Heritage Assesment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heritage Assesment Rollins House Excelsior Works 53-57 Rollins Street SE15 1EP Unlisted building not within a Conservation Area HERITAGE ASSESMENT Prepared by: August 2015 Prepared for: Stephen Levrant Heritage Architeccture. Ltd. RENEWAL 62 British Grove, Chiswick, London W4 2NL T: 020 8748 5501 F: 020 8748 4492 ROLLINS HOUSE August HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 2015 Rollins House – Heritage Assessment All Rights reserved. Copyright © Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd. While Copyright in this volume document report as a whole is vested in Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd., copyright to individual contributions regarding sections of referenced works belongs to their respective authors, and no part may be reproduced, transmitted stored in a retrieval system in any form or by any mean whether electronic, mechanical, via photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the previous consent from Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd. Document production © Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd 2015. Final Issued: August 2015 Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd is a Limited Liability Partnership Registered in England 3053944 • VAT GB656883581. Registered office: 62 British Grove, London, W4 2NL. © Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd 2 ROLLINS HOUSE August HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 2015 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Aim of this Report ................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Authorship .............................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Methodology Statement .......................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Literature and Documentary Research Review ................................................ 4 1.3.2 Area Surveying ................................................................................................ 4 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 5 2.1 Statutory sites ......................................................................................................... 7 3 THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA ................................................... 9 3.1 Development of the area ......................................................................................... 9 3.2 The Excelsior Works Site ........................................................................................ 9 3.3 Map regression ..................................................................................................... 10 4 Aerial photographic evidence ....................................................................................... 19 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUILDING ............................................................................. 22 6 SIGNIFICANCE APPRAISAL ....................................................................................... 26 6.1 Summary of significance ....................................................................................... 32 7 PRINCIPLES OF SELECTION FOR LISTED BUILDINGS ........................................... 32 7.1 Architectural Interest ............................................................................................. 32 7.2 Historic Interest ..................................................................................................... 32 7.3 Age and Rarity ...................................................................................................... 32 7.4 Aesthetic Merits .................................................................................................... 32 7.5 Selectivity ............................................................................................................. 32 7.6 National Interest .................................................................................................... 32 7.7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 33 8 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 33 APPENDIX: Responses to objections ................................................................................. 34 1. Objection Letter from The Peckham Society ............................................................. 38 2. Objection Letter from Gabriella Kardos, Jeff Lowe, Willow Winston, Terence William, Nicholas Ashley ............................................................................................................... 40 3. Objection Letter from 20th-Century Society ............................................................... 41 4. Summary of Objections (produced by unknown third party) ...................................... 42 5. Historic England Assessment ................................................................................... 45 © Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd 3 ROLLINS HOUSE August HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 2015 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Aim of this Report The purpose of this Heritage Statement is to assess the significance of Rollins House and the contribution it makes to the surrounding area in the context of the Planning Application DC/14/88305 for its redevelopment. This report sets out: A brief history of the site and the area around the site A summary of the significance of the building The Appendix sets out a response to objections received by Lewisham Council to the proposed redevelopment of Rollins House, based on the significance assessment. 