Woltorio De La Un Camion
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Zootaxa,Phylogeny and Higher Classification of the Scale Insects
Zootaxa 1668: 413–425 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Phylogeny and higher classification of the scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)* P.J. GULLAN1 AND L.G. COOK2 1Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected] *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . .413 Introduction . .413 A review of archaeococcoid classification and relationships . 416 A review of neococcoid classification and relationships . .420 Future directions . .421 Acknowledgements . .422 References . .422 Abstract The superfamily Coccoidea contains nearly 8000 species of plant-feeding hemipterans comprising up to 32 families divided traditionally into two informal groups, the archaeococcoids and the neococcoids. The neococcoids form a mono- phyletic group supported by both morphological and genetic data. In contrast, the monophyly of the archaeococcoids is uncertain and the higher level ranks within it have been controversial, particularly since the late Professor Jan Koteja introduced his multi-family classification for scale insects in 1974. Recent phylogenetic studies using molecular and morphological data support the recognition of up to 15 extant families of archaeococcoids, including 11 families for the former Margarodidae sensu lato, vindicating Koteja’s views. Archaeococcoids are represented better in the fossil record than neococcoids, and have an adequate record through the Tertiary and Cretaceous but almost no putative coccoid fos- sils are known from earlier. -
GIS Handbook Appendices
Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation -
A New Pupillarial Scale Insect (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Eriococcidae) from Angophora in Coastal New South Wales, Australia
Zootaxa 4117 (1): 085–100 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4117.1.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5C240849-6842-44B0-AD9F-DFB25038B675 A new pupillarial scale insect (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Eriococcidae) from Angophora in coastal New South Wales, Australia PENNY J. GULLAN1,3 & DOUGLAS J. WILLIAMS2 1Division of Evolution, Ecology & Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia 2The Natural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences (Entomology), London SW7 5BD, UK 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new scale insect, Aolacoccus angophorae gen. nov. and sp. nov. (Eriococcidae), is described from the bark of Ango- phora (Myrtaceae) growing in the Sydney area of New South Wales, Australia. These insects do not produce honeydew, are not ant-tended and probably feed on cortical parenchyma. The adult female is pupillarial as it is retained within the cuticle of the penultimate (second) instar. The crawlers (mobile first-instar nymphs) emerge via a flap or operculum at the posterior end of the abdomen of the second-instar exuviae. The adult and second-instar females, second-instar male and first-instar nymph, as well as salient features of the apterous adult male, are described and illustrated. The adult female of this new taxon has some morphological similarities to females of the non-pupillarial palm scale Phoenicococcus marlatti Cockerell (Phoenicococcidae), the pupillarial palm scales (Halimococcidae) and some pupillarial genera of armoured scales (Diaspididae), but is related to other Australian Myrtaceae-feeding eriococcids. -
First Record of Phoenicococcus Marlatti in Greece
ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA Vol. 22, 2013 First record of Phoenicococcus marlatti in Greece Lytra I. Laboratory of Agricultural Entomology and Zoology, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece Vasarmidaki M. Municipality of Heraklion, 1 A. Titou, 71202 Heraklion, Greece Papadoulis G. Laboratory of Agricultural Entomology and Zoology, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece https://doi.org/10.12681/eh.11528 Copyright © 2017 I. Ch. Lytra, M. E. Vasarmidaki, G. Th. Papadoulis To cite this article: Lytra, I., Vasarmidaki, M., & Papadoulis, G. (2013). First record of Phoenicococcus marlatti in Greece. ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA, 22(2), 43-46. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/eh.11528 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 28/02/2020 08:10:35 | 43 ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA 22 (2013): 43-46 SHORT COMMUNICATION First record of Phoenicococcus marlatti in Greece I. CH. LYTRA1*, M. E. VASARMIDAKI2 AND G. TH. PAPADOULIS1 1Laboratory of Agricultural Entomology and Zoology, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece 2Municipality of Heraklion, 1 A. Titou, 71202 Heraklion, Greece ABSTRACT In October 2013, the red date scale Phoenicococcus marlatti Cockerell (Hemiptera: Phoenicococcidae) has been recorded for the first time in Greece. Adult females were collected from the base of fronds of date palm from the Crete Island. Information on the species morphology, biology and distribution is presented. KEY WORDS: first record, Phoenicococcus, red date scale. Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) is and South America (Miller et al. 2007). It is found in Mediterranean countries, Africa, probably found wherever date palm is part of Asia, North America and Australia. -
