Radiocarbon After Four Decades RADIOCARBON R.E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Radiocarbon After Four Decades RADIOCARBON R.E Radiocarbon After Four Decades RADIOCARBON R.E. Taylor A. Long R.S. Kra Editors Radiocarbon After Four Decades An Interdisciplinary Perspective With 148 Illustrations Springer Science+Business Media, LLC R.E. Thylor Austin Long Department of Anthropology Department of Geosciences Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics The University of Arizona University of California, Riverside Thscon, AZ 85721 USA Riverside, CA 92521-0418 USA Renee S. Kra Department of Geosciences The University of Arizona Thscon, AZ 85721 USA Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Radiocarbon after four decades: an interdisciplinary perspective / [editors], R.E. Taylor, Austin Long, Renee S. Kra. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4757-4251-0 ISBN 978-1-4757-4249-7 (eBook) DOI 1O.l007/978-1-4757-4249-7 1. Radiocarbon dating. I. Taylor, R. E. (Royal Ervin), 1938- II. Long, Austin. III. Kra, Renee S. QC798.D3R3 1992 546'.6815884-dc20 91-44448 Printed on acid-free paper. © 1992 Springer Science+BusinessMedia New York Originally published by Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. in 1992 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1992 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written per­ mission of the publisher,Springer Science+Bnsiness Media, LLC, except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereaf­ ter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc., in this publication, even if the former are not especially identified, is not to be taken as a sign that such names, as understood by the Trade Marks and Merchandise Marks Act, may accordingly be used freely by anyone. Production managed by Ellen Seham; manufacturing supervised by Robert Paella. Camera-ready copy provided by the editors. 987654321 ISBN 978-1-4757-4251-0 FOREWORD Four decades have passed since the beginning of the use of radiocarbon as a dating, biological and environmental tracer isotope. More than thirty years ago, in December 1960, the Nobel Prize for Chemistry was bestowed on Willard Frank Libby (1909-1980) for the development of the radiocarbon C4C) method. One of the scientists who proposed Libby for the Nobel laureate characterized the significance of the 14C method in these words: "Seldom has a single discovery in chemistry had such an impact on the thinking of so many fields of human endeavor. Seldom has a single discovery generated such wide public interest" (Nobel Foundation 1964). On 4-8 June 1990, a conference at the University of California Lake Arrowhead Conference Center marked the major contributions that 14C has made to research in archaeology, biochemistry, environmental studies, geochemistry, geology, geophysics, hydrology and oceanography over the last forty years. Originally, plans for this conference had been discussed 15 years ago, following Libby's retirement in 1976 from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). The proposed seminar was envisioned as a vehicle around which a Festschrift volume would have been developed. Libby's death in 1980, at the age of 71, terminated these plans. The concept of the Lake Arrowhead Conference arose from discussions among R E Taylor (University of California, Riverside), James Arnold (U ni versi ty of California, San Diego) and Ernest Anderson (retired from the University of California/Los Alamos National Laboratory). During 1948 to 1949 at the University of Chicago, James R Arnold - as a postdoctoral fellow - and Ernest C Anderson - as Libby's first graduate student at Chicago - carried out the critical experiments that established the essential validity of the 14C method. The involvement of R E Taylor resulted from the opportunity Willard Libby gave to a graduate student in archaeology/anthro­ pology at UCLA to serve as a research assistant in Libby's Isotope Laboratory during the 1970s. In 1987, an International Advisory Committee was formed to provide counsel and direction in the organization of the conference. The members of this v vi Foreword committee were Ernest C Anderson, James R Arnold, Paul E Damon, Gordon J Fergusson, Frederick Johnson, Kunihiko Kigoshi, Willem G Mook, Hans Oeschger, Ingrid U Olsson, Henry A Polach, Meyer Rubin, Hans E Suess, Minze Stuiver, Henrik Tauber and John C Vogel. A Local Organizing Commit­ tee, consisting of Rainer Berger (UCLA), Jonathon E Ericson (University of California, Irvine) and R E Taylor, as Chair, was responsible for conference arrangements. The moderators for the six conference sessions were Paul E Damon (The University of Arizona) and Minze Stuiver (University of Washington) for the Natural Carbon Cycle; Henry A Polach (Australian National University) for Instrumentation and Sample Preparation; Willem G Mook (University of Groningen) for Hydrology; Fred Wendorf (Southern Methodist