DOCSLIB.ORG

Gettysburg-Brochure.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gettysburg-Brochure.Pdf To Carlisle Chambersburg 30 H CONFEDERATE ADVANCE H 219 220 (Not to Scale) and Harrisburg Cashtown Inn HISTORIC N ATIONAL RD 40 Hanover H Aldie Mill – On June 17, 1863 the first of several days of Cumberland Fairfield 116 (Multiple Sites) To York and fighting broke out here as Union forces pushed west looking 68 70 16 GETTYSBURG 116 Wrightsville for the main Confederate army. 219 Monterey 116 Garrett County Waynesboro Rouzerville Pass (See Inset) Littlestown H Middleburg – Confederate cavalry delayed the Union push here Visitor Center 16 16 again on June 19, 1863. Village of 94 Stateline 60 H Goose Creek Bridge – Fighting here on June 21, 1863 HOUSE 135 220 OL R HO D centered around the historic bridge. MASON AND DIXON LINE SC 97 522 418 KS 140 BLAC H Upperville – A ‘Swirling’ cavalry fight here on June 21, 1863 Conoc oc 494 E h S further delayed the Union attempts to find the main Cr e V T e A O e a N k g N E Confederate army. O R u Crossing T D e Leitersburg E H Stephenson Depot – Fighting here on June 14, 1863 cleared the Mason and S Emmitsburg 50 (Union Encampment) Manchester the way for the Confederate advance into Pennsylvania. GARRETT AND ALLEGANY COUNTIES Dixon Line 60 140 194 Union Mills (Pipe Creek 81 OLD HANOVER RD. H (Stuart Encampment) Right Flank) Williamsport – Confederate Army’s invasion began here on 63 58 June 15, 1863, and its “Wagon Train of Misery” retreated through Clear Soldiers at rest Spring 15 here after Gettysburg. 11 Taneytown H Catoctin Mountain Shielding the Army – South Mountain, to the east, shielded 40 Smithsburg HIS IONAL RD National Park the Confederates from observation by the Union Army. TORIC NAT Cavalry Battle 30 D R Shielding HAGERSTOWN H Crossing the Mason and Dixon Line – Soldiers from both G 64 N I the Army 194 R armies passed by this historic intersection multiple times P S 68 70 77 IG throughout the war. B Thurmont 832 I L 140 27 H 56 40 Creek 97 Gaithersburg (Summit Hill Farm) – Confederate cavalry Williamsport R A ipe T D P arrived here on June 28th, 1863 intent on arresting Union (C&O Canal NHP) R Big N E Battle of C 84 A D supporters. Fort Frederick A R South Mountain N E Funkstown R 77 G I U F D State Park Recreation Area Cunningham Falls I H Darnestown Park – Confederate cavalry enter town on IN R H T B RD State Park C DLEBURG June 27, 1863. Williamsport O G MID T U C N Old Frederick Road N 65 A O ION C S TOW S (Loy’s Station) Middleburg N H A RD Cashtown Inn – Stand in the footsteps of Confederate soldiers Battle of 806 Catoctin E . H 550 Uniontown 97 WESTMINSTER L (Pipe Creek as they marched to Gettysburg. GETTYSBURG Wagoners C Furnace ALT A T Left Flank) A 40 O WESTMINSTER H Wrightsville – A fierce battle took place here on June 28, 1863 C RD Union Bridge T L 68 P IL I M N CKS D before the Battle of Gettysburg. LA R (See Inset) M B P K 84 81 E O C 140 V U I R A A N E T W ASHINGTON A 27 D I 34 A . E N J.E.B. STUART’S CAVALRY TOUR I 66 D Battle of R N F 31 R A 30 30 Jones’ 140 V H D N Falling Waters L Devil’s W L H Rowser’s Ford (Seneca) – On the night of June 27–28, 1863, O Y 97 O T U S Crossroads Y NION G T Backbone OWN N N RD Gen. J.E.B. Stuart’s 5,000 cavalrymen crossed into Maryland here. 11 I N E H R L P 15 Park Battle of Greenbrier Lewistown New Windsor S H Rockville – Stuart occupied the town on June 28, 1863, E Woodsboro A Headquarters Meade’s State Park W Boonsboro V D 31 I and found both Confederate sympathizers and loyal Unionists. HQ L FREDERICK O GETTYSBURG R 140 116 116 k Y H Brookeville – On June 29, 1863, Gen. J.E.B. Stuart paroled C e 15 A Depot e 31 almost 400 prisoners here. r C 550 C Gettysburg O Courthouse H Cooksville – Union troops saved vitally important artillery 65 m Boonsboro N a 40 Destination National t O during Confederate cavalry attack on June 19, 1863. e C i M Gettysburg Military Park &O t 194 Can n H Sykesville – On June 29, 1863, Confederate cavalry hatched BUS al N A 34 Corbit’s Charge 15 HP Gambrill a plan to capture Union Gen. Hooker near here. It failed. Antietam State Park 97 M National A H Westminster – Stuart’s cavalry clashed with the Union’s 1st Keedysville IN 97 Battlefield Richfield Walkersville ST Delaware Cavalry here on June 29, 1863. 