DOCSLIB.ORG

IEA Wind Task 26: Offshore Wind Farm Baseline Documentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IEA Wind Task 26: Offshore Wind Farm Baseline Documentation IEA Wind Task 26 Offshore Wind Farm Baseline Documentation Gavin Smart: Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult Aaron Smith: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Ethan Warner: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Iver Bakken Sperstad: SINTEF Energy Research Bob Prinsen: TKI Wind Op Zee (by contract with EcoFys) Roberto Lacal-Arántegui: European Commission Joint Research Centre The IEA was founded in 1974 within the framework of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to collaborate on international energy programs and carry out a comprehensive program about energy among Member Countries. The IEA Wind implementing agreement functions within a framework created by the IEA. Views and findings within this report do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual member countries. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-6A20-66262 Golden, CO 80401 June 2016 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Available electronically at SciTech Connect http:/www.osti.gov/scitech Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 OSTI http://www.osti.gov Phone: 865.576.8401 Fax: 865.576.5728 Email: [email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Road Alexandria, VA 22312 NTIS http://www.ntis.gov Phone: 800.553.6847 or 703.605.6000 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: [email protected] NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content. Acknowledgements Special thanks to Maureen Hand (NREL), Volker Berkhout (Fraunhofer IWES), Aisma Vitina (EA Energy Analyses) and Jørgen Lemming (Danish Technical University) for detailed comments and input on earlier versions of this report. This report has been sponsored by the International Energy Agency (IEA) Wind Implementing Agreement (an IEA Technology Collaboration Programme) for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems (IEA Wind), and funded by the respective entities in the participating countries of Task 26-The Cost of Wind Energy, including Denmark, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, the European Commission, and the United States. The authors of this report would like to thank the IEA Wind Executive Committee members for supporting this work, particularly those members who sponsor the corresponding research in each of the participating countries. The IEA was founded in 1974 within the framework of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to collaborate on international energy programs and carry out a comprehensive program about energy among Member Countries. The IEA Wind implementing agreement functions within a framework created by the IEA. Views and findings within this report do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual member countries. Suggested Citation: Smart, G., A. Smith, E. Warner, I.B. Sperstad, B. Prinsen, R. Lacal-Arántegui. 2016. IEA Wind Task 26 – Offshore Wind Farm Baseline Documentation. IEA Wind. www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/66262.pdf iii This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. List of Abbreviations BoS balance of system CapEx capital expenditure CLV cable laying vessel CRMF Cost Monitoring Framework CTV crew transfer vessel DSV diving support vessel ECN Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands FID Final Investment Decision HLV heavy lift vessel km kilometre kV kilovolt LCOE levelised cost of energy m metre m/s metres per second MW megawatt MWh megawatt-hours NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory O&M operations & maintenance OpEx operating expenditure ORE Catapult Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult SINTEF SINTEF Energy Research t metric tonne TKI TKI Wind Op Zee WACC weighted average cost of capital yr year iv This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 1 2 Background ................................................................................................................................. 2 3 Baseline Definition Process ......................................................................................................... 2 4 Baseline Project Definition .......................................................................................................... 3 4.1 Wind Farm Assumptions ......................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Turbine Assumptions .............................................................................................................. 4 4.3 Balance of System Assumptions ............................................................................................. 5 4.4 O&M Assumptions .................................................................................................................. 6 4.5 Financing Assumptions ........................................................................................................... 8 4.6 Performance Assumptions ...................................................................................................... 9 5 Resulting Baseline Financial Model Inputs ............................................................................... 10 5.1 Annual Energy Production .................................................................................................... 10 5.2 CapEx ..................................................................................................................................... 