DOCSLIB.ORG

Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Innovation U 2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Louis G. Tornatzky, PhD Elaine C. Rideout, PhD Innovation U 2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Louis G. Tornatzky, PhD Elaine C. Rideout, PhD Copyright 2014 Louis G. Tornatzky. All rights reserved. This work was created for the purposes of advancing public and private discussion related to university innovation, and to advance education and understanding in that field. Any person or organization who acquires a paper or electronic version of this work, and who will use it for those purposes, is permitted to freely copy and disseminate the entire volume or chapters thereof. A pdf version is available at: www.Innovation-U.com Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................................................vii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................................ix Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................1 Cases Arizona State University....................................................................................................................................................19 Brigham Young University ..............................................................................................................................................39 California Institute of Technology ........................................................................................................................51 Carnegie Mellon University ..........................................................................................................................................69 Clemson University ................................................................................................................................................................91 University of Florida ..............................................................................................................................................................109 Georgia Institute of Technology...............................................................................................................................127 Massachusetts Institute of Technology..............................................................................................................145 North Carolina State University ..............................................................................................................................171 Purdue University .....................................................................................................................................................................189 Stanford University .................................................................................................................................................................205 University of Utah ....................................................................................................................................................................225 Summary and Recommendations .......................................................................................................................245 About the Authors and Contributors ............................................................................................257 v vi Foreword No one realized ten years ago how prescient Innovation U would be. Back then, the words economic development and universities rarely appeared together. Now, many economic developers include universities in their asset portfolios, and a large number of university officials purposefully interact with their local economies.Innovation U should not claim sole credit for this shift; it can, however, claim to have raised awareness in a few critical groups and helped build momentum for critical policies. Innovation U 2.0: Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy enters a very different world than its predecessor. Government officials are questioning the role of universities in society. The economic underpinnings of higher education, for universities and stu- dents, are stressed. Federal support for research is uncertain. Never have so many raised so many questions about the value, purpose, and impacts of higher education, at least in contemporary times. Amid all these questions, the strategies and practices encapsulated in this book present some answers. Innovation U institutions dramatically depict universities as creators of intellectual capital and economic growth. They show paths for universities to follow for larger impacts on their region. The cases are not exhaustive, and certainly there are omissions. Volumes could be written about each university, and many others are accom- plishing remarkable feats. Dr. Lou Tornatzky and his colleagues—fueled not by remuneration, but by an intense belief in the economic power of universities—should be commended for their dedica- tion and quality product. Dr. Tornatzky recently retired from Cal Poly, and this project caps an illustrious career as a teacher, manager, and researcher in all things in technology and policy. Scott Doron Director Southern Technology Council Research Triangle Park North Carolina vii viii Acknowledgements Financial and in-kind support from the following organizations were instrumental in enabling the execution of this project and the early dissemination of the final report: The National Science Foundation, Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers Program (IIP-1140438) provided monetary support for the research team. The William R. Kenan Jr. Institute for Engineering, Technology & Science provided monetary support for project execution including dissemination of the final report. The Orfalea College of Business, California Polytechnic State University, supported Dr. Tornatzky’s sabbatical leave in Research Triangle Park, NC. The North Carolina Office of Science and Technology provided logistical and dissemination support. The State Science and Technology Institute featured a digital version of the report in its online newsletter, and sponsored a Webinair to present the project to its large constituency. The Information Technology Innovation Foundation served as a dissemination partner and featured a digital version of the report in its online newsletter. North Carolina State University made office space and support services available for Dr. Tornatzky during his sabbatical leave in Research Triangle Park. A number of individuals made in-kind contributions: Susan Opava, Paul