17 27 27 DOGSTR 32 140 EE Libertytown H Union Mills – Stuart breakfasted here at the William Shriver MARTINSBURG T 26 Carroll County D house on June 30 with Union infantry on his heels. 134 R 70 R Farm Museum A ALT I R D B 40 R 97 Sharpsburg T 26 67 N N CARROLL 45 O Martinsburg U Landon H UNION ADVANCE H T O Rose Hill G Visitor Center, M N C. Burns I H H Guilford Signal Station – A vital link in the Union communica- Belle Boyd House Manor T S SHEPHERDSTOWN T Middletown S Park A R Boteler’s Ford and T W E South Mountain E tion chain between the Army of the Potomac and Washington, D.C. G K D Blackford’s Ford O State Battlefield R L R O D A H Edward’s Ferry – Most of the Union army, pursuing Lee’s M 32 N army, crossed the Potomac here June 24-25, 1863. Prospect 17 40 75 H Poolesville – From here Hooker wired Gen. Henry Halleck in RD Hall IP B LL UT FREDERICK (See Inset) HI TERFL Washington, D.C. concerning supplies to be sent to Frederick. P Y LN T M E H Barnesville – Three Union infantry corps marched through FREDERICK W 3RD ST Y E3RD ST 26 AV ST 144 ALLE this little town, June 26–28, 1863. ST New Market 180 70 M H Point of Rocks – This was a major crossing point between 355 A R COURT MARKET MAXWELL CHAPEL N EAST ST D W 2ND ST E2ND ST R R I Confederate Virginia and Unionist Western Maryland. O R E E T ST T North Market Street T Monocacy 40 T L S AV Mount Airy S H O V Jefferson – In late June 1863, many pro-Union residents Z COUNCILST Pine Grove Sykesville H I T National Battlefield LL N WEST Hood’s E welcomed the Federals with cheers and flowers. E Jefferson Chapel R B RECORD W CHURCH ST Mill D COLLEGE H Middletown – The Union army marched through the town on M D O R Car City U E r D oll N H C 340 R T its way north, and Union cavalry passed through after the Battle re 67 T Y ek Hall VIRGINIA R V 85 S I E L R D O Marriottsville at Gettysburg. L F ICK ST EPATRICK ST N E 80 H PATR A RD ISTO W 144 L RIC H Prospect Hall – On June 28, 1863, Meade replaced Hooker NA Buckeystown TIONAL R as Commander of the Army of the Potomac. 230 Jefferson County 80 D National Museum of 99 Visitors Center 17 K H Frederick – Troops from both sides occupied the town at Civil War Medicine C FREDERIC RD h LD DEG O different times in 1862, 1863 and 1864. es Cooksville T 355 a 80 To Baltimore S RA pe Brunswick 15 N W ALL SAINTS ST E ALL SAINTS ST S EAST ST a 144 N k H Rose Hill Manor – Home of Maryland’s first governor. The Union O P e an S G d R O E l Hi E O h na s io o to F S Can ti army’s large artillery reserve camped here in late June 1863. F T al a r 70 T 340 R N E Harpers Ferry O i 270 40 c 355 J E M A C a 464 W SOUTH ST ICE ST CHARLES V H Richfield – On June 28, 1863, Meade promoted three young S CARROLL ST I National Historical Park R R I V E R l cavalry officers up four ranks to general. E SOUTHST TOWN P H a Prospect r H Lewistown – Saw Union troops on June 28, 1863, en route to A k Hall O Sugarloaf Mountain D Hyattstown 27 Gettysburg and on July 7, 1863, pursuing the Confederates. 671 Point of Rocks Natural Area N H Catoctin Furnace – Ironworks continued to operate even as A HOWARD N Little Bennett Union and Confederates marched by throughout the campaign. E 28 Regional Park H H Thurmont – Union infantry passed by here on June 29, 1863, S on the way to Gettysburg and pursued Confederate cavalry after the battle. Licksville ROCKVILLE (Tuscarora) H Old Frederick Road (Loy’s Station) – A Union corps marched Clarksburg through here pursuing the Confederate army both before and 109 BAR NE after the battle. SVIL Monocacy LE RD 108 Stephenson OLD BALTIMORE R 121 H Middleburg – Site of Union army’s left flank on Pipe Creek Depot Aqueduct D Barnesville between June 28 and July 1, 1863.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lee's Mistake: Learning from the Decision to Order Pickett's Charge