University) for Old World Archaeology and Paleoanthropology; Rainer Berger and R E Taylor for New World Archaeology; Meyer Rubin (United States Geological Survey) for Earth Sciences; and Lloyd A Currie (National Institute of Standards and Technology) for Environmental Sciences. Historical and New Approaches Theme Lectures, held in the evenings, inspired the participants with anecdotal reminiscences and great expectations for future trends. The moderators all did excellent jobs of organizing their sessions, inviting scientists who are experts in their respective fields. "New faces" blended with the "old guard" of the international radiocarbon community, as feelings of pride, admiration and accomplishment permeated the beautiful summer setting of Lake Arrowhead. This volume, a culmination of the discussions and presentations at Lake Arrowhead, is a unique tribute to the achievements of radiocarbon dating over the last forty years. Few 20th century scientific discoveries have had such a profound interdisciplinary impact. The chapters represent overviews of the history, development and future trends in the field, documenting the far-reaching influence that radiocarbon has had on a wide spectrum of scientific disciplines - including archaeology, astrophysics, biology, chemistry, dendrochronology, environmental sciences, geosciences, hydrology, oceanography, palynology and physics. For the first time, specialists have gathered to assess comprehensively the broad nature and consequences of the introduction of radiocarbon into the carbon cycle. R E Taylor, Austin Long and Renee S Kra REFERENCE Nobel Foundation 1964 Nobel Lectures, Chemistry 1942-1962. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 587-588. Acknowledgments The conference organizers are indebted, for generous financial support of the conference, to the Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (CAMS), University of California/Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (UC/LLNL), as well as to the Willard F Libby Foundation, the Systemwide University of California Administration, Systemwide Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (lGPP), UCLA Branch of the IGPP, University of California, Riverside (UCR) campus administration, University of California, Irvine (UCI) campus administration, UCLA campus administration, the UCLA Department of Chemistry and the Society for Archaeological Sciences. We particularly wish to thank Jay C Davis (CAMS) and Orson L Anderson (Systemwide IGPP) for their support and encouragement, and acknowledge the helpful suggestions of Minze Stuiver and other members of the International Advisory Committee for the design of the conference logo. We wish to express our sincere appreciation to Donna Kirner for her efficient management of the Lake Arrowhead Conference, as well as the very helpful assistance of Jeffrey Lehman, Louis Pay en, Joye Sage and Anna Weaver. The editors most gratefully acknowledge Harry E Gove and Donald 0 Henry, who did not attend the conference, but nonetheless, contributed significant chap­ ters to this volume. Assistant Editor of RADIOCARBON, Frances D Moskovitz, played a key role in the physical production of this book, and we sincerely thank her for it. For their invaluable help in shaping the final content of this volume, we wholeheartedly acknowledge the work of the reviewers of the original manuscripts: Brian Atwater Mebus A Geyh Jim Phillips Bryant Bannister Herbert Haas L Neil Plummer Mike F Barbetti P Edgar Hare Henry A Polach Edouard Bard Calvin J Heusser George C Reid Edward Boyle Frank Hole Don S Rice Wallace S Broecker Gordon Jacobi Fred N Robertson Michael D Coe Jack R Jokipii Meyer Rubin Tyler B Coplen A J T Jull Garth Sampson Lloyd A Currie Mark J Kenoyer Jim G Shaffer Paul E Damon George A Klouda Michael B Schiffer George A Dawson J L Lanzerotti Kerry Sieh Owen K Davis John H Law Charles P Sonett James M Devine David C Lowe Thomas W Stafford, Jr Robert Earl Dickinson Richard H Meadow Jerry J Stipp Douglas J Donahue Clement W Meighan Michael Thurman David Elmore Willem G Mook Pierre M Vermeersch George W Farwell Andrew Moore John S Vogel Gordon J Fergusson John E Noakes Martin Wahlen Joan Feynman Tsung-Hung Peng Al Yang George Frison Fred M Phillips ungli~ Svenska Vetellskaps­ ak3demien har vid sin Sa1l11nan­ komst den J novenlber 1960 i enlig-­ hermed.foreskrffterna i det" all ALFRED NOBEL den 27 nOl'enlber1895 upprattatU te5i~mentet beslutat art ol-'erlamna. tkt pris som dena ar borrgil'(s.f6r den l'ikti{!"asre kemiska upptJck~ eller.f6rltittrin~ nIt WILLARD F. LIBBY
Recommended publications
  • Radiocarbon Dates from Volcanic Deposits at Mount St. Helens, Washington
