DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Vegetation Survey Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Vegetation Survey Report 2019 USFS REGION 6 RESTORATION SERVICES TEAM Vegetation and Fungi Survey Report Marys Peak Bonneville Power Administration Communications Site Project: West Point Spur Component April 11, 2019 Prepared by: United State Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Region 6 Restoration Services Team Prepared for: Bonneville Power Administration CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Project Location ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Description of Alternatives that Include West Point Spur ............................................................................. 7 West Point Spur Site Climate, Soils, and Vegetation ................................................................................ 7 Vegetation Survey Area ............................................................................................................................ 8 Background Research .................................................................................................................................. 10 Special-status Vascular Plant Species ..................................................................................................... 10 Special Status Non-Vascular Plant and Fungal Species ........................................................................... 11 Noxious Weeds ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Plant communities .................................................................................................................................. 13 Field Survey Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 13 Vascular Plant Survey Methodology ....................................................................................................... 13 Non-Vascular Vegetation Survey Methodology...................................................................................... 14 Field Documentation............................................................................................................................... 15 Special-status Plant Species .................................................................................................................... 16 Noxious Weeds ....................................................................................................................................... 16 Plant Communities .................................................................................................................................. 16 Botanists Resumes .................................................................................................................................. 17 Field Survey Results ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Plant Species Observed ........................................................................................................................... 18 Target Special-status Species Present..................................................................................................... 18 Vascular Plants .................................................................................................................................... 18 Non-vascular Plants and Fungi ............................................................................................................ 18 Target Noxious Weed Species Present ................................................................................................... 21 Description of Habitat Types/Plant Communities .................................................................................. 23 Forest .................................................................................................................................................. 24 Meadow .............................................................................................................................................. 26 Project Land Uses ................................................................................................................................ 28 Potential Impacts from Project Implementation ......................................................................................... 28 Removal of Native Vegetation and Seedbank, Soil compaction/Topsoil Removal, Erosion ................... 29 Introduction or Spread of non-native and noxious weeds ..................................................................... 29 Effects of Increased trampling of Plants and Effects of Disturbance on Meadow Habitat .................... 30 2 Marys Peak Bonneville Power Administration Communications Site Project: West Point Spur Component Vegetation Report Tree Removal .......................................................................................................................................... 30 Impacts Specific to Non-vascular Species ............................................................................................... 31 Best Management Practices ........................................................................................................................ 35 Construction-related BMPs: .................................................................................................................... 35 Revegetation-related BMPs: ................................................................................................................... 36 Weed-related BMPs: ............................................................................................................................... 36 Non-vascular Plant and Fungi Related BMP’s: ........................................................................................ 37 Additional BMPs Recommended by RST:................................................................................................ 37 Construction-related BMPs: ................................................................................................................ 