1.2 Authorship This heritage statement has been prepared by Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd, which specialises in the historic cultural environment. Stephen Levrant [RIBA, AA Dip, IHBC, Dip Cons (AA), FRSA] – Principal Architect Dorian Crone – [RIBA, MRTPI, IHBC] - Senior Associate Architect Alexandra Niculici [Dipl. Arch, MSc Hist Cons] – Architectural Conservation Consultant Daniel Cummins [MA (Oxon) PhD] – Historic Buildings Consultant 1.3 Methodology Statement This assessment has been carried out using desk-based data gathering and fieldwork. The methods used in order to undertake the study were the following: 1.3.1 Literature and Documentary Research Review The documentary research was based upon primary and secondary sources of local history and architecture, including maps, drawings and reports. Attention was given to the National Archives, the RIBA Library and Archives, the London Metropolitan Archives and the London Borough of Lewisham Local History Library and Archives. Dates of elements and construction periods have been identified using documentary sources and visual evidence based upon experience gained from similar building types and construction sites. 1.3.2 Area Surveying A survey of the surrounding areas was conducted in November 2014 by visual inspection to analyse the site and the exterior of Rollins House. The basement and ground floor have also been inspected but there was no access to the first floor apartment or to the entrance tower. © Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd 4 ROLLINS HOUSE August HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 2015 2 GENERAL INFORMATION The site is located in the northern part of the London Borough of Lewisham, south of the South Bermondsey train station (Fig.1). Rollins House is part of the Excelsior Works site and it refers to a group of buildings which consist of the new build unit A (semi-complete), Unit B which fronts Rollins Street and is the original building, Units C and D which are a much later addition, and Unit 12 Excelsior Works (Fig.2 and 3). This report comprises an assessment of Unit B of Rollins House, henceforward referred to as Rollins House. Figure 1 Approximate location of Rollins House within the Borough of Lewisham © Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd 5 ROLLINS HOUSE August HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 2015 Figure 2 Aerial view. The Rollins House is marked by a red rectangle, while the other Units A,C,D and E are marked in green. The Excelsior Works site is marked in blue. (© Bing) Figure 3 Aerial view. The Rollins House is marked by a red rectangle, while the other Units A,C,D and E are marked in green. The Excelsior Works site is marked in blue. (© Google) © Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd 6 ROLLINS HOUSE August HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 2015 Figure 4 Aerial view of Rollins House (marked in red). The Excelsior Works site is marked in blue (© Bing) 2.1 Statutory sites The site is not located within any of the designated Conservation Areas of the London Borough of Lewisham (Fig.5). There are no designated heritage assets in the close vicinity of the subject site or within the site itself. © Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd 7 ROLLINS HOUSE August HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 2015 Figure 5 Location of Rollins House respective to the designated Conservation Areas within the Borough of Lewisham (©London borough of Lewisham) © Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd 8 ROLLINS HOUSE August HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 2015 3 THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA 3.1 Development of the area Since its beginnings, the village of Lewisham (called Levesham - meaning ‘the house among the meadows’ – during Saxon times) was closely connected to the river, with early development and industry along the waterfront while the rest of the area remained undeveloped. The 19th century industrialization and the construction of railways brought rapid urbanisation to the
Recommended publications
  • Discover the History of Southwark by Bike Train
    Discover the history of Southwark by Bike Train Practice cycling a low-traffic route to Central London whilst learning more about Southwark – it’s our guide to the local history you can find along the Bike Train We know that starting cycling can be a bit daunting, which is why we organise the Southwark Bike Train ride. This shows cyclists how to get to central London along low traffic routes from Nunhead, Peckham and Denmark Hill, via Burgess Park. The Bike Train route is safe and largely car-free. It’s a good route for many commuters – but it’s also a nice way to practice cycling and navigating longer distances. To make it a bit more fun for anyone that wants to practice walking or cycling the route we have written this guide to the local history of the area. You could ride it yourself, or make it into an afternoon’s walk with friends or family. The route starts at Denmark Hill train station, goes to Burgess Park (and the Burgess Park café) before travelling up to Blackfriars and the North-South cycle superhighway to Central London. By bike it should take about 40 minutes, and on foot about 1 hour and 30 minutes. During warmer months we run a group Bike Train ride every Wednesday morning, and during the winter we go once a month (for specific times see our events page). The Route To start with you will need to download or print the route to the bike train from our ride-routes page. Part One: Denmark Hill to St Giles Starting at Denmark Hill train station, come out of the station and turn right, then immediately turn right again down Willow Walk.
