Daisyworld Modeling and Feedback Mechanisms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Daisyworld Modeling and Feedback Mechanisms Daisyworld modeling and feedback mechanisms By Mark Wittwer Environmental Engineering Project (640.476) - 1 - Abstract Watson and Lovelock first offered Daisyworld in 1983 as a response to critics that were skeptical about ‘Gaia.’ This was a theory explaining the Earth system as a single physiological being (Lovelock, 2000) where life can exert influence on the earth’s climate similarly to how climate influences life. Daisyworld was presented as a computer model where an Earth-like planet with good growth conditions was home to two organisms; black and white daisies. The model was kept simple, with no atmosphere or oceans to illustrate the daisies’ role in temperature feedback. Throughout the life of Daisyworld, solar radiation slowly increases to replicate the Sun’s influence on planet Earth. During the slow warming trend of Daisyworld, daisies begin to grow. With a low albedo, black daisies are favoured initially due to their ability to increase the local temperature. They continue to grow and cause a positive feedback to the planet’s average temperature, making it higher than if there were no daisies. Throughout time, Daisyworld becomes warmer and the two organisms compete for space and eventually the white daisies are favoured due to their positive temperature feedback and cooler local temperature, keeping Daisyworld from becoming too hot. Later, the Sun’s increasing radiation means that the planet becomes intolerably hot for life and Daisyworld dies. The original Daisyworld gave credit to the Gaia hypothesis by showing that life could maintain a prolonged temperature comfort zone despite the constantly rising insolation. In this thesis, the simple Daisyworld model was constructed, tested and later modified and extended further to include various other feedbacks that occur in the Earth’s climate system. Firstly, insolation was adjusted according to latitude and the model showed strong dependence on the heat transfer of the planet. With no atmosphere or oceans present, latitudinal heat transfer had to be approximated which yielded results that would mimic a “daisy-Earth.” Later in the model, ice albedo, water vapour and carbon dioxide feedbacks were added. Although the feedbacks coexist and conflict in the Earth’s system, the Daisyworld model and the investigations made in this project demonstrate the strength of the individual feedbacks. Evidently, these are important to maintaining stable climate in which life can exist. There were some major problems that occurred in the project. The original Daisyworld was created simple and its purpose was to highlight the albedo feedback to temperature. Adding complexity to the model proved interesting but attempting to replicate the earth’s heat - 2 - transfer and feedbacks was very difficult. This was because the earth’s climate equations did not apply to Daisyworld and approximations had to be made. Resultantly, the model only offered limited success in demonstrating the role of feedback mechanisms. - 3 - Contents Contents................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................7 Literature Review..................................................................................................................8 1. Daisyworld................................................................................................................8 1.1. Energy balance ..................................................................................................9 1.2. Daisyworld model............................................................................................11 1.3. Existing modifications made to Daisyworld.....................................................13 1.4. Limitations to Daisyworld................................................................................15 2. Feedback mechanisms .............................................................................................16 2.1. Ice albedo feedback .........................................................................................17 2.2. Water vapour feedback ....................................................................................17 2.3. Carbon dioxide feedback .................................................................................18 Aims ...................................................................................................................................20 Methods..............................................................................................................................22 1. Assumptions............................................................................................................22 1.1. Daisyworld ......................................................................................................22 1.2. Replicating the existing modifications to Daisyworld.......................................23 1.3. Latitudinal variation addition to Daisyworld ....................................................24 1.4. Ice albedo addition to Daisyworld....................................................................26 1.5. Water vapour addition to Daisyworld...............................................................27 1.6. Carbon dioxide addition to Daisyworld............................................................28 2. Calculations.............................................................................................................29 2.1. Common base method......................................................................................29 2.2. Original Daisyworld creation...........................................................................31 2.3. Addition of existing modifications...................................................................32 2.4. Addition of latitudinal variation .......................................................................34 2.5. Addition of ice albedo