10 5.3 OpEx ...................................................................................................................................... 11 6 LCOE Results .............................................................................................................................. 11 7 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................. 12 8 References ................................................................................................................................ 13 Appendix A. Wind Farms Installed in Northern Europe 2012–2014 ................................................. 14 Appendix B. Generic 4MW Power Curve Rev. 2 ................................................................................ 17 Appendix C. Detailed O&M Modelling Comparison .......................................................................... 18 C.1 O&M Models ......................................................................................................................... 18 C.2 O&M Input Data Assumptions .............................................................................................. 19 C.3 O&M Scenario Representation ............................................................................................. 23 C.4 Fixed Operations Costs ......................................................................................................... 25 C.5 Detailed O&M results ........................................................................................................... 27 v This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. List of Tables Table 1: Baseline CapEx Summary .......................................................................................................... 1 Table 2: Baseline OpEx Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Table 3: Baseline Energy Output ............................................................................................................. 2 Table 4: Task 26 Baseline Project Description ........................................................................................ 3 Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Horns Rev 2 Offshore Wind Farm Bird Monitoring Program 2010-2012
    Dong Energy A/S Horns Rev 2 Offshore Wind Farm Bird Monitoring Program 2010-2012 BIRD MIGRATION Dong Energy A/S Horns Rev 2 Offshore Wind Farm Bird Monitoring Program 2010-2012 BIRD MIGRATION Client Dong Energy A/S att. Birte Hansen Kraftværksvej 53 DK-7000 Fredericia Consultants Orbicon A/S Jens Juuls Vej 16 8260 Viby J DHI A/S Agern Allé 2 2970 Hørsholm Project ID 1321000072 Document 1321000075-03-003 Project manager Simon B. Leonhard Authors Henrik Skov, Simon B. Leonhard, Stefan Heinänen, Ramunas Zydelis, Niels Einar Jensen, Jan Durinck, Thomas W. Johansen, Bo P. Jensen, Brian L. Hansen, Werner Piper, Per N. Grøn Checked by Bo Svenning Pedersen Version 3 Approved by Lars Sloth Issued date December 2012 Data sheet Title: Horns Rev 2 Monitoring 2010-2012. Migrating Birds. Authors: Henrik Skov2, Simon B. Leonhard1, Stefan Heinänen2, Ramunas Zydelis2, Niels Einar Jensen2, Jan Durinck3, Thomas W. Johansen3, Bo P. Jensen2, Brian L. Hansen2, Werner Piper4, Per N. Grøn1. Institutions: 1Orbicon A/S, Jens Juuls Vej 16, DK-8260 Viby J, Denmark; 2DHI, Agern Allé 5, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark; 3Marine Observers, Svankjærvej 6, DK-7752 Snested, Denmark; 4Biola, Gotenstrasse 4, D-20097 Hamburg Germany. Publisher: Horns Rev II A/S. Kraftværksvej 53, DK-7000 Fredericia, Denmark. Year: 2012 Version: 3 Report to be cited: Skov H.; Leonhard, S.B.; Heinänen, S.; Zydelis, R.; Jensen, N.E.; Durinck, J.; Johansen, T.W.; Jensen, B.P.; Hansen, B.L.; Piper, W.; Grøn, P.N. 2012. Horns Rev 2 Monitoring 2010-2012. Migrating Birds. Orbicon, DHI, Marine Observers and Biola.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6.1: List of Cumulative Projects
    Appendix 6.1 Long list of cumulative projects considered within the EIA Report GoBe Consultants Ltd. March 2018 List of Cumulative Appendix 6.1 Projects 1 Firth of Forth and Tay Offshore Wind Farms Inch Cape Offshore Wind (as described in the decision notices of Scottish Ministers dated 10th October 2014 and plans referred to therein and as proposed in the Scoping Report submitted to MS-LOT in May 2017) The consented project will consist of up to 110 wind turbines and generating up to 784 MW situated East of the Angus Coast in the outer Forth and Tay. It is being developed by Inch Cape Offshore Windfarm Ltd (ICOL). This project was consented in 2014, but was subject to Judicial Review proceedings (see section 1.4.1.1 of the EIA Report for full details) which resulted in significant delays. Subsequently ICOL requested a Scoping Opinion for a new application comprising of 75 turbines with a generating capacity of 784 MW. Project details can be accessed at: http://www.inchcapewind.com/home Seagreen Alpha and Bravo (as described in the decision notices of Scottish Ministers dated 10th October 2014 and plans referred to therein and as Proposed in the Scoping Report submitted to MS-LOT in May 2017) The consents for this project includes two offshore wind farms, being developed by Seagreen Wind Energy Limited (SWEL), each consisting of up to 75 wind turbines and generating up to 525 MW. This project was consented in 2014, but was subject to Judicial Review proceedings (see section 1.4.1.1 of the EIA Report for full details) which resulted in significant delays.
