The Transnational Illegal Adoption Market

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Transnational Illegal Adoption Market The transnational illegal adoption market Citation for published version (APA): Loibl, E. C. (2019). The transnational illegal adoption market: A criminological study of the German and Dutch intercountry adoption systems. Eleven International publishing. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20190515el Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2019 DOI: 10.26481/dis.20190515el Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement: www.umlib.nl/taverne-license Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at: [email protected] providing details and we will investigate your claim. Download date: 25 Sep. 2021 The Transnational Illegal Adoption Market The_Transnational_Illegal_Adoption_Market_voorwerk.indd 1 08/02/2019 08:58:42 The_Transnational_Illegal_Adoption_Market_voorwerk.indd 2 08/02/2019 08:58:42 The Transnational Illegal Adoption Market A Criminological Study of the German and Dutch Intercountry Adoption Systems DISSERTATION to obtain the degree of Doctor at Maastricht University, on the authority of the Rector Magnificus, prof.dr. Rianne M. Letschert, in accordance with the decision of the Board of Deans, to be defended in public on Wednesday 15 May 2019, at 10.00 hours by Elvira Carolin Loibl The_Transnational_Illegal_Adoption_Market_voorwerk.indd 3 08/02/2019 08:58:42 Supervisors: Prof.dr. A.H. Klip Prof.dr. S.W.E. Rutten Prof.dr. E. Wesseling Assessment Committee: Prof.dr. L. Briggs (University of Massachusetts Amherst) Prof.dr. G.R. de Groot Prof.dr. J.M. Nelen (Chair) Prof.dr. M. Pertegás Sender Prof.dr. D.M. Smolin (Samford University) The_Transnational_Illegal_Adoption_Market_voorwerk.indd 4 08/02/2019 08:58:42 This book is dedicated to my parents, Martha and Werner, and to all birth, adoptive and foster parents, who do the best they can for their children. Preface The cover of this book features King Solomon of Israel who rules between two women both claiming to be the mother of an infant son. 1 Kings 3:16-28 recounts that two women living in the same house, each the mother of a baby boy, came to Solomon. The child belonging to one woman had smothered, and its mother had exchanged it for the living one, putting her own dead child in the other woman’s bed as she laid sleeping, and taking the living child to herself. In the morning, the mother of the living child had discovered that the child was not hers, but the woman whose child was dead would not give up the one that she had stolen. The two women stood before the king, each one claiming that the living child was hers, and that the dead child belonged to the other. Solomon called for a sword and declared his judgment: “Cut the living child in two and give half to one and half to the other”. One mother did not contest the ruling, declaring that if she could not have the baby then neither of them should, but the other begged Solomon, “Give the baby to her, just don’t kill him!” The king declared the second woman the true mother, as a mother would even give up her baby if that was necessary to save its life. How is the story of King Solomon’s judgment relevant for the intercountry adoption system? Just like the woman’s vulnerable state was taken advantage of (being asleep meant that she was unable to protect her child), the extreme powerlessness of numerous birth parents that face poverty and/or discrimination is often being exploited. As several reports have shown, not only children that were given up freely by their parents enter the adoption system, but also children who have been purchased, kidnapped or abducted from their vulnerable families. Also the stealing mother’s role does share some parallels with the role of adoptive parents: Just like the woman in the story, many adopters are driven by the desperate desire to have a child of their own. And although they would not kidnap anybody else’s baby, some might at least facilitate the illegal removal of a child by ignoring the sig- nificance of their money in the adoption system and by turning a blind eye to signs of irregular practices by other stakeholders involved in adoptions. The judgment of Solomon is often referred to as an example of profound wisdom. The king’s verdict has revealed the truth and solved the dispute between the two women in the best interests of the child. In the current intercountry adoption system, such a Solomonic judgement is difficult to render. The different stakeholders involved in international adoptions have to face a myriad of complex questions and dilemmas: Who should care for the numerous children worldwide who have to live and work on the streets? Would it be in the best interests of the child to be placed for adoption if he or she has birth parents that want to keep their