DOCSLIB.ORG

Research on Invasive Pests and Diseases in New Zealand and the Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research on Invasive Pests and Diseases in New Zealand and the Law Regulatory issues in plant protection 281 Research on invasive pests and diseases in New Zealand and the law D.A.J. Teulon1, K.S.H. Boyd Wilson1, A. Holton1 and G.S. Ridley2 1The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch, New Zealand 2Environmental Protection Authority, PO Box 131, Wellington 6140, New Zealand Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Two New Zealand statutes have important implications for research with organisms not previously found in New Zealand and either incidentally or illegally introduced. The Biosecurity Act 1993 and the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 define the legal framework and allowable activities for ‘unwanted’ and ‘new’ organisms, respectively. Aspects of these Acts that are relevant to research activities possible with plant pest and disease organisms after their discovery, in particular those organisms requiring rapid development of management strategies and tools, are summarised. The need for accurate, detailed and accessible lists of ‘unwanted’ and ‘new’ organisms, and the need for the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) and the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to respond rapidly when the status of these organisms needs to be changed is highlighted. Consideration should be given to making the legislation concerning ‘new’ organisms more applicable to incidentally or illegally introduced organisms. Keywords new organisms, unwanted organisms, pest, disease, incursion. INTRODUCTION New Zealand productive (e.g. pastures, crops, Bactericera cockerelli and Candidatus Liberibacter orchards, plantation forests) and natural solanacearum (Teulon et al. 2009), the causal systems are subject to continued invasion by agent of kiwifruit bacterial canker Pseudomonas new pest and disease species from overseas (see syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) (Everett et al. 2011a), Goldson & Suckling 2003; Kriticos et al. 2005; the Monterey pine aphid Essigella californica Froud et al. 2008), and this is likely to increase (Flynn et al. 2003), and Didymosphenia geminata with increased trade (Liebhold et al. 2012) and (Lyngbye) Schmidt (commonly known as international travel. In some cases, these new didymo) (Bickel & Closs 2008). species are known to be sufficiently damaging The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) to these productive and natural ecosystems was formed on 30 April 2012 as a result of the that new pest management strategies and tools merger of the New Zealand Food Safety Authority, need to be developed rapidly. Recent examples the Ministry of Fisheries and the Ministry of include the clover root weevil Sitona lepidus Agriculture and Forestry. MPI investigates all (Eerens et al. 2005), the potato tomato psyllid suspected new pest or disease species found in New Zealand Plant Protection 65: 281-288 (2012) www.nzpps.org © 2012 New Zealand Plant Protection Society (Inc.) www.nzpps.org Refer to http://www.nzpps.org/terms_of_use.html Regulatory issues in plant protection 282 New Zealand. Its response includes establishing agencies (Biosecurity Act 1993). The Act provides the identity of the new incursion (i.e. genus/ a range of functions, powers and options for species name), determining its distribution within the management of risk organisms (MAFBNZ New Zealand, assessing its likely impact on New 2008b). The Biosecurity Act is administered by Zealand’s productive and natural ecosystems, MPI giving it considerable powers to respond undertaking a cost/benefit analysis of likely impact to new pest and disease incursions within New and management response, and the feasibility Zealand (MAFBNZ 2008a). of either eradication or long-term management The Act defines an ‘unwanted organism’ as (MAFBNZ 2008a). In many cases, where ‘any organism that a Chief Technical Officer eradication is not considered feasible, there is a believes is capable or potentially capable of need for research to support the rapid development causing unwanted harm to any natural and of new systems and tools for management of these physical resources or human health’. These new species once they are considered permanently organisms may or may not already be present in established in New Zealand. New Zealand. This definition also includes any Two New Zealand statutes have important ‘new’ organism that EPA has declined approval to implications for conducting research on new import (an unlikely scenario for most pests and pest