Plant Genetic Diversity in Agriculture and Farmers’ Rights in Norway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plant Genetic Diversity in Agriculture and Farmers’ Rights in Norway FNI Report 17/2012 Plant genetic diversity in agriculture and farmers’ rights in Norway Regine Andersen Plant genetic diversity in agriculture and farmers’ rights in Norway Regine Andersen [email protected] October 2012 Copyright © Fridtjof Nansen Institute 2012 Title Plant Genetic Diversity in Agriculture and Farmers’ Rights in Norway Translated from the Norwegian ‘Plantemangfold i jordbruket og bønders rettigheter i Norge’, FNI Report 11/2011 (Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute) Publication Type and Number Pages FNI-rapport 17/2012 119 Author ISBN Regine Andersen 978-82-7613-659-3 ISSN 1893-5486 Abstract This report takes the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture as a point of departure and analyses achievements, gaps and needs with regard to its implementation in Norway, with focus on its provisions on farmers’ rights. Although much crop genetic diversity has been lost in Norway, substantial efforts are being made to save what is left, and to ensure farmers’ rights. Regulations on plant varieties and seed marketing represent some of the barriers, but much depends on how they will be implemented in the time to come. Traditional knowledge is disappearing, despite efforts to stop this. A consolidated strategy is lacking. Economic incentive structures are not yet in place, except for some ‘seed money’, so most of the work is based on pure idealism. Farmers involved in crop genetic diversity could participate more actively in decision making if they were better organized. The system of public consultation is seriously challenged by Norway’s EEA membership, due to the high ‘turnover’ of decisions requiring implementation at the national level, lack of transparency, and because Norwegian opinions on decisions from the EU carry so little weight. To achieve a say in these matters, it would probably be more useful to work together with other European organizations involved in this issue-area. Nevertheless, much has happened in recent years to facilitate the realization of farmers’ rights and enhance the pool of crop genetic resources available to farmers. Key Words International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, biodiversity, farmers, farmers’ rights, breeders’ rights, traditional knowledge, benefit sharing, access to genetic resources, plant genetic resources, Norway, FAO ‘We aim to be the best in the world when it comes to taking care of genetic resources’ Norwegian Minister of Agriculture and Food, 1 Lars Peder Brekk, 2011 1 At the “Great Apple Hunt’ (‘Den Store Eplejakten’), an event arranged by the Norwegian Genetic Resource Centre. Press release from the Centre dated 6 September 2011, at: http://www.skogoglandskap.no/nyheter/2011/brekkseplejakt Contents Foreword 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Why plant genetic diversity and farmers’ rights? 1 1.2 The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and farmers’ rights 2 1.3 ... but does this concern us here in Norway? 5 1.4 Methodology and structure 7 2 Background on agriculture and crop genetic diversity in Norway 8 2.1 Basic facts on agriculture in Norway 8 2.2 Structural changes and crop genetic diversity 9 2.3 Status of crop genetic diversity in Norway 10 2.3.1 Crop genetic diversity in cereals, potatoes and vegetables 10 2.3.2 Crop genetic diversity in fruits and berries 13 2.3.3 Crop genetic diversity in meadow plants 14 2.3.4 The informal seed sector 18 2.3.5 Challenges to research and breeding 20 2.4 Access to seed material 21 2.5 Plant breeding and the value chain for seed material 24 3 Farmers’ rights in Norway: Basic considerations 28 3.1 Norwegian views and work at the international level 28 3.2 Farmers’ views on farmers’ rights in Norway 29 3.3 Other views on farmers’ rights in Norway 32 3.4 What is covered by farmers’ rights in Norway? 32 4 The right to save, use, exchange and sell seed 33 4.1 Plant breeders’ rights and farmers’ rights 33 4.1.1 Norway and the Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) 34 4.1.2 Proposal to strengthen plant breeders’ rights 35 4.1.3 Draft law rejected with reference to farmers’ rights 35 4.2 Regulations on plant variety release and the marketing of seed and seed potatoes 36 4.2.1Prohibition years 2004–2010: Ban on private seed exchange/sales 37 4.2.2Background to the prohibitions 38 4.2.3 Reactions in Norway. EU Commission Directive 2008/62/EC on conservation varieties 39 Regine Andersen 4.2.4 Disagreement over Commission Directive 2008/62/E: Winds of change 41 4.2.5 Proposal by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority for relaxation of three central regulations 43 4.2.6 More EU seed directives: Vegetables and fodder-plant mixtures 45 4.2.7 Current rules and practice to date 48 4.2.8 Impact of the regulations on genetic diversity in varieties and on farmers’ rights 50 4.3 Norwegian patent legislation 51 4.4 