37 Revegetation-related BMPs: ................................................................................................................ 38 Weed-related BMPs: ........................................................................................................................... 38 Control of Noxious Weeds ........................................................................................................................... 38 References ................................................................................................................................................... 40 Attachment 1 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service List ....................................................................................... 44 Attachment 2 - Known and Suspected Occurrences of Special-Status Vascular and Non-vascular Plant Species and Fungi ....................................................................................................................................... 52 Attachment 3 - ORBIC List of Vascular and Non-Vascular Plant Species and Fungi that Occur in Benton County, Oregon ........................................................................................................................................... 56 Attachment 4 - Vascular and Non-vascular Plant Species and Fungi on the SNF and Salem District BLM Sensitive Plant Lists ..................................................................................................................................... 68 Attachment 5 - Target Survey Special-Status Species List ........................................................................... 80 Attachment 6 - Target Noxious Weed Species ............................................................................................ 83 Attachment 7 - 2018 Vascular Plants Observed ......................................................................................... 85 Attachment 8 - Field Data Forms ................................................................................................................. 89 Attachment 9 Resumes .............................................................................................................................. 97 Attachment 10 - 2018 Non-vascular Plants and Fungi Observed .............................................................. 103 3 Marys Peak Bonneville Power Administration Communications Site Project: West Point Spur Component Vegetation Report INTRODUCTION The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) needs to maintain and upgrade the existing BPA communications site located at Marys Peak, approximately 15 miles southwest of Corvallis, in Benton County, Oregon. Some communications equipment at the site is outdated and unstable and needs to be replaced. The site needs a more reliable back-up power source due to potential power outages. These proposed actions are part of the Marys Peak BPA Communications Site Project (Project). The Project has four action Alternatives in addition to the No Action Alternative. Each Alternative has two geographic components. An unobstructed microwave beam path is needed between two communications sites in two different locations in order for voice
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Plant Press
    Special Symposium Issue continues on page 14 Department of Botany & the U.S. National Herbarium The Plant Press New Series - Vol. 20 - No. 3 July-September 2017 Botany Profile Plant Expeditions: History Has Its Eyes On You By Gary A. Krupnick he 15th Smithsonian Botani- as specimens (living or dried) in centuries field explorers to continue what they are cal Symposium was held at the past. doing. National Museum of Natural The symposium began with Laurence T he morning session began with a History (NMNH) and the U.S. Botanic Dorr (Chair of Botany, NMNH) giv- th Garden (USBG) on May 19, 2017. The ing opening remarks. Since the lectures series of talks focusing on the 18 symposium, titled “Exploring the Natural were taking place in Baird Auditorium, Tcentury explorations of Canada World: Plants, People and Places,” Dorr took the opportunity to talk about and the United States. Jacques Cayouette focused on the history of plant expedi- the theater’s namesake, Spencer Baird. A (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) tions. Over 200 participants gathered to naturalist, ornithologist, ichthyologist, and presented the first talk, “Moravian Mis- hear stories dedicated col- sionaries as Pioneers of Botanical Explo- and learn about lector, Baird was ration in Labrador (1765-1954).” He what moti- the first curator explained that missionaries of the Mora- vated botanical to be named vian Church, one of the oldest Protestant explorers of at the Smith- denominations, established missions the Western sonian Institu- along coastal Labrador in Canada in the Hemisphere in the 18th, 19th, and 20th tion and eventually served as Secretary late 1700s.
    [Show full text]
  • Calochortus Flexuosus S. Watson (Winding Mariposa Lily): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Calochortus flexuosus S. Watson (winding mariposa lily): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project July 24, 2006 Susan Spackman Panjabi and David G. Anderson Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Panjabi, S.S. and D.G. Anderson. (2006, July 24). Calochortus flexuosus S. Watson (winding mariposa lily): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/calochortusflexuosus.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was facilitated by the helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Leslie Stewart, Peggy Fiedler, Marilyn Colyer, Peggy Lyon, Lynn Moore, and William Jennings. Their interest in the project and time spent answering questions were extremely valuable, and their insights into the distribution, habitat, and ecology of Calochortus flexuosus were crucial to this project. Thanks also to Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Jim Maxwell, Andy Kratz, and Joy Bartlett for assisting with questions and project management. Thanks to Kimberly Nguyen for her work on the layout and for bringing this assessment to Web publication. Jane Nusbaum and Barbara Brayfield provided crucial financial oversight. Peggy Lyon and Marilyn Colyer provided valuable insights based on their experiences with C. flexuosus. Leslie Stewart provided information specific to the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management, including the Canyons of the Ancients National Monument. Annette Miller provided information on C. flexuosusseed storage status. Drs. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson provided access to specimens of C.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • View Plant List Here