    [Show full text]
  • The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm
    The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm A Popular Initiative 1 Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm Number of turbines............. 20 x 2 MW Installed Power.................... 40 MW Hub height......................... 64 metres Rotor diameter................... 76 metres Total height........................ 102 metres Foundation depth................ 4 to 8 metres Foundation weight (dry)........ 1,800 tonnes Wind speed at 50-m height... 7.2 m/s Expected production............ 100 GWh/y Production 2002................. 100 GWh (wind 97% of normal) Park efficiency.................... 93% Construction year................ 2000 Investment......................... 48 mill. EUR Kastrup Airport The Middelgrunden Wind Farm is situated a few kilometres away from the centre of Copenhagen. The offshore turbines are connected by cable to the transformer at the Amager power plant 3.5 km away. Kongedybet Hollænderdybet Middelgrunden Saltholm Flak 2 From Idea to Reality The idea of the Middelgrunden wind project was born in a group of visionary people in Copenhagen already in 1993. However it took seven years and a lot of work before the first cooperatively owned offshore wind farm became a reality. Today the 40 MW wind farm with twenty modern 2 MW wind turbines developed by the Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative and Copenhagen Energy Wind is producing electricity for more than 40,000 households in Copenhagen. In 1996 the local association Copenhagen Environment and Energy Office took the initiative of forming a working group for placing turbines on the Middelgrunden shoal and a proposal with 27 turbines was presented to the public. At that time the Danish Energy Authority had mapped the Middelgrunden shoal as a potential site for wind development, but it was not given high priority by the civil servants and the power utility.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks
    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Working at Heights
    COMMUNICATION HUB FOR THE WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY SPECIALIST SURVEYING WORKING AT HEIGHTS LAW SPOTLIGHT ON TYNE & TEES APRIL/MAY 2013 | £5.25 INTRODUCTION ‘SPOTLIGHT’ ON THE TYNE & THE TEES CONTINUING OUR SUCCESSFUL REGULAR FEATURES company/organisation micropage held ‘Spotlight On’ featureS WE We can boast no fewer than 9 separate within our website, so that you can learn AGAIN VISIT THE TYNE & TEES features within this edition. Some much more in all sorts of formats. AS ‘an area of excellence are planned and can be found in our IN THE WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY ‘Forthcoming Features’ tab on our These have already become very popular THROUGHOUT EUROPE AND website – we do however react to editorial as it links the printed magazine in a very beyond’ received, which we believe is important interactive way – a great marketing tool to the industry and create new features to for our decision making readership to The area is becoming more and more suit. find out about products and services important to the wind energy industry. immediately following the reading of an As you will see the depth and breadth Therefore please do not hesitate to let us interesting article. Contact the commercial of the companies and organisations know about any subject area which you department to find out how to get one for who have contributed to this feature do feel is important to the continued progress your company. not disappoint. of the industry and we will endeavour to bring it to the fore. The feature boasts the largest page Click to view more info count so far which stretches over 40 WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY SKILLS GAP pages! – initiative update = Click to view video I year ago we reported that there were 4 COLLABORATION AND THE VESSEL main areas to focus on if we are to satisfy CO-OPERATIVE that need and would include a focused Our industry lead article in this edition approach in the following areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 590 14 January 2015 No. 91 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 14 January 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 849 14 JANUARY 2015 850 tight process. I will publish the draft clauses before House of Commons 25 August—sorry, I mean 25 January, which is, incidentally, before 25 August. With 25 January being a Sunday, we Wednesday 14 January 2015 might even meet the deadline with a few days to spare. Angus Robertson: Until now, the UK Government’s The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock position has been to remove the right of Scottish householders to object to unconventional gas or oil drilling underneath their homes. What will the position PRAYERS be between now and the full devolution of powers over fracking? Will the Department of Energy and Climate [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Change give an undertaking that it will not issue any fresh licences? Mr Carmichael: The position will be as it is at the Oral Answers to Questions moment, which is that if there is any fracking project in Scotland, the hon. Gentleman’s colleagues in the Scottish Government will have the power, using planning or environmental regulations, to block it. They should not SCOTLAND seek to push the blame on to anyone else. The Secretary of State was asked— 11. [906928] Cathy Jamieson (Kilmarnock and Loudoun) (Lab/Co-op): I welcome what the Secretary of State has Shale Gas said.
    [Show full text]
  • G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to New Values (Information Received As at End of 2010 - Date of Latest Updates Shown for Each Network.)