Experiences and reflections on farmers’ rights to save, use, exchange and sell seeds 53 4.4.1 Conventional farmers 53 4.4.2 Biodiversity farmers 54 4.4.3 Plant breeders 56 4.4.4 Authorized seed shops 57 4.4.5 Common stand 58 4.5 Preliminary conclusions on farmers’ rights to save, use, exchange and sell seeds 59 5. Rights linked to relevant traditional knowledge 61 5.1 Farmers’ traditional knowledge of genetic resources in Norway 62 5.2 Measures to document and spread traditional knowledge 64 5.3 Relevant regulations on traditional knowledge 68 5.4 Farmers’ reflections on traditional knowledge 71 5.5 Preliminary conclusions on traditional knowledge 73 6 Benefit-sharing and the use of genetic resources 75 6.1 Incentive structures and support for conservation work 76 6.2 Farmers’ access to crop genetic diversity, and conservation measures 81 6.3 Information, capacity-building and technology transfer 84 6.4 Norway and benefit-sharing with the South 87 6.5 Farmers’ reflections on the right to benefit-sharing 90 6.6 Conclusions on farmers’ rights to benefit-sharing 92 7 The right to participation in decision-making processes 94 7.1 Organizations representing farmers in Norway 96 7.2 Legislation on farmers’ participation in decision-making processes 99 7.3 Farmers’ participation in relevant decision-making processes 99 Evaluering av miljøvernsamarbeidet mellom Norge og Russland 7.4 Farmers’ reflections on participation in decision-making processes 102 7.5 Preliminary conclusions on farmers’ rights to participation in decision-making processes 103 8 Summary, conclusions and recommendations 105 Status of crop genetic diversity and seed/propagation materials for farmers 105 Why farmers’ rights are important, and what they entail 106 The right to save, use, exchange and sell seeds 106 Recommendations 108 Rights related to relevant traditional knowledge 108 Recommendations 109 The right to share benefits accruing from the use of genetic resources 110 Recommendations 111 The right to participate in decision-making processes 112 Recommendations 113 References 114 Annex: Interviews and meetings 117 Foreword Plant genetic diversity for food and agriculture represents a vast reservoir of fascinating tastes, smells, colours, nutrients, stories and possibilities. It constitutes the genetic basis for all food production, and is of decisive importance for our chances to adapt agriculture to changing environ- mental conditions, such as climate change. Maintaining and developing crop genetic diversity can be seen as a life assurance policy for future generations, while also giving us possibilities today for dealing with shifting nutritional needs and the demand for more environmentally friendly agricultural production. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (the Plant Treaty) is aimed at the conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic resources, and that the benefits accruing from their use are shared in a fair and equitable manner. The challenges are considerable in a world that has lost much of its crop genetic diversity in the course of the past hundred years, and which has still not managed to reverse this negative trend. An important aspect here is to enable farmers to carry on their work of conserving, cultivating and further developing crop genetic diversity – practices that over the past 10,000 years have provided the rich diversity the world has today. To that end, the Plant Treaty has specific provisions concerning farmers’ rights. In 2005, the Fridtjof Nansen Institute established a long-term project to support the implementation of farmers’ rights, as they are provided for in the Plant Treaty through research-based guidance. We have facilitated several international consultations, conducted in-depth analyses of national implementation in selected countries, collected success stories, established an international network, held seminars and lectures, and published the results at our website www.farmersrights.org. As part of the FNI Farmers’ Rights Project, this report aims to offer an overview on the management of agricultural plant genetic diversity in Norway, taking farmers’ rights as its point of departure, and identifying what can be done to better ensure the implementation of the Plant Treaty in this area. This report has been five years in the making. Farmers’ rights proved to be undergoing rapid change, and so our work became an ongoing research endeavour of monitoring developments and documenting the processes in Norway. Thereby the process of developing this report also influenced, to a certain extent, the political decision making documented here. Such influence is always a challenge in social science, and is mentioned specifically in this report where relevant. The report is the product of a highly participatory process. In addition to document analyses, participation at meetings, seminars and consultations with stakeholders, as well as interviews with farmers, representatives of farmers’ organizations, the seed industry and the relevant authorities have also been central.