Coccidology. the Study of Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria (E-Journal) Revista Corpoica – Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria (2008) 9(2), 55-61 RevIEW ARTICLE Coccidology. The study of scale insects (Hemiptera: Takumasa Kondo1, Penny J. Gullan2, Douglas J. Williams3 Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea) Coccidología. El estudio de insectos ABSTRACT escama (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: A brief introduction to the science of coccidology, and a synopsis of the history, Coccoidea) advances and challenges in this field of study are discussed. The changes in coccidology since the publication of the Systema Naturae by Carolus Linnaeus 250 years ago are RESUMEN Se presenta una breve introducción a la briefly reviewed. The economic importance, the phylogenetic relationships and the ciencia de la coccidología y se discute una application of DNA barcoding to scale insect identification are also considered in the sinopsis de la historia, avances y desafíos de discussion section. este campo de estudio. Se hace una breve revisión de los cambios de la coccidología Keywords: Scale, insects, coccidae, DNA, history. desde la publicación de Systema Naturae por Carolus Linnaeus hace 250 años. También se discuten la importancia económica, las INTRODUCTION Sternorrhyncha (Gullan & Martin, 2003). relaciones filogenéticas y la aplicación de These insects are usually less than 5 mm códigos de barras del ADN en la identificación occidology is the branch of in length. Their taxonomy is based mainly de insectos escama. C entomology that deals with the study of on the microscopic cuticular features of hemipterous insects of the superfamily Palabras clave: insectos, escama, coccidae, the adult female. -
A NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY of MIFFLIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA June 2007
A NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY OF MIFFLIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA June 2007 Prepared by: Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 208 Airport Drive Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 Submitted to: Mifflin County Planning Commission 20 North Wayne Street Lewistown, PA 17044 This project was funded in part by a state grant from the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Wild Resource Conservation Program. Additional support was provided by the Department of Community & Economic Development. Additional funding was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through State Wildlife Grants program grant T-2, administered through the Pennsylvania Game Commission and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission. ii A Natural Heritage Inventory of Mifflin County, Pennsylvania 2007 Prepared by: Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program (PNHP) Western Pennsylvania Conservancy (WPC) 208 Airport Drive Middletown, PA 17057 Donna Bowers, Administration Lucy Boyce, Seasonal Field Ecologist Anthony F. Davis, Senior Ecologist Jeremy Deeds, Aquatic Zoology Coordinator Alice Doolittle, Conservation Assistant Charlie Eichelberger, Herpetologist Kathy Derge Gipe, Herpetologist William (Rocky) Gleason, County Inventory Coordinator Jim Hart, Mammalogist Rita Hawrot, Terrestrial Zoology Coordinator Denise Johnson, Assistant County Inventory Ecologist Susan Klugman, Conservation Information Manager John Kunsman, Senior Botanist Betsy Ray Leppo, Invertebrate Zoologist Trina Morris, County Inventory Ecologist Betsy Nightingale, Aquatic -
Nomina Insecta Nearctica Table of Contents
5 NOMINA INSECTA NEARCTICA TABLE OF CONTENTS Generic Index: Dermaptera -------------------------------- 73 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Species Index: Dermaptera --------------------------------- 74 Structure of the Check List --------------------------------- 11 Diplura ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 77 Original Orthography ---------------------------------------- 13 Classification: Diplura --------------------------------------- 79 Species and Genus Group Name Indices ----------------- 13 Alternative Family Names: Diplura ----------------------- 80 Structure of the database ------------------------------------ 14 Statistics: Diplura -------------------------------------------- 80 Ending Date of the List -------------------------------------- 14 Anajapygidae ------------------------------------------------- 80 Methodology and Quality Control ------------------------ 14 Campodeidae -------------------------------------------------- 80 Classification of the Insecta -------------------------------- 16 Japygidae ------------------------------------------------------ 81 Anoplura -------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 Parajapygidae ------------------------------------------------- 81 Classification: Anoplura ------------------------------------ 21 Procampodeidae ---------------------------------------------- 82 Alternative Family Names: Anoplura --------------------- 22 Generic Index: Diplura -------------------------------------- -
