DOCSLIB.ORG

Qualitative Research Into the Root Causes of Child Abandonment and Child Relinquishment in Viet Nam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Qualitative Research Into the Root Causes of Child Abandonment and Child Relinquishment in Viet Nam Qualitative research into the root causes of child abandonment and child relinquishment in Viet Nam International Social Service with support from UNICEF Viet Nam & MOLISA 2013-2014 1 Table of content Authors .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Acronyms used .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Foreword ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1: Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 19 1.1 Viet Nam’s commitment to children’s rights .................................................................................... 19 1.2 Context of current study ................................................................................................................... 21 1.3 Specific particularities about timing of the study ............................................................................. 21 1.4 Objectives of the present study ........................................................................................................ 22 1.5 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 23 1.5.1 Research method ....................................................................................................................... 23 1.5.2 Desk review ................................................................................................................................ 24 1.5.3 Research team ........................................................................................................................... 24 1.5.4 Group interviews and expert interviews with key stakeholders ............................................... 25 1.5.5 Mixed method approach ........................................................................................................... 25 1.5.6 Semi-structured interviews ........................................................................................................ 26 1.5.7 Quantitative methods ................................................................................................................ 26 1.5.8 Research locations ..................................................................................................................... 27 1.5.9 Structure of the report ............................................................................................................... 27 1.5.10 Research limitations ................................................................................................................. 28 Chapter 2: Unravelling the terminology ..................................................................................................... 29 2.1 Complexities of the Vietnamese language ....................................................................................... 29 2.2 Child abandonment and abandoned children in Viet Nam .............................................................. 30 2.3 Child relinquishment and relinquished children in Viet Nam ........................................................... 30 2.4 Placement of children in institutions ................................................................................................ 30 2.5 Amalgam of terms and their consequences ..................................................................................... 31 Chapter 3: Scope of child abandonment, child relinquishment and children in institutions ..................... 33 3.1 Important qualifications ................................................................................................................... 33 3.2 What do we know about the magnitude of abandoned and relinquished children? ...................... 33 3.3 What we know about children in institutions................................................................................... 35 3.4 What we do not know about abandoned and relinquished children and children in institutions ... 36 Chapter 4: Child abandonment ................................................................................................................... 38 2 4.1 What do we know about nature and root causes of child abandonment? ...................................... 38 4.2 What do we know about the different actors involved when a child is abandoned? ...................... 39 4.3 What child protection measures are available when a child is abandoned? ................................... 40 4.4 What do we know about recent child abandonment trends from the research? ............................ 41 4.5 What potential risks do abandoned child face? ............................................................................... 43 4.6 What key legal frameworks address child abandonment? ............................................................... 43 4.7 What key policies address child abandonment? .............................................................................. 45 4.7a Past policies ................................................................................................................................. 45 4.7b Present and future policies ......................................................................................................... 45 Chapter 5: Child Relinquishment ................................................................................................................ 46 5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 47 5.2 What do we know about the single mothers and child relinquishment? ........................................ 47 5.3 What do we know about the decision-makers in the relinquishment process? .............................. 48 5.4 What do we know about circumstances and motives regarding child relinquishment? ................. 49 5.4a Case example 1: Trinh ................................................................................................................. 50 5.4b Case example 2: Duc and Hien .................................................................................................... 51 5.4c Circumstances characterised by multiple problems can lead to relinquishment ....................... 53 5.4d Motivations of “a better future for my child” can lead to relinquishment ................................ 53 5.4e Being an unmarried mother may lead to relinquishment .......................................................... 54 5.4f Being a girl may be an additional factor leading to relinquishment ........................................... 55 5.4g Money motivations may lead to relinquishment ........................................................................ 