Recommended publications
  • Adresseliste Høring Frivillig Vern Av Skog Ti Områder I Oppland Juni 2018
    ADRESSELISTE HØRING FRIVILLIG VERN AV SKOG TI OMRÅDER I OPPLAND JUNI 2018 Grunneiere Kåre H. Fruseth, Barstadvegen 73, 2838 Snertingdal Tom Arne Harbu, Klundbyvegen 332, 2836 Biri Ragnhild Aanes Hov, Snertingdalsvegen 1759, 2838 Snertingdal Anne og Arne Reidar Wallin, Austdalfeltvegen 72, 2838 Snertingdal Anne E. Opdal, Kongsvegen 421, 2636 Øyer Gunn Åshild Fruseth Alund og Jan-Tore Alund, Snertingdalsvegen 2020, 2838 Snertingdal Egil Skar, Engesetvegen 27 B, 6153 Ørsta Helge Ingar Barkenæs, Heidalsvegen 2477, 2676 Heidal Einar Brobakken, Sjolivegen 1225, 2676 Heidal 3 Tor Gunnar Brurusten, Murudalsvegen 417, 2676 Heidal Terje Djupdalen, Heidalsvegen 2408, 2676 Heidal Tor Ekre, Heidalsvegen 2159, 2676 Heidal Jo Fjerdingren, Paralellen 31, 1430 Ås Kjell Fjerdingren, Lansevegen 28, 6783 Stryn Ola Fjerdingren, Heidalsvegen 2350, 2676 Heidal Allan Hagen, Heidalsvegen 2136, 2676 Heidal Inge Håvard Hansen, Heidalsvegen 2360, 2676 Heidal Synnøve Rindhølen Harerusten, Sjolivegen 1697, 2676 Heidal Arne Tommy Haugen, Aurfaret 17, 2618 Lillehammer Øyvind Holen, Heidalsvegen 2209, 2676 Heidal Sverre Holshagen, Sjolivegen 1402, 2676 Heidal Petter Horgen, Heidalsvegen 1552, 2676 Heidal Knut Ivar Klashaugen, Runningsvegen 51, 2676 Heidal Paul Magne Langrusten, Sjolivegen 1375, 2676 Heidal Magny Grethe Lien, Sjolivegen 332, 2677 Heidal Hilde E. og Erling Lusæter, Lusetervegen 245, 2676 Heidal Odd Ivar Mosebakken, Sjolivegen 1345, 2676 Heidal Jon Rudi, Heidalsvegen 2434, 2676 Heidal Gro Anita Sanden og Jan Egil Steinfinsbø, Heidalsvegen 2386, 2676 Heidal
    [Show full text]
  • Pantebøker: Oppland Fylke Dagens Tidligere Inndeling Sorenskriverembete Pantebøker I SAH Kommunenavn Finnes T.O.M
    Pantebøker: Oppland fylke Dagens Tidligere inndeling Sorenskriverembete Pantebøker i SAH kommunenavn finnes t.o.m. 1950. (2016) Yngre protokoller er registrert her Dovre Dovre gnr. 1-73. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Skilt fra Lesja i 1863. Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger Gnr. 23/3 overført til Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. Alvdal fra 1910, gnr. 02.01.1951. 178/1 i Alvdal. Lesja Lesja gnr. 1-145. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Dovre gnr. 1-73 (fradelt Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger 1863). Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. Øvre Folldalen til Alvdal (Alvdal: Nord-Østerdal) 02.01.1951. (Lille-Elvedalen) i Hedmark fylke 1864, gnr. 79-172. Skjåk Skjåk gnr. 1-128. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Skilt fra Lom i 1866. Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. 02.01.1951. Lom Lom gnr. 1-139. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Skjåk gnr. 1-128 (fradelt Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger 1866). Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. 02.01.1951. Sel Heidal, gnr. 172-197. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Skilt fra Vågå 1908 Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger (Slått sammen med Sel Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- -(C-pantebøker) t.o.m. 1964.) 02.01.1951. Sel Sel, gnr. 198-300. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Skilt fra Vågå 1908. Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger (Slått sammen med Heidal Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m. 1964.) 02.01.1951. Vågå Vågå gnr. 1-284. ‘Sorenskriverier i Nord-Gudbrandsdal Heidal gnr. 172-197 Gudbrandsdalen’ -1731 sorenskriveri: Påtegninger (fradelt 1908). Nord-Gudbrandsdal 1731- - (C-pantebøker) t.o.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Kartlegging Av Horndykkerbestanden I Vardal/Snertingdal/Biri, Oppland 2018
    E N RAPPORT UTARBEIDET A V DOKKADELTAET VÅTMA RKSSENTER AS KARTLEGGING AV HORNDYKKERBESTANDEN I VARDAL/SNERTINGDAL/BIRI, OPPLAND 2018 1. NOVEMBER 2018 eller to linjer KARTL EGGINGRAPPORT AV HORNDYKKER 201BESTANDEN8:9 I VARDAL/SNERTINGDAL/B IRI, OPPLAND 2018 Utførende institusjon: Dokkadeltaet Våtmarkssenter AS Prosjektansvarlig: Prosjektmedarbeider: Trond Øigarden Oppdragsgiver: Kontaktperson: Fylkesmannen i Troms Heidi Marie Gabler Referanse: Øigarden, T. 2018. Kartlegging av horndykkerbestanden i Vardal/Snertingdal/Biri, Oppland 2018. Dokkadeltaet Våtmarkssenter AS. Rapport 2018-9 Sammendrag: Horndykker Podiceps auritus er i Norsk rødliste for arter 2015 listet som "sårbar" (VU). Horndykkeren har sine viktigste hekkeområder i Nord-Trøndelag, Nordland og Troms. Hedmark og Oppland har også bestander av nasjonal betydning. Direktoratet for naturforvaltning utarbeidet i 2009 en handlingsplan for horndykker. Det ble foreslått at bestandsutviklingen følges årlig i fem overvåkingsområder: Porsanger, Finnmark, Balsfjord/Storfjord, Troms, Bø/Vestvågøy, Nordland, Levanger/Stjørdal/Verdal, Nord-Trøndelag, Vardal/Snertingdalen/Biri, Oppland. Dokkadeltaet Våtmarkssenter har fått oppdraget med registreringen i overvåkingsområdet i Oppland i 2018. Det ble i undersøkelsesområdet i 2018 registrert 14 par horndykkere, og registrert minst 18 unger. Årets resultat det høyeste siden 2007. Horndykkeren er kjent for å variere i antall lokalt. Dette gjør det vanskelig å konkludere med bestandsnedgang eller -oppgang, derimot tyder tallene på at det er en rimelig
    [Show full text]
  • Samer I Østerdalen? En Studie Av Etnisitet I Jernalderen
