Issue 344 10 March 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Issue 344 10 March 2021 Issue 344 � 10 March 2021 socialist.net 2 What We Stand For Issue 344 WHO ARE WE? and WHAT ARE WE FIGHTING FOR? old measures are required to deal reopen should be in the hands debt through government borrow- with the coronavirus crisis. Only a of workplace committees and the ing, the money needed should be Bclear socialist programme can offer trade unions. And it must be based obtained entirely from expropriating a way forward. on the implementation of health and the accumulated profits of big busi- safety measures and a safe working ness. We must have no faith in the Tories or environment. The costs for this must their hangers on, whose worship of ■ If the bosses say they can’t afford be paid by the bosses. the market has brought the country to to pay for workers’ wages, we say: its knees. ■ For safe work or full pay. Any open up the books! Let the working lockdown or restrictions must be ac- class and the labour movement see ■ No trust or confidence in the Tories companied by measures to provide the accounts! If firms plead bank- and their big business backers! for workers affected by closures. ruptcy, they should not be bailed ■ Instead of attacking the left, Labour This means 100% wage support for out, but nationalised under workers’ must provide genuine opposition to those furloughed, as well as full sick control. this shambolic Tory government. pay to those required to isolate. ■ No to austerity! The working class Support workers in the fight to put ■ To fight job cuts and the threat of must not pay for this crisis! lives before profits! mass unemployment following the It is clear that the market has failed The bosses and their craven political lockdown, work should be shared and capitalism is in a deep crisis. The representatives have shown that they out without any loss of pay, in order anarchy of capitalism prevents the will always prioritise profits over to lower the hours of the working planning of society’s resources, in lives. We demand socialist measures day. Britain and internationally. to protect workers, and put health ■ Scrap tuition fees and rents, and before wealth. ■ We therefore stand for the nation- replace these with free education alisation of the 100 biggest monop- ■ For a fully publicly-owned and free and full maintenance grants for all. olies, banks, utilities, landlords and health service, under workers’ Move university courses online. And so on – under workers’ control and control and management. Reverse put staff in control in schools and management – and without com- all privatisation and outsourcing. universities. pensation. On this basis, the econ- All private health services must be ■ Ban evictions and cancel housing omy can be democratically planned nationalised without compensation, debts. Give local authorities the in the interests of the majority, and and integrated into the NHS. power to cap rents at affordable lev- not for the super profits of a few. ■ For a properly funded test and trace els. Requisition rooms at hotels and ■ A Socialist Federation of Britain system, fully under public control. hostels for those sleeping on the should be linked to a Socialist Unit- Boot out parasitic outsourcing com- streets. And bring empty properties ed States of Europe and a World panies like SERCO, and give power and the assets of the big landlords Socialist Federation, in order to plan to healthcare workers, councils, and management companies under resources internationally for the and local communities in order to public control. benefit of all. This would put an end provide mass testing. ■ Many small businesses are faced to barbarism of capitalism and allow ■ Nationalise the pharmaceutical with bankruptcy, with banks resist- humanity to begin solving the urgent companies – without compensation ing any extensions of credit. Many issues of climate change, disease, – in order to ensure that vaccines are squeezed not only by the banks, and poverty that face society and are developed rapidly and made but by the big monopolies. By na- our planet. available to all for free. tionalising the banks we can supply these small businesses with the ■ Reverse the austerity inflicted upon lifeline of guaranteed low-interest public services. Launch a fully-fund- credit and loans. Like what you read? ed training programme for doctors, nurses, paramedics, medical ■ The financial resources required to JOIN US TODAY! staff, with decent pay and hours, fight the crisis must not come from to increase staffing levels across increased taxes or more austerity, [email protected] the board. New hospitals must be but through the nationalisation of the urgently built. banks and finance houses. Rather socialist-appeal than a ‘wealth tax’, we call for the ■ Non-essential workplaces should expropriation of the