DOCSLIB.ORG

Study Protocol and Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study Protocol and Results Global Clinical Development - General Medicine LJN452 Clinical Trial Protocol CLJN452A2202 / NCT02855164 A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, 3- part, adaptive design, multicenter study to assess safety, tolerability and efficacy of tropifexor (LJN452) in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) FLIGHT-FXR Document type: Clinical Trial Protocol EUDRACT number: 2015-005215-33 Version number: 03 (Clean) Clinical trial phase: II Release date: 05-Oct-2017 Property of Novartis Confidential May not be used, divulged, published, or otherwise disclosed without the consent of Novartis Clinical Trial Protocol Template Version 3.2 (July 2016) Novartis Confidential Page 2 Clinical Trial Protocol v03 (Clean) Protocol No. CLJN452A2202 Table of contents Table of contents .................................................................................................................2 List of tables ........................................................................................................................6 List of figures ......................................................................................................................7 List of abbreviations ............................................................................................................8 Glossary of terms...............................................................................................................12 Amendment 3 (05-Oct-2017) ............................................................................................13 Summary of previous amendments ...................................................................................16 Protocol summary..............................................................................................................20 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................24 1.1 Background............................................................................................................24 1.2 Purpose ..................................................................................................................27 2 Study objectives and endpoints .........................................................................................27 2.1 Objectives and related endpoints...........................................................................30 3 Investigational plan ...........................................................................................................33 3.1 Study design...........................................................................................................33 3.2 Rationale for study design .....................................................................................38 3.3 Rationale for dose/regimen, route of administration and duration of treatment....39 3.3.1 Pre-Clinical Animal Studies..................................................................39 3.3.2 CLJN452X2101 – Healthy Volunteers .................................................41 3.3.3 Dose Selection.......................................................................................42 3.4 Rationale for choice of comparator .......................................................................43 3.5 Purpose and timing of interim analyses/design adaptations..................................43 3.6 Risks and benefits..................................................................................................45 4 Population..........................................................................................................................46 4.1 Inclusion criteria ....................................................................................................46 4.2 Exclusion criteria...................................................................................................47 5 Treatment...........................................................................................................................50 5.1 Study treatment......................................................................................................50 5.1.1 Investigational and control drugs ..........................................................50 5.1.2 Additional treatment..............................................................................51 5.2 Treatment arms ......................................................................................................51 5.3 Treatment assignment and randomization .............................................................52 5.4 Treatment blinding.................................................................................................53 5.5 Treating the patient ................................................................................................54 5.5.1 Patient numbering, ................................................................................54 Novartis Confidential Page 3 Clinical Trial Protocol v03 (Clean) Protocol No. CLJN452A2202 5.5.2 Dispensing the study drug.....................................................................55 5.5.3 Handling of study and additional treatment ..........................................55 5.5.4 Instructions for prescribing and taking study treatment........................55 5.5.5 Permitted dose adjustments and interruptions of study treatment ........56 5.5.6 Rescue medication ................................................................................60 5.5.7 Concomitant medication .......................................................................60 5.5.8 Prohibited medication ...........................................................................61 5.5.9 Emergency breaking of assigned treatment code..................................62 5.6 Study completion and discontinuation...................................................................63 5.6.1 Study completion and post-study treatment..........................................63 5.6.2 Discontinuation of study treatment .......................................................63 5.6.3 Withdrawal of informed consent...........................................................64 5.6.4 Loss to follow-up ..................................................................................65 5.6.5 Early study termination by the sponsor.................................................65 6 Visit schedule and assessments .........................................................................................65 6.1 Information to be collected on screening failures..................................................81 6.2 Patient demographics/other baseline characteristics .............................................81 6.2.1 Demographic Information.....................................................................81 6.2.2 Medical history......................................................................................81 6.2.3 Alcohol history and assessments...........................................................82 6.2.4 Smoking history ....................................................................................82 6.2.5 Prior and concomitant medications.......................................................82 6.2.6 Liver evaluation ....................................................................................82 6.2.7 Other baseline characteristics................................................................83 6.2.8 Screening visit 2 – additional assessments............................................84 6.3 Treatment exposure and compliance .....................................................................84 6.4 Efficacy..................................................................................................................84 6.4.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging...............................................................85 6.4.2 Liver Function Tests .............................................................................85 6.4.3 Coagulation tests ...................................................................................85 6.4.4 Markers of liver fibrosis........................................................................86 6.4.5 NAFLD fibrosis score ...........................................................................86 6.4.6 Fasting Lipids........................................................................................86 86 86 6.4.9 Liver Biopsy..........................................................................................87 Novartis Confidential Page 4 Clinical Trial Protocol v03 (Clean) Protocol No. CLJN452A2202 6.4.10 Appropriateness of efficacy assessments ..............................................87 6.5 Safety .....................................................................................................................88 6.5.1 Physical examination ............................................................................88 6.5.2 Vital signs..............................................................................................88 6.5.3 Anthropometric assessments.................................................................88 6.5.4 Laboratory evaluations..........................................................................89 6.5.5 Electrocardiogram (ECG) .....................................................................90 6.5.6 Pregnancy and assessments of fertility .................................................90 6.5.7 Appropriateness of safety measurements..............................................91
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Obeticholic Acid and INT-767 Modulate Collagen Deposition in a NASH in Vitro Model Beatrice Anfuso 1, Claudio Tiribelli 1, Luciano Adorini2 & Natalia Rosso 1*
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Obeticholic acid and INT-767 modulate collagen deposition in a NASH in vitro model Beatrice Anfuso 1, Claudio Tiribelli 1, Luciano Adorini2 & Natalia Rosso 1* Pharmacological treatments for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are still unsatisfactory. Fibrosis is the most signifcant predictor of mortality and many anti-fbrotic agents are under evaluation. Herein, we assessed in vitro the efects of the FXR agonist obeticholic acid (OCA) and the dual FXR/TGR5 agonist INT-767 in a well-established co-culture NASH model. Co-cultures of human hepatoma and hepatic stellate (HSCs) cells were exposed to free fatty acids (FFAs) alone or in combination with OCA or INT-767. mRNA expression of HSCs activation markers and FXR engagement were evaluated at 24, 96 and 144 hours. Collagen deposition and metalloproteinase 2 and 9 (MMP2-9) activity were compared to tropifexor and selonsertib. FFAs induced collagen deposition and MMP2-9 activity reduction. Co- treatment with OCA or INT-767 did not afect ACTA2 and COL1A1 expression, but signifcantly reduced FXR and induced SHP expression, as expected. OCA induced a dose-dependent reduction of collagen and induced MMP2-9 activity. Similarly, INT-767 induced collagen reduction at 96 h and a slight increase in MMP2-9. Tropifexor and Selonsertib were also efective in collagen reduction but showed no modulation of MMP2-9. All tested compounds reduced collagen deposition. OCA exerted a more potent and long-lasting efect, mainly related to modulation of collagen turn-over and MMP2-9 activity. Obesity prevalence is booming in both hig- and low-income countries has led to a surge in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a condition characterized by liver steatosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (Nafld) on Hepatic Drug Metabolism Enzymes in Human
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Dissertations 2018 EFFECT OF NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE (NAFLD) ON HEPATIC DRUG METABOLISM ENZYMES IN HUMAN Rohitash Jamwal University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss Recommended Citation Jamwal, Rohitash, "EFFECT OF NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE (NAFLD) ON HEPATIC DRUG METABOLISM ENZYMES IN HUMAN" (2018). Open Access Dissertations. Paper 811. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/811 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EFFECT OF NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE (NAFLD) ON HEPATIC DRUG METABOLISM ENZYMES IN HUMAN BY ROHITASH JAMWAL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2018 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DISSERTATION OF ROHITASH JAMWAL APPROVED: Dissertation Committee Major Professor: Fatemeh Akhlaghi Navindra Seeram Ingrid Lofgren Nasser H. Zawia DEAN OF GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2018 ABSTRACT Significant changes in dietary habits have led to a rampant increase in metabolic disorders. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one such disorder characterized by the excess buildup of fat in hepatocytes of people who drink little or no alcohol. If not managed, NAFL (simple steatosis) progress into nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and further deteriorate to cirrhosis leading to severe illness or even death. Drug disposition proteins (enzymes and transporters) in liver control the systemic exposure of drugs and xenobiotics in human and drive the efficacy as well as adverse events in the body.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)?
