O Ammonium Nitrate, Urea, GSSP, Ammonium Fluoride, Nitric Acid at Po PPL Township District Jagatsinghpur (Odisha) by P
Query 1: Considering air quality of the region, comments of SPCB to allow the proposed expansion of fertilizer plant. Reply: SPCB Comments to allow the proposed expansion of fertilizer plant has been received vide letter no. 2783/IND-II-NOC-MISC-182 Dated 11.03.2020 (attached as Annexure I). Letter states OParadeep area is coming under Severely Polluted Area (SPA). The MoEF&CC Govt of India Vide O.M No. F.No. 22-23/2018-IA.III(Pt) dtd. 31st October 2019 has formulated a mechanism for environmental management of critically and severely polluted areas and cons ! "" # " R# %&' O.A No 1038/2018. In view of the above the MoEF&CC, Govt. of India may consider for grant of Environmental Clearance to expansion proposal of M/s. Paradeep Phosphate Ltd., Paradeep based on the above air quality of the area as well as mechanism formulated for Severely Polluted Area (SPA).
Query 2: Additional one-month baseline data for the air quality. Reply: Additional one-month ambient air quality baseline data was carried out for month of March 2019 by Sun consultancy and Services an NABL Approved lab. Details of the data is as mentioned below. Analysis report is attached as Annexure II. Table: Ambient Air quality Data 3 3 3 3 3 3 PM10 µg/m PM2.5 µg/m SO2 µg/m NOx µg/m NH3 µg/m CO mg/m Sr.No Min Min Min Min Min Min Max Max Max Max Max Max 98%tile 98%tile 98%tile 98%tile 98%tile 98%tile Location name Location code Location code 1. A1 Project Site 74 92 92 34 50 49 13.2 19.6 19.5 30.0 42.8 42.6 18 27 27 0.73 0.94 0.94 2. A2 PPL township 72 85 85 33 48 48 10.2 18.6 18.5 22.8 39.6 39.4 16 24 24 0.57 0.88 0.87 3. A3 Chaulipalanda 68 82 82 36 52 52 14.8 20.6 20.3 31.2 42.8 42.2 20 32 32 0.74 0.90 0.90 4. A4 Gopinath 76 90 89 40 48 48 11.4 16.8 16.5 25.0 35.8 35.2 16 24 24 0.63 0.98 0.98 Colony 5. A5 Udayabata 77 93 93 40 52 52 16.0 19.2 19.1 33.6 40.8 40.5 22 31 31 0.56 0.86 0.85 6. A6 Paradeepgarh 80 94 94 38 46 46 14.2 21.6 21.4 32.5 44.0 43.7 15 26 26 0.90 0.99 0.99 7. A7 Musadiha 72 86 86 36 44 44 10.4 15.2 15.1 22.9 32.5 32.4 30 43 42 0.60 0.97 0.97 8. A8 Jogidhankud 64 78 78 32 40 40 9.4 17.4 17.2 20.8 36.8 36.5 17 24 24 0.62 0.89 0.89
Sr.No Location Location name CH4 mg/Nm3 Non Methane HF mg/m3 code mg/Nm3 1. A1 Project Site <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 2. A2 PPL township <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 3. A3 Chaulipalanda <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 4. A4 Gopinath Colony <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 5. A5 Udayabata <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 6. A6 Paradeepgarh <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 7. A7 Musadiha <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 8. A8 Jogidhankud <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 O Ammonium Nitrate, Urea, GSSP, Ammonium Fluoride, Nitric Acid at Po PPL Township District Jagatsinghpur (Odisha) by P
As per the above result it can be observed that 1. For PM10: 98%tile in the study area ranges from 78 to 94 µg/m3. Min concentration in the study area was observed to be 64 µg/m3 and max. observed value is 94 µg/m3. 2. For PM2.5: 98%tile in the study area ranges from 40 to 52 µg/m3. Min concentration in the study area was observed to be 32 µg/m3 and max. observed value is 52 µg/m3. 3. For SO2: 98%tile in the study area ranges from 15.1 to 21.4 µg/m3. Min concentration in the study area was observed to be 9.4 µg/m3 and max. observed value is 21.6 µg/m3. 4. For NO2: 98%tile in the study area ranges from 32.4 to 43.7 µg/m3. Min concentration in the study area was observed to be 20.8 µg/m3 and max. observed value is 44 µg/m3. 5. For NH3: 98%tile in the study area ranges from 24 to 42 µg/m3. Min concentration in the study area was observed to be 15 µg/m3 and max. observed value is 43 µg/m3. 6. For CO: 98%tile in the study area ranges from 0.85 to 0.99 mg/m3. Min concentration in the study area was observed to be 0.56 mg/m3 and max. observed value is 0.99 mg/m3. 7. Methane, Non Methane and HF concentration in the study area was observed to be below detection limit of 0.5, 0.1 and 0.1 mg/Nm3 respectively.