    11th annual Theodore Payne Native Plant Garden Tour planT list garden 2 in mid-city provided by homeowner Botanical Name Common Name Acalypha californica California Copperleaf Achillea millefolium Yarrow Achillea millefolium var rosea ‘Island Pink’ Island Pink Yarrow Adiantum jordanii California Maidenhair Fern Agave deserti Desert Agave Allium crispum Wild Onion Allium falcifolium Scythe Leaf Onion Allium haematochiton Red Skinned Onion Allium howellii var. clokeyi Mt. Pinos Onion Allium unifolium Single Leaf Onion Anemopsis californica Yerba Mansa Aquilegia formosa Western Columbine Arabis blepharophylla ‘Spring Charm’ Spring Charm Coast Rock Cress Arbutus menziesii Madrone Arctostaphylos ‘Baby Bear’ Baby Bear Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Emerald Carpet’ Emerald Carpet Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Howard McMinn’ Howard McMinn Manzanita Arctostaphylos bakeri ‘Louis Edmunds’ Louis Edmunds Manzanita Arctostaphylos densiflora ‘Sentinel’ Sentinel Manzanita Arctostaphylos glauca Big Berry Manzanita Arctostaphylos hookeri ‘Monterey Carpet’ Monterey Carpet Manzanita Arctostaphylos hookeri ‘Wayside’ Wayside Manzanita Arctostaphylos manzanita ‘Byrd Hill’ Byrd Hill Manzanita Arctostaphylos manzanita ‘Dr. Hurd’ Dr. Hurd Manzanita Arctostaphylos viscida Whiteleaf Manzanita Aristida purpurea Purple Three Awn Armeria maritima ‘Rubrifolia’ Rubrifolia Sea Thrift Artemisia californica California Sagebrush Artemisia californica ‘Canyon Grey’ Canyon Grey California Sagebrush Artemisia ludoviciana Silver Wormwood Artemisia pycnocephala ‘David’s Choice’ David’s
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation
    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Spore Prints
    SPORE PRINTS BULLETIN OF THE PUGET SOUND MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY Number 473 June 2011 OLDEST, ODDEST FUNGI FINALLY “The big message here is that most fungi and most fungal diversity PHOTOGRAPHED Susan Milius reside in fungi that have neither been collected nor cultivated,” Science News, May 12, 2011 says John W. Taylor of the University of California, Berkeley. Exeter team member Meredith Jones spotted the hard-to-detect organisms by marking them with fluorescent tags. The trick re- vealed fungal cells attached to algal cells as if parasitizing them. M. Jones One of the big questions about early fungi is whether they might have arisen from “some kind of parasitic ancestor like Rozella,” says Rytas Vilgalys of Duke University. Interesting, yes. But loosening the definition of fungi to include organisms without chitin walls could wreak havoc in the concept of that group, objects Robert Lücking of the Field Museum in Chicago. “I would actually conclude, based on the evidence, that these are not fungi,” he says. Instead, they might be near rela- tives—an almost-fungus. Two fungal cells, possibly from an ancient lineage, each show a curvy, taillike flagellum (red) during a mobile stage in their life cycle. IS MUTATED FUNGUS KILLING AMERICAN BATS? Andy Coghlan Images of little dots, some wriggling a skinny tail, give scientists New Scientist, May 24, 2011 a first glimpse of a vast swath of the oldest, and perhaps oddest, fungal group alive today. A fungus blamed for killing more than a mil- The first views suggest that, unlike any other fungi known, these lion bats in the US since 2006 has been found might live as essentially naked cells without the rigid cell wall to differ only slightly from an apparently that supposedly defines a fungus, says Tom Richards of the Natu- harmless European version.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Asteraceae Copy.Indd
    Family Asteraceae Family: Asteraceae Spotted Knapweed Centaurea biebersteinii DC. Synonyms Acosta maculosa auct. non Holub, Centaurea maculosa auct. non Lam. Related Species Russian Knapweed Acroptilon repens (L.) DC. Description Spotted knapweed is a biennial to short-lived perennial plant. Seedling cotyledons are ovate, with the first leaves lance-shaped, undivided, and hairless. (Young seedlings can appear grass-like.) Stems grow 1 to 4 feet tall, and are many-branched, with a single flower at the end of each branch. Rosette leaves are indented or divided Old XID Services photo by Richard about half-way to the midrib. Stem leaves are alternate, pinnately divided, Spotted knapweed flower. and get increasingly smaller toward the tip of each branch. Flower heads are urn-shaped, up to 1 inch wide, and composed of pink, purple, or sometimes white disk flowers. A key characteristic of spotted knap- weed is the dark comb-like fringe on the tips of the bracts, found just below the flower petals. These dark-tipped bracts give this plant its “spotted” appearance. Russian knapweed is a creeping perennial plant that is extensively branched, with solitary urn-shaped pink or purple flower heads at the end of each branch. Similar in appearance to spotted knapweed, Russian knapweed can be distinguished by its slightly smaller flower heads, flower head bracts covered in light hairs, with papery tips, and scaly dark brown or black rhizomes, which have a burnt appearance. Family: Asteraceae Spotted Knapweed Leaves and stems of both spotted and Russian knapweeds are covered in fine hairs, giving the plants a grayish cast.
