Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy I!!"#$%&"! U 2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Louis G. Tornatzky, PhD Elaine C. Rideout, PhD I!!"#$%&"! U 2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy Louis G. Tornatzky, PhD Elaine C. Rideout, PhD Copyright 2014 Louis G. Tornatzky. All rights reserved. !is work was created for the purposes of advancing public and private discussion related to university innovation, and to advance education and understanding in that "eld. Any person or organization who acquires a paper or electronic version of this work, and who will use it for those purposes, is permitted to freely copy and disseminate the entire volume or chapters thereof. A pdf version is available at: www.Innovation-U.com C!"#$"#% F#$%&#$' ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ vii A()*#&+%',%-%*./ .................................................................................................................................................................... ix I*.$#'0(.1#* ............................................................................................................................................................................................1 C2/%/ Arizona State University....................................................................................................................................................19 Brigham Young University ..............................................................................................................................................39 California Institute of Technology ........................................................................................................................51 Carnegie Mellon University ..........................................................................................................................................69 Clemson University ................................................................................................................................................................91 University of Florida ..............................................................................................................................................................109 Georgia Institute of Technology...............................................................................................................................127 Massachusetts Institute of Technology..............................................................................................................145 North Carolina State University ..............................................................................................................................171 Purdue University .....................................................................................................................................................................191 Stanford University .................................................................................................................................................................205 University of Utah ....................................................................................................................................................................225 S0--2$3 2*' R%(#--%*'2.1#*/ .......................................................................................................................245 A4#0. .5% A0.5#$/ 2*' C#*.$140.#$/ ............................................................................................257 v vi F!&$'!&( No one realized ten years ago how prescient Innovation U would be. Back then, the words economic development and universities rarely appeared together. Now, many economic developers include universities in their asset portfolios, and a large number of university o6cials purposefully interact with their local economies. Innovation U should not claim sole credit for this shi7; it can, however, claim to have raised awareness in a few critical groups and helped build momentum for critical policies. Innovation U 2.0: Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy enters a very di8erent world than its predecessor. Government o6cials are questioning the role of universities in society. !e economic underpinnings of higher education, for universities and stu- dents, are stressed. Federal support for research is uncertain. Never have so many raised so many questions about the value, purpose, and impacts of higher education, at least in contemporary times. Amid all these questions, the strategies and practices encapsulated in this book present some answers. Innovation U institutions dramatically depict universities as creators of intellectual capital and economic growth. !ey show paths for universities to follow for larger impacts on their region. !e cases are not exhaustive, and certainly there are omissions. Volumes could be written about each university, and many others are accom- plishing remarkable feats. Dr. Lou Tornatzky and his colleagues—fueled not by remuneration, but by an intense belief in the economic power of universities—should be commended for their dedica- tion and quality product. Dr. Tornatzky recently retired from Cal Poly, and this project caps an illustrious career as a teacher, manager, and researcher in all things in technology and policy. Scott Doron Director Southern Technology Council Research Triangle Park North Carolina vii viii A)*"!'