Victoria Espinel Speaks About Intellectual Property Concerns Influx
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Higher Ed in Transition
THE MAGAZINE OF THE MASTER BUILDERS’ ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA JULY/AUGUST 2016 Higher Ed in Transition Mid-Year Results The Trend in Student Housing CMU’s New Scott Hall What to Expect from the Cracker STONE VENEER CLAY BRICK HARDSCAPE MASONRY Carnegie Mellon University Sherman and Joyce Bowie Scott Hall Congratulations to CMU on their new Sherman and Joyce Bowie Scott Hall. A 100,000 SF building, home for Nano Fabrication, Wilton E. Scott Institute for Energy Innovation and a new campus location for the Biomedical Engineering Department. Jendoco is a proud partner of CMU Carnegie Mellon University Industry Intelligence. Focused Legal Perspective. HIGH-YIELDING RESULTS. Meet our construction attorneys at babstcalland.com. Whether it’s negotiating a construction contract, litigating a mechanics’ lien or bond claim, resolving bid protests or dealing with delay, inefficiency, or acceleration claims, we help solve legal problems in ways that impact your business and add value to your bottom line. PITTSBURGH, PA I CHARLESTON, WV I STATE COLLEGE, PA I WASHINGTON, DC I CANTON, OH I SEWELL, NJ Babst_Construction_DEVPGH_8.625x11.125.indd 1 3/6/16 9:41 PM Contents2016 PUBLISHER Tall Timber Group www.talltimbergroup.com EDITOR Jeff Burd 412-366-1857 Cover image: [email protected] Carnegie Mellon’s Scott Hall. PRODUCTION Carson Publishing, Inc. Kevin J. Gordon ART DIRECTOR/GRAPHIC DESIGN Carson Publishing, Inc. Jaimee D. Greenawalt CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Anna Burd CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHY Tall Timber Group Master Builders’ Association -
Karen Bradley Clay Curriculum Vitae July 2018
Karen Bradley Clay Curriculum Vitae July 2018 Contact Information Heinz School of Public Policy and Management Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 412-268-4197 (office) [email protected] http://www.heinz.cmu.edu/~kclay/ Citizenship: United States, Canada Research Interests Environmental Economics, Energy Economics, Economic History, Health Economics Education Ph.D. Economics, Stanford University, 1994. B.A. with Highest Honors, Economics, University of Virginia, 1988. Professional Experience 2016-present Professor of Economics and Public Policy, Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Tepper School of Business (courtesy), and Engineering and Public Policy (courtesy), Carnegie Mellon University 2008-2016 Associate Professor of Economics and Public Policy, Heinz School of Public Policy and Management and Tepper School of Business (courtesy), Carnegie Mellon University 2018-present Senior Fellow, Scott Institute for Energy Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University 2012-present National Bureau for Economic Research, Research Associate, Development of the American Economy (Faculty Research Fellow, 2010-2012.) Research Associate, Energy and Environmental Economics, 2015-present 2011-present Affiliated Faculty, University of Pittsburgh Law School 2008-2009 Visiting Scholar, Stanford Law School 1999-2008 Assistant Professor of Economics and Public Policy, Heinz School of Public Policy and Management and Tepper School of Business (courtesy), Carnegie Mellon University 1998-1999 Visiting Assistant Professor, Heinz School -
Factbook Section Dividers Font Size 38 and 35 2008 09.Indd
History, Mission, and Organization Table of Contents History, Mission, and Organization About Carnegie Mellon University 1.1 University Vision, Mission, and Values 1.2 Carnegie Mellon University History 1.3 Seven Colleges 1.6 Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar 1.7 Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley 1.7 Federally Funded Research and Development Center 1.7 Research Centers and Institutes 1.8 Accreditations by College and Department 1.10 University Organizational Chart 1.11 University Administration 1.16 Board of Trustees 1.16 About Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon has rapidly evolved into an internationally recognized institution with a distinctive mix of world-class educational and research programs in computer science, robotics, engineering, the sciences, business, public policy, fine arts, and the humanities. More than 11,000 undergraduate and graduate students at Carnegie Mellon receive an education characterized by its focus on creating and implementing solutions for real problems, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovation. A small student-to-faculty ratio provides an opportunity for close interaction between students and professors. Jared L. Cohon became Carnegie Mellon’s eighth president in July 1997 and has led the university along a trajectory of innovation and growth. In October 2008, he announced the public phase of “Inspire Innovation: The Campaign for Carnegie Mellon University,” a comprehensive campaign that is focused on building the university’s endowment; supporting faculty, students, and innovative research; and enhancing the physical campus with equipment and facility improvements. Carnegie Mellon’s strategic plan, developed in 2008, aims to guide the university in several core areas including education and student life, research and artistic creation, regional impact, and international initiatives. -
Universities and Innovation Ecosystems: a Dynamic Capabilities Perspective Sohvi Heaton,1,* Donald S