    [Show full text]
  • West-Side Prairies & Woodlands
    Washington State Natural Regions Beyond the Treeline: Beyond the Forested Ecosystems: Prairies, Alpine & Drylands WA Dept. of Natural Resources 1998 West-side Prairies & Woodlands Oak Woodland & Prairie Ecosystems West-side Oak Woodland & Prairie Ecosystems in Grey San Juan Island Prairies 1. South Puget Sound prairies & oak woodlands 2. Island / Peninsula coastal prairies & woodlands Olympic Peninsula 3. Rocky balds Prairies South Puget Prairies WA GAP Analysis project 1996 Oak Woodland & Prairie Ecosystems San Juan West-side Island South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems Oak Woodland & Prairie Prairies Ecosystems in Grey Grasslands dominated by Olympic • Grasses Peninsula Herbs Prairies • • Bracken fern South • Mosses & lichens Puget Prairies With scattered shrubs Camas (Camassia quamash) WA GAP Analysis project 1996 •1 South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems Mounded prairie Some of these are “mounded” prairies Mima Mounds Research Natural Area South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems Scattered shrubs Lichen mats in the prairie Serviceberry Cascara South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems As unique ecosystems they provide habitat for unique plants As unique ecosystems they provide habitat for unique critters Camas (Camassia quamash) Mazama Pocket Gopher Golden paintbrush Many unique species of butterflies (Castilleja levisecta) (this is an Anise Swallowtail) Photos from Dunn & Ewing (1997) •2 South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems Fire is
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Classification of Trametes
    TAXON 60 (6) • December 2011: 1567–1583 Justo & Hibbett • Phylogenetic classification of Trametes SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY Phylogenetic classification of Trametes (Basidiomycota, Polyporales) based on a five-marker dataset Alfredo Justo & David S. Hibbett Clark University, Biology Department, 950 Main St., Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Alfredo Justo, [email protected] Abstract: The phylogeny of Trametes and related genera was studied using molecular data from ribosomal markers (nLSU, ITS) and protein-coding genes (RPB1, RPB2, TEF1-alpha) and consequences for the taxonomy and nomenclature of this group were considered. Separate datasets with rDNA data only, single datasets for each of the protein-coding genes, and a combined five-marker dataset were analyzed. Molecular analyses recover a strongly supported trametoid clade that includes most of Trametes species (including the type T. suaveolens, the T. versicolor group, and mainly tropical species such as T. maxima and T. cubensis) together with species of Lenzites and Pycnoporus and Coriolopsis polyzona. Our data confirm the positions of Trametes cervina (= Trametopsis cervina) in the phlebioid clade and of Trametes trogii (= Coriolopsis trogii) outside the trametoid clade, closely related to Coriolopsis gallica. The genus Coriolopsis, as currently defined, is polyphyletic, with the type species as part of the trametoid clade and at least two additional lineages occurring in the core polyporoid clade. In view of these results the use of a single generic name (Trametes) for the trametoid clade is considered to be the best taxonomic and nomenclatural option as the morphological concept of Trametes would remain almost unchanged, few new nomenclatural combinations would be necessary, and the classification of additional species (i.e., not yet described and/or sampled for mo- lecular data) in Trametes based on morphological characters alone will still be possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytisus Striatus (Fabaceae), Nueva “Retama” Adventicia En Argentina