    [Show full text]
  • ROTHERHITHE 2) (B) Dockmasters Office and Clock Tower (1892) Mid C19 Steam Grain Mill and Warehouse
    Sites of interest (numbered on map overleaf) 26) Old School House (1697) Est. 1613 for education of 8 sons of seamen by Peter Hills. Moved here 1795 1) (A) Deal Porters Statue, by Philip Bews Dockers carrying heavy timber across shoulders 27) Thames Tunnel Mills ROTHERHITHE 2) (B) Dockmasters Office and Clock Tower (1892) Mid C19 steam grain mill and warehouse. Site of steam ferry. Early residential conversion Rotherhithe, originally called Redriff from C13 and frequently 3) King George’s Field (public open space dedicated to King George V (1865-1936) 28)* (R) Mayflower Inn (1780) (formerly Spreadeagle) mentioned by the C17 diarist Samuel Pepys, came from the Site of All Saints Church. Destroyed during WWII List of passengers who sailed on the Mayflower. Licensed to sell US and UK stamps Anglo Saxon for a haven where cattle were landed. It was closely connected to Bermondsey Abbey, as well as having 4) Metropolitan drinking trough (from 1865) 29) (B) (D) Rotherhithe Picture Research Library & Sands Films Studios (Grice's Granary ancient river crossing points associated with shipbuilding and Fountains established by public subscription for humans, then troughs for horses and dogs, 1795) Library includes section on Rotherhithe. Film studio, production and costume making following C19 out breaks of cholera due to contaminated drinking water facilities. Houses one of London's smallest cinemas. www.sandsfilms.co.uk supporting trades (from C17 and probably from the middle ages), and seafaring is recorded in church memorials and 5) (B) Site of St. Olave's Hospital (1870-1985) 30)* (A) (B) (R) (D) Brunel Museum and Cafe (1842) gravestones.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, Novembek 28, 1862. 6077
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBEK 28, 1862. 6077 143, 146, 148, 272, 286, and 287; 11 and 12 Vic., and places, or some of them, that is to say, Saint caps. 62, 71, and 114: 12 and 13 Vic., cap. 84; Mary, Rotherhithe, in the county of Surrey, and 13 and 14 Vic., cap. 61 ; 14 and 15 Vic., caps. Saint Paul, Deptford, in the county of Kent, and 45 and 114; 16 and 17 Vic., cap. 60; 18 and 19 to terminate in the said parish of Saint Paul, Dept- fie., cap. 124; 20 and 21 Vic., cap. 138; 21 ford, by a junction with the tramway of the Com- and 22 Vic., cap. 113; 22 Vic., cap. 35; 23 and mercial Dock Company, at or near" the gates 24 Vic., cap. 168; 24 and 25 Vic., cap. 70; separating that tramway from the' .Deptford and 25 and 26 Vic., 'cap. 1, and any other Acts Branch Railway of the London, Brighton, arid relating to the Great Northern Railway Com- South Coast Railway, and also by a double junc- pany. tion with the said Deptford Branch Railway, one Duplicate plans and sections describing the line, of such junctions to be about 167 yards west .of situation, and levels of the proposed railway and the point where the said Deptford branch crosses works, and the lands, houses, and other property over the Deptford Lower-road, and.tKe other at proposed to be taken' for the purposes .thereof, or near where, the said Deptford branch crosses together with a book of reference, to such plans the Grand Surrey Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Docklands History Group Meeting Wednesday 1St August 2007 London Locks, Docks, and Marinas by Jeremy Batch
    Docklands History Group meeting Wednesday 1st August 2007 London Locks, Docks, and Marinas By Jeremy Batch Jeremy gave us a very interesting whistle stop tour through the history of the area from BC up to date. He started with the effects of war and Roman invaders defeating the Belgae, despite fierce resistance. The Romans then built London Bridge. He made the point that there was not a tide of 20 feet in those days where the bridge was sited. Some bridge remains had been found when the Jubilee Line Station near London Bridge had been excavated. In 410 AD the legions withdrew, but not all the Romans. In 890 the Danes raided up the Lee to Hertford, sacked it and built a fort. At Ware King Alfred built a dam and diverted the river to maroon their ships. In 984 in China, Qiao Weiyue had a problem, grain barges were being raided and the Emperor was unhappy. He did what many men do in times of crises, he built a shed. This shed was the first pound lock. In 1016 when Cnut raided up the Thames and found his way blocked by London Bridge, he did what another invader would do 900 years later when faced with the impregnable Maginot Line, he went round it. The Vikings did this by digging a channel to the south. The channel was subsequently used as a diversion for the river water when London Bridge was re-built. In 1076 the White Tower was built by the Normans and in 1150 Queen Matilda established a Hospital on a tidal inlet, which was known as the Royal Foundation of St Katharine by the Tower.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Schemes for a London to Croydon Canal
    SCHEMES FOR A LONDON TO CROYDON CANAL CHAPTER 1 SCHEMES FOR A LONDON TO CROYDON CANAL The Domesday survey of 1086 noted the existence of a church and a mill at Croydon, and a population of about 365. But by the mid-17th. century, Croydon had grown to become the principal town in east Surrey and an important market centre where agricultural produce from the neighbouring districts was collected for conveyance to London. Several small industries grew up in and around the town, which also became a seat of local government administration. By as early as the 13th. century the town had expanded from its original Saxon site at Old Town towards higher ground to the east, and developed on the line of the present High Street. Here, on what was to become the Brighton Road, several coaching inns were later established. This road, however, like most of the roads in Surrey, was not kept in good repair. In 1718, when the Surrey and Sussex Turnpike Trust was set up, the road between Croydon, Godstone and East Grinstead was declared in the Act of incorporation to be "so very ruinous and almost impassable for the space of five months in the year that it is dangerous for all persons, horses, and other cattle to pass."[1] The establishment of this and other turnpike trusts led to some improvements of the roads under their care, but they were still in general not suitable for heavy traffic. In 1805 James Malcolm in his "Compendium of Modern Husbandry" commented on the bad state of the roads in Surrey, and rebuked various turnpike trustees for neglecting their duty to maintain them.
