DOCSLIB.ORG

Delta Township Truck Route Ordinance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delta Township Truck Route Ordinance Sec. 17-46. Approved Truck Routes. No person, individual, firm, partnership, or corporation shall operate or drive a truck upon a street within the corporate limits of the Charter Township of Delta, except on the following streets: 1. Interstate 96 Pierson Hwy. Canal Rd. west to Guinea Rd. 2. Interstate 69 9. Lansing Rd. 14. Rickle Street 3. Interstate 496 10. Mt. Hope Hwy. from Lansing Rd. 15. Ena Dr. 4. M-43 west to I-96/I69 bridge 16. Lanac St. 5. Canal Rd. from Mt. Hope Hwy 11. Pierson Hwy. from Snow Rd. west 17. North Port Dr. south to Davis Hwy. to Sanders Rd. 18. Central Circle 6. Creyts Rd. from I-496 interchange 12. Millett Hwy. from Lansing Rd. to 19. Sloan Hwy. south to Lansing Rd. Sanders Rd.; and from Creyts Rd. 20. Westland Way 7. Sanders Rd. from Pierson Hwy. west to Nixon Rd. 21. Empire Way south to Millett Hwy. 13. Davis Hwy. from Lansing Rd. west 8. Snow Rd. from Mt. Hope south to to CN Railroad Tracks; and from (Ord. No. 01-02, & 1, 5-7-01) Sec. 17-47. Definitions. [For purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings hereinafter defined:] Local Truck Traffic shall mean trucks operated to transport products, good, commodities, or raw materials either from within Delta Charter Township to another place within or outside the Township, or from outside the Township to a place within the Township. Incidental or emergency local truck traffic, as defined in Section 17-48 shall be permitted. Truck shall mean any commercial motor vehicle, common carrier, delivery truck, dump truck, double bottom truck, pole trailer, semi-trailer, tank vehicle, truck tractor, wrecker, or any other vehicle designed, used or maintained primarily for the transportation of property including, but not limited to raw materials, products, commodities or other commercial items. (Ord. No. 01-02, & 2, 5-7-01) Sec. 17-48. Incidental or Emergency Local Truck Traffic. No provision of this Ordinance shall restrict the emergency use of nor the casual or incidental commercial truck pickup or delivery to any individual, residence or business upon the streets within the corporate limits of the Charter Township of Delta. Use of “Approved Truck Routes” for such casual or incidental pick up or delivery is mandatory only if such delivery or pickup can be made without operation on streets other than said established truck routes. All trucks within the Township shall return to the nearest “Approved Truck Route” by the most direct route when finished delivering or picking up goods on non-designated routes. This includes trucks having additional destinations within the Township. Short cuts on non-truck routes are expressly prohibited. (Ord. No. 01-02, & 3, 5-7-01) Sec. 17-49. Parking. No person, individual, firm, partnership, or corporation shall park a truck as hereinabove defined, upon private property or upon public streets within the corporate limits of the Charter Township of Delta; except that trucks, as hereinabove described, shall be allowed to be parked upon private property which is zoned commercial or industrial so long as access to said property is entirely on designated truck routes and so long as the trucks do not physically or visually block or interfere with entry to or exit from public or private streets, roadways, alleys, and driveways. (Ord. No. 01-02, & 4, 5-7-01) Sec. 17-50. Signs. The Road Commissioner of the Eaton County Road Commission shall erect signs at all entrances to the Charter Township of Delta giving notice of the restrictions on truck traffic and shall erect signs on the appropriate streets, designating them as truck routes. (Ord. No. 01-02, & 5, 5-7-01) Sec. 17-51 Violations. Violation of this ordinance is a civil infraction which shall be punished by a fine for the first offense not to exceed One Hundred Dollars ($100), plus other costs, damages, or sanctions which the court in its discretion may impose. 1. Increased civil fines may be imposed for repeat violations by a person of any requirement or provision of this Ordinance. As used in this section, repeat offenses means a second (or any subsequent) municipal civil infraction violation of the same requirement or provision (i) committed by a person within any one year period (unless some other period is specifically provided by this Ordinance) and (ii) for which the person admits responsibility or is determined to be responsible. Unless otherwise specifically provided by this Ordinance for a particular municipal civil infraction violation, the increased fine for a repeat offense shall be as follows: a. The fine for any offense, which is a first, repeat offense, shall be no less than $250.00, plus costs. b. The fine for any offense, which is a second, repeat offense or any subsequent repeat offense shall be no less than $500.00, plus costs per offense. 