    DARWINIANA, nueva serie 7(2): 335-341. 2019 Versión de registro, efectivamente publicada el 27 de diciembre de 2019 DOI: 10.14522/darwiniana.2019.72.837 ISSN 0011-6793 impresa - ISSN 1850-1699 en línea CYTISUS STRIATUS (FABACEAE), NUEVA “RETAMA” ADVENTICIA EN ARGENTINA Javier G. Puntieri1 & Jorge O. Chiapella2 1 Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Sede Andina, Güemes 383, El Bolsón, CP 8300, Río Negro, Argentina; [email protected] (autor corresponsal). 2 Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, POBox 495, CP 5000, Córdoba, Argentina. Abstract. Puntieri, J. G. & J. O. Chiapella. 2019. Cytisus striatus (Fabaceae), a new adventitious “broom” in Argentina. Darwiniana, nueva serie 7(2): 335-341. The “broom” Cytisus striatus is cited for the first time for Argentina. This species coexists with the similar but more widespread “scotch broom”, C. scoparius, frequent in disturbed habitats of Patagonia and temperate regions worldwide. So far, eight ruderal seed-producing individuals of C. striatus have been spotted in Patagonia. The morphological resemblance between C. striatus and C. scoparius, and the distance between both populations of C. striatus found in Argentina up to now (31 km) suggest that this species could be abundant in Andean regions of Patagonia. This paper provides a key for the identification of the brooms of Tribe Cytiseae present in Argentina. Keywords. Broom; exotic shrubs; Fabaceae; Patagonia. Resumen. Puntieri, J. G. & J. O. Chiapella. 2019. Cytisus striatus (Fabaceae), nueva “retama” adventicia en Argentina. Darwiniana, nueva serie 7(2): 335-341.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Phylogeography of Rhizobial Symbionts Nodulating Legumes of the Tribe Genisteae
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lincoln University Research Archive G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Phylogeny and Phylogeography of Rhizobial Symbionts Nodulating Legumes of the Tribe Genisteae Tomasz St˛epkowski 1,*, Joanna Banasiewicz 1, Camille E. Granada 2, Mitchell Andrews 3 and Luciane M. P. Passaglia 4 1 Autonomous Department of Microbial Biology, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 2 Universidade do Vale do Taquari—UNIVATES, Rua Avelino Tallini, 171, 95900-000 Lajeado, RS, Brazil; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand; [email protected] 4 Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Caixa Postal 15.053, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-509-453-708 Received: 31 January 2018; Accepted: 5 March 2018; Published: 14 March 2018 Abstract: The legume tribe Genisteae comprises 618, predominantly temperate species, showing an amphi-Atlantic distribution that was caused by several long-distance dispersal events. Seven out of the 16 authenticated rhizobial genera can nodulate particular Genisteae species. Bradyrhizobium predominates among rhizobia nodulating Genisteae legumes. Bradyrhizobium strains that infect Genisteae species belong to both the Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bradyrhizobium elkanii superclades. In symbiotic gene phylogenies, Genisteae bradyrhizobia are scattered among several distinct clades, comprising strains that originate from phylogenetically distant legumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridgeoporus Nobilissimus Is Much More Abundant Than Indicated by the Presence of Basidiocarps in Forest Stands
    North American Fungi Volume 10, Number 3, Pages 1-28 Published May 29, 2015 Bridgeoporus nobilissimus is much more abundant than indicated by the presence of basidiocarps in forest stands Matthew Gordon1 and Kelli Van Norman2 1Molecular Solutions LLC, 715 NW Hoyt St., #2546, Portland, OR 97208, USA 2Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program, USDI Bureau of Land Management Oregon State Office & USDA Forest Service Region 6, 1220 SW 3rd Ave., Portland, OR 97204, USA Gordon, M., and K. Van Norman. 2015. Bridgeoporus nobilissimus is much more abundant than indicated by the presence of basidiocarps in forest stands. North American Fungi 10(3): 1-28. http://dx.doi:10.2509/naf2015.010.003 Corresponding author: Matt Gordon [email protected]. Accepted for publication May 4, 2015. http://pnwfungi.org Copyright © 2015 Pacific Northwest Fungi Project. All rights reserved. Abstract: The polypore Bridgeoporus nobilissimus produces large perennial basidiocarps on large diameter Abies stumps, snags and trees in coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. Despite the size and persistence of the basidiocarps, they are rarely observed, making the conservation of this species a concern. We determined that a genetic marker for this fungus could be detected in DNA extracted from wood cores taken from trees hosting basidiocarps. We then tested 105 trees and stumps that did not host B. nobilissimus basidiocarps in plots surrounding B. nobilissimus conks, and 291 trees and stumps in randomly located plots in four stands that contained at least one B. nobilissimus basidiocarp. We found that trees of all sizes throughout all of the stands hosted B.
    [Show full text]