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Radiocarbon Dates from Volcanic Deposits at Mount St. Helens, Washington By Dwight R. Crandell, Donal R. Mullineaux, Meyer Rubin, Elliott Spiker, and M. L. Kelley Open-File Report 81-844 1981 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey standards or nomenclature. Radiocarbon dates from volcanic deposits at Mount St. Helens, Washington by Dwight R. Crandell, Donal R. Mullineaux, Meyer Rubin, Elliott Spiker, and M. L. Kelley Stratigraphic studies of the eruptive products of Mount St. Helens volcano, supported by radiocarbon dates, were begun in the late 1950's (Crandell and others, 1962; Mullineaux and Crandell, 1962). More detailed studies were begun by Jack H. Hyde in 1968 (Hyde, 1970, 1973, 1975) and were expanded by Crandell and Mullineaux between 1970 and the present. Age determinations in the radiocarbon laboratory of the U.S. Geological Survey in Reston, Va., on organic matter incorporated in the volcanic products, permitted the volcano's eruptive events to be arranged chronologically (table 1). These radiocarbon dates have contributed immeasurably to an understanding of the volcano's history and potential hazards (Crandell and Mullineaux, 1978), and through long-range tephrochronology have also aided in the solution of other geologic problems in the Pacific Northwest such as dating the last scabland flood in eastern Washington (Mullineaux and others, 1978). Some of the 65 radiocarbon dates listed here have been published previously, but nowhere have they all been assembled in a single place. Because of widespread interest in the past history of the volcano as a result of the eruptions that began in 1980, and to make these dates readily available to future workers, we prepared this compilation of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Meyer Rubin-A Radiocarbon Pioneer
    Radiocarbon, Vol 00, Nr 00, 2021, p 1–6 DOI:10.1017/RDC.2021.65 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona MEYER RUBIN—A RADIOCARBON PIONEER G S Burr1* • Jack McGeehin2 1Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 2Radiocarbon Laboratory (retired), U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA Meyer Rubin (1924–2020). Photo courtesy of Harvey Belkin. MEYER RUBIN’S RADIOCARBON LEGACY Meyer Rubin (February 17, 1924–May 2, 2020) was a pioneer in the field of radiocarbon. In 1950, after serving in World War II, he began his career as a geologist at the United States Geological Survey (USGS). He joined the survey’s radiocarbon laboratory on December 1, 1953, under Hans Suess (Suess 1954a). Suess constructed an acetylene gas 14C beta- counting laboratory that extended the age limit of the Libby 14C solid graphite method by several half-lives (Suess 1954b; Flint and Rubin 1955). After Suess left, Meyer became the director of the USGS lab. In 1956 he completed his PhD degree from the University of Chicago (Rubin 1956) and pursued his radiocarbon research at the USGS with great industry. By the end of the 1950s Meyer had reported 14C results from 38 U.S. states, 26 countries around the world, the Atlantic Ocean, Antarctica, and the stratosphere (see references in Table 1). Meyer was also a seasoned field geologist, and during the 1950s alone, he collected samples from over a dozen states. Meyer published date lists to provide a record of his efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Texas Radiocarbon Dates I J
    [RADIocARI oN, VOL. 4, 1962, P. 43-501 UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RADIOCARBON DATES I J. J. STIPP,* E. MOTT DAVIS, JOHN E. NOAKES,* and TOM E. HOOVER Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Balcones Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, Texas The C14 Dating Laboratory of the University of Texas has been working on the development of two systems of counting : gas counting with methane, and liquid scintillation counting with benzene. Lack of adequate instrumentation has retarded the work on gas counting, but the liquid scintillation work, sup- ported in part by the Department of Chemistry, finally led to the successful development of a system in which the benzene counting solvent was synthesized from acetylene by pyrolysis (Tamers, Stipp, and Collier, 1961). By coincidence, while the work on liquid scintillation was going on at the University of Texas, Noakes was doing work at the A. & M. College of Texas on a low temperature catalytic method of benzene conversion for radiocarbon dating (Noakes, Isbell, and Hood, 1961; Anonymous, 1961) . We eventually learned of each other's work, and it became evident that collaboration would be of mutual benefit. The better points of the two systems were combined, the catalytic method being chosen for the benzene conversion. A preparation sys- tem was built at the University of Texas laboratory, and a Packard Tri-Garb Liquid Scintillation Spectrometer was made available at the A. & M. College of Texas and calibrated for low level C14 counting. The cooperative effort led to successful routine dating, and produced the dates reported here. The two laboratories are still working together, but each expects soon to have a complete system, and thereafter they will operate independently.