child but do not have the financial means to provide proper care? What do `the best interests of the child’ and `proper care’ mean in the first place? Would vii Preface it be right to interpret these terms according to Western standards or would it ultimately lead to an imperialist, neo-colonial outcome? What should happen to children who live in child care institutions? Should a child’s right to identity preservation trump the possi- bility to be placed into a loving adoptive family abroad? Is it legitimate for a Western adoption agency or adopters to donate money or goods to the birth family or the orphanage to help care for the rest of the children, or would it constitute payment for a child? What should a judge decide when it turns out that a child, who has lived with his or her new adoptive family for already quite some time, had actually been obtained illegally from the birth parents? Would it be right to leave the child with the adoptive family or to send him or her back to the country of origin in order to be reunited with the birth family? The present book sheds light on these questions and unearths the factors in the intercountry adoption system which impede a wise judgement by the different stakeholders involved that actually serve the best interest of the children. viii Table of Contents Acknowledgements xvii I Introduction 1 1 Central Focus and Scope 1 2 Methodological Framework 8 2.1 Interdisciplinary Approach 8 2.2 Comparative Approach 9 2.3 Case Study Approach 12 2.4 Data Sources and Analysis 13 2.4.1 Legal sources 13 2.4.2 Policy, academic and media sources 14 2.4.3 Semi-structured interviews 15 2.4.4 Adopters’ autobiographic stories 18 2.5 Ethical Considerations 19 3 Structure of the Book 20 4 Terminology 22 II Child Trafficking for Adoption Purposes – A Criminological Analysis of the Illegal Adoption Market 25 1 Introduction 25 2 The Structural Components of the Transnational Illegal Adoption Market 27 2.1 The Basic Logic of Routine Activity Theory 27 2.2 Demand Component 28 2.2.1 From a humanitarian deed to a remedy for involun- tary childlessness 28 2.2.2 The role of adoption agencies 32 2.3 Supply Component 33 2.3.1 Source countries 33 2.3.2 Illegal practices to secure adoptable children 38 2.4 Social Control Component 41 2.4.1 Child laundering – connecting demand and illegal supply 41 2.4.2 Adoption agencies’ representatives and cooperation partners in the sending countries 45 ix Table of Contents 2.5 Criminogenic Asymmetries between Demand and Source Countries 47 2.6 Displacements Effects of Supply Reduction and ‘Cycles of Abuse’ 50 3 The International Legal Framework on Child Trafficking 52 4 The Prism of Child Trafficking for Adoption Purposes 59 4.1 The Crime Prism 59 4.2 The Prismatic Analysis of Child Trafficking for Adoption Purposes 61 4.2.1 Individual and social harm 62 4.2.2 Invisibility 65 4.2.3 Extent of victimization 69 4.2.4 Lack of public agreement on seriousness 70 4.2.5 Low probability of severe social response 75 5 Conclusion and Discussion 76 III The Rights of the Child and the ‘Best Interests’ Principle in Intercountry Adoption 81 1 Introduction 81 2 Positions on the Legitimacy of Intercountry Adoption 82 2.1 Abolitionists 83 2.2 Promoters 86 2.3 Regulationists 87 3 Background and Development of the UNCRC 89 4 Family and the Rights of the Child 90 4.1 The Definition of
Recommended publications
  • Child Laundering: How the Intercountry Adoption System Legitimizes and Incentivizes the Practices of Buying, Trafficking, Kidnaping, and Stealing Children
    CHILD LAUNDERING: HOW THE INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION SYSTEM LEGITIMIZES AND INCENTIVIZES THE PRACTICES OF BUYING, TRAFFICKING, KIDNAPING, AND STEALING CHILDREN DAVID M. SMOLIN† Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ...................................... 115 II. THE INCIDENCE OF CHILD BUYING, STEALING, KIDNAPING, AND TRAFFICKING WITHIN THE INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION SYSTEM ... 117 A. Methods of Operation ............................. 117 1. Child Buying Scenario I ......................... 118 2. Child Buying Scenario II ........................ 119 3. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Scenario I: Kidnaping Children Placed into Orphanages, Hostels, or Schools for Purposes of Education or Care ................... 119 4. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Scenario II: Obtaining Children Through False Pretenses ........................ 121 5. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Children Scenario III: Lost Children ................................... 121 6. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Scenario IV: Traditional Kidnaping .................................. 122 7. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Scenario V: Intra-Familial Kidnaping .................................. 123 8. Child Stealing/Kidnaping Scenario VI: “Your Money or Your Baby:” Taking Children in Payment of a Debt .... 124 B. Extreme Poverty and Sending Nations .................. 124 C. Cycles of Abuse .................................. 132 D. Stories of Abuse: Tracking Child Laundering Within Various Sending Nations ................................. 135 1. Cambodia ................................... 135 2. India .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Cold War: Russia's Ban on Adoptions by U.S. Citizens