feedback.......................................................................36 2.6. Addition of water vapour feedback ..................................................................36 2.7. Addition of carbon dioxide feedback................................................................38 Results ................................................................................................................................40 1. Initial model attempt results.....................................................................................40 2. Final model results ..................................................................................................43 2.1. Original Daisyworld ........................................................................................43 2.2. Existing modifications to Daisyworld ..............................................................45 2.3. Daisyworld with added latitudinal variation.....................................................48 2.4. Daisyworld with ice albedo feedback...............................................................50 2.5. Daisyworld with water vapour feedback ..........................................................52 2.6. Daisyworld with carbon dioxide feedback........................................................55 3. Sensitivities of the model parameters.......................................................................57 3.1. Iterations..........................................................................................................57 3.2. Albedo (α) .......................................................................................................59 3.3. Growth limits...................................................................................................61 3.4. Death rate ........................................................................................................63 3.5. Horizontal heat flux (q)....................................................................................63 3.6. Number of daisies (one or two)........................................................................64 4. Testing the system’s response to change..................................................................64 Discussion and analysis.......................................................................................................67 1. Original Daisyworld ................................................................................................67 2. Existing modifications.............................................................................................67 2.1. Addition of ‘cheats’ .........................................................................................68 2.2. Addition of predators and plagues....................................................................70 - 4 - 3. Addition of latitudinal variation...............................................................................71 4. Addition of ice albedo feedback...............................................................................72 5. Addition of water vapour feedback..........................................................................73 6. Addition of carbon dioxide feedback .......................................................................75 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................77 References ..........................................................................................................................81
Recommended publications
  • Climate Modelling Primer
    A Climate Modelling Primer A Climate Modelling Primer, Third Edition. K. McGuffie and A. Henderson-Sellers. © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd ISBN: 0-470-85750-1 (HB); 0-470-85751-X (PB) A Climate Modelling Primer THIRD EDITION Kendal McGuffie University of Technology, Sydney, Australia and Ann Henderson-Sellers ANSTO Environment, Australia Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England Telephone (+44) 1243 779777 Email (for orders and customer service enquiries): [email protected] Visit our Home Page on www.wileyeurope.com or www.wiley.com All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP, UK, without the permission in writing of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England, or emailed to [email protected], or faxed to (+44) 1243 770620. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The Publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prophet of Climate Change James Lovelock Rolling Stone
    The Prophet of Climate Change: James Lovelock : Rolling Stone 4/14/10 6:53 AM Advertisement PRINTER FRIENDLY URL: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/16956300/the_prophet_of_climate_change_james_lovelock Rollingstone.com Back to The Prophet of Climate Change: James Lovelock The Prophet of Climate Change: James Lovelock One of the most eminent scientists of our time says that global warming is irreversible — and that more than 6 billion people will perish by the end of the century JEFF GOODELL Posted Nov 01, 2007 2:20 PM ADVERTISEMENT At the age of eighty-eight, after four children and a long and respected career as one of the twentieth century's most influential scientists, James Lovelock has come to an unsettling conclusion: The human race is doomed. "I wish I could be more hopeful," he tells me one sunny morning as we walk through a park in Oslo, where he is giving a talk at a university. Lovelock is a small man, unfailingly polite, with white hair and round, owlish glasses. His step is jaunty, his mind lively, his manner anything but gloomy. In fact, the coming of the Four Horsemen -- war, famine, pestilence and death -- seems to perk him up. "It will be a dark time," Lovelock admits. "But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting." In Lovelock's view, the scale of the catastrophe that awaits us will soon become obvious. By 2020, droughts and other extreme weather will be commonplace. By 2040, the Sahara will be moving into Europe, and Berlin will be as hot as Baghdad.