+$(,$-$"#% Financial and in-kind support from the following organizations were instrumental in enabling the execution of this project and the early dissemination of the "nal report: !e National Science Foundation, Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers Program (IIP-1140438) provided monetary support for the research team. !e William R. Kenan Jr. Institute for Engineering, Technology & Science provided monetary support for project execution including dissemination of the "nal report. !e Orfalea College of Business, California Polytechnic State University, supported Dr. Tornatzky’s sabbatical leave in Research Triangle Park, NC. !e North Carolina O6ce of Science and Technology provided logistical and dissemination support. !e State Science and Technology Institute featured a digital version of the report in its online newsletter, and sponsored a Webinair to present the project to its large constituency. !e Information Technology Innovation Foundation served as a dissemination partner and featured a digital version of the report in its online newsletter. North Carolina State University made o6ce space and support services available for Dr. Tornatzky during his sabbatical leave in Research Triangle Park. A number of individuals made in-kind contributions: Susan Opava, Paul Waugaman and Trent Williams were outstanding in their roles as “critical readers” of dra7 chapters, and suggesting corrections in grammar, style, and substance. Scott Doron, former Director of Southern Technology Council and a long-time collaborator, was a rock of intellectual and organizational contributions of inestimable value to the execution of this project. His faith in what we wanted to do, with no money to start with, kept us going. Denis Gray was one of the authors on the 2002 Innovation U book, but regrettably took a pass on being a co-author on this project. Nonetheless, over the past 18 months he has provided logistical, intellectual, and political assistance that has gone beyond the call of duty and expectations of friendship. He also was a signi"cant ix contributor in the key Introduction and Summary chapters, and co-designed and participated in the Case Selection process. Lynette Tornatzky put up with the senior author’s peaks of creative bliss and anguish, and contributed her graphic design skills to the format of the report. During the case selection process, eight very knowledgeable individuals provided valuable substantive input and contributions of their time as a Project Advisory Committee member: John W. Ahlen, President (retired), Arkansas Science and Technology Authority; Robert D. Atkinson, President, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation; Elizabeth Popp Berman, Associate Professor, University of Albany, SUNY; Barry Bozeman, Arizona Centennial Professor of Public Management and Technology Policy, Arizona State University; Dan Berglund, President & CEO, State Science & Technology Institute; Jacques Koppel, Principal, Koppel Group; Elliott Kulakowski, CEO, Society of Research Administrators International; and James J. Zuiches, Vice Chancellor (retired), North Carolina State University. x I"#&!(.)#/!"* !e suggestion that US universities do in each university case study; and (5) to describe more to pursue and optimize the potential case selection and analysis methodologies that were usefulness of the results of taxpayer-funded used, as well as ones that were avoided, and why. research is not an acclamation that US universities have failed. Instead, it is a I!!"#$%&"! U - '((' suggestion that they can improve and, in Twelve years ago a slim paperback volume was doing so, better advance economic growth completed and widely distributed by the Southern and human welfare. Paraphrasing "om Growth Policies Board (SGPB),1 located in elsewhere in this article, better than it Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. It was was is no excuse for failing to pursue or entitled Innovation U. New University Roles in a even achieve as good as
Recommended publications
  • Bernard M. Oliver Oral History Interview
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt658038wn Online items available Bernard M. Oliver Oral History Interview Daniel Hartwig Stanford University. Libraries.Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford, California November 2010 Copyright © 2015 The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Bernard M. Oliver Oral History SCM0111 1 Interview Overview Call Number: SCM0111 Creator: Oliver, Bernard M., 1916- Title: Bernard M. Oliver oral history interview Dates: 1985-1986 Physical Description: 0.02 Linear feet (1 folder) Summary: Transcript of an interview conducted by Arthur L. Norberg covering Oliver's early life, his education, and work experiences at Bell Laboratories and Hewlett-Packard. Subjects include television research, radar, information theory, organizational climate and objectives at both companies, Hewlett-Packard's associations with Stanford University, and Oliver's association with William Hewlett and David Packard. Language(s): The materials are in English. Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Information about Access Reproduction is prohibited. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Possibilities