    Samer i Østerdalen? En studie av etnisitet i jernalderen og middelalderen i det nordøstre Hedmark Jostein Bergstøl Universitetet i Oslo 2008 Innholdsfortegnelse: Kapittel 1.................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Innledning........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1. Overordnede problemstillinger ................................................................................ 1 1.1.2. Presentasjon av studieområdet ................................................................................. 2 1.1.3. Noen begrepsavklaringer.......................................................................................... 3 1.2. Forskningshistorie .......................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1. ”Norrønt” og ”samisk” i forhistorien ....................................................................... 3 1.2.2. Samisk (for)historie.................................................................................................. 5 1.2.3. ”Den Norske Jernalderen”........................................................................................ 6 1.2.4. Fangstfolk i sør.........................................................................................................9 1.2.5. Jernalderen i Østerdalsområdet .............................................................................. 11
    [Show full text]
  • On the Lower Didymograptus Zone (3 B) at Ringsaker, and Contemporaneous Deposit S in Scandinavia
    138 NORSK GEOLOGISK TIDSSKRIFT 30. ON THE LOWER DIDYMOGRAPTUS ZONE (3 B) AT RINGSAKER, AND CONTEMPORANEOUS DEPOSIT S IN SCANDINAVIA BY STEINAR SKJESETH Contents. Abstract ......................................................... 138 Acknowledgement 139 Introduction 139 Histo11ical account of earlier research . 139 An introduction to the stratigraphy and tectonics of Southern Ringsaker 140 The Lower Didymograptus Zone (3 b) at Ringsaker . 143 Notes on the sediments . 147 Correlation of the 3 b sediments in Scandinavia . 148 The Planilimbata Limestone, "The Planilimbata Zone" . 155 Systematic description of trilobites . 156 Family Agnostidae . !57 Remopleurdiidae . 157 Asaphidae . 158 Styginidae 171 Oheiruridae . 17 3 Lichadidae . 174 Ceratopygidae . 175 Raphiophoridae 176 References . 179 Expanation of plates . 173 A b s t ra c t. The two upper sub-zones of the Lower Didymograptus Beds (3 b) appear in limestone-trilobite facies at Heramb, Ringsaker, Nor­ way. The layers at Heramb correspond to the Planilim:bata Limestone, or part of it, and the beds are correlated with corresponding deposits elsewhere in Scandinavia. The 3 b sediments are deposited in a more or less closed basin on the Scandinavian Foreland. In this basin the different facies of the 3 b sediments have a dtstinct distl'libution. The trilobites from the upper sub­ zones of 3 b at Heramb are described, among them three new trilobite species: Megalaspis Tingsakerensis sp. n. Ptychopyge herambensis sp. n. mi-noT sp. n. Ampyx �:olborthi Schm[dt is transferred to the genus Lonchodornas. LOWER DIDYMOGRAPTUS ZONE 139 ACKNOWL EDG EM ENT It is a pleasure to express my heartiest and most sincere thanks to Professor L. Størmer and Curator G.