monopolies. be shut down until it is genuinely socialist.net safe to reopen. The decision to ■ Instead of building up the national SOCIALIST APPEAL Editor: Rob Sewell Content/Layout: Left Publications LTD [email protected] Khaled Malachi and Victoria Walder [email protected] Next issue date: Queries: Issue 344, March 2021 31st March 2021 [email protected] CONTENTS Britain 4 NHS pay 5-6 Black Lives Matter 7 Brexit Britain 8 SNP splits and scandals 9 Yemen blighted by British imperialism 10 Proportional representation 11 Marxist Student Federation Labour Party and Editorial 12-13 Recall conference campaign 14-15 Editorial Theory 16-19 150 years since the Paris Commune International 20-21 Myanmar 22 Senegal 23 Hong Kong repression Letters, Reviews and History 24 Review: Judas and the Black Messiah 25 Review: Adam Curtis documentary 26 Adverts 27 Letters 28 Tell the Truth: East India Company Trade Unions 29 Schools reopening 30 Unison NEC elections 31 Bus drivers’ strike Join us today! marxist.com 4 NHS Pay 10 March 2021 tories offer crumbs for nhs staff pay our nurses now! no to wage cuts! Dan Langley shown that the desperate need for massive workers. Tory ministers point to a public investment and expansion. sector pay freeze as evidence that the Royal College of Nursing This means further misery and pres- cupboard is bare, and that demands by sure on those working in the already over- nurses for more than 1% are unreason- (personal capacity) stretched NHS, as well as those who rely able. on these vital services. But the reality is that our demands – e’ve given as much as we can.” Official papers show that the govern- for a 12.5% increase – are more than rea- These were the contemptuous ment had already factored in a bigger sonable. For starters, our pay has fallen “Wwords of Boris Johnson, com- NHS pay rise of 2.1%. This was agreed in by over 12% in real terms over the past menting on the derisory 1% pay ‘rise’ on 2018, and enshrined in parliamentary law decade. At the same time, there seems offer to nurses and NHS staff. in 2020. to be plenty of money when it comes to Health workers and the wider public This shows that workers cannot rely on the bosses and billionaires, who have are rightly disgusted by this insulting offer negotiated agreements and legal protec- increased their already-vast fortunes and – a wage cut, in real terms – to those who tions. The ruling class will always change profits throughout the pandemic. have sacrificed so much throughout the the rules when it suits them. We must We must therefore stand firm, aim our pandemic. The Prime Minister’s words only therefore fight to make our voices heard sights higher, and look to smash through added fuel to the fire. and secure our demands. the public sector pay freeze all together. Now the Tories are facing a backlash This means uniting with public sector of anger. Unions are demanding a proper Burnt out workers across the board to demand a pay increase, warning of an even greater In response to this latest pay offer, nurses decent wage for all. exodus of nurses if this isn’t brought in. organised in the Royal College of Nursing Even some Conservative MPs have (RCN) were soon demanding strike action. Strength in unity come out against the government on this There have always been worries in The Tories have thrown down the gaunt- issue. And no wonder – according to recent the nursing community about how the let. The trade union leaders must answer polling, 58% of Tory voters believe that public may react to a strike. An Opinium this with swift and decisive action. NHS workers deserve more; a figure that poll from 6 March, however, showed that Nurses must not be left to fight on rises to 72% amongst the general public. a majority (51%) would support a strike their own. Instead, a strike by nurses by nurses. must be seen as a spark for coordinat- Corruption and crumbs Over the last year, the public and ed and militant action across the trade This NHS pay offer comes on the back of patients have learned how vital it is for unions. Rishi Sunak’s recent Budget. In it, the Tory everyone that NHS workers receive a The TUC should be organising and government allocated a further £22 billion decent wage; that staffing levels are safe; mobilising workers for a public sector wide to the privatised and failed test-and-trace that we have the necessary PPE; and strike. And grassroots activists in the labour system. that nurses have access to bursaries. movement should be passing motions of This is just one of many examples of These things benefit us all collectively. solidarity with the nurses and NHS work- how this government of the rich has used When we are short-staffed, demoralised, ers, to put pressure on the Labour leaders the coronavirus crisis to siphon off public and burnt out, it is not possible to provide and ensure that they support this struggle.
