PETRO-MINERALOGICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MIDDLE NEOLITHIC BÜKK CULTURE FINE WARE ()

SZILÁGYI, V.1 - T. BIRÓ, K.2 - CSENGERI, P.3 - SZAKMÁNY, Gy.4 - TAUBALD, H.5 - MIHÁLY, J.6 - BERTHOLD, C.5 - S. KOÓS, J.3 - ZÖLDFÖLDI, J.5 1Institute of Isotopes, HAS, Hungary, [email protected] 2Hungarian National Museum, Budapest, Hungary 3Herman Ottó Museum, , Hungary 4Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary 5University of Tübingen, Germany 6Chemical Research Center, HAS, Budapest, Hungary

Distribution of pottery from the Middle Neolithic Bükk culture ‘OLD-NEW’ DAAD-MÖB PROJECT ON BÜKK FINE WARE N Highland areas Boundary of the core of territory occupied by the Based on the results of a previous (2005-2006) collaboration ( http://www.ace.hu/daad/ Bükk Culture Excavated archaeological daad2/) the complex topic of the prehistoric long distance trade of ceramics is investigated UKRAINE sites with Bükk

A fineware I

R

(http://www.ace.hu/daad/daad3/objectives.html). T

S

U In our previous project, we focused on the investigation of Early Neolithic pottery, potential raw A

materials and the characterization of site specific features in different geographic ROMANIA environments of Hungary. Neolithic pottery manufacturing is found to be usually local activity, HUNGARY the potters utilized raw materials deriving from local or near sources. Long distance trade of C pottery can be hypothesed only for some outstandingly high quality ceramics. A limited set of RO AT SERBIA IA & such fine ware was already investigated from the Middle Neolithic Bükk Culture (c. 5000 MONTENEGRO GARADNA-ELKERÜLO ÚT SITES INVOLVED INTO THIS B.C.) (Szilágyi et al., 2008). According to the suppositions of archaeological arguments, the 100 km PROJECT long distance trade of this special ceramic type seemed to be probable. ‘OLD SITES’: -Baradla Cave, Sajószentpéter-Kövecses, Borsod- Detailed archaeometrical investigation may help to decide whether different occurrences of Derékegyháza, Felsővadász-Várdomb ‘NEW SITES’: -Kutyasor, Boldogkőváralja-Leányvár, Garadna- the Bükk fine ware with the same quality, shapes and decorations derived from the same raw Photos taken by Géza Kulcsár (HOM) and István Hajdú elkerülőút, Site No.2, Miskolc-Szeleta Cave material or it was the knowledge of the handicraftspersons that was adapted in another cultural region using the local raw materials. In order to answer these questions, Bükk fine ware is GARADNA - ELKERÜLŐ ÚT, SITE NO. 2: A LONG TIME systematically examined with coarse pottery and comparative geological samples (local HABITATION OF THE BÜKK CULTURE clay/soil) by each archaeological site. Applying a combination of petro-minerological and geochemical investigations (PM, μ-XRD, μ- and FT-Raman, μ-ATR-FTIR, μ-XRF, XRF), As an ideal example for tracking of changes of the pottery manufacturing of the Bükk complex information on the material of the pottery (fabric, tempering, surface decoration) Culture in time, Garadna - elkerülő út, No. 2 site was selected to present our results. could be gained. Garadna is situated in the valley of Hernád river, Northern Mountain Range, NE Hungary. The excavation, which was lead by P. Csengeri in 2003, extended to 2.000 m2 Aims of our project on the top and slope of a slightly risen hill near to the river. According to the (1) to reconsider the distribution map of the Bükk Culture fine ware by scientific investigations archaeological processing of the excavated finds, the settlement was inhabited from the and to understand better the civilization that produce these archaeological objects by the earliest Bükk ‘A’ phase (or the latest Tiszadob Culture). Evidence of continuous settling gained arguments. comes from ceramic finds of the preclassical ‘AB’, the classical ‘B’ and the late ‘C’ (2) to determine and gather those (chemical, physical, petro-mineralogical) characteristics phases. The most significant feature of the earliest phase’s settlement is a large-sized which specifically describe the Bükk Culture fine ware using mainly non-destructive methods pit complex. The later phases are associated with storing and refuse pits, hearths, kilns (3) to investigate the surface treatments and materials of the Bükk Culture fine ware and 13 burials. About half of the excavated 15.000 ceramic pieces of the Bükk Culture was fine ware with thin walls, incised and/or incrustated decoration, and polished surface. 0.09 EXTENSION OF THE GEOCHEMICAL CATEGORIZATION OF BÜKK FINEWARE NOTES ON THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE BÜKK CULTURE 0.08 OLD DATA from different sites Internal chronology of the Bükk Culture has not been cleared up so far. Temporal Bükk fineware divisions have been based on the changes of engraved motifs (Lichardus, 1974: Bükk 0.07 ‘A’-’AB’-’B’-’C’ phases; Kalicz & Makkay, 1977: Bükk I-II-III phases; Siska, 1995). There 3 former category Similar fineware O

2 for Bükk fineware l Bükk coarseware are no radiocarbon dates for proving the coincidence of these ‘ceramic phases’ with time A