    [Show full text]
  • Axel Bronstert 2005.Pdf
    I Axel Bronstert Jesus Carrera Pavel Kabat Sabine Lütkemeier Coupled Models for the Hydrological Cycle Integrating Atmosphere, Biosphere, and Pedosphere III Axel Bronstert Jesus Carrera Pavel Kabat Sabine Lütkemeier (Editors) Coupled Models for the Hydrological Cycle Integrating Atmosphere, Biosphere, and Pedosphere With 92 Figures, 19 in colour and 20 Tables IV Preface Axel Bronstert Pavel Kabat University of Potsdam Wageningen University and Institute for Geoecology Research Centre Chair for Hydrology and Climatology ALTERRA Green World Research P.O. Box 60 15 53 Droevendaalsesteeg 3 14415 Potsdam 6708 PB Wageningen Germany The Netherlands Jesus Carrera Sabine Lütkemeier Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) Potsdam Institute for Department of Geotechnical Engineering Climate Impact Research and Geosciences Telegrafenberg School of Civil Engineering 14473 Potsdam Campus Nord, Edif. D-2 Germany 08034 Barcelona Spain Library of Congress Control Number: 2004108318 ISBN 3-540-22371-1 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. Springer is a part of Springer Science+Business Media springeronline.com © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamic Response of the Global Atmosphere-Vegetation Coupled System
    THE UNIVERSITY OF READING Department of Meteorology The Dynamic Response of the Global Atmosphere-Vegetation coupled system John K. Hughes A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2003 ’Declaration I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged’ John Hughes The Dynamic Response of the Atmosphere-Vegetation coupled system Abstract Concern about future changes in the carbon cycle have highlighted the importance of a dy- namic representation of the carbon cycle in models, yet this has not been fully assessed. In this thesis, we investigate the dynamic carbon cycle model included within the Hadley Centre’s model. In order to understand the behaviour of the vegetation model a simplified model, describing the behaviour of a single plant functional type is derived. The ability of the simplified model to simulate vegetation dynamics is validated against the behaviour of the full complexity model. The dynamical properties of the simplified model are then investigated. To further investigate the dynamic response of vegetation, a 300 year climate model simulation of terrestrial vegetation re-growth from global desert has been performed. Vegetation is shown to introduce large time lags in land surface properties. This large memory in the terrestrial carbon cycle is an important result for GCM simulations. The large timescale also affects the response of existing vegetation to climatic forcings. The behaviour of the land surface in terms of source-sink transitions of atmospheric CO2 is discussed. It is found that the transitions between source and sink of CO2 are dependant on the vegetation timescales.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaos Theory and Its Application in the Atmosphere
    Chaos Theory and its Application in the Atmosphere by XubinZeng Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Roger A. Pielke, P.I. NSF Grant #ATM-8915265 CHAOS THEORY AND ITS APPLICATION IN THE ATMOSPHERE Xubin Zeng Department of Atmospheric Science CoJorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer, 1992 Atmospheric Science Paper No. 504 \llIlll~lIl1ll~I""I1~II~'I\1 U16400 7029194 ABSTRACT CHAOS THEORY AND ITS APPLICATION IN THE ATMOSPHERE Chaos theory is thoroughly reviewed, which includes the bifurcation and routes to tur­ bulence, and the characterization of chaos such as dimension, Lyapunov exponent, and Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy. A new method is developed to compute Lyapunov exponents from limited experimental data. Our method is tested on a variety of known model systems, and it is found that our algorithm can be used to obtain a reasonable Lyapunov­ exponent spectrum from only 5000 data points with a precision of 10-1 or 10-2 in 3- or 4-dimensional phase space, or 10,000 data points in 5-dimensional phase space. On 1:he basis of both the objective analyses of different methods for computing the Lyapunov exponents and our own experience, which is subjective, this is recommended as a good practical method for estiIpating the Lyapunov-exponent spectrum from short time series of low precision. The application of chaos is divided into three categories: observational data analysis, llew ideas or physical insights inspired by chaos, and numerical model output analysis. Corresponding with these categories, three subjects are studied. First, the fractal dimen­ sion, Lyapunov-exponent spectrum, Kolmogorov entropy, and predictability are evaluated from the observed time series of daily surface temperature and pressure over several regions of the United States and the North Atlantic Ocean with different climatic signal-to-noise ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Competition Affects Temperature Stability in Daisyworld