Recommended publications
  • Inside the Political Market
    Notes Preface and Acknowledgements 1 Priestley, 1968. Reviewing a book on the latest American campaign tech- niques the same year, Labour agent Terry Pitt warned colleagues that politi- cians ‘will be promoted and marketed like the latest model automobile’ (Labour Organiser no. 558, December). 2 Palast, 2002, p. 161–69. 3 Editorial in The Observer, 18th August 1996. 4 The speech was made to the pro-business Institute of Directors, ‘Mandelson: We sold Labour as news product’, The Guardian, 30th April 1998. 5 Hughes and Wintour, 1990; Gould, 1998. 6 Cockett, 1994. Introduction: Inside the Political Market 1 Coates, 1980; Minkin, 1980; Warde, 1982. 2 Hare, 1993; ‘Top Consumer PR Campaigns of All Time’, PR Week 29th March 2002. Of the other politicians featured the Suffragettes and Conservatives (1979) occupied the fifteenth and sixteenth places respec- tively. 3 Gould, 2002; Gould, 1998, p. 81. 4 Abrams and Rose with Hinden, 1960; Gould, 2002. 5 Mandelson and Liddle, 1996, p. 2; see also Wright, 1997. The Blair leader- ship, like most politicians, deny the extent to which they rely on profes- sionals for strategic input and guidance (Mauser, 1989). 6 Interviewed on BBC1 ‘Breakfast with Frost’, 14th January 1996, cited in Blair, 1996, p. 49. Blair regularly returns to this theme: in his 2003 Conference speech he attacked the interpretation of ‘New Labour’ as ‘a clever piece of marketing, good at winning elections, but hollow where the heart should be’ (The Guardian, 1st October 2003). 7 Driver and Martell, 1998, pp. 158–9. 8 Crompton and Lamb, 1986, p. 1. 9 Almond, 1990, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Results Elected Members
    Results and Elected Members Second edition based on official statistics where available 13 JuLy, 1989 PE 133.341 C 0 N T E N T S Electorate and turnout in the 12 . 1 Great Britain . 2 Northern Ireland . 3 Great Britain constituency results .................................... 4 Ireland constituency results .......................................... 14 Belgium ............................................................... 16 Denmark ............................................................... 18 France ................................................................ 20 Germany . 22 Greece ................................................................ 24 Ireland ............................................................... 26 Italy ................................................................. 28 Luxembourg . 31 Netherlands ........................................................... 33 Portugal .............................................................. 35 Spain ......................... : . ...................................... 37 United Kingdom ........................................................ 39 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS Electorate and turnout in EC states in 1979, 1984 and 1989 Country Electorate Turnout V\J.lid votes Belgium 1989 7,096,273 90.7 5,899,285 1984 6,975,677 92.2 5,725,837 1979 6,800,584 91.4 5,442,867 Denmark 1989 3,923,549 46.2 1,789,395 1984 3,878,600 52.4 2,001,875 1979 3,754,423 47.8 1,754,350 France 1989 38,348,191 48.7 18,145,588 1984 36,880,688 56.7 20,180,934 1979 35,180,531 60.7 20,242,347 Germany 1989 45,773,179 62.3 28,206,690 1984 44,451,981 56.8 24,851,371 1979 42,751,940 65.7 27,847,109 Greece 1989 8,347.387 79.9 6,544,669 1984 7,790,309 77.2 5,956,060 1981 7,319,070 78.6 5,753,478 Ireland 1989 2,453,451 68.3 1,632, 728 1984 2,413,404 47.6 1,l20,-ll6 1979 2,188, 798 63.6 1 '339.
    [Show full text]
  • In Perspective: Tom Nairn
    In perspective: Tom Nairn NEIL DAVIDSON The 1960s saw an upsurge of separatist nationalisms at the core of the capitalist system, with the movements in Catalonia, Eskudai, Occitania, Quebec, Scotland, Wallonia and Wales all making their first serious impact during that decade. Nationalist demands went on to play a role-—although by no means the most important role--in the social upheavals which shook the capitalist system between 1968 and 1976. And although none of them succeeded in establishing new states, several--Catalonia, Quebec and, more recently, Scotland--gained a significant degree of formal autonomy within the state framework of the dominant nation. These events inspired a number of important studies of nationalism, the majority of which appeared in two clusters. The first appeared between 1977 and 1982 and the second between 1989 and 1992, following a further and, in terms of establishing new states, more successful revival of nationalist aspiration in Eastern Europe. Whatever criticisms might be levelled at these works the best have nevertheless helped to advance our understanding of the phenomenon in important, if partial, ways.1 Only a minority