Hemileuca Lucina Henry Edwards, H. Nevadensis Stretch, Anisota Senatoria 0
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 38(1). 1984. 51-56 TWO INTERESTING ARTIFICIAL HYBRID CROSSES IN THE GENERA HEMILEUCA AND ANISOTA (SATURNIIDAE) RICHARD STEVEN PEIGLER1 303 Shannon Drive, Greenville, South Carolina 29615 AND BENJAMIN D. WILLIAMS The Lawrence Academy, Groton, Massachusetts 01450 ABSTRACT. Two crosses were reared to the adult stage with saturniid moths from different areas of the United States. These were Hemileuca lucina 5 x H. nevadensis Q reared in Massachusetts and Texas on Salix, and Anisata senataria 5 x A. aslari Q reared in Connecticut on Quercus caccinea. Larvae and adults of both crosses were interme diate. Descriptions and figures of the hybrids are given. Several isolating mechanisms between the parent species were tested and are discussed. Dozens of artificial crosses in the Saturniidae have been successfully reared since the previous century, but virtually all of these have in volved species of the subfamily Saturniinae. This paper deals with two remarkable crosses obtained by the junior author utilizing small satur niid moths belonging to the subfamilies Hemileucinae and Ceratocam pinae.2 In both crosses, species native to the Southwest were reared in the Northeast and females from those rearings attracted congeneric diurnal males native to the Northeast. The species involved were Hemileuca lucina Henry Edwards, H. nevadensis Stretch, Anisota senatoria 0. E. Smith) and A. oslari W. Rothschild. For information on the adult morphology, wing pattern, immature stages, hostplants, reproductive behavior, and geographical distributions of these four parent species, the reader is referred to works by Ferguson (1971) and Riotte and Peigler (1981). Hemileuca lucina <3 x H. -
Taxa Names List 6-30-21
Insects and Related Organisms Sorted by Taxa Updated 6/30/21 Order Family Scientific Name Common Name A ACARI Acaridae Acarus siro Linnaeus grain mite ACARI Acaridae Aleuroglyphus ovatus (Troupeau) brownlegged grain mite ACARI Acaridae Rhizoglyphus echinopus (Fumouze & Robin) bulb mite ACARI Acaridae Suidasia nesbitti Hughes scaly grain mite ACARI Acaridae Tyrolichus casei Oudemans cheese mite ACARI Acaridae Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) mold mite ACARI Analgidae Megninia cubitalis (Mégnin) Feather mite ACARI Argasidae Argas persicus (Oken) Fowl tick ACARI Argasidae Ornithodoros turicata (Dugès) relapsing Fever tick ACARI Argasidae Otobius megnini (Dugès) ear tick ACARI Carpoglyphidae Carpoglyphus lactis (Linnaeus) driedfruit mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex bovis Stiles cattle Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex brevis Bulanova lesser Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex canis Leydig dog Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex caprae Railliet goat Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex cati Mégnin cat Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex equi Railliet horse Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex folliculorum (Simon) Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex ovis Railliet sheep Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex phylloides Csokor hog Follicle mite ACARI Dermanyssidae Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer) chicken mite ACARI Eriophyidae Abacarus hystrix (Nalepa) grain rust mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus essigi (Hassan) redberry mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus gossypii (Banks) cotton blister mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus vaccinii -
Article 10362 8843052E4d07db