    \\jciprod01\productn\M\MAT\28-1\MAT110.txt unknown Seq: 1 16-OCT-15 15:11 Vol. 28, 2015 Russia’s Ban on Adoptions by U.S. Citizens 51 The New Cold War: Russia’s Ban on Adoptions by U.S. Citizens by Cynthia Hawkins DeBose* and Ekaterina DeAngelo** Table of Contents I. Introduction ....................................... 52 R II. Historical Background of American and Russian Intercountry Adoption ............................. 54 R A. Development of Intercountry Adoption in the United States .................................. 54 R B. Development of Intercountry Adoption Between Russia and the United States ........ 56 R III. Russian Intercountry Adoption Laws .............. 58 R A. Laws Governing Intercountry Adoptions in Russia ......................................... 58 R B. Recent Changes to the Laws Governing American Adoptions of Russian Orphans ..... 61 R 1. The United States–Russia Adoption Agreement................................. 61 R 2. The Russian Law Banning American Adoptions and Controversy over the Ban . 63 R a. The American Adoption Ban and Its Effect on Intercountry Adoption of Russian Orphans ...................... 63 R b. Arguments in Support of and in Opposition to the American Adoption Ban in Russia .......................... 65 R * Professor of Law, Stetson University College of Law (SUCOL). B.A. Wellesley College; J.D. Harvard Law School. Thank you to Alicia Tarrant (SUCOL, 2016) for her invaluable research assistance and Roman Faizorin (SUCOL, 2018) for his Russian to English translation of Russian source materi- als. This project was supported by a SUCOL Faculty Research Grant. ** Assistant Attorney General of Texas, Environmental Protection Divi- sion. Ufa Law Institute of the Interior Ministry of Russian Federation, 2007; J.D. Stetson University College of Law, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Understanding the Nature of Institutionalization for Children in Russia STEPANOVA, EVGENIA How to cite: STEPANOVA, EVGENIA (2014) Understanding the Nature of Institutionalization for Children in Russia, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10641/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Understanding the Nature of Institutionalization for Children in Russia Evgenia Stepanova PhD This Thesis is submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, School of Applied Social Sciences, Durham University May 2014 ABSTRACT There is an ongoing debate in contemporary international literature about how state care provision is ‘failing’ children and young people in care. In Russia, institutional care is the most widespread with this type of child care placement representing 98 per cent of all out-of- home care facilities for children after kinship care (Groark et al., 2008; Human Rights Watch, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • When Abortion Is Banned the Politics of Reproduction in Ceaucescu's
    THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H : When Abortion is Banned: TITLE The Politics of Reproduction in Ceausescu's Romania, and After AUTHOR: Gail Kligman CONTRACTOR : University of California, Berkeley PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Gail Kligman COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 805-1 4 DATE : May 26, 199 2 The work leading to this report was supported by contract funds provided by the National Council for Soviet an d East European Research . The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded by Council Contract . The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within the Council and U.S. Government for their own use , and to draw upon such reports and materials for their own studies ; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, or make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U .S. Government without the written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom o f Information Act 5 U.S. C. 552, or other applicable law. Table of Contents Executive Summary i I . Gender Equality, "Homogenization" and the New Socialist Person 3 II . Political Demography 8 A. The Pronatalist Policies 8 B. Policing the Body 1 8 III . The Politics of Reproduction in Post-Ceausescu Romania 29 A. Liberating Bodies : Abortion, AIDS, International Adoption 32 B. Protecting Citizens' Rights 42 C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sale of Children and Illegal Adoption