    [Show full text]
  • Speed on Canals.” by FEANCISROUBILIAC CONDER, M
    160 ADXISSIONS AND ELECTIONS. [Minutes of Associafe IlIe1r~71err. HORACEALLEN, Stud. Inst.C.E. GEOXGEDALLAS MARSTOX, Stud. Inst. JAMES ATEINSON. C.E. ARTHUR BARCLAY. CHARLESEDWARD MASTERMAN. CHARLESWILLIADX BARNETT. JOHXNETHVEN. FELICIANOMENDES DE MESQUITA \vILLIAM BURTON8bVILLE IIILLS, BARROS. Stud. Inst. C.E. WILLIAM BASHALL, Jun., Stud.Inst. WILLIAU PCRCELLOWEILL, Stud. C.E. Inst. C.E. PERCYBENHAB~, Stud. Inst.C.E. CAHILOGUILLERXO PARDO,Stud. EDWARDROBERT BIRCH, B.A., B.E., Inst. C.E. Stud. Inst. C.E. CHARLES DONALD NAPIERPAREEL HARRYBIRD. HENRYPARKES, Stud. Inst. C.E. WILLIAMNISBET BLAIR, Stud. Inst. WILLIAM MORROPEARSE. C.E. CHARLESBERKELEY PENLINGTOB, CARL RODERIQUELOUIS MENNI BONN. Stud. Inst. C.E. THOXASSMITH BRIGHT,Stud. Inst. WILLIADIFRANK PETTIGREW, Stud. C.E. Inst. C.E. CHARLESEDWIX BROWN. WILLIAXHEXRY RADFORD. WILLIAMHENRY BURR. WILLIAXREID. JAMESBUTLER. PETERROBERTS. ALBERTHAVELOCK CASE. HENRY GEORGEARCHIBALD ROUSE. ALFRED CREER. HEXRYROYLE. FITZHERBERT RUXTOXDESPARD. ROBERT ALLENWILLIAM SNINNERTON. HEXRYFRANCIS DOREY, Stud. Inst. ALBERTHARRISON TURNER. C.E. PERCYJOHN WATES. QEORGEHOLLAND ERSKINE, Stud. Inst. THOMASDUNClN WEIR, Stud.Inst. C.E. C.E. HARRYF~ANCIS. I~AU~IICEFITZGER.4LD WILSON, Stud. JAMESFRENCH. Inst. C.E. ROBERTMACNISH GALE. JOHN i%CKWORTH WOOD. RICHARDHACK. FREDERICKADLARD WRIGHT, Stud. GEORGE HOWARDHARBISON. Inst. C.E. LLOYDHASSELL, Stud. Inst. C.E. ROBERTW.4DE WRIGHT, Stud. Inst. PERDINANDHUDLESTON. C.E. WILLIAMOWEN LGCAS. Associate. WILLIAVWAKEFORD. ‘‘ Speed on Canals.” BY FEANCISROUBILIAC CONDER, M. INST.C.E. THEamount of resistance tothe propulsion of vessels through narrowchannels, due to the size, the form, andthe surface of the channel,has not hitherto been fully studied. Thatthis Downloaded by [ University of Liverpool] on [15/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved. PLATE 1 e% 120'.0" X 20'.0' FORT H AND C LVD E.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers of John Rennie (1761­1821), Thomas Telford (1757­1834) and Related Figures from the National Library of Scotland
    INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: A DOCUMENTARY HISTORY Series Two: Papers of John Rennie (1761­1821), Thomas Telford (1757­1834) and related figures from the National Library of Scotland DETAILED LISTING ­ PART 2 REEL 21 MSS. 19771­19965 RENNIE PAPERS (continued) (see page 11 of this guide for an introduction to the Rennie Papers) MSS. 19831­19929 NOTEBOOKS Throughout his career, particularly during the 1790s, Rennie filled many notebooks with information about the works he himself was involved with, and about others which he visited out of professional curiosity. The books are mostly narrow octavos, interleaved with blotting paper. Rennie seems to have carried them with him on his frequent travels and to have filled them in pencil, rewriting in ink, often on top of the pencil, at some more convenient moment. Rennie received much of his information orally, and in consequence the spelling of place names is not always accurate, and some places at least cannot be certainly identified. The notebooks also contain addresses, booklists (especially of the early technological books and medieval chronicles in which he was interested), and notes of expenses for his travels which often make it clear where he went and when. This series of notebooks does not contain those which relate exclusively to subject represented elsewhere amongst the papers. These have been placed with other relevant material. MSS. 19831­19902 are arranged chronologically, and all relate to a number of different works. 19903­25, also in chronological order, relate to specific works. 19926­31 are miscellaneous notes of receipts, calculations etc. All are octavo unless otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements, 53, 42; Simulated High Altitude Tests, 55, 237