2. Failure to answer a citation or notice to appear in court for a municipal civil infraction is a misdemeanor violation punishable by a fine of not more than $500.00, plus other costs, or by imprisonment for term not to exceed 90 days, or both fine and imprisonment. 3. Failure to comply with an order, judgment, or default in payment of a civil fine, costs, damage, or expenses so ordered may result in enforcement actions, including but not limited to imprisonment, collections, placement of liens or other remedies as permitted in Chapter 87 of Act 236 of Public Acts of 1961 as amended. 4. A municipal civil infraction is not lesser included offense of a criminal offense or an ordinance violation that is not a civil infraction. 5. Impounding of Motor Vehicles: Motor vehicles which have failed to answer six (6) or more parking violation notices or citations under this Ordinance may be immobilized or impounded by the Township. 6. Continuing Offenses: Each day on which a violation of the ordinance continues, constitutes a separate or repeat offense and shall be subject to penalties or sanctions as a separate or repeat offense. (Ord. No. 01-02, & 6, 5-7-01) Sec. 17-52. Enforcement Actions. This article shall be enforced by the person or persons designated by the Charter Township of Delta Board of Trustees. A municipal civil infraction action may be commenced upon the issuance of a municipal civil infractions citation directing the alleged violator to appear in court. (Ord. No. 01-02, & 7, 5-7-01) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid to the Historymakers ® Video Oral History with Cullen L
    Finding Aid to The HistoryMakers ® Video Oral History with Cullen L. Dubose Overview of the Collection Repository: The HistoryMakers®1900 S. Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60616 [email protected] www.thehistorymakers.com Creator: Dubose, Cullen L., 1935- Title: The HistoryMakers® Video Oral History Interview with Cullen L. Dubose, Dates: June 10, 2010 Bulk Dates: 2010 Physical 7 uncompressed MOV digital video files (3:26:24). Description: Abstract: Construction executive Cullen L. Dubose (1935 - ) was the chief operating officer for Painia Development Corporation from 1977 to 2008, and was appointed to the Michigan Economic Growth Authority in 2003 by Governor Jennifer Granholm. Dubose was interviewed by The HistoryMakers® on June 10, 2010, in Detroit, Michigan. This collection is comprised of the original video footage of the interview. Identification: A2010_046 Language: The interview and records are in English. Biographical Note by The HistoryMakers® Construction Executive Cullen L. Dubose was born on July 5, 1935 in Moss Point, Mississippi. Dubose attended Tougaloo College in Jackson, Mississippi and received his B.S. in Civil Engineering from Tri-State University in Angola, Indiana in 1958. Dubose also attended graduate school in housing and finance at Michigan State University. From 1958 to 1969, Dubose worked as a Bridge Design Engineer, Civil Engineer, Structural Draftsman, and Highway Draftsman for the Michigan Department of Structural Draftsman, and Highway Draftsman for the Michigan Department of State Highways and Transportation in Lansing, Michigan. During much of that time, Dubose also worked as a Civil Engineer for the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. From 1977 to 2008, Dubose was the Chief Operating Officer for Painia Development Corporation, a minority-owned company that provides comprehensive site selection advice and evaluates sites along with design builds for corporations looking to locate or relocate their facilities such as distribution centers, call and data centers, warehouses and manufacturing facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Location Plan (Pdf)