    NONPROFIT ORG THE HEINZ ENDOWMENTS issue 2 2015 SPECIAL EDITION: p4 PITTSBURGH US POSTAGE Howard Heinz Endowment Vira I. Heinz Endowment PAID 625 Liberty Avenue PITTSBURGH PA 30th Floor PERMIT NO 57 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3115 The Power of 412.281.5777 Possibilities www.heinz.org Pittsburgh leaders envision a brighter, more sustainable future for the city, and they are drawing on inspiration from across the globe to develop strategies that will make the transformation a reality. Hard at play. page 40 This magazine was printed on Opus Dull, which has among the highest post-consumer waste content of any premium coated paper. Opus is third-party certifi ed according to the chain-of-custody standards of FSC®. The electricity used to make it comes from Green e-certifi ed renewable energy. BOROUGH BOOSTS NEIGHBORHOOD RE-CREATION MONEY MATTERS PLAY TIME 55541_cvrC2.indd541_cvrC2.indd 1 77/28/15/28/15 55:00:00 AMAM 43 BOARD AND STAFF RECOGNITIONS THE ECONOMIC GAP Dr. Shirley Malcom, a Heinz Endowments board member, Two separate reports released earlier this year was one of fi ve people from across the country selected by U.S. revealed the ongoing socioeconomic disparities News & World Report for the 2015 STEM Leadership Hall of experienced by minorities, particularly African Fame. Dr. Malcom is head of education and human resources programs for the American Association for the Advancement Americans, in the Pittsburgh region. “Pittsburgh’s of Science. She and the other honorees were recognized as Racial Demographics 2015: Differences and inspirational leaders who have achieved measurable results Disparities,” a Heinz Endowments–funded in the science, technology, engineering and math fi elds; inside study produced by the University of challenged established processes and conventional wisdom; Pittsburgh’s Center on Race and Social and motivated aspiring STEM professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Factbook Section Dividers Font Size 38 and 35 2008 09.Indd
    History, Mission, and Organization Table of Contents History, Mission, and Organization About Carnegie Mellon University 1.1 University Vision, Mission, and Values 1.2 Carnegie Mellon University History 1.3 Seven Colleges 1.6 Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar 1.7 Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley 1.7 Federally Funded Research and Development Center 1.7 Research Centers and Institutes 1.8 Accreditations by College and Department 1.10 University Organizational Chart 1.11 University Administration 1.16 Board of Trustees 1.16 About Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon has rapidly evolved into an internationally recognized institution with a distinctive mix of world-class educational and research programs in computer science, robotics, engineering, the sciences, business, public policy, fine arts, and the humanities. More than 11,000 undergraduate and graduate students at Carnegie Mellon receive an education characterized by its focus on creating and implementing solutions for real problems, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovation. A small student-to-faculty ratio provides an opportunity for close interaction between students and professors. Jared L. Cohon became Carnegie Mellon’s eighth president in July 1997 and has led the university along a trajectory of innovation and growth. In October 2008, he announced the public phase of “Inspire Innovation: The Campaign for Carnegie Mellon University,” a comprehensive campaign that is focused on building the university’s endowment; supporting faculty, students, and innovative research; and enhancing the physical campus with equipment and facility improvements. Carnegie Mellon’s strategic plan, developed in 2008, aims to guide the university in several core areas including education and student life, research and artistic creation, regional impact, and international initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanoscale Transistors Fall 2006 Mark Lundstrom Electrical
    SURF Research Talk, June 16, 2015 Along for the Ride – reflections on the past, present, and future of nanoelectronics Mark Lundstrom [email protected] Electrical and Computer Engineering Birck Nanotechnology Center Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana USA Lundstrom June 2015 what nanotransistors have enabled “If someone from the 1950’s suddenly appeared today, what would be the most difficult thing to explain to them about today?” “I possess a device in my pocket that is capable of assessing the entirety of information known to humankind.” “I use it to look at pictures of cats and get into arguments with strangers.” Curious, by Ian Leslie, 2014. transistors The basic components of electronic systems. >100 billion transistors Lundstrom June 2015 transistors "The transistor was probably the most important invention of the 20th Century, and the story behind the invention is one of clashing egos and top secret research.” -- Ira Flatow, Transistorized! http://www.pbs.org/transistor/ Lundstrom June 2015 “The most important moment since mankind emerged as a life form.” Isaac Asimov (speaking about the “planar process” used to manufacture ICs - - invented by Jean Hoerni, Fairchild Semiconductor, 1959). IEEE Spectrum Dec. 2007 Lundstrom June 2015 Integrated circuits "In 1957, decades before Steve Jobs dreamed up Apple or Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook, a group of eight brilliant young men defected from the Shockley Semiconductor Company in order to start their own transistor business…” Silicon Valley: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/films/silicon/
    [Show full text]