Industrial and Corporate Change, 2019, 1–19 doi: 10.1093/icc/dtz038 Original article Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icc/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/icc/dtz038/5526923 by Loyola Marymount University user on 08 July 2019 Universities and innovation ecosystems: a dynamic capabilities perspective Sohvi Heaton,1,* Donald S. Siegel,2 and David J. Teece3 1College of Business, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045-2659, USA. e-mail: [email protected], 2School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004-0687, USA. e-mail: [email protected] and 3Institute for Business Innovation, Haas School of Business, U.C. Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1234, USA. e-mail: [email protected] *Main author for correspondence. Abstract Universities play an important role in innovation ecosystems. In addition to developing human capital and advancing technology, they are increasingly expected to participate as economic development partners with industry and local, state, and national governments. Models such as the “Triple Helix” have been advanced to frame the assessment of interactions among academia, industry, and govern- ments that may foster economic development. Such models highlight the boundary-spanning roles of universities and provide a predetermined list of actions universities could take to strengthen their eco- system. Unfortunately, the flexible and entrepreneurial management of universities required to make this model work has virtually been ignored in the academic literature. We propose the dynamic capa- bilities framework to guide how universities might manage their innovation ecosystems. We use this framework to analyze the role of the university throughout the ecosystem lifecycle. -
Department of Homeland Security Daily Open Source Infrastructure
Daily Open Source Infrastructure Report 24 April 2012 Top Stories • A Costa Rican company agreed to plead guilty in court in Virginia to a $670 million global insurance fraud scheme. – Associated Press (See item 11) • More than 160,000 bridges in the United States are either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, according to a new report by a national civil engineers’ group. – Homeland Security News Wire (See item 14) • Contrary to recent reports, the Flashback botnet that mounted the first ever successful malware attack against Apple’s OS X is growing. The infection count was estimated to be 650,000 machines as of April 20. – Computerworld (See item 43) • After two deadly booby traps were discovered by a U.S. Forest Service officer along a popular walking trail in Provo Canyon in Utah, two men were taken into custody. – NewsCore (See item 51) Fast Jump Menu PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES SERVICE INDUSTRIES • Energy • Banking and Finance • Chemical • Transportation • Nuclear Reactors, Materials and Waste • Postal and Shipping • Critical Manufacturing • Information Technology • Defense Industrial Base • Communications • Dams • Commercial Facilities SUSTENANCE and HEALTH FEDERAL and STATE • Agriculture and Food • Government Facilities • Water • Emergency Services • Public Health and Healthcare • National Monuments and Icons - 1 - Energy Sector Current Electricity Sector Threat Alert Levels: Physical: LOW, Cyber: LOW Scale: LOW, GUARDED, ELEVATED, HIGH, SEVERE [Source: ISAC for the Electricity Sector (ES-ISAC) - [http://www.esisac.com] 1. April 23, Reuters – (National) Winter returns with a blast as snow pounds U.S. Northeast. A snowstorm struck a wide area of the Northeast April 23, raising the threat of downed trees and hazardous roads and causing scattered power outages in several states. -
Pittsburgh IT Cluster Is in Universities and Training Institutes, Instruments, Research Organizations, Software Development and Information Security
Professor Michael E. Porter, Harvard University Council on Competitiveness Monitor Group ontheFRONTIER Pittsburgh CLUSTERS OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE ATLANTA PITTSBURGH RESEARCH TRIANGLE SAN DIEGO WICHITA This report may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form beyond copying permitted by sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. copyright law and excerpts by reviewers for the public press, without written permission from the publishers. ISBN 1-889866-52-0 To download this report or learn more about the Clusters of Innovation Initiative, please visit www.compete.org or write to: Council on Competitiveness 1500 K Street, NW Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 682-4292 Fax: (202) 682-5150 Email: [email protected] Copyright ©April 2002 Council on Competitiveness Professor Michael E. Porter, Harvard University Monitor Group ontheFRONTIER Printed in the United States of America cover photo by John Wee Pittsburgh CLUSTERS OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE Professor Michael E. Porter, Harvard University Monitor Group ontheFRONTIER Council on Competitiveness CLUSTERS OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE: REGIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF U.S. COMPETITIVENESS CONTENTS Foreword by the Co-Chairs of the Clusters of Innovation Initiative . iv Acknowledgments . v National Steering Committee Members and Regional Advisors . vii Report Overview . .viii Highlights . .ix Executive Summary . xii Introduction . 1 1 Economic Competitiveness and Regional Innovative Capacity . 3 2 Regional Study Methodology . 14 3 Assessment of the Pittsburgh Regional Economy . 20 4 Competitiveness of Selected Clusters . 47 The Biotechnology / Pharmaceutical Cluster . 47 The Information Technology Cluster . 68 The Production Technology Cluster . .85 Sustaining Competitive Advantage: 5 Lessons, Challenges, and Opportunities . 103 Endnotes . 117 Appendices . 121 1. Definition of Measurements . -