Waugaman and Trent Williams were outstanding in their roles as “critical readers” of draft chapters, and suggesting corrections in grammar, style, and substance. Scott Doron, former Director of Southern Technology Council and a long-time collaborator, was a rock of intellectual and organizational contributions of inestimable value to the execution of this project. His faith in what we wanted to do, with no money to start with, kept us going. Denis Gray was one of the authors on the 2002 Innovation U book, but regrettably took a pass on being a co-author on this project. Nonetheless, over the past 18 months he has provided logistical, intellectual, and political assistance that has gone beyond the call of duty and expectations of friendship. He also was a significant ix contributor in the key Introduction and Summary chapters, and co-designed and participated in the Case Selection process. Lynette Tornatzky put up with the senior author’s peaks of creative bliss and anguish, and contributed her graphic design skills to the format of the report. During the case selection process, eight very knowledgeable individuals provided valuable substantive input and contributions of their time as a Project Advisory Committee member: John W. Ahlen, President (retired), Arkansas Science and Technology Authority; Robert D. Atkinson, President, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation; Elizabeth Popp Berman, Associate Professor, University of Albany, SUNY; Barry Bozeman, Arizona Centennial Professor of Public Management and Technology Policy, Arizona State University; Dan Berglund, President & CEO, State Science & Technology Institute; Jacques Koppel, Principal, Koppel Group; Elliott Kulakowski, CEO, Society of Research Administrators International; and James J. Zuiches, Vice Chancellor (retired), North Carolina State University. x Introduction* The suggestion that US universities do in each university case study; and (5) to describe more to pursue and optimize the potential case selection and analysis methodologies that were usefulness of the results of taxpayer-funded used, as well as ones that were avoided, and why. research is not an acclamation that US universities have failed. Instead, it is a Innovation U - 2002 suggestion that they can improve and, in Twelve years ago a slim paperback volume was doing so, better advance economic growth completed and widely distributed by the Southern and human welfare. Paraphrasing from Growth Policies Board (SGPB),1 located in elsewhere in this article, better than it Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. It was was is no excuse for failing to pursue or entitled Innovation U. New University Roles in a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Factbook Section Dividers Font Size 38 and 35 2008 09.Indd
    History, Mission, and Organization Table of Contents History, Mission, and Organization About Carnegie Mellon University 1.1 University Vision, Mission, and Values 1.2 Carnegie Mellon University History 1.3 Seven Colleges 1.6 Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar 1.7 Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley 1.7 Federally Funded Research and Development Center 1.7 Research Centers and Institutes 1.8 Accreditations by College and Department 1.10 University Organizational Chart 1.11 University Administration 1.16 Board of Trustees 1.16 About Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon has rapidly evolved into an internationally recognized institution with a distinctive mix of world-class educational and research programs in computer science, robotics, engineering, the sciences, business, public policy, fine arts, and the humanities. More than 11,000 undergraduate and graduate students at Carnegie Mellon receive an education characterized by its focus on creating and implementing solutions for real problems, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovation. A small student-to-faculty ratio provides an opportunity for close interaction between students and professors. Jared L. Cohon became Carnegie Mellon’s eighth president in July 1997 and has led the university along a trajectory of innovation and growth. In October 2008, he announced the public phase of “Inspire Innovation: The Campaign for Carnegie Mellon University,” a comprehensive campaign that is focused on building the university’s endowment; supporting faculty, students, and innovative research; and enhancing the physical campus with equipment and facility improvements. Carnegie Mellon’s strategic plan, developed in 2008, aims to guide the university in several core areas including education and student life, research and artistic creation, regional impact, and international initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Organization Table of Contents
    History and Organization Table of Contents History and Organization Carnegie Mellon University History Carnegie Mellon Colleges, Branch Campuses, and Institute Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley Software Engineering Institute Research Centers and Institutes Accreditations by College and Department Carnegie Mellon University History Introduction The story of Carnegie Mellon University is unique and remarkable. After its founding in 1900 as the Carnegie Technical Schools, serving workers and young men and women of the Pittsburgh area, it became the degree-granting Carnegie Institute of Technology in 1912. “Carnegie Tech,” as it was known, merged with the Mellon Institute to become Carnegie Mellon University in 1967. Carnegie Mellon has since soared to national and international leadership in higher education—and it continues to be known for solving real-world problems, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovation. The story of the university’s famous founder—Andrew Carnegie—is also remarkable. A self-described “working-boy” with an “intense longing” for books, Andrew Carnegie emigrated from Scotland with his family in 1848 and settled in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He became a self-educated entrepreneur, whose Carnegie Steel Company grew to be the world’s largest producer of steel by the end of the nineteenth century. On November 15, 1900, Andrew Carnegie formally announced: “For many years I have nursed the pleasing thought that I might be the fortunate giver of a Technical Institute to our City, fashioned upon the best models, for I know of no institution which Pittsburgh, as an industrial centre, so much needs.” He concluded with the words “My heart is in the work,” which would become the university’s official motto.