  • Marye Anne Fox Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8fn19bp No online items Marye Anne Fox Papers Finding aid prepared by Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, California, 92093-0175 858-534-2533 [email protected] Copyright 2014 Marye Anne Fox Papers MSS 0764 1 Descriptive Summary Title: Marye Anne Fox Papers Identifier/Call Number: MSS 0764 Contributing Institution: Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, California, 92093-0175 Languages: English Physical Description: 2.0 Linear feet (5 archives boxes) Date (inclusive): 1969 - 2011 Abstract: The papers of physical organic chemist Marye Anne Fox, documenting her career as a researcher and professor. The collection dates from 1969-2011 and includes reprints, teaching files, subject files, notebooks, and grant proposals. Creator: Fox, Marye Anne, 1947- Scope and Content of Collection The papers of Marye Anne Fox, seventh chancellor of UC San Diego and National Medal of Science laureate, document her career as a researcher and professor of physical organic chemistry. The collection dates from 1969-2011 and is arranged in five series: 1) REPRINTS, 2) TEACHING FILES, 3) SUBJECT FILES, 4) NOTEBOOKS and 5) GRANT PROPOSALS. SERIES 1: REPRINTS The REPRINTS series contains most of Fox's published scientific articles from 1970-1999, arranged chronologically, including collaborative works with other researchers. Her research in the fields of organic photochemistry and electrochemistry has applications in solar energy, semiconductors, functional polymers, and environmental chemistry. SERIES 2: TEACHING FILES The TEACHING FILES series (1969-1993) includes notes, syllabi, problem sets, exam questions and departmental memoranda used by Fox while teaching advanced organic chemistry and photochemistry at the University of Texas, Austin.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Organization Table of Contents
    History and Organization Table of Contents History and Organization Carnegie Mellon University History Carnegie Mellon Colleges, Branch Campuses, and Institute Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley Software Engineering Institute Research Centers and Institutes Accreditations by College and Department Carnegie Mellon University History Introduction The story of Carnegie Mellon University is unique and remarkable. After its founding in 1900 as the Carnegie Technical Schools, serving workers and young men and women of the Pittsburgh area, it became the degree-granting Carnegie Institute of Technology in 1912. “Carnegie Tech,” as it was known, merged with the Mellon Institute to become Carnegie Mellon University in 1967. Carnegie Mellon has since soared to national and international leadership in higher education—and it continues to be known for solving real-world problems, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovation. The story of the university’s famous founder—Andrew Carnegie—is also remarkable. A self-described “working-boy” with an “intense longing” for books, Andrew Carnegie emigrated from Scotland with his family in 1848 and settled in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He became a self-educated entrepreneur, whose Carnegie Steel Company grew to be the world’s largest producer of steel by the end of the nineteenth century. On November 15, 1900, Andrew Carnegie formally announced: “For many years I have nursed the pleasing thought that I might be the fortunate giver of a Technical Institute to our City, fashioned upon the best models, for I know of no institution which Pittsburgh, as an industrial centre, so much needs.” He concluded with the words “My heart is in the work,” which would become the university’s official motto.
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Telegraphy and Radio Wireless Information Network and National Broadcast System
    Wireless Telegraphy and Radio Wireless Information Network and National Broadcast System CEE 102: Prof. Michael G. Littman Course Administrator: Hiba Abdel-Jaber [email protected] Computers allowed for NOTETAKING ONLY Please - NO Cell Phones, Texting, Internet use 1 Consumer Goods 1900 - 1980 Economics and Politics 2 Consumer Goods 1900 - 1980 RMS Titanic with Marconi Antenna Economics and Politics 3 Marconi - Wireless messages at sea RMS Titanic with Marconi Antenna 4 transmitter receiver Marconi - Wireless messages at sea Heinrich Hertz’s Experiment - 1888 § Spark in transmitter initiates radio burst § Spark in receiver ring detects radio burst 5 transmitter receiver DEMO Marconi - Wireless messages at sea Heinrich Hertz’s Experiment - 1888 § Spark in transmitter initiates radio burst § Spark in receiver ring detects radio burst 6 transmitter receiver Heinrich Hertz’s Experiment - 1888 § Spark in transmitter initiates radio burst § Spark in receiver ring detects radio burst 7 Electromagnetic Wave wave-speed frequency wavelength Time or Length 8 Electromagnetic Wave wave-speed frequency Wireless Telegraph Hertz Discovery wavelength Marconi Patents Marconi Demonstrations Time or Length 9 Marconi’s Wireless Telegraph Wireless Telegraph Hertz Discovery Marconi Patents Marconi Demonstrations 10 Marconi’s Wireless Telegraph Wireless Telegraph Hertz Discovery DEMO Marconi Patents Marconi Demonstrations 11 Marconi’s Wireless Telegraph 12 13 Marconi’s Patent for Tuning coherer 14 Tuning Circuit Marconi’s Patent for Tuning L C coherer 1 1 ν = 2π LC 15 Transmitting antenna Marconi’s Patent for Tuning coherer Cornwall (England) 16 KITE Receiving antenna Transmitting antenna Saint John’s (Newfoundland) Cornwall (England) …..dot……….……dot……......…….dot…... December 12, 1901 17 KITE Receiving antenna Saint John’s (Newfoundland) Marconi gets Nobel Prize in 1909 …..dot……….……dot……......…….dot…..