    [Show full text]
  • Travet I Oppland
    Travet i Oppland Oppland Fylke. 387 starthester i 2009. Areal 25.192 km2. 293 starthesteeiere. 26 kommune. 1 starthesteeier per 624 innbyggere. 182.972 innbyggere. Kr 17.525.397 innkjørt. 13 travlag. 1152 travlagsmedlemmer. 1 Kommune Hester startet Innkjørt Eiere 1. Dovre 5 2.481.341 3 2. Gausdal 28 569.000 20 3. Gjøvik 60 1.541.099 45 4. Gran 70 2.598.174 51 5. Jevnaker 9 173.000 9 6. Lesja 4 128.500 4 7. Lillehammer 25 1.822.035 15 8. Lunner 24 1.280.080 20 9. Nord-Aurdal 6 283.000 6 10. Nord-Fron 11 198.500 7 11. Nordre Land 9 210.000 9 12. Ringebu 13 707.295 8 13. Sel 6 68.500 4 14. Søndre Land 7 220.710 4 15. Sør-Aurdal 2 53.000 2 16. Sør-Fron 4 28.000 3 17. Vang 3 14.500 2 18. Vestre Slidre 6 421.500 3 19. Vestre Toten 40 1.955.915 32 20. Vågå 4 78.500 2 21. Østre Toten 45 2.446.422 39 22. Øyer 3 80.500 2 23. Øystre Slidre 3 165.826 3 387 17.525.397 293 3 kommuner hadde ikke starthest i 2009. Travlag Medlemmer 1. Biri og Snertingdal Travlag 148 2. Eina Travlag 42 3. Gjøvik Travselskap 87 4. Gudbrandsdal Travlag 120 5. Hadeland Travselskap 169 6. Jotunheimen Tråvlag 25 7. Lillehammer og Omland Travselskap 79 8. Nord-Gudbrandsdal Travlag 63 9. Randfjord Travselskap 49 10. Toten Travselskap 123 11. Valdres Travlag 84 12. Vestopplandenes Travselskap 63 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Bergli 001206.Indd
    Anton og Stennethe Bergli 1 Anton og Stennethe Bergli Boka er skrevet, redigert, innbundet, finansiert og utgitt av: Rolf Steinar Bergli, Kartheia 65C, 4626 Kristiansand Telefon: 38 01 66 90 Hjemmeside: http://www.rolf.bergli.com Opplag: 1. utgave desember 2000 Skrifttype: Garamond, 12 pkt. Print: Wilhelmsen kopi og print, Kristiansand. 2 Anton og Stennethe Bergli Innhold FORORD...................................................................................................7 OPPLYSNINGER TIL LESEREN..........................................................9 ANTONS BARNDOM ........................................................................... 13 ANTONS FAMILIE................................................................................ 16 BERTHESTUGGUA.......................................................................................................17 STENNETHES BARNDOM................................................................. 19 STENNETHES FAMILIE ..................................................................... 22 ANTON OG STENNETHE.................................................................. 24 ANTON I MILITÆRET – 1905 ....................................................................................24 VALDRESBANEN.........................................................................................................25 ANTON OG STENNETHE GIFTER SEG.......................................... 26 BERGLI................................................................................................... 28
    [Show full text]
  • Norway Maps.Pdf
    Finnmark lVorwny Trondelag Counties old New Akershus Akershus Bratsberg Telemark Buskerud Buskerud Finnmarken Finnmark Hedemarken Hedmark Jarlsberg Vestfold Kristians Oppland Oppland Lister og Mandal Vest-Agder Nordre Bergenshus Sogn og Fjordane NordreTrondhjem NordTrondelag Nedenes Aust-Agder Nordland Nordland Romsdal Mgre og Romsdal Akershus Sgndre Bergenshus Hordaland SsndreTrondhjem SorTrondelag Oslo Smaalenenes Ostfold Ostfold Stavanger Rogaland Rogaland Tromso Troms Vestfold Aust- Municipal Counties Vest- Agder Agder Kristiania Oslo Bergen Bergen A Feiring ((r Hurdal /\Langset /, \ Alc,ersltus Eidsvoll og Oslo Bjorke \ \\ r- -// Nannestad Heni ,Gi'erdrum Lilliestrom {", {udenes\ ,/\ Aurpkog )Y' ,\ I :' 'lv- '/t:ri \r*r/ t *) I ,I odfltisard l,t Enebakk Nordbv { Frog ) L-[--h il 6- As xrarctaa bak I { ':-\ I Vestby Hvitsten 'ca{a", 'l 4 ,- Holen :\saner Aust-Agder Valle 6rrl-1\ r--- Hylestad l- Austad 7/ Sandes - ,t'r ,'-' aa Gjovdal -.