    [Show full text]
  • SOLAR SIGNALS from 14C in TREE RINGS and DETERMINING RECURRENCE INTERVALS of GREAT SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKES in SOUTHERN ALASK
    Abstracts 231 SOLAR SIGNALS FROM 14C IN TREE RINGS ELISABETTA PIERAZZO Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA and SILVIA SARTORI Department of Physics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy 14C The record in wines has shown many interesting features. The strongest signal which is imprinted in it comes from the 11-year solar cycle. Another possible feature could be a frequency modulation of solar origin, also detectable, despite the limited length of the record (carrier period 11 years, modulating period 22 years). The solar signature is also present in annual tree rings, though weaker; the length of the record is short, in any case. Long tree-ring records are now available in decadal and bi-decadal sequences. However, as it is well known, conventional spectral analysis of such temporal sequences, is affected by aliasing, which is always present in equispaced sequences where a signal lies beyond the Nyquist frequency. Thus, it is difficult to clearly define the real presence of solar cycles on the scale of centuries. Alaasing can be avoided in the analysis of unequispaced time sequences. On the other hand, unequispaced sequences ask for other more sophisticated treatments, such as Bayesian analysis. A comparison is carried out between the detectability of signals of solar origin in unequispaced and equispaced sequences, when the latter contain aliased frequencies. A frequency modulation model for wines is compared with an annual sequence in tree rings, for the last 400 years. DETERMINING RECURRENCE INTERVALS OF GREAT SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKES IN SOUTHERN ALASKA BY RADIOCARBON DATING GEORGE PLAFKER, K R LAJOIE U S Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025 USA and MEYER RUBIN U S Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 22092 USA Rupture on the eastern segment of the Aleutian arc subduction zone produced the great 1964 Alaska earthquake and caused vertical and horizontal tectonic displacements over more than 14C 140,000 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • Anniversary of Radiocarbon Laboratory
    Anniversary of Radiocarbon Laboratory September 19, 1967 The father of the "atomic time clock" will keynote the observance on September 22 of the 10th anniversary of the establishment of the La Jolla Radiocarbon Laboratory of the University of California, San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography. He is Dr. Willard Frank Libby, professor of chemistry at UCLA and 1960 recipient of the Nobel Prize for chemistry for his discovery of a method to determine geological age by measuring the amount of radioactive carbon-14 in organic or carbon containing objects. The observance is a tribute by his colleagues to Dr. Hans E. Suess, UCSD professor of geochemistry, who set up the Scripps Radiocarbon Laboratory in August, 1957. It will be held in Scripps' Sumner Auditorium. The day's agenda includes a welcome by Dr. Frederick T. Wall, UCSD vice chancellor for graduate studies and research; Dr. Libby's address and Dr. Suess' response; an informal luncheon; presentation of scientific papers; and a dinner. Scientists from the UCLA Radiocarbon Laboratory, which Dr. Libby directs; and from similar laboratories at the University of Arizona, Tucson; University of Washington, Seattle; and Washington State University, Pullman, have been invited to attend. Dr. James R. Arnold, UCSD professor of chemistry, is arranging the day-long affair. Although Dr. Suess heads up the Scripps Radiocarbon Laboratory, its day-to-day operations are supervised by Dr. George S. Bien, specialist in UCSD's Department of Chemistry. Dr. Libby, who is director of the University's statewide Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, majored in chemistry at the University of California, Berkeley, and received his doctorate there in 1933.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science
    Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2018 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science Many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for nuclear research and instrumentation. The field has spun off: particle physics, nuclear astrophysics, nuclear power reactors, nuclear medicine, and nuclear weapons. Understanding how the nucleus works and applying that knowledge to technology has been one of the most significant accomplishments of twentieth century scientific research. Each prize was awarded for physics unless otherwise noted. Name(s) Discovery Year Henri Becquerel, Pierre Discovered spontaneous radioactivity 1903 Curie, and Marie Curie Ernest Rutherford Work on the disintegration of the elements and 1908 chemistry of radioactive elements (chem) Marie Curie Discovery of radium and polonium 1911 (chem) Frederick Soddy Work on chemistry of radioactive substances 1921 including the origin and nature of radioactive (chem) isotopes Francis Aston Discovery of isotopes in many non-radioactive 1922 elements, also enunciated the whole-number rule of (chem) atomic masses Charles Wilson Development of the cloud chamber for detecting 1927 charged particles Harold Urey Discovery of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) 1934 (chem) Frederic Joliot and Synthesis of several new radioactive elements 1935 Irene Joliot-Curie (chem) James Chadwick Discovery of the neutron 1935 Carl David Anderson Discovery of the positron 1936 Enrico Fermi New radioactive elements produced by neutron 1938 irradiation Ernest Lawrence