and disease organisms that have been either diseases) and any organism specified in Schedule incidentally (a new organism that is imported 2 of the HSNO Act (no invertebrate plant pests in or on goods, with some specific exceptions) or diseases are listed there). or illegally introduced into New Zealand. These The Biosecurity Act also places a general duty are the Biosecurity Act 1993 and the Hazardous on all persons in New Zealand to inform the Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 MPI (as MAF in the Act) of the presence of an (HSNO), which define the legal framework and organism not normally seen in New Zealand allowable activities for ‘unwanted’ and ‘new’ (Section 44) or a ‘notifiable’ organism (Section organisms, respectively. 46), respectively. This paper highlights some of the important The Biosecurity Act stipulates activities that issues that are pertinent to research activities cannot be carried out with ‘unwanted organisms’ carried out with pest and disease organisms (Section 52) (prohibited activities.). “No person after they have been discovered in New Zealand. shall knowingly communicate [Oxford English The aim is not to interpret the legal intention of Dictionary = transmit], cause to be communicated, these Acts, but to identify some issues that plant release [no definition within the Act but in relation protection researchers need to consider when to ‘new organisms’ this means to allow the organism working with new pest and disease incursions to move within New Zealand free of any restrictions within New Zealand, and to suggest ways to other than those imposed in accordance with the make that activity more effective with respect to Biosecurity Act 1993 or the Conservation Act 1987], the law. This paper does not concern itself with or cause to be released, or otherwise spread, the introduction of new biological control agents any pest or unwanted organism except” under into New Zealand or the development of new special circumstances largely governed by MPI. genetically modified organisms, which both have Additionally, the Act stipulates “that the owner clear status as new organisms. or person in charge of an organism which that person knows or suspects constitutes, contains, Biosecurity Act 1993 or harbours a pest or ‘unwanted’ organism” must This Biosecurity Act provides a legal basis for not “propagate, breed, or multiply the pest or excluding, eradicating and managing pests and ‘unwanted’ organism or otherwise act in such diseases and unwanted organisms, and its powers a manner as is likely to encourage or cause the can be variously used by MPI, other government propagation, breeding, or multiplication of the agencies, regional councils and pest management pest or ‘unwanted’ organism” (Section 53 (1)(c). © 2012 New Zealand Plant Protection Society (Inc.) www.nzpps.org Refer to http://www.nzpps.org/terms_of_use.html Regulatory issues in plant protection 283 Making an organism ‘unwanted’ triggers field test, or release new organisms. These terms actions to be taken to manage the organism at the are described below. border or to require any activitiy (e.g. research) • ‘Import’ relates to intentional importation of within New Zealand to be approved. In order to the organism into New Zealand and generally conduct research on an ‘unwanted’ organism, into containment. This would seem to be a permission must be obtained from MPI (see reasonable restriction in most cases. MAFBNZ 2010a) and generally needs to be carried • ‘Develop’, in relation to incidentally imported out under containment conditions. organisms, includes ‘the deliberate isolation, aggregation, multiplication, or other use of Hazardous Substances and New Organisms the organism’. This could be interpreted as Act 1996 (the ‘HSNO’ Act) prohibiting the rearing of new pest organisms The purpose of the HSNO Act is to protect the for research purposes and, it is suggested that environment, and the health and safety of people this requires further policy consideration. and communities, by preventing or managing the • ‘Field test’ means ‘the carrying on of trials on adverse effects of hazardous substances and ‘new’ the effects of the organism under conditions organisms (HSNO 1996). The Act defines what similar to those of the environment into is a ‘new organism’ (Section 2A (1)) and what which the organism is likely to be released, is not (Section 2A (2)). A pest or disease species but from which the organism, or any heritable regarded as having newly invaded New Zealand material arising from it, could be retrieved is very likely to be a ‘new organism’ because it is or destroyed at the end of the trials’. This ‘an organism belonging to a species