    T ellus (2000), 52B, 980–984 Copyright © Munksgaard, 2000 Printed in UK. All rights reserved TELLUS ISSN 0280–6509 Interspecific competition affects temperature stability in Daisyworld By JOEL E. COHEN1* and ALBERT D. RICH2, 1Rockefeller University and Columbia University, 1230 York Avenue, Box 20, New York, NY 10021-6399, USA; 2Rockefeller University, New York, and Soft Warehouse, Honolulu, USA (Manuscript received 12 February 1999; in final form 11 October 1999) ABSTRACT The model of Daisyworld showed that nonteleological mechanistic responses of life to the physical environment can stabilize an exogenously perturbed environment. In the model, 2 species of daisies, black and white, stabilize the global temperature of a planet exposed to different levels of insolation. In both species, the response of the growth rate to local temperature is identical, but differences in albedo between the 2 species generate differences in local temper- atures. The shifting balance between the daisies keeps the global temperature in a range suitable for life. Watson and Lovelock made the stronger claim that ‘‘the model always shows greater stability with daisies than it does without them.’’ We examined this claim by introducing an extra source of competition into the equations that describe the interactions between the daisy species. Depending on the parameters of competition, temperatures can vary more widely with increasing insolation in the presence of daisies than without them. It now seems possible, timely and perhaps necessary, to include an accurate representation of interspecific competition when taking account of vegetational influences on climate. 1. Introduction suitability of Earth for life (Lovelock, 1988; Lenton, 1998). To demonstrate that planetary It has long been recognized that life influences ‘‘homeostasis by and for the biosphere’’ could in physical and chemical environments and vice principle work by mechanisms that entailed no versa, at all scales from the local to the global teleology, Watson and Lovelock (1983) proposed (Lotka, 1925).
    [Show full text]
  • NATS 101, Sec 42 &
    GC170A-1 The Earth & Its Environment Lecture Sections 001+002 & 003+004 FALL 2011 INTRODUCTION TO GLOBAL CHANGE INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Katie Hirschboeck CLASS NOTES PACKET Fall 2011 HOW TO USE THIS CLASS NOTES PACKET Welcome to GC-170A-1! This CLASS NOTES packet is designed to be a companion to the classroom portion of GC-170A-1 Introduction to Global Change, taught by Dr. Katie Hirschboeck. You should bring this packet with you to every class. (You do NOT need to bring the textbooks: The Science of Global Change: An Introduction and Dire Predictions with you to class, unless announced in advance.) This packet contains the following: Selected notes with definitions, key points, & figures to accompany Dr. H’s lecture presentations on the course topics. Some fill-in-the-blank interactive sections that accompany a few of the lectures Several blank pages for entering your own outlines, notes, sketches and summaries as you review each topic after class while studying. Your own copy of handout materials used in class during many of the group activities, so you can take your own notes while working together as a group and refer to the activity later. More detailed background reading material that isn’t in your regular textbook to supplement some of the topics. Appendices that include items needed for specific activities and assignments at different points during the semester. Directions on how to find Dr. H’s office in the Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research (last page). See the GC-170A-1 WEBPAGE & D2L site for the latest versions of: Course Syllabus,
    [Show full text]
  • The Parable of Daisyworld: a Comprehensive Analysis