56 5.5 What do we know about the consequences of child relinquishment? ............................................ 57 5.5a Parents’ motives for relinquishment may be misunderstood .................................................... 57 5.5b Children who are relinquished may be adopted without the consent of parents ..................... 58 5.5c Parents’ have acute emotional needs immediately after relinquishment ................................. 59 5.5d Parents’ have unaddressed expectations and needs well after relinquishment ........................ 59 5.6 What are the laws and policies that govern child relinquishment? ................................................. 61 Chapter 6: Why institutional care is chosen for children from the mothers’/parents’ perspective .......... 62 6.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 62 6.2 What do we know about social protection centres? ........................................................................ 63 6.3 Absence of infant day-care ............................................................................................................... 64 6.3a Case example 3: Quynh ............................................................................................................... 64 6.4 HIV-infected mothers and social stigma ........................................................................................... 66 3 6.4a Case example 4: Kim ................................................................................................................... 67 6.5 Domestic violence ............................................................................................................................. 68 6.5a Case example 5: Twin sisters ...................................................................................................... 68 6.6 Administrative maze ......................................................................................................................... 69 6.6a Case example 6: Huyen ............................................................................................................... 69 6.7 Better future prospects ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Euro-Nmd Patient Representatives Booklet
    EURO-NMD PATIENT REPRESENTATIVES BOOKLET JUNE 2020 EURO-NMD Patient Representatives – 11/06/2020 1 EURO-NMD Meeting, Freiburg, 29-30 November 2017 INTRODUCTION The Patient Advisory Board (PAB) aims to ensure true and equitable representation of the voice of patients within the EURO-NMD network so that EURO-NMD services can answer to the needs and expectations of rare neuromuscular disease patients and improve access to high quality diagnosis, care and treatment. The PAB creates a bridGe between the ERN and the rare neuromuscular patient community, by coordinatinG the participation of all patient representatives in the Network, and liaisinG with its affiliated patient orGanisations. The Patient Advisory Board also endorses additional patient representatives to join Specialist Groups based on their expertise. The PAB has established its own Constitution and Rules of Procedure. Membership: Members of the PAB include those elected via EURORDIS who constitute the European Patient Advocacy Group for EURO-NMD. Members from umbrella orGanisations (e.g. Spierziekten Nederland) have also been invited to join the Patients Advisory Board to ensure a proper representation of the neuromuscular patient community amonG the PAB. ePAG representatives: ‹ François Lamy (AFM-Téléthon, France), ‹ Dimitrios Athanasiou (MDA-Hellas), ‹ Massimo Marra and Patrizia Garzena (alternate) (CIDP Italia ONLUS), ‹ Marisol Montolio (Duchenne Parent Project Spain), ‹ Michela Onali (Gli Equilibristi HIBM, Italy) ‹ Jean-Philippe Plançon (French Association against Peripheral Neuropathies, France - European Patient OrGanisation for Dysimmune and Inflammatory Neuropathies, EU), ‹ Evy Reviers (ALS LiGa Belgium), ‹ Judit Varadine Csapo (Angyalszarnyak HunGarian Muscle Dystrophy Association). Other NMD patient representatives: ‹ Madelon Kroneman (Spierziekten Nederland, Dutch Patient Society of Neuromuscular Diseases), The members of the PAB will commit to assist in the following: ‹ Governance of the ERN: The ERN Board will include the patient representatives that are part of the Patient Advisory Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Laundering: How the Intercountry Adoption System Legitimizes and Incentivizes the Practices of Buying, Trafficking, Kidnaping, and Stealing Children
    CHILD LAUNDERING: HOW THE INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION SYSTEM LEGITIMIZES AND INCENTIVIZES THE PRACTICES OF BUYING, TRAFFICKING, KIDNAPING, AND STEALING CHILDREN DAVID M. SMOLIN† Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ...................................... 115 II. THE INCIDENCE OF CHILD BUYING, STEALING, KIDNAPING, AND TRAFFICKING WITHIN THE INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION SYSTEM ... 117 A. Methods of Operation ............................. 117 1. Child Buying Scenario I ......................... 118 2. Child Buying Scenario II ........................ 119 3. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Scenario I: Kidnaping Children Placed into Orphanages, Hostels, or Schools for Purposes of Education or Care ................... 119 4. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Scenario II: Obtaining Children Through False Pretenses ........................ 121 5. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Children Scenario III: Lost Children ................................... 121 6. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Scenario IV: Traditional Kidnaping .................................. 122 7. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Scenario V: Intra-Familial Kidnaping .................................. 123 8. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Scenario VI: “Your Money or Your Baby:” Taking Children in Payment of a Debt .... 124 B. Extreme Poverty and Sending Nations .................. 124 C. Cycles of Abuse .................................. 132 D. Stories of Abuse: Tracking Child Laundering Within Various Sending Nations ................................. 135 1. Cambodia ................................... 135 2. India .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Transnational Illegal Adoption Market
    The transnational illegal adoption market Citation for published version (APA): Loibl, E. C. (2019). The transnational illegal adoption market: A criminological study of the German and Dutch intercountry adoption systems. Eleven International publishing. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20190515el Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2019 DOI: 10.26481/dis.20190515el Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Placement of Children with Relatives