The monitoring results shows the highest PM10, SO2, NO2 and CO value at A6 (Paradeepgarh) location. However though compared to other location the A6 values were higher they were observed to be within the NAAQS limit. The monitoring results of the March 2019 were observed to be within the NAAQS values.
Query 3: Complete details of different existing and the proposed products. Reply: Complete list of existing and proposed products with total Quantity is as mentioned below in the table Quantity in MMTPA Sl.No. Products Details Existing Quantity Expansion Quantity Proposed Quantity Total Quantity 1. Sulphuric acid 1.452 - - 1.452 2. Phosphoric acid 0.462 - - 0.462 0.4 Di-Ammonium (capacity expansion of 3. 1.5 - 1.9 Phosphates existing 4 DAP plants) 4. Coal Hand. Plant - - 7 7 5. Ammonia - - 2.178 2.178 6. Urea - 1.3 1.3 7. Ammonium Nitrate - - 0.35 0.35 MMTPA 0.33 (0.05 MMTPA 0.33 (0.05 MMTPA 8. Nitric Acid - - Conc. Nit. Acid) Conc. Nit. Acid) Granulated Single 9. Super Phosphates - - 0.5 0.5 (GSSP) 10. Aluminium Fluoride - - 9500 9500 O Ammonium Nitrate, Urea, GSSP, Ammonium Fluoride, Nitric Acid at Po PPL Township District Jagatsinghpur (Odisha) by P
Query 4: Compliance status of the conditions in the EC dated 5th October, 2010 forwarded by the concerned Regional Office of the Ministry. Reply: Certified RO compliance issued on dated 13.11.2017 is attached as Annexure III. Compliance of the action taken on the observation report of 13.11.2017 were submitted on the 11.12.2017 (attached as Annexure IV)
Query 5: Revised water balance plan with reduction in freshwater requirement by 20%, and the detailed effluent management plan to achieve ZLD. Reply: As per revised water balance plan the fresh water requirement for the proposed Expansion proposal shall be 843 m3/hr (21% less than the original proposed) instead of originally proposed 1063.97 m3/hr. Details of the revised water balance plan along with effluent management plan to achieve ZLD is attached as Annexure V. Below is the comparative chart showing the original and revised water budgeting for proposed expansion. Sr. Particulars Original Proposal As per revision Source Remarks No (m3/hr) (m3/hr) 1. Total Water Requirement 1800.43 1474 Fresh and 18 % Recycle water reduction 2. Fresh Water Requirement 1063.97 843 River (Taladanda 21% Canal) reduction Query 6: Emission management plan and details of pollution control measures to achieve 99.9% emissions control. Reply: To reduce the emission concentration from the proposed project, the proposal has been revised. As per revised proposal, the WHRU/Auxiliary Boiler which was initially proposed is now removed from the proposal. However, to manage the steam requirement we propose to increase the LP Steam generation capacity from 55 Ton to 90 Ton of existing Turbine by reducing the extraction pressure from 10.5 bar to 3 bar by replacing the turbine. After this change there shall be no requirement of auxiliary boiler in the proposed expansion. As well Prilling tower stack design with respect to Stack height and Dia has been revised. Along with this adequate APCS are proposed to control the emission. Details of the plant wise APCS proposed as part of emission management plan is as mentioned in Table 1. Comparative table showing revision in emission load due to removal of auxiliary boiler, revising of Prilling Tower stack height and Dia, and emission management plan proposed is as shown in Table 2. As per revised emission load, air dispersion modeling was carried out to predict the 24hr ground level concentration of the pollutants. Comparison of Max 24hr GLC is shown in Table 3. O Ammonium Nitrate, Urea, GSSP, Ammonium Fluoride, Nitric Acid at Po PPL Township District Jagatsinghpur (Odisha) by P