of these studies approached the question from an avowedly Marxist perspective. One of them was by the Scottish writer Tom Nairn, who is regarded by many as the foremost modern theoretician of the subject. It is ironic, therefore, that his contribution emphasised the supposed inadequacy of the Marxist tradition as a tool for understanding nationalism, persuading many on the left that, in the famous opening sentence of one key essay, 'The theory of nationalism is Marxism's greatest historical failure'.2 Most of the essays in which he put forward these arguments were collected in a book first published in 1977 called The Break- Up of Britain, but Nairn has recently returned to the subject in a further collection of essays called Faces Of Nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Ag/S4/12/33 Parliamentary Bureau Agenda for Meeting
    AG/S4/12/33 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU AGENDA FOR MEETING ON TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012 9.00 am: Room Q1.03 Minutes 1. (a) Draft minutes of 20 November 2012 (attached) (b) Matters arising 2. Future business programme (PB/S4/12/255) 3. Removal of motions (PB/S4/12/256) 4. Legislation (a) Legislative Consent Memorandum - Marine Navigation (PB/S4/12/257) (No. 2) Bill (b) Public Bodies Act Consent Memorandum – Public (PB/S4/12/258) Bodies (Abolition of British Shipbuilders) Order [2013] 5. Bills from reports of the Scottish Law Commission (PB/S4/12/259) 6. Publication scheme – consideration of any exempt papers 7. Date of next meeting – Tuesday 4 December 2012 PB/S4/12/255 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU POSSIBLE MOTIONS FOR MEMBERS’ BUSINESS 1. Bureau Members will be aware that under Rule 5.6.1(c) the Bureau has a duty to ensure that there is a period of time available for Members’ Business following Decision Time. 2. Motions submitted for Members’ Business are shown below. S4M-02899# Christine Grahame: A Scottish Media Panel—That the Parliament would welcome a panel of experts to provide advice to ministers on Scotland’s media industry to help identify a strategy and direction, to help enable stability and growth and ensure that there is no democratic deficit in reporting on the Parliament and politics at what it considers this most important time of social and political change in the Scottish Borders, Midlothian and elsewhere in Scotland; while acknowledging that this is a time of financial restraint, believes that funding such a panel would have longer-term benefits for both the industry and democracy, and understands that such a proposal is currently under consideration by the Welsh Assembly Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995) Scotland’S Parliament: Scotland’S Right (Edinburgh: Convention of Scottish Local Authorities)
    Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995) Scotland’s Parliament: Scotland’s Right (Edinburgh: Convention of Scottish Local Authorities) [note from Paul Cairney: this is a PDF of the copy/pasted text from the SCC’s no-longer- there webpage] Welcome to the new Home page of the Scottish Constitutional Convention. This site has been setup to co-incide with the launch of its new report to the Scottish People, the site has a feedback facility to enable you to send in your comments to us, also included are links to other relevant sites. http://www.almac.co.uk/business_park/scc/ Joint Chairs: Lord Ewing of Kirkford Rt. Hon. Sir David Steel MP Chair of Executive Committee: Canon Kenyon Wright SCOTTISH CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Formation of the Scottish Constitutional Convention The proposal to establish a Constitutional Convention came from a committee of prominent Scots who in July 1988 in their report "A Claim of Right for Scotland" recommended that a Convention should be established to draw up a scheme for a Scottish Assembly or Parliament. The Committee itself was created following the result of the 1987 General Election as they believed action had to be taken on the way Scotland was governed. The Committee met between January and June of 1988, chaired by Professor Sir Robert Grieve with a former senior Scottish Office civil servant Jim Ross as secretary. In January 1989 a cross party meeting was held to consider proposals for a Convention at which the Scottish National Party expressed their reservations concerning a Convention and later withdrew. The Conservative Party had already made it clear they would take no part in the proposed Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicola Sturgeon (SNP) Click to Return