    THE PARABLE OF DAISYWORLD: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PHILIP J. PLATTS Abstract. The Daisyworld model was conceived by Watson and Lovelock (1983), to provide insight into temperature regulation on Earth. The close coupling between non-intelligent lifeforms (two varieties of daisy) and their environment is shown to regulate the planet's temperature, across a wide range of solar luminosities. Attempting to model the Earth in all its grandeur would be an undertaking of unthinkable complexity. The simplifications required to keep Daisyworld accessible prompt us to study the model with caution. I take care to discuss the validity of each assumption that the authors make, before analysing the dynamical systems at work. I investigate how increasing the diversity of life affects the global temper- ature. This is, after all, the most striking difference between Daisyworld and planet Earth. I find that, the more species present, the more efficient the coupled system of biospere and geosphere becomes in its capacity to regulate Daisyworld's temperature. However, once Darwinian evolution is allowed, di- versity actually hinders the flowers' ability to survive large perturbations in their environment. Citation: Platts PJ (2003). The Parable of Daisyworld: A Comprehensive Anal- ysis. BSc Dissertation, University of York, UK Date: May 2003. 1 2 PHILIP J. PLATTS Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Daisyworld 4 3. The Equations Explained 5 3.1. How the Flowers Grow 5 3.2. An Example: Emptyworld 7 3.3. Global Temperature 7 3.4. Local Temperature 8 3.5. Simplifying Local Temperature 9 3.6. Emptyworld Revisited 11 4. The Fixed Point at the Origin 11 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Uri J. Wilensky - 1
    Uri J. Wilensky - 1 URI J. WILENSKY Northwestern University 847-467-3818 (tel) Learning Sciences & Computer Science 847-491-8999 (fax) Center for Connected Learning & Computer-Based Modeling [email protected] Evanston, IL 60208 ACADEMIC WORK EXPERIENCE / EDUCATION Northwestern University, Evanston, IL Professor of Learning Sciences, Computer Science & Complex Systems 2008 – present Faculty member, program in Cognitive Science 2000 - present Faculty member, program in Technology and Social Behavior 2009 - present Faculty member, Segal Design Center Research Council 2014 – present Governing Board, Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems 2004 - present Associate Professor of Learning Sciences & Computer Science 2000 – 2008 Director of Center for Connected Learning & Computer-Based Modeling 2000 - present Shepard undergraduate residential college fellow 2007 - present Other University affiliations: University of Haifa Tufts University, Medford, MA 1994 - 2000 Associate Professor of Computer Science 1999 – 2000 Director of Center for Connected Learning 1994 - 2000 Assistant Professor of Education and Child Development 1994 - 1999 Director of Mathematics and Science Teacher Education Programs 1994 - 1999 Affiliated Faculty in Computer Science, Media and Communications, and Cognitive Science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 1998 - 1999 Post-doctoral Fellow 1993 - 1994 Mathematics Education, Learning Technologies Ph.D. in Media Arts and Sciences, 1993 1988-1993 Thesis: Connected Mathematics: Building Concrete Relationships
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Dynamics and Homeostatic Emergence in Complex Adaptive Ecosystem
    ECAL - General Track Collective Dynamics and Homeostatic Emergence in Complex Adaptive Ecosystem Dharani Punithan and RI (Bob) McKay Structural Complexity Laboratory, College of Engineering, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, South Korea punithan.dharani,rimsnucse @gmail.com { } Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/isal/proceedings-pdf/ecal2013/25/332/1901807/978-0-262-31709-2-ch049.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Abstract 1. Life-environment feedback via the daisyworld model We investigate the behaviour of the daisyworld model on 2. State-topology feedback via an adaptive network model an adaptive network, comparing it to previous studies on a fixed topology grid, and a fixed small-world (Newman-Watts 3. Density-growth feedback via a logistic growth model (NW)) network. The adaptive networks eventually generate topologies with small-world effect behaving similarly to the The topology of the our ecosystem evolves with a simple NW model – and radically different from the grid world. Un- der the same parameter settings, static but complex patterns local rule – a frozen habitat is reciprocally linked to an ac- emerge in the grid world. In the NW model, we see the tive habitat – and self-organises to complex topologies with emergence of completely coherent periodic dominance. In small-world effect. In this paper, we focus on the emergent the adaptive-topology world, the systems may transit through collective phenomena and properties that arise in egalitarian varied behaviours, but can self-organise to a small-world small-world ecosystems, constructed from a large number of network structure with similar cyclic behaviour to the NW model.