    THE SALE OF CHILDREN AND ILLEGAL ADOPTION NIGEL CANTWELL THE SALE OF CHILDREN AND ILLEGAL ADOPTION COLOPHON © Terre des Hommes Netherlands, 2017 The sale of children and illegal adoption November 2017 Author: Nigel Cantwell Layout: Nettl Den Haag Cover photo: Terre des Hommes This publication has been made in assignment of Terre des Hommes in cooperation with Defence for Children-ECPAT The Netherlands. Terre des Hommes Netherlands Zoutmanstraat 42-44, 2518 GS Den Haag The Netherlands Tel: +31 (70) 3105000 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.tdh.nl Nigel Cantwell is an international consultant on child protection. He first became concerned about illegalities in intercountry adoption in the 1980s when he was working with Defence for Children International (DCI) and coordinating the inputs of the NGO Group on the Convention on the Rights of the Child into the drafting of that treaty. Since then, he has undertaken assessment missions on adoption systems in a wide range of countries and he has authored many articles on the protection of children’s rights in alternative care and adoption. Terre des Hommes Netherlands prevents child exploitation, removes children from exploitative situations and ensures children can develop in a safe environment. Terre des Hommes works towards a world where all children have a decent life and can grow up to be independent adults. A world in which children are no longer exploited. Terre des Hommes will continue its work until this is accomplished. 1 4.B.ii. Moratoria imposed by receiving countries 36 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.C. Current conditions for a “perfect storm” in intercountry adoption 39 4.C.i.
    [Show full text]
  • The ECHR and Private Intercountry Adoptions in Germany and the Netherlands: Lessons Learned from Campanelli and Paradiso V
    This article from Family & Law is published by Boom juridisch and made available to anonieme bezoeker The ECHR and Private Intercountry Adoptions in Germany and the Netherlands: Lessons Learned from Campanelli and Paradiso v. Italy ARTICLE The ECHR and Private Intercountry Adoptions in Germany and the Netherlands: Lessons Learned from Campanelli and Paradiso v. Italy E.C. Loibl* 1. Introduction Within the past couple of years, numerous reports about abusive practices within the intercountry adoption system emerged. Children were purchased from their impoverished families, or abducted from their homes, the streets, or orphanages.1 Vulnerable birth parents were coerced or deceived in order to obtain their consent for an adoption.2 Birth certificates and other documents that are necessary for an adoption were falsified or fabricated to hide the children’s origin.3 Government officials or judges in the sending countries were being bribed to approve a fraudu- lent intercountry adoption.4 The intercountry adoption system has an intrinsically criminogenic character: the great imbalance between the demand for and the sup- ply of adoptable babies, combined with the large sums of Western money, incite greedy actors in poor countries to illegally obtain children for adoption and tempt even humanitarian organizations into abusive conduct.5 This renders intercountry adoption conducive to abuses. Private intercountry adoptions, meaning adoptions that adopters pursue without the involvement of an accredited adoption agency and the authorities in the receiv- ing country, are particularly prone to abuses.6 This is why the 1993 Hague Conven- tion on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adop- tion (‘Hague Convention’), which was adopted with the aim to tackle illegal and commercial practices within the intercountry adoption system,7 prohibits them * Elvira Loibl is Assistant Professor Criminal Law and Criminology, Universiteit Maastricht.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chico Historian
    The Chico Historian California State University, Chico: Department of History The Chico Historian Editor Christopher Lasley Editorial Board Kevin Dewey Katie Fox Kayla Hudson Advising Faculty Dr. Stephen Lewis- The Chico Historian Dr. Jason Nice & Dr. Jessica Clark- Phi Alpha Theta: The History Honor Society 1 The Chico Historian This volume is dedicated to Dr. Lawrence Bryant 2 The Chico Historian Letter From the Editor It is my profound pleasure to edit and introduce the 2010-2011 edition of The Chico Historian. This volume represents the collaborative efforts between students and CSU, Chico’s dedicated faculty. The papers presented here are a small sampling of the student work done at Chico, but they highlight the diversity and the value of historical inquiry. For many of the authors in this volume seeing their work published is a new experience, while others are a familiar