Table 1: Emission Management Plan Sl.No. Plant 1 Di-Ammonium Cyclones, Pre-Scrubber, RG (Fumes) To control dust emission & Phosphate Scrubber, upgraded Mist Eliminators, gaseous emission. Ventury scrubbers, upgraded fumes scrubber & fan, Upgraded Tail Gas Scrubber, Upgraded Dryer and Dust Scrubber, Upgraded Cooler Gas Scrubber, Upgraded Pre-Neutralizer. Online Ammonia Analyzers. 2 Coal handling Dry fog / ADS (Agglomerative dust To control dust emission suppression) & Bag filter systems 3 /4 ' !( ) #! *+ , ! -" ' Ammonia / Urea !- ) ' ! " ' . *! 5 Ammonium Nitrate Scrubbers (Vapor & Drying) To control dust & gaseous emission 6 Nitric acid Additional tail gas treatment system, Tail gas To control gaseous (NOx) ammonia mixer and tail gas reactor emission 7 Granulated Single Venturi scrubbing followed by efficient wet To control fumes and gaseous Super Phosphates scrubbing, Granulator scrubber, Bag filter, emission (GSSP) fluorine scrubber 8 Aluminum Fluoride Cyclones, Scrubbers. To control fumes, Dust and gaseous emission O ! % - & Ammonium Fluoride, Nitric Acid at Po PPL Township District Jagatsinghpur (Odisha) by P
Table 2: Comparative Stack Emission Details
SL.N Stack As per Initial proposal Revised Proposal Emission Load (kghr) Emission Load (kghr) Stack Stack Velocity PM SO2 NOx F NH3 Stack Stack Velocity PM SO2 NOx F NH3 Height Dia. (m/s) Height Dia. (m/s) 1 WHRU / Auxiliary Boiler 30 5.5 16.25 19.9 66.2 66.2 NA NA Not proposed 2 Sulphur Recovery Unit 30 0.6 20.20 NA 0.8 NA NA NA 30 0.6 20.20 NA 0.8 NA NA NA 3 Urea PT 130 30 0.76 75.0 NA NA NA 225.00 136 20 0.71 31.3 NA NA NA 31.3 4 Nitric Acid 50 1.25 44.76 NA NA 56.8 NA NA 50 1.25 44.76 NA NA 56.8 NA NA 5 Ammonium Nitrate 40 1.8 17.18 13.50 NA NA NA 20.5 40 1.8 17.18 6.75 NA NA NA 6.75 14.4 6 DAP-A 50 2.8 16.13 14.47 NA NA 1.45 14.47 50 2.8 16.13 14.47 NA NA 1.45 7 14.4 7 DAP-B 50 2.8 16.13 14.47 NA NA 1.45 14.47 50 2.8 16.13 14.47 NA NA 1.45 7 14.4 8 DAP-C 50 2.8 16.13 14.47 NA NA 1.45 14.47 50 2.8 16.13 14.47 NA NA 1.45 7 14.4 9 DAP-D 50 2.8 16.13 14.47 NA NA 1.45 14.47 50 2.8 16.13 14.47 NA NA 1.45 7 10 GSSP Ball Mill 40 0.8 15.21 2.4 NA NA NA NA 40 0.8 15.21 1.2 NA NA NA NA 11 GSSP Scrubber Outlet 40 1.0 12.74 3.1 NA NA 0.63 NA 40 1.0 12.74 1.6 NA NA 0.63 NA 12 GSSPNHot Air Generator 30 0.6 21.28 1.25 6.19 1.25 0.31 NA 30 0.6 21.28 0.62 2.16 1.25 0.25 NA 13 Aluminium Flouride 30 0.25 22.65 NA NA NA 0.01 NA 30 0.25 22.65 NA NA NA 0.01 NA Table 3: Comparative Max 24hr GLC
Concentration (µg/m3) Description PM10 PM2.5 SOx NOx NH3 HF Initial Revised Initial Revised Initial Revised Initial Revised Initial Revised Initial Revised Maximum Rise in GLC 74.76 21.7 30.04 8.67 24.46 4.002 31.22 3.30 311.38 8.59 27.95 4.632 Percentage Reduction 71.0% 71.1% 83.6% 89.4% 97.2% 83.4% O Ammonium Nitrate, Urea, GSSP, Ammonium Fluoride, Nitric Acid at Po PPL Township District Jagatsinghpur (Odisha) by P