    Scottish Voting Results Scottish Results 2016 1. Aberdeen Central 25. Dundee City East 51. Inverness and Nairn 60 2. Aberdeen Donside 26. Dundee City West 52. Kilmarnock and 3. Aberdeen South and North 27. Dunfermline Irvine Valley Kincardine 28. East Kilbride 53. Kirkcaldy 13 4. Aberdeenshire East 29. East Lothian 54. Linlithgow 5. Aberdeenshire West 30. Eastwood 55. Mid Fife and Glenrothes 62 69 6. Airdrie and Shotts 31. Edinburgh Central 56. Midlothian North & 7. Almond Valley 32. Edinburgh Eastern Musselburgh 8. Angus North and Mearns 33. Edinburgh Northern and Leith 57. Midlothian South, 9. Angus South 34. Edinburgh Pentlands Tweeddale and Lauderdale 12 10. Argyll and Bute 35. Edinburgh Southern 58. Moray 58 11. Ayr 36. Edinburgh Western 59. Motherwell and Wishaw 4 12. Banffshire and Buchan 37. Ettrick, Roxburgh and 60. Na h-Eileanan an Iar 51 Coast Berwickshire 61. North East Fife 2 13. Caithness, Sutherland and 38. Falkirk East 62. Orkney Islands Ross 39. Falkirk West 63. Paisley 5 1 14. Carrick, Cumnock and 40. Galloway and West Dumfries 64. Perthshire North 70 Doon Valley 41. Glasgow Anniesland 65. Perthshire South and 3 15. Clackmannanshire and 42. Glasgow Cathcart Kinross-shire Dunblane 43. Glasgow Kelvin 66. Renfrewshire North and West 8 16. Clydebank and Milngavie 44. Glasgow Maryhill and 67. Renfrewshire South 9 17. Clydesdale Springburn 68. Rutherglen 64 18. Coatbridge and Chryston 45. Glasgow Pollok 69. Shetland Islands 19. Cowdenbeath 46. Glasgow Provan 70. Skye, Lochaber and 25 20. Cumbernauld and Kilsyth 47. Glasgow Shettleston Badenoch 71 21. Cunninghame North 48. Glasgow Southside 71. Stirling 10 65 61 22.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Leftreview
    ScottishLeft Review Issue 102 November/December 2017 - £2.00 'best re(a)d' ASLEF CALLS FOR AN INTEGRATED, PUBLICLY OWNED, ACCOUNTABLE RAILWAY FOR SCOTLAND (which used to be the SNP’s position – before they became the government!) Mick Whelan Tosh McDonald Kevin Lindsay General Secretary President Scottish Ocer ASLEF the train drivers union- www.aslef.org.uk Trade Union Recognition agreements on all construction sites Adherence to collective agreements Direct employment No blacklisting No public contracts for blacklisters No Bogus self employment or umbrella schemes Protect skills Proper apprenticeships The Rank & File was born out of an attack on the skills of electricians in 2011 by eight of the major mechanical and electrical construction companies in the UK. We have also been in the Health & Safety forefront in the fight against blacklisting with our partners, the Blacklist Support Group. We seek the adherence of collective agreements on all construction sites and recognition of all elected shop stewards and safety reps. The Rank & File, who is made up mostly of Unite members but Contact: also count members of GMB and Ucatt among our ranks, are determined to change the face of construction for the benefit of working people by transforming the attitudes of companies in the Email: [email protected] industry to realise the benefits of having an organised workforce. To do this we need the assistance of clients such as the Scottish government, local authorities, NHS and Scotland’s Universities and Colleges through their procurement processes, in line with the Scottish Unite Scottish Rank and File government’s Fair Work Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour in Brighton
    L a n r u o ASLEFThe ASSOCIATED SOCIETY of LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS & FIREMEN J NOVEMBER 2017 Power to the people – Labour in Brighton The train drivers ’ union since 1880 railway enginemen’s tax free saver plans tax free savings plans for Resource Managers, Roster Clerks, Driver Assessoors, Driver TTeameam Managers, Customer Service AssistantAssistants,ts, Driver Instructors, Drivers, Customer Service Managers,gers, TTrainrain Managers, Conductors, Retail Sales Managers,s, First Class Hosts, On Board Cleaners, Controllers, GGuards, Revenue Protection Inspectors & Senior Conductorrs and anyone we’ve missed out who works on the railways or for train operating companies! for further information call uus on freephone 08800 328 9140 visit our website at www.ennginemens.co.ukk or write to us at Railway Enginemeen's Assurance Society Limited, 727 WWashwoodashwood Heath Road, BirmBirmingham,mingham, B8 2LE @RailwayEnginemens Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Incorporated under the Friendly Societies Act 19922 L 7 a 1 0 2 n R E r B M u E V o O J Published by the AASLEFSSOCIATED SOCIETY of LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS & FIREMEN N Mick: ‘Comments at the Conservative conference raise more questions than answers’ No scab force here 5 7 UCH has been made of recent comments made in or around the Tory M Party conference in relation to rail, particularly in the media. But they raised more News questions than answers. The announcement of £300 million for connectivity from the Trans TfL axes plan to upgrade Tube lines 4 Pennine region to HS2, for example.
    [Show full text]