Salford District
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Salford District Personal Details: Name: E-mail: Organisation Name: Comment text: Just pack it in changing things and have a councillor ratio to residents like they have a teacher to children ratio in nursery and schools. Obviously a bigger ward should have more councillors. Your just trying to save money again by f**king things up even more. You havn't even given people the option to post anonymously. That is how much you value the people. *Claps* Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded 6/28/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: We don't need 60 Councillors - 30 is more than enough. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13243 1/1 Salford District Personal Details: Name: text: I live in Irlam but have to vote for the Cadishead ward. It would be nice to vote for where I actually live. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded 7/2/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: The areas should correlate to other services for example those that health use or gmp Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13256 1/1 7/3/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Member of the public Comment text: Born and bred in Salford (1965) and having lived all my life in Salford and Broughton : Higher Broughton (13 yrs), Lower Broughton (40 yrs), I strongly believe that Broughton Ward should remain intact, serving both the communities of Higher and Lower Broughton. I like living in Broughton Ward. I feel it would be detrimental to Lower Broughton residents if it was placed in another Ward, e.g. Irwell Riverside because of new developments. Lower Broughton is best served within a combined Broughton Ward consisting of Higher and Lower Broughton. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13285 1/1 Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: As far as I am concerned Walkden and Worsley has and never will be part of Salford. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: None Comment text: Good Afternoon . Perhaps Irlam chould include all the properties in Barton and Winton on the west side of the M60 . Cadishead realistically could only in addition include Hollins Green and perhaps Glazebrook . However these are currently in Warrington and therefore Cheshire . Although we have close links with Hollins Green , they may not want to become part of Salford . Has anyone taken into account , the very large number of new homes that Peel are wanting to build in Irlam ? If they get their way , one development alone is for 1400 new houses and would increase the population by possibly 3,000 plus . We could end up with the largest land area wards in Irlam and Cadishead but not really increasing the size of the population . However also included is Port Salford , AJ Bell stadium and City Airport . Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Salford District Personal Details: Organisation Name: Comment text: Irlam and Cadishead wards already reflect communities defined by geographic and historical boundaries. There is also likely to be an increase in population over the next 10 - 20 years as new housing within the wards is developed. To extend further the boundaries of either ward eastwards would make no sense as there is a large industrial and open space at the eastern edge where there are very few residents who currently regard themselves as Peel Green rather than Irlam. As the wards are bounded on the southern side by the Manchester Ship Canal and to the west by the River Glaze/Warrington BC and to the north by the Moss and woodlands, the only way to increase the size of the wards would be to impose arbitrary changes eastwards - this makes no sense adminstratively. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Taylor, Laura From: Sent: 12 July 2018 13:29 To: reviews Subject: Boundary review for Salford City Cun cil: Irlam & Cadishead I would like to make a representation about this review. I have been reading some of the paperwork which I think is very complex but it would appear that you have missed a very important point. Irlam & Cadishead is a linear district separated from the rest of Salford by a mile of greenspace and has its own unique identity. Until 1974 it was an Urban District Council funded to a large extent by a vibrant steelworks. By starting from a point of view that there must be 60 Councillors and 20 wards, 3 per ward, fails to recognise the considerable reduction that has taken recently in the services over which Councillors have some control and the amount of money that the Council spends. Current plans, for Irlam ward, seem to show extending the boundary to the M60 motorway to the west which will bring in a sizeable group of people who have no connection to Irlam whatsoever and may be quite resistant to such a change. My suggestion would be to limit the number of Councillors for both Irlam & Cadishead to 2 per ward, keep the integrity of the district and allocate the other Councillors to other wards who possibly need more representatives. Further to the above I am not sure how aware local people are of these changes and therefore how many representations you may have received. I hope you will give my thoughts some consideration before making these changes which could lead to further erosion in the interest people take in local politic. 1 Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: Cadishead should only go from the the bridge over the River Glaze near Marge & Steel Roundabout to as far as Excalibur Way. Anything the far side of Irlam Railway line is Irlam. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: We have lived on the Crossfield Estate for fifty years and our children have gone to Irlam schools. We shop in Irlam, socialise in Irlam, go to church in Irlam and we have both worked in Irlam and the boundary is within Irlam but we have not got an Irlam post code. I believe that the newly built garage across from the estate has an Irlam postcode.We consider ourselves as living in Irlam as we are nearer here than Eccles but it can be confusing when trying to explain that our postal address is Eccles even though that is not where we live. If we order shopping on line from Tesco it is delivered from Walkden even though we shop at Irlam Tesco which is just up the road from our house! Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: I am very pleased with there boundaries that we have now. I live in Irlam and it feels a little bit unfair that my area is put together with Cadishead with wich the people from Irlam have nothing to do with. In old times most of the workplaces were there and the inhabitants of Irlam used to go there daily but not anymore for some tens of years. But this is still much better for people from Salford than what the conservatives have assumed we should have. Manchester city centre has nothing to do with Salford. Salford is a very, very old city and it is not at all good idea to be put together with Manchester and its problems. We have started really to thrive and we truly do not need their ideas of taking everything away from us, like our Media City. It is in Salford as is the Salford Quays where I used to live previously. Salford is its own well doing city and does not need any dividing by the conservatives to get them more voters. Bad, bad idea. We will keep all as it is. When the areas are this size our MPs have better opportunities to sort everything out in this end also and not only in the Parlament. Keep the borders as they are. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: Reduce or increase the ward councillors as appropriate. There is no need for 3 councillors in a safe such as mine with only 9000 residents. If you make boundary changes the areas will loose their identities. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: suggest that the irlam ward start from the railway bridge to give back most of the voters who used to be in it but were moved to cadishead.This is really the natural barrier between irlam and cadishead Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: Change nothing. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded 8/20/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: Irlam area I cannot understand your forecast is only plus 441 when you have a planning application for up to 1500 Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/14192 1/1 8/20/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: The A57 road runs through Eccles Town Centre. One side of this road is in Barton Ward, one side in Eccles Ward. This is confusing for everyone. I think both sides should be in Eccles Ward. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/14270 1/1 8/20/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Salford District Personal Details: Name: Organisation Name: Comment text: I wonder if there is any merit in dividing Ordsall and having a separate ward called Salford Quays in view of the amount of residential development that is taking place in this area? The line of the A5063 might be an appropriate boundary.