\. '\.-- ! Tovdal ,V-u-/ Vegarshei I *r""i'9^ _t Amli Risor -Ytre ,/ Ssndel Holt vtdestran \ -'ar^/Froland lveland ffi Bergen E- o;l'.t r 'aa*rrra- I t T ]***,,.\ I BYFJORDEN srl ffitt\ --- I 9r Mulen €'r A I t \ t Krohnengen Nordnest Fjellet \ XfC KORSKIRKEN t Nostet "r. I igvono i Leitet I Dokken DOMKIRKEN Dar;sird\ W \ - cyu8npris Lappen LAKSEVAG 'I Uran ,t' \ r-r -,4egry,*T-* \ ilJ]' *.,, Legdene ,rrf\t llruoAs \ o Kirstianborg ,'t? FYLLINGSDALEN {lil};h;h';ltft t)\l/ I t ,a o ff ui Mannasverkl , I t I t /_l-, Fjosanger I ,r-tJ 1r,7" N.fl.nd I r\a ,, , i, I, ,- Buslr,rrud I I N-(f i t\torbo \) l,/ Nes l-t' I J Viker -- l^ -- ---{a - tc')rt"- i Vtre Adal -o-r Uvdal ) Hgnefoss Y':TTS Tryistr-and Sigdal Veggli oJ Rollag ,y Lvnqdal J .--l/Tranbv *\, Frogn6r.tr Flesberg ; \.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative and Statistical Areas English Version – SOSI Standard 4.0
    Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 Administrative and statistical areas Norwegian Mapping Authority [email protected] Norwegian Mapping Authority June 2009 Page 1 of 191 Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 1 Applications schema ......................................................................................................................7 1.1 Administrative units subclassification ....................................................................................7 1.1 Description ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.1 CityDistrict ................................................................................................................ 14 1.1.2 CityDistrictBoundary ................................................................................................ 14 1.1.3 SubArea ................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.4 BasicDistrictUnit ....................................................................................................... 15 1.1.5 SchoolDistrict ........................................................................................................... 16 1.1.6 <<DataType>> SchoolDistrictId ............................................................................... 17 1.1.7 SchoolDistrictBoundary ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dramaet På Bjønnhaugen I Vardal
    l l Stiftelsen norsk Okkupasjonshistorie, 2014 ;;1/ '-".\ 'j i . Pris kr, 1,00 l j ',_,' "': i.. Beretninger fra krigsårene på Vestoplandene Xr.2 Dramaet på Bjønnhaugen i Vardal Det var det første «slippet» i denne del av Vardal som skulde tas imot. En ulike kamp på liv og død - med to falne på hver side. På et ensomt sted mellom Vibergs­ tyskerne hadde fått rede på dette er aldri blitt opp­ roa i 'Vardal, Snertingdal og Landås• klart, men av det store oppbud tyskerne møtte med, bygda ligger Bjønnhaugen, som i be­ kan en slutte at de hadde rede på at det var en gynnelsen av ~ars i fjor var åstedet engelsk agent med. Det var tydelig at de hadde for en tragisk hendelse. Som en vil truffet all,~ forholdsregler for å hindre at denne huske, hadde tyskerne fått snusen i at agenten skulde slippe vekk. Det gjorde han imidlertid tre H.S.-gutter hadde tilhold der; likevel, som det vil framgå senere. hytta ble omringet og to Gjøvik-gutter - Willy Lund og Ragnvald Nilsen - kom aldri tilbake. Nedenfor gir vi en Et budskap som kom for sent. skildring av dramaet, bygget på ut­ Da meldingen om tyskerne kom til Øygard, tok sagn fra det eneste øyenvitne. denne øyeblikkelig skritt til å få varslet de tre i. hytta. Hans 15 år gamle sønn, Ivar, som i øyeblikket befant I begynnelsen av mars i fjor skulde det første seg hos landhandleren, ble budsendt, og han ble sendt slippet i denrie del av Vardal finne sted i nærheten videre direkte til hytta for å varsle.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting in Northern Europe Until 1500 AD Old Traditions and Regional