    . INVENSITY - Office Detroit Location Plan Arrival by Car Coming from I-94 ■ Head southwest on I-94 W (351 ft) ■ Use the left lane to take exit 215A to merge onto M-10 S toward Downtown (1.7 miles) ■ Take exit 2A toward Flint (0.6 miles) ■ Use the right lane to merge onto I-75 N (0.6 miles) ■ Use the right lane to take exit 51C for Interstate 75 N/Interstate 375 S toward Flint/Downtown (0.2 miles) ■ Keep right at the fork to stay on Exit 51C, follow signs for I-375 S/Down Town and merge onto I-375 S (0.3 miles) ■ Take the exit toward Lafayette Ave (0.1 miles) ■ Turn right onto Macomb St Destination will be on the left (0.2 miles) Coming from I-96 ■ Head northeast on W Grand River Ave/Woodside St toward W Interstate 96 Service Rd/Jeffries Fwy (118 ft) ■ Use the left lane to turn left onto W Interstate 96 Service Rd/Jeffries Fwy (312 ft) ■ Turn left at the 1st cross street onto Livernois Ave (351 ft) ■ Turn left at the 1st cross street onto Jeffries Fwy/Woodside St (236 ft) ■ Use the left lane to take the ramp onto I-96 E (0.2 miles) ■ Merge onto I-96 E (3.2 miles) ■ Use the left 2 lanes to merge onto I-75 N toward Flint (2.3 miles) ■ Use the right lane to take exit 51C for Interstate 75 N/Interstate 375 S towards talent by made innovation Flint/Downtown (0.2 miles) ■ Keep right at the fork to stay on Exit 51C, follow sign for I-375 S/Down Town and merge onto I-375 S (0.3 miles) ■ Take the exit toward Lafayette Ave (0.1 miles) ■ Turn right onto Macomb St (0.2 miles) Coming from I-75 ■ Head northwest on I-75 N (7.1 miles) ■ Take exit 202 for M-33 toward Alger/Rose City/Interstate 75 (0.4 miles) ■ Turn left onto M-33 S/W Alger Rd (0.3 miles) ■ Turn left onto the Interstate 75 S ramp to Saginaw (0.4 miles) ■ Merge onto I-75 S (87.3 miles) ■ Keep left at the fork to stay on I-75 S (63 miles) ■ Continue onto I-375 S (0.5 miles) ■ Take the exit toward Lafayette Ave (0.1 miles) ■ Turn right onto Macomb St (0.2 miles) INVENSITY Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Complete Listing of Dementia Services in the West Michigan Area
    GVSU School of Public, Nonprofit and Health Administration 401 W Fulton Street, Room 288C Grand Rapids, MI, 49504 (616) 331-6165 [email protected] In-home Medical Care In-Home Medical Care Holland Hospital Home Health Services (616) 394-3346 https://www.hollandhospital.org/hh/home-health-services.aspx We offer support for everything from medication management to cooking dinner to simply lending a little companionship. Our services can include: ● Skilled Nursing Care: Hospital-quality care that’s delivered at home. We offer the full range of nursing services and clinical specialties to patients of all ages, including support for managing both chronic and acute medical conditions. ● Physical, Occupational and Speech Therapy: Physical, occupational and speech therapists use proven rehabilitation techniques to help patients live fuller, more independent lives. ● Telehealth: A simple-to-use device that collects vital signs, such as blood pressure, pulse oximetry, heart rate and weight, and transmits data to Holland Hospital Home Health Telehealth Services. The telehealth team will take appropriate action if a patient’s health status requires intervention. In-Home Medical Care Care Resources PACE 616-913-2006 https://www.careresources.org Home care services provided by Care Resources staff when recommended by our team of healthcare professionals. In-Home Medical Care Spectrum Health Visiting Nurse Association 616-486-3900 https://www.spectrumhealth.org/patient-care/at-home-care/visiting-nurses Visiting Nurse Association offers a number of specialized programs and services to help you improve your health and safety in the comfort of your home. Once your needs have been identified, a personalized care plan will be developed.
    [Show full text]
  • In Ingham County, Bert C
    S.pringport Bindery SDringport, Mich. tWSi Vol. 105 No. 53 December 30, 1964 2 Sections, 22 Pages lO~ Per Copy Goodbye Millions !WillI Pour and Into Roqd Proiects Mason wUl soon be surrounded with several million dollars a grade separation at Covert Rd. worth of state road work, and US-127 near Mason, esti­ Hello The projects w111 be part of mated cost, $568,000, to be put the plan to put US-127 to full under contract in October. freeway status, Here is the latest Already under contract are 2 other jobs, the Columbia road Old Man 1964 bows out Thursday night midst schedule of cantract lettings, for the project. overpass and the Cedar street all the celebrating which usually goes along with Constructlon of a grade separ­ interchange, They were placed under contract along with inter­ atlon at US-127 and College Rd., the cutting of the ties of the past and start of a changes at Bellevue road at Les­ new year. estimated cost, $125,000, tp be put under contract in April, lie and Territorial road on the Ingharn-Jackson county line. The old one has been a blinger. It was Construction of 3,7 mlles of Biggest part of the project wlll US-127 Freeway from Mason marked with progress for Mason in almost every be the 3, 7 miles of new 4-lane field of endeavor. north to Holt Rd., estimated cost, construction between the Mason $2.5 m1llion, To be put uhder Voters gave the go ahead to school operating contract in June.