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The new prophet : Harold C. Urey, scientist, atheist, and defender of religion Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3j80v92j Author Shindell, Matthew Benjamin Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The New Prophet: Harold C. Urey, Scientist, Atheist, and Defender of Religion A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History (Science Studies) by Matthew Benjamin Shindell Committee in charge: Professor Naomi Oreskes, Chair Professor Robert Edelman Professor Martha Lampland Professor Charles Thorpe Professor Robert Westman 2011 Copyright Matthew Benjamin Shindell, 2011 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Matthew Benjamin Shindell is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2011 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………...... iii Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………. iv Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Meyer Rubin-A Radiocarbon Pioneer
    Radiocarbon, Vol 00, Nr 00, 2021, p 1–6 DOI:10.1017/RDC.2021.65 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona MEYER RUBIN—A RADIOCARBON PIONEER G S Burr1* • Jack McGeehin2 1Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 2Radiocarbon Laboratory (retired), U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA Meyer Rubin (1924–2020). Photo courtesy of Harvey Belkin. MEYER RUBIN’S RADIOCARBON LEGACY Meyer Rubin (February 17, 1924–May 2, 2020) was a pioneer in the field of radiocarbon. In 1950, after serving in World War II, he began his career as a geologist at the United States Geological Survey (USGS). He joined the survey’s radiocarbon laboratory on December 1, 1953, under Hans Suess (Suess 1954a). Suess constructed an acetylene gas 14C beta- counting laboratory that extended the age limit of the Libby 14C solid graphite method by several half-lives (Suess 1954b; Flint and Rubin 1955). After Suess left, Meyer became the director of the USGS lab. In 1956 he completed his PhD degree from the University of Chicago (Rubin 1956) and pursued his radiocarbon research at the USGS with great industry. By the end of the 1950s Meyer had reported 14C results from 38 U.S. states, 26 countries around the world, the Atlantic Ocean, Antarctica, and the stratosphere (see references in Table 1). Meyer was also a seasoned field geologist, and during the 1950s alone, he collected samples from over a dozen states. Meyer published date lists to provide a record of his efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Figuring out a Date Archaeologists Cannot Always Immediately Give a Date for Some Things They Find
    Figuring Out a Date Archaeologists cannot always immediately give a date for some things they find. One way archaeologists try to figure out dates is by comparing kinds of materials used to make things. Early people used stone tools. Eventually, people discovered metal, which was better than stone, and they began using that. Archaeologists know that stone was used before metal because they find stone in deeper layers in the stratigraphy. How the ax developed: 1. The first axes were held in the hand. 2. Polished stone axes were used by the earliest farmers to clear land. 3. The first bronze axes copied the stone ones 4. Bronze axes developed to fit in wooden handles. 5. A new development used a loop to hold the ax to the handle. 6. A strong modern ax has a steel head. In the 1940s, there was a revolution in archaeology. An American chemist named Willard Libby discovered a new method for dating objects from the distant past, called radiocarbon, or carbon-14 dating. It is based on the scientific principle that all living things contain a certain amount of radioactive carbon. Once a living thing dies, carbon begins to decay. Scientists know that half of the carbon decays in 5,730 years. Measuring how much radioactive carbon is present in a sample gives a date. This kind of dating can be used for rocks, pottery, and glass. Charcoal is always a good sample for radiocarbon dating. 'r'*~neuti6ts. nitrogen and fonn 'Th~'heutrons . radioactive carbon ;interact with (C14). ",-.' ... Plants take in this ... In living plants ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Links of Chain of Development of Physics from Past to the Present in a Chronological Order Starting from Thales of Miletus
    ISSN (Online) 2393-8021 IARJSET ISSN (Print) 2394-1588 International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 5, Issue 10, October 2018 The Links of Chain of Development of Physics from Past to the Present in a Chronological Order Starting from Thales of Miletus Dr.(Prof.) V.C.A NAIR* Educational Physicist, Research Guide for Physics at Shri J.J.T. University, Rajasthan-333001, India. *[email protected] Abstract: The Research Paper consists mainly of the birth dates of scientists and philosophers Before Christ (BC) and After Death (AD) starting from Thales of Miletus with a brief description of their work and contribution to the development of Physics. The author has taken up some 400 odd scientists and put them in a chronological order. Nobel laureates are considered separately in the same paper. Along with the names of researchers are included few of the scientific events of importance. The entire chain forms a cascade and a ready reference for the reader. The graph at the end shows the recession in the earlier centuries and its transition to renaissance after the 12th century to the present. Keywords: As the contents of the paper mainly consists of names of scientists, the key words are many and hence the same is not given I. INTRODUCTION As the material for the topic is not readily available, it is taken from various sources and the collection and compiling is a Herculean task running into some 20 pages. It is given in 3 parts, Part I, Part II and Part III. In Part I the years are given in Chronological order as per the year of birth of the scientist and accordingly the serial number.