Query 7: Safety and risk assessment with advanced models. Reply: Safety and Risk assessment with advance model has been initiated as per W.O dated 25.02.2020 (Annexure VI). We hereby agree to follow the recommendation that will be given from the assessment.
Query 8: Details of Corporate Environment Responsibility during last 5 years and the proposal to cater to the proposed expansion. Reply: During the Last 5 years the company has done the CER of 572.91 lacs. Details of the expenditure activity wise is attached as Annexure VII. The project cost of the proposed expansion is 9459 crores. Project Cost being >1000 crores and < 10,000 crores and brownfield project applicable CER as per MoEF&CC OM dated 1st May 2018 shall be 27.64 Crores. We proposed CER of 27.65 crores to be carried out in period of 7 years. As per census 2011 Total population in 2 km area of the project site is 632 nos. With almost equal male to female ratio. Out of total population around 20% population belongs to SC/ST. Literacy rate of the area is observed to be 72%. Male literacy rate was observed to be 77% male literate while female literacy rate is 67%. O Ammonium Nitrate, Urea, GSSP, Ammonium Fluoride, Nitric Acid at Po PPL Township District Jagatsinghpur (Odisha) by P
Total employment rate in 2 km area including various main and marginal worker categories is 68%. In term of Educational facilities in 2 km area there is only 1 no. of primary school and no secondary or senior secondary school. In term of medical facilities in 2 km area there is no availability of facility like primary health center, primary health center, maternity and child welfare center, Hospital and Dispensary as well family welfare center. During Public hearing the major focus/demand was on Employment generation to locals Support to locals for business development, fisheries business and poor merits students for higher studies. Educational initiative to local farmers for increase crop yield. Construction of anicut, overbridged near PPL railway gate, Super Specialty Hospital, road development connecting to Siju village to PPL Plantation program. Based on the above it can be observed that in the 2 km of the area from project site There is a need for steps to be taken for encouraging women education Steps for local employment generation and supporting local business. Steps for provision of higher education and medical facilities in the area. Construction of infrastructure facilities in the area like road development, drinking water facility development. Initiation of plantation program.
Accordingly, CER activity for the proposed expansion is proposed to be carried out after getting Environmental clearance is as mentioned below:
Sr. No Proposed CER
1. Infrastructural development 2. Educational and Skill Development 3. Healthcare Facility 4. Plantation and Energy Conservation (Renewable energy) 5. Support to local farmer 6. Other local need ANNEXURE-I
ANNEXURE II
ANNEXURE-III
ANNEXURE IV Compliance status of observations dated 27.04.2017 relating to Environmental Clearance No-J-11011/370/2008-IA. II (I) dated 05.10.2010. Sl. No Observation Points Compliance Status It is required to conduct third party analysis of various Third party analysis of various parameters parameters by NABL or MoEF &CC accredited by NABL accredited laboratory is being 1 laboratory on regular basis. done on regular basis. Analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1.