    The Newcomen Society for the history of engineering and technology Welcome! This Index to volumes 51 to 65 of Transactions of the Newcomen Society is freely available as a PDF file for you to print out, if you wish. If you have found this page through the search engines, and are looking for more information on a topic, please visit our online archive (http://www.newcomen.com/archive.htm). You can perform the same search there, browse through our research papers, and then download full copies if you wish. By scrolling down this document, you will get an idea of the subjects covered in Transactions (volumes dating from 1979 to 1994 only), and on which pages specific information is to be found. The most recent volumes can be ordered (in paperback form) from the Newcomen Society Office. If you would like to find out more about the Newcomen Society, please visit our main website: http://www.newcomen.com. The Index to Transactions (Please scroll down) General Index Transactions, Volumes 51-65 1979-1994 Abbreviations agric. agricultural archt. architect bldr. builder c. circa cent. century civ. engr. civil engineer contr. contractor elec. engr . electrical engineer engr. engineer ff. following i.c.. internal combustion loco. locomotive mech. engr. mechanical engineer merchts. merchants mfrs. manufacturers pm. passim rly. railway Abbeydale Industrial Hamlet, 60, 104, 163. Abbot, J. G. & Co., engrs., 52, 72, 196, 198, 54, 47. Abbott, O. C., 59, 23. Abbott, Nancy M., obituary, 61, 112. Abbott, R. A. S., obituary, 52, 219. Abdul Aziz, Sultan ofTurkey, 59, 67, 71. Abernethey, James, 62, 120, 124.
    [Show full text]
  • End of Project Report for HLF 2508014 Final
    Friends of Burgess Park Bridge to Nowhere Self-Evaluation Report July 2014 Heritage Lottery Fund Contact Details [email protected] www.bridgetonowhere.friendsofburgesspark.org.uk www.friendsofburgesspark.org.uk Introduction This is a self-evaluation end of project report completed by Friends of Burgess Park about the Heritage Lottery Funded project “Bridge to Nowhere” . HLF Project Number: YH-11-03852 Total HLF Approved funding for Project: £51,500 Total project budget £53,500 Total Cost of the Project: £52,698 Actual Project Start Date: 20 April 2013 Actual Project End Date: 31 July 2014 1. Executive Summary The Friends of Burgess Park received £51,500 from the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) for an exciting project “Burgess Park: The Bridge to Nowhere” exploring the history and unusual development of Burgess Park in Southwark. Led by volunteers from the local community, the project enables local people to find out more about how Burgess Park has been created out of the urban landscape over the last sixty years. The project had a number of strands including public events, activities for young people and heritage research. The project enabled people to take part as volunteers in lots of different ways ranging from supporting at events through to research at the Southwark Heritage Library. The project has been delivered very successfully with the expert help from a freelance heritage project co-ordinator. We have achieved all of our plans and as a permanent legacy from the project we have: Bridge to Nowhere website Oral history shorts online and also more detailed histories lodged with the Southwark Local Heritage Library Heritage trail Heritage plaques across the park Canal heritage underpass installation 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Croydon, Merstham & Godstone Iron Railway
    THE CROYDON, MERSTHAM& GODSTONE IRON RAILWAY A SHORT CHAPTER IN A LONG STORY by Paul W Sowan he 200thanniversary of the opening of the TCroydon, Merstham, and Godstone Iron Railway (CMGIR) was celebrated by members of the Croydon Natural History and Scientific Society walking the line (as close as could be) on Sunday afternoon, 24th July 2005. Described, variously, as the world's first, second, or third public railway (and it may have been the fourth or fifth!), this horse-drawn goods line has been recognised by the Institution of Civil Engineers as an Historic Engineering Work, and parts (only) of the surviving earthworksand structures are scheduled as an Ancient Monument. The CMGIRwas a legally distinct extension of the similar but earlier Surrey Iron Railway (SIR) which had opened from Wandsworth to Croydon (Pitlake) in 1803. Both lines were rendered obsolescent by Map of the route of the CMGIR the opening of the London & Adapted from D A Bayliss(1985) Croydon Railway (from London 53 LOCAL HISTORY RECORDS Bridge) in 1839, and the London & Brighton and the South Eastern Railways in 1841, on which steam locomotives hauled passenger carriages as well as goods wagons. The SIR survived as an operational railway until 31stAugust 1846, but the last public use of the CMGIRwas on 27thSeptember 1838, as a result of the London & Brighton purchasing its track, parts of which were required for the new line. When the CMGIRwas closed, its 20,000 or so three-feet-long iron tram plates, and a similar number of square stone sleeper blocks, were sold for scrap or re-use.
