DOCSLIB.ORG

C. HLT Instructor Guide S1 Which Fish Is This.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C. HLT Instructor Guide S1 Which Fish Is This.Pdf FISH K NO ONE FISH, TWO FISH, PANFISH, CATFISH A W n L o E i D t G c E e S Percidae (Perch) E y Which Fish Is This? c o g l l o o g y i o OBJECTIVES: Students will be able to: Iowa Darter (Etheostoma exile) & B • explain how biologists classify organisms Walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) into taxonomic groups Sauger (S. canadense) 1 • identify fish using a key Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) METHOD: Students will use morphological Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens) characteristics to group unlabeled fish from the order Perciformes into families and present their groupings to the class. Students will check their Moronidae (Temp. Bass) work using a fish identification Website and White Bass (Morone chrysops) dichotomous key. Striped Bass (M. saxatilis) MATERIALS: Yellow Bass (M. mississippiensis) 1) Fish Wildcards or images of fish from a fish field guide or in Appendix C, to make fish White Perch (M. americana) cards (see details below). *The underlined species are exotic. 2) Fish identification Website wiscfish.org/fishid SETTING: Indoors See Appendix C for Which Fish is This? DURATION: Two to three 45-minute sessions Fish Images and A Key to Common Wisconsin VOCABULARY: Bag limits, morphology, Fish, a dichotomous key to fish. (Laminate the taxonomic groups, dichotomous key key for outdoor activities.) STANDARDS: PREPARATION: Assemble fish card packs using Science: F 8.5, 12.5, 12.6. images of two to five species (except goby) Environmental Education: B 8.2, 8.4, 8.8. from each of the four Perciformes families found in Wisconsin (Centrarchidae, Moronidae, BACKGROUND: Charles Darwin and Alfred Percidae, and Gobiidae). (The Esocidae cards Wallace both used taxonomic groups to are part of the opening, not the main activity.) formulate their ideas about evolution and Each group will have a different assortment of natural selection. By placing organisms in fish. Make sure that none of the images is groups based on morphology, these biologists labeled. Make one pack for every two to three could see shared traits that were inherited from students. earlier generations. Today, taxonomic groups are established into domains, kingdoms, phyla, Centrarchidae (Sunfish) classes, orders, families, genera, and species. Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) Bony fish are in the class Osteichthyes, which Pumpkinfish (L. gibbosus) contains more than 30 different orders. The order Perciformes (ray-finned fish) is the largest Green Sunfish (L. cyanellus) of these orders and can be divided into 156 White Crappie (Pomoxis annulari) different families. Within these families are thousands of salt- and freshwater species. Black Crappie (P. nigromaculatus) Wisconsin hosts four families of Perciformes: Centrarchidae (sunfish), Moronidae (temperate Rock Bass (Ambloplites rupestris) bass), Percidae (perch), and the non-native Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) Gobiidae (goby). Technology is rapidly improving our under- Gobiidae (Gobies) standing of the family trees of species around Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus) the world. Scientists are continually dividing and subdividing taxonomic groups as they learn Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources • HOOK, LINE, & THINKER: Science Guide 9 more about the molecular and cellular structure chosen. If there is time, have them speculate of organisms and as DNA evidence reveals about which of the families are more closely connections that are difficult to see with the related and what traits a common ancestor naked eye or even a microscope. Still, the most might have shared with them. At the end of basic system of identifying an organism— the small group sessions, have students present looking at its morphology—is an important tool their results to the rest of the class. in all biological studies. Next, or in a subsequent class, have students OPENING: Have students read Which Fish Is identify their fish to determine if they have This? in its entirety. Introduce the concept of appropriately grouped them. Field guides, dichotomous keys with A Taxonomic Grouping the dichotomous key, or the Wisconsin fish of Esocidae. UsePowerPoint or handouts to identification Website are possible tools for show images of the musky, northern pike, and identifying fish that require students to practice grass pickerel. ( See Appendix C). Review using morphological characteristics. If