It has been found that the safety measures are not up to PPL is committed to highest safety standard the mark including emergency awareness among the for its workers and work place. Safety workers working specially security guard. PAs are training and awareness Programmes are storing three to four nos of gas cutter/ welding machine being conducted for security personnel on with gas cylinders near ammonia storage tank. In regular basis. Some photographs of the same addition to above, various workers are found working are enclosed as Annexure-2. 2 without required PPEs in packing gypsum area. No gas cutter / welding machine with gas cylinders are allowed inside the Ammonia tank area. However, area is free from the above & strictly prohibited for the same. Workers are using PPEs in packing gypsum area.
It has been found that PAs are storing gypsum in open Based on the process design, gypsum slurry is area without taking any precaution. Management of pumped from Phosphoric Acid plant to gypsum storage area /gypsum pond is very poor. gypsum pond and dry gypsum is stored at same site. Gypsum pond / Gypsum storage 3 area is managed by dedicated team with necessary precautions. However, new gypsum pond is under construction for storing gypsum based on the CPCB guideline.
As stated by the project authorities the average Gypsum dumping/storage area is designed as ground water table in the project area is 2 to 3 per CPCB guideline. There is no chance of meters below ground level. During rainy seasons submerge of gypsum dumping/storage area almost all open area are submerged including during rainy season and there is no gypsum dumping/ storage area etc. However, probability of contamination of U-238 and probability of ground water contamination with U- Ra-226 to ground water. However, we are monitoring U-238 and 4 238 and Ra-226 and gypsum may be more. Therefore, it is requested to conduct / submit third Ra-226 in phosphogypsum on regular party analysis of ground water quality including U- basis which conforms the standard of 238 and Ra-226 on regular basis and also comply AERB. with the recommendation of NEERI in light of Report of the same is being sent to your CPCB guideline for dumping/storage of gypsum. good office on quarterly basis. Pl. refer the last report as Annexure-3
As stated by the project authorities the piezometer We have consulted the party for installation is not compatible for the measurement of phosphate of piezometer well. and fluoride; however, the project authorities are monitoring ground water quality manually. 5 Therefore, it is requested to install piezometer well as per guidelines of CPCB. If any exemption direction issued by Zonal office, Kolkata or Head office of CPCB may kindly be submitted. It has been found that PAs have planted various fruit Shall be complied with as suggested. bearing plants in the core area of the plant, which may be susceptible for uptake and translocation of various pollutant emitted by the plant. Therefore, it is requested 6 to analyze the related pollutant in the fruit growing in the area before its consumption. It is also requested not to plant further fruit bearing plants in the core area of the factory. As stated by the project proponent, they are Treated water of ETP is being reused in recycling all the Gypsum pond water to process. the Ball Mill of PAP as suggested. Further Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) has been Treated water of STP is already being installed for treatment of waste water and the reused for green belt development. treated water is being utilized in plantation. Zero 7 discharge is adopted and no waste water is being discharged outside the premises. As per EC condition treated water of ETP is being reused in the Ball Mill of PAP. Ministry allow only treated STP water will be used for green belt development.