    STATE STATUTES Current Through January 2018 WHAT’S INSIDE Placement of Children With Giving preference to relatives for out-of-home Relatives placements When a child is removed from the home and placed Approving relative in out-of-home care, relatives are the preferred placements resource because this placement type maintains the child’s connections with his or her family. In fact, in Placement of siblings order for states to receive federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance, federal law under title Adoption by relatives IV-E of the Social Security Act requires that they Summaries of state laws “consider giving preference to an adult relative over a nonrelated caregiver when determining a placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant state child protection standards.”1 Title To find statute information for a IV-E further requires all states2 operating a title particular state, IV-E program to exercise due diligence to identify go to and provide notice to all grandparents, all parents of a sibling of the child, where such parent has legal https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ custody of the sibling, and other adult relatives of the laws-policies/state/. child (including any other adult relatives suggested by the parents) that (1) the child has been or is being removed from the custody of his or her parents, (2) the options the relative has to participate in the care and placement of the child, and (3) the requirements to become a foster parent to the child.3 1 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor
    Santa Clara Journal of International Law Volume 18 Issue 1 Article 1 1-12-2020 Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor Jaya Reddy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Jaya Reddy, Comment, Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor, 18 SANTA CLARA J. INT'L L. 92 (2020). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil/vol18/iss1/1 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 18 SANTA CLARA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 92 (2020) Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor Jaya Reddy !92 Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor Table of Contents I. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................94 II. Background ..............................................................................................................................94 A. 2002: Legalization of Commercial Surrogacy Caused Exploitation but Allowed Impoverished Women to Escape Poverty ............................................................................................................94 B. 2005: Indian Council for Medical Research Issued Extremely Narrow Guidelines Regulating “ART” ............................................................................................................................................98
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Abandoned, Derelict Vehicles
    Municipal Code – Village of Pingree Grove __________________________________________________________________________________ Title 7: Motor Vehicles and Traffic Chapter 8 – ABANDONED, DERELICT VEHICLES1 SECTIONS: 7-8-1: LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS. 7-8-2: DEFINITIONS. 7-8-3: ABANDONMENT OF VEHICLE OR RETENTION OF DERELICT VEHICLE PROHIBITED. 7-8-4: PRESUMPTIONS. 7-8-5: REMOVAL OF VEHICLES; COSTS. 7-8-6: RECORDS OF TOWS. 7-8-7: RECORDS SEARCHES FOR OWNER. 7-8-8: RECLAMATION OF VEHICLE. 7-8-9: SALE OF VEHICLE. 7-8-10: OLDER VEHICLES. 7-8-11: ALTERNATE PROCEDURES. 7-8-12: RECORDS KEPT. 7-8-13: DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS. 7-8-14: NONLIABILITY OF VILLAGE OR TOWING SERVICE. 7-8-1: LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS: The village board members, in keeping with the policy of the Illinois general assembly, as found in section 5/4-301 of the Illinois vehicle code, finds and determines that: abandoned and derelict vehicles constitute a safety hazard and a public nuisance; are detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the general public by harboring disease, providing breeding places for vermin, inviting plundering, creating fire hazards and presenting physical dangers to children and others; produce scenic blights which degrade the environment and adversely affect land values and the proper maintenance and continuing development of the state of Illinois and all of its subdivisions; represent a resource out of place and an energy loss to the Illinois economy and require state and local governmental attention, in conjunction with any federal governmental attention, in order to assure the expeditious removal and recycling of these abandoned and derelict vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sale of Children and Illegal Adoption
    THE SALE OF CHILDREN AND ILLEGAL ADOPTION NIGEL CANTWELL THE SALE OF CHILDREN AND ILLEGAL ADOPTION COLOPHON © Terre des Hommes Netherlands, 2017 The sale of children and illegal adoption November 2017 Author: Nigel Cantwell Layout: Nettl Den Haag Cover photo: Terre des Hommes This publication has been made in assignment of Terre des Hommes in cooperation with Defence for Children-ECPAT The Netherlands. Terre des Hommes Netherlands Zoutmanstraat 42-44, 2518 GS Den Haag The Netherlands Tel: +31 (70) 3105000 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.tdh.nl Nigel Cantwell is an international consultant on child protection. He first became concerned about illegalities in intercountry adoption in the 1980s when he was working with Defence for Children International (DCI) and coordinating the inputs of the NGO Group on the Convention on the Rights of the Child into the drafting of that treaty. Since then, he has undertaken assessment missions on adoption systems in a wide range of countries and he has authored many articles on the protection of children’s rights in alternative care and adoption. Terre des Hommes Netherlands prevents child exploitation, removes children from exploitative situations and ensures children can develop in a safe environment. Terre des Hommes works towards a world where all children have a decent life and can grow up to be independent adults. A world in which children are no longer exploited. Terre des Hommes will continue its work until this is accomplished. 1 4.B.ii. Moratoria imposed by receiving countries 36 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.C. Current conditions for a “perfect storm” in intercountry adoption 39 4.C.i.