    What is non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)? More than just a liver disease Liver diseases are highly complex conditions driven by multiple pathways1; they are typically poorly understood, frequently overlooked and associated with a high unmet patient need worldwide. While there have been significant medical advances in viral hepatitis, non-viral liver diseases, characterized by liver inflammation and fibrosis that are often asymptomatic, have limited therapeutic options causing an increasing global chronic disease burden. One such example is non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The obesity epidemic has impacted the prevalence of NAFLD across all ages globally2,3. If left untreated, over time fat build-up in the liver triggers a cycle of chronic inflammation which develops into non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with associated fibrosis (scarring of the liver). There are currently no approved treatments for NASH, and the condition is predicted to become the leading cause of liver transplant in developed countries by 20204. The prevalence of NAFLD in Western countries is 20-30%, and it is estimated that 2-3% of the western population has NASH5. NASH: A silent disease NASH is a more severe, progressive form of NAFLD6 with generally no, or only a few, non- specific signs or symptoms. If the liver damage continues long-term, it can result in advanced fibrosis (scarring of the liver), called cirrhosis, where patients may experience symptoms such as nausea, fatigue and weight loss; with further complications leading to portal hypertension, enlarged blood vessels, enlarged spleen, mental confusion and even kidney or lung failure7. Cirrhosis leads to an increased risk of developing a type of liver cancer called hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as liver failure and, barring a transplant, significant morbidity and death7.
    [Show full text]
  • FXR Signalling: a Novel Target in Metabolic
    5 184 D P Sonne Targeting FXR in metabolic 184:5 R193–R205 Review disease MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY FXR signalling: a novel target in metabolic diseases Correspondence should be addressed to D P Sonne David P Sonne Email Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark david.peick.sonne@regionh. dk Abstract During the last decades, it has become clear that the gastrointestinal tract plays a pivotal role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis. More than 40 hormones originate from the gastrointestinal tract and several of these impact glucose metabolism and appetite regulation. An astonishing example of the gut’s integrative role in glucose metabolism originates from investigations into bile acid biology. From primary animal studies, it has become clear that bile acids should no longer be labelled as simple detergents necessary for lipid digestion and absorption but should also be recognised as metabolic regulators implicated in lipid, glucose and energy metabolism. The nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a part of an exquisite bile acid-sensing system that among other things ensures the optimal size of the bile acid pool. In addition, intestinal and hepatic FXR also impact the regulation of several metabolic processes such as glucose and lipid metabolism. Accordingly, natural and synthetic FXR agonists and certain FXR- regulated factors (i.e. fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19)) are increasingly being evaluated as treatments for metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (and its inflammatory version, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis). Interestingly, decreased FXR activation also benefits glucose metabolism. This can be obtained by reducing bile acid absorption using bile acid sequestering agents (approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes) or inhibitors of intestinal bile acid transporters,that is the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT).