It has been found that PAs have not yet submitted the We are submitting the details of CSR detail of work and expenditure made under community expenses and activities to your good office development as CSR schemes. regularly during the six monthly compliance 8 report. Last report of the same is enclosed as Annexure-4
It has been found that PAs have not yet submitted the We are submitting the details of expenses details of work and expenditure made under and activities made under Environmental Environmental Protection measures Protection to your good office regularly 9 during the six monthly compliance report. Last report of the same is enclosed as Annexure-5
It has been found that PAs have not yet submitted We have already submitted newspaper newspaper advertisement information of the above EC. advertisement information of the EC to the 10 Regional office, Bhubaneswar vide our letter no PPL/EMD/05/2010/53 dated 11.10.2010. Please Refer Annexure- 6 It has been found that PAs have not yet setup the rain We will consult CGWA/CGWB for water harvesting pit in the factory premises due to very implementation of rain water harvesting in 11 upper side of water table. It is requested to consult PPL premises. CGWA/CGWB for its implementation. ANNEXURE V
Exisiting Water Balance
Figures in m3/Hr 776 585 191 TOTAL WATER
Industrial Domestic
651.6 Existing
66.6
191 Existing ETP STP
66.6 191
For Plant/gardening Proposed + Existing
Figures in m3/Hr 1619 1389 230 TOTAL WATER
Industrial Domestic
1474 651.6
Proposed Existing
66.6
230
Proposed ETP Existing ETP STP
670 66.6
230
For Plant/gardening PROPOSED WATER BALANCE FIGURES in m3/ hr
operational 10 DAP 10 0
operational 117 Urea 180 63
0 Amm. Nit 47 47
operational 10 Water Source GSSP 10 1474 0 55 CHP 70 15
evaporation 128 Nit. Acid 130 2
evaporation 3.84 ETP 670 Al. Flu. 6.6 2.76 480 evaporation Ammonia 1020 540 PROPOSED EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT (700 M3/hr)
PPL shall install and commission an Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) having capacity of 700 M3/hr for treatment of effluent generated from different process units. ETP shall be designed by NEERI, Nagpur.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION :
The combined effluent from process units of various sections passes through the effluent drains and shall be collected in the Central sump and pumped to Effluent Treatment Plant. The effluent shall pass through an Inlet chamber, bar screen, Grit Chamber and Oil & Grease trap prior to an Equalization Tank. The Equalization Tank shall be equipped with air diffusion system.
One dedicated facility for Lime solution preparation shall be available with screen chamber , Hoppers , belt conveyor , Bucket elevator, Screw conveyor and slurry preparation in Concentrated lime preparation Tanks , Lime Dosing Tanks, Lime Dosing Pumps and Control valves. Here the
Lime powder with 80 ~ 86% Ca(OH)2 shall be fed to the Conc. Lime Preparation Tank and Treated water added to make 20% Lime solution (approx). This 20% Lime solution shall be taken to Lime Dosing tanks and diluted to 10% (approx) by adding further quantity of Treated water.
Effluent from Equalization Tank shall be pumped to Flash Mixing Tank-1 where 10% lime solution will be added to raise the pH to 7 along with Polyelectrolyte as a coagulant and shall pass to Clariflocculator – 1. Supernatant of Clarifier 1 shall be passed to Flash Mixing Tank-2 for second stage of lime treatment and then to Clariflocculator – 2. Where the pH shall be raised to 10.5 by dosing further quantity of lime solution through Control valve-2. The final clarified overflow from Clarifier – 2 will be alkaline in nature with pH 10.5. pH of overflow water from Clariflocculator – 2 shall be corrected by adding sulphuric acid in pH Correction Tank where pH,phosphates,fluoride,TSS,TDS BOD,COD ,O&G shall be achieved as per CPCCB/OSPCB norms. Treated water will be used in ball mill of Phosphoric acid plant.
The Sludge from Clariflocculator – 1 and 2 shall be drained to Thickener and the thickened sludge will be pumped to Filter Press for dewatering. Sludge cakes from the Filter Press will be discharged to Sludge Storage Yard which shall be used in the DAP plant as a filler. Treated water quality shall be monitored by online pH meters. THEORY OF CHEMICAL TREATMENT
Chemistry of Phosphate Removal :
Phosphates will be removed from wastewater by precipitation as calcium salt using Calcium usually added in the form of lime i.e. Ca(OH)2. The primary reaction will be as follows,
2+ -3 3Ca + 2(PO4) Ca3(PO4)2 ------(A) When lime will added to water it will react with the phosphates to precipitate calcium phosphate Ca3(PO4)2. This reaction (A) will be expected as dominate in the first stage of treatment till pH 7.