    Defense Number 54 A publication of the Center for Technology and National Security Policy A U G U S T 2 0 0 6 National Defense University Horizons Lee’s Mistake: Learning from the Decision to Order Pickett’s Charge by David C. Gompert and Richard L. Kugler I think that this is the strongest position on which Robert E. Lee is widely and rightly regarded as one of the fin- to fight a battle that I ever saw. est generals in history. Yet on July 3, 1863, the third day of the Battle — Winfield Scott Hancock, surveying his position of Gettysburg, he ordered a frontal assault across a mile of open field on Cemetery Ridge against the strong center of the Union line. The stunning Confederate It is my opinion that no 15,000 men ever arrayed defeat that ensued produced heavier casualties than Lee’s army could for battle can take that position. afford and abruptly ended its invasion of the North. That the Army of Northern Virginia could fight on for 2 more years after Gettysburg was — James Longstreet to Robert E. Lee, surveying a tribute to Lee’s abilities.1 While Lee’s disciples defended his decision Hancock’s position vigorously—they blamed James Longstreet, the corps commander in This is a desperate thing to attempt. charge of the attack, for desultory execution—historians and military — Richard Garnett to Lewis Armistead, analysts agree that it was a mistake. For whatever reason, Lee was reti- prior to Pickett’s Charge cent about his reasoning at the time and later.2 The fault is entirely my own.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bosnian Train and Equip Program: a Lesson in Interagency Integration of Hard and Soft Power by Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 15 The Bosnian Train and Equip Program: A Lesson in Interagency Integration of Hard and Soft Power by Christopher J. Lamb, with Sarah Arkin and Sally Scudder Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified com- batant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: President Bill Clinton addressing Croat-Muslim Federation Peace Agreement signing ceremony in the Old Executive Office Building, March 18, 1994 (William J. Clinton Presidential Library) The Bosnian Train and Equip Program The Bosnian Train and Equip Program: A Lesson in Interagency Integration of Hard and Soft Power By Christopher J. Lamb with Sarah Arkin and Sally Scudder Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 15 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. March 2014 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • “Never Was I So Depressed”
    The Army of Northern Virginia in the Gettysburg Campaign “Never Was I So Depressed” James Longstreet and Pickett’s Charge Karlton D. Smith On July 24, 1863, Lt. Gen. James Longstreet wrote a private letter to his uncle, Augusts Baldwin Longstreet. In discussing his role in the Gettysburg Campaign, the general stated: General Lee chose the plan adopted, and he is the person appointed to chose and to order. I consider it a part of my duty to express my views to the commanding general. If he approves and adopts them it is well; if he does not, it is my duty to adopt his views, and to execute his orders as faithfully as if they were my own. While clearly not approving Lee’s plan of attack on July 3, Longstreet did everything he could, both before and during the attack, to ensure its success.1 Born in 1821, James Longstreet was an 1842 graduate of West Point. An “Old Army” regular, Longstreet saw extensive front line combat service in the Mexican War in both the northern and southern theaters of operations. Longstreet led detachments that helped to capture two of the Mexican forts guarding Monterey and was involved in the street fighting in the city. At Churubusco, Longstreet planted the regimental colors on the walls of the fort and saw action at Casa Marta, near Molino del Ray. On August 13, 1847, Longstreet was wounded during the assault on Chapaltepec while “in the act of discharging the piece of a wounded man." The same report noted that during the action, "He was always in front with the colors.
    [Show full text]
  • CTEF) the Estimated Cost of This Report Or Study for the Department of Defense Is Approximately $7,720 for the 2020 Fiscal Year