students the anatomical parts and terms from the incorrectly grouped species, discuss why these previous lesson by comparing these species, species were confusing. which are all from the same family (Esocidae). CLOSING: Ask students why anglers should be Have students look at body and mouth shape; able to identify fish and what supplies they the number, placement, and shape of fins; would need to take on a fishing trip to identify placement of the eye; and markings. What do their catch. Students could continue working they have in common? How are they different? on their fish profiles. Have students key out the species using the ASSESSMENT QUESTION: How do diagram in their booklets. dichotomous keys work? MAIN ACTIVITY: Divide students into groups ANSWERS: Using visual cues, identify a species of two or three. Distribute the packs of by working from broad differences to specific unlabeled fish images from Appendix C. Give distinctions. the students 10 to 20 minutes to sort the fish into four families, using their classification skills EXTENSIONS: and knowledge of anatomy. Have them take notes in their booklets about why they are In Depth: Have students create family trees dividing species into the categories they have (Family Ties) for other orders of fish. If you have downloaded this booklet, please see the appendix that follows for additional materials. 10 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources • HOOK, LINE, & THINKER: Science Guide FISH K NO ONE FISH, TWO FISH, PANFISH, CATFISH A W n L o E i D t G c E e S Which Fish Is This? To avoid confusion, Wisconsin conservation wardens use the following specific description E y c o g What did you catch? What does it matter, of fish categories. l o l o g y & B i o anyway? A trout doesn’t care if you call it a By Wisconsin law, game fish are defined as all trout, a carp, or a muskellunge, but conser- varieties of fish except rough fish and minnows. vation wardens do and so should you. Rough fish include: dace, suckers, carp, Many fish are subject to bag limits (the goldfish, redhorse, freshwater drum, burbot, Bag limits 1 number of fish you may catch in a day), while bowfin, gar, buffalo, lamprey, alewife, gizzard The number of fish others are superior in flavor, and still others can shad, smelt, mooneye, and carpsuckers. you may catch in a be unhealthy if eaten too frequently. Legal day requirements, taste preferences, and health Minnows include: suckers, mud minnow, issues are a few important reasons to learn to madtom, stonecat, killifish, stickleback, trout identify what kind of fish you’ve caught. The perch, darter, sculpin, and all species of the problem is, anglers, conservation wardens, and minnow family (except goldfish and carp). scientists may all place different labels on the same fish. Wisconsin law is simplifying the identification process by calling all panfish game fish. This makes it easier to regulate the catch of the most popular species of fish. You might have noticed that the last sentence of the definition above hints of yet another way of identifying fish: by family. For legal purposes, goldfish and carp are not considered minnows, but scientifically they are. Biologists identify fish by their morphology Morphology (structure) rather than by their purpose. Scien- Structure tists use morphology to classify organisms into Taxonomic groups taxonomic groups (groups of closely related Groups of closely organisms) to build family trees and trace the related organisms evolutionary history of everything from plants Surely That’s a to bugs to fish. Dichotomous key GamePanMinnowFish An identification tool Once a scientist has built a family tree, she can The easiest way to identify a fish is to place it in use it to make a dichotomous (die-kot-o-mus) a category based on its purpose. key (an identification tool). Keys begin with broad differences and work toward specific Anglers group fish by taste and how distinctions. challenging they are to catch. To an angler, a panfish is generally a fish that is edible, fits in a By scientific identification, no two fish of frying pan, and is legal to keep. A game fish is different structure will have the same name. A generally any fish that is caught for sport. But, brook trout (Salvelinus frontalis) is in a separate as you can imagine, definitions as broad as taxonomic group from a smallmouth bass PLEASE these can include many different fish and might (Micropterus dolomieu). Of course anglers and SEE APPENDIX C mean something slightly different to each conservation wardens also use this scientific Which Fish is This? person. Ask around: is a walleye a