History and Organization Table of Contents
History and Organization Table of Contents History and Organization Carnegie Mellon University History Carnegie Mellon Colleges, Branch Campuses, and Institute Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley Software Engineering Institute Research Centers and Institutes Accreditations by College and Department Carnegie Mellon University History Introduction The story of Carnegie Mellon University is unique and remarkable. After its founding in 1900 as the Carnegie Technical Schools, serving workers and young men and women of the Pittsburgh area, it became the degree-granting Carnegie Institute of Technology in 1912. “Carnegie Tech,” as it was known, merged with the Mellon Institute to become Carnegie Mellon University in 1967. Carnegie Mellon has since soared to national and international leadership in higher education—and it continues to be known for solving real-world problems, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovation. The story of the university’s famous founder—Andrew Carnegie—is also remarkable. A self-described “working-boy” with an “intense longing” for books, Andrew Carnegie emigrated from Scotland with his family in 1848 and settled in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He became a self-educated entrepreneur, whose Carnegie Steel Company grew to be the world’s largest producer of steel by the end of the nineteenth century. On November 15, 1900, Andrew Carnegie formally announced: “For many years I have nursed the pleasing thought that I might be the fortunate giver of a Technical Institute to our City, fashioned upon the best models, for I know of no institution which Pittsburgh, as an industrial centre, so much needs.” He concluded with the words “My heart is in the work,” which would become the university’s official motto. -
THE INAUGURATION of FARNAM JAHANIAN
THE INAUGURATION of FARNAM JAHANIAN AS THE 10TH PRESIDENT OF CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 26, 2018 2 #CMUFARNAM TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 About Farnam Jahanian 4 Investiture Ceremony Program 6 Keynote Speakers 8 Performers 10 Ceremonial Traditions 12 Board of Trustees 14 University Leadership 15 Past Presidents 16 Inauguration Performers 18 University Delegates 19 Alma Mater INVESTITURE CEREMONY 1 FARNAM JAHANIAN President, Henry L. Hillman President’s Chair Farnam Jahanian was appointed the 10th president of Carnegie Mellon University by its Board of Trustees in March 2018. He was previously the university’s provost and later served as interim president from July 2017 to February 2018. A nationally recognized computer scientist, entrepreneur, public servant and higher education leader, Jahanian brings to CMU extensive leadership and administrative expertise, not only in advancing research and education within and across disciplines, but also in translating research into technologies and practices that benefit society. He first joined CMU as vice president for research in 2014, where he was responsible for nurturing excellence in research, scholarship and creative activities. In his role as 2 #CMUFARNAM provost and chief academic officer from May 2015 to June 2017, Jahanian had broad responsibility for leading CMU’s schools, colleges, institutes and campuses and was instrumental in long-range institutional and academic planning and implementation. Prior to coming to CMU, Jahanian led the National Science Foundation Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE) from 2011 to 2014. He guided CISE, with a budget of almost $900 million, in its mission to advance scientific discovery and engineering innovation through its support of fundamental research. -
Transaction Cost Economics: the Natural Progression†
American Economic Review 100 (June 2010): 673–690 http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi 10.1257/aer.100.3.673 = Transaction Cost Economics: The Natural Progression† By Oliver E. Williamson* The research program on which I and others have been working has been variously described as the “economics of governance,” the “economics of organization,” and “transaction cost eco- nomics.” As discussed in Section I, governance is the overarching concept and transaction cost economics is the means by which to breathe operational content into governance and organization. The specific issue that drew me into this research project was the puzzle posed by Ronald Coase in 1937: What efficiency factors determine when a firm produces a good or service to its own needs rather than outsource? As described in Section II, my 1971 paper on “The Vertical Integration of Production” made headway with this issue and invited follow-on research that would eventually come to be referred to as transaction cost economics. The rudiments of transaction cost economics are set out in Section III. Puzzles and challenges that arose and would require “pushing the logic of efficient governance to completion” are examined briefly in Section IV. Concluding remarks follow. I. An Overview For economists, if not more generally, governance and organization are important if and as these are made susceptible to analysis. As described here, breathing operational content into the concept of governance would entail examining economic organization through the lens of con- tract rather than the neoclassical lens of choice , recognizing that this was an interdisciplinary ( ) project where economics and organization theory and, later, aspects of the law were joined, and ( ) introducing hitherto neglected transaction costs into the analysis. -