    G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to new Values (Information received as at End of 2010 - Date of latest updates shown for each network.) DNO [Western Power Distribution - South West Area] total responses as at 05/01/11 User Data Entry Under Frequency Over Frequency Generator Generator Generator Changes Generator Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2 Agreed to capacity capacity capacity changes Site name Genset implemented capacity unable Frequency Frequency Frequency Frequency Comments changes (Y/N) installed agreed to implemented (Y/N) to change (MW) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (MW) change (MW) (MW) Scottish and Southern Energy, Cantelo Nurseries, Bradon Farm, Isle Abbots, Taunton, Somerset Gas Y Y 9.7 9.7 9.7 0.0 47.00 50.50 Following Settings have been applied: 47.5Hz 20s, 47Hz 0.5s, 52Hz 0.5s Bears Down Wind Farm Ltd, Bears Down Wind Farm, St Mawgan, Newquay, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y N 9.6 9.6 0.0 0.0 47.00 50.50 Contact made. Awaiting info. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz 0.5s) - British Gas Transco, Severn Road, Avonmouth, Bristol Gas Y Y 5.5 5.5 5.5 0.0 47.00 50.50 complete 23/11/10 Cold Northcott Wind Farm Ltd, Cold Northcott, Launceston, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y Y 6.8 6.8 6.8 0.0 47.00 50.50 Changes completed. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz Connon Bridge Energy Ltd, Landfill Site, East Taphouse, Liskeard, Cornwall 0.5s).Abdul Sattar confirmed complete by email 19/11/10.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational-Condition-Independent Criteria Dedicated to Monitoring Wind Turbine Generators
    Operational-Condition-Independent Criteria Dedicated to Monitoring Wind Turbine Generators Wenxian Yang1, Shuangwen Sheng2, and Richard Court3 1School of Marine Science and Technology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK [email protected] 2National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, USA [email protected] 3National Renewable Energy Center, Blyth, Northumberland, NE24 1LZ, UK [email protected] ABSTRACT 876 megawatts (MW). The 90-MW Teesside wind farm has been recently consented. Following Round 1, the Condition monitoring is beneficial to the wind industry for government launched a plan for a second round of larger both land-based and offshore plants. However, because of sites in 2003. In Round 2, 16 sites were awarded, totaling a the variations in operational conditions, its potential has not combined capacity of up to 7.2 GW. Today, two Round 2 been fully explored. There is a need to develop an offshore wind farms (Gunfleet Sands II 64 MW and Thanet operational-condition-independent condition monitoring 300 MW) are fully operational, five are under construction, technique, which has motivated the research presented here. three were consented, and the other six are in planning. In this paper, three operational-condition-independent Subsequently, the UK offshore wind Round 3 scheme was criteria are developed. The criteria accomplish the condition announced in 2008, offering nine development zones and a monitoring by analyzing the wind turbine electrical signals total electric-generating capacity of 32 GW—equaling one- in the time domain. Therefore, they are simple to calculate fourth of the UK’s electricity needs. From these data, it can and ideal for online use.
    [Show full text]
  • European Real Estate Market 2016
    April 2017 Contents 2 The European Union European Demography Urbanization Real Estate Market Economy 2016 5 European Office Market 8 European Retail Market 11 European Logistics Market Duff & Phelps 1 2016 European Real Estate Market Report - April 2017 The European Union The EU • When European countries started to The European Union cooperate economically in 1951, only Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands participated • The Union reached its current size of 28 member countries with the accession of Croatia on 1 July 2013 • On June, 23rd, the people of the UK voted to withdraw from the European Union. The UK remains an EU Member State until negotiations on the terms of exit are completed. Demography • The current demographic situation in the EU-28 is characterized by continue population growth • 2015 was the first year (since the series began in 1961) when there was a natural © European Union, 2013 Service Audiovisual – EC Source: decrease in population numbers in the EU-28 • On 1 January 2016, the population of the EU-28 was estimated at 510.1 million inhabitants, which was 1.8 million more than a year before EU 28 Population % • A total of 17 Member States observed an 520,000,000 0.5 increase in their respective populations, while the population fell in the remaining 500,000,000 0.4 11 Member States 480,000,000 0.3 460,000,000 0.2 440,000,000 0.1 420,000,000 0 400,000,000 -0.1 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Var. % Population Population (EU 28 Countries, left scale) (EU 28 Countries, right scale) Source: REAG R&D on Eurostat data Duff & Phelps 2 2016 European Real Estate Market Report - April 2017 The European Union Urbanization • Almost three quarters of the European Capital cities - Population: last 10 years variation (%) population lived in an urban area in 2015 30% • According to the United Nations (World 25% urbanization prospects 2014) in Europe the 20% share of the population living in urban areas 15% projected to rise to just over 80% by 2050 10% • Capital cities have the highest population 5% growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Horns Rev II Offshore Wind Farm Monitoring of Migrating Waterbirds Baseline Studies 2007-08