    [Show full text]
  • THE INAUGURATION of FARNAM JAHANIAN
    THE INAUGURATION of FARNAM JAHANIAN AS THE 10TH PRESIDENT OF CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 26, 2018 2 #CMUFARNAM TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 About Farnam Jahanian 4 Investiture Ceremony Program 6 Keynote Speakers 8 Performers 10 Ceremonial Traditions 12 Board of Trustees 14 University Leadership 15 Past Presidents 16 Inauguration Performers 18 University Delegates 19 Alma Mater INVESTITURE CEREMONY 1 FARNAM JAHANIAN President, Henry L. Hillman President’s Chair Farnam Jahanian was appointed the 10th president of Carnegie Mellon University by its Board of Trustees in March 2018. He was previously the university’s provost and later served as interim president from July 2017 to February 2018. A nationally recognized computer scientist, entrepreneur, public servant and higher education leader, Jahanian brings to CMU extensive leadership and administrative expertise, not only in advancing research and education within and across disciplines, but also in translating research into technologies and practices that benefit society. He first joined CMU as vice president for research in 2014, where he was responsible for nurturing excellence in research, scholarship and creative activities. In his role as 2 #CMUFARNAM provost and chief academic officer from May 2015 to June 2017, Jahanian had broad responsibility for leading CMU’s schools, colleges, institutes and campuses and was instrumental in long-range institutional and academic planning and implementation. Prior to coming to CMU, Jahanian led the National Science Foundation Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE) from 2011 to 2014. He guided CISE, with a budget of almost $900 million, in its mission to advance scientific discovery and engineering innovation through its support of fundamental research.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 4 H M V
    HISTORY, MISSION, ORGANIZATION Table of Contents History, Mission, Organization About Carnegie Mellon University 1.1 University Vision, Mission & Goals 1.2 Carnegie Mellon University History 1.3 The Colleges 1.6 Software Engineering Institute 1.7 Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar 1.7 Carnegie Mellon West 1.7 Research Centers, Fall Semester 2006 1.8 Accreditations by College & Department, Fall Semester 2006 1.11 University Organizational Chart 1.12 Administration, Academic Year 2006 - 2007, as of Fall 2006 1.16 ABOUT CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY Carnegie Mellon has rapidly evolved into an internationally recognized institution with a distinctive mix of world-class educational and research programs in computer science, robotics, engineering, the sciences, business, public policy, fine arts and the humanities. More than 10,000 undergraduate and graduate students at Carnegie Mellon receive an education characterized by its focus on creating and implementing solutions to solve real problems, interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation. A small student-to-faculty ratio provides an opportunity for close interaction between students and professors. Carnegie Mellon's eighth president, Jared L. Cohon, is leading a campus-wide effort that aims to leverage Carnegie Mellon's strengths to impact the world in the fields of biotechnology, information and security technology, environmental science, the fine arts and humanities. The university also is committed to broadening and enhancing undergraduate education to allow students to explore various disciplines while maintaining a core focus in their primary area of study. Realizing that today’s graduates must understand international issues, Carnegie Mellon is committed to providing a global education for its students and is striving to expand its international offerings to increase its presence on a global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • History, Mission, and Organization Table of Contents
    History, Mission, and Organization Table of Contents History, Mission, and Organization University Vision, Mission, and Values Carnegie Mellon University History Carnegie Mellon Colleges, Branch Campuses, and Institute Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley Software Engineering Institute Research Centers and Institutes Accreditations by College and Department University Administration Board of Trustees University Vision, Mission, and Values Vision Carnegie Mellon will meet the changing needs of society by building on its traditions of innovation, problem solving, and interdisciplinarity. Mission To create and disseminate knowledge and art through research and creative inquiry, teaching, and learning, and to transfer our intellectual and artistic product to enhance society in meaningful and sustainable ways. To serve our students by teaching them problem solving, leadership and teamwork skills, and the value of a commitment to quality, ethical behavior, and respect for others. To achieve these ends by pursuing the advantages of a diverse and relatively small university community, open to the exchange of ideas, where discovery, creativity, and personal and professional development can flourish. Values Dedication, as exemplified by our commitment to the critical issues of society and our uncompromising work ethic. Collaboration, as exemplified by our interdisciplinarity, our external partnerships, and our capacity to create new fields of inquiry. Measuring excellence by impact, as exemplified by our focus on issues critical to regional development, national interest, and global welfare. Entrepreneurship, as exemplified by openness to new ideas, prudent use of resources, and readiness to act. Depth driving breadth, as exemplified by our issue-driven research, our context-based general education initiatives, and our focus on problem solving and creative production at all levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy
    I!!"#$%&"! U 2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Louis G. Tornatzky, PhD Elaine C. Rideout, PhD I!!"#$%&"! U 2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Louis G. Tornatzky, PhD Elaine C. Rideout, PhD Copyright 2014 Louis G. Tornatzky. All rights reserved. !is work was created for the purposes of advancing public and private discussion related to university innovation, and to advance education and understanding in that "eld. Any person or organization who acquires a paper or electronic version of this work, and who will use it for those purposes, is permitted to freely copy and disseminate the entire volume or chapters thereof. A pdf version is available at: www.Innovation-U.com C!"#$"#% F#$%&#$' ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ vii A()*#&+%',%-%*./ .................................................................................................................................................................... ix I*.$#'0(.1#* ............................................................................................................................................................................................1 C2/%/ Arizona State University....................................................................................................................................................19 Brigham Young University ..............................................................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Fact Book 2008 09 H M Org
    History, Mission, and Organization Table of Contents History, Mission, and Organization About Carnegie Mellon University 1.1 University Vision, Mission, and Values 1.2 Carnegie Mellon University History 1.3 Seven Distinguished Colleges 1.6 Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar 1.7 Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley 1.7 Federally Funded Research and Development Center 1.7 Research Centers and Institutes 1.8 Accreditations by College and Department 1.10 University Organizational Chart 1.11 University Administration 1.16 Board of Trustees 1.16 About Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon has rapidly evolved into an internationally recognized institution with a distinctive mix of world-class educational and research programs in computer science, robotics, engineering, the sciences, business, public policy, fine arts, and the humanities. More than 11,000 undergraduate and graduate students at Carnegie Mellon receive an education characterized by its focus on creating and implementing solutions to solve real problems, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovation. A small student-to-faculty ratio provides an opportunity for close interaction between students and professors. Jared L. Cohon became Carnegie Mellon’s eighth president in July 1997 and has led the university along a trajectory of innovation and growth. In October 2008, he announced the public phase of Inspire Innovation, a $1 billion comprehensive campaign to increase the power and reach of Carnegie Mellon. The campaign is focused on building the university’s endowment, supporting faculty, students and innovative research, and enhancing the physical campus with equipment and facility improvements. Carnegie Mellon’s strategic plan, developed in 2008, aims to guide the university in several core areas, including education and student life, research and artistic creation, regional impact and international initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • History, Mission, and Organization (.Pdf)
    History, Mission, and Organization Table of Contents History, Mission, and Organization About Carnegie Mellon University University Vision, Mission, and Values Carnegie Mellon University History Seven Colleges Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley Federally Funded Research and Development Center Research Centers and Institutes Accreditations by College and Department University Administration Board of Trustees About Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon has rapidly evolved into a global research university, renowned for its groundbreaking innovations, award-winning faculty, and distinctive mix of world-class programs in computer science, robotics, engineering, the sciences, business, public policy, the arts, and the humanities. More than 11,000 undergraduate and graduate students at Carnegie Mellon are immersed in an educational environment characterized by its small student-to-faculty ratio and award-winning faculty who collaborate with students to develop solutions for real-world problems. The result is a highly gifted student body that is sought after by employers around the world. Jared L. Cohon became Carnegie Mellon’s eighth president in July 1997 and has led the university along a trajectory of innovation and growth. In October 2008, he announced the public phase of “Inspire Innovation: The Campaign for Carnegie Mellon University,” a comprehensive campaign that is focused on building the university’s endowment; supporting faculty, students, and innovative research; and enhancing the physical campus with equipment and facility improvements. Carnegie Mellon’s strategic plan, developed in 2008, aims to guide the university in several core areas including education and student life, research and artistic creation, regional impact, and international initiatives. In education, the plan affirms the importance of student breadth, learning outside the classroom, and understanding global, environmental and ethical issues.