    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BUDGET FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2021 February 2020 Justification for FY 2021 Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) COUNTER-ISLAMIC STATE OF IRAQ AND SYRIA (ISIS) TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $7,720 for the 2020 Fiscal Year. This includes $150 in expenses and $7,570 in DoD labor. Generated on 2020Feb05 RefID: 4-83DDD29 UNCLASSIFIED FY 2021 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) REQUEST COUNTER-ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) TABLE OF CONTENTS: Page I. Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Summary 3 II. Iraq Program Summary 4 A. Iraq Ministry of Defense Program Summary 5 B. Iraq Counter Terrorism Service Program Summary 6 C. Iraq Ministry of Interior Program Summary 6 D. Iraq Ministry of Peshmerga Program Summary 7 III. Requirements in Iraq By Financial Activity Plan Category 8 A. Training and Equipping 8 B. Logistical Support, Supplies, and Services 19 C. Stipends 19 D. Infrastructure Repair, and Renovation 19 E. Sustainment 20 IV. Impact if Not Funded 23 1 COUNTER-ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED FY 2021 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) REQUEST COUNTER-ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) V. Syria Program Summary 25 VI. Requirements in Syria By Financial Activity Plan Category 27 A. Training and Equipping 27 B. Logistical Support, Supplies, and Services 32 C. Stipends 33 D. Infrastructure Repair, and Renovation 33 E. Sustainment 34 VII. Impact if Not Funded 34 2 COUNTER-ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED FY 2021 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) REQUEST COUNTER-ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) I.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Civil War: a War of Logistics
    THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR: A WAR OF LOGISTICS Franklin M. Welter A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2015 Committee: Rebecca Mancuso, Advisor Dwayne Beggs © 2015 Franklin M. Welter All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Rebecca Mancuso, Advisor The American Civil War was the first modern war. It was fought with weapons capable of dealing death on a scale never before seen. It was also the first war which saw the widespread use of the railroad. Across the country men, materials, and supplies were transported along the iron rails which industrial revolution swept in. Without the railroads, the Union would have been unable to win the war. All of the resources, men, and materials available to the North mean little when they cannot be shipped across the great expanse which was the North during the Civil War. The goals of this thesis are to examine the roles and issues faced by seemingly independent people in very different situations during the war, and to investigate how the problems which these people encountered were overcome. The first chapter, centered in Ohio, gives insight into the roles which noncombatants played in the process. Farmers, bakers, and others behind the lines. Chapter two covers the journey across the rails, the challenges faced, and how they were overcome. This chapter looks at how those in command handled the railroad, how it affected the battles, especially Gettysburg, and how the railroads were defended over the course of the war, something which had never before needed to be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection SC 0084 W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection 1862
    Collection SC 0084 W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection 1862 Table of Contents User Information Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Container List Processed by Emily Hershman 27 June 2011 Thomas Balch Library 208 W. Market Street Leesburg, VA 20176 USER INFORMATION VOLUME OF COLLECTION: 2 folders COLLECTION DATES: 1862 PROVENANCE: W. Roger Smith, Midland, TX. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS: Collection open for research USE RESTRICTIONS: No physical characteristics affect use of this material. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS: Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must be obtained in writing from Thomas Balch Library. CITE AS: W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection, 1862 (SC 0084), Thomas Balch Library, Leesburg, VA. ALTERNATE FORMATS: None OTHER FINDING AIDS: None TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: None RELATED HOLDINGS: None ACCESSION NUMBERS: 1995.0046 NOTES: Formerly filed in Thomas Balch Library Vertical Files 2 HISTORICAL SKETCH From its organization in July 1861, the Army of the Potomac remained the primary Union military force in the East, confronting General Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) Army of Northern Virginia in a series of battles and skirmishes. In the early years of the Civil War, however, the Army of the Potomac suffered defeats at the Battle of the First Bull Run in 1861, the Peninsula Campaign and the Battle of Fredericksburg in 1862, as well as the Battle of Chancellorsville in 1863. Historians attribute its initial lack of victories to poor leadership from a succession of indecisive generals: Irvin McDowell (1818-1885), George McClellan (1826-1885), Ambrose Burnside (1824-1881), and Joseph Hooker (1814-1879). When General George Meade (1815-1872) took command of the Army of the Potomac in June 1863, he was successful in pushing the Army of Northern Virginia out of Pennsylvania following the Battle of Gettysburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Oliver Cromwell and the Siege of Drogheda
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers 2017 Just Warfare, or Genocide?: Oliver Cromwell and the Siege of Drogheda Lukas Dregne Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dregne, Lukas, "Just Warfare, or Genocide?: Oliver Cromwell and the Siege of Drogheda" (2017). Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers. 175. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp/175 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dregne Just Warfare, or Genocide? Just Warfare, or Genocide?: Oliver Cromwell and the Siege of Drogheda." Sir, the state, in choosing men to serve it, takes no notice of their opinions; if they be willing to serve it, that satisfies. I advised you formerly to bear with minds of different men from yourself. Take heed of being sharp against those to whom you can object little but that they square not with you in matters of religion. - Cromwell, To Major General Crawford (1643) Lukas Dregne B.A., History, Political Science University of Montana 1 Dregne Just Warfare, or Genocide? Abstract: Oliver Cromwell has always been a subject of fierce debate since his death on September 3, 1658. The most notorious stain blotting his reputation occurred during the conquest of Ireland by forces of the English Parliament under his command.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Sailor's Creek
    THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war.
    [Show full text]
  • Meigs Chapter 8
    CHAPTER 8—1861 [FEB.] 20TH. To Washington, where I had again the happiness of em- bracing my wife and children. Finding them all well and rejoiced, like myself, to be once more together. As I left Washington on the 22nd of October, I have been just 4 months absent, less 2 days. [FEB.] 21ST. To Engineer office. General Totten took me over to see the Secretary, 1 who received me most kindly. Complimented me upon my conduct and said he was glad to see me back again in Washington, in my right place. He told me that Floyd had told the cabinet that he had a long rigamarole of a letter from Captain Meigs, that pestilent fellow who got trouble wherever he went, and that it was perfectly ridiculous that he wanted men and guns to defend the Tortugas and some heap of rocks, perfectly indefensible. And the cabinet, not being prepared to expect false representations from one of their colleagues, believed him, thought me a silly fellow, and did not read my letters. Soon after Floyd’s exposure, General Scott 2 came. One of the first things he called attention to was the great importance of holding with sufficient garrison and stores the fortress of the Tortugas and of great asset. Then Floyd’s speech about my letters was told to him. He ad- vised them to read my reports, that he had a letter from me which was very much to the point and not at all rigamarole. On reading them, Mr. Holt says he is astonished at the vision they showed.