    [Show full text]
  • CRO Service Specialized in NASH-HCC -Proprietary STAMTM Mouse Model
    CRO service specialized in NASH-HCC -Proprietary STAMTM mouse model- SMC Laboratories, Inc. smccro-lab.com Ver. 2021.1 1 Overview 1 Company 2 Rationale: NASH 3 STAMTM: Proprietary model for NASH-HCC 4 Pharmacological study 5 CRO service -2- Facts at a glance ■ Founded in October 2006 ■ A privately-held non-clinical CRO based in Tokyo, Japan; specialized in research on fibrosis and inflammation ■ CRO services - Non-clinical pharmacology - One of the leading CRO in liver research with Proprietary NASH-HCC (STAMTM) Model - In vivo disease models for metabolic disorders, inflammation, fibrosis and tumor - Histological imaging services - Histological scoring: NAFLD activity score, fibrosis and inflammation scores etc. -3- 2 CRO expertise: Leading CRO in NASH/HCC Over 600 clients worldwide Over 110 peer-reviewed papers and presentations 15 successful CTA packages The number of clients Region 550 500 450 Europe 400 Japan 350 US・ 300 Canada JPN 250 200 North Asia America 150 Europe 100 Asia・ 50 Oceania 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 (% of the customers) 2015 2016 2017 2018 (year) -4- CRO capability: ■ Facility - Accreditation by MEXT* - Sponsor audit (QAU) - Animal welfare audit by global pharmaceuticals ■ SPF-grade animal room: - 2080 mice ■ CRO science team: - 10 full-time researchers - 5 visiting scientists (MD, PhD) - 3 external pathologists ■ Equipment: - CT system (In vivo) - Endoscopy (In vivo) - Confocal microscopy - Dry-chemistry analyzer - Real-time PCR - Multi-mode microplate reader - And more… *MEXT: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Document
    Histopathology and imaging analysis -SMC’s CRO services in pharmacological R&D- CONTENTS: - Company Profile (P2-) - NASH Services (P4-) - Basic Services (P12-) SMC Laboratories, Inc. smccro-lab.com Ver. 2021.1 1 Facts at a glance ■ Founded in October 2006 ■ A privately-held non-clinical CRO based in Tokyo, Japan; specialized in research on fibrosis and inflammation ■ CRO services - Non-clinical pharmacology - One of the leading CRO in liver research with Proprietary NASH-HCC (STAMTM) Model - In vivo disease models for metabolic disorders, inflammation, fibrosis and tumor - Histological imaging services - Histological scoring: NAFLD activity score, fibrosis and inflammation scores etc. - 2 - 1 CRO expertise: Leading CRO in NASH/HCC ■ SMC’s CRO services Non-clinical Histological imaging pharmacology study - High-performance pharmacology services based on the - In-house, high quality analyses; proven skills in Histology company’s specialty in fibrosis research - Elaborate and comprehensive reports by Ph.D. holders - Various lineup of disease models relating to fibrosis, inflammation, metabolic disorders and cancer - Professional support for data publication/IND application - Strategic study design proposed by experienced physicians and scientists Performance Region Number of clients 600 Europe ■ Over 600 clients worldwide Japan 500 400 ■ Over 110 peer-reviewed papers and presentations Asia North 300 America ■ 15 successful CTA packages 200 100 0 (% of the customers) - 3 - (year) Histopathology and imaging services in NASH ■Histopathological parameters are important endpoints in nonclinical as well as clinical studies in NASH and liver fibrosis. SMC’s outstanding performance in NASH/liver fibrosis research: ■As a leading CRO in NASH, SMC has accumulated know-how by assessing over 600 pharmacology studies and 60,000 slides of NASH and related diseases in mouse, rat and human.
    [Show full text]
  • 1H. Liver X Receptor-Like Receptors (Version 2019.4) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database
    IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE https://doi.org/10.2218/gtopdb/F89/2019.4 1H. Liver X receptor-like receptors (version 2019.4) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database Donald P. McDonnell1 and Rachid Safi1 1. Duke University, USA Abstract Liver X and farnesoid X receptors (LXR and FXR, nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Nuclear Hormone Receptors [68]) are members of a steroid analogue-activated nuclear receptor subfamily, which form heterodimers with members of the retinoid X receptor family. Endogenous ligands for LXRs include hydroxycholesterols (OHC), while FXRs appear to be activated by bile acids. In humans and primates, NR1H5P is a pseudogene. However, in other mammals, it encodes a functional nuclear hormone receptor that appears to be involved in cholesterol biosynthesis [71]. Contents This is a citation summary for 1H. Liver X receptor-like receptors in the Guide to Pharmacology database (GtoPdb). It exists purely as an adjunct to the database to facilitate the recognition of citations to and from the database by citation analyzers. Readers will almost certainly want to visit the relevant sections of the database which are given here under database links. GtoPdb is an expert-driven guide to pharmacological targets and the substances that act on them. GtoPdb is a reference work which is most usefully represented as an on-line database. As in any publication this work should be appropriately cited, and the papers it cites should also be recognized. This document provides a citation for the relevant parts of the database, and also provides a reference list for the research cited by those parts.