    [Show full text]
  • 38,000 Fresh-Water Mussel Shells from S Side of Road Cut on State Highway 113, Approx
    U. S. Geological Survey Radiocarbon Dates VII Item Type Article; text Authors Ives, Patricia C.; Levin, Betsy; Robinson, Richard D.; Rubin, Meyer Citation Ives, P. C., Levin, B., Robinson, R. D., & Rubin, M. (1964). U. S. Geological Survey radiocarbon dates VII. Radiocarbon, 6, 37-76. DOI 10.1017/S0033822200010547 Publisher American Journal of Science Journal Radiocarbon Rights Copyright © The American Journal of Science Download date 02/10/2021 21:25:40 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/654046 I:RADIOCARUON, Vol.. 6, 1964, P. 37-761 U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RADIOCARBON DATES VII* PATRICIA C. IVES, BETSY LEVIN, RICHARD D. ROBINSON, and MEYER RUBIN U. S. Geological Survey, Washington, D. C. This date list contains the results of measurements made during 1961, 1962 and 1963. The method of counting, utilizing acetylene gas, remains essen- tially unchanged, except for the addition of some solid state electronics. The method of computation, using the Libby half-life of 5568 ± 30 yr, is con- tinued. The error listed is always larger than the one-sigma statistical counting error commonly used, and takes into account known uncertainty laboratory factors, and does not include external (field or atmospheric) variations. Unless otherwise stated, collectors of all samples are members of the U. S. Geological Survey. SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS A. Eastern U. S. W-1132. Copperas Gap, Arkansas >38,000 Fresh-water mussel shells from S side of road cut on State Highway 113, approx. 1 mi SW of Arkansas River, SE'/4 NE'/4 SE'/4 sec.
    [Show full text]
  • 08 Golf-Men Guide-Bleeds.Pmd
    26 27 he San Francisco Bay Area is a major metropoli- tan area of approximately six million people and Tone of the most scenic regions in the United States. The Bay Area includes the major cities of San Francisco and Oakland, as well as Berkeley, home of the world- renowned University of California. Just south is the city of San Jose and the Silicon Valley, home to many of the world’s high-tech companies. The Bay Area also lies within easy driving distance of the high Sierra resorts of Lake Tahoe and Yosemite, the Monterey/Carmel penin- sula, the world famous Napa wine country, and the spec- tacular Mendocino Coast. Everyone knows “The City” - San Francisco - from count- less photographs, movies and television shows that cap- ture its magic. It is a city built on a series of more than 40 hills, offering panoramic views of every kind. The hub of a nine-county complex and the financial and insurance capi- tal of the world, San Francisco has a resident population of about 740,000. San Francisco is situated on a 46.6 square-mile peninsula bounded on the west by the Pa- cific Ocean, on the north by the Golden Gate strait, and from north to east by the San Francisco Bay. The City has been named the world’s top city twice by readers of Conde Nast Traveller and the top U.S. city seven times since 1988. The San Francisco Bay is spanned by two landmarks, the Golden Gate and San Francisco-Oakland Bay bridges, and graced by four islands: Alcatraz, Angel, Yerba Buena and Treasure.
    [Show full text]