that was not definition seems to relate to newly introduced present in New Zealand immediately before 29 biological control agents or newly developed July 1998’. It may also be a ‘new organism’ if it genetically modified organisms. It does not ‘belongs to a species, subspecies, infrasubspecies, explicitly rule out ‘incidentally imported variety, strain, or cultivar that has been eradicated organisms’, so its application to research on from New Zealand’ such as the white-spotted new pest and disease incursions is not clear tussock moth, Orgyia thyellina (Morgan 1998). and requires further policy consideration. The Act is not clear if this relates to organisms • ‘Release’, in relation to new organisms, first found before and/or after 29 July 1998 and is means ‘to allow the organism to move within clearly problematic where there is disagreement New Zealand free of any restrictions other over whether a newly discovered organism is the than those imposed in accordance with the result of a new introduction or merely a failed Biosecurity Act 1993 or the Conservation eradication as is the case with the Mediterranean Act 1987’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crop Profile for Avocados in Florida
    Crop Profile for Avocados in Florida Prepared: August, 2008 Production Facts • As of 2002, the Florida avocado industry consisted of about 6,600 bearing acres, 737 growers, and 35 registered handlers/shippers. The majority of avocados (80 percent) produced in Florida are sold outside the state. Permits must be obtained for anyone wishing to sell more that 55 pounds of avocados per day. Consequently, most are sold to packinghouses from the farm (1). • In 2004-2005, Florida produced an estimated 28,000 tons of avocados. The value of the 2004-2005 crop was approximately $14.5 million or $0.26 per pound (1). • In 2004-2005, Florida was second behind California in avocado production nationally. Florida accounted for 9 percent of the production nationally, but only accounted for 5 percent of the value, owing to the fact that Florida avocados sell for less than the price (on a weight basis) garnered by California avocados (1). • Three “races” of avocado are recognized: West Indian, Guatemalan, and Mexican. These differ in blooming/maturity season, development period, fruit size, skin texture/color, oil content, and cold hardiness. West Indian and West Indian- Guatemalan hybrid cultivars predominate in Florida (2). • Avocado may be self- or cross-pollinating, and they are separated into A and B varieties based on reproductive functionality (2). Production Region Avocado (Persea americana) is grown exclusively in south Florida. Over 99 percent of Florida-grown avocado is produced in Miami-Dade County. Of the 737 farms reported in 2002, 88 percent were less than 15 acres, accounting for about a third of production, while those 50 acres and above (5 percent) accounted for approximately half of the production.
    [Show full text]
  • PMA Fresh Summit 2006 Silicon & the Control of Phytophthora Canopy
    PMA Fresh Summit 2006 Silicon & the control of Phytophthora Canopy management strategies Summer 2006 Print Post Approved - 44307/0006 Volume 17 No 4 Talking Avocados Avocados Australia Limited Talking Avocados Talking Avocados is published using avocado grower levies which are matched by the Australian Talking Avocados is published by Avocados Australia Limited. Government through Horticulture Australia. Published: Quarterly - Autumn, Winter, Spring and Summer Editor: Antony Allen, PO Box 663 Stones Corner Qld 4120 AVOCADOS AUSTRALIA LIMITED Phone: 07 3391 2344, Fax: 07 3391 2388 ABN 87 105 853 807 Email: [email protected] Circulation: 1,400 Copies Level 1, 123 Logan Road Printed by: Snap Printing, 101 Edward Street Brisbane 4000 Woolloongabba, Qld 4102 Australia Phone: 07 3221 5850, Fax: 07 3221 3208 Email: [email protected] PO Box 663 Stones Corner Qld 4120 Australia Subscriptions: Four issues per year: Australia: AUS $50.00 New Zealand: AUS $65.00 Phone: 07 3391 2344 Rest of the World: AUS $80.00 Fax: 07 3391 2388 Advertising: Avocados Australia Limited, Email: [email protected] PO Box 663 Stones Corner Qld 4120 - Phone: 07 3391 2344, Web: www.avocado.org.au Fax: 07 3391 2388, Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: This publication is produced upon the understanding Antony Allen [email protected] that no responsibility is accepted by Avocados Australia Limited Chief Executive Officer (ABN 87 105 853 807), its Directors and Officers or the Editor for any opinions, claims, statements made and views expressed in Avocados Australia Directors any edition of Talking Avocados. Readers should rely on their own Henry Kwaczynski Chairman 07 5442 1767 inquiries when making decisions concerning their interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchard Biosecurity Manual for the Avocado Industry