name to this journal. In either case, their work is appreciated and it is both my honor and that of this year’s editorial board, to highlight their writing. This volume was made possible through the continued enthusiasm and support for student work on the behalf of the entire history department. I would also like to specifically thank Dr. Stephen Lewis for his advice and support throughout this process. Dr. Laird Easton for his dedication to The Chico Historian. Dr. Jason Nice and Dr. Jessica Clark for their constant support to students. Professor John Boyle for his continuing support. Claudia Beaty for the million little things she has done to assist this journal. Finally, I would like to thank my editorial board for their hard work throughout this semester.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Best Interests of the Children: Why the Hague Convention Of
    Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 29 | Issue 2 Article 7 5-1-2006 For the Best Interests of the Children: Why the Hague Convention of Intercountry Adoption Needs to Go Farther, as Evidenced by Implementation in Romania and the United States Elisabeth J. Ryan Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr Part of the Family Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Elisabeth J. Ryan, For the Best Interests of the Children: Why the Hague Convention of Intercountry Adoption Needs to Go Farther, as Evidenced by Implementation in Romania and the United States , 29 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 353 (2006), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol29/iss2/7 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FOR THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILDREN: WHY THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION NEEDS TO GO FARTHER, AS EVIDENCED BY IMPLEMENTATION IN ROMANIA AND THE UNITED STATES Elisabeth J. Ryan* Abstract: International adoption is a common occurrence in today’s so- ciety. In order to address the dangers linked with international adoption such as baby trafªcking, the members of the Hague Conference on Pri- vate International Law produced the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption in 1993, setting forth a minimum base of standards that every ratifying government must abide by, placing the best interests of the child above all other considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Adoption Policy the European Union and International
    Center for Adoption Policy The European Union and International Adoption Maarten Pereboom, Salisbury University Adoption – legally taking an individual born to others as one’s own child – dates back to ancient times, though the practice has changed significantly over time and is not common to all cultures. In recent times adoption has become an international phenomenon that tests both precepts about universal human rights and the interface of different legal customs and systems. In Europe, where traditions also vary from country to country, intercountry adoption has become entangled in the complicated process by which countries accede to the European Union, the supranational organization of states forming the world’s largest single market. While Europe explicitly proclaims the rights of children among its extensive list of human rights, the welfare of abandoned children remains caught between the imperatives of, on the one hand, helping as many children as possible, and, on the other, ensuring that best practices are followed, protecting the child and respecting the laws of all states involved – making the process lengthy, cumbersome and expensive. In 2004, under pressure from the European Union to which it hopes to accede in 2007, Romania banned adoption by foreigners of Romanian children. The law, which took effect in 2005, aimed to crack down on the corruption that existed in a highly flawed system, but in doing so it consigned thousands of children to years of institutional life. For families hoping to adopt one or more of these children, the situation reveals a terrible void between European human rights declarations and enforceable national laws that actually ensure the welfare of children.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral and Neural Effects of Reasoning Training by Allyson Mackey Doctor of Philosophy in Neuroscience University of California, Berkeley