panfish, a system of identification, but not usually the A Key to Common Wisconsin Fish game fish, both, or neither? scientific name. That’s Rough ddddddddddddd The term “rough fish” seems to imply that these species have little or no value, but enlightened anglers, biologists, and chefs know better. Rough fish often inhabit a rough neighborhood, the murky bottom, but that doesn’t mean they don’t taste good. Take a chance and try one sometime! cienc t S e n G e u d i d u e t 7 S Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources • HOOK, LINE, & THINKER: Science Guide 11 Game Fish, Rough Fish, Minnows All Fish Rough Fish Minnows Alewife Buffalo Darters Carp* Killifish Bowfin Carpsucker Madtoms Burbot Mudminnows FW Drum Dace* Gar Sculpin Quillback Goldeye Sticklebacks Goldfish* Redhorse Stonecat Lamprey Trout-perch Mooneye Suckers All Cyprinids Smelt (except carp Shad and goldfish) By state law all fish are “game” fish if not * Taxonomically, carp and goldfish are in the minnow “rough” fish or “minnows.” Game fish may family.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2011 LEC FTG Executive Summary
    FFFOOORRRAAAGGGEEE TTTAAASSSKKK GGGRRROOOUUUPPP Lake Erie Committee EEEXXXEEECCCUUUTTTIIIVVVEEE SSSUUUMMMMMMAAARRRYYY RRREEEPPPOOORRRTTT REPRESENTING THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT AGENCIES OF LAKE ERIE AND LAKE ST. CLAIR MMMAAARRRCCCHHH 222000111111 Introduction The Lake Erie Committee Forage Task Group report addresses progress made in 2010 on four charges: 1. Continue to describe the status and trends of forage fish and invertebrates in each basin of Lake Erie. 2. Continue the development of an experimental design to facilitate forage fish assessment and standardized interagency reporting. 3. Continue hydroacoustic assessment of the pelagic forage fish community in Lake Erie, incorporating new methods in survey design and analysis while following the GLFC’s Great Lakes Hydroacoustic Standard Operating Procedures where possible/feasible. 4. Continue the interagency lower-trophic food web monitoring program to produce annual indices of trophic conditions which will be included with the annual description of forage status. The complete report is available from the Great Lakes Fishery Commission’s Lake Erie Committee Forage Task Group website (http://www.glfc.org/lakecom/lec/FTG.htm#pub), or upon request from an LEC, STC, or FTG representative. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ East Basin Status of Forage walleye diets. Round gobies continue to be important Low (Ontario) to moderate (New York) diet items to white bass and yellow perch in June and abundance of eastern basin forage fish species during August, and are a primary component of smallmouth 2010 was largely attributable to rainbow smelt. Age-0 bass diets sampled in the fall. Mean size of walleye and rainbow smelt abundance increased in 2010, were white bass collected in 2010 was above average for fish captured in greater numbers than yearling-and-older up to age-3.
    [Show full text]
  • SPORT FISH of OHIO Identification DIVISION of WILDLIFE
    SPORT FISH OF OHIO identification DIVISION OF WILDLIFE 1 With more than 40,000 miles of streams, 2.4 million acres of Lake Erie and inland water, and 450 miles of the Ohio River, Ohio supports a diverse and abundant fish fauna represented by more than 160 species. Ohio’s fishes come in a wide range of sizes, shapes and colors...and live in a variety of aquatic habitats from our largest lakes and rivers to the smallest ponds and creeks. Approximately one-third of these species can be found in this guide. This fish identification guide provides color illustrations to help anglers identify their catch, and useful tips to help catch more fish. We hope it will also increase your awareness of the diversity of fishes in Ohio. This book also gives information about the life history of 27 of Ohio’s commonly caught species, as well as information on selected threatened and endangered species. Color illustrations and names are also offered for 20 additional species, many of which are rarely caught by anglers, but are quite common throughout Ohio. Fishing is a favorite pastime of many Ohioans and one of the most enduring family traditions. A first fish or day shared on the water are memories that last a lifetime. It is our sincere hope that the information in this guide will contribute significantly to your fishing experiences and understanding of Ohio’s fishes. Good Fishing! The ODNR Division of Wildlife manages the fisheries of more than 160,000 acres of inland water, 7,000 miles of streams, and 2.25 million acres of Lake Erie.