    [Show full text]
  • EASL 2019 Wrap-Up Metabolic.Pptx
    Wrap-up session: Metabolic and alcohol related liver disease Fabio Marra Number of abstracts per category 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Alcoholic liver NAFLD: NAFLD: NAFLD: NAFLD: disease Clinical Diagnostics Experimental Therapy aspects Alcohol: pathogenesis PS-173 Nagy Distinct functions for RIP3 and MLKL In murine models of ALD vs NAFL/NASH Ethanol-induced liver injury: • RIP3 drives injury independently of MLKL High fat diet-induced liver injury • MLKL drives injury independently RIP3 Alcohol: clinical aspects PS-057 Glyn-Owen Health Survey for England 2016 • Cross sectional survey of households • Designed to be representative of the general population of England • 7,826 adults of whom 3,791 (48%) provided a blood sample • 89.2% of sample had at least one risk factor for liver disease • 28.4% had two or more risk factors (alcohol>14 units/wk (112g/wk), BMI≥25, waist circumference high/very high, diabetes) • 13% of population are drinking above recommended alcohol (but not high risk alcohol) AND are obese or overweight • we call this group at risk of BAFLD = Both Alcohol And Fatty Liver Disease) • This group is often missed in clinical referral pathways from primary to secondary care PS-057 Glyn-Owen Proportion of the general population with high liver blood tests and fibrosis scores 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% representave sample Propor:on of the populaon 0% Male Female 18-24yrs 25-34yrs 35-44yrs 45-54yrs 55-64yrs 65-74yrs 75+ yrs High ALT High AST High Fib4 High APRI≥1.0 High AST:ALT rao • 10.9% had high ALT or AST (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination for Therapy Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: Rationale, Opportunities and Challenges
    Recent advances in clinical practice Combination for therapy non- alcoholic steatohepatitis: rationale, opportunities Gut: first published as 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319104 on 7 May 2020. Downloaded from and challenges Jean- François Dufour ,1,2 Cyrielle Caussy,3,4 Rohit Loomba5 1Hepatology, Department of ABStract for clinical approval of new drugs for the treat- Clinical Research, University of Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is becoming a ment of NASH, trials should include patients who Bern, Bern, Switzerland 2University Clinic for Visceral leading cause of cirrhosis with the burden of NASH- have significantly higher risk of progression to Surgery and Medicine, related complications projected to increase massively cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation, as defined as Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland over the coming years. Several molecules with different those who have biopsy-proven NASH with stage 2 3 Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, mechanisms of action are currently in development to fibrosis or higher. The regulatory approval pathway Endocrinologie Diabète et treat NASH, although reported efficacy to date has been for pharmacological therapies for NASH requires Nutrition, University Lyon 1, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, limited. Given the complexity of the pathophysiology therapies to show clinical benefit in improving France of NASH, it will take the engagement of several targets liver- related outcomes for full regulatory approval, 4 NAFLD Research Center, and pathways to improve the results of pharmacological which may take several years due to low event rates. University of California at San intervention, which provides a rationale for combination To expedite drug development, liver histological Diego, La Jolla, California, USA 5Division of Gastroenterology therapies in the treatment of NASH.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Gut–Liver Axis for Treatment of Liver Fibrosis and Portal Hypertension
    Review Targeting Gut–Liver Axis for Treatment of Liver Fibrosis and Portal Hypertension Eric Kalo 1 , Scott Read 1,2,3,† and Golo Ahlenstiel 1,2,3,*,† 1 Blacktown Clinical School, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia; [email protected] (E.K.); [email protected] (S.R.) 2 Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia 3 Storr Liver Centre, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-9851-6073; Fax: +61-2-9851-6050 † These authors contribute equally to this work. Abstract: Antifibrotic therapies for the treatment of liver fibrosis represent an unconquered area of drug development. The significant involvement of the gut microbiota as a driving force in a multitude of liver disease, be it pathogenesis or fibrotic progression, suggest that targeting the gut–liver axis, relevant signaling pathways, and/or manipulation of the