    [Show full text]
  • Highest Risk Abandoned, Lost and Discarded Fishing Gear
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Highest risk abandoned, lost and discarded fshing gear Eric Gilman1*, Michael Musyl2, Petri Suuronen3, Milani Chaloupka4, Saeid Gorgin5, Jono Wilson1,6 & Brandon Kuczenski6 Derelict abandoned, lost and discarded fshing gear have profound adverse efects. We assessed gear-specifc relative risks from derelict gear to rank-order fshing methods based on: derelict gear production rates, gear quantity indicators of catch weight and fshing grounds area, and adverse consequences from derelict gear. The latter accounted for ghost fshing, transfer of microplastics and toxins into food webs, spread of invasive alien species and harmful microalgae, habitat degradation, obstruction of navigation and in-use fshing gear, and coastal socioeconomic impacts. Globally, mitigating highest risk derelict gear from gillnet, tuna purse seine with fsh aggregating devices, and bottom trawl fsheries achieves maximum conservation gains. Locally, adopting controls following a sequential mitigation hierarchy and implementing efective monitoring, surveillance and enforcement systems are needed to curb derelict gear from these most problematic fsheries. Primary and synthesis research are priorities to improve future risk assessments, produce the frst robust estimate of global derelict gear quantity, and assess the performance of initiatives to manage derelict gear. Findings from this frst quantitative estimate of gear-specifc relative risks from derelict gear guide the allocation of resources to achieve the largest improvements from mitigating adverse efects of derelict gear from the world’s 4.6 million fshing vessels. Over the past decade there has been increasing international recognition of the need for multilateral eforts to address transboundary adverse ecological and socioeconomic efects of abandoned, lost and discarded fshing gear (ALDFG), also called derelict fshing gear 1, 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Form I-600, Petition to Classify Orphan As an Immediate Relative, to Determine Whether a Child Who Has Been Or Will Be Adopted by a U.S
    Instructions for Petition to Classify Orphan as an Immediate Relative USCIS Form I-600 Department of Homeland Security OMB No. 1615-0028 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Expires 12/31/2021 What Is the Purpose of Form I-600? U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) uses the information provided on Form I-600, Petition to Classify Orphan as an Immediate Relative, to determine whether a child who has been or will be adopted by a U.S. citizen (and spouse, if married) can be classified as an orphan for an immediate relative immigrant visa. Who May File Form I-600? If you are a U.S. citizen, you (and your spouse, if married) may file Form I-600 for an unmarried child if: 1. You file the Form I-600 before the child’s 16th birthday (or before the child’s 18th birthday in some cases, as discussed in these Instructions); 2. The child’s adoption is not governed by the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (Hague Adoption Convention); 3. The child qualifies as an orphan, as defined in the Immigration and NationalityAct (INA) section 101(b)(1)(F); and 4. You (and your spouse, if married) either: A. Have adopted the child outside the United States and the adoption order is final; or B. Have obtained legal custody of the child for emigration and adoption in the United States and will adopt the child in the United States after the child enters the country with a visa. To qualify as an adoption for immigration purposes, the adoption must, according to the laws where it takes place, establish a permanent legal parent-child relationship between the child and you (and your spouse, if married), as well as terminate the legal parent-child relationship between the child and any former parent(s).