    Orchard Biosecurity Manual for the Avocado Industry Reducing the risk of new pests impacting on your orchard Version 1.0 Plant Health Australia (PHA) is the national coordinator of the government- industry partnership for plant biosecurity Avocados Australia is the peak industry in Australia. As a not-for-profit company, body for the Australian avocado industry. PHA services the needs of Members and Our members include avocado growers, independently advocates on behalf of associated businesses and industry the national plant biosecurity system. personnel. We provide a range of PHA’s efforts help minimise plant pest services, including guiding an annual impacts, enhance Australia’s plant five million ‘research and development’ health status, assist trade, safeguard and ‘promotion’ program, to assist the livelihood of producers, support the sustainable growth and development sustainability and profitability of plant within the Australian avocado industry. industries and the communities that rely avocado.org.au/industry upon them, and preserve environmental health and amenity. www.planthealthaustralia.com.au © Plant Health Australia and the State of Queensland, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation 2011 This work is copyright except where attachments are provided by other contributors and referenced, in which case The Department of Employment, copyright belongs to the relevant contributor Economic Development and Innovation as indicated throughout this document. (DEEDI) is working to promote profitable Apart from any use as permitted under primary industries for Queensland. the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be This will be achieved by providing reproduced by any process without prior its expertise and support to assist permission from Plant Health Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Spatial and Temporal Dynamic of Scab (Sphaceloma Perseae Jenk.) on Avocado (Persea Americana Mill)
    Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología ISSN: 0185-3309 [email protected] Sociedad Mexicana de Fitopatología, A.C. México Ávila Quezada, Graciela Dolores; Téliz Ortiz, Daniel; Mora Aguilera, Gustavo; Vaquera Huerta, Humberto; Tijerina Chávez, Leonardo Spatial and Temporal Dynamic of Scab (Sphaceloma perseae Jenk.) on Avocado (Persea americana Mill) Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, vol. 21, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2003, pp. 152-160 Sociedad Mexicana de Fitopatología, A.C. Texcoco, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=61221209 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 152 / Volumen 21, Número 2, 2003 Spatial and Temporal Dynamic of Scab (Sphaceloma perseae Jenk.) on Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) Graciela Dolores Ávila-Quezada, Daniel Téliz-Ortiz, Gustavo Mora-Aguilera, Colegio de Postgraduados (CP), Instituto de Fitosanidad, km 36.5 Carr. México-Texcoco, Montecillo, Edo. de México 56230; Humberto Vaquera-Huerta, CP, Instituto de Socioeconomía, Estadística e Informática; and Leonardo Tijerina-Chávez, CP, Instituto de Recursos Naturales. Correspondence to: [email protected]; [email protected]; (current address of first author: CIAD, A.C., Av. 4 Sur 3820, Fracc. Vencedores del Desierto, Delicias, Chihuahua, México 33089). (Received: October 7, 2002 Accepted: November 19, 2002) Ávila-Quezada, G.D., Téliz-Ortiz, D., Mora-Aguilera, G., en 60 frutos por árbol. Quince frutos se seleccionaron y Vaquera-Huerta, H., and Tijerina-Chávez, L. 2003. Spatial etiquetaron en cada punto cardinal en la parte baja (1-3 m.) and temporal dynamic of scab (Sphaceloma perseae Jenk.) de cada árbol.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Thermal and in Vitro Fungicide Treatments
    2019 VOLUME XXXVII, No. 3 SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER 2019 ISSN (print): 0120-9965 / ISSN (online): 2357-3732 ECEMBER CROP PHYSIOLOGY / FISIOLOGÍA DE CULTIVOS ECONOMY AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT / -D ECONOMÍA Y DESARROLLO RURAL 203 Effect of nitrogen and potassium on plant height and stem diameter of Jatropha curcas L. in Colombian tropical dry forest 283 Heritage and Patrimony of the Peasantry: an analytical framework to address Efecto del nitrógeno y el potasio en la altura de la planta y el diámetro del tallo de Jatropha curcas rural development L. en el bosque seco tropical de Colombia Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb VOLUME XXXVII, No. 