gut’s commensal microbial composition and its metabolites may offer opportunities for biomarker discovery, novel therapies and personalized medicine development. Here, we review potential links between bacterial translocation and deficits of host-microbiome compartmentalization and liver fibrosis that occur in settings of advanced chronic liver disease. We discuss established and emerging therapeutic strategies, translated from our current knowledge of the gut–liver axis, targeted at restoring intestinal eubiosis, ameliorating hepatic fibrosis and rising portal hypertension that characterize and define the course of decompensated cirrhosis. Keywords: liver fibrosis; portal hypertension; microbiota; cirrhosis; chronic liver disease; gut–liver Citation: Kalo, E.; Read, S.; Ahlenstiel, G. Targeting Gut–Liver axis; bacterial translocation; hepatic macrophages; PRRs; TLRs Axis for Treatment of Liver Fibrosis and Portal Hypertension.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Novel Farnesoid X Receptor Agonists and Validation Of
    molecules Article Synthesis of Novel Farnesoid X Receptor Agonists and Validation of Their Efficacy in Activating Differentiation of Mouse Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells into Osteoblasts Ko Fujimori 1,* , Yusuke Iguchi 2, Yukiko Yamashita 2, Keigo Gohda 3 and Naoki Teno 4,5 1 Department of Pathobiochemistry, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4-20-1 Nasahara, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-1094, Japan 2 Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hiroshima International University, 5-1-1, Hirokoshingai, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0112, Japan; [email protected] (Y.I.); [email protected] (Y.Y.) 3 Computer-aided Molecular Modeling Research Center, Kansai (CAMM-Kansai), 3-32-302, Tsuto-Otsuka, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8241, Japan; [email protected] 4 Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hiroshima International University, 5-1-1, Hirokoshingai, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0112, Japan; [email protected] 5 Faculty of Clinical Nutrition, Hiroshima International University, 5-1-1, Hirokoshingai, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0112, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-72-690-1215 Received: 12 October 2019; Accepted: 14 November 2019; Published: 16 November 2019 Abstract: The modulators of farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a bile acid receptor, regulate various biological processes including bile acid metabolism, and are associated with the control of fatty liver and osteoporosis. Thus, the control of FXR activity and development of FXR modulators are critical not only for research, but also for clinical application. In this study, we synthesized novel FXR agonists 1–4 possessing isoxazole and N-substituted benzimidazole moieties, and compared their effects on osteoblast differentiation with the known FXR agonists, chenodeoxycholic acid and a synthetic compound, GW4064.
    [Show full text]
  • 12Th International ISSX Meeting 28‒31 July 2019 Portland, Oregon
    ABSTRACTS FROM THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL ISSX MEETING 28‒31 July 2019 Portland, Oregon, USA 12th International ISSX Meeting 28‒31 July 2019 Portland, Oregon, USA Contents Sunday, 28 July 2019 Short Course 1: Advances in the Role of Transporters in Drug Development 3 Abstracts: SC1.1 - SC1.5 Short Course 2: Non-P450 Enzymes in ADMET for Drug Discovery and Development 5 Abstracts: S2.1 - SC2.4 Short Course 3: State of the Art PKPD and QSP Modeling 6 Abstracts: SC3.1 - SC3.5 Short Course 4: Idiosyncratic Drug-induced Liver Injury 8 Abstracts: SC4.1 - SC4.4 Keynote Lecture: Model-Informed Precision Dosing at the Bedside: Scientific Challenges and Opportunities 10 Abstract: K1 Monday, 29 July 2019 Plenary Lecture 1: How Technology, Big Data and Systems Approaches are Transforming 21st Century Healthcare 10 Abstract: L1 Pre-doctoral/Graduate and Postdoctoral Poster Awards Finalist Poster Presentations 40 Abstracts: A1 - A12 Poster Presentation Session 1 47 Abstracts: P1 - P87 Parallel Symposium 1: Personalized Medicine: Use of Pharmacogenomics and Other Patient-specific Factors to Individualize Drug Dosing and Treatment 11 Abstracts: S1.1 - S1.4 Parallel Symposium 2: State of the Art for Organs on Chips 12 Abstracts: S2.1 - S2.4 Parallel Symposium 3: Quantitative Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacology Methods and Strategies in the Discovery and Development of Biotherapeutics 13 Abstracts: S3.1 - S3.4 Parallel Symposium 4: Microbiome-Environment-Drug Interactions: Emerging Tools and Applications 15 Abstracts: S4.1 - S4.4 Tuesday, 30 July 2019 Plenary
    [Show full text]