    [Show full text]
  • ROTHERHITHE 27) (L) Thames Tunnel Mills 2) (B) (L) Dockmasters Office and Clock Tower (1892) Mid C19 Steam Grain Mill and Warehouse
    Sites of interest (numbered on map overleaf): 26) (L) Old School House (1697) Est. 1613 by Peter Hills for education of 8 sons of seamen. Moved here 1795 1) (A) Deal Porters Statue, by Philip Bews Dockers carrying heavy timber across shoulders ROTHERHITHE 27) (L) Thames Tunnel Mills 2) (B) (L) Dockmasters Office and Clock Tower (1892) Mid C19 steam grain mill and warehouse. Site of steam ferry. Early residential conversion Rotherhithe, originally called Redriff from C13 and frequently mentioned by the C17 diarist Samuel Pepys, came from the 3) King George’s Field (public open space dedicated to King George V (1865-1936) 28)* (R) Mayflower Pub (1780) (formerly Spreadeagle) Anglo Saxon for a haven where cattle were landed. It was closely Site of All Saints Church. Destroyed during WWII List of passengers who sailed on the Mayflower in 1620 www.themayflowerrotherhithe.com connected to Bermondsey Abbey, as well as having ancient river 4) Metropolitan drinking trough (from 1865) Fountains established by public subscription for 29) (B) (D) (L) Rotherhithe Picture Research Library & Sands Films Studios (Grice's crossing points associated with shipbuilding and supporting humans, then troughs for horses and dogs, following C19 out breaks of cholera due to Granary 1795) trades (from C17 and probably from the middle ages), and contaminated drinking water Library includes section on Rotherhithe. Film studio, production and costume making facilities. Houses one of London's smallest cinemas www.sandsfilms.co.uk seafaring is recorded in church memorials and gravestones. 5) (B) Site of St. Olave's Hospital (1870-1985) On site of workhouse said to have influenced Rotherhithe Street housed ship builders, seafarers, doss houses, Dickens’ portrayal of workhouses.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Peckham, London Borough of Southwark Historic Area Assessment
    RESEARCH DEPARTMENT REPORT SERIES no. 54-2009 ISSN 1749-8775 CENTRAL PECKHAM, LONDON BoroUGH OF SOUTHWARK historic AREA ASSESSMENT Joanna Smith and Johanna Roethe Research Department Report Series 054- 2009 CENTRAL PECKHAM LONDON BOROUGH OF SOUTHWARK HISTORIC AREA ASSESSMENT Joanna Smith and Johanna Roethe NGR: TQ 3424 7635 © English Heritage ISSN 1749-8775 The Research Department Report Series incorporates reports from all the specialist teams within the English Heritage Research Department: Archaeological Science; Archaeological Archives; Historic Interiors Research and Conservation; Archaeological Projects; Aerial Survey and Investigation; Archaeological Survey and Investigation; Architectural Investigation; Imaging, Graphics and Survey, and the Survey of London. It replaces the former Centre for Archaeology Reports Series, the Archaeological Investigation Report Series and the Architectural Investigation Report Series. Many of these are interim reports which make available the results of specialist investigations in advance of full publication. They are not usually subject to external refereeing, and their conclusions may sometimes have to be modified in the light of information not available at the time of the investigation. Where no final project report is available, readers are advised to consult the author before citing these reports in any publication. Opinions expressed in Research Department reports are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of English Heritage. Requests for further hard copies, after the initial print run, can be made by emailing: [email protected] or by writing to: English Heritage, Fort Cumberland, Fort Cumberland Road, Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD Please note that a charge will be made to cover printing and postage.
    [Show full text]