3 SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER 2019 ISSN 0120-9965 Herencia y Patrimonios de Campesinado: un marco analítico para abordar el desarrollo rural EMBER Omar Montenegro, Stanislav Magnitskiy, and Aquiles Darghan Fabio Alberto Pachón-Ariza, Wolfgang Bokelmann, and César Ramírez-Miranda PT CROP PROTECTION / PROTECCIÓN DE CULTIVOS 297 Value chain analysis of panela production in Utica, Colombia E and alternatives for improving its practices S 213 Polyphasic identification of preharvest pathologies and disorders in avocado Análisis de la cadena de valor de la panela en Útica, Colombia y alternativas para mejorar sus prácticas cv. Hass Identificación polifásica de patologías y trastornos precosecha en aguacate cv. Hass Natalia Martínez Zarate, Wolfgang Bokelmann, and Fabio Alberto Pachón-Ariza Joaquín Guillermo Ramírez-Gil and Juan Gonzalo Morales SCIENTIFIC NOTE / NOTA CIENTÍFICA 228 Effect of thermal and in vitro fungicide treatments on
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Fruit Crops and the Diseases That Affect Their Production - R.C
    TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT – Vol. III - Tropical Fruit Crops and the Diseases that Affect Their Production - R.C. Ploetz TROPICAL FRUIT CROPS AND THE DISEASES THAT AFFECT THEIR PRODUCTION R.C. Ploetz Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Homestead, FL USA Keywords: banana, citrus, coconut, mango, pineapple, papaya, avocado, tropical fruit pathogens, Eubacteria, Eukaryota, Phytomonas, Oomycota, Pythium, Phytophthora, Botryosphaeria, Ceratocystis, Fusarium, Glomerella, Mycosphaerella, Nematoda, Candidatus Phytoplasma, Xanthomonas, viroid, virus, disease management Contents 1. Introduction 2. Significance of Diseases 3. General Categories of Plant Pathogens 4. Tropical Fruit Pathogens and the Diseases that they Cause 4.1. Eukayota 4.1.1. Kinetoplastida 4.1.2. Chromalveolata 4.1.3. Plantae 4.1.4. Fungi 4.1.5. Metazoa (the Animal Kingdom) 4.2. Eubacteria 4.2.1. Firmicutes (bacteria with Gram positive or no cell walls) 4.2.2. Proteobacteria (Gram negative bacteria) 4.3. Nucleic Acid-Based Pathogens 4.3.1. Viruses 4.3.2. Viroids 5. Interactions 6. Disease Epidemiology and Management 6.1. Epidemiological Principles 6.2. Avoidance 6.3. Exclusion 6.4. EradicationUNESCO – EOLSS 6.5. Protection 6.6. Resistance 6.7. Treatment of Diseased Plants 7. Conclusions SAMPLE CHAPTERS Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Tropical fruits are important components of natural ecosystems. A limited number of the thousands of species that exist are important to humans, and only 50 or so are significant commercial products. Diseases affect all of these crops. The pathogens are ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT – Vol. III - Tropical Fruit Crops and the Diseases that Affect Their Production - R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Plant Disease Threats to the New Zealand Avocado Industry and Climatic Suitability: a Review
    Pathogens 1 25 was funded through a grant from The Ministry of spray drift. NZ Kiwifruit, Feb: 18-19. for Business and Innovation under the project Holland P, Maber J, May W, Malcolm C 1997. Exotic plant disease threats to the New Zealand avocado “Protecting NZ’s Environment from Pesticide Drift from orchard spraying. Proceedings industry and climatic suitability: a review Exposure”. of the New Zealand Plant Protection Conference. Pp. 112-118. Kerry R. Everett1,* and Brad Siebert2 REFERENCES Johnson D 1995. Drift from orchard airblast Bonds JAS, Leggett M 2015. A literature review applications: Integration and summary of 1e New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Private Bag 92169, Mt Albert, of downwind drift from airblast sprayers: 1993 and 1994 field studies. Spray Drift Task Auckland 1142, New Zealand development of standard methodologies and Force (SDTF) Report No. I95-004. Stewart 2New Zealand Avocado, PO Box 13267, Tauranga 3141, New Zealand a drift database. Transactions of the ASABE Agricultural Research Services, Inc. Macon, *Corresponding author: [email protected] 58: 1471-1477. MO, USA. Connell R, Woodward S, Zabkiewicz J, Moller H, Wearing A, Perley C, Rosin C, Abstract The avocado industry was established in New Zealand from several importations Hewitt A 2010. Shelterbelt interception Blackwell G, Campbell H, Hunt L 2007. dating back to 1907. Several serious pathogens found elsewhere in the world were not of agrichemicals: model and field results. Biodiversity on kiwifruit orchards: the imported. A literature review and internet search were conducted to determine what Aspects of Applied Biology 99: 443-448. importance of shelterbelts.