However, the residual concentration of phosphates in water will be higher than discharge limits due to partial solubility of calcium phosphate at neutral pH range. Therefore second stage of phosphates removal at pH beyond 10 with lime will be envisaged where calcium ions will react with the residual phosphates to precipitate as hydroxylapatite Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, shall be governed by the reaction (B).
+2 -3 - 10Ca + 6PO4 + 2OH Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 ------(B) (Hydroxylapatite)
Chemistry of Fluoride Removal :
Calcium salts, including Ca(OH)2, CaSO4, and CaCl2 shall be used to precipitate fluorides as insoluble CaF2. The precipitation of fluoride using lime will be occurred as follows :
Ca(OH)2 + 2HF CaF2 + 2H2O ------(C)
stoichiometrically, the precipitation shall affect the reduction of fluoride levels to the limit of solubility of fluoride in the CaF2 system. But the equilibrium that shall affect the solubility of fluoride includes not only the CaF2 itself but also the species H2+F and HF-2 as well as the ion- pair CaF+. This results in presence of traces of fluoride after initial precipitation meriting a second stage of fluoride removal. The second stage shall affected by chemisorption of fluoride on calcium phosphate and by adsorption on hydroxylapatite. The presence of alkalinity and precipitable phosphates enhance the precipitation of fluoride in which the carbonate radical of the apatite complex, Ca(PO4)6.CaCO3, shall replace by fluoride to form an insoluble fluorapatite. Ca(PO4)6.CaCO3 + 2F- Ca(PO4)6.CaF2 + CO2-3 ------(D)
Ca(PO4)6 + 2CaF Ca(PO4)6.CaF2 ------(E) (Fluorapatite)
Since the precipitation of phosphate will be carried out simultaneously the process of co precipitation takes over in the second stage of treatment resulting in highly efficient removal of fluorides from wastewater. PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM OF EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT, PPL CAPACITY: 700 M3/Hr
AIR BLOWER
EFFLUENT
INLET BAR GRIT OIL & GREASE EQUALISATION TANK RAW EFFLUENT CHAMBER SCREEN CHAMBER TRAP TRANSFER PUMPS
LIME SOLUTION LIME SOLUTION
POLYELECTROLYTE POLY ELECTROLYTE
CLARIFLOCCULATOR-1 CLARIFLOCCULATOR-2 SLUDGE CLARIFIER OUTLET THICKENER WATER TO SLUDGE PH CORRECTION TANK SLUDGE FROM CLARIFLOCCULATORS SUMP SLUDGE TO FILTER PRESS
TO BE USED IN THE PLANT TO BE USED IN SLUDGE YARD DAP AS FILLER ANNEXURE VI ANNEXURE VII Past Five Years Expenditures for CSR Activities
FY 2014-15
Sl. No. CSR Project/activities Sector in which project Project location Amount Spent covered (In Lakhs) 1. Launch of Women Friendly Auto Bhubaneswar 6.51
2. Performance Bhubaneswar 1.66 Trust Bhubaneswar 3. Puri 0.82 4. Distribution of Sewing Machines Bhubaneswar 0.48 5. Community Development/Cultural Development in Urban Bhubaneswar 0.80 Areas Sub - Total 10.27 6. Community Mobilisation Paradeep 11.41 7. Education Paradeep 6.37 8. Health & Nutrition Paradeep 4.09 9. Water & Sanitation Paradeep Child Centric 21.68 10. Livelihood Paradeep Panchayat 8.29 11. Vocational Training Paradeep Initiative 3.24 12. Agriculture & Horticulture Paradeep Activities at 3.08 13. Biodiversity Paradeep Paradeep 23.49 14. Emergency & Calamities Paradeep 7.33 15. Impact Assessment - - 16. Administration & Supervision Paradeep 23.71 Sub - Total 112.87 17. Boundary Wall at U.N. Primary School Paradeep - 18. Water Tanker Support During Summer to 3 Gram- Paradeep 8.82 Panchayats Other Infra 19. Toilet Complex in Paradeepgarh Paradeep 8.80 Structure Works 20. Maintenance of Ekta Park at Jagatsinghpur Jagatsinghpur 1.44 at Paradeep 21. Supply of Life Jacket & Lifebuoy to Jagatsinghpur District Jagatsinghpur 1.25 Admin. 22. Drains in Bagadia and Mangarajpur Gram Panchayats Paradeep - Sub - Total 20.31 Grand Total 143.45