    [Show full text]
  • CVS PHARMACY 13580 Grand River Avenue Detroit, MI 48227 TABLE of CONTENTS
    NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING CVS PHARMACY 13580 Grand River Avenue Detroit, MI 48227 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Profile II. Location Overview III. Market & Tenant Overview Executive Summary Photographs Demographic Report Investment Highlights Aerial Market Overview Property Overview Site Plan Tenant Overview Map NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING DISCLAIMER STATEMENT DISCLAIMER The information contained in the following Offering Memorandum is proprietary and strictly confidential. STATEMENT: It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from The Boulder Group and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of The Boulder Group. This Offering Memorandum has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. The Boulder Group has not made any investigation and makes no warranty or representation. The information contained in this Offering Memorandum has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however, The Boulder Group has not verified, and will not verify, any of the information contained herein, nor has The Boulder Group conducted any investigation regarding these matters and makes no warranty or representation whatsoever regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. All potential buyers must take appropriate measures to verify all of the information set forth herein. NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE The Boulder Group is pleased to exclusively market for sale a single tenant net leased CVS Pharmacy located in SUMMARY: Detroit, Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 11, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1
    PLANNING COMMISSION Chairperson Larry Fox Hartland Township Vice‐Chairperson 2655 Clark Road Jeff Newsom Hartland, MI 48353 Secretary (810) 632‐7498 Larry Hopkins FAX (810) 632‐6950 www.hartlandtwp.com Sue Grissim Michael Mitchell Tom Murphy Keith Voight PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 11, 2014 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of Meeting Agenda – September 11, 2014 5. Approval of Meeting Minutes – August 14, 2014 6. Call to Public 7. Public Hearing 8. Old and New Business A. Discussion of Zimmerman/Volk’s Analysis of Residential Market Potential for Hartland Township Discussion on the findings of the report and the impact those findings will have on the pending update to the Future Land Use chapter and Future Lanbd Use Map of the Township’s Comprehensive Plan 9. Call to Public 10. Planner’s Report 11. Committee Reports 12. Adjournment Agenda Last Updated: September 4, 2014 Next Scheduled Meeting September 25, 2014 Welcome to the Hartland Township Planning Commission For those in the audience who are not familiar with the operation of the Planning Commission, the following paragraphs provide some general information concerning the meeting procedures. Procedure for Public Participation (Section 4.0 of Bylaws) A limit of three (3) minutes per participant during the call to the public shall be permitted for any written or oral statements. The unofficial policy of the Commission will be to accept public input during the meeting for topics under discussion. If necessary, the Chair may set time limits for public participation during any meeting to ensure an orderly meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Justice and Equity Appendices
    Mayor’s Report on Racial Justice and Equity Appendices AUGUST • 2021 1 MAYOR’S REPORT ON RACIAL JUSTICE AND EQUITY 2 MAYOR’S REPORT ON RACIAL JUSTICE AND EQUITY Apendix A History of Lansing 3 MAYOR’S REPORT ON RACIAL JUSTICE AND EQUITY Lansing: A Brief History to Set the Stage The first person of European descent to travel through the area that is now Lansing was British fur trader Hugh Heward and his French-Canadian team. This happened on April 24, 1790 while canoeing the Grand River. In 1827, the densely forested land was surveyed as “Township 4 North Range 2 West,” and three years later was offered up for sale. There would be no roads to this area for decades to come. In 1836, two brothers from New York plotted the area just south of downtown Lansing and named it “Biddle City”. This land lay in a floodplain and was underwater most of the year. But this didn’t stop the brothers from returning to Lansing, New York, where they sold these plots of land to unsuspecting New Yorkers. Nearly 20 men bought plots of land in a city they were told was an area of 65 blocks and had a church and a public square. They arrived only to find they’d been scammed. Most went on to live in other areas of Michigan that had actually already been settled. Lansing remained a settlement of fewer than 20 until the winter of 1847 when the state constitution required the capital be moved from Detroit to a more central and safe location in the state’s interior.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation
    NFS Form 10-900-b 1024-0018 (March 1992) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service OCT 2 9 1999 National Register of Historic Places NAT REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each Hem by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission _ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing_____________________________ Historic Highway Bridges of Michigan, 1875-1948 B. Associated Historic Contexts__________________________ (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Evolution of Michigan's Highway Bridges, 1875-1948 Wayne County: An Exemplary Road Commission, 1906-1948 C. Form Prepared by________ name/title Charlene K. Roise and Clayton B. Fraser (Fraserdesign), Historians_____ organization Hessr Roise and Company______________ date August 1998 street & number 100 North First Street____________ telephone 612-338-1987_________ city or town Minneapolis state Minnesota____ zip code 55401 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth irf 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards /and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices for Road Weather Management
    Best Practices for Road Weather Management Version 3.0 June 2012 Acknowledgments While many individuals deserve recognition, the authors want to particularly acknowledge all the staff at the participating state departments of transportation who provided materials and were generous with their time and expertise. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration. Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. ii Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-12-046 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2012 Best Practices for Road Weather Management, Version 3.0 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Co-Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Ray Murphy, FHWA; Ryan Swick, Booz Allen Hamilton; Gabe Guevara, FHWA 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Industrial Land for Sale in Lansing, MI
    RACER TRUST PROPERTY AVAILABLE IN LANSING, MI 1 UNDER CONTRACT Prime industrial land for sale in Lansing, MI Created November 2, 2012 • Updated November 25, 2019 racertrust.org racertrust.org RACER TRUST PROPERTY AVAILABLE IN LANSING, MI 2 Table of Contents 3 Property Summary 4 Property Location 5 Property Assets 7 Property Details 9 Property Ownership and Recent History 10 Environmental Conditions 11 Conceptual Site Plan 12 Collateral Information, including: Transportation Assets * Access/Linkage * Airports * Port Facilities * Regional Bus Service * Utilities and Natural Gas * Zoning and Business Assistance * Small Business Centers 20 Directory* of Financial Programs and Incentives Available in Michigan 28 Regional Overview, including: Community Snapshot * Workforce * Education * Largest Employers * Medical Facilities and Emergency Services * Links to Helpful Resources 34 Demographic* Information 36 RACER Summary 37 Conditions 38 Transaction Guidelines/Offer Instructions 39 Links for Buyers racertrust.org RACER TRUST PROPERTY AVAILABLE IN LANSING, MI 3 Property Summary Lansing Plant 6 Industrial Land 401 North Verlinden Avenue Lansing, MI 48915 Directly adjacent to two other former GM manufacturing properties owned by RACER — Lansing Plant 2 and Lansing Plant 3 — this property is immediately south of Interstate 69 and north of nearby Interstate 496, and is bordered by railroad tracks on the west, and a residential neighborhood on the east. County: Ingham Land Area: 57.26 acres General Description: Vacant parcel Zoning: H, Heavy Industrial; I, Light Industrial; J, Parking; C, Commercial Tax Parcel Number: 33-01-01-17-101-023; 33-01-01-17-176-001 RACER Site Number: 13003 More information about this property may be reviewed on RACER’s website at www.racertrust.org/Properties/PropertyDetail/Lansing_6_13003.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Freeway Congestion & Reliabliity Report-Metro Region
    2016 Freeway Congestion & Reliability Report MACOMB Chapter 4 OAKLAND METRO REGION WAYNE SUMMARY Contents Performance Measures Definitions .......................1 Regional Congestion Severity ................................3 Regional Congestion Miles by Severity .................7 Ranked UDC by Location .......................................8 Mobility Measures: I-75 Corridor .........................10 Mobility Measures: I-94 Corridor .........................22 Mobility Measures: I-96 Corridor .........................34 Mobility Measures: I-275 Corridor .......................48 Mobility Measures: I-696 Corridor .......................54 Mobility Measures: M-10 Corridor ......................64 Mobility Measures: M-14 Corridor ......................72 Mobility Measures: M-39 Corridor ......................76 Mobility Measures: M-53 Corridor ......................84 Mobility Measures: M-59 Corridor ......................90 > FREEWAY CONGESTION & RELIABILITY REPORT > Freeway Performance Measures Chapter 4 Performance Measures Definitions Delay No Delay Delay POSTED SPEED 60 MPH* ACTUAL SPEED Total delay > Delay is calculated by taking the difference between actual speeds when they fall below 60 mph and the posted speed limit for freeways posted atPOSTED 70 mph. SPEE DThis is to take Recurring out the delay caused by the lower average speeds from commercial 60vehicles. MPH Recurring Total delay per mile > Delay per mile is calculated by taking the totalAVERA delayGE SPEED and dividing it by the length of the freeway. This was performed
    [Show full text]