    [Show full text]
  • LOST the Official Show Auction
    LOST | The Auction 156 1-310-859-7701 Profiles in History | August 21 & 22, 2010 572. JACK’S COSTUME FROM THE EPISODE, “THERE’S NO 574. JACK’S COSTUME FROM PLACE LIKE HOME, PARTS 2 THE EPISODE, “EGGTOWN.” & 3.” Jack’s distressed beige Jack’s black leather jack- linen shirt and brown pants et, gray check-pattern worn in the episode, “There’s long-sleeve shirt and blue No Place Like Home, Parts 2 jeans worn in the episode, & 3.” Seen on the raft when “Eggtown.” $200 – $300 the Oceanic Six are rescued. $200 – $300 573. JACK’S SUIT FROM THE EPISODE, “THERE’S NO PLACE 575. JACK’S SEASON FOUR LIKE HOME, PART 1.” Jack’s COSTUME. Jack’s gray pants, black suit (jacket and pants), striped blue button down shirt white dress shirt and black and gray sport jacket worn in tie from the episode, “There’s Season Four. $200 – $300 No Place Like Home, Part 1.” $200 – $300 157 www.liveauctioneers.com LOST | The Auction 578. KATE’S COSTUME FROM THE EPISODE, “THERE’S NO PLACE LIKE HOME, PART 1.” Kate’s jeans and green but- ton down shirt worn at the press conference in the episode, “There’s No Place Like Home, Part 1.” $200 – $300 576. JACK’S SEASON FOUR DOCTOR’S COSTUME. Jack’s white lab coat embroidered “J. Shephard M.D.,” Yves St. Laurent suit (jacket and pants), white striped shirt, gray tie, black shoes and belt. Includes medical stetho- scope and pair of knee reflex hammers used by Jack Shephard throughout the series.
    [Show full text]
  • NRT Abandoned Vessel Authorities and Best Practices Guidance 2020
    ABANDONED VESSEL AUTHORITIES AND BEST PRACTICES GUIDANCE 2020 UPDATE VERSION 10 This page intentionally left blank ii ABANDONED VESSEL AUTHORITIES AND BEST PRACTICES GUIDANCE Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... vi How to Use This Guidance ....................................................................................................................... vii Section 1.0 Definition of Terms .................................................................................................................. 1 Section 2.0 Background and Purpose ........................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Considerations and Assumptions ..................................................................................................... 6 Section 3.0 Initial Assessment .................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Infant Safe Haven Laws a Safe Haven
    STATE STATUTES Current Through December 2016 WHAT’S INSIDE Who may leave a baby at Infant Safe Haven Laws a safe haven Many State legislatures have enacted legislation to Safe haven providers address infant abandonment and endangerment in Responsibilities of safe response to a reported increase in the abandonment haven providers of infants in unsafe locations, such as public restrooms or trash receptacles. Beginning in Texas Immunity for providers in 1999, “Baby Moses laws” or infant safe haven laws have been enacted as an incentive for mothers in Protections for parents crisis to safely relinquish their babies to designated Consequences of locations where the babies are protected and relinquishment provided with medical care until a permanent home is found. Safe haven laws generally allow the parent, Summaries of State laws or an agent of the parent, to remain anonymous and to be shielded from criminal liability and prosecution for child endangerment, abandonment, or neglect in To find statute exchange for surrendering the baby to a safe haven. information for a particular State, go to https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ laws-policies/state/. Children’s Bureau/ACYF/ACF/HHS 800.394.3366 | Email: [email protected] | https://www.childwelfare.gov Infant Safe Haven Laws https://www.childwelfare.gov To date, all 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Safe Haven Providers Rico have enacted safe haven legislation.1 The focus of these laws is protecting newborns from endangerment by The purpose of safe haven laws is to ensure that providing parents an alternative to criminal abandonment, relinquished infants are left with persons who can provide and therefore the laws are generally limited to very the immediate care needed for their safety and well- young children.
    [Show full text]