FY 2015-16
Sl. No. CSR Project/activities Sector in which project Project location Amount Spent covered (In Lakhs) 1. Puri 1.25
2. ! R ]C Bhubaneswar CSR at - ' R Bhubaneswar 3. Bhubaneswar 1.29 Trust Sub - Total 2.54 4. Community Mobilisation & Education Paradeep Child Centric 13.74 5. Health, Nutrition & Sanitation Paradeep Panchayat 22.58 6. Vocational Training Paradeep Initiative 3.01 7. Emergency & Calamities Paradeep Activities at - 8. Impact Assessment - Paradeep - Sub - Total 39.33 9. Swachh Vidyalaya Abhiyan Paradeep Other - 10. Maintenance of Ekta Park at Jagatsinghpur Jagatsinghpur Infrastructure 1.92 11. Overhead Paradeep Works at 3.77 Paradeep Sub - Total 5.69 Grand Total 47.56
FY 2016-17
Sl. No. CSR Project/activities Sector in which project Project location Amount Spent covered (In Lakhs) 1. Health & Nutrition Paradeep 2.75 2. Education, Training & Skill Building Paradeep 9.52
3. Water & Sanitation Paradeep 11.7 4. Supervision & Monitoring Paradeep 3.42 Sub - Total 27.39
FY 2017-18
Sl. No. CSR Project/activities Sector in which project Project location Amount Spent covered (In Lakhs) 1. Skill Development For Youth Paradeep 26.86 2. Livelihood Promotion For Marginalised Houses Paradeep 12.61 3. Education & Health Paradeep Plant Periphery 25.44 4. Water Sanitation & Hygiene Paradeep Villages At 17.31 5. Environment & Biodiversity Paradeep Paradeep 10.26 6. Village Community Infrastructure Development Paradeep 22.56 7. Emergency Relief Support to Poor in Case of Disaster Paradeep - Sub - Total 115.04 8. Women Empowerment Paradeep 4.2 9. Livelihood Promotion For Women & Youth Paradeep 5.91 10. Support For Household Energy Needs (Renewable Energy) Paradeep Urban Slum - 11. Support To Issue Of Aging Paradeep Around Plant, 0.6 12. Support to Children With No Parental Care Paradeep Paradeep 1.04 13. Sanitation & Hygiene Paradeep 20.42 14. Overhead Cost Paradeep 7.3 Sub - Total 39.47 Grand Total 154.51
FY 2018-19
Sl. No. CSR Project/activities Sector in which project Project location Amount Spent covered (In Lakhs) 1. Skill Development For Youth Paradeep 6.75 2. Livelihood Promotion For Marginalised Houses Paradeep 20.53 3. Education & Health Paradeep Plant Periphery 29.84 4. Water Sanitation & Hygiene Paradeep Villages At 27.89 5. Environment & Biodiversity Paradeep Paradeep 15.80 6. Village Community Infrastructure Development Paradeep 21.20 7. Emergency Relief Support to Poor in Case of Disaster Paradeep 1.26 Sub - Total 123.27 8. Women Empowerment Paradeep 1.09 9. Livelihood Promotion For Women & Youth Paradeep 6.94 10. Support For Household Energy Needs (Renewable Energy) Paradeep 0.00 Urban Slum 11. Community Development Initiatives Paradeep 26.49 Around Plant, 12. Skills Development, Livelihoods & Education Paradeep 7.08 Paradeep 13. Support to Oldage & Children With No Parental Care Paradeep 5.40 14. Helath, Sanitation & Hygiene Paradeep 21.20 15. Overhead Cost Paradeep 8.68 Sub - Total 76.88 Grand Total 200.15