    Hunting in northern Europe until 1500 AD Old traditions and regional developments, continental sources and continental influences The 7th century’s royal follower’s grave at mid-east Swedish Rickeby (Uppland) – the deceased one with his horse, several dogs, several raptor birds, several birds which represent the typical prey of falconry plus food gifts (drawing Ulla Malmsten). ScHriftEn DES ArcHäOlOgiScHEn lAnDESmuSEumS Ergänzungsreihe Band 7 Herausgegeben vom Archäologischen landesmuseum und dem Zentrum für Baltische und Skandinavische Archäologie in der Stiftung Schleswig-Holsteinische landesmuseen Schloss gottorf durch claus von carnap-Bornheim Hunting in northern Europe until 1500 AD Old traditions and regional developments, continental sources and continental influences Edited by Oliver grimm und ulrich Schmölcke Papers presented at a workshop organized by the centre for Baltic and Scandinavian Archaeology (ZBSA) Schleswig, June 16th and 17th, 2011 Wachholtz front matter illustration: after l. Sjösvärd/m. Vretemark/H. gustavson, A Vendel warrior from Vallentuna. in: J. P. lamm/ H.-Å nordström (eds.), Vendel Period Studies. transactions of the Boat-grave symposium Stockholm 1981 (Stockholm 1983) 133–150, fig. 5. iSBn 978 3 529 01877 0 redaktion: isabel Sonnenschein Satz und Bildbearbeitung: Jürgen Schüller, matthias Bolte Bibliografischei nformation der Deutschen nationalbibliothek. Die Deutsche nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind imi nternet
    [Show full text]
  • Og Servicesenter, H
    1. Vang speidergruppe 3. Eidsvoll speidergruppe 4H Hedmark Askjumlia velforening Balke Barnegospel Balke bo- og servicesenter, Hagegruppe Balke Pensjonistlag Barnas kulturdag på Stenberg Bilitt Vel Støttegruppe Biri IL Biri Seniordans Blomhaugskole FAU Borglund Vel Brystkreftforeningen Gjøvik-Toten BURG Oppland Bygdetunets Venner Bøn og Omegn Vel Bøverbru Hestesportsklubb Bøverbru idrettslag Bøverbru Vel Bøverbru/Eina Skolekorps CK Toten-tråkk Dal Idrettslag Dance4fun Dokken Velforening Eidsvold Turn Håndball Eidsvold Turnforening Fotball Eidsvold Værk Musikkorps Eidsvoll 1814´s Eidsvoll Basketball klubb Eidsvoll Speidergruppe Eidsvoll Svømmeklubb Eidsvold Værks Skiklub Eina Bygdekvinnelag Eina Dagsenter Eina Sanitetsforening Eina Sportsklubb Eina Ungdomsklubb Eina Vel Epilepsiforeningen i Hedmark og Oppland Feiring TeknoLab Feiringregjeringa Finnkollen Idrettslag Fjellvolls venner Forening til fremme for klassisk ballett i Gjøvik Foreningen Mot Kreft Fotballaget Fart Fredheim skolekorps Funkis IL Hedmark Furnes Bo-og aktivitetssenter, Venneforeningen Furua 4H Gartnerløkka Vel Gjøvik brettklubb Gjøvik Handicapidrettslag Gjøvik Innebandyklubb Gjøvik Jeger og Fiskerforening Gjøvik og Toten astronomiske forening Gjøvik og Toten flyklubb Gjøvik og Toten Sportsfiskeklubb Gjøvik Quiltelag Gjøvik Røde Kors Omsorg, avd. Barnehjelpen Gjøvik Skiklubb Skiskyting Gjøvik skiklubb, alpingruppa Grande Drilltropp GTL Rcklubben HalloVenn Eidsvoll Hamar Badmintonklubb Hamar Barne og Ungdomskor - Filiokus Hamar Frivilligsentral Hamar idrettslag - kunstløpgruppa
    [Show full text]