    [Show full text]
  • University of São Paulo “Luiz De Queiroz” College of Agriculture
    University of São Paulo “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture Aetiology and epidemiology of grapevine anthracnose Ricardo Feliciano dos Santos Thesis presented to obtain the degree of Doctor in Science. Area: Plant Pathology Piracicaba 2017 Ricardo Feliciano dos Santos Agronomist Aetiology and epidemiology of grapevine anthracnose Advisor: Prof. Dr. MARCEL BELLATO SPÓSITO Thesis presented to obtain the degree of Doctor in Science. Area: Plant Pathology Piracicaba 2017 2 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação DIVISÃO DE BIBLIOTECA – DIBD/ESALQ/USP Santos, Ricardo Feliciano dos Aetiology and epidemiology of grapevine anthracnose / Ricardo Feliciano dos Santos. - - Piracicaba, 2017. 119 p. Tese (Doutorado) - - USP / Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”. 1. Vitis spp. 2. Elsinoë ampelina 3. Diversidade genética 4. Produção de conídios 5. Patometria 6. Progresso temporal e espacial I. Título 3 I dedicate with love to my parents Vicente and Kátia, my grandparents Diogo (in memoriam) and Adelina, my brother Rodrigo and my fiancée Amanda. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my sincere thanks to the following: God for guiding my steps. The “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture - University of São Paulo (ESALQ-USP) and the Graduate Program in Plant Pathology for my education during my doctoral study. The Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for providing the scholarship from March 2014 to February 2015 (grant number: 140710/2014-0). The São Paulo Research Foundation for providing the scholarship in Brazil from March 2015 to October 2017 (grant number: 2014/24472-1) and in Australia from August 2016 to March 2017 (Research Internship Abroad – BEPE, grant number: 2016/01508-6).
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Fruits, 2Nd Edition, Volume 1 R.E
    CROP PRODUCTION SCIENCE IN HORTICULTURE SERIES Series Editor: Jeff Atherton, Professor of Tropical Horticulture, University of the West Indies, Barbados This series examines economically important horticultural crops selected from the major production systems in temperate, subtropical and tropical climatic areas. Systems represented range from open fi eld and plantation sites to protected plastic and glass houses, growing rooms and laboratories. Emphasis is placed on the scientifi c principles underlying crop production practices rather than on providing empirical recipes for uncritical acceptance. Scientifi c understanding provides the key to both reasoned choice of practice and the solution of future problems. Students and staff at universities and colleges throughout the world involved in courses in horticulture, as well as in agriculture, plant science, food science and applied biology at degree, diploma or certifi cate level will welcome this series as a succinct and readable source of information. The books will also be invaluable to progressive growers, advisers and end-product users requiring an authoritative, but brief, scientifi c introduction to particular crops or systems. Keen gardeners wishing to understand the scientifi c basis of recommended practices will also fi nd the series very useful. The authors are all internationally renowned experts with extensive experience of their subjects. Each volume follows a common format, covering all aspects of production, from background physiology and breeding to propagation and planting, through husbandry and crop protection to harvesting, handling and storage. Selective references are included to direct the reader to further information on specifi c topics. Titles available: 1. Ornamental Bulbs, Corms and Tubers A.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Repositorio Digital Del INIAP
    UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DEL ECUADOR FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS CARRERA DE INGENIERIA AGRONÓMICA ANÁLISIS DE RIESGO DE PLAGAS DE FRUTAS FRESCAS DE AGUACATE (Persea americana M.) PARA CONSUMO ORIGINARIAS DE PERÚ. TRABAJO DE GRADO PREVIO A LA OBTENCIÓN DEL TÍTULO DE INGENIERO AGRÓNOMO CRISTIAN ANDRÉS ARELLANO ENRÍQUEZ TUTORA: ING. AGR. Clara Iza, M.Sc. QUITO, NOVIEMBRE 2016 DEDICATORIA Con mucho cariño a mis padres Federico y Carmita, y a mis hermanos David y Lucia. ii AGRADECIMIENTOS Agradezco a mi familia Federico, Carmita, Lucia y David por todo el apoyo y afecto que me han dado en estos años. A los profesores (as) y funcionarios (as) de la Carrera de Ingeniería Agronómica que colaboraron en el transcurso de mis estudios y en la elaboración de este trabajo. iii AUTORIZACIÓN DE LA AUTORÍA INTELECTUAL Yo, CRISTIAN ANDRÉS ARELLANO ENRÍQUEZ, en calidad de autor del trabajo de investigación o tesis realizada sobre: ANÁLISIS DE RIESGO DE PLAGAS DE FRUTAS FRESCAS DE AGUACATE (Persea americana M.) PARA CONSUMO ORIGINARIAS DE PERÚ, PEST RISK ANALYSIS OF FRESH FRUITS AVOCADO (Persea americana M.) FOR CONSUMPTION ORIGINATING PERÚ, por la presente autorizo a la UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DEL ECUADOR, hacer uso de todos los contenidos que me pertenecen o de parte de los que contiene esta obra, con fines estrictamente académicos o de investigación. Los derechos que como autor me corresponden, con excepción de la presente autorización, seguirán vigentes a mi favor, de conformidad con lo establecido en los artículos 5, 6, 8, 19 y demás pertinentes de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual y su Reglamento. Quito, 18 de Julio de 2016 Cristian Andrés Arellano Enríquez 172337226-2 cristian_andres24@hotma¡l.com IV Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1—Reviewers and Contributers
    Appendix 1—Reviewers and Contributers The following individuals provided assistance, information, and review of this report. It could not have been completed without their cooperation. USDA APHIS-PPQ: D. Alontaga*, T. Culliney*, H. Meissner*, L. Newton* Hawai’i Department of Agriculture, Plant Industry Division: B. Kumashiro, C. Okada, N. Reimer University of Hawai’i: F. Brooks*, H. Spafford* USDA Forest Service: K. Britton*, S. Frankel* USDI Fish and Wildlife Service: D. Cravahlo Forest Research Institute Malaysia: S. Lee* 1 U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey: L. Loope* Hawai’i Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife: R. Hauff New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries: S. Clark* Hawai’i Coordinating Group on Alien Pest Species: C. Martin* *Provided review comments on the draft report. 2 Appendix 2—Scientific Authorities for Chapters 1, 2, 3, and 5 Hypothenemus obscurus (F.) Kallitaxila granulatae (Stål) Insects Klambothrips myopori Mound & Morris Charaxes khasianus Butler Monema flavescens Walker Acizzia uncatoides (Ferris & Klyver) Neopithecops zalmora Butler Actias luna L. Nesopedronia dura Beardsley Adoretus sinicus (Burmeister) Nesopedronia hawaiiensis Beardsley Callosamia promethea Drury Odontata dorsalis (Thunberg) Ceresium unicolor White Plagithmysus bilineatus Sharp Chlorophorus annularis (F.) Quadrastichus erythrinae Kim Citheronia regalis Fabricus Scotorythra paludicola Butler Clastoptera xanthocephala Germ. Sophonia rufofascia Kuoh & Kuoh Cnephasia jactatana Walker Specularis
    [Show full text]
  • BIOSECURITY NEW ZEALAND STANDARD 155.02.06 Importation
    BIOSECURITY NEW ZEALAND STANDARD 155.02.06 Importation of Nursery Stock Issued as an import health standard pursuant to section 22 of the Biosecurity Act 1993 Biosecurity New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry PO Box 2526 Wellington New Zealand CONTENTS Endorsement Review Amendment Record 1. Introduction 1.1 Official Contact Point 1.2 Scope 1.3 References 1.4 Definitions and Abbreviations 1.5 General 1.6 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species 2. Import Specification and Entry Conditions 2.1 Import Specification 2.2 Entry Conditions 2.2.1 Basic Conditions 2.2.1.1 Types of Nursery Stock that may be Imported 2.2.1.2 Import Permit 2.2.1.3 Labelling 2.2.1.4 Cleanliness 2.2.1.5 Phytosanitary Certificate 2.2.1.6 Pesticide treatments for whole plants and cuttings 2.2.1.7 Pesticide treatments for dormant bulbs 2.2.1.8 Measures for Helicobasidium mompa 2.2.1.9 Measures for Phymatotrichopsis omnivora 2.2.1.10 Post-Entry Quarantine (PEQ) 2.2.2 Entry Conditions for Tissue Culture 2.2.2.1 Labelling 2.2.2.2 Cleanliness 2.2.2.3 Phytosanitary Certificate 2.2.2.4 Inspection on Arrival 2.2.3 Importation of Pollen 2.2.4 Importation of New Organisms 2.3 Compliance Procedures 2.3.1 Validation of Overseas Measures 2.3.2 Treatment and Testing of the Consignment 2.4 New Zealand Nursery Stock Returning from Overseas 3. Schedule of Special Entry Conditions 3.1 Special Entry Conditions 3.2 Accreditation of Offshore Plant Quarantine Facilities 3.3 Amendments to the Plants Biosecurity Index Biosecurity New Zealand Standard 155.02.06: Importation of Nursery Stock.
    [Show full text]