Implications for Therapy Do Scientists Understand the Public? Black Humor
american academy of arts & sciences summer 2010 Bulletin vol. lxiii, no. 4 Page 5 Do Scientists Understand the Public? An Essay by Chris Mooney based on a project with David Clark, Thomas Isaacs, David Altshuler, and Robert Fri Page 15 Advances in Brain Science: Implications for Therapy Emilio Bizzi, Edward Scolnick, and Robert Desimone Page 29 Black Humor: Reflections on an American Tradition Gerald Early, Glenda Carpio, and Werner Sollors with illustrations by Charles Johnson inside: Diplomats Discuss Nuclear Nonproliferation, Page 1 The Alternative Energy Future, Page 3 Projects on Science in American Society, Page 4 The Education of an American Dreamer by Peter G. Peterson and Peter Nicholas, Page 23 Calendar of Events Save the Date: Thursday, Saturday, September 16, 2010 November 13, 2010 Contents Meeting–Boston Meeting–Chicago Academy Projects in collaboration with Boston University in collaboration with the Chicago The Great American University Humanities Festival Update on The Global Nuclear Future Initiative: Diplomats Discuss Nuclear Speaker: Jonathan Cole, Columbia Part I: Reproductive Rights University Nonproliferation at Academy Time: 11:30 a.m. Meeting 1 Location: Boston University Speakers: Reva Siegel, Yale Law School; Gerald Rosenberg, University of Chicago; U.S. Policy toward Russia 2 Friday, Christine Stansell, University of Chicago; October 8, 2010 and Geoffrey Stone, University of Chicago New Study: The Alternative Energy Future 3 2010 Induction–Cambridge Part II: Censored!–The First Amendment, Celebrating the Arts -
Residential Handbook 2015–16 WELCOME
Residential Handbook 2015–16 WELCOME Welcome to University of Pittsburgh on-campus housing! Whether you are living in a residence hall, apartment-style accommodation, or fraternity complex, you are one of over 7,900 undergraduate students residing on campus, and your comfort and satisfaction are very important to us. It is our priority to ensure that your time in on-campus housing is one of many positive and rewarding experiences here at Pitt. The purpose of this Handbook is not only to provide you with a comprehensive reference for living on campus, but also to advise you of the policies for residing in University housing. This Handbook is not, and does not, create a contract. Upon electronically signing your Housing and Dining Services Contract (Contract), you agreed to, among other things, abide by the policies, rules, and regulations set forth in this Handbook and any other official University publications, including, but not limited to, the Student Code of Conduct and Judicial Procedures. Communal campus living can be a great college experience, but with your decision to do so comes a responsibility to abide by the rules necessary for the safety and enjoyment of all. With your cooperation, this goal will be met. This Handbook is divided into two sections. The first section (Everyday Living) addresses matters specifically related to your occupancy of University housing. The second section (Resources and Services) provides other useful information pertaining to the University. Each section has been organized alphabetically for easy reference. If you have any questions or need any additional assistance, please feel free to contact Panther Central at 412-648-1100, [email protected], or www.pc.pitt.edu. -
Julia R. Bursten
1017 Cathedral of Learning [email protected] Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Website TEL: 614-571-4216 Julia R. Bursten Education 2015 Ph.D. (expected), History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh 2010 MA, Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh 2008 BA, Philosophy, Rice University Honors Thesis: Selecting a Structure of Scientific Communication Advisor: Melinda Fagan Dissertation: Surfaces, Scales, and Synthesis: Reasoning at the Nanoscale Committee Robert Batterman, Chair Jill Millstone Sandra Mitchell John Norton Mark Wilson James Woodward Abstract Philosophers interested in scientific methodology have focused largely on physics, biology, and cognitive science. They have paid considerably less attention to sciences such as chemistry and nanoscience, where not only are the subjects distinct, but the very aims differ: chemistry and nanoscience center around synthesis. Methods associated with synthesis do not fit well with description, explanation, and prediction that so dominate aims in philosophers' paradigm sciences. In order to synthesize a substance or material, scientists need different kinds of information than they need to predict, explain, or describe. Consequently, they need different kinds of models and theories. Specifically, chemists need additional models of how reactions will proceed. In practice, this means chemists must model surface structure and behavior, because reactions occur on the surfaces of materials. Physics, and by extension much of philosophy of science, ignores the structure and behavior of surfaces, modeling surfaces only as \boundary conditions" with virtually no influence on material behavior. Such boundary conditions are not seen as part of the physical laws that govern material behavior, so little consid- eration has been given to their roles in improving scientists' understanding of materials and aiding synthesis.