    [Show full text]
  • PICKETT's CHARGE Gettysburg National Military Park STUDENT
    PICKETT’S CHARGE I Gettysburg National Military Park STUDENT PROGRAM U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Pickett's Charge A Student Education Program at Gettysburg National Military Park TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 How To Use This Booklet ••••..••.••...• 3 Section 2 Program Overview . • . • . • . • . 4 Section 3 Field Trip Day Procedures • • • . • • • . 5 Section 4 Essential Background and Activities . 6 A Causes ofthe American Civil War ••..•...... 7 ft The Battle ofGettysburg . • • • . • . 10 A Pi.ckett's Charge Vocabulary •............... 14 A Name Tags ••.. ... ...........• . •......... 15 A Election ofOfficers and Insignia ......•..•.. 15 A Assignm~t ofSoldier Identity •..••......... 17 A Flag-Making ............................. 22 ft Drill of the Company (Your Class) ........... 23 Section 5 Additional Background and Activities .••.. 24 Structure ofthe Confederate Army .......... 25 Confederate Leaders at Gettysburg ••.•••.••• 27 History of the 28th Virginia Regiment ....... 30 History of the 57th Virginia Regiment . .. .... 32 Infantry Soldier Equipment ................ 34 Civil War Weaponry . · · · · · · 35 Pre-Vtsit Discussion Questions . • . 37 11:me Line . 38 ... Section 6 B us A ct1vities ........................• 39 Soldier Pastimes . 39 Pickett's Charge Matching . ••.......•....... 43 Pickett's Charge Matching - Answer Key . 44 •• A .•. Section 7 P ost-V 1s1t ctivities .................... 45 Post-Visit Activity Ideas . • . • . • . • . 45 After Pickett's Charge . • • • • . • . 46 Key: ft = Essential Preparation for Trip 2 Section 1 How to Use This Booklet Your students will gain the most benefit from this program if they are prepared for their visit. The preparatory information and activities in this booklet are necessary because .. • students retain the most information when they are pre­ pared for the field trip, knowing what to expect, what is expected of them, and with some base of knowledge upon which the program ranger can build.
    [Show full text]
  • “Never Have I Seen Such a Charge”
    The Army of Northern Virginia in the Gettysburg Campaign “Never Have I Seen Such a Charge” Pender’s Light Division at Gettysburg, July 1 D. Scott Hartwig It was July 1 at Gettysburg and the battle west of town had been raging furiously since 1:30 p.m. By dint of only the hardest fighting troops of Major General Henry Heth’s and Major General Robert E. Rodes’s divisions had driven elements of the Union 1st Corps from their positions along McPherson’s Ridge, back to Seminary Ridge. Here, the bloodied Union regiments and batteries hastily organized a defense to meet the storm they all knew would soon break upon them. This was the last possible line of defense beyond the town and the high ground south of it. It had to be held as long as possible. To break this last line of Union resistance, Confederate Third Corps commander, Lieutenant General Ambrose P. Hill, committed his last reserve, the division of Major General Dorsey Pender. They were the famed Light Division of the Army of Northern Virginia, boasting a battle record from the Seven Days battles to Chancellorsville unsurpassed by any other division in the army. Arguably, it may have been the best division in Lee’s army. Certainly no organization of the army could claim more combat experience. Now, Hill would call upon his old division once more to make a desperate assault to secure victory. In many ways their charge upon Seminary Ridge would be symbolic of why the Army of Northern Virginia had enjoyed an unbroken string of victories through 1862 and 1863, and why they would meet defeat at Gettysburg.
    [Show full text]