 1800 S M 0.641 1.103 Chapman, et al. Manuscript 100 2360 S M 1.257 1.446 Chapman, et al. Manuscript 104 1920 S M 1.308 1.176 Chapman, et al.
    [Show full text]