    [Show full text]
  • THE INAUGURATION of FARNAM JAHANIAN
    THE INAUGURATION of FARNAM JAHANIAN AS THE 10TH PRESIDENT OF CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 26, 2018 2 #CMUFARNAM TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 About Farnam Jahanian 4 Investiture Ceremony Program 6 Keynote Speakers 8 Performers 10 Ceremonial Traditions 12 Board of Trustees 14 University Leadership 15 Past Presidents 16 Inauguration Performers 18 University Delegates 19 Alma Mater INVESTITURE CEREMONY 1 FARNAM JAHANIAN President, Henry L. Hillman President’s Chair Farnam Jahanian was appointed the 10th president of Carnegie Mellon University by its Board of Trustees in March 2018. He was previously the university’s provost and later served as interim president from July 2017 to February 2018. A nationally recognized computer scientist, entrepreneur, public servant and higher education leader, Jahanian brings to CMU extensive leadership and administrative expertise, not only in advancing research and education within and across disciplines, but also in translating research into technologies and practices that benefit society. He first joined CMU as vice president for research in 2014, where he was responsible for nurturing excellence in research, scholarship and creative activities. In his role as 2 #CMUFARNAM provost and chief academic officer from May 2015 to June 2017, Jahanian had broad responsibility for leading CMU’s schools, colleges, institutes and campuses and was instrumental in long-range institutional and academic planning and implementation. Prior to coming to CMU, Jahanian led the National Science Foundation Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE) from 2011 to 2014. He guided CISE, with a budget of almost $900 million, in its mission to advance scientific discovery and engineering innovation through its support of fundamental research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Life
    Second Annual John H. Chafee Memorial Lecture on Science and the Environment The Future of Life Dr. Edward O. Wilson Pellegrino University Research Professor, Harvard University December 6, 2001 THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT (NCSE) has been working since 1990 to improve the scientific basis of environmental decisionmaking and has earned an impressive reputa- tion for objectivity, responsibility, and achievement. The Council envisions a society where environmental decisions are based on an accurate understanding of the underlying science, its meaning, and its limitations. In such a society, citizens and decisionmakers receive accurate, understandable, and integrated science-based information. They understand the risks, uncertainties, and potential consequences of their action or inaction. Supported by over 500 academic, scientific, environmental, and business organizations, and federal, state, and local government, NCSE works closely with the many communities creating and using environmental knowledge to make and shape environmental decisions. The Council operates a range of innovative activities in the areas of: Promoting Science for the Environment The Council played an instrumental role in stimulating the National Science Foundation initiative to triple its annual budget for environmental research, education, and scientific assessment. The Council presents expert testimony to Congressional committees, consults regularly with key decisionmakers in government, and works to promote funding for environmental programs at numerous federal agencies. Enhancing Programs at Institutions of Higher Learning NCSE brings members of the academic community together to improve their environmental programs and increase their value to society through the University Affiliate Program, the Council of Environ- mental Deans and Directors, and the Minority Programs Office.