    Horns Rev II Offshore Wind Farm Monitoring of Migrating Waterbirds Baseline Studies 2007-08 Client DONG Energy A/S Teglholmen A.C. Meyers Vænge 9 DK 2450 København SV Tel: +45 4480 6000 Representative Lars Bie Jensen E-mail [email protected] Consultant Authors Orbicon A/S Werner Piper Jens Juuls Vej 18 Gerd Kulik DK 8260 Viby J Jan Durinck Tel: +45 8738 6166 Henrik Skov Simon B. Leonhard DHI Water Environment Health A/S Agern Allé 5 DK-2970 Hørsholm Tel: +45 4516 9200 In association with: BIOLA Gotenstrasse 4 D - 20097 Hamburg Tel: + 49 40 2380 8791 Project 132-07.1004 Project manager Simon B. Leonhard Marine Observers Quality assurance Simon B. Leonhard Svankjærvej 6 Revision 3 DK-7752 Snedsted Approved Lars Sloth Tel: +45 9796 2696 Published October 2008 Database: Cynthia Erb, Gerd Kulik, Werner Piper GIS: Ellen Heinsch, Jan Durinck, Observers: Werner Piper, Lutz von der Heyde, Dr. Hans-Wolfgang Nehls, Karsten Kohls, Hans Pelny, Thilo Christophersen Photos: Jan Durinck, Thomas W. Johansen, Henrik Skov, Jens Christensen CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 3 DANSK RESUME ....................................................................................................................... 5 2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Background .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Farm Wake Verification
    Copenhagen, 10 February 2015 Wind farm wake verification Support by Kurt S. Hansen Senior Scientist DTU Wind Energy – Fluid Mechanics Outline • Introduction wind turbine wakes; • Participants & models; • Results Simple wakes and moderate spacing; Wakes for small spacing and speed recovery; Wakes for variable spacing Wind farm clusters; Wake behind a large wind farm; • Discussion & acknowledgements; EERA-DTOC Final Conference, Copenhagen, 10th March 2015 2 Introduction wind turbine wakes 1. Basic wake deficit - pairs of wind turbines; a) Power deficit; b) Peak deficit vs turbulence; 2. Rows of turbines; a) Constant spacing (small or large); b) Speed recovery due to ”missing” turbines; 3. Wind farms with variable spacing; 4. Park efficiency; 5. Wind farm clusters = Farm – Farm wake EERA-DTOC Final Conference, Copenhagen, 10th March 2015 3 Wake deficit between pairs of wind turbines Definition of power deficit = 1 – power ratio = 1 – Pwake/Pfree Ambient EERA-DTOC Final Conference, Copenhagen, 10th March 2015 4 Wake deficit for turbines with constant spacing Increased sector, ∆ EERA-DTOC Final Conference, Copenhagen, 10th March 2015 5 Definition of park efficiency Park efficiency at 8 m/s & ∆=5° Definition of park efficiency ηpark : ηpark = <Pi>/Pref where Pref = undisturbed turbines <Pi>; i=3..8 otherwise: Pref = <Ptop 3> EERA-DTOC Final Conference, Copenhagen, 10th March 2015 6 Introduction to wind farms 1. Horns Rev I WF: 80 x Vestas V80 á 2MW Regular layout with 7D spacing; Well know dataset from other benchmarks; 2. Lillgrund WF: 48 x SWP-2.3-93 m Very dense wind farm with 3.3 and 4.3 D fixed spacing; Missing ”turbines” => speed recovery analysis; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure, Equipment and Systems for Offshore Wind Farms on the OCS
    Structure, Equipment and Systems for Offshore Wind Farms on the OCS Part 2 of 2 Parts - Commentary pal Author, Houston, Texas Houston, Texas pal Author, Project No. 633, Contract M09PC00015 Prepared for: Minerals Management Service Department of the Interior Dr. Malcolm Sharples, Princi This draft report has not been reviewed by the Minerals Management Service, nor has it been approved for publication. Approval, when given, does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Offshore : Risk & Technology Consulting Inc. December 2009 MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE CONTRACT Structure, Equipment and Systems for Offshore Wind on the OCS - Commentary 2 MMS Order No. M09PC00015 Structure, Equipment and Systems: Commentary Front Page Acknowledgement– Kuhn M. (2001), Dynamics and design optimisation of OWECS, Institute for Wind Energy, Delft Univ. of Technology TABLE OF CONTENTS Authors’ Note, Disclaimer and Invitation:.......................................................................... 5 1.0 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 MMS and Alternative Energy Regulation .................................................................... 10 1.1 Existing Standards and Guidance Overview..................................................... 13 1.2 Country Requirements. ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]