/ 0.06 2 intervals. A O i T A 0.05 C C A NEW DATA from different sites AB EARLY PHASE (PRE)CLASSICAL PHASE LATE PHASE C Bükk fineware from Garadna AB Bükk coarseware from Garadna AB Dense engraving Very dense 0.04 Bükk fineware Engraved linear and with white engraving with Bükk coarseware wavy pattern incrustation yellow-red 0.03 with white (zigzag and incrustation 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 incrustation arched pattern) Y/V

Sample/PAAS Trace element distribution by XRF 10 Motifs show connection to the More dense decoration with fine ceramics of the same earlier Tiszadob Culture’s Refined decoration of dense- MINERALOGY OF INCRUSTS GARADNA common arched motifs raw material decoration filigrane lines and plain sectors For both white and red incrustations, the recorded µ-ATR-FTIR spectra resemble 1 typical spectra of clays. The OH stretching bands of interlayer and inner O-H group at Bükk fineware of -1 Early ‘A’ phase 3700 and 3620 cm , respectively and the 0.1 -1 Classical ‘AB’ phase shoulder at 915 cm (due to Al-OH bending) Late ‘C’ phase reveal that the type of clay is disordered Ordinary coarseware kaolinite. The absence of a well-structured 0.01 layered alumino-silicate is reinforced also Rb Sr Ba Zr Nb Y La Sm Eu Yb V Cr Co Ni Zn by XRD and Raman studies. It suggests serial, fine-grained (fine silt) weakly hiatal, fine-grained (fine- hiatal, less fine-grained (coarse (re)firing of the incrusted pottery >500- QUASI- SAMPLE NON-DESTRUCTIVE METHODS DESTRUCTIVE fabric coarse silt) fabric silt) fabric 600°C. (2-3 µg) metamorphic derived aplastic metamorphic and volcanic metamorphic derived aplastic µ-Raman/ In the µ-ATR-FTIR spectra of red µ-XRD FT-Raman µ-XRF µ-ATR-FTIR (Qtz, Ms) derived aplastic (Qtz, Ms) very dense, not too plastic/pure (Qtz, Ms -- Pl, Opx, volcanic very dense, not too plastic/pure incrustation, kaolinite, quartz and traces of WHITE INCRUST. amorph. amorph. Fe, Ca, clay mineral gypsum were identified. The band at 647 (ph. ‘AB’) carbon Si, K (disordered kaolinite) lithofr., glass shard) -1 very dense, not too plastic/pure cm belongs to magnetite (Fe3O4), usually clay mineral RED INCRUST. amorph. amorph. Fe, Ca, present in natural hematite. The relative (ph. ‘C’) carbon Ti, K (disordered kaolinite), magnetite PETROGRAPHY AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF FINE intensity of OH stretching bands and the shift of the main Si-O-Si band towards lower CERAMICS .04 1015 wavenumbers suggest a lower firing µ-ATR-FTIR spectra of white and red incrustations K=kaolinite;Q=quartz; G=gypsum;M=magnetite Although Bükk fine ware was made from fine-grained, very dense and not very temperature compared to white-incrusted K .03 K Si-O-Si plastic raw material - which was probably washed for getting such a paste - in the pots. e Q c Q

n subsequent phases of the Bükk Culture, some differences can be outlined.

a 998

b K r .02 Finer-grained raw materials were used in the earlier periods: silt of metamorphic o s

b origin in the latest Tiszadob Culture (~ early ‘A’ phase) and later on, during the CONCLUSIONS A G white preclassical period (’AB’ phase) similarly fine raw materials were applied but with .01 G Former and new petrographic data clearly indicate G G K G G two kinds of origin, volcanic (local) and metamorphic ones. In the latest (’C’) phase that raw materials of similar and relatively delimited red G K M the utilized fine sediment became coarser-grained and more homogeneous of physical properties were applied to manufacture 0 3800 3400 3000 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 metamorphic origin. Bükk fineware in different sites. This fact proves that Wavenumber / cm-1 Bükk Culture potters acted on a special Opposed to previous suggestions (Szilágyi et al., 2008), samples of Bükk fine ware technological trick when selecting raw material for manufacturing their unique fineware. from Garadna site have more variable chemical composition. It means that it is not However, our former geochemical conclusion, that a certain chemical composition (between tight possible to determine one distinct source of the applied raw material for all vessels limits) for Bükk fineware can be outlined, has changed. Getting more data in our database, it has to be from different sites. It is more probable that they were manufactured from different stated that more diverse chemical composition characterizes this special ceramic type. raw materials. Question of raw material sources and possible workshops can be better understood after the detailed Concerning only fine ceramic from Garadna, investigation of samples of investigation of sediments from the newly involved sites. metamorphic derived aplastics indicated strong similarities to coarse pottery and to In the case of Garadna, Bükk fineware of consecutive chronological phases shows strong similarities each other (regardless of the different chronological phases of Bükk Culture) in both petrographically and geochemically. As they are geochemically similar to the coarseware, it is trace element composition. very probable that they were made from local raw material. Kalicz & Makkay (1977) Studia Archaeologica 7. Šiška (1995) Slovenská Archeológia, 43, pp. 5-24. Lichardus (1974) Saarbrücker Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, Band 12, Bonn. Szilágyi et al. (2008) Archeometriai Műhely, 2008/3, pp. 27-40.