41 ﮔﻴﺎه ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ( ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﺸﺎورزي) ، ﺟﻠﺪ 36 ﺷﻤﺎره 2 ، ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎن 92 92 ﺷﭙﺸﻚ ﻫﺎي ﮔﻴﺎﻫﻲ( Hem.: Coccoidea ) ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎن ﺑﻬﺒﻬﺎن و ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺎت ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ آﻧﻬﺎ اﻟﻬﺎم روزدار1 ، ﺣﺴﻨﻌﻠﻲ واﺣﺪي2 * ، ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻣﺼﺪق3 و ﻣﺤﻤﺪ اﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﻤﻴﻊ4 -1 داﻧﺸﺠﻮي ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻛﺎرﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ارﺷﺪ ﮔﺮوه ﮔﻴﺎﻫﭙﺰﺷﻜﻲ، ﭘﺮدﻳﺲ ﻛﺸﺎورزي و ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه رازي، ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸﺎه 2* - ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪه ﻣﺴﺆول : اﺳﺘﺎدﻳ ﺎر ﮔﺮوه ﮔﻴﺎﻫﭙﺰﺷﻜﻲ، ﭘﺮدﻳﺲ ﻛﺸﺎورزي و ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه رازي، ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸﺎه ( [email protected]) -3 اﺳﺘﺎد ﮔﺮوه ﮔﻴﺎﻫﭙﺰﺷﻜﻲ، داﻧﺸﻜﺪه ﻛﺸﺎورزي، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﭼﻤﺮان، اﻫﻮاز -4 داﻧﺸﻴﺎر ﮔﺮوه ﮔﻴﺎﻫﭙﺰﺷﻜﻲ، داﻧﺸﻜﺪه ﻛﺸﺎورزي، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه وﻟﻲ ﻋﺼﺮ، رﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎن ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ درﻳﺎﻓﺖ : /1/27 91 ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ ﭘﺬﻳﺮش : /24/1 92 92 ﭼﻜﻴﺪه ﺷﭙﺸﻚ ﻫﺎي ﮔﻴﺎﻫﻲ از آﻓﺎت ﻣﻬﻢ درﺧﺘﺎن ﻣﻴﻮه و ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻت زراﻋﻲ ﻫﺴ ﺘﻨﺪ؛ در ﺳﺎل ﻫﺎي -90 1389 ﻓﻮن ﺷﭙﺸﻚ ﻫﺎي ﮔﻴﺎﻫﻲ ، روي ﮔﻴﺎ ﻫﺎن ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ، در ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﻬﺒﻬﺎن و ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ ﺷﺪ . در ﻣﺠﻤﻮع 21 ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺷﭙﺸﻚ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده ﻫﺎي : ( )Eriococcidae )2( ،Coccidae )4( ، Pseudococcidae )6( ،Diaspididae 8 و )Phoenicococcidae )1 ﮔﺰارش ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮد . ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ از ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻄﻮر ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ روي ﻛﺎراﻛﺘﺮﻫﺎي ﺗﺎﻛﺴﻮﻧﻮﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ و ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﮔﺮدﻳﺪ . ﻣﻴﺰﺑﺎن ﻫﺎ و زﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎه ﻫﺎي آﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪ . ﺟﻨﺲ Paracoccus Ezzat and McConnell و ﮔﻮﻧﻪ (Acanthococcus aceris (Signoret ﺑﺮاي اوﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎر از اﻳﺮان و 9 ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮاي اوﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎر از ﺧﻮزﺳﺘﺎن (* ) ﺛﺒﺖ ﺷﺪ؛ ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪات و ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت، ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ داراي اﻫﻤﻴﺖ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ، ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺤﺚ ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺖ . ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻫﺎي ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺪه ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ زﻳﺮ اﺳﺖ : : DIASPIDIDAE: Aspidiotus nerii* (Bouche), Diaspidiotus armenicus* (Borchsenius), Lepidosaphes malicola* Borchsenius, Melanaspis inopinata* (Leonardi), Parlatoria blanchardi (Targioni-Tozzetti) P. crypta (McKenzie), P. oleae (Colvee) and Salicicola ?kermanensis Lindinger. PSEUDOCOCCIDAE: Chorizococcus sp. -
1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist. -
Quercus Rubra L. Northern Red Oak Fagaceae Beech Family Ivan L
Quercus rubra L. Northern Red Oak Fagaceae Beech family Ivan L. Sander Northern red oak (Quercus rubru), also known as These soils are derived from glacial material, common red oak, eastern red oak, mountain red oak, residual sandstones, shale, limestone, gneisses, and gray oak, is widespread in the East and grows schists, and granites. They vary from clay to loamy on a variety of soils and topography, often forming sands and some have a high content of rock frag- pure stands. Moderate to fast growing, this tree is ments. Northern red oak grows best on deep, well- one of the more important lumber species of red oak drained loam to silty, clay loam soils (24). and is an easily transplanted, popular shade tree Although northern red oak (fig. 2) is found in all with good form and dense foliage. topographic positions, it always grows best on lower and middle slopes with northerly or easterly aspects, Habitat in coves and deep ravines, and on well-drained valley floors. It grows at elevations up to 1070 m (3,500 R) Native Range in West Virginia and up to 1680 m (5,500 ft) in the southern Appalachians (24). Northern red oak (fig. 1) is the only native oak The most important factors determining site extending northeast to Nova Scotia. It grows from quality for northern red oak are depth and texture Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Is- of the A soil horizon, aspect, and slope position and land, New Brunswick, and the Gaspe Peninsula of shape. The best sites are found on lower, concave Quebec, to Ontario, in Canada; from Minnesota slopes with a northerly or easterly aspect, on soils south to eastern Nebraska and Oklahoma; east to with a thick A horizon, and a loam to silt loam tex- Arkansas, southern Alabama, Georgia, and North ture.