    [Show full text]
  • INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION 901 North Stuart Street, Arlington
    INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION 901 North Stuart Street, Arlington, VA 22203 Phone, 703-841-3800 Board of Directors: ........ Chairman ........Frank D. Yturria Vice Chairman ........James R. Whelan Directors ........Mark Schneider, Anne Brownell Sloane, Norton Stevens, Paul E. Sussman, Alexander F. Watson, (2 vacancies) Staff: ........ President ........George A. Evans Executive Vice President ........(vacancy) Vice President for Programs ........Linda Borst Vice President for Learning and Dissemination ........Anne Ternes Vice President for Financial Management and Systems ........Winsome Wells, Acting General Counsel ........Adolfo A. Franco The Inter-American Foundation is an independent Federal agency that supports social and economic development in Latin America and the Caribbean. It makes grants primarily to private, indigenous organizations that carry out self-help projects benefiting po or people. The Inter-American Foundation was created by Congress in 1969 (22 U.S.C. 290f) to support the self-help efforts of poor people in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Foundation was established because of congressional concern that traditional p rograms of development assistance were not reaching poor people. Instead of working through governments, the Foundation responds directly to the initiatives of the poor by supporting local and private organizations. Approximately 75 percent of the Foundat ion's funds are derived from congressional appropriations and the remainder from the Social Progress Trust Fund of the Inter-American Development Bank. The Foundation is governed by a nine-member Board of Directors appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. By law, six members of the Board are from private organizations and three are from the Government. The Foundation has made 3,642 grants, totaling over $385 million in 36 countries of Latin America and the Caribbean.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Business New Business
    Division of Zoning and Development Review City of Pittsburgh, Department of City Planning 200 Ross Street, Third Floor Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 Minutes of the Meeting of February 3, 2016 Beginning at 12:30 PM 200 Ross Street First Floor Hearing Room Pittsburgh, PA 15219 In Attendance: Members Staff Others Joe Serrao Sarah Quinn Greg Maynes Carole Malakoff John Francona Carol Peterson Sharon Spooner Pat Russell Charles Heidlage Darren Toth Raymond Gastil David J. Barton Gregory D. Cox Amy Bentz Ernie Hogan Paul D. Taylor Brett Mahaffey Ryan Kabana Matthew Falcone Kathleen Hagan Taafui Kamara Lindsay Patross Bob Baumbach Joshua Speakman Andrew Reichert Melissa McSwigan Jim McMullen Michael Albright Joel Bernard Alissa Martin Jeb Jungwirth Heather Kitson Susan Brandt Brian Bevan Tom Mangan JoAnn Patross Katy Sawyer David Conrad Janine Jelks-Seale Ryan Morden Abass B. Kamara Old Business Mexican War Streets Art Guidelines: 1. Ms. Quinn states that she repeatedly offered to help to get something together for the Commission’s Jan 1st deadline, which has now passed. She states that she is looking for some guidance on how to handle it and suggests that they think about it for the next meeting. She states that Manchester is also interested in potentially updating their guidelines. 2. Mr. Hogan asks if all of the neighborhood guidelines will be updated. 3. Ms. Quinn says yes, that would be her hope, but it would need to come from within. 4. Mr. Hogan states that the Commission will need some guidance from staff to how to approach this as far as having discussions with the districts, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Amateur Radio at Stanford ITS ROLE in COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
    Amateur Radio at Stanford ITS ROLE IN COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE 1927 2021 D. B. Leeson, W6NL April 13, 2021 © W6YX via Zoom History – A Guide to the Future § Decision Tree – Life, Career, Education, Business › Chain of contingent events, in competition › Each step depends on prior decisions & environment § Strategy – Optimize Choices › Strategy – Plan before objective is in view › Tactics – Carry out strategy after objective is at hand § Study Paths of Others – A Guide to Choices › Identify their strategies – See how it worked out › I focus on history, but can apply to present 1 Strategy Ideas & Examples § Significant Strategic Concepts › Limit competition – Segments & differentiation § Radio Technology is Unique › A differentiating skill – Then & now § Amateur Radio Experience › An engaging exercise in radio technology • Making and operating CubeSat Microwave › Basis of culture & key events – Stanford & Silicon Valley § History Examples Bear This Out › Career & institutional successes have flowed from amateur radio Moonbounce “EME” Amateur Digital Worldwide CubeSats in space 2 Elements of Competitive Strategy § Segmentation – Part of Customers/Market with Defining Limits › Limit competition – By location, experiences, technology, organization › Fortress concept – Safe inside, no advantage outside • Compete where you can win § Differentiation – Strength Against Others in Segment › Identify needed advantages – Singular skills, relationships, culture, location › Build from experience – Learn from self, colleagues, mentors • Experiences in one
    [Show full text]