    [Show full text]
  • The MUCM Case Studies: Current Status and Proposals MUCM Internal Report
    The MUCM case studies: current status and proposals MUCM internal report John Paul Gosling 16th November, 2007 Abstract This internal report serves to explain the current position with regards to models and potential case studies for the MUCM project. It also pro- vides some discussion points on the direction of MUCM’s three major case studies, which are a main part of the project’s outputs. Contents 1 What is a MUCM case study? 2 2 Methodology and case studies 4 3 Models available to MUCM 7 4 Organisation of the case study workload 14 5 Case study I: biology 16 6 Case study II: environment 18 7 Case study III: engineering 20 8 Discussion and timescale 22 9 Appendix: the MUCM workpackages 23 List of Figures 1 Examplecasestudycontents. 3 2 Milestones:whenandwhat. ..................... 5 3 Arotavirusmodel........................... 17 4 Ahydrocarbonreservoirmodel . 21 5 Workpackages: numbering and methods. 23 1 1 What is a MUCM case study? The purpose of the case studies is to provide exemplars of how the MUCM meth- ods can be applied in non-trivial problems. They will illustrate combinations of techniques, and will address serious practical problems (although not necessarily offer complete solutions). Three case studies will be completed and published. The case studies will not be toy problems: in each of them, we will address questions of current and pressing concern, guided by experts on our Advisory Panel. The production of the case studies will necessarily interact with all the other aspects of the project by providing test beds for specific techniques and pulling these together into major works that are of interest to the wider scientific community.
    [Show full text]
  • Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance Flux Footprints for Areas Surrounding Ameriflux Sites
    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 301-302 (2021) 108350 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Agricultural and Forest Meteorology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agrformet Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites Housen Chu a,*, Xiangzhong Luo a,bf, Zutao Ouyang b, W. Stephen Chan a, Sigrid Dengel a, S´ebastien C. Biraud a, Margaret S. Torn a, Stefan Metzger c,d, Jitendra Kumar e, M. Altaf Arain f, Tim J. Arkebauer g, Dennis Baldocchi h, Carl Bernacchi i, Dave Billesbach g, T. Andrew Black j, Peter D. Blanken k, Gil Bohrer l, Rosvel Bracho m, Shannon Brown n, Nathaniel A. Brunsell o, Jiquan Chen p, Xingyuan Chen q, Kenneth Clark r, Ankur R. Desai d, Tomer Duman s, David Durden c, Silvano Fares t, Inke Forbrich u, John A. Gamon v,w, Christopher M. Gough x, Timothy Griffis y, Manuel Helbig z,az, David Hollinger aa, Elyn Humphreys ab, Hiroki Ikawa ac, Hiroki Iwata ad, Yang Ju l, John F. Knowles ae, Sara H. Knox af, Hideki Kobayashi ag, Thomas Kolb bg, Beverly Law aj, Xuhui Lee ak, Marcy Litvak s, Heping Liu al, J. William Munger am, Asko Noormets an, Kim Novick ao, Steven F. Oberbauer ap, Walter Oechel aq, Patty Oikawa ar, Shirley A. Papuga as, Elise Pendall at, Prajaya Prajapati an, John Prueger au, William L Quinton av, Andrew D. Richardson ah,ai, Eric S. Russell al, Russell L. Scott ae, Gregory Starr aw, Ralf Staebler ax, Paul C. Stoy d, Ellen Stuart-Ha¨entjens ay, Oliver Sonnentag az, Ryan C. Sullivan ba, Andy Suyker g, Masahito Ueyama bb, Rodrigo Vargas bc, Jeffrey D.
    [Show full text]