    [Show full text]
  • History, Mission, and Organization Table of Contents
    History, Mission, and Organization Table of Contents History, Mission, and Organization University Vision, Mission, and Values Carnegie Mellon University History Carnegie Mellon Colleges, Branch Campuses, and Institute Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley Software Engineering Institute Research Centers and Institutes Accreditations by College and Department University Administration Board of Trustees University Vision, Mission, and Values Vision Carnegie Mellon will meet the changing needs of society by building on its traditions of innovation, problem solving, and interdisciplinarity. Mission To create and disseminate knowledge and art through research and creative inquiry, teaching, and learning, and to transfer our intellectual and artistic product to enhance society in meaningful and sustainable ways. To serve our students by teaching them problem solving, leadership and teamwork skills, and the value of a commitment to quality, ethical behavior, and respect for others. To achieve these ends by pursuing the advantages of a diverse and relatively small university community, open to the exchange of ideas, where discovery, creativity, and personal and professional development can flourish. Values Dedication, as exemplified by our commitment to the critical issues of society and our uncompromising work ethic. Collaboration, as exemplified by our interdisciplinarity, our external partnerships, and our capacity to create new fields of inquiry. Measuring excellence by impact, as exemplified by our focus on issues critical to regional development, national interest, and global welfare. Entrepreneurship, as exemplified by openness to new ideas, prudent use of resources, and readiness to act. Depth driving breadth, as exemplified by our issue-driven research, our context-based general education initiatives, and our focus on problem solving and creative production at all levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Espinel Speaks About Intellectual Property Concerns Influx
    Spring Carnival 2013 Preview: ‘Fractured Fairytales’ Reunions Issue • Section B Midway Map • C8 Carnival Calendar • C15 thetartan.org @thetartan April 15, 2013 Volume 107, Issue 24 Carnegie Mellon’s student newspaper since 1906 ‘Thrive at CMU’ to JFC proposes important bylaw changes improve wellness ALVIN MATHEW University Education Council Staffwriter to seek out course instruc- tors. Months after Carnegie “In my personal opinion,” Mellon’s stress culture Town Chaurasia said, “if you went Hall in January, the univer- to the wellness forum about sity and its students are look- the issues CMU students had, ing for ways to address stress the number of students who management and wellness on came showed something had campus. Neha Chaurasia, a to be done.” senior biological sciences ma- The reasons for the at- jor, is designing a new StuCo tendees’ diminishing well- class on wellness for incom- ness were numerous, she ing first-years. pointed out, “and many were The course is currently ti- trying to push it under the tled “Thrive at CMU” and has received approval from the See WELLNESS, A4 Kate Groschner/Photo Editor Student Senate voted on the revisions to the allocation of the student activities fee as part of an effort to clarify the current fiscal process. LAUREN WILLIAMS The changes clarify many align with what was written in As SBVPF, Mark examined Staffwriter fiscal processes and are meant the bylaws. the issues and proposed revi- to increase the transparency Jon Mark, current SBVPF sions. Important changes to the of the JFC, which is the stu- and senior lighting design ma- Senior computer science Student Body Constitution, dent-run organization respon- jor, said, “We’re going to do major and executive cabinet Student Government Fiscal sible for allocating student ac- what we’re supposed to do [at constitutional adviser Ste- Policy, and Joint Funding tivities fee money to Carnegie fiscal close], but you’d rather it phen Tjader then formally Committee (JFC) bylaws were Mellon student organizations.
    [Show full text]