    [Show full text]
  • The White Perch, Marone Americana (Gmelin) in Nebraska
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Game and Parks Commission -- White Papers, Conference Presentations, & Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Manuscripts 1981 The White Perch, Marone americana (Gmelin) in Nebraska Gene Zuerlein Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamewhitepap Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Zuerlein, Gene, "The White Perch, Marone americana (Gmelin) in Nebraska" (1981). Nebraska Game and Parks Commission -- White Papers, Conference Presentations, & Manuscripts. 56. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamewhitepap/56 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Game and Parks Commission -- White Papers, Conference Presentations, & Manuscripts by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE WHITE PERCH IN NEBRASKA by Gene Zuerlein 10 1 LENGTH (inches) Nebraska Technical Series No.8 NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS COMMISSION Eugene T. Mahoney, Director THE WHITE PERCH, Marone americana (Gmelin) in NEBAASKA by Gene Zuerlein Nebraska Technical Series No.8 Nebraska Game and Parks Commission P. O. Box 30370 Lincoln, Nebraska 68503 1981 A contribution of Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Project F-48-R Nebraska WAGON TRAIN RESERVOIR -N- STAGECOACH RESERVOIR TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction. 7 Description of Study Reservoirs. 7 Literature Survey . 9 Methods and Materials .................................... _. 13 Collecting and Sampling Procedures. 13 Age and Growth. 13 Reproduction. • . .. 13 Spawning Season. .. 13 Fecundity. 14 Sex Ratio. 14 Food Habits. 14 Population Inventories. .. 14 Results and Discussion. .. 15 Age and Growth.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Fish\Eastern Sand Darter Sa.Wpd
    EASTERN SAND DARTER STATUS ASSESSMENT Prepared by: David Grandmaison and Joseph Mayasich Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth, MN 55811-1442 and David Etnier Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee 569 Dabney Hall Knoxville, TN 37996-1610 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 1 Federal Drive Fort Snelling, MN 55111 January 2004 NRRI Technical Report No. NRRI/TR-2003/40 DISCLAIMER This document is a compilation of biological data and a description of past, present, and likely future threats to the eastern sand darter, Ammocrypta pellucida (Agassiz). It does not represent a decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on whether this taxon should be designated as a candidate species for listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act. That decision will be made by the Service after reviewing this document; other relevant biological and threat data not included herein; and all relevant laws, regulations, and policies. The result of the decision will be posted on the Service's Region 3 Web site (refer to: http://midwest.fws.gov/eco_serv/endangrd/lists/concern.html). If designated as a candidate species, the taxon will subsequently be added to the Service's candidate species list that is periodically published in the Federal Register and posted on the World Wide Web (refer to: http://endangered.fws.gov/wildlife.html). Even if the taxon does not warrant candidate status it should benefit from the conservation recommendations that are contained in this document. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16
    NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING2015–16 OFFICIAL REGULATIONS GUIDE VOLUME 7, ISSUE NO. 1, APRIL 2015 Fishing for Muskie www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in effect April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR New York: A State of Angling Opportunity When it comes to freshwater fishing, no state in the nation can compare to New York. Our Great Lakes consistently deliver outstanding fishing for salmon and steelhead and it doesn’t stop there. In fact, New York is home to four of the Bassmaster’s top 50 bass lakes, drawing anglers from around the globe to come and experience great smallmouth and largemouth bass fishing. The crystal clear lakes and streams of the Adirondack and Catskill parks make New York home to the very best fly fishing east of the Rockies. Add abundant walleye, panfish, trout and trophy muskellunge and northern pike to the mix, and New York is clearly a state of angling opportunity. Fishing is a wonderful way to reconnect with the outdoors. Here in New York, we are working hard to make the sport more accessible and affordable to all. Over the past five years, we have invested more than $6 million, renovating existing boat launches and developing new ones across the state. This is in addition to the 50 new projects begun in 2014 that will make it easier for all outdoors enthusiasts to access the woods and waters of New York. Our 12 DEC fish hatcheries produce 900,000 pounds of fish each year to increase fish populations and expand and improve angling opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Darter Etheostoma Exile ILLINOIS RANGE