    Behavioral and Neural Effects of Reasoning Training by Allyson Mackey A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Neuroscience in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee: Professor Silvia A. Bunge, Ph.D. (Chair) Professor Robert T. Knight, M.D. Professor Sonia J. Bishop, Ph.D. Professor Susan I. Stone, Ph.D. Fall 2012 Abstract Behavioral and Neural Effects of Reasoning Training by Allyson Mackey Doctor of Philosophy in Neuroscience University of California, Berkeley Professor Silvia A. Bunge, Ph.D., Chair My thesis research has focused broadly on how the environment shapes the structure and function of prefrontal cortex, for better or worse. I am interested in understanding in how experience-dependent plasticity can be harnessed to boost, or in some cases, remediate prefrontal function. I focused on training reasoning, the ability to solve novel problems, for two reasons: 1) reasoning is highly predictive of academic outcomes, and 2) reasoning was originally conceptualized as a fixed trait, and many people, both in science and in the general public, still believe that reasoning is set in stone. I conducted two studies, one in children and one in adults, to test the predictions that reasoning ability is malleable, and that repeated practice with reasoning problems strengthens connectivity within the frontoparietal network that supports high-level cognition. In my first study, children from low socioeconomic status backgrounds participated in 8 weeks of training with computerized and non-computerized games that targeted either reasoning ability or cognitive speed. Training led to dissociable behavioral outcomes: children in the reasoning training group improved substantially on a matrix reasoning test, while children in the speed training group improved specifically on a measure of cognitive speed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ius Gentium Conimbrigae/Human Rights Centre) European Master´S Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation A.Y
    UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA (PORTUGAL) (Ius Gentium Conimbrigae/Human Rights Centre) European Master´s Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation A.Y. 2013/2014 “THE CASES OF `STOLEN CHILDREN´ IN SPAIN AND IRELAND: Curtailing the most suitable legal framework on the fight for `real´ identities” Author: Marta Trenado Díaz Supervisors: Professor Jónatas Machado and Carla Marcelino Gomes “Truth never damages a cause that is just.” ― Mahatma Gandhi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To all those mothers and `stolen children´ who gave me the opportunity to join to the fight for their cause, who welcomed me with open arms, offering me their help and showing me their indefatigable efforts to achieve general public awareness and accountability. To Carla Marcelino Gomes, who trained me in my first attempt to write this thesis and encouraged me and support me in every decision I took. A special word of thanks to the E.ma Master who provided me the chance to meet such amazing people, who shared with me these months of long- nights without sleeping, and who were always there for me, offering kind words, a huge smile and a warm hug . Especially to `la famiglia´ for the love and happiness they brought to my life since I met them in this Master. My special thanks to my parents and family, who gave me the opportunity to be where I am, to study what I always wished to and for their blindly trust in me; specially to my mother Inés M., who gave me the enough confidence to go through all the moments I felt overwhelmed and took care of me showing me the light at the end of the tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption and Child Trafficking: Structural Violence in the International Adoption System
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 2014 Adoption and Child Trafficking: Structural Violence in the International Adoption System Vanessa Virgiel Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Virgiel, Vanessa, "Adoption and Child Trafficking: Structural Violence in the International Adoption System" (2014). University Honors Theses. Paper 114. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.116 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Adoption and Child Trafficking: Structural Violence in the International Adoption System by Vanessa Virgiel An undergraduate honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in University Honors and Applied Linguistics, Arts & Letters, and Liberal Studies Thesis Adviser Dr. Kimberley Brown Portland State University 2014 i Adoption and Child Trafficking: Structural Violence in the International Adoption System © 2014 Vanessa Virgiel ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Firstly, I must thank my thesis adviser, Dr. Kim Brown of the Applied Linguistics department. She has been a mentor to me ever since I enrolled at Portland State, and her unceasing guidance and support since then has helped shaped the trajectory of my academic career in ways I never anticipated when I first returned to school. I owe thanks to Dr. Ann Marie Fallon and Nora Quiros of the Honors College; their flexibility and patience through this process allowed me to change course and pursue a topic of research I was passionate about.
    [Show full text]