    Iowa darter Etheostoma exile Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata The Iowa darter averages about two and three- Class: Osteichthyes fourths inches in length. It is a brown or green- Order: Perciformes brown fish with eight to 10 dark marks on the back and 10 to 14 dark blotches on the side separated by Family: Percidae red spaces. There is a dark, teardrop mark under the ILLINOIS STATUS eye and a dark bar in front of the eye, as well as bars on the fins. The lateral line is short, extending to common, native about the second dorsal fin. There are two spines in the anal fin. The cheeks have scales. The breeding male has a blue tint to the back, green side blotches separated by rust-red spaces, wide bands of blue and orange in the first dorsal fin and orange along the lower sides. BEHAVIORS The Iowa darter may be found in glacial lakes in northeastern Illinois, a few streams in northern Illinois and a few limestone quarries in Vermilion County. It lives in clear lakes, sloughs and creeks that have many aquatic plants. In streams it can be found in quiet pools over a mud or clay bottom with dead material and brush. Spawning occurs in April in shallow water over roots, vegetation or debris. The young Iowa darter eats plankton, while the adult feeds on immature insects and small crustaceans. ILLINOIS RANGE © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. female © Konrad P. Schmidt, University of Minnesota male © Konrad P.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambloplites Constellatus, a New Species of Rock Bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a Review of Western Rock Bass Populations
    Ambloplites constellatus, a New Species of Rock Bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a Review of Western Rock Bass Populations ROBERT C. CASHNER and ROYAL D. SUTTKUS V Reprinted from THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST Vol. 98, No. 1, July, 1977, pp. 147-161 University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana Ambloplites constellatus, a New Species of Rock Bass from the Ozark Upland of Arkansas and Missouri with a Review of Western Rock Bass Populations' ROBERT C. CASHNER Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana 70122 and ROYAL D. SUTTKUS Tulane University, Museum of Natural History, Belle Chasse, Louisiana 70037 ABSTRACT: A new species of rock bass, Ambloplites constellatus, is described from the upland section of the White River in Arkansas and Missouri. It is compared with the closely related northern rock bass (A. rupestris) from Missouri and Meramec river populations, the southern rock bass (A. ariommus) from the Ouachita and Little river drainages, and with other western rock bass populations of undetermined status. Ambloplites constellatus is distinguished from its congeners by its freckled color pattern and slender body form. Ambloplites constellatus occurs throughout the upper White River. There are two records of the species from the Osage River drainage in Missouri. INTRODUCTION In his study of Missouri fishes, Pflieger (1971) noted that rock bass from the upper White River system differed strikingly in color pattern from other Missouri populations. Based on our examination of mate- rial from throughout the Ozark Upland province, as well as other western rock bass populations, we describe the upper White River population as a new species, Ambloplites constellatus, the Ozark rock bass.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockfish (Sebastes) That Are Evolutionarily Isolated Are Also
    Biological Conservation 142 (2009) 1787–1796 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Rockfish (Sebastes) that are evolutionarily isolated are also large, morphologically distinctive and vulnerable to overfishing Karen Magnuson-Ford a,b, Travis Ingram c, David W. Redding a,b, Arne Ø. Mooers a,b,* a Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 b IRMACS, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 c Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, #2370-6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: In an age of triage, we must prioritize species for conservation effort. Species more isolated on the tree of Received 23 September 2008 life are candidates for increased attention. The rockfish genus Sebastes is speciose (>100 spp.), morpho- Received in revised form 10 March 2009 logically and ecologically diverse and many species are heavily fished. We used a complete Sebastes phy- Accepted 18 March 2009 logeny to calculate a measure of evolutionary isolation for each species and compared this to their Available online 22 April 2009 morphology and imperilment. We found that evolutionarily isolated species in the northeast Pacific are both larger-bodied and, independent of body size, morphologically more distinctive. We examined Keywords: extinction risk within rockfish using a compound measure of each species’ intrinsic vulnerability to Phylogenetic diversity overfishing and categorizing species as commercially fished or not. Evolutionarily isolated species in Extinction risk Conservation priorities the northeast Pacific are more likely to be fished, and, due to their larger sizes and to life history traits Body size such as long lifespan and slow maturation rate, they are also intrinsically more vulnerable to overfishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Striped Bass
    Can you tell the difference between a striped bass, a white bass and a striped bass hybrid? Anglers need to know the differences between these spe- cies because different sizes, seasons and creel limits apply to striped bass and striped bass hybrids, and to white bass. Knowing the differences between these species can also help you better understand Pennsylvania fishes and our wa- ters. These fish belong to the family Moronidae, temperate basses, also known as “true” basses. In Pennsylvania, this family also includes the white perch. Moronidae species are medium-sized to large-sized active predators and prized trophy and sport fishes. Some species live only in fresh water, while others are anadromous they spend much of their lives in salt water or brackish water but return to fresh water to spawn. Striped Bass Morone saxatilis Identification: The striped bass has a smoothly arched pro- file, slimmer and more streamlined than a striped bass hybrid, until it reaches a weight of five to 10 pounds, when its body becomes heavy-looking. The back is olive-green to steely blue- gray, sometimes almost black. The sides are silvery to pale rapidly and stay in brackish bays at the end of their downstream silvery-green, shading to white on the belly. There are seven float. Juveniles spend their first and second summers in the or eight distinct dark stripes that run laterally on the side of tidal Delaware River with most inhabitating that area from the the body. Striped bass have two dorsal fins, the front spiny- Schuylkill River downstream into the state of Delaware.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Status of Quillback Rockfish Sebastes( Maliger) in U.S
    Agenda Item G.5 Supplemental REVISED Attachment 12 June 2021 DRAFT Status of quillback rockfish Sebastes( maliger) in U.S. waters off the coast of Washington in 2021 using catch and length data by Brian J. Langseth1 Chantel R. Wetzel1 Jason M. Cope1 Tien-Shui Tsou2 Lisa K. Hillier2 1Northwest Fisheries Science Center, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Washington 98112 2Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 600 Capital Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501 June 2021 © Pacific Fisheries Management Council, 2021 Correct citation for this publication: Langseth, B.J., C.R. Wetzel, J.M. Cope, T.S. Tsou, L.K. Hillier. 2021. DRAFT Status of quillback rockfish (Sebastes maliger) in U.S. waters off the coast of Washington in 2021 using catch and length data. Pacific Fisheries Management Council, Portland, Oregon. 111 p. Contents Disclaimer i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Basic Information . 1 1.2 Life History . 1 1.3 Historical and Current Fishery Information . 2 1.4 Summary of Management History and Performance . 2 2 Data 3 2.1 Fishery-Dependent Data . 3 2.1.1 Commercial Fishery . 3 2.1.2 Recreational / Sport Fishery . 5 2.2 Fishery-Independent Data . 6 2.3 Biological Data . 6 2.3.1 Natural Mortality . 6 2.3.2 Maturation and Fecundity . 7 2.3.3 Length-Weight Relationship . 7 2.3.4 Growth (Length-at-Age) . 8 3 Assessment Model 8 3.1 Summary of Previous Assessments . 8 3.1.1 Bridging Analysis . 8 3.2 Model Structure and Assumptions .
    [Show full text]
  • AN ANALYSIS of SEXUAL DIMORPHISM in LENGTH and WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS of IOWA DARTERS Margaret a Harings Northland College, CB: 853 1411 Ellis Ave Ashland, WI 54806
    AN ANALYSIS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN LENGTH AND WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS OF IOWA DARTERS Margaret A Harings Northland College, CB: 853 1411 Ellis Ave Ashland, WI 54806 ABSTRACT Iowa darters, Etheostoma exile, are commonly found throughout the Lake Superior watershed. However, given their abundance and non-game status, little is known about basic life history characteristics of these fish. Iowa darters were seined from Inch Lake (Bayfield County, WI) in May of 2010 and 2011 to assess sexual dimorphism in sizes. Collected fish were immediately frozen and later thawed and measured for total length (TL) and total weight (TW), and dissected to remove the gonads which were also weighed. Somatic weight (SW) was calculated for each fish. The mean TL of males and females did not differ. There was a weak difference in the relationships between log(TW) and log(TL) between male and female Iowa darters. There was a strong difference in the relationships between the log(GW) and log(TL) for males and females. However, a significant difference did not exist between log(somatic weight) and log(TL) between males and females. The weak difference in the TL-TW relationship between males and females appear to be due to the strong difference in the TL-GW relationship between the sexes. Additional research is planned to determine whether differences between males and females occur in age structure and diet. INTRODUCTION Iowa darters are small fish that are typically found in clear to slightly turbid, light brown water of small lakes, bogs, and small streams (Becker 1983). The range of Iowa darters extends east to New York, west to Montana, north to southern Canada, and south to portions of Illinois (